Slashdot Mirror


A Movie From Before Movies Were Invented

Alien54 writes "Two astronomers at the Lick Observatory on Mt. Hamilton near San Jose have discovered a set of 147 plates taken of the transit of Venus in 1882. They've assembled them into a Quicktime movie! Think about it. This is a movie from before movies were invented. As a point of comparison, Edison didn't get his films going until the 1890s. This is just around the time when Muybridge was doing his work on the motion of horses and people."

161 comments

  1. Yeah, but by jabbadabbadoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm pretty sure there's plates of porn somewhere from the 17'th century. They're always the first ones to use new technology.

    1. Re:Yeah, but by AdamInParadise · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Porn was found in the remains of Pompei. I'm pretty sure someone will come up with a sample of Egyptian porn (being 2000BC).

      Now does anyone have an example of Neoholitic porn? Goddess of fertility doesn't count.

      --
      Nobox: Only simple products.
    2. Re:Yeah, but by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      There are statuettes from the bronze age that experts are sure were porn.

    3. Re:Yeah, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Heh. There are irish statues from the neolithic (stone age farming period) that experts _say_ their usual "must have been of religious significance" - but are pretty blatantly stone age porn...

    4. Re:Yeah, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Yeah, but by S.O.B. · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there was some porn cave paintings.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    6. Re:Yeah, but by Psykosys · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There are many different theories about the Venus statues - they are not necessarily all portrayals of the "fertility goddess", and it has often been suggested that some of the statues, with their exagerrated breasts + genitals, were indeed used in the same way that porn is today.

    7. Re:Yeah, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There actually was a discovery of an ancient Egyptian papyrus, with all of this porn on it. I am talking really kinky stuff. I can't rememeber any details though, anyone have URLs?

      There is also tons of evidence in India of ancient porn carvings. I am talking about group sex, bestiality, homosexuality, etc...

    8. Re:Yeah, but by Xzzy · · Score: 1

      I don't know that neolithic porn was neccessary because equal rights weren't a terribly contemporary idea back then.

      I figure the guy could just demand the gal strip, and if she refused he just cracked her over the head with something heavy and did it for her.

    9. Re:Yeah, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, like in the film Mannequin?

    10. Re:Yeah, but by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Now does anyone have an example of Neoholitic porn?"

      Here ya go!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    11. Re:Yeah, but by Klanglor · · Score: 1

      actualy porn became all mighty and powerfull only after it became taboo... why get porn when you could have the real thing?

    12. Re:Yeah, but by FoxMcCloud · · Score: 1

      And don't forget that one either.

      --
      bool Marketoid::IsGood(){return IsDead();}
  2. prior art! by Neophytus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Looks like the USPTO need to look at any patents on quicktime again!

    1. Re:prior art! by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Quictime Alternative
      it's a package containing Media Player Classic, a codec and a plugin for moz/opera.

  3. Another blow for Edisons patent portfolio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yet more prior art discovered.

    1. Re:Another blow for Edisons patent portfolio by Seby123456 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How is this 'prior art'? Its a series of stills which were put together into movie form only very recently. The stills themselves do not make up a film, and never were a film at the date they were taken.

      Now whether there are any copyright issues may be another question...

    2. Re:Another blow for Edisons patent portfolio by Czernobog · · Score: 1

      Interesting... See, movies are sequences of frames. And *Shock* *Horror* the frames are stills!

      --
      /. Where the truth
    3. Re:Another blow for Edisons patent portfolio by xigxag · · Score: 1

      How did the parent get modded as "insightful"? In fact, it seems the very opposite of insightful since he fails to realize that the post he was replying to was just a joke. One fscking obvious clue being that Edison's patent portfolio expired a long time ago.

      Anyway, Venus in transit...booooring...wake me up when they find Percival Lowell's time-lapse photos of the green men taking down their Martian canals.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    4. Re:Another blow for Edisons patent portfolio by freeweed · · Score: 1

      What's scary is that if today's copyright laws were around back then, it's very likely that these things wouldn't be in the public domain yet.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    5. Re:Another blow for Edisons patent portfolio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am pretty sure the astronomers who took these pics intended it to look at as an animated sequence.

    6. Re:Another blow for Edisons patent portfolio by Seby123456 · · Score: 1

      But the technological leap required to make a movie is the ability to show those sequences of frames quickly and seamlessly - not the actual stills themselves.

    7. Re:Another blow for Edisons patent portfolio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ho ho ho.

      Of course Edison never patented the idea of sequenced pictures. Back then, a patent applied to a general class of apparatus.

      For example of how this amazing system worked, see: an Apparatus for Exhibiting Photographs of Moving Objects

    8. Re:Another blow for Edisons patent portfolio by cmacb · · Score: 1

      I think the post was a joke, and if so, a very good one. Humor check.

  4. Somewhere... by FrostedWheat · · Score: 5, Funny

    A sysadmin for Sky and Telescope just sat down for Easter dinner, and then his beeper goes ....

    1. Re:Somewhere... by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      The world is round you pre-Columbus clod. It is tonight in my timezone.

    2. Re:Somewhere... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2, Informative

      The world is round you pre-Columbus clod

      Plenty of pre-Columbus clods knew the world was round. Erastothanes in 230 BC made a fairly accurate measurement of the circumference, you insensitive clod.

    3. Re:Somewhere... by valdis · · Score: 1
      Contrary to popular belief, Queen Isabella knew damned well the world was round. She also knew that the Far East was some 10K miles east of her, and that the world was some 25K miles around, meaning a 15K mile ocean voyage going west. Isabella also knew just how far a ship could make it on the provisions it could carry, and it was closer to 5K miles tops than the 15K required.


      This fool Columbus thought the world was only 14K miles or so, leaving a 4K mile voyage west. So Isabella sent him off with 3 leaky ships and a bunch of convicts, figuring they'd either starve or sink 5K miles out, and good riddance to the lot of them. As it was, he got very lucky in finding that previously unknown set of islands when he did....

  5. Makes me wonder by kalidasa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If, when they took these plates, it occurred to them that sooner or later someone would do this. There were already animation techniques involving revolving stills (the Zoetrope, for instance).

    1. Re:Makes me wonder by wass · · Score: 1
      What about flipbooks? You know, a 'pad' of pictures where you flip through it, controlling the flipping speed with your thumb. You get about a 2 second movie this way. I remember having some Disney ones when I was little.

      In the Broadway Play 'Ragtime', they talk about an immigrant that invented such flipbooks (eventually making his fortune), but I don't know the year or how true to history the play was.

      --

      make world, not war

  6. It isn't really a movie by christurkel · · Score: 4, Informative

    Its a series of photographs assembled into a movie 116 years later. They didn't make a movie of it at the time. Still cool, though.

    --

    CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
    1. Re:It isn't really a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      A movie IS a series of photographs... the difference is that it becomes a movie if you show them in a certain fashion.

    2. Re:It isn't really a movie by azzy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the grand-parent has a valid point. You can't call a set of still images a movie just because they can be put together and made into a movie. Intention of creation plays an important role. Otherwise you could call any series of static pictures that show some change or story a movie. And such things date back much further.. from the top of my head I am thinking of the Bayeux Tapestry.. indeed any tapestries depicting stories, even prehistoric cave art; man with spear, man throws spear, dead animal.

    3. Re:It isn't really a movie by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      Your example, though, isn't at all the same, though. It's more than just a series of stills that make a movie. The stills, when assembled, have to appear fluid enough to be real-life like in appearance. From this, you could argue webcams generally don't make movies. Comics aren't movies either. But, if you put enough stills together you can make a flip-book, which is a really small movie (though admittedly, animated generally).

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    4. Re:It isn't really a movie by K8Fan · · Score: 1
      I think the grand-parent has a valid point. You can't call a set of still images a movie just because they can be put together and made into a movie. Intention of creation plays an important role

      It's an interesting point - is it the person who originally had te idea, or the person who first successfully made it work. For instance, John Logie Baird actually made the very first video recordings, decades before anyone else managed it. But he wasn't able to play them back because he didn't have a way to syncronize the recorded signal to his display device. Is half of an invention enough?

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    5. Re:It isn't really a movie by Forgotten · · Score: 1
      If you RTFA, you find that the pictures may in fact have been taken with that intention:

      As we looked at Todd's extensive sequence of images, we realized we could turn them into a movie. A similar thought may have occurred to Todd himself, for a number of his contemporaries were already making the first forays into chronophotography -- the recording of sequential motion and the forerunner of cinematography. Indeed, Pierre Jules Janssen invented his famous photographic revolver to capture the 1874 transit of Venus.

      But intent notwithstanding, the point really is that it's chronophotography. A set of consecutive images isn't a movie, but a set of images with time series data is. This is why the format this movie is in is called "QuickTime" (after "QuickDraw").

      By taking the images and carefully recording the time at which each was taken, Todd made a movie. It could have been played back right then in flip-book fashion, and odds are it was - let alone with a zoetrope-style revolver.

    6. Re:It isn't really a movie by azzy · · Score: 1

      No need to get offensive.. do remmeber what the F stands for.

      > A similar thought may have occurred to Todd himself

      However, it's entirely possible that the thought didn't occur to Todd.

      It's possible a caveman once got high on magic mushrooms and envisioned someone converting his cave paintings into a film.. or it's possibl;e he just used whatever artistic means were available to him at the time and had to make do.

      Now.. it doesn't matter /when/ Todd made these images, the movie itself was made rather recently, and so it is not a 'movie from before movies were invented'.

      Now.. the first move ever invented.. /that/ is arguably the first ever movie from /before/ they were invented.

    7. Re:It isn't really a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No need to get offensive.. do remmeber what the F stands for.

      Sorry if I did - I don't even sound out RTFA any more. It also stands for "fine", "funky", or any other adjective you please beginning with F, of course. ;)

      Now.. it doesn't matter /when/ Todd made these images, the movie itself was made rather recently, and so it is not a 'movie from before movies were invented'.

      This is really just semantics. I take a wider view of what makes a "movie" - if all the source material is there (frame images, time data) then the movie is made. What was done more recently was a particular presentation of the movie, but that's merely a display mechanism, not the movie itself. It's a bit analogous to writing a play, and then performing it. The troupe on stage doesn't invent the play, they merely render it for a particular audience. Likewise an arrangement of music.

      Nonetheless, another valid viewpoint is that the images are only raw material, and every subsequent translation into a particular movie format is a new movie - albeit certainly a derivative work. I just don't find that as useful a definition of "movie".

      I agree that it wasn't a movie from before movies were invented, though, because zoetropes, flipbooks, and similar devices were around long before that. To my mind there is no effective difference between a flipbook and a film projector in defining a movie, so movies were invented long ago, possibly before the printing press.
  7. direct links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:direct links by trompete · · Score: 1

      Does anybody setup torrents anymore, or is that just a thing of the past? I noticed that peer guardian went nuts blocking hosts when I used bittorrent last time.

    2. Re:direct links by s2kPirate · · Score: 0

      gee-willikers batman! grab the popcorn and a blanket, it's movie warchin' time! (launching Quicktime...ooh, aah! ~brushed steel~)

    3. Re:direct links by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Jeezus FRIK'N christ! Even the damn direct .MOV link's don't work unless you accept cookies.

      Sometimes I'd really like a chance to bop website designers over the head.

      At this site they claim they want the cookies so that you don't have to re-enter latitude/longitude information for certain features. Yeah, right, whatever. But there's no damn reason the rest of the site shouldn't work. Hell, the entire website should work. If I try to use a feature that uses latitude and longitude, and I don't have cookies on, then it's my own damn problem if I have to re-enter the data more than once.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  8. Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not quite prior art, but I remember doodling sequential drawings on the page edges of my textbooks... Does it count as parallel development?

    1. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not quite prior art, but I remember doodling sequential drawings on the page edges of my textbooks... Does it count as parallel development?

      Depends on whether you were doing it in the 19th century.

    2. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there were kinescopes and flipbooks in the 13th century.

  9. Muybridge by PollGuy · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is just around the time when Muybridge was doing his work on the motion of horses and people.

    For those who don't know this reference, it is to Eadweard Muybridge, an American immigrant from Britain who created created the first prototypical movie in the 1870, well before Edison or the Lumiere brothers, by having multiple cameras expose in sequence. He was asked to settle a bet on whether all four of a galloping horse's feet are ever all off the ground at the same time.

    1. Re:Muybridge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      "by having multiple cameras expose in sequence"

      So like bullet time then? So the Matrix is sort of Muybridge Reloaded?

    2. Re:Muybridge by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      Actually, yes. IIRC, he used tripwires strung across the track to trigger the cameras. The horse ran by, hit the string, and the camera took a picture.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    3. Re:Muybridge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Trotting
      Anders Eg

    4. Re:Muybridge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      edison was a schill. the schyster did not invent the motion pictured he patented them.
      as he did with a lot of things.
      plaese dont buy into the elemntary school propaganda ladled out into school.

      amaeroca did invent lots of extremely cool things as made admirably significant cultural contributions in the 19th and 20th century and now dominates alot of innovation as well as being largely responsible for much of media orientated technical output.

    5. Re:Muybridge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course Edison didn't patent moving pictures... he patented various devices for viewing and producing moving pictures. Duh.

      That said, you are correct that he patented many devices that he did not invent himself... generally because those devices were made by people working in his lab.

      It's sorta like how Rutherford scattering was first seen not by Rutherford, but by one of his grad students.

    6. Re:Muybridge by cei · · Score: 1

      Very much so. To the point that when I first started studying Muybridge recently, I began to wonder what new innovations might be in the Virtual Camera patents. I'm really not seeing them...

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    7. Re:Muybridge by Tokerat · · Score: 1


      Kind of ironic that the latest in special effects was invented before motion picture cameras...

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  10. wow by kalpol · · Score: 1

    Venus hasn't aged a bit!

    --
    12:50 - press return.
  11. Slashdotted by kantai · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sky&Tele: Hey, uh Mike
    SysAdmin: Ya?
    Sky&Tele: See, we have this little problem....
    SysAdmin: How bad could it possibl...well, damn.

    1. Re:Slashdotted by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Sky&Tele: On the bright side I've got a bag of marshmellows in back.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  12. Better still.... by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny

    Its a Quicktime clip made 109 years before Quicktime 1.0 was released! Or at least thats as true as it being a movie made prior to movies being invented.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  13. Re:i refuse to install quicktime. its malware by nutznboltz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Use mplayer on Linux then.

  14. Prior art? by guttergod · · Score: 0

    Finally!! This has to qualify as prior art? How many patents can we nullify with this kind of evidence?

    --

    Apple built a platform for their ideas, Google built one for everyone's.

  15. Galileo's sunspots by apothoray · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How about Galielo's Sunspots from 1612. Really, any 2D, time series data can be considered a "movie".

    1. Re:Galileo's sunspots by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You could make it into a movie.

    2. Re:Galileo's sunspots by Polo · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that qualify as a cartoon (since it's hand-drawn)

    3. Re:Galileo's sunspots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And cartoons can't be movies?

  16. /.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Reanimating the 1882 Transit of Venus
    By Anthony Misch


    In late 1882, Massachusetts astronomer David Peck Todd traveled to California to photograph the transit of Venus from the summit of Mount Hamilton, where a solar photographic telescope made by the renowned optical firm Alvan Clark & Sons waited among the stacks of bricks and timbers from which Lick Observatory was rising. As the transit unfolded on December 6th, Todd obtained a superb series of plates under perfect skies. His 147 glass negatives were carefully stored in the mountain vault, but as astronomers turned to other techniques for determining the scale of the solar system (see "The Transit of Venus: Tales from the 19th Century," by William Sheehan, Sky & Telescope: May 2004, page 32), the plates lay untouched and were eventually forgotten.

    Fast-forward 120 years. Spurred by a reference in one of Todd's letters in Lick's Mary Lea Shane Archives, Bill Sheehan and I found all 147 negatives, still in good condition, at the observatory. To our knowledge, this collection of photos constitutes the most complete surviving record of a historical transit of Venus.

    As we looked at Todd's extensive sequence of images, we realized we could turn them into a movie. A similar thought may have occurred to Todd himself, for a number of his contemporaries were already making the first forays into chronophotography -- the recording of sequential motion and the forerunner of cinematography. Indeed, Pierre Jules Janssen invented his famous photographic revolver to capture the 1874 transit of Venus.

    Digital imaging technology made reanimating Todd's transit images a comparatively simple undertaking. The result, which premiered at the International Astronomical Union's general assembly in Sydney in July 2003, shows Venus's silhouette flickering strangely as it marches across the Sun's face. It's the shadow-show of an astronomical event that occurred when Queen Victoria sat on the throne of Great Britain and Chester Arthur was president of the United States -- a moving record of an event seen by no one now living, and a preview of what millions will see for the first time on June 8, 2004.

    Figures:
    http://skyandtelescope.com/mm_images/6469.jpg
    Amherst College astronomer David Peck Todd (1855-1939). Courtesy the Mary Lea Shane Archives of Lick Observatory / University of California, Santa Cruz.

    http://skyandtelescope.com/mm_images/6465.jpg
    The December 6, 1882, transit of Venus was already under way when the Sun rose over Lick Observatory in California and David Peck Todd began photographing the planet's march across the solar disk. Todd's 147 surviving photos, of which these are numbered 11, 88, and 151 (left to right), have been turned into a movie. You can download QuickTime versions in two sizes: 640 x 480 pixels (4.0 megabytes) or 320 x 240 pixels (1.2 megabytes). © 2003 University of California Observatories / Lick Observatory.


    Movies:
    640x480 (4.0MB)
    320x240 (1.2MB)

  17. Re:you silly amateurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, is this Amsterdam Vallon again? 'Sup, dude?

  18. Re:i refuse to install quicktime. its malware by nkh · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I can't! This damned site told me I was blocking cookies... I'll /. them anyway!

  19. Edisson did not invent the film camera by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, maybe he did (or somebody under his employment did), but he wasn't the first.

    Behold the brothers Lumière!

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Edisson did not invent the film camera by chrysalis · · Score: 1

      Edison himself didn't invent anything.
      He was more a businessman and a mediatic man than anything else.
      Real guys under his employment like Tesla actually discovered amazing things, but Edison made his best to hide the facts.

      --
      {{.sig}}
    2. Re:Edisson did not invent the film camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you're going to get into this, here's some prior art for ya...

      George Eastman invented flexible photographic film around 1884, and patented a film camera in 1888.

      Perhaps you have heard of the company he founded, "Eastman Kodak". It makes film, among other things.

    3. Re:Edisson did not invent the film camera by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      George Eastman invented flexible photographic film around 1884, and patented a film camera in 1888.

      Fascinating.

      That has nothing to do with the subject at hand (moving pictures), but you get a C for effort. Now run along...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    4. Re:Edisson did not invent the film camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I'm not an expert on film history (of course) but going by the link you provide these brothers made their first movie in 1895. The info I googled on Edison states that he was working on a film camera in 1888 and recorded his first film shorts in 1891. So it looks like he (or somebody in his employ) was still the first.

    5. Re:Edisson did not invent the film camera by rduke15 · · Score: 1

      Yes, Edison invented a relatively modern camera and showed films first, but only to one viewer at a time.

      What the Lumiere brothers invented (among other things) is a camera that could also be used as a projector (and which they called "cinematographe"). With it, they made the first public projection, on a big screen, of a motion picture movie.

    6. Re:Edisson did not invent the film camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok. Thanks for the info.

  20. Edison first? by Aphrika · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Eadweard Muybridge had 'films' of walking nude women and trotting horses sorted in 1878 - in fact, he was the guy that helped Leland Stanford win a bet proving that a horse momentarily has all its hooves off the ground when it runs. I vaguely remember an interactive CD-ROM from the early 90's with this stuff on.

    Edisons Kinetoscope was demonstrated in 1891 - a good 13 years later. That said, at the time there was a lot of parallel development going on. It's also hard to quantify what exactly cinema was defined as back then. People were coming at it from all sorts of angles - photography, illustration, zoetropes, etc etc.

    Actually, for something truly amazing (but slightly offtopic), have a look at Sergei Mikhailovich Prokudin-Gorskii's photos of Russia at the trun of the 19th century. This guy was a bit before his time. He took 3 still images of his subject using black and white film and red, green and blue filters. Then he'd project all three images onto a screen to show people... colour photographs! The site has some absolutely stunning images. Worth a look.

    1. Re:Edison first? by dhclab49 · · Score: 1

      "turn of the 19th century" would typically mean "when the 19th century began" -- i.e. 1800 -- whereas the photos you linked are from the early 1900's. Neat anyway.

    2. Re:Edison first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Color photographs from before they invented colors.

    3. Re:Edison first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please send me naked lady.

    4. Re:Edison first? by GarthSweet · · Score: 1

      Okay this Sergei Mikhailovich Prokudin-Gorskii guy is freakin cool. What an awesome trick to come up with back then.

      True Genius!

    5. Re:Edison first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please send me naked lady

      Here ya go.

      [This is evidently the "Hampster Dance" version.]

    6. Re:Edison first? by Galvatron · · Score: 1
      I have to assume that it didn't work very well back then though, since no one else adopted it. In fact, if you look at their page on how these were recreated, you can see that before computers did contrast and color adjustment, the image is pretty muddy. We certainly owe him a debt of gratitude for making these images, but it seems likely that his contemporaries were not impressed.

      (As an aside, anyone else feel like they're looking at some sort of a reenactment, like Disneyland's Frontiertown or something? I'm just so used to B&W=old that these brilliant color images really throw me for a loop)

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    7. Re:Edison first? by bravehamster · · Score: 1

      Holy crap! Those pictures were amazing. Thank you.

      --
      ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    8. Re:Edison first? by Resound · · Score: 1

      Ok, you just broke me. I'm a sucker for historical photgraphy and I just got transported back in time a century. Absosmegginlutely amazing. Does anyone have anything else even remotely like this?

    9. Re:Edison first? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > have a look at Sergei Mikhailovich Prokudin-Gorskii's photos

      WOW. Simply amazing. I've never been much for photography as art, but some of those images are stunning. In some of them, the colors almost seem "more real" than color photos from today. I especially like the close-up images with water, as the time between snaps on moving water creates an awesome unintentional rainbow effect in the river. It makes the photos sorta mysterious looking. Thank you VERY much for the awesome link.

  21. Read: by reub2000 · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's a boring news day so we're going to post something crap about a movie made before movies that no one cares about.

  22. cookie etiquette by fermion · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Can anyone tell me why designers set up sites to store cookies prior to delivering any data? To me this is so ignorant. I mean how many times have you been surfing for information or a product, click a link, and have a cookie request pop up. You don't know the site from Adam, you don't know if it is going to have anything useful. You have no way to decide, as no content has been delivered. You don't want to have to go and delete the cookie or change the settings. I mean after all you just want to look for a second. They don't ask you for an ID when you browse at the mall. Some shady car dealers do this, but when they do i tell them to fuck off and go somewhere else.

    So, being a prudent surfer, you deny the cookie. I mean how useful can a site be if they won't even allow a page to render before setting a cookie. This is one of the first rules of usability. Before asking the user to do anything, the site must clearly establish a benefit. I mean if I accepted every cookie of every site that wanted to set it before rendering I would have hundreds of useless site cookies. Much of the time I look at the page, decide it is useless, and go on my way.

    So to those of you who are currently in the middle of this modern client/server design, why do require a token even before the user has a chance to establish the identify of the website.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:cookie etiquette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never worked in a stateless environment have you?
      Assuming there is a purpose for the cookie in the first place, when would you like them to send it?
      Once the page is loaded and you have decided if you like it, its too late.

    2. Re:cookie etiquette by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 1

      Your advice might make sense if you're going to
      www.skyandtelescope.com/index.html

      but if you're going to .../april04/11/1.jsp
      it's a completely different story.

      You really don't have any other choices in a stateless environment.

      Think about it like this. It's as if you're just browsing through the stores in the mall, but instead of going through the front door, you're mulling in the back trying to crawl in through the window.

      It's just a cookie. Make a shortcut to the folder and delete by date or write a cron job. Heck, if I was creating sky and telescope's site, I'm not going to be worrying about "cookie ettiquete". I'd probably be busy designing a method to help their site withstand a slashdotting.

      --
      What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
    3. Re:cookie etiquette by urmensch · · Score: 1

      You mean like slashdot when you set it auto log you?

    4. Re:cookie etiquette by geekoid · · Score: 1

      make your cookie colder read only should do the trick as well. Most, if not all, system will 'think' it succeeded in writing a cookie.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:cookie etiquette by Resound · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and those enormous cookie files chew up so much drive space too. I mean, they can run to over a thousand bytes!

  23. The Bet Muybridge Settled by handy_vandal · · Score: 4, Informative

    [Muybridge] was asked to settle a bet on whether all four of a galloping horse's feet are ever all off the ground at the same time.

    He did settle the bet.

    Yes, all four of a galloping horse's feet are off the ground at the same time -- at the moment when all four hooves are underneath the horse, in their most-inward position.

    For more info, see my page of Muybridge trivia and links.

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:The Bet Muybridge Settled by jcdill · · Score: 1

      I don't think there was a dispute that all 4 hoofs are off the ground at one time in the canter/gallop. This is something that can be readily seen by the unaided eye when you watch horses gallop. This moment of suspension was well known by horsemen of the time and was written about in training books of that era. The problem would have been one of determining if all 4 hoofs were off the ground at one time at the trot. See: http://cvm.msu.edu/dressage/articles/mcrep/mcrep12 .htm

      --
      "I'd much rather be mistaken as a lesbian by a bigot than be mistaken as a bigot by a lesbian."
  24. If Bullet Time Had Never Been Invented by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    So like bullet time then? So the Matrix is sort of Muybridge Reloaded?

    Exactly.

    Now all we need is a time machine that can go back to Muybridge's era, so we can kill Keanu Reeves' great-grandfather.

    No, wait -- wrong time-slip, I'm thinking of the Terminator -- okay, we go back in time and kill Schwartzenegger's grandfather.

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
  25. BitTorrent ? ? by Swanktastic · · Score: 2, Informative

    It would be nice if someone would put up a BitTorrent link... These guys may not have the bandwidth to distribute this thing...

  26. Actually there were 200 plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There were lost plates at the beginning that suggested we might head for the barn to consume some Feltmen's Intestine-Wrapped Weiner Meats.

  27. I've set up a Torrent by gspr · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here.

    1. Re:I've set up a Torrent by spinflip · · Score: 1

      Thank you ;)

      Will seed for a while too

    2. Re:I've set up a Torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you need to get rid of the ending .mov (it's .mov.torrent.mov)

      quicktime tries to open it.

  28. Reanimating the 1882 Transit of Venus by richie2000 · · Score: 1
    Reanimating the 1882 Transit of Venus

    Reanimating the 2004 Slashdotting of www.scyandtelescone.com

    How about letting their poor sysadmin reanimate the webserver? Kiss of life!

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
  29. /. ed soo.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    here it is..
    (scroll & blink rapidly..)

    ( ) sun/venus
    (. ) sun/venus
    ( . ) sun/venus
    ( . ) sun/venus
    ( . ) sun/venus
    ( . ) sun/venus
    ( .) sun/venus
    ( ) sun/venus

  30. yep, slashdotted by zedge · · Score: 1

    Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server error '80004005'
    Timeout expired
    /banmanpro/banmanfunc.asp, line 1467

  31. Color photos before color film by jonhuang · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Reminds me of this guy: Russian color photos before color film

    1. Re:Color photos before color film by Dallascaper · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link. It's interesting how the past can seem so distant when viewed through black & white, but so near and real when viewed through color. Some of the images on that site were taken before WW1, but look like they were taken yesterday. This reminds me of a photographer (I don't remember his name) who traveled the US in the early twentieth century capturing images using a primitive form of color photography. I believe he intended to use the images for postcards, but the venture failed and his photos languished undiscovered for decades. Someone made a book from the photos and it completely changed my perception of the past.

    2. Re:Color photos before color film by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if i remember this rightly the idea of using filters for color seperation was attempted fairly early on, though it may have been pure chance that the emulsions of the time were sensitive to a broad range of colors. the problem was in successfully mounting your slides for direct viewing or projection, and maintaining near perfect registration. balanced illumination before the maturity of the electric light was another problem.

  32. Movie mirror by markclong · · Score: 5, Informative
  33. Lick Observatory and Mount Hamilton by bug506 · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you ever visit the Lick Observatory, they have pictures that show how the tiny town of San Jose that existed when the Observatory was built has grown so large. Of course, this causes problems with light pollution. Part of their solution was an agreement with the city in 1980 to use low-pressure sodium lights that the observatory can more easily filter out.

    http://mthamilton.ucolick.org/public/lighting/Coop eration2.html

    Everyone who visits me notices that the lights in San Jose are "different" and "weird;" it took visiting the Observatory to find out why.

    By the way, if you want to visit the Lick and look through the telescopes, they have summer tours that I recommend. Not only do you get to look through the telescopes and learn a lot about astronomy and the history of the Observatory, there are amazing (and even romantic) night-time views of the Bay Area. (They normally discourage night-time visits because the car headlights interfere with the telescopes.) There's a lottery for it because it is so popular:

    http://www.ucolick.org/public/sumvispro.html

    Joey

  34. The power of slashdot! by Johnny+Fusion · · Score: 1

    Wow. That is simply amazing.

    The Slashdot effect has become so powerful, it can not travel back in time and knock things off the net before they are invented!

    --
    There are two kinds of fool. One says, This is old, and therefore good. And one says, This is new, and therefore better.
    1. Re:The power of slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ack the preview button is there for a reason. The word 'not' should read 'now'.

  35. More information on transits of Venus by StupendousMan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Transits of Venus -- in which the planet crosses the face of the Sun as seen from Earth -- are rare events. They occur in pairs, eight years apart, with gaps of roughly 120 years between pairs. The last pair was 1874 and 1882, so this movie shows the most recent transit.

    However, the next transit is in just a few months, on June 8, 2004. It will be visible from Europe, but only the tail end can be seen from North America. If you miss this one, the next is in June of 2012.

    Transits were very important to astronomers in the past because they offered an opportunity to measure the distance between the Earth and the Sun; that, in turn, yielded the distance between Earth and every planet in the solar system. I've written a document explaining how transits of Venus could be used to determine the size of the solar system. It includes a little history, too. Look at

    http://spiff.rit.edu/classes/phys235/venus_t/venus _t.html

    --
    Michael Richmond "This is the heart that broke my finger."
    mwrsps@rit.edu http://stupendous.rit.edu
  36. Disney by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can you find one of Mickey Mouse before he was invented? I really want to piss off Disney for extending the copyright to keep their damn rodent.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    1. Re:Disney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you find one of Mickey Mouse before he was invented? I really want to piss off Disney for extending the copyright to keep their damn rodent.

      Here it is

  37. What the hell has Edison got to do with it? by nagora · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This is the second time this week I've seen someone compare an early film to when Edison was working. Apart from being famous for abusing the patent system what has Edison got to do with early movies?!

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    1. Re:What the hell has Edison got to do with it? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Apart from being famous for abusing the patent system what has Edison got to do with early movies?!

      According to a Disney World exhibit and a Simpsons episode, he invented it.
      Probably due to abusing the patent system to get the patent for movies while others actually did the inventing.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:What the hell has Edison got to do with it? by nagora · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the answer. Following it up I can see that he had a slightly dubious claim on it, but apparently asking about it is "Flamebait"!?

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  38. Re:i refuse to install quicktime. its malware by Game+Genie · · Score: 3, Funny

    And wmp isn't??
    -

  39. [OT] Re:Lick Observatory and Mount Hamilton by yulek · · Score: 1

    and the drive/ride up to the top of the mountain is absolutely gorgeous.

    --
    in this age of communication i'm just not getting through
  40. Copyright? by KjetilK · · Score: 1
    Thanks!

    © 2003 University of California Observatories / Lick Observatory.

    I was just wondering...: Can they copyright this stuff (that is, the movie), so long after the actual photos were taken...?

    --
    Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    1. Re:Copyright? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Can they copyright this stuff (that is, the movie), so long after the actual photos were taken...?

      I think that they can copyright that exact movie they made, but since the original plates are (I'm assuming) Public Domain, you could make your own movie from the originals.

  41. Galileo's Sunspot Drawings Animated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This has been done with Galileo's sunspot drawings

    http://es.rice.edu/ES/humsoc/Galileo/Things/g_su ns pots.html

    That source material predates this by centuries

  42. More likely by localman · · Score: 1

    and if she refused he just cracked her over the head

    Before there were all the social taboos brought about by organized religion, women were often happy to have sex. Check out the history of the Tahitians, for example. Biologically speaking, boys and girls like to get naked together and fool around. It's only church opression that makes us think of it as something men need to beg for and women should avoid (or be labled a whore).

    Cheers.

    1. Re:More likely by osgeek · · Score: 1

      Not that I completely object to the idea of wanton sex... mmmm.... what? Oh yeah. Anyway, microbes are very easily transferred as a result of sex, so the church's stance -- like those of not eating pork, things that were "unclean", etc. -- actually had societal benefits.

      In modern times, you need look no further than the rampant AIDS epedimic in Africa to see where promiscuity can lead a society.

    2. Re:More likely by localman · · Score: 1

      Fair enough -- though I don't think that was even understood in the old days, so the church wasn't doing it for our health.

      On the flip side, I think that a more open attitude towards sex (and sexual discussion) would benefit our society as far as disease and unwanted pregnancy is concerned. Fact is we _are_ promiscuous (an estimated 80% infidelity rate in marriage, for example) but we just lie about it.

      Personally, I would say that the problem in Africa is poverty and lack of education, not promiscuity.

      Cheers.

    3. Re:More likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm already wandering too far afield, but the last time I checked, people who don't have money don't wake up infected by HIV, nor do people who can't read. People who swap body fluids with HIV-positive people often _do_, though.

      Cultures that historically repress sexuality aren't being ravaged by the mother of all STDs the way cultures that don't are. This is not a question of laying blame or judging, but of impartially assessing. Part of the cause of the rapid spread of the disease has been our unwillingness to say this, lest we hurt feelings or "offend".

    4. Re:More likely by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Personally, I would say that the problem in Africa is poverty and lack of education, not promiscuity.

      Before you can solve a problem you have to know where the problem is. "Lack of $$$ & lack of knowledge" != "gotta fuck like goddamned rabbits."

      The problem is that they are constantly screwing multiple people, and that is the ONLY problem. The only reason to blame it on something else is because you are uncomfortable discussing the real cause.

      If they weren't promiscuous, AIDS would not be spreading an fast as it is -- plain and simple, that is the ONLY reason. Now, you can argue WHY they are promiscuous, but I am sure it is not because they don't know that 12^2=144... And I don't even think you can blame it on lack of sexual education. These people, for the most part, know damn well there's an epidemic going on that half of their fellow country(wo)men are suffering from, and is spread only by having sex. They do it anyway. Why? Who knows, they must not care.

    5. Re:More likely by localman · · Score: 1

      people who don't have money don't wake up infected by HIV, nor do people who can't read. People who swap body fluids with HIV-positive people often _do_,

      Actually, everyone on the planet swaps body fluids whether they like to admit it or not. And the poorer and less educated nations are the ones with the highest rate of HIV.

      The STD rate in America has dropped over the last 20 years, and the data indicates that it is from increased condom use (enabled by education and money), not from abstinence.

      At least that's what I've read.

      Cheers.

    6. Re:More likely by localman · · Score: 1

      People everyone fuck like rabbits. I know it's hard to believe for us slashdot folks, but it's true ;)

      As I replied to an other post: promiscuity in America has gone up in the past two decades, but HIV transmission has gone down. Look up some numbers on that. You will never stop people from fucking because it is probably the most base human urge after hunger. It's amazing the risks people will take to have sex. But if you educate them and offer them condoms, you can get most of them to use them.

      So I stand by my statement: lack of education and poverty are the root cause of rampant STD's. Calling sex the root cause of STD's is like calling birth the root cause of death. Perhaps it's true, but it's not the most practical way to go about solving the problem.

      Cheers.

    7. Re:More likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      em>Calling sex the root cause of STD's is like calling birth the root cause of death.

      How about:

      Life is a sexually transmitted disease that leads to death.

  43. Galileo's Sunspots - Even Earlier by bangzilla · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I attended an Edward Tufte lecture last year where he had assembled static pictures from drawings made by Galileo of the motion of Sun spots into a movie -- Galileo was the "cameraman", Tufte the "editor". Nice teamwork.

    Lots of links here http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?EdwardTufte

    I also recall someone recreating audio from the thousands of years ago from the grooves cut by a potter in the pot he/she was throwing on a wheel. Essentially the pot and it's grooves acted as a recording device in the same way that the groves in vinyl do (did!).

    --
    Rich people are eccentric. Poor people are strange. Me, I'd be happy with odd.
  44. See also Russian color photographer by Murphy(c) · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the same vein as making movies before actual movies, see also the great photographs of Sergei Mikhailovich Prokudin-Gorskii.

    He took pictures using color filters on 3 different cameras, and then used 3 candlelight projectors to recombine the the image in one color picture.

    Pretty neat stuff, here is the link.

    Bare in mind that all those color pictures are pre-1900, which I personally find absolutely incredible, because to me black-white means old, and suddenly seeing landscapes and people in color, somehow makes them more real.

    Murphy(c)

  45. Lick Observatory is a treasure trove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I used to work up at Lick Observatory when I was in College. They have a real treasure trove up there, so I'm not surprised that someone has stumbled across this stuff.

    The stuff really ought to be cataloged and put on display. Some of it is priceless.

    Aside from James Licks' body being buried under the base of the 36" telescope, back in the archive storage that have a lot of interesting things from history. Like some of the equipment used for the experiment which established that the speed of light was a constant in a vacuum. The actual seismic records from the San Francisco Earthquake. I've forgotten what else; but those things stand out. It's a huge storage area up there.

    Plus they have a copy of UC Berkeley's student records. It's used as a safe place in case of disaster. Also, James Licks' deathbed is there too. And the safe they have is straight from the 1800's.

    In case any two-bit crackers are thinking about breaking in and exploring it, forget about it. Security is excellent up there. I busted a clueless group once myself. And the cops they have are real aggressive hard-asses.

  46. Movie of Lincoln by bluyonder · · Score: 1

    I remember seeing an animation of Abraham Lincoln made from several portraits of him at different angles. I'm thinking that the same thing could be done of any popular subject which has had multiple pictures taken of it.

  47. coverage by deadboy2000 · · Score: 1
    Logline: When a beautiful but emotionally distant planet crosses through the telescopic field of a handsome but socially awkward astronomer, they discover that a meaningful relationship can only come from years of hard work aligning graph paper.

    Brief: Although the world that the author has created is rich and compelling, the story arc falls flat in the third act.

  48. idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ideas don't belong to anyone
    Im sure that someone was flippping pages or looking at sequences of drawings before movies were "invented". The idea of "invention" is really a property of the western history media machine. The fist to get attention is the one who is credited. Its just the natural progression of looking at sequences of numbers to looking at sequences of pictures. Of couse, I might have hindsight bias.

  49. YAQTJ (Yet Another Qucktime Joke) by dupper · · Score: 1

    I wonder how long this took to encode on the Analytical Engine?

  50. Executing Elephants and Edison vs. Tesla by Cordath · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Tesla originally worked for Edison, but they had a bit of a falling out. Eventually they were both competing in the power market, with Tesla selling AC current and Edison selling DC. AC has a lot of advantages for power transmision, but that didn't stop Edison from embarking on a campaign to discredit AC power. He electrocuted dogs and cats with AC current in public demonstrations intended to show how dangerous AC power was.

    During the construction of Luna Park on Coney island, an elephant used as a beast of burden killed a couple of people. Topsy, as she was called, was condemned to death. However, there was a wee bit of a problem. Elephants aren't the easiest critters to kill. Edison, being the generous person he was, gladly volunteered to execute the elephant with AC current, and filmed the whole thing. He showed that film "Electrocuting an Elephant" (1903) publically on many occasions and I am sure more than a few stray cats and dogs escaped a crispy fate thanks to that film. It is still possible to track down copies of "Electrocuting an Elephant" today. Please be warned that it's a rather gruesome little piece of history, and is not for the faint of heart, or SPCA members.

    1. Re:Executing Elephants and Edison vs. Tesla by Suidae · · Score: 1

      The recently broadcast Tesla program (on PBS I think) played the elephant electrocution clip.

  51. Zoetrope by rufusdufus · · Score: 1

    The Zoetrope predates this example of moving pictures by quite a bit. It is an animation device invented in 1834 by William George Horner. Maybe you've seen one before: a cylinder with pictures inside and slits that you look through as you spin it.

  52. Let Me Guess...You're A Brit, Right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only a Brit would be sure to point out the Brit heritage of the guy. Kind of like how Australians say things like "Australia's very own Russell Crowe!", etc, like it matters...oh well, whatever makes them feel better about their history.

    1. Re:Let Me Guess...You're A Brit, Right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope, not a brit at all, but it would not have been totally accurate to say that he was an American or that he was a Brit, so I went for broke.

      -P

  53. And webmaster doesn't care by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    I complained to the webmaster last time there was a Sky and Telescope link and got a snotty reply. Obviously no one there really cares much abotu understanding the technology.

  54. Muybridge's nude women... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...not exactly porn, these undraped ladies are gracefully bending over to lift urns and things like that, but nevertheless I personally would be more interested in reanimations of those lovely Venuses than in reanimations of the planet Venus.

    1. Re:Muybridge's nude women... by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

      ...can be seen, re-animated, at this site.

  55. Bah! by nystagman · · Score: 1

    The book was better.

    --
    Theory and practice are the same in theory, but different in practice.
  56. Picture of Mickey Mouse before he was invented by Alien54 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Can you find one of Mickey Mouse before he was invented? I really want to piss off Disney for extending the copyright to keep their damn rodent.

    An Anonymous coward posted this link, but since it did not make it above the noise, here is the link to the news story:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/2481749.s tm

    Friday, 15 November, 2002 - A 700-year-old fresco bearing an uncanny resemblance to Walt Disney's Mickey Mouse has been discovered in Austria. The mouse figure was unearthed by an art historian working on the church in the southern village of Malta. Click here to see the image of the fresco in full The figure bears an enormous resemblance to Walt Disney's famous mouse to this 14th Century figure. Art historians are claiming the discovery could mean the end of Disney's copyright on the character.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  57. "Quick" time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, 120 years sounds about right for the time for that program to load and start playing.

    Buffering... (3,786,433,633 seconds to go)

  58. Don't they? by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1
    Compare:

    ancient artifact
    modern smut

    Coincidence?

    1. Re:Don't they? by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

      Crap. Try this link. Image 15.

  59. My dad's a award winning cinematographer by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    Who helped teach 2 award academy award winning DOPs, & he reckons the French were the 1st to develop practical movie picture technology.

  60. magic lanterns, flip books centuries old by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Cellular animation has been a round for centuries. People painted little animations on lamp shades and spun them. You can buy such in novelty stores today.

    A popular 19th century lecture circuit entertainment was the scroll-movie narration. A scrolling of up to a mile long was unwound behind a narrator. Frequently these were travelogues of exotic places like the western US.

  61. Mod Parent +1 Informative by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    I don't think there was a dispute that all 4 hoofs are off the ground at one time in the canter/gallop .... The problem would have been one of determining if all 4 hoofs were off the ground at one time at the trot.

    I didn't know that. Thanks for the info.

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj