Slashdot Mirror


Skype Releases PocketPC Version Of VoIP Software

An anonymous reader writes "According to WindowsForDevices.com, Skype Technologies has launched a free beta release of peer-to-peer voice calling software for WiFi-enabled handheld devices running Microsoft's Pocket PC software platform. PocketSkype is a 'thin' version of Skype, the company's original peer-to-peer voice-calling for Windows PCs which was released in August 2003. Like Skype, PocketSkype can be used to make free, unlimited, and unmetered calls anywhere in the world."

144 comments

  1. wow-- the first piece of pocket pc spyware? by way2trivial · · Score: 5, Insightful

    brought to you by the malkers of kazaa

    is there any spyware for the pocketpc that predates? I hope they got a patent on it..

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:wow-- the first piece of pocket pc spyware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I've downloaded and didn't see any spyware. I'm impressed with the sound quality and speed.

    2. Re:wow-- the first piece of pocket pc spyware? by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Informative

      not a troll at all.

      skype's eula grants them permission to install 3rd party useless shit, and them being who they are you really think they wouldn't do it?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:wow-- the first piece of pocket pc spyware? by NiteHaqr · · Score: 1

      Which is why I haven't used the non-pocket version, never mind this one.

      My thoughts on a solution is to run my own password protected Teamspeak server (www.teamspeak.org) and then tell my family and friends to get the client software.

      This will allow for group chats as well as one to one's via the rooms that can be set up.

      Its IRC for Voice, despite its FPS origins.

      And it doesn't cost any money....

    4. Re:wow-- the first piece of pocket pc spyware? by System.out.println() · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm waiting for Skype Lite from some anonymous hacker/developer, followed of course by Skype++.

    5. Re:wow-- the first piece of pocket pc spyware? by tcdk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Skype make quite a deal of the fact that it's doesn't contain spy or ad ware.

      I've used it quite a bit to communicate from Denmark to Greenland and I'm very impressed by the quality. I get a 4-500ms ping to my brother who's only on a dial-up, yet the quality is flawless and the lag isn't to bad.

      Now if only they would make a PalmOne version. I'm going buy a new PDA real-soon-now, but it's not going to be a MS based one. No way.

      --
      TC - My Photos..
    6. Re:wow-- the first piece of pocket pc spyware? by Stavr0 · · Score: 1
      Good point. I'll wait for SkypeLITE -- or until someone has performed packet analysis on exactly WHAT Skyper is sending ...

      (welcome to my friends list, way2trivial)

    7. Re:wow-- the first piece of pocket pc spyware? by subzerorz · · Score: 2, Informative

      The same goes for the desktop version which is awesome. Can't wait to use to call on land lines.

      --
      Subzerorz
      More Articles
    8. Re:wow-- the first piece of pocket pc spyware? by Inuchance · · Score: 1

      Oooh, so THAT explains why there's no Mac version.

      Seriously, I haven't seen any spyware on my mac yet (Nor on my Windows machine actually, but I avoid IE and "free" software a lot). In fact, even DiVX pro, which is spyware for windows now, is only a 15-day trial on Mac. I'm not saying it doesn't exist, though, because it probably does...

    9. Re:wow-- the first piece of pocket pc spyware? by NiteHaqr · · Score: 1

      The fact that they had spyware in a previous product shows that they dont have any problems with spyware.

      This makes them scum and once scum, always scum

      Skype may be spyware free, but who wants to deal with a known spyware advocate.

    10. Re:wow-- the first piece of pocket pc spyware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares what you buy? I guess as a slashdot monkey you have to say that you are not going to buy pocketpc. But then only other slashdot monkies really care about that.

    11. Re:wow-- the first piece of pocket pc spyware? by tcdk · · Score: 2, Informative

      [Googling..]...A quick search tells me that kazaa was sold til Sharman Networks in january 2002 and if I search google groups for the words "kazaa spyware" and limit the search for january 2002, I find lots of posts saying that Kazaa contains spyware... so I guess you are right and that they are Scum(tm).

      (it's been a long time since I installede Kazaa, but as I remember it, it actually contained options in the install program to not install all the extra crap)

      I think that there may be a problem here. I can't see how a VoIP system can get the market penetration for it to work, without huge money behind it (esp if it has to have POTS gateways) and I can't see how that can be done with Free/OSS. There may be a business model behind doing a POTS/VoIP gateway, but that's investing in the past and not something you'll find investors interested in.

      If Skype would open their source code and protocol [*] we could have a winner on our hands - if we could find some way to make it as profitable business to make gateways. But the thing is, it need a fairly big investment that will be less and less the more successful your system is, but is never the less needed to start the ball rolling.

      [*] Never going to happen - they got somebody to invest millions in them on the business model described on their homepage. They can't go back on that and that means no OSS or protocol.

      --
      TC - My Photos..
    12. Re:wow-- the first piece of pocket pc spyware? by owlstead · · Score: 1

      It's not spyware or malware. Actually, this is from the original makers of KaZaa.

      They (actually someone within the team that did the commercial stuff) sold the KaZaa software to some flaky Australian outfit when they hit big. That when things went wrong.

      I saw a Dutch TV documentary on the 10th year of ISP XS4ALL (it was also shown on national TV afaik). This because the lead developer was Dutch.

      Can't see them getting into such heavy legal fighting with this software, though the secret services may think differently :)

  2. How is this new? by Kenja · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How is this diferent then the VOIP software that came with my PocketPC?

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:How is this new? by EulerX07 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Can someone behind a firewall/router call you using that VOIP software? The one reason I started using skype is that my other software didn't work from behind my d-ling router.

    2. Re:How is this new? by Kenja · · Score: 1

      Dont realy know, I never used the stuff. I for one think that using a PDA to try and make phone calls is a rather poor idea. Given that I would need to use my cell phone to get a reliable internet connection anyways, whats the point?

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    3. Re:How is this new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My d-ling is bigger than yours!

    4. Re:How is this new? by toolo · · Score: 0

      Yes.. Skype works behind just about any configuration. I've tested it in multiple situations with my laptop.

    5. Re:How is this new? by sh0rtie · · Score: 5, Informative


      how about its not free? , check out the EULA

      You acknowledge that certain functions in the Skype Software are only available to paid subscribers after a free trial period of the Skype Software and Services (the "Free Trial Period") ends. After the Free Trial Period ends, you will be presented with the option to subscribe to the Subscription Services. If you do not wish to subscribe, you acknowledge that you can not access functions and services only available to paid subscribers. To subscribe to the Subscription Services you must agree to the terms and conditions of the Subscription Services.

      then they effectivly go on to say you ok them from any spyware concerns but unknown 3rd parties will have access to your machine

      (c) THE SKYPE SOFTWARE IS UTILIZED AND DISTRIBUTED BY THIRD PARTIES WHICH ARE UNRELATED TO SKYPER. YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT INSTALLATION OF THE SKYPE SOFTWARE WILL ALLOW THIRD PARTIES WHO ARE NOT AFFILIATED WITH SKYPER THE ABILITY TO COMMUNICATE WITH YOUR COMPUTER ("OUTSIDE PARTIES"). YOU AGREE THAT SKYPER WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGE, CLAIM OR LOSS OF ANY KIND WHATSOEVER

      why are we giving this time again ? next up on slashdot Gator/Claria bring you free VOIP ?

    6. Re:How is this new? by BagOBones · · Score: 1

      You could use a WI-FI adapter and make free calls from hot-spots or at home.

      --
      EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    7. Re:How is this new? by EulerX07 · · Score: 1

      That's what I'm saying, I was asking if his other program was able to do it.

    8. Re:How is this new? by jreilly · · Score: 1

      Well, third parties like other people using VoIP softare might want "to communicate with your computer", and you probably want them to.

      --

      Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose
    9. Re:How is this new? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Do these apps use any standards like RFC3261 SIP, connect to VoiceXML, etc, or all they all using some kind of closed proprietary protocol?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    10. Re:How is this new? by Octagon+Most · · Score: 1

      "You could use a WI-FI adapter and make free calls from hot-spots or at home."

      Sure this is interesting but strikes me as almost completely useless to the vast majority of people. It's sort of like discovering that a payphone near your house is broken and allows free calls. Wow, that's cool for a while then you realize that you want to be able to make phone calls from wherever you are at the moment and not have to first travel to a specific location. That's why we have mobile phones. And anyone with a wireless-equipped PDA is also very likely to have a wireless phone. If you are at home you might like the technology to make long-distance calls cheaply/freely but you can already do this with your computer. Bringing Skype to the PDA world is clever but targets an almost nonexistent market.

    11. Re:How is this new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's different to normal VOIP because:
      - the conversation is encrypted
      - the codecs achieve much better quality for the same bandwidth as the CCITT codecs, at a cost of CPU
      - it's easy to install and looks like a normal windows application (have you seen the user interface some of the other windows VOIP apps, WTF?)
      - it's unobtrusive when it's not being used (unlike the major router brand VOIP app)
      - the skype directory service works (name another VOIP directory where you can search for one of 140,000 users and have it work?)
      - the instant messaging actually works
      - the multiple sound card support works so you can have it ring in the main speakers and conduct the conversation on headphones

      the down site is it's a closed system in every way
      YMMV
      - it works through NATted firewalls on both ends

    12. Re:How is this new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the big selling point of VoIP is international calls or internal PBXs. Of course, SIP is a standard, but Skype is easy to use for home customers. Think of it as a better dialpad.com, but MSN Messenger is working to compete with it.

      However, you are right, that putting it on a PDA is really an excercise in futility, only done for sheer geek factor.

    13. Re:How is this new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Skype is proprietary, but you can bet it will have an SIP compatibility layer added if it becomes popular. The simple GUI is the selling point. Even though it's easy, it's about market penetration, and even though SIP is a standard, among home users, it doesn't mean anything more than Jabber vs. other IM protocols.

  3. Suddenly... by Knight+Thrasher · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Suddenly, WiFi monitoring becomes incredibly worthwhile.

    1. Re:Suddenly... by mr100percent · · Score: 5, Informative
      Skype's FAQ states that the software uses end-to-end encryption for the phone call.

    2. Re:Suddenly... by K_Bomb · · Score: 1

      yes, it does seem like it will become worthwhile, but at the same time, how are you supposed to know who someone is connected too if you only get a name like murphylee69@kazza???

      Or will this Voice over IP over WiFi have a DNS phonebook that someone can use to look up the name of someone registered to the IP that gets sniffed out of the intercepted packets?

    3. Re:Suddenly... by homer_ca · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Suddenly, WiFi monitoring becomes incredibly worthwhile

      Well considering the pitiful range of most handheld Wifi cards, you'd do better to just walk up to the guy and eavesdrop on his conversation. It's not like people talking on cellphones in public are trying very hard to speak softly. More often they're obnoxiously loud like "look at me. I'm important because I'm discussing important business on my cellphone"

    4. Re:Suddenly... by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      Especially if you can locate places to make VOIP calls from, or zones where this is allowed.

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    5. Re:Suddenly... by pestie · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that. Back in the day I used to drive around with a handheld radio scanner listening to cordless phones. 99.8% of what I heard was pretty mundane and uninteresting. It got boring fast.

  4. Old news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google News' main page SciTech section has been going off on this for the last 2 days. Perhaps we need Slashdot powered by Google News SciTech?

  5. Not too shabby! by JLavezzo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hey don't rag on them too badly! They are Hiring Linux Developers.
    KDEphone here we come!

  6. TROLL MY ASS by way2trivial · · Score: 4, Informative

    read this link please . and then decide

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:TROLL MY ASS by Feztaa · · Score: 2, Funny

      You want me to troll your ass? That could be painful.

  7. This isn't new. by andy666 · · Score: 1

    Voiceware released one like this in 2001.

  8. free phone calls ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful


    sounds like they need to watch their advertising standards, unless i can phone any telephone number in the world - for free , anytime
    otherwise its just a long range walkie talkie

    1. Re:free phone calls ? by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ditto! Without a free-beer bridge to other "phone" systems, this isn't practical for anything but walkie-talkie like service. It's like my friend who brags that he saves so much money with his internet phone, yet he still has to run to the corner pay phone to call us to brag.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    2. Re:free phone calls ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      telephone n. An instrument that converts voice and other sound signals into a form that can be transmitted to remote locations and that receives and reconverts waves into sound signals.

      Does not say "and plugs into a particular global network"

    3. Re:free phone calls ? by ShootThemLater · · Score: 1
      Well, at the moment Skype is saving me over GBP50 a month in international call charges, so I couldn't give a flying fuck whether it's a 'proper' phone or just a walkie talkie.

      When I want to brag about it to the great unwashed, I can just send a text to them :)

  9. Xpro + Asterisk by calle69 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why not use xten software? xpro for pocket pc connected directly to your asterisk server.

  10. Hopefully the FCC will stay away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The FCC has been muttering about/threatening to regulate VoIP as telephony. This would allegedly have some "benefits" like 911 service working from VoIP and "reliability" but it seems like it is impossible to offer free calling service under FCC regulation, much like it is impossible to have a new drug approved by the FDA without tons of money behind it, even if the drug itself is non-commercial. Hopefully the regulators at the FCC will stay away from VoIP until it is so entrenched that it will be tough to stop, like P2P services.

    -------
    Free mobile porn

  11. Systems clashing? by Viceice · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The way this is going, it feels more and more that mobile data and communications is going to a very critical place.

    On one end we have giant phone companies with large infrastructure assets trying to push tech like G3 and GPRS with a very high per minute/packet charge over cellular networks.

    On the other hand, we have hotspots sprouting up all over the place with subscriptions going from nothing to a cup of coffee. While coverage is still spotty, its capabilities are blurring, with everything from voice to data being possible over IP.

    Developments would be interesting to watch.

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    1. Re:Systems clashing? by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      T-Mobile USA offers unlimited GPRS for $30 ($20 if you have a voice plan)

  12. what fuss? by maxbang · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't understand the fuss about all of this VOIP stuff. I still can call only another VOIP user at this point, right? If that's the case, there are plenty of tools out there already that enable this, even on PocketPC, which an earlier post pointed out. I'd rather pay my $50 a month for my cell and call anyone I want from wherever I want. I do value the aspect of getting everyone to switch to VOIP, which is what I think skype (among others) are trying to do. Once that happens and that wimax stuff takes off, then we'll be much better off, methinks.

    --
    I also reply below your current threshold.
    1. Re:what fuss? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      All the various voip apps are incompatable too. You cant use skype to talk to someone with netmeeting or cucme or whatever else.

      They're trivial apps, really. Open port - send sound - playback sound. I don't know why a geek site is all wound up about it.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:what fuss? by Delirium+Tremens · · Score: 1
      The world does not stop at the edge of the 48 contiguous states. For people with contacts in Alaska, Hawai, Canada, Mexico and on other continents, Skype is a blessing.

      Unless you know of a $50 month calling plan for unlimited international calls?

    3. Re:what fuss? by maxbang · · Score: 1

      Exactly - thanks for bringing that up. Standards, people! And open ones, at that.

      I'm glad you asked and yes, I do excel at whining about problems without offering a solution.

      --
      I also reply below your current threshold.
    4. Re:what fuss? by xpl_the_myst · · Score: 2, Informative
      there are plenty of tools out there already that enable this

      Yeah, but these guys claim better voice quality. IP does not offer real-time guarantees theoretically, so it means that there is a lot of flexibility in trying to get the best implementation of Voice-over-IP. And from personal experience, Skype calls sound much better than say, Yahoo! Voice chat.

      What beats me is their claim about being peer-to-peer? What's peer to peer in voice chat? Unless they find the best route using all these peers, which doesnt look that possible.

      --
      This sig is empty.
    5. Re:what fuss? by maxbang · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sadly, for me most of the world does indeed end at the US borders. I was born here, but most of my family's back in India. For me to use this product to contact them, they would have to purchase a computer and get online in a place where electricity is spotty at best. They can, however, get a relatively cheap cell phone and I can call them for about five bucks (sixty a year). I understand your point and see how this can be useful for wired countries, but for most of the rest of the world skype is moot.

      --
      I also reply below your current threshold.
    6. Re:what fuss? by jhoffoss · · Score: 1

      Peer to peer means the other end must use Skype software as well. So this really isn't VOIP in the normal sense, whereas with a Vonage line, I can call any phone number. And the lack of a real-time guarantee is more or less fully made up by the speed of home broadband now.

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    7. Re:what fuss? by jhoffoss · · Score: 1
      Skype requires Skype on both ends.

      VOIP (i.e. Vonage) does not. VOIP provides a phone/voip gateway that switches your analog phone signal to data and sends it on to another VOIP gateway that switches your call back to analog.

      This is Skype (or their marketing dept.) calling their Internet phone software VOIP.

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    8. Re:what fuss? by maxbang · · Score: 1

      Thanks for clearing that up.

      --
      I also reply below your current threshold.
    9. Re:what fuss? by William+Tanksley · · Score: 1

      The "peer-to-peer" claim refers to the fact that lookups, data traffic, encryption, and routing is all accomplished without any reference to central servers. Skype therefore should not be vulnerable to typical network scaling issues -- it could support a HUGE number of users, since the users themselves provide all the network capacity.

      Typical VOIP, on the other hand, is centrally served; at least the routing (and sometimes all of the traffic) is done by a central server. That central service has to get VERY big VERY quickly.

      Someone else who replied to you claimed that P2P means that you can only call other Skype users. Although this may be true (I don't know), it doesn't have to remain so -- I'm sure Skype will be very willing to make money selling the right to use their access points to let you dial into landlines (and licensing their tech to other companies wanting to do the same).

      This is a HUGE use of P2P technology, fully as clever as BitTorrent.

      -Billy

    10. Re:what fuss? by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      In what way is Skype not VOIP? It provides Voice over Internet Protocol, which seems to satisfy the requirements of calling something "VOIP".

    11. Re:what fuss? by jhoffoss · · Score: 1
      Technically, yes. I guess it's just in my mind that VOIP means I can use it like a normal telephone. I've used skype twice to talk to a friend in Michigan, it works pretty well. But I don't want to have to sit at my computer to talk, nor do I want to have to call my friend on POTS to walk them through installing skype before I can talk to them on it. Not that it's tough, but I have some very non-pc-literate friends...

      If I didn't have a cell, I'd have vonage for sure, though.

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
  13. but by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Like Skype, PocketSkype can be used to make free, unlimited, and unmetered calls anywhere in the world.

    Only to other running instances of skype though, or does it interface with POTS for free (doubt it)?

    I mean, cool and all, but what's skype got that netmeeting/cucme/et al haven't had forever?

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:but by pestie · · Score: 3, Informative

      Encryption.

    2. Re:but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously have never heard of SSH Tunnels before. you don't really need encryption, just use what already exists

    3. Re:but by JofCoRe · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'll be sure to get that ssh tunnel set up from my Pocket PC right away :)

      Don't know if the commercial SSH apps for Pocket PC support tunnels, but I know that PocketPuTTy doesn't (yet!)...

      Even so, while I agree that SSH tunnels are the coolest thing ever (ok, maybe not EVER, but they are pretty damn cool), I don't know that that is really the best solution for this particular instance... (on a PocketPC, that is)

      --

      Place sig here.
    4. Re:but by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Scheme to get around firewalls. Usability. Encryption. The momentum to make it big? High quality voice?

  14. I just crapped my pants by JVert · · Score: 1

    I am running around the office screaming like a girl right now.

    This is a good thing.

    We use smartphones at our work and do alot of house calls where are clients would always have highspeed internet with avalable wireless but not always cell service.

    Made my damn day.

    It just better work!

  15. Skype vs. I.M. with voice? by Maarek_1 · · Score: 1

    I tried this program and maybe I missed the point somewhere, but what is the big difference between this program and any other I.M. program that allows voice? It looks like it will only connect to other skype users, so what's the big? I would love to RTFA, but I am behind a proxy and can't get there (boo). Anyone want to illuminate this for me?

    1. Re:Skype vs. I.M. with voice? by subzerorz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Skype is suppose to work with firewalls and proxy's. There is no need to reconfigure firewalls.

      --
      Subzerorz
      More Articles
    2. Re:Skype vs. I.M. with voice? by Backov · · Score: 1

      It works a hell of a lot better than any of the IM voip stuff we've tried. Effortlessly works through any manner of firewalls..

      Get this - calling my friend in Thailand over Skype, the call quality is better over his 28.8k connection than me calling him on the phone.

      Great piece of software.

      --
      In the law there is no overlap between theft and copyright infringement whatsoever.
  16. skype by greysky · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The company I work for uses skype for phonecalls (we all work from home). It's really handly, esp since we outsource some of the development work to India and Vietnam, and we can call the team leads over there at no cost.

    1. Re:skype by FeeDBaCK · · Score: 1

      The company that I work for uses skype to communicate between our sales people, our offices in the USA, UK, India, and Mexico and everything in between. The monetary savings on our long distance is well worth it. We'll probably even buy the service once it comes out of beta, unless we can manage to get *real* VoIP between our facilities at nearly the same cost.

      We would prefer not rely on an outside company for our phone infrastructure, but for the cost (free now), it can't be beat.

      Now if only there was a linskype, I would be set. For now, I have torun skype in vmware.

      --
      wolf31o2 Developer, Gentoo Linux Games Team
  17. Nice Slashvertisement. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do I get front-page coverage for _my_ vaporish beta?

  18. No local telephone interface? by Professr3 · · Score: 1

    Now, I know everyone loves P2P, but why is this something new? Yahoo messenger, AIM, and MSN all provide the same functionality when it comes to voice chat with other users. Skype is just a dedicated voice chat client, with a smaller user base than any of the other current chat clients. Now, if Skype made some users share their modems (yes, I hear some people still use those things), then it would be a true P2P interface to the local phone system, which I believe is the only thing that could give Skype a real chance. Any thoughts on this?

    1. Re:No local telephone interface? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Now, if Skype made some users share their modems (yes, I hear some people still use those things), then it would be a true P2P interface to the local phone system, which I believe is the only thing that could give Skype a real chance. Any thoughts on this?

      Would a typical modem chipset be adequate for this? Assuming even a traditional Rockwell voicemodem.. I think you'd need to be running a FXO board or something

    2. Re:No local telephone interface? by drewzhrodague · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Perhaps some of us with unlimited local calling, might allow VOIP users to call locally using their lines -- within specified limits, I would assume. This makes sense, but I can't imagine the telcos, or internet-providers would allow it. Certainly turns telecom on it's ear, so to speak.

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    3. Re:No local telephone interface? by NotoriousQ · · Score: 1

      The problem is bigger then that. I would not want to share my local phone, since I would be liable for anything illegal coming from that phone. Common carrier protection would not apply, since I am not a registered provider of anything.

      P2P phones will not work due to that fact.

      --
      badness 10000
  19. Pocket GPhone by mknewman · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been using Pocket GPhone which comes on my Toshiba E805 for a few months now. You can check it out at http://www.vliusa.com/prof_personal/index.php The version I am using is 3.0 which is much, much better than the 1.0 version that comes on the E805. Works pretty well, with the typical pauses due to the network, and you do want to use it with a headset to prevent echoing, but the cool thing is they are hooked up to some sort of VoIP network and for $20 for 600 minutes you can make calls to virtually any phone. The rates for International calls are the best I have seen, anywhere. $0.05/min for most countries. You can use it for free for PDA-PDA (or even PC) calls for 60 days but then you have to pay them something to use their 'Buddy' service, but even then you can still make direct IP address based phone calls. No affiliation, just a relatively satisfied user. Marc

  20. Condi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmm. Condi could make my "PocketPC" very happy indeed...

    1. Re:Condi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i had no idea black people could look that ugly, then again she is only a token

    2. Re:Condi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't dis Condi!

      She's a sweet girl and smart too! She's got a PhD.

      I've got that picture on my cubicle wall.

    3. Re:Condi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG she is hottttttt, that sex change really worked !

  21. Can it call telephones? by deviantonline · · Score: 1

    Can this program call telephones or just people on the network?

    1. Re:Can it call telephones? by benzapp · · Score: 1

      RTFA

      they will be adding that ability as a pay for use feature, as well as stuff like voicemail. PC to PC calls will always remain free however.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    2. Re:Can it call telephones? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      PC to PC calls will always remain free however.

      For unknown lengths of forever. If they control the servers and protocol, can't they just switch that off at any time? (Didn't Kazaa suddenly change protocols to freeze out some compatable apps once?)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  22. skype pc ver = spyware? by Syncalot · · Score: 1

    Im reading alot while doing some searches on google that skype has spyware in it even tho if you go to their site they claim they dont.. im not talking pocket pc right now.. BUT i hear there are sleeping spyware dlls for skype on the pc.. ?? anyhow. on top of that. im about to launch a new sync system all your pocket pc owners if you want a beta hit us up at http://www.syncalot.com sorry for the shameless plug. :)

    --
    Pocket Girls. Mobile Adult Mini Mags for your Phone.
  23. Funny.. just too funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I posted this story 3 hours ago and it got rejected.. same links and everything.. just too damn funny..

    :\

    1. Re:Funny.. just too funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So? Here's what you do: after your submission is rejected, add it to your own journal. If someone else gets the story accepted, you can post a simple link to yours in case there's a point or link they missed.

      Otherwise, STFU.

  24. Do it yourself by homer_ca · · Score: 2, Informative

    Might be more complex, but you can set up your own VoIP PBX with Asterisk. It's free software that runs on Linux and supports industry standard SIP protocol so you can connect all kinds of devices like hardware IP phones, analog telephone adapters, and IP softphones on PCs and PDAs.

    1. Re:Do it yourself by NiteHaqr · · Score: 1

      Definately thinking of Asterix, but its a little "heavier" than Teamspeak - and I barely have the time to install and configure Teamspeak.

      I need more hours in the day :)

  25. Revolutionize the Voip industry by subzerorz · · Score: 1

    I think the next step is using skype with your current phone system and route calls. Maybe more to the PBX or Cisco's VoIP solution.

    --
    Subzerorz
    More Articles
  26. Read the EULA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you acknowledge that installation of the skype software will allow third parties who are not affiliated with skyper the ability to communicate with your computer ("outside parties"). you agree that skyper will not be liable for any damage, claim or loss of any kind whatsoever
    skype.com/eula.html
    no spyware egh ? Morpheus P2P also make a big deal of the fact that it's "doesn't contain spyware" but the reality is it's riddled with it, this is the internet, people lie. these people came up with Kazaa a product built on piracy filled with the worst spyware on the planet and you expect me to trust them?!

    trust once lost is rairly gained again and that EULA just confirms their stereotype

    1. Re:Read the EULA by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I read that paragraph to say "other peoples computers will communicate with yours", which is, uh, kind of the point of a VoIP program. I think they are just being overly-paranoid with the legal stuff.

  27. Read it here on Techtree.com! by PhrozenF · · Score: 4, Informative

    Read the entire story here on Techtree.com. They have some interesting observation and comments too.

    "However, there are various issues raised over "voice-over Wi-Fi." Firstly, there isn't enough Wi-Fi coverage yet to make it feasible for the executives who are the primary users of pocket PCs to own only that device. Most people who would want to use that service need a reliable network. Also, the sound quality offered is poor."

  28. There are more free service providers listed here: by isolvesystems · · Score: 0

    There are more free service providers listed here: VoIP Service Provider http://www.isolvesystems.com/

    --
    http://www.isolvesystems.com - Technology Marketplace
  29. Subscriber drive? Sweeps week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is /. flooding itself with trivial stories, is it supposed to make the site look better, more on top of things, to post a new story every 20 minutes? Hint: it doesnt.

    Who fucking cares about some kazaa spyware voip app?

  30. Re:I deny his contributions to popular culture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Of course it is.

    Anything us humans do is culture. Even taking a dump.

    Don't be an elitist.

  31. Not For a While... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...because the first 6 months' conversations will be mostly variations on this theme:

    "Yeah, I'm calling you on my PocketPC! Yeah! VOIP! Yes!

    What? 'Voice Over IP'.

    What? 'Internet Protocol'.

    1. Re:Not For a While... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Since this looks like another proprietary VOIP protocol, if the other person doesn't know that it's VOIP on a PocketPC .. well ..

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  32. How this Skype new/better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I saw a number of posts stating that many Instant Messaging clients (or NetMeeting) already offer VoIP "telephone" services.


    Skype is better because:

    a) the voice quality is by far better, especially with narrow-band connections (I'm speaking form experience)

    b) Skype is able to get even through quite tightly configured firewalls, where NetMeeting, ICQ, MSN etc. have a number of problems that only can be solved by changing firewall settings.

  33. Another VOIP app - WiFive by zapp · · Score: 3, Informative

    WiFive is another free VOIP app for PocketPC. With WiFive you can connect to other WiFive users, Netmeeting, or if you have your own Gatekeeper (call server), you can make calls through the PSTN as well.

    --
    no comment
    1. Re:Another VOIP app - WiFive by efficacymanUM · · Score: 1

      This would be really cool in combination using something along the lines of Vonage, to allow you to make a call from anywhere and route it to POTS anywhere in the US/Canada for a flat fee. An interesting concept to say the least, allowing you to call anyone from anywhere wi fi is offered. Wonder how it works with the Asterix PBX as a gate keeper?

  34. Re:Subscriber drive? Sweeps week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    There was a poll amongst the subscribers (including me) and one of the most popular requests was that the rate of front page stories should be increased.

    I don't want to wait for hours for another story.

  35. Re:And running Debian! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    loser.

  36. Suggest a phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can anyone suggest a compatable phone? my main considerations are price & functionality. please give a little about your Personal experience using the recomended type...

  37. Bah, WM2003 only by cyberchondriac · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm "stuck" with my Toshiba e550g genio - I love the screen, and it's got a 400MHz XScale CPU, but there is no 2003 upgrade for it. PPC2002 is as far as it goes. I don't understand why, or what the difference there between it and a PocketPC that is upgradable to WM2003.
    How hard would it be to put linux on this thing ?

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    1. Re:Bah, WM2003 only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Toshiba doesn't want to pay for it's customers to have access to it.

      It's the exact same situation with the Hitachi G1000 - A brilliant piece of hardware, that is stuck on Pocket PC 2002 because the hardware manufacturer doesn't want to update their drivers and pay for the cost of doing an update (users would even be happy to pay for the upgrade - they still don't want to do it).

      Crying shame since the G1000 would be the absolute best Pocket PC on the market - if only it was running the latest OS.

  38. Skype seems fine to me. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Skype seems fine to me. It has much better sound quality than regular telephones. I use it to talk to a friend in France. Neither of us have ever seen any bad behavior in Skype, in several months of use.

    For those who want to use the traditional communication device, BigZoo and OneSuite are excellent. OneSuite is 2.9 cents per minute from the U.S. to France. BigZoo is 2.8 cents per minute.

    I'd like to have a USB sound card so that I could isolate the audio from the electromagnetically noisy computer, however. Any ideas?

    1. Re:Skype seems fine to me. by idrisnolan · · Score: 1

      Plantronics (www.plantronics.com) makes USB headsets. They also have noise canceling microphones.

  39. When Free doesn't mean Free by bogie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorry but your page of "Free" providers is nothing more than a link to a bunch of commercial services which cost money. How can companies that charge $24 a month or charge by the minute be considered "Free service Providers"? If they were really Free than there would be no fees for the service.

    You might as well have linked to a bunch of Cell phone plans and said "Free Long Distance Providers"....when you sign up for their $50 a month plan.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re:When Free doesn't mean Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      looks like a linkfarm to me

  40. Open source version of Skype? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2, Informative


    Another thought: What we really need is an open source version of Skype.

    Also, note that Skype works over heavily firewalled systems. It communicates over the browser port 80, if necessary. Skype is an excellent demonstration that firewalling does not necessarily create real security. ZoneAlarm's outgoing firewalling is good in this case, however.

  41. Gimmie an F! Gimmie a U! Gimmie a D! by adolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Um.

    "Communicate with [...] outside parties" == talk to the people who call you on your lovely new Skype kit, perchance? (after all, the whole point is to communicate with third parties, isn't it? or did you just want to talk to the folks at Skyper all day?)

    "Distributed by third parties". Third parties, eh? Like tucows and c|net? Those third parties? Or maybe they mean "third parties" like those promiscuous P2P folks that allow the system to work in the first place. This sounds Really Dangerous. Really.

    "Skyper will not be liable for damage". I mean. No shit. The GPL has similar verbiage, and so does every other bit of boilerplate in the world.

    How you manage to read promises of spyware into those paragraphs, I'll never know.

  42. Re:Skype vs. I.M. with voice? (article text) by galtsavenger · · Score: 1

    Apr. 07, 2004

    Skype Technologies has launched a free beta release of peer-to-peer voice calling software for WiFi-enabled handheld devices running Microsoft's Pocket PC software platform. PocketSkype is a "thin" version of Skype, the company's original peer-to-peer voice-calling for Windows PCs which was released in August 2003. Like Skype, PocketSkype can be used to make free, unlimited, and unmetered calls anywhere in the world.

    "PocketSkype users need only an affordable headset to use their PDA for telephony," the company says.

    According to Skype, PocketSkype is easy to download, simple to use, and offers superior call quality and security. PocketSkype features are said to include free Skype-to-Skype calling, conference calling, instant messaging, access to a "global decentralized directory," online presence, and contact lists.

    Analyst firm Gartner predicts that by the year 2008 there will be more than 167,000 public Wi-Fi hotspots around the globe and over 75 million Wireless technology users worldwide, according to Skype.

    The free beta of PocketSkype is available for download here. PocketSkype supports handhelds running Pocket PC 2003 with a 400MHz or faster processor, and equipped with WiFi; addition of a headset is recommended. A PocketSkype user guide and FAQ are also available on Skype's website.

    Since its launch in August 2003, the Windows PC version of Skype has been downloaded more than 9.5 million times, Skype says.

  43. Nice program by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Great, but now can we _please_ have a unix port!?

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  44. User Experience by thpdg · · Score: 0

    If anyone is interested:
    I just installed it on my Viewsonic V37 (Pocket PC 2003), which has only an SD slot for expansion. There is only one SD WiFi card. It's the Socket one, which is sold under the names Socket, Viewsonic and Sandisk. Same card, same driver.
    In my office, that's paired up to my Linksys WAP11, connected to world through a cable modem. Actually, that part doesn't matter, since it was an in office call.
    The sound quality was fairly bad, but the processor usage was low. The lag was about 5 seconds. I could understand what was being said, but the words seemed stretched out. Much less quality then a PC to PC call, normally. I had echo cancellation on, but it didn't seem to work well, as I could hear a message bouncing back and forth. This was Pocket PC to regular PC that had already been using Skype.
    If anyone has any ideas to try, or questions about it, let me know. I'll give it a shot.

    --

    -Patrick

    "They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."

  45. Re:Subscriber drive? Sweeps week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I voted for more CowboyNeal!

  46. Yes, it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just tried it on my iPaq 5450, connecting via 802.11b to an ADSL 512kbit internet link. It works fine, just as well as the desktop version - quality was clear, and holding the PDA to my ear like a phone was a new experience..

    1. Re:Yes, it works by jc42 · · Score: 1

      ... and holding the PDA to my ear like a phone was a new experience.

      Hmmm ... I do that with the Kyocera 6035 smartphone (a PalmOS PDA phone) that's been riding around in my pocket for the past two years or so. It's hardly a new concept to a lot of us.

      Of course, it's not WiFi. It uses digital cell-phone technology, so it's usable in about 2/3 of the US. This is at least 1000 times the coverage of WiFi, which only works in a few blocks of a few cities (including the one I live on because of my Airport ;-).

      This does mean that its internet access is painfully slow, of course. When WiFI gets near-universal coverage like the cell-phone system, it'll probably be a lot better. But we have a loooooooong way to go before we'll see that.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  47. Re:Nice program - Use GnomeMeeting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything in the title.

  48. Re:Gimmie an F! Gimmie a U! Gimmie a D! by sh0rtie · · Score: 1


    maybe "3rd parties" is too broad a description as "other skype users communicating" were specifically identified in section 3 of the EULA , the "third parties" later on effectivly overides this so why bother mentioning skpe users specifically earlier ? exactly which 3rd parties are which ?

    but this highlights the trust issue with Skype, even the first poster said "spyware on pocket pc's !!"
    because thats instantly what comes to mind when mentioning these people in the tech community.

    perhaps cos we know their history of exploiting and abusing their users with what seems like contempt to the highest bidder that their new "free" projects are even deemed suspicious and subject to scrunity, after all these guys made spyware into why JoeShmoes families computer keeps crashing and still doesnt know why Google has 5 porn popups because he installed something he heard about on some RIAA newstory, is that how we are going to encourage more people to use computers ?

    whats to say they have changed ? i really hope its genuine and they have left all their previous dodgy shenannigans behind them, im totally up for people who want nothing more than to provide a good product, just as long as you aint the product ;) can lepoards really change their spots ? we shall see in time no doubt...

  49. Free? Skype? PSTN? by muonzoo · · Score: 2, Informative
    Like Skype, PocketSkype can be used to make free, unlimited, and unmetered calls anywhere in the world.


    For some values of anywhere. As long as anywhere means "another Skype client" or "paying for a PSTN termination".
    Skype rhymes with Hype for a good reason.
  50. I thought the FCC was FIGHTING demands to reg it. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    The FCC has been muttering about/threatening to regulate VoIP as telephony. This would allegedly have some "benefits" like 911 service working from VoIP and "reliability" [...]

    My impression was that the telephone companies were going to court and DEMANDING that the FCC regulate VoIP as telephony, and the FCC was doing its flat-out damdest to fight this, since the current FCC is hell-bent to keep the government's hands off the interenet (including especially hands in the other branches and levels of government.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  51. Works great for tech support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Skype for providing Tech Support for friends. I can talk someone through a troubleshoot faster than those remote things like VNC, RemoteAdmin and that RemoteXP crap. YMMV but
    the only thing I see as a downside to Skype is the future, where they may provide a true conferance call capability, with video and clear audio. That would be worth paying for. Nothing outrageous, but a small one time fee, say 25 dollars, and they would make a ton of money and recoup their development costs, and put food on the table.... plus the user base would rise daily.
    Subscription service is NOT the way to go.

  52. AES 'n' RSA by Sloppy · · Score: 1
    Suddenly, WiFi monitoring becomes incredibly worthwhile.
    According to the FAQ, they use AES for the block cipher, and the session key is handled using RSA. MitM attacks against the RSA, are handled by using Skype's server as a trusted introducer.

    So.. attack the server. ;-)

    Ok, now that the "attack the server" joke is out of the way, chew on this: I bet the government will be allowed access to the server, should it be deemed necessary. I wonder who else will have access. I bet nobody will ever know. Or ask. Or say anything, should it ever be compromised.

    Will users be able to configure the phones to use some other party as an introducer, or let people exchange keys themselves, out of band? Somehow I doubt it.

    That's why I want open phones. :-) Rip out the I-always-trust-this-one-CA crap, and replace it with PGP.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  53. uh, TTFS (Try the &&&&ing Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the doubters read the FAQ and tried the software they would know that 1) it IS based on P2P and 2) the quality is nothing short of AWESOME. I've tried other popular voice chat progs and they were a bad walkie talkie. Skype actually IS BETTER than a land-line phone call. Seriously.

  54. Alternatives by trawg · · Score: 1

    If you don't mind a bit more messing around and can deal mentally with the stress of not actually having something that "makes calls", check out TeamSpeak or Ventrilo, both great voice communications packages.

    I don't get what's so awesome about a peer-to-peer voice communications system. The fact that its encrypted sure is neat, but it doesn't seem to be a quantum leap over most of the other stuff we have now. Its not like a regular p2p system where you're going to get massive advantages - each voice call is different so its not like your client is going to be able to search these peers to get improved performance.

    Surely, to decrease latency, you're going to connect directly between the peers anyway - hence, 'p2p', but it seems the marketing department are just focusing on the phrase 'p2p' to try and encourage more users to check it out. I found the explanation of Intelligent Routing on their p2p explained page a bit vague.

    Anyway. Looks good for the newbies.

    Also, there's a bunch of posts earlier whining about how Skype will be soon full of spyware. I'm not, and have never been, a Kazaa user so I'm not sure at which point the spyware stuff was introduced, but I feel its worth pointing out that the guys making Skype are NOT the same guys that currently manage Kazaa these days.

  55. irellivent by SteelRat · · Score: 1

    there is already a bunch of SIP talking linux soft-phones and supporting software.

    kphone
    linphone

    some other supporting software
    galago
    sarp
    sipimp

    look at the freeworlddialup forums for lots of chatter about SIP softphones and using images on cisco hardware.
    assorted other softphone downloads here.

  56. Re:irellivent [sic] by JLavezzo · · Score: 1

    I guess you meant irrelevant... :)

    I know what you mean. Mostly I couldn't resist pointing out that SOMEONE was actually hiring for Linux in this lousy job market!

    I had the impression that this phone app would connect you to a physical telephone. If not, anything that isn't an extension of Gaim, Kopete, or Jabber is a waste of time. (not that I'm working on one)

    (I'd also just changed my sig and wanted to post something)

  57. Re:irellivent [sic] by SteelRat · · Score: 1

    your spelling correction is clearly relevant :D (I'll actually spell check things this time)

    I haven't seen too many problems with people out of work in linux (well.. lately anyway). I've seen a lot of consulting and contracting ops and contract-to-hire positions popping up for the last six months, and in the last three months fairly heavily. Good times should be back soon, methinks.

    I was even inspired to ramble briefly in my lame blog, and one of the projects I linked to above did incorporate SIP into IMs in somekind of way, though I have not tried it.

    I would think it more likely that this would be merged into gnomemeeting in some kind of plugin fashion in the future, but hey. I'll be happy with however it works out.

    POTS to VOIP interoperability will likely be sticky for years and years. I anticipate running my own until the market gets to where I want it to be.. likely in several years.

    Until then, it's a nice toy. Everyone I've heard about (large office structures possibly accepted) have had huge headaches in their adoption.

  58. First spyware on Linux too ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First spyware on Linux too !
    Yepeee !

    Look like theses guys will soon enter in the Guiness Book