Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Develop 3-D Search Engine

An anonymous reader writes "Researchers have developed new search engines that can mine catalogs of three-dimensional objects, like airplane parts or architectural features. All the users have to do is sketch what they're thinking of, and the search engines can produce comparable objects."

140 comments

  1. So... by daishin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Now I can fly around the "Search" button?

    --
    (\_/)
    (O.o) This is Bunny. Add Bunny to your signature
    (> <) to help him achieve world domination.
  2. Is this a good thing to be releasing? by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Funny

    How long until we hear about an "architectural piracy" case over the design of small-city houses...

    1. Re:Is this a good thing to be releasing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, in my town, there is currently a lawsuit in which one man claims the other copied the design for his house down to the last floorboard, and that this is somehow copyright infringement.

  3. Depends too much on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the user's ability to sketch. I used to teach an amature art class, most people can't even draw a recognizable hand.

    1. Re:Depends too much on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn amatures kant spel eether.

    2. Re:Depends too much on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And even if they can sketch, they're only going to draw "what they're thinking of".

      ie. pr0n, all the time ("amature" indeed!).

    3. Re:Depends too much on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      the user's ability to sketch. I used to teach an amature art class, most people can't even draw a recognizable hand.

      What a coincidence. I used to teach a Spelling for Amateurs class, and most people couldn't even spell the name of the class.

    4. Re:Depends too much on by Mateito · · Score: 1
      I used to teach an amature art class, most people can't even draw a recognizable hand.

      "Armature: A protective covering, structure, or organ of an animal or a plant, such as teeth, claws, thorns, or the shell of a turtle.

      However, when they graduated, they could draw claws like a pro.

    5. Re:Depends too much on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there such a thing as a professional speller? I didn't think it was a career option...

    6. Re:Depends too much on by Patris_Magnus · · Score: 1

      I'm sure I can type the word corinthian faster than I can draw a corinthian column

    7. Re:Depends too much on by Black_Logic · · Score: 2

      I thought the same thing. But what about someone who's building/creating something new, especially someone without knowledge of lots of existings part types in database x, each time they do drawing for each little part in their design, run it through the search engine to see if it's something that's already been fabricated. Probably not the intended use though.

      --
      Ansi's and stupid tricks!
    8. Re:Depends too much on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sketching the human body is considered one the hardest things to draw. If you really teach art, you'd know that. I know many people who teach art (some even teach drawing) and it's a well known fact. Perspective drawing is many times easier. Most people learn to draw circles and squares at a very young age. Of course this search engine is for people who can do drafting, so I don't think the user's abilities will be much of a problem.

      --
      One AC deserves another.

    9. Re:Depends too much on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I learned how to spell amateur from USENET:
      alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.amateur.

    10. Re:Depends too much on by ScottGant · · Score: 1

      So you used to teach an art class where the people couldn't draw...hmmmm...

      1. It was a CLASS you TEACH...therefore you are there to TEACH them to draw.

      or

      2. After the class that you taught they still couldn't draw...who's fault is that really? There's or yours?

      Also, how is this modded as interesting?

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    11. Re:Depends too much on by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Editor.

      Don't assume all writers spell flawlessly. They have editors and proofreaders who are supposed to pick out all the mistaeks. Luckily, I can spell flawlessly ;-)

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    12. Re:Depends too much on by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      the user's ability to sketch.

      Do designers/engineers/draftsmen actually learn to draw these days, or is it all CAD-based?

    13. Re:Depends too much on by PurdueGraphicsMan · · Score: 1

      At Purdue there's not much drawing, but there is some. The main purpose of it is to show you how much more precise and accurate the computer generated versions are. So, you don't spend much time on it really.

      --


      The guitars sound good, now give me about 10db more on the cow bell.
    14. Re:Depends too much on by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Isn't Purdue where George Goble teaches? I wonder why his LOX BBQ lighting page was taken down.

      Anyway, back on topic, there's no question that CAD is more precise but during early design stages, precision is not the goal and too much focus on computer-generated perfection hinders the process. People tend to get wrapped-up in the workings of the software and can produce brilliant-looking, but comepletely stupid drawings and unworkable designs.

      My opinion is that CAD people should learn how to draw by hand before they even get to touch drafting software. This would weed out the wannabes and ensure that people learning the field are not completely useless when working onsite or when having to graphically communicate ideas quickly without the use of a machine.

      Bad analogies: do grade school kids get to use calculators for addition/subtraction exercises? Do phones without numeric keypads (0-9) sound like a good idea (I.E., all phone numbers pre-programmed or voice-activated)?

    15. Re:Depends too much on by PurdueGraphicsMan · · Score: 1
      Isn't Purdue where George Goble teaches? I wonder why his LOX BBQ lighting page was taken down.

      Yes, it is. Also, you can find a site containing photos as well as audio clips from his infamous technique for lighting a charcoal grill here.

      --


      The guitars sound good, now give me about 10db more on the cow bell.
    16. Re:Depends too much on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being able to draw a accurate portrait of a girl will get you laid more often than being able to spell her name, virgin.

    17. Re:Depends too much on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wrote "amature" not "armature". I misspelled a word, but god you're stupid.

    18. Re:Depends too much on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I said "recognizable hand". Not even "anatomically correct hand." I mean four primary fingers and a thumb. Many people cannot do this. They end up with five sticks branching the same direction from a circle.

  4. Dupe by Zagar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Didn't we have a similar article about 3D searching a week ago?

    --
    YAFIRL (Yet another Free iPods referral link)
    1. Re:Dupe by Esekla · · Score: 1

      Slashdot editors are beginning to remind me of Patent Officers. Prior Art(icle) anyone?

    2. Re:Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except in this case, it's about the SAME RESEARCH (i.e., the research being done at Purdue).

    3. Re:Dupe by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1

      *easy one* If only those scientists developed a dupe-searcher... in 2d or 3d : I dont care ;)

    4. Re:Dupe by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      What's the point in having a 3d search engine when people won't use the search engines we already have?

    5. Re:Dupe by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Didn't we have a similar article about 3D searching a week ago?"

      I drew "/. x II" and got lotsa hits!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:Dupe by elcausado · · Score: 1

      Yup!
      Its not similar, its the same! This time a different news agency (CNN) is reporting it. So much for ``Breaking News" ;-)

      --
      ------
      I believe in freedom of thought. I have no other choice.
  5. again ? by rxvt · · Score: 1

    i've seen it before on slashdot i guess

    1. Re:again ? by Xeo+024 · · Score: 2, Informative
      i've seen it before on slashdot i guess

      Well it's not exactly the same thing, the article posted before was about Purdue's shape searching engine while this article is about Princeton's 3D model search. Same topic, different search engines.

  6. Finally... by Unnngh! · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...I can have the computer search for my keys for me.

    Oh, wait

  7. Joke? by cflorio · · Score: 1, Funny

    I didn't get the memo about the April Fools jokes going on ALL APRIL?

    1. Re:Joke? by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      "April Fools' jokes" only applies to jokes.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:Joke? by mrwonton · · Score: 1

      Yeah, April 16th is April Dupe's Day.

      --
      Not more than you need, just more than you want
  8. Yay by f0d0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    A 3D haystack!

  9. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In related news... the Etch-a-Sketch people's patent lawyers are revving their engines :-)

  10. Maybe something for ./? by __aagctu1952 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If Slashdot started comparing the general shape of submitted articles maybe we would avoid a couple of dupes...

    1. Re:Maybe something for ./? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if morons learned to read they might avoid:
      A) Being the 3rd person to yell 'Dupe!!!'
      B) Not noticing the fact that the article is not, in fact, a dupe.

  11. How long before by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    How long before the porn industry capitalizes on this one?

    The possibilities are endless.

    1. Re:How long before by bigberk · · Score: 1
      How long before the porn industry capitalizes on this one?
      Are you kidding me? I'm thinking of something I'd like right now that even med students would have trouble sketching
    2. Re:How long before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      computer, please search for:

      8===D

    3. Re:How long before by danharan · · Score: 1

      You are 100% correct.

      If I were in that market, I'd LOVE it if people could sketch what they wanted to see. There are probably a lot of extremely lucrative niches out there waiting to be tapped! :)

      --
      Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
    4. Re:How long before by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      Easy solution...take a picture of you and your girlfriend doing it and then....Oh...right.... :o)

    5. Re:How long before by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 1
      I'm less certain about the benefits in the porn industry.

      With my sketching abilities I'd probably have a wealth of pictures in the genre of:

      • various forms of penile-nasal insertion
      • lesbian ear lobe on ear lobe action
      • sexual situations with diamondbacks replacing the penis
      And don't forget the shock photos held on that infamous caprine-named site that would be returned just by being a bit too loose with one's sketch.
  12. pr0n by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And they developed this for searching for "industrial objects". Riiighht.

    Seriously though the pr0n industry is an extreme early adopter of most technologies, I'm sure that the researchers could fund research for the rest o their lives by creating an adult search engine.

    John.

    1. Re:pr0n by theM_xl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Are you capable of drawing any female pornstar so that she looks different enough from the others that the search engine can find her? More important, would you actually CARE if it came up wrong? :D

    2. Re:pr0n by Chiasmus_ · · Score: 1

      And if 3D search engines work like real search engines, you'll end up drawing a picture of a Ford Explorer, and the top six sites will all be redirects to www.longurlincludingwordslikehotandpussy.com.

      --
      "Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he deems himself your master."
    3. Re:pr0n by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 0, Troll

      > Are you capable of drawing any female pornstar
      > so that she looks different enough from the others
      > that the search engine can find her?

      Damn, you've uncovered by secret super-power. Oh, you didn't think there was an X-man with the amazing porn star drawing mutation? How wrong you were...

      John.

    4. Re:pr0n by wwest4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > And they developed this for searching for
      > "industrial objects". Riiighht.

      I'll take the sinister uses with the good on this one. This is really exciting for engineers and tinkerers alike, because it means less time reinventing the proverbial wheel.

      Let's say I need gizmoX but it's not manufactured anymore. Fuck! No knock-offs, either. The local CNC shop says they can make it for me but they need a model. 3D modeling could take a while unless you have something similar to start with.

      So instead of PORING over an industrial parts catalog and missing the one close-enough part you needed but didn't expect to find under "444_T91_fillets" or whatever, you just search for matches using dimensions, materials, etc. Just a few minor tweaks to the mesh, export, send to the shop, and you just saved a lot of time.

      That said - the design and manufacturing industries have been writing ad hoc programs for searching for parts and tooling since the proliferation of computers, but it's nice to see that a general-purpose algorithm that could be more or less universally applicable is evolving from the efforts thus far.

    5. Re:pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would be cool is the ability to load a pic of your fav pr0n star and have it find more pics of said pr0n star.

    6. Re:pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about loading it a pic of anyone and it generating a nude photo from the face. This would be fun masturbation material, whacking off to my stalking victims!

    7. Re:pr0n by cgenman · · Score: 1

      "Hey Ben, I need that little thingie. You know, the one with the two parts and the stuff around it?"

      I don't think you need to go so far as editing to find a good use for this.

  13. Ooo its you draw what you want... by daishin · · Score: 0

    So now I get to draw the porn I want, wank to that, and then get to see the porn I want! OMG! Wait doesnt Google already have this feature? They have everything else /:

    --
    (\_/)
    (O.o) This is Bunny. Add Bunny to your signature
    (> <) to help him achieve world domination.
    1. Re:Ooo its you draw what you want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you could draw the porn you wanted, you wouldn't actually need Google or anything else. You'd just draw the porn you wanted, no?

      Just like people did in the Middle Ages and Renaissance...

  14. accuracy.. by zeruch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...will be the most critical part. i could easily see people doodling in the dark trying to get an object they desire, but are not sure how to visually detail out.

    1. Re:accuracy.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      How exactly *does* one draw 36-24-36 anyways?

    2. Re:accuracy.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of like this.

      Q
      O O
      |
      /V\
      | |
      < >

  15. Hrrm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The editors already seem to be unable to "mine a catalog" of text.

  16. i dunno about you, by trmj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    but I rarely see stuff come out of MS Paint that resembles what it's supposed to be.

    Of course, this could be used to search from a scanned in image, which would be good for things like finding car parts, which we had a story about a couple of days ago. Old news, slightly different subject.

    --
    Work sucked, until it became unemployment, when it became slightly more tolerable. -Tet
    1. Re:i dunno about you, by Dok+Fenderson · · Score: 1

      Frolixio always seems to do a good job!

      Dok

      --
      "You can't screw the system, but you can give it a good fondling." -- Too lazy to look it up
  17. Previous /. article by jwbing · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Previous /. article by Nahor · · Score: 2, Funny
  18. Prior Art by weeboo0104 · · Score: 1

    I believe it's called "Where's Waldo?"

    --
    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
  19. obligatory pr0n usage by plams · · Score: 1

    So all I have to do is sketch a woman with big boobies?..

    1. Re:obligatory pr0n usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm more of a JLo posterior fan myself.

  20. is it really easier to use? by zome · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it's alot easier to type "fireplace" than draw it.

    1. Re:is it really easier to use? by Carnildo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it's alot easier to type "fireplace" than draw it.

      It's easier to sketch the part than to remember that the guy who created the drawing called it a "3/8ths Gripley"

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  21. Shit... by AstrumPreliator · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My drawing skills are something to be desired. I'm not exactly sure how they can compensate for poor artists...

    1. Re:Shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anyone even read the article? It looks like this "3D search engine" will be used by people who CAN draw (ie. people who are designing the parts and whatnot). Obviously if you can't draw for craps, then you'll just stick to the text based search.

  22. Note to Slashdot editors: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Note to Slashdot editors: Smoking weed causes short term memory issues.

  23. Killer App by women · · Score: 2, Funny

    I believe that the killer app for this technology will be for 3d desktops. Unfortunately, the killer app for 3d desktops probably doesn't exist.

    --
    If you're a fan of women, add me to your friends list.
    1. Re:Killer App by corngrower · · Score: 1

      I've already got a 3-D desktop. The killer app is the monitor & keyboard that sets on top of it.

  24. Do I need to wear my 3D blue-red glasses? by xv4n · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Haven't been used for a wile since like Jaws 3D.

  25. Even 3D developers will be confussed by Wellmont · · Score: 2, Informative

    Personally i've been freelance developing 3D art and models for companies for a few years now, and i've learned a couple of things.
    Turbo squid is better for artists.
    And 3D objects don't get better with age (at least not yet)

    This will be GREAT for the production industry (which has moved off shore) as users will be able to forget their skills of automatic recall when it comes to part recognition and sucumb to the all mighty 3D shape database.

  26. Porn by iswm · · Score: 0

    What a great new way to search for porn!

    --
    Buckethead
  27. Any neural net people here? by Thinkit4 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been curious if there has been a hyperelegant neural network solution that can do everything from recognize handwriting to faces. Completely different applications would only require retraining. So you wouldn't hear about specific applications like this, but one breakthrough that can simply, elegantly be applied anytime recognition must be performed. Are there any real (not patent or such) related reasons this doesn't exist?

    --
    -I am an elective eunuch.
    1. Re:Any neural net people here? by nacturation · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've been curious if there has been a hyperelegant neural network solution that can do everything from recognize handwriting to faces. [...] Are there any real (not patent or such) related reasons this doesn't exist?

      Aside from the fact that about a third of the brain (if I remember correctly) is dedicated to visual processing and that the brain has a hundred billion neurons, each neuron firing at up to 1KHz and with thousands of connections to other neurons? :)

      It's an enourmously complex task to be able to do this reliably. Recognizing a straight-on photograph and matching it up with a corresponding mugshot is a whole lot different than seeing the side of a person's half-shadowed face from slightly behind them and recognizing that as the same Alice who held up the convenience store on Tuesday.

      Handwriting recognition is orders of magnitude easier to do, since it's a lot easier to recognize similarities between a sample of writing and previously analyzed samples. In fact, there's a lot of research into this already. Facial recognition is slowly getting there, but people are still stumbling over the same mistakes that were made decades ago -- attempting to formalize facial recognition by defining a set of rules and matching to those rules. Much like spam filtering, this works to a degree until the differences between the one you want and the one you don't no longer fits within the rules.

      Neural net + genetic algorithms/programming to refine the net's connections and behavior is probably a good approach. Finding a means of populating, storing, and computing hundreds of billions of nodes in the network is the real challenge I think. Of course, take everything I've said with a huge grain of salt as this is a subject I'm fascinated by but have little practical experience with.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  28. I'm not too good at sketching, by darkonc · · Score: 3, Funny

    but I can give you her measurements....

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    1. Re:I'm not too good at sketching, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the article, this comment is a dupe!

      What next? In Soviet Russia, you dupe Slashdot jokes? :)

    2. Re:I'm not too good at sketching, by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1

      Funniest. Soviet Russia joke. Ever.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
  29. Picasso? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    My drawing skills are something to be desired.

    Your english skills leave something to be desired.

  30. Sorry to drag Bush in to this... by Neko-kun · · Score: 1, Funny

    And if somebody *ahem*Bush*ahem* drew a WMD, it'd still give him this

  31. New slogan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like Slashdot needs a new slogan: Dupes for Nerds, Stuff that Mattered.

    Seriously though... is it me, or are a lot of people submitting previous stories in order to expose the "editors" for what most of them are: a bunch of overpaid geeks who have no clue what editing is really all about.

  32. dumbass by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 0
    "I think this," he said, "is the beginning of the information age."

    this from the chief scientist. what an idiot.

  33. Clippy for the drawing impared by Craptastic+Weasel · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ahhh I can see it now. The marketing types will have a field day with this one. Maybe they could incorporate Clippy into the program, to help out the drawing impared.

    "I see you are trying to draw a monkey wearing what looks like a condom on it's head... May I assist you in finding such an item?"

    "Click'

    "Find books about Monkeys With Condoms on their Heads at Amazon.com"

    "Find the lowest priced Monkey with Condoms on their heads with Price Grabber"

    Bring it.

    1. Re:Clippy for the drawing impared by Jardine · · Score: 2, Funny

      Being a curious little monkey and not having the man with the yellow hat around to stop me, I searched amazon.com for this.

      The first book that comes up: "The Trouble with Islam : A Muslim's Call for Reform in Her Faith". I have no idea what this means, but it has to be significant in some way.

  34. Very Funny, Almost Ridiculous by osewa77 · · Score: 1

    Where's the sata they will use to build their index? WHo has the experties to actually construct a search query?

  35. Beta Results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The researchers have released the most popular sketch submitted by beta testers who were asked to sketch what they're thinking of:

    +---------+
    | |
    | (.Y.) |
    | ) ( |
    | ( Y ) |
    | |
    +---------+

    1. Re:Beta Results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try searching for (.Y.) or ( Y ) on google.

    2. Re:Beta Results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the second result is for a breast cancer link. I guess it worked?

    3. Re:Beta Results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:Beta Results by BinLadenMyHero · · Score: 1

      That's because it has 'Y-ME' on the title and on the domain name http://www.y-me.org/

  36. damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Safari can't open the page "http://www.longurlincludingwordslikehotandpussy.c om/" because it can't find the server "www.longurlincludingwordslikehotandpussy.com&#148 ;.

    Had to check.

    1. Re:damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really?? They must have let it lapse... now's your big chance!

  37. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Help, I've got a 3-D search engine up my ass!

  38. Absolutely wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what would the instructions say about how to draw "lesbian" for example? Searching for porn is a monumentally stupid application of this technology. 95% of the people out there would only get results which include penis or breast, and anything drawn more complex than that would all return a link to the goatse guy. In the five seconds it takes to type in the exact kind of pr0n you're looking for (eg: at sex.com or some other search engine) you wouldn't even be able to draw a stick figure representation of the same thing, which is indistinguishable from just about every other crude drawing. Not to mention that you'd need some kind of applet/ActiveX/whatever to allow the user to do the crude drawing via mouse.

    If you don't believe me, then please try this exercise. Grab a pen, a piece of paper, and a stopwatch. Now, start the timer and begin drawing mature granny lesbian bondage with piercings and anal penetration. Go. How long did that take?

    1. Re:Absolutely wrong by AllenChristopher · · Score: 1
      "Grab a pen, a piece of paper, and a stopwatch. Now, start the timer and begin drawing mature granny lesbian bondage with piercings and anal penetration. Go. How long did that take?"

      Just under two minutes... but then, I play a lot of iSketch. The main bottleneck was coming back to make sure I hadn't missed any terms from your description.

      Two minutes is a long time, but if the search engine could work off my picture then I would get the pose in it, instead of just ANY picture of lesbian grannies tied up and penetrated. It's a trade-off. The time I saved with a good sketching engine would come in not having to look at so many pictures to find the right one. With the description you gave, I'd like to look at as few as possible.

      Personally, I doubt it would pick up on the granny bit, because it would have to ignore wrinkles in case the artist is just shaky. The Gary Larson granny glasses were a nice touch, though.

      Of course the real search engine in the article is for 3-D mechanical parts, not 2-D pictures of human parts.

      Now the question is... do you want the picture? *wink*

    2. Re:Absolutely wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, dear god please post a link to the image! I've got a big shit eating grin in anticipation of this... the Gary Larson granny glasses is what I want to see.

    3. Re:Absolutely wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you think I'm going to expose my server to the slashdot effect for the sake of granny bondage porn, you've got another think coming, you slavering perverts.

      I'll give you a hint, though... for the anal penetration, think "bingo dauber."

    4. Re:Absolutely wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A slashdotting in an AC thread half a day later? I don't think you'd be so lucky! At least put it up on geocities or something.

  39. 3D Search Engine Screenshots by CHaN_316 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Larger screenshots of the 3D search engine can be found here and here.

    --
    "There is no spoon." - The Matrix
  40. Old News.. by dustinbarbour · · Score: 1

    I thought we had already covered this. Must be a slow news day..

  41. Obvious use... by Mateito · · Score: 1

    I was wondering if the inventors had thought about this application of this technology to porn.

    The I saw the term "architectural features" and relized that they already had.

  42. Sketching... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the users have to do is sketch what they're thinking of

    How does one go about sketching "Better Job" ?

    I can see the techs now - wiping marker-pen of the monitor...

  43. dupe? by canavan · · Score: 1

    i think this was posted as "search by shape" ages ago

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/04/04/1423 21 0

  44. Glad this got posted by crushinghellhammer · · Score: 1

    When I tried submitting this story two days ago, linking it to a report on an Indian portal, the story was rejected.

    Still, I'm glad this submission was accepted. The next thing we need is a robust audio search engine.

  45. Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting.

    By the way, Lou Dobbs is a faget.

  46. Easy by freeweed · · Score: 1

    I can even do it with a textbox interface:

    Looking for female porn? Enter (*)(*).

    Male your flavour? Try 8=====) (or 8==========) if you're looking for a more "exciting" experience).

    Pattern match, and boom! Instant porn results.

    And no, I cannot believe that I actually posted some ascii pr0n on Slashdot :) Just imagine what the poor search engine would have to do to match that horrible goatse ascii *shudder*. Maybe it'd return some astronomy websites dealing with singularities.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    1. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Looking for female porn? Enter (*)(*).

      No luck at google.

  47. try it. by invein · · Score: 2, Informative
  48. Intangibles by hode · · Score: 1

    What if I want to search for wind or existentialism?

  49. Where was this when I was in 8th grade... by bennomatic · · Score: 1

    ...and spending countless hours at the hardware store trying to find just the right parts to make the coolest bong in the school district?

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
    1. Re:Where was this when I was in 8th grade... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You should have been shopping at Pier One, or as I like to call it: Bong World.


      I made a great vaporizing hooka out of a big glass bowl 'thing' they sold there. Called it 'Godzooka'. Even filled it part way up with those decorative glass marbles they sell. Very pretty, very communal, very effective.

  50. News? by neonstz · · Score: 1

    Is this news? I read about this in an ACM magazine or something like that a year or to ago...

  51. image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid CNN and their useless tiny images. Somebody google us up a link to a real description of this thing, with normal sized screenshots (I'm too lazy).

  52. Great! by JohnnyBigodes · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now all they need to do is a similar engine for pr0n. That way I can draw the perfect tits to look for :D

  53. 4D engine, anyone? by jabbadabbadoo · · Score: 1

    I'll be more impressed when I get my hands on a 4D search engine. My first movie sequence search would be like: "guy fucks women in the * "
    Booble?

  54. I like the idea by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

    Ramani expects his search engine will serve huge industrial companies whose engineers often waste time and energy designing a specialized part when someone else has already created, used or rejected something similar.

    It seems they target the industries only,
    but somewhat earlier I've been thinking too that we need some other way to crawl / search data then we've been doing so far or at least a more advanced way to get specific data. (granted; google does what it does, and does it extremely well)

    Consider a world where you have stuff recording your life and creating lots and lots of data of which you can't manually analyze, categorize, pinpoint a certain piece of data you have in mind , the typical naming of digital pictures; Im000931.jpg - Im001069.jpg.


    B: Pinky, Are You Pondering What I'm Pondering?
    P: Well, I think so, Brain, but "apply North Pole" to what?

    --
    I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
  55. Easier to describe by words by bdigit · · Score: 2, Funny

    Say I want to look for some weird industrial part. I open up google and type "long hard metal round"

    And I come up with plenty of usefu... oh nm

  56. Re:try it. by Dok+Fenderson · · Score: 2, Informative

    I drew what I thought was a fairly respectable stomach (respectable if it had been done by a 10 year old with Down's) and it found a chair, a cabinet, and a "Euro Head". Methinks there was a breakdown in communication somewhere down the line.

    Dok

    --
    "You can't screw the system, but you can give it a good fondling." -- Too lazy to look it up
  57. Come on... by qualico · · Score: 1

    OCR is just starting to recognize letters at a quality that is satisfactory.
    I don't believe this technology exists yet until OCR is perfected.

  58. Dupe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dupe!! Dupe !!! Dupe !!! Dupe !!!

    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!

    Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

  59. a lot of friggin good it does by flyneye · · Score: 0

    a 3d search engine does me no good till i can bring it up in a browser to find the 3d objects I WANT.HEY,THIS IS THE FLY N.EYE DECADE,Al Franken had his decade.What about ME!!!! FLY N. EYE!

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  60. redundant I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I wish the people who selected the stories to be posted actually READ the stories that have been posted so there wouldnt be any dupes

  61. Ok I'm thinking of a number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sketch what they're thinking of, and the search engines can produce comparable objects

    She's around 25, slender, blond, big ole ti...

    ahhhhh never mind....

    1. Re:Ok I'm thinking of a number by prestidigital · · Score: 1

      I have mod points and I'd mod you up Funny, but I want to comment on this article! :^)

  62. We already have that. by DeVilla · · Score: 1

    God designed it. We call them dogs. They can find anything. If the desired object is not ment to be eaten, the an infant does pretty well too.

    This story seems oddly familiar.

  63. "Amature" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect that half the people who live in Rensselaer County (SE of Albany, NY) can't spell the county name. Freely granted that it's a Dutch name, unusual when compared to most English words.

    Enby in Waltham
    who used to live in East Greenbush and Schodack

  64. Duplicated story, you idiots. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Yeah dude, this story is such a dupe. I can't find the damn link, but I assure you, it was posted no longer ago than three weeks.

  65. This is redundant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was posted to the front page before..on April 4th - http://slashdot.org/articles/04/04/04/1423210.shtm l?tid=126

    Seems like this is happening more and more. Does no one read slashdot anymore ?

  66. Cynical Old Man Perspective by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 1

    3d searching used to be tedious, boring, and made your eyeballs itch. Today I can search the google.com for "ddd" and get lightning fast results. We don't need yet another tool to make it even easier.

  67. Long live metamods by empaler · · Score: 1

    I came across the grandparent to this post in metamod and wanted to see the replies - which was (un?)lucky for you, cos you reminded me of a page I once came across:
    Sneezing Gay People