Slashdot Mirror


Overseas Crooks Abuse TTY Phone Service

Rick Zeman writes "The Arizona Daily Star is reporting on how 419 scammers and credit card thieves are abusing the US' TTY service which enables hearing-impaired citizens to make phone calls with the help of an intermediary operator. 'The callers try to use stolen credit-card numbers to make big purchases of merchandise from American companies. The operators often suspect fraud, but they can't just hang up. Federal rules require them to make the calls and keep the contents strictly confidential.' Yes, Virginia, they have no shame...."

53 of 304 comments (clear)

  1. No authentication leads to abuse... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anything that's totally given away for free meant to help a certain segment of society should at least seek proof that the person taking advantage of the service is a member of that segment of society.

    No government in the USA hands out handcapped parking permits to everyone who asks. There's a documentation process to certify that one is entitled to it. Sure, that process sometimes gets fooled into giving a permit to somebody not entitled to it, but as least there's a paper trail created by such a fraud that can be followed once it is discovered.

    Free TTY services be allowed to issue usernames and passwords to their customers, keep text logs of the conversations, and able to revoke the access of those who abuse their accounts. Basically, the laws that are requiring them to be open are also regulating this service to its death. This needs to be fixed quick.

    1. Re:No authentication leads to abuse... by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 2, Informative

      50 state governments are in the USA, not to mention countless county and city governments,
      all of which supply aid in some form to those with special needs.

      --
      Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    2. Re:No authentication leads to abuse... by Unnngh! · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I did a quick googling and found some statistics:

      http://www.access-board.gov/telecomm/marketrep/app endices/ttyvm.htm

      That's 200000-700000 people using an older type of tty terminal. Maintaining a database and logs for this many users alone is a fair-sized task, and the offices are distributed nationwide.

      I'm afraid a cost-benefit analysis would reveal that it's (currently) cheaper to let the scammers scam:(

    3. Re:No authentication leads to abuse... by Abm0raz · · Score: 2, Informative

      well, there's the federal, all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, several other protectorates. This doesn't count the several thousand county, township, borough, and city governments per state.

      -Ab

      --
      Nothing fails quite like prayer.
    4. Re:No authentication leads to abuse... by BlewScreen · · Score: 4, Insightful
      keep text logs of the conversations, and able to revoke the access of those who abuse their accounts.

      You can't be serious... Would you advocate keeping a log of every voice call as well, and revoking phone service from those who "abuse their accounts"???

      Who's going to define "abuse"? Can a TTY user have phone sex, or is this something the deaf shouldn't be allowed to access?

      -bs

      --
      That that is is not that that is not. That that is not is not that that is.
    5. Re:No authentication leads to abuse... by 77Punker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Credit card companies should handle credit scams; that's how they do it for non-TTY credit scammers.

    6. Re:No authentication leads to abuse... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Insightful? Last I checked, phone sex was not illegal whereas credit card and wire fraud are.

      I do, however, agree that logging calls is a very, very Bad Thing to do. The companies being scammed need to have safeguards in place to make sure they can not only recognize problems, but go back and figure out what happened, who did it, and where they are with the help of law enforcement.

      TTY ops are intermediaries. Their job is not to protect companies on one side of the line from fraud and vice versa. They are there to channel information, not concern themselves with its content.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    7. Re:No authentication leads to abuse... by Macgruder · · Score: 2, Informative

      Devil's Advocate here...

      Maybe we need to rethink the whole 'equal access' thing. Why jump through hoops to give the disabled to nearly every segment of society? So they can feel 'normal'? They aren't... that's part of the definition.

      I mean, what's the point? What is the justification here? I'm not asking this to make flames or troll here... I honestly want to know why this is considered to be a good and desirable thing?

      --
      I'm not crazy,I'm actively irresponsible.
    8. Re:No authentication leads to abuse... by abb3w · · Score: 5, Informative

      Free TTY services be allowed to issue usernames and passwords to their customers,

      Yes. Requiring some sort of proof that the service is needed as you suggest might also be desirable.

      keep text logs of the conversations,

      No.

      As I recall my sign language instructor explaining, the TTY Relay Service operator (and, I suppose, anything they might keep a hypothetical log with) is legally considered to be part of the telephone. They are NOT allowed to discuss anthing they hear; and any testimony they give about anything they have heard prior to a wiretap warrant being issued is legally inadmissable. You can be planning a murder, and the operator just has to relay the messages back and forth. It's a condition of legal privilege similar to those of spouses, doctors, lawyers, and the Secret Service.

      Allowing mandatory logging would effectively put a bug into the phone of every deaf person who has need of this service. Any regulation or legislation permitting this would be struck down in court as a violation of the equal protection and reasonable search clauses.

      As for the phone companies doing it themselves, they are under what is called "common carrier protection"-- they make no judgements over what to carry, they just send the voices back and forth, whether it's a call to mom or a death threat. Yes, harrassing calls are illegal, but the phone company only can take action AFTER the recipient complains. Logging, and revoking access based on use, would remove the Telco common carrier protection, and they REALLY don't want to do that. Not to mention the incidental that this might get them sued for civil rights violations under that pesky equal protection clause again.


      This report does lead me to wonder, however. I recall being informed by a professor who specializes in history of computing that the phone phreak community back in the 1970's to 1990s was had a very large blind community. While speculations on the cause of that are moot to the matter at hand, there might actually be a group of deaf/hard-of-hearing folk who are gathering around this new (and even less moral) illegal activity. If so, it would be depressing.

      Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, I just argue with one.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    9. Re:No authentication leads to abuse... by The_K4 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They will handle it, however they way that handle it is by forcing the merchant to give the money back to the person who's stolen card was used. Now the merchant is out moeny for falling for the scam (which is bad but partly their fault) and the deaf people still have long lines and a difficult time using services that are almost vital to them doing things you and I take for granted.

    10. Re:No authentication leads to abuse... by awtbfb · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's 200000-700000 people using an older type of tty terminal.

      Since this is /. I'll chime in here with some clarifying information. TTYs are not what most /.ers would consider a tty. To communicate with the old, unfortunately almost standard, Baudot style TTY, you need to buy a special modem. Baudot is dog slow (45.45 Baud) and a fast typist can easily out-type the protocol. At the receiving end it is incredibly painful to wait for someone to get through a long sentence. Newer, proprietary, fast protocols (e.g., TurboCode) have removed this bottleneck, but computer compatibility still requires hardware.

      This hardware requirement why internet relays are so nice - you can just use a regular computer without messing with extra gear and you can call from just about anywhere. Furthermore, you can now access the internet relays via smartphones and PDAs, thus giving users a truly mobile option.

    11. Re:No authentication leads to abuse... by bluGill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We don't give the disabled access to everything. Case in point: you do not see wheel chair bound workers placing the I beams of skyscrappers.

      We provide the disabled access where it is feasible. I know many hard of hearing (and a few deaf) people, and the majority are otherwise normal smart people. They can function in society with just a little help. Now I have a choice: I can give them money for food each day, or I can pay for a few things like TTY operators and let them then earn their living. The latter is cheaper, and gets beggars off the streets. (I prefer to leave that room for musicans who provide me a service in return for my money)

      Now there are also those who are deaf because of mental problems. That is a different situation. I'd prefer them off the streets though, (They would freeze in our winters) and most in limited ways are interesting people. We support them because it is the right thing. We give them TTY because it is not only cheaper than supporting them right out, but it lets them do something useful.

    12. Re:No authentication leads to abuse... by T-Ranger · · Score: 2, Interesting
      When was the last time you saw a merchant flip over your card and compare signatures?

      Iddiot CC merchants deserve what they get.

    13. Re:No authentication leads to abuse... by Buran · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've seen some suggestions here that look good, like requiring a note from an audiologist (mine would happily write a note for any service I did require) as is the case for handicapped parking placards/plates. It certainly would make sense to implement some such thing.

      Blind people and drivers licenses aren't quite the same as TTY services or closed captioning. If someone doesn't use TTY correctly or is deaf and doesn't use captioning, no one gets hurt -- but a person who can't see well enough to operate a car could hurt not only themselves but others, so the requirements are more strict. There are jobs I can't do (911 operator, for instance) because my disability could get someone hurt, and I recognize the necessity of the restrictions.

  2. What a horrible job. by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Let's describe the job of a Relay Operator:
    No matter what the phone call, or what the content of that phone call is, the Relay Operator must, by law continue the conversation.

    When a deaf person is feeling lonely they might decide to call a phone entertainment line, man or woman, having to type this in, and say what the deaf person types.

    Like the job of a relay operator isn't bad enough, now the operators have to deal with Nigerian poor grammer while perpetrating fraud.

    --
    Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    1. Re:What a horrible job. by JanneM · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um, yes. By law, and by the very job specification they had when applying, they do have to do this. It's not like it's a huge surprise, right: "Oh mai gahd! A human wants to talk about sex! With a member of the opposite gender!!"

      Assistants to disabled people have dealt with this for a long time; there is even accepted codes of conduct for various situations (basically, assistants should have a similar moral outlook as their bosses, or they will likely not be able to work together over time).

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    2. Re:What a horrible job. by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 4, Informative

      I worked as a relay operator for about 9 months before I quit because it was ridiculous.

      Mind you, this wasn't normal tty relay. This was IP-Relay, which allows anyone with a computer to use it as a tty basically.

      Because I've signed NDA's and don't really want to break federal law, I can't go into detail about any calls, but I think I can safely say that what the article describes is pretty accurate.

      Also, As for sex lines, that's not too common with IP-Relay. What is common though is bored high school kids calling each other and being very creative with what they make you say/type.

      It's funny for a while, and not that bad of a job, but a lot of it is tedious, dull, and annoying (Touchtone menus...AARGH).

      --
      //FIXME: Bad .sig
    3. Re:What a horrible job. by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 2, Funny

      OSR :-
      Bart :- First name Mike , last name roatch.
      Moe :- Hey everyone I am looking for Mike Roatch.
      Still cracks me up

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
  3. No different by JanneM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How is this different from the same scammers calling people with the same pitch?

    I would be a lot more worried about the idea of an outside party filtering my incoming calls without any control from me.

    More specifically, it is hard to have fun with phone salesmen or religious door-knockers once they learn to avoid you. :)

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    1. Re:No different by BCW2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The difference is that most small business owners have a concience and will bend over backwards to help someone they think is disabled. Then they get caught in the scam and lose.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    2. Re:No different by twbecker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The crime itself is the same but it's much harder for the retailer to be suspicious of an American operator who isn't speaking improper English with a heavy accent of some sort.

      --
      "The problem with internet quotations is that many are not genuine" -Abraham Lincoln
  4. We've gotten this by bravehamster · · Score: 5, Informative

    At the computer shop I run we've literally recieved hundreds of these phone calls. The conversation typically goes like this (but relayed, so it takes forever)

    Do you sell laptops?
    No, we don't sell any laptops.
    How about desktops?
    Yes, we do desktops.
    Will you ship overseas?
    No, no overseas shipments.
    Ok..ok...how about Los Angeles.
    We can do that.
    Ok, I have credit card, I can pay now.
    We'd need some sort of verification that you are the cardholder.

    The conversation goes downhill from there. The first few times we took it seriously, but since then we've refused to take relay calls. If we hear the operator say "This is a relay call" we interrupt and say "Sorry, we don't take relay calls" and then HANG UP. If you don't hang up, the operator will say "hold" while they type out the message and then wait for a response. Waste..of...goddamn...time. Slamming the reciever down helps. If there's any people who genuinely use the service...sorry, we just can't afford to spend hours wading through these phone calls to get to you.

    --
    ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    1. Re:We've gotten this by John_Sauter · · Score: 3, Funny
      I have gotten many such calls at my little computer shop. Sometimes I get into a sympathetic conversation with the operator, who is perfectly willing to tell me the caller is probably a fraud.

      I don't sell laptops and I don't ship overseas. If the caller asks why, I say that I am a retail store and prefer that my customers pick up their merchandise in person. My final defense, which I haven't had to use yet, is to say that I only sell the Commodore Amiga.
      John Sauter (J_Sauter@Empire.Net)

    2. Re:We've gotten this by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 4, Informative

      They could be fired/jailed for that. When I worked as a Relay Operator, the main things stressed were Confidentiality and Transparency. You are NEVER NEVER allowed to talk to either end. Your job is a telephone line. You can't answer questions, you can't do anything. If you get asked questions, you basically have to tell the person that you are a telephone line and don't know anything, and to ask the person who they are talking to. Or my favorite thing to do was just type the questions that they asked me to the TTY user.

      --
      //FIXME: Bad .sig
    3. Re:We've gotten this by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If there's any people who genuinely use the service...sorry, we just can't afford to spend hours wading through these phone calls to get to you.

      Thankfully, legitimate deaf people can use the internet to make their orders, a lot quicker I would guess.

    4. Re:We've gotten this by YaRness · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i don't think that would hold up under scrutiny. the deaf person can still come into the store and buy a computer.

    5. Re:We've gotten this by fo0bar · · Score: 4, Informative
      I have several deaf friends who use both TTY relay services and the newer internet relay services. And because of this, admittedly I use the internet relay services occasionally. While this is technically an abuse of the system, as I myself am not deaf, it can be a real convieience. One thing to mention, if you do use these services, deaf or not, is to be POLITE. Remember, this is a throwback of the original TTY services, so there is a certain formality to the conversation. Use the proper etiquette, and be sure to thank the CA (communication assistant) at the end of the conversation. This must be an incredibly boring and tedious job, so at lease use a little manners when dealing with them.

      That being said, I would recommend at least listening to the first sentence of the caller before thinking about hanging up. Just yesterday I called a local computer shop to check the price of a power supply, and the conversation was quick and polite. (I doubt nigerian scammers would want to buy a $60 power supply and ask about the store hours). Here's approximately how a conversation goes: (other end begins with a colon)

      : dialing... 1... 2... answered... (male) thank you for calling computershop inc. how can i help you q ga
      hello. what is your lowest price on a 500 watt power supply q ga
      : let me check one moment (hold music) I have one for 59 90 ga
      thank you. and what time are you open until tonight q ga
      : 6 pm ga
      thanks a lot ga to sk
      : thank you (call ended)
      : ga or sk
      ca thank you sk
      : sksk

      A little terminology: "ga" means "go ahead", "q ga" is asking a question, "ga to sk" is signaling that you wish to end the conversation ("sk" meaning "stop keying"), "ga or sk" is essentially the CA asking "is there anything else I can do for you?", at which point I thank him/her and signal the end of the conversation. "sksk" is the final signal that the conversation is over.

    6. Re:We've gotten this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
      as a CA you could be fired and perhaps jailed (I don't know the law) but in real life you almost certainly won't. I was a CA for a summer and yes they do stress confidentiality and transparency but in our office that rule was much more honored in the breach. Of the dozens of people working there only 2 were the hard-asses who would flat out refuse to relay anything that wasn't typed to them by the deaf person on the other and of the tty.

      Most hearing people who call the service make comments to the operator and most operators respond to them while remaining generally faithful to the fact that they're only supposed to be conduits. Because for a lot of people that's just human nature.

      Additionally, a lot of the deaf people have serious trouble with spelling and the operators have to puzzle out what they're trying to say. This involves some give-and-take with the hearing person on the phone which also often leads into those moments of operator to hearing person contact (it is VERY common for the hearing person to feel a little bad for the operator trying to make sense of badly mangled english and to make a to that effect meant only for the operator ... it might be horrible and illegal and jail-worthy in terms of the letter of the law, but that's not how it worked in every day practice when I was there)

      All that being said, everyone was faithful to the spirit of the endeavor, that of being a pass through. I'm not talking about long conversations between the operator and the hearing person, i'm talking about much smaller stuff.

  5. Free matter for the blind. by stankyho · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone else know about the "free matter for the blind" scam?

    I read about it several (over 15) years ago in some magazine. Basically when mailing a letter instead of a stamp you just write free matter for the blind.

    I think I may have tried it once back then to send myself a letter just to see if it worked. Can't remember if it did though.

    --

    ---
    eeww, I'll have a crab juice.
    1. Re:Free matter for the blind. by gklinger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's very interesting. I had never heard of such a thing but a web search revealed that it's true. Check out this document from the USPS that explains how it works. It's a real shame that programs and institutions created to help the physically challenged are being abused because the only thing that can come from this is dissolution of the programs and institutions.

  6. Some Good Examples of Deaf Relay (TTY) Abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Can be found here:

    http://phonelosers.org/sound.html

    Specifcally this one which would probably get you a trip to camp X-ray today

    Phone_Losers_of_America_0118_Deaf_Relay_Commuter_A irline.mp3

  7. Log today, spam tomorrow (or worse) by starsong · · Score: 5, Insightful

    keep text logs of the conversations

    This one doesn't make sense to me. Do the people who issue handicapped parking permits keep a list of the places people park? These conversations are often intensely personal; it's literally the only way some of these people can use a telephone. I agree completely with authentication, but keeping records seems intrusive and demeaning. And if they are kept, sooner or later the deaf will start getting "targeted" TTY advertisements...

    "You recently mentioned to your mother that you're thinking of moving. Contact Local Realtors Inc for a free consulation!", etc.

    To say nothing of the legal implications; a warrentless wiretap on thousands of American phones, always running, in plain-text, east-to-search format.

  8. 419 Scammers ? by FoxMcCloud · · Score: 3, Funny

    419 scammers and credit card thieves are abusing the US' TTY service ?
    Mh, I wonder how they counted that there were precisely 419 of them.

    --
    bool Marketoid::IsGood(){return IsDead();}
  9. I've had this happen where I work. by b00m3rang · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Someone supposedly calling from "Royal Oil" in Nigeria wanted to order 200 40GB hard drives, by credit card. We told them we only ship overseas if payment is made by wire transfer. Another hint was that it's unlikely an oil company would resort to using a yahoo email address (royaliol@). They called back several times, but we obviously wouldn't budge.

    The most annoying part was the amount of time it took to complete the calls. I can't be rude to a /possibly/ legitimate caller by hanging up, but the translation process takes a while... especially when they're probably on several calls and don't get back to the terminal by the time it's their turn to talk.

  10. ofcourse by Wouter+Van+Hemel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Last year I had to track down some carders operating from the US, who were trying to buy products here in Europe with stolen and/or generated credit card numbers. It makes sense to pull that stunt with people (read: jurisdiction) far from your own home...

    You know how difficult (and expensive) it is to both track down the people and get a conviction? Laws are made on a national level, institutions such as police and justice departements are also pretty much bound to their specific country (unless you just act as if you own the world), hence international crime has little or no resistance. I mean, why would you care if the crime has been committed elsewhere?...

    Same with spam, really. Most spam I receive comes from scumbags on US soil, and it's pretty hard to harm them from here. As opposed to local spammers: a friend of mine once made a real-life visit when he received a spam email from a company not far from where he lives. He didn't get any spam anymore from that company.

    That might be a viable solution to the spam problem anyway: just a global team-up of people willing to visit spammers living close to their own home. I'm not implying a violent posse here. Even a criminal would get a clue when there's suddenly a bunch of very pissed off people in front of his/her door.

  11. Yes, Hang up! by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you don't want to take the call, the best thing you can do is hang up. It saves the operator (me at one time) a lot of time and frustration.

    If the person calls back 2 or 3 times, you might want to take the call, however. The scammers/people who aren't who they say they are won't have you do that. The real deaf people are used to that, so they have you call back a few times in hopes to get a different person who will take the call, or give you a chance to convince the person to talk.

    But if you still have no intention of taking the call, just hang up, saying as little as possible.

    It saves the operators a lot of trouble.

    --
    //FIXME: Bad .sig
  12. Simple Fix... by zulux · · Score: 2, Insightful



    Here's a simple fix:

    Change the TTY/Realy number to a 1-900 numner and charge calls from whereever ther're made. Say $1.00 a minuite.

    Then every month - Registered and bonified deaf people can submit a copy of their telephone invoice to the Federal Government and get a refund check for the amount used.

    People who abuse the system without being daaf get to pay for it - deaf people get this vital service for free.

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    1. Re:Simple Fix... by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 2, Informative

      That doesnt work at all.

      What they use is the free internet relay service, which lets you use your computer as a TTY.

      www.ip-relay.com is one.

      ATT also has one, someone earlier posted the URL.

      --
      //FIXME: Bad .sig
    2. Re:Simple Fix... by elmegil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some variation of this may be workable but I see two big problems as stated: 1) it requires all Deaf to register. Imagine if you were talking about Japanese, or African American, or Gun Owners instead... 2) not all Deaf are going to be able to put the money up front, especially if for some reason they have an especially heavy call volume (say a death in the family, or whatever). Imagine if you had to do this for your phone bill, paying the phone company in advance for what you might use and then getting refunds....

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  13. Easy solution? by rjelks · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can't the merchants just require the 3-digit security code on the back of the credit cards , if they're losing money?

  14. I don't think you understand by kurisuto · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm hearing. My boyfriend is deaf. I can pick up any voice phone, call the relay service, and use it to call my boyfriend. The CA types what I say, and reads to me what my boyfriend types back.

    How would you put a password protection on this? Would every hearing person have to register a spoken password to be able to call a deaf person?

    The point of the relay service is to allow deaf and hearing people equal access to the phone system. If I need a password to call a deaf person but not a hearing person, that's hardly equal access.

    Deaf people would never stand for such unequal treatment. They would be even more insulted if you said that they can't take care of themselves by screening their own scammers as hearing people do.

    1. Re:I don't think you understand by abb3w · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I need a password to call a deaf person but not a hearing person, that's hardly equal access.

      Not that I think the idiot plan of logging is anything other than an idiot plan, but I thing they're only talking about requiring a name and password for a deaf person to call out, not requiring a password to call a deaf person.

      I admit, this is still not equal access: the deaf will need to (briefly) identify themselves and provide proof of their identity (the password) to make a phone call, where the hearing do not. On the other hand, it seems a minimal obstacle. On the gripping hand, I'm not deaf, and won't be for about another 50 years judging by family history, so I'm not the one to judge that.
      On yet another arm of my octopus, I'm not sure that such passwords would do any good; they would become a prime target for a new form of identity theft, just like social security numbers and mother's maiden names are now.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  15. legality of aiding in illgeal things by bsDaemon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the operator is, by law, required to facilitate the conversation, what happens if it is blatantly illegal, such as a terrorist plot, or a deal for kiddy porn or drugs? the operator is required to keep the conversation confidentail? It is not like there can't be deaf criminals. And besides, if these people are not even deaf, what is to say that the same thing can not be done by criminals or terrorists?
    is the opperator still required to facilitate the conversation and keep quiet? isn't that then like, being an accessory to the crime, maybe even conspiricy? If they call the police, then is that evidence or witness testimony inadmissible for breaking the confidentiality of the service?

    1. Re:legality of aiding in illgeal things by sky_fire · · Score: 2, Informative

      I used to work for the Relay service and it was illegal to report ANYTHING short of a bomb threat on the facility you are currently working in. As far as the legality is concerned the relay agent is nothing more than a piece of the wire. They keep grief counselors on campus all the time because of some of the crap we had to relay.

      Even judges can't legally compell agents to do anything other than relay the conversation. I had one attempt to swear me in once before he would let me relay the call. The manager of my center had to quote to law to the judge before he would give up on insisting I had to be sworn in.
      (and since I wasn't actively relaying a conversation no this isn't confidential.)

      Of course this may have changed since the whole terrorism acts but I doubt it. The advocates are relatively powerful for keeping agents as nothing more than a piece of the wire.

      --
      -- Proud member of the Jello Sex Cult.
  16. Big money maker for companies providing relay by yarrick · · Score: 3, Insightful
    But Internet relay service makes up a minuscule fraction of revenues for Sprint, said company spokesman Steve Lunceford.

    "It's not a financial thing for us," he said.

    That's totally false. I used to work for an internet relay company as a relay operator (*cough* begins with an M ends with an I *cough*). Here's the plain and simple facts of it:

    Relay companies get paid XX amount of dollars per day, assuming they can meet a certain service level. They have to answer calls queued into their system within a certain period of time. Every call that isn't answered is counted against their running total.

    If a relay company falls below a certain percent (it's around 80% or so in a 24 hour period of time), they receive NO MONEY for that day. For the company I worked at, they had 1 day last year where they failed to maintain the standard. The amount of money lost for 1 day? Approaching $3 million according to management.

    Anyone saying that business isn't a money making enterprise is full of BS.

  17. Re:DEAF AND DUMB by winkydink · · Score: 2, Funny

    Helen Keller. I would however be hard-pressed to name a smart AC.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  18. Alternate solution? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2

    SMS. I noticed a deaf guy at a bar the other night thumbing away on his cellphone. Evidently having a very good conversation with whomever. I thought "now THERE is a good use for that technology". Obviously, the person on the other end needs one too, but it removes the relay person from the middle of the conversation.

  19. Re:DEAF AND DUMB by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 2, Funny

    How about AC Green? Played lots of professional basketball, is now a motivation speaker and business owner, and zero kids out of wedlock.

  20. Re:TTY stands for by Neil+Blender · · Score: 2, Informative

    TTY = Teletypewriter

  21. You think you have it bad... by cspenn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a student loan company, we get an enormous number of these calls every week. Every time we have a new hire, we have to take at least half a day of training to educate them on the various ways that overseas scammers will attempt to take advantage of phone reps. The TTY server, and AT&T's Internet Relay service, are badly abused. It's to the point now where we are considering a voice message to direct the rare legitimate TTY-necessary customer to either email or fax options - at least with those options, we can blacklist originating exchanges (outside the US) or on spam lists.

    It's really sad, but there will always be those whose work ethic embodies the tragedy of the commons to the fullest.

  22. sites fighting the 419 scammers by chongo · · Score: 2, Informative
    Some people are fighting back against the 419 scammers. For general information about fighting 419 scam: Here are a few sites dedicated to exposing 419 scammers in an interesting and/or amusing way:
    --
    chongo (was here) /\oo/\
  23. Re:Why? by idesofmarch · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I thought about this for a long time too. I am a little surprised the article does not get into that more. Here is what I can come up with:

    First, I think you are right about the accents. Because the scammers are pretending to be Americans (possessing credit cards of Americans) they would have a harder time on the phone, with their accents. Also, the call is free, as best as I can tell. Finally, I think there is the additional degree of anonymity, because there is no call to trace. I can only conclude that these advantages outweigh the unusual nature of the relay call.

  24. I, sirs, am a relay operator. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    So I have to put in my 250,000 lira. Mind you, this is never going to be noticed, due to my happy anonymity.

    BUT:

    I work for MCI Worldcom as a relay operator. More specifically, the California Relay Service (CRS). Our center handles calls from IP-RELAY.com (so do the Arizona Relay, the Tennessee Relay, and the Wisconsin Relay, if anyone cares). So all day, it's prank calls and Nigerian scammers. There are a few deaf people using the service, but not many. The signal-to-noise ratio is much too low, so to speak. I make a few measly dollars and hour to put up with this sort of shit. (But at least the health benefits are okay)

    It's always Ghanans and Nigerians. Every single fucking time. Not Koreans or Israelis or anyone else. Most are in Accra, Ghana.

    They buy very few computers, despite what the article says. Mostly, they call printing shops to order blank T-shirts. I'm not really very sure why printing, silkscreening, and embroidery shops would even sell blank white T-shirts in the first place, but they do. Did I mention it's always XXL and XXXL shirts? Don't let those Sally Struthers commercials fool you; people in Ghana are fucking CHUBBY.

    Today, it was wedding dresses. I'm curious why people don't get suspicious when someone wants to order 6 wedding gowns over the phone. Especially when they don't care what sizes or styles, just the price. Not extra large, though, oddly enough, so maybe they're not all as chubby as it seems.

    Some days it's shoes. Some days it's designer perfume. Or gold wristwatches. And some days it is in fact computers.

    And 99% of the time, the credit card is declined. And 90% of the time when that happens, the fucking moron at whichever shop I'm calling will actually ask the person if they have another card. They always have a spare, sometimes with a completely different name.

    Things to look for, if you're a store:

    - The scammer will always ask to have the shop run the credit card while they are on the line. This means, in stores with only one line, that the credit card machine will AUTOMATICALLY approve the card if it passes whatever obscure checksum process they go through. Nice trick.

    - The scammer will, if pressed for a phone number, say that it's not currently working. They don't claim to be deaf and have no phone, which is actually pretty common among the deaf. Instead, they give a phone number with too many digits to be a US number, or an email address. This email address will be composed of a foreign-sounding name, but it will NOT match the name the person gave on the card.

    - The total price will be just shy of $10,000 to avoid hitting the card's limit, OR it will be some multiple of that, and the scammer will have several cards.

    So, every now and then the scammer gets someone to ship him something, be it a half dozen BMW radiators or a $9000.00 Bernina commercial grade sewing machine. He gets his payoff. Congratulations, you stupid sons of bitches, you've successfully stolen things. What do you do with the money?

    You give it to terrorists, of course, so they can go to pilot school. Allah Akbar! (or whatever) Thank goodness for weak extradition treaties, otherwise this wouldn't be possible.

    So do the executives at MCI know about all of this? Of course. The government is giving them a whole fucking load of money every day to keep the relay centers open. Hope it's worth it, guys. As for me, I'm out of there as soon as I get my book written (never).