Humanoid Robot Conducts Beethoven Symphony
me98411 writes "New Scientist is running a front page article about the Sony's QRIO bot [QRIO= Quest for Curiosity] successfully conducted an entire orchestra at the Tokyo Philharmonic Society. An impressive footage of the four bots performing a dance routine can be seen here [wmv format]"
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
Right, with all the grace of a metronome.
Lets hope Sony has designed "The Three Laws of Robotics" into these little bots.
Surely this would stop them from forming their own boy bands, or should I say Robo Bands.....
"Back street roboz"
--
Power to the Peaceful
1. A robot may not injure a Beatle, or, through inaction, allow a Beatle to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey the orders given it by roadies except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not mean playing in a rap band.
Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
Those little bastards dance better than I do...
-- El Sacarino tiene gusto de la chocha
Domo arigato, Conductor Roboto.
Q-RIO -> CURIO, I would imagine.
webpage
Not to say that this isn't a small achievement - I'll respect any company that can build a metre tall robot with fully articulated limbs and fingers, a robot that can break dance, throw a ball, anything like that. These are all goals homebrew robot builders could only imagine in their dreams.
But if Sony is commited to using these robots as assistants for the elderly, or even be able to walk my dog, it needs a brain.
I'm not talking about AI here; The'll need to be able to recognize faces, respond to commands, and do daily autonomous tasks (water a house plant, feed the cat, get the paper), at least as well enough to pass a Turing-like test to be useful.
So far, the only thing I've seen the QIRO do is dance. Once they demonstrate some functionality, I'll be intrested. Now it's just a toy.
Who thought of this? Don't you geeks realize that we're not getting the chicks as it is because we can't dance and then you go invent a robot that dances better than us. You know you're not going to be able to send this robot to a nightclub to pick 'em up for you.
Jeepers.
How about inventing a robot that beats up jocks instead?
On the other hand I'd love to see this robot take on a Dance Dance Revolution machine.
John.
I just sent in my application to conducting school. By the time I graduate, all the conducting jobs will be outsourced to robots. Oh well, I guess we should have all seen it coming, much like what happend to assembly and manufacturing plants in the 80s.
the video, or the fact that it still loaded for me near instantly a full 20 minutes after it was posted to slash
every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
""New Scientist is running a front page article about the Sony's QRIO bot [QRIO= Quest for Curiosity] successfully conducted an entire orchestra at the Tokyo Philharmonic Society."
How is this different from, say, a metronome?
And a 01 and a 10 and a 11....
Obviously you've never played in an orchestra. The conductor by far is the most important person out there, from your high school orchestra to the Vienna Philharmonic. The problem with your theory is that every musician has a different theory as to how a piece should sound. Try buying a few CDs of the same concerto played by different people. They are entirely different in all ways except the notes. The conductor is there to make sure all the musicians are playing the same version of the piece, not their own personal rendition of it.
Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
Africus aut Europaeus?
My immediate reaction was that it was CGI movie fakery. In fact, many moviegoers think the "perfect" motion of CGI objects is not merely unrealistic but also physically impossible.
Watch this footage, and think again.
Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly