Slashdot Mirror


Omniscience Protocol

solidox writes "There is a new RFC discussing the Omniscience Protocol. It proposes that every computer be installed with an OP Client which would allow law enforcement ('Good guys.') and copyright holders (RIAA, MPAA) to remotely destroy the computer of any user who has been involved in copyright infringement ('evil-doer'). The client will be completely undetectable and unremovable by even the most skilled hacker. It also must be able to report to the server at any time. 'The OP must be able to communicate through uncooperative firewalls, NATs, and when the computer is disconnected from the Internet.' So if your computer randomly blows up in the next while, you can put the blame on this."

36 of 356 comments (clear)

  1. Old News! by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Funny
    C'mon, Slashdot. The alpha version of this has been avaliable since, like, the dawn of time.

    (Call me before they go gold with the omega release, though...)

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

  2. Scariest thing I have every read by panxerox · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is the scariest thing I have every read. Basically what is being said is that since you the consumer have abused your freedom (in the implied words of Hatch et.al) you now loose that freedom and will be punished at the will and whim of the Corporate (tm). In the minds (and I use that term loosely) of these people the freedoms that we have enjoyed as a people were never really ours but were theirs to dole out as they saw fit, to their benefit to their profit. The veil has been lifted and we now see the true face of our would be oppressors.

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
    1. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by DR+SoB · · Score: 2, Funny

      You think that's scary, G.W. Bush just signed a law, that effectively bans YOUR MOTHER!

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    2. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by nate1138 · · Score: 0, Funny

      you now loose that freedom

      AAAAARRRGH! Goddamnit! It's LOSE, not LOOSE, LOSE, not LOOSE!

      Lose

      Lose

      Lose

      Lose

      Lose

      Lose

      lose

      /me puts gun to head......

      BANG!

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    3. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by TXH-88 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh boy, I think ye've loosed it now.

    4. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you knew my mother you would agree with that ban.

    5. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by RLW · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes it did, but this is obvioulsy such an important issue that I could not possibly be a joke. An intent aware protocol is vitally important in order to maintane our rights, freedoms, and security. In fact when the 'net develops awareness then all crimes which involve network traffic will be detected, solved, and ajudicated in 30ms or less or it's free.

      Hail the computer! The computer is our friend!

  3. Remote Destruction by dolo666 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The client will be completely undetectable and unremovable by even the most skilled hacker."

    This statement reminded me of the "hacker" from the movie The Core, who asked for an unlimited supply of hotpockets and Xena tapes. But I've seen this post before, or is it deja vu? Fact is, any system that can be built, can be bypassed, so I don't know what the hell he's talking about.

  4. Who cares about the RFC.. by xTK-421x · · Score: 5, Funny

    The real thing I want to know is how many times are we going to see this posted today?

    --
    "TK-421, why aren't you at your post?"
  5. April blah blah blah by HomeGroove · · Score: 0, Funny

    April fools...yeah *yawn*.

    --

    ----
    Spam subject of the moment: Offshore account secrets -nashville disrupt

  6. Finally! by BlackLeader · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now the world will be free from pirates forever! No more swabbin' the deck and leerin' at young lasses at ports of call! Today is a great victory for democracy!

  7. communicate disconnected from the internet? by eljasbo · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if putting tinfoil around my computer would circumvent this?

    1. Re:communicate disconnected from the internet? by Manfre · · Score: 5, Funny

      Tin foil may not do the trick...try really strong magnets. :)

  8. Why? by vurg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why did the author write this RFC? Is he sucking up to the feds/RIAA?

    1. Re:Why? by rutledjw · · Score: 2, Funny
      Mod parent down.

      Happy April Fool's Day. D@mn I'm dumb...

      --

      Computer Science is Applied Philosophy
    2. Re:Why? by madfgurtbn · · Score: 2, Funny

      DRM ciphers the files on your computer and requires remote authorization (via the Internet) before deciphering them. It requires hardware support to prevent running unauthorized programs which could possibly save the file in unciphered format.

      The government would never allow this. No way.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
  9. Misprint by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 5, Funny

    "to remotely destroy the computer of any user who has been involved in copyright infringement"

    I think they actually meant:
    "to remotely destroy the user of any computer who has been involved in copyright infringement"

  10. Will this be based on RFC 3514? by Chairboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will this be based on RFC 3514? The RIAA could easily scan for systems with the 'evil bit' set to reduce the risk of accidentally hitting an innocent system.

    http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3514.html

  11. It's going to be a loooong day. by SysPig · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think I'll just come back tomorrow.

  12. oh please by queen+of+everything · · Score: 1, Funny

    Maybe its just me, but this sounds like a pile of crap. Aside from the fact that its just a ridiculous concept...name something that can be installed that even a skilled "hacker" can't edit, work around, or completely remove.

    --
    "Wisdom is not a product of schooling but of the life-long attempt to acquire it." -Albert Einstein
  13. Power lines and other shortcomings by gtrubetskoy · · Score: 5, Funny
    I find this RFC a bit limited because it does not seem to cover power lines. The protocol could easily include a provision to control devices that are merely plugged-in to the power outlet. A later version could extend this support to TCP capable nano-devices that could, for example, infiltrate common appliances (e.g. phones, fridges, tv's) and report back over powerlines on their status.

    So I doubt this RFC would gain adoption without those things.

    1. Re:Power lines and other shortcomings by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

      That would be the Omniscient Power Protocol (O.P.P.), which was developed a decade ago by Naughty by Nature.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  14. NEVER. by baudilus · · Score: 2, Funny

    The only way I see this happening is law enforcement forcing ISPs to check for this protocol on connected computers before allowing internet access. Those that refuse, don't have internet access. I wonder what that would do to internet retailers such as amazon.com when their sales drop through the floor because people refuse to install this garbage. It wouldn't take long to bury this "OP".

  15. Hah! by Himring · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just another April fools jo.... (connection reset by peer)

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  16. That Blamed Evil Bit by Hettch · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know, I had an odd feeling that the evil bit I heard so much about last year might in some way not be used for the good of the public.

  17. Re:SPAM Mails are more believable by defsdoor · · Score: 4, Funny

    Time to upgrade your computer Sir! Wang haven't been making machines now for donkey's years.

  18. Re:Simply patheticc. by HepCatA · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, but there is NO way in the world that this can happ****POOF***

  19. Re:Mod on April Fools Day by gowen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gullable: adj, susceptible to attacks by seabirds.

    Gullible: adj, easily fooled.

    (And they told me "gullible" wasn't in my dictionary)

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  20. The funny thing is ... by hiero · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... that as absurd as the requirements of this RFC are, they would have to actually be implemented for DRM to be non-hackable.

  21. Scariest? Do you not mean funniest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is so absurd, it does not even have the slightest chance of ever happening. It also would take a skilled cracker less then 5 minutes to circumvent, the trojan they want preinstalled on all PCs.

  22. Re:Read the RFC (date) by curiosity · · Score: 3, Funny

    No - they can use the Evil Bit. RFC 3514.

  23. Re:Oh purlease by thrillseeker · · Score: 2, Funny
    I can't decide what's funnier - the people who don't realize it's an april fools thing, or the people who just barely realize it, to the point where they feel the need to point it out to others.

    I think it's the people who feel a need to comment on Slashdot on such a thing ... oh wait ...

  24. Please... by Shadow2097 · · Score: 2, Funny
    C'mon now, we all know that just by looking for the evil bit at the start of OP packets we can filter them out. In fact, I'm pretty sure there were SEVERAL stories about this just about a year ago...

    -Shadow

    1. Re:Please... by Junta · · Score: 3, Funny

      And of course, when we note the evil bit being set, we just shoot the avian carrier out of the sky to drop the packet...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  25. Re:Yeah, So What? by bfg9000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You'll never see it on my computer. ;-)

    --

    I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

  26. Re:Simply patheticc. by skidde · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, everyone knows that Microsoft wouldn't be involved in an April Fool's joke until May.

    --
    For every karma whore there are four more people with mod points to kill.