Slashdot Mirror


NextFest

anzha writes "This Saturday and Sunday between 9 and 6 pm at the Fort Mason Center's Festival Pavilion in San Francisco, NextFest will be taking place. Organized by Wired and sponsored by HP, The SF Chronicle, General Electric, General Motors, and many others, this is an expo on 'almost there' technologies. Ranging from [in]famous Moller aircar to a 'transparent cloak' from the Tachi Lab at Tokyo University to antibacterial powders from Canada to many, many others. Read more here."

133 comments

  1. Should be called: The VaporWare Convention by strictnein · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is what's next?
    I guess, if the nextfest.net website is anything to go by, that in the future all websites will be based solely on ultra-annoying Macromedia Flash! A page focused on this type of event should be slim and trim and have a large section devoted to easily viewable/editable/blownupable (to make bigger) pictures of every single device at this convention. Or at least has a large chunk of the site like that.

    1. Re:Should be called: The VaporWare Convention by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Vaporware Convention takes place every year, but it never happens.

    2. Re:Should be called: The VaporWare Convention by happyfrogcow · · Score: 2, Funny

      Something already has that title... it's the E3 gaming convention.

  2. Games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    What about Half-Life2, TF2, Duke Nukem Forever, and SB's HL1 pit map?

  3. Gargh by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 4, Funny

    My first thought on what this was involved Steve Jobs and black boxes!

    1. Re:Gargh by gUmbi · · Score: 1


      My first thought on what this was involved Steve Jobs and black boxes!


      My second thought was that there's going to be a huge market for black turtlenecks that week.

      Jason.

    2. Re:Gargh by ScottGant · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing.

      I still have my NeXTStation Color...not that it's working at the moment, but I just can't part with it.

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    3. Re:Gargh by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      Same here. Now I'm disappointed. But I should have known by the capitalization.

  4. So did I by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    I, too, thought the title referred to some sort of retro-computer celebration.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  5. Contradiction? by Black_Logic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The raincoat-like cloak is made out of "retro-reflective'' material covered with tiny beads that reflect light back in the same direction it came.

    The cloak is designed to make whatever it is covering, a body or object, appear transparent by projecting video shot with a camera from behind the cloak onto the front of the cloak.

    Hold on a sec, these are two very different things. Are they talking about two different cloaks? If so, it's not very obvious from the article. Also, wouldn't the first cloak be a mirror, as opposed to transparent?

    --
    Ansi's and stupid tricks!
    1. Re:Contradiction? by Black_Logic · · Score: 1

      Oh, also, Isn't retro-reflective redundant? Doesn't reflection pretty much imply sending light back in the direction it came?

      (Sorry for responding to my own post. :) )

      --
      Ansi's and stupid tricks!
    2. Re:Contradiction? by Carnildo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oh, also, Isn't retro-reflective redundant? Doesn't reflection pretty much imply sending light back in the direction it came?

      No. Classic reflection (the sort normal mirrors do) involves light heading off in a direction other than the one it was originally going in -- "angle of incidence equals angle of reflection". Retroreflection involves things like corner mirrors and sends light back in a direction exactly opposite the one it was originally headed in.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    3. Re:Contradiction? by nine-times · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm guessing it means that it ultimately reflects light in a way that ultimately sends it along in the direction it was going anyway- so that, although technically it's reflecting, effectively it's transparent.

    4. Re:Contradiction? by kidgenius · · Score: 1

      Nope, it's the same cloak. The way this cloak works is that an image is projected onto it. This projected light will bounce back from where it came. The image that is projected is off the background. It's not really transparent, just a fake of it....kinda like transparency in the current Xserver. You are just taking a picture of what should be behind the object and putting that picture onto the object.

    5. Re:Contradiction? by moviepig.com · · Score: 1
      Isn't retro-reflective redundant? Doesn't reflection pretty much imply sending light back in the direction it came?

      No, 'reflection' means sending it onward after reversing the path-component that's orthogonal to the surface.

      'Retro-reflective', I guess, means like Scotch-Lite (or whatever it's called now), where the surface comprises tiny beads each containing the inside of a reflective cube-corner, which has the property of returning a beam (close and) parallel to its entry path... like a billiard ball that just misses the corner pocket.

      Can't imagine that this invisibility cloak passes more than a squint test, though.

      --
      Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly
    6. Re:Contradiction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, light is only reflected back to the orginating light source, So my headlights will appear brighter as I hit you.

    7. Re:Contradiction? by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      It's not really transparent, just a fake of it....kinda like transparency in the current Xserver.

      I hate to tell you, but all the images on your monitor are fake. X does "real" transparency as much as it can display a "real" duck. The API has been around for quite awhile, it's been in KDE for a long time (you can turn the extension on or off, if your X server does not support it). KDE falls back to software transparency (at the widget level, rather than the X level) if it's not available.

      There are no X drivers (afaik) that do it on hardware, if that's what you mean. But the hooks are there for it. There's no 3D hardware acceleration for my setup. but that doesn't mean I can't use OpenGL screensavers; they just run a bit slower.

      --
      Evan "Thanks, Keith"

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    8. Re:Contradiction? by kidgenius · · Score: 1

      Maybe I should've said "translucency". All I meant was how in Gnome at least, the panel and the terminal windows can have transparency. The problem is that it's not "true" tranpsarency. If you put a window behind one of those objects, you won't see it. The way that the fake transparency works is that it takes a picture of your background and sets that as the background for that particular window. Thereby giving the illusion of transparency. The fd.o Xserver supports true transparency. Click here for an example of what I'm saying.

    9. Re:Contradiction? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Ahhhh, I get how this cloak works. The coat isn't anything special - it is just a screen with a camera on the back. From in front of the person, a projector broadcasts the image that the camera took, and the coat acts like a screen.

      However, with a normal screen, the ripples in the fabric would make the reflected projector light go off in different angles, depending on the direction that the fabric is rippling. What this does, by having tiny beads, makes there always be a part of the "screen", all across the person, that is facing a viewer in any direction.

      --
      "She was out of her depth in a shallow pool." -- Peggy Noonan on Sarah Palin
    10. Re:Contradiction? by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Yes. That's what I'm saying. Substitute translucency whereever I said transparency. For awhile now, various variants of X support have had a common API for transparency. Or the illusion of it, just as it supports the illusion of having things like "windows" and a "mouse pointer" on the screen.

      Plenty of X servers don't support 3D or a video overlay. That doesn't mean that X doesn't. X is an extendable protocol, and there's a generally recognized standard extension for transparency.

      The way that the fake transparency works is that it takes a picture of your background and sets that as the background for that particular window. Thereby giving the illusion of transparency. The fd.o Xserver supports true transparency.

      And the fd.o fakes transparency as well. The end result looks and feels better, but it uses the same API. And it's not "real" transparency, since you can't do "real" transparency on a 2d screen. You're always going to be mathematically combining two sets of values somewhere.

      --
      Evan "This is not a pipe".

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    11. Re:Contradiction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this should only be used by Al Franken, when he's wearing his "mobile satellite uplink" getup with the satellite dish on his head.

      Just add a funky poncho, a camera on the back of his belt, and a metal arm reaching forward about 8 feet, with an LCD projector on the end, pointing back at Al's chest.

    12. Re:Contradiction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Blue Screen of Death could take on a whole new meaning if Windows is running the projector.

      "Red Leader, I'm approaching the bunker. They can't see me. The cloaking device is working perfec... wait, what's Dr. Watson starting up for..., oh crap. "

  6. Was I the only one? by Serk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Was I the only one that saw the headline and immediately thought of a gathering of NeXT computer users?

    --
    Never ask a geek why, just nod your head and slowly back away. -Rob Malda
    1. Re:Was I the only one? by Ryan+Huddleston · · Score: 0

      No, I immediately thought of it as well.

      Just like one of my friends thought The Warped Tour (alternative rock metaconcert) was about OS/2 Warp. The geekiness pervades all aspects of life...

    2. Re:Was I the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know I usually hate these type of posts when people intentionally misread something to make a stupid joke but in this case that was my first instinct, too.

    3. Re:Was I the only one? by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 1

      But what if they picked a day when he was busy?

      --
      Beep beep.
    4. Re:Was I the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... all five of them?

  7. One of the more "interesting" exhibits by YodaToo · · Score: 0

    Onlookers gather around as hapless mice mysteriously "disappear" after being placed in one vendor's cutting edge "transporter" device.

    1. Re:One of the more "interesting" exhibits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once built a "long-range stone-transporter device". I used a large rubber-band and a Y-shaped bit of wood.

      That thing was a riot.

  8. I think I'll pass and by Savatte · · Score: 2, Funny

    wait for the next nextfest. The last nextfest didn't leave me looking forward to the next nextfest.

  9. Is that "next" or NeXT"? by jstave · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, I think its pretty funny, given that NeXT Computer played such a pivotal role in making the word "vaporware" part of the common lexicon.

    1. Re:Is that "next" or NeXT"? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Well, the NeXT system is still a nice system, even by today's standards. Great UI, display PostScript, unix-based OS, etc. Just beef up the hardware to modern standards and IMNSHO, it's *still* nicer than Gnome or KDE today.

      As for vaporware, how about Hurd?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    2. Re:Is that "next" or NeXT"? by Arcady13 · · Score: 1

      They did beef up the hardware. It's called a "G5" and it runs the latest version of NeXT OS (renamed to OS X) just fine...

    3. Re:Is that "next" or NeXT"? by TravisWatkins · · Score: 1

      Wait, you mean Hurd is still vaporware?

      --

      "But I'm still right here, giving blood and keeping faith. And I'm still right here."
    4. Re:Is that "next" or NeXT"? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Well, it's about as ready for production use as Duke Nukem: Forever... so by that standard... :)

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  10. Flying cars, yippie by aardwolf204 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In one vision of the future, the world will have flying cars, coats that make people "transparent,'' digital cameras that translate foreign signs and robots that can attend classes for sick children.

    The exhibits include the Moller Skycar, a four-passenger vehicle from Moller International of Davis. The Jetsons-style craft is small enough to drive on the ground, but can take off vertically and fly as fast as 380 mph

    They're still promising me the flying car, spiffy.

    This thing is actually pretty cool:

    http://www.moller.com/
    the M400 Skycar can cruise comfortably at 350+ MPH and achieve up to 28 miles per gallon. Awesome.
    http://www.moller.com/skycar/

    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    1. Re:Flying cars, yippie by mister_doodlebuggs · · Score: 1

      I would drive this to my home aboard the Freedomship

    2. Re:Flying cars, yippie by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Amazing! They're actually making progress! The test plan page lists them as actually doing tethered test flights -- something they've said they'll do "next year" for the past four years.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  11. Brainball by jardin · · Score: 4, Funny

    "For fun and games, there's Brainball, which is best described as an anti- game, because the goal is to achieve nothing."

    Woohoo, I won I won! .. Ah screw it I'm going back to bed ..

    1. Re:Brainball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only game known to mankind that you play better after you die.

      Hold your breath competition.

  12. Didn't the SCO.... by FerretFrottage · · Score: 0

    lawsuit come out of last year's "NextFest"....well a year later and it's still not quite there

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  13. ahah! by abscondment · · Score: 2, Funny

    Transparent cloaks? I knew Harry Potter was real.

  14. More info by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 4, Informative
    A BBC Article on that invisibility cloak.

    Moller website.

    Links are good, people!

    --
    Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
    Africus aut Europaeus?
    1. Re:More info by jstave · · Score: 1

      "The image from the camera is then projected onto the coat, so that the wearer appears virtually transparent when seen through a viewfinder"

      In other words, it looks invisible as long as the person stands where the image can be projected on them and they're viewed through a special viewfinder. Is anyone else underwhelmed by this?

    2. Re:More info by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that shown to be a hoax, much like the supposed see-through skirts in Japan?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    3. Re:More info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Links are good, people!

      True, but you have to take what comes from the BBC with a grain of salt. They aren't exactly trustworthy.

  15. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  16. On the transparent cloak... by Conesus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That transparent cloak is not just for wearing!

    The inventor, Professor Susumu Tachi from Tokyo University, believes that it has practical applications that range from surgery, where the surgeon could be wearing this cloak on his hands to be able to 'see through them', to pilots who wish to be able to see the ground underneath the cockpit, for when they are landing.

    Really, the possibilities are endless. Military, Medical, Transportation, Commericial products.

    Hell, even the napkin holder could use this, so you can have a huge frivolous artsy napkin holder in the center of the table (or a center-piece, something along those lines), and be able to talk to the other person across the table as if nothing were there.

    Of course the technology has to improve until the applications become a reality, but just think what this could enable us to do!

    Conesus.

    --

    Don't eat your soul to fill your belly.
    conesus.com
    1. Re:On the transparent cloak... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B..but if they had this technology, Ben Kenobi wouldn't need to wave his hand at the storm troopers and say "These are not the droids you're looking for." He'd have cloaked them and be completely invisible.

      I'll take Jedi mind trickery over any technology.

      And before anyone argues that Jedis aren't real, this technology ain't exactly quite there yet either. :)

    2. Re:On the transparent cloak... by LS · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know how this thing works???

      LS

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    3. Re:On the transparent cloak... by strictnein · · Score: 2, Interesting

      to pilots who wish to be able to see the ground underneath the cockpit, for when they are landing.

      How would that work in this setup? Where would the projector go in the airplane? This "invention" isn't an invention. It just some trick photography. Why this stupid thing gets so much press is beyond me.

      And how would that be any better than a video screen showing what a small camera on the bottom of the plane is picking up? How are you going to project something onto the bottom of the cockpit? Where would that projector go? And since many (most?) military flights are now being flown at night, what exactly is this going to show?

      I think that idea is completely stupid.

    4. Re:On the transparent cloak... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait until someone wears some transparent pants into the bathroom to see where their poop goes.

    5. Re:On the transparent cloak... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the 500 MPH factor. Not much of a view.

    6. Re:On the transparent cloak... by Halthar · · Score: 1

      I am concerned about prior art, maybe even industrial espionage. Has anyone contacted the company that made Wonder Woman's invisible jet to see if they have had anyone break into their network recently.

      All joking aside, did anyone else see this and have Ghost in the Shell flashbacks?

    7. Re:On the transparent cloak... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Yeah. It's really just a screen with a camera on the back. You have an external projector in front of the object which projects the image onto the screen. What's special about it is the fact that, since the screen is made out of tiny beads, some of the light will get to a user no matter where they're standing. If it were just a normal screen, the light would get bounced in different directions depending on how the fabric is rippling.

      --
      "She was out of her depth in a shallow pool." -- Peggy Noonan on Sarah Palin
    8. Re:On the transparent cloak... by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      God damn it, where are the napkins? Someone turn off the freaking projector so I can get a napkin!

  17. Here we go again... by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ultra-annoying Macromedia Flash!
    I think you mean "an ultra annoying use of Macromedia Flash." It's not the technology's fault that it is abused. In a typical month I'll see about two websites that make an inappropriate use of Flash (i.e. 'skip intro') but in a typical day I'll be bombarded by two dozen popup ads and their spawn-of-the-devil cousins the dreaded kiss-your-page-goodbye- when-you-hit-CTRL-W popunder. I see no complaints from Slashdotters about the evils of JavaScript though. Here's why.
    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:Here we go again... by gears5665 · · Score: 1

      dude! use a popup blocker (Mozilla) and ad blocker (Privoxy)!

    2. Re:Here we go again... by happyfrogcow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      as for JavaScript, most slashdotters probably have popups blocked already. a lot of them also probably don't even bother installing Flash with firefox. i tried once, firefox slowed down considerably even on pages that don't have flash in them, and my cpu usage never went below 40% even when i wasn't doing anything. I'll blame the technology for that one.

    3. Re:Here we go again... by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > I think you mean "an ultra annoying use of Macromedia Flash."

      Unlike, for instance, Homestar Runner.

    4. Re:Here we go again... by abscondment · · Score: 3, Informative

      Flash sucks because it isn't standards compliant.
      Websites that use flash navigation and provide no text alternative are totally unusable by my blind friend. Text -> Speech converters can't touch them.

      Then again, you're probably right that most /.ers dislike it for other reasons. I mean, Slashdot does have a good 170 HTML errors. Even Microsoft beats that (although only by 4).

    5. Re:Here we go again... by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 2
      I see no complaints from Slashdotters about the evils of JavaScript though.
      Having JavaScript enabled gives attackers one more potential security hole.
      How's that?

      JavaScript and Flash can both be turned off.
      IMO, any web site that does not allow you to navigate with all of that crap turned off is not worth visiting.
      And I have all of that crap turned off.
      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  18. does this just scare me? by AgtSmith · · Score: 1, Funny

    "GE Medical Systems will demonstrate a prototype medical technology designed to give surgeons access to patients' data while operating, without having to touch a computer or other object that would require them to re- sterilize their hands. The technology, being developed with Microsoft..." I don't think my insurance covers BSOD.

    --
    Sig removed by order of FBI Patriot ACT
    1. Re:does this just scare me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When was the last time you saw a BSOD?

      I haven't seen one in two years (and I don't use Linux. I only use Windows).

  19. It looks cool, but... by CatLord42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They're trying to make it a future-tech world's fair event, but looking at the event website, it looks more like demos and marketing. Although it does look really cool, it's not cool enough for me to pay to see their advertisements!

    Sorry, but I'm not paying $15/person/day (even if there's really only one day's worth of stuff according to the schedule), to see a bunch of companies throw their future-tech marketing at me. It doesn't seem that cool (and yes, I live in the area, so I could go, and I'm employed, so I could afford to go).

    But then, maybe I'm just in a bad mood.

    --
    Meow. Now!
    1. Re:It looks cool, but... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      'Sorry, but I'm not paying $15/person/day (even if there's really only one day's worth of stuff according to the schedule), to see a bunch of companies throw their future-tech marketing at me."

      But it could be fun to go just to have them pitch their ideas and then poke very logical holes in them, and ask them very simple questions and watch them be completely unable to answer them.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  20. Invisible Cloak... by Lugor · · Score: 0

    WTF? That is so old technology. I've had a working invisible suit for such a long time. Check this pic out, I'm standing right beside Bush giving him the bunny ears. And everyone is clapping too! You should the other places I get into!!

  21. It will be awful by Tarantolato · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First of all, the site has a Flash intro that's more epilepsy-inducing than the latest Japanese cartoon craze.

    Second of all, it's sponsored by Wired. I remember picking up one of the early issues and there was all this stuff about VR. If this were the early 90's, VR would be all over NextFest or whatever it's called.

    Anyways, it sounded like a cool idea and all until the inventor dude talked about the actual applications. He had had a party the last night, and everyone had to pretend they were lobsters. They wore the low-res headsets and had to use the special gloves to make pincer movements with their hands.

    It was then that I concluded that VR wasn't what it promised to be. Also that Wired was basically a newer Omni, but without the virtue of being published by a pr0n baron.

    1. Re:It will be awful by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Wired seemed to be kind of a trash magazine. I certainly haven't done ad counts and such, but it seems to have more ad pages per article page than any other magazine I've seen. The designers of the ads and the magazine as a whole seem to be of the school of thought that tacky == high tech & cool.

      I still remember an article that suggested that computer users should be willing to give up their right for computer DVD drives under the illusion that George Lucas would suddenly feel comfortable in releasing his movies on DVD. I think I spotted nine or ten logical flaws in that article. I figured if the editors let that pass, then the magazine probably wasn't worth reading.

    2. Re:It will be awful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was a joke you fag

  22. It's a Scam by ewhac · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Moller's been been taking investors' money for decades, and has exactly squat to show for it. Credible aerospace engineers say that, unless Moller's invented a radically new, ultra-compact engine, there's no way you can move enough air mass to actually lift the thing.

    The spiffy model on the showroom floor is nothing more than a stage prop. It doesn't fly, it never did, and it probably never will.

    Schwab

    1. Re:It's a Scam by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Moller's been been taking investors' money for decades, and has exactly squat to show for it. Credible aerospace engineers say that, unless Moller's invented a radically new, ultra-compact engine, there's no way you can move enough air mass to actually lift the thing.

      The spiffy model on the showroom floor is nothing more than a stage prop. It doesn't fly, it never did, and it probably never will.


      They've got some pictures of the thing supposedly doing tethered test flights. The first photo looks like it could have been faked, either by double photography or using the crane to actually lift the thing. I'm not sure about the second.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:It's a Scam by funny-jack · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What's worse, is that there are still people who haven't heard of this thing, and learned long ago that it's all hot air. For goodness' sake, I read about these when I was 10. I'm 24 now. I gave up hope in these things years ago, and so should all of you.

      --
      You probably shouldn't click this.
    3. Re:It's a Scam by hambonewilkins · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've seen video on a show of it doing a tethered flight... it's real. How much more than a tethered flight is yet to be seen.

      --

      God Bless America. Why? Did it sneeze?
    4. Re:It's a Scam by Rei · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They've not only done tethered flight tests, they've done tethered flight tests out of ground effect. Not only do they have pictures, they have videos. They not only have Aerobots (similar tech), they've already sold some which are in use.

      Accept it. The thing is real. You can argue about stability, you can argue about fuel effiency, you can argue about a whole bunch of things (especially their overly optimistic scheduling!), but the fact remains that even with only partially-outputting engines, they got cleanly and smoothly out of ground effect. They're building a free flight range right now and fitting the skycar with its 8 full-power engines.

      Most of the tech seems solid. The engines for the skycar already exist, and they're quite powerful for their weight while still being efficient. If the segway can keep a person balanced and a rocket can keep itself oriented correctly through gimballing of thrust, there should be no problem keeping the skycar level even in turbulence through computer controlled thrust vectoring. Etc.

      While it is no easy task, and I doubt their mass production cost estimate will ever reach fruition (having it instead be both a "rich kid's toy" and an intra-regional taxi to get people from small airports to big hubs), the tech is solid, and they've made some serious progress.

      --
      "She was out of her depth in a shallow pool." -- Peggy Noonan on Sarah Palin
    5. Re:It's a Scam by infowantsto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you watch the 2003 video clips, you'll notice that while the aircar appears to have 'some' thrust, the tether reaching up to the crane not shown is taut the entire time, and the vehicle swings back and forth. It appears that they're getting the stabilization issue down, but have a bit of work to do on the thrust aspect of the project (still).

    6. Re:It's a Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Accept it. The thing is real.

      Nothing is real until it appears on ThinkGeek.

    7. Re:It's a Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen it. It is real. Kinda pointless, but real.

  23. Re:Suggestion by jardin · · Score: 0

    one one one eleven

  24. Oh, it's for new things? by General+Sherman · · Score: 1

    So, I shouldn't bring my cube?

    --
    - Sherman
  25. Since the Moller Skycar will require ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 1

    the implementation of the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) AND an operational virtual highway system to automate piloting the devices, will I be able to play Duke Nukem Forever with my skycar-mates while we're on our way to work? The four of us can surely put together the $995,000 ($100,000 down now) necessary for one of the first positions once they're ready.

  26. Non-corporate innovation by overloadhz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Each day. Around the world. The future is born.

    While NextFest seems to showcase some cool stuff, it does not seem to highlight the innovative underpinnings to these gadgets, which are often created/discovered by individuals, independent groups and academics. The science behind the gadgetry (i.e. The Robotics Institute) is often more interesting, IMHO.

    While I know that's not the purpose of NextFest, it's just interesting to me to think that "the future is born" of smart individuals collaborating (obvious example == F/OSS), not necessarily from "leading visionary companies".

  27. a little late by s7726 · · Score: 1

    would have been nice to get this a little earlier to take advantage of the free student passes that go down today. I have the day off too, i have to work all weekend.

  28. Optical Camouflage by shish · · Score: 3, Interesting
    --
    I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
  29. Ummm by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny
    Other health-related technology on display will include an antibacterial powder developed at the University of Alberta that, when sprinkled on food, can block the harmful effects of bacteria.

    Like digestion for example???

    1. Re:Ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm waiting for the crystals that when you sprinkle it on mud, freezes the water in it at room temperature.

    2. Re:Ummm by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      Yeah. But it will also block the harmful effects of bacterias that cause indigestion, the opposite of digestion. This causes a logical paradox that makes the antibacterial powder cease to exist, so the real use of the powder is storage. You can now store infinite amounts of antibacterial powder on food.

  30. Nano by 1000101 · · Score: 1

    That site has a terrible design. I couldn't find any "nano" technologies though. It seems like it should be there somewhere.

    1. Re:Nano by radish · · Score: 1

      You obviously can't find them because they're so tiny...

      Sorry :)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  31. invisisble cloak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    reminds me of ghost in the shell. definately gonna see the military jumping (like they haven't already) on this... brings new meaning to being stealthy...

    1. Re:invisisble cloak by Gunfighter · · Score: 1

      Thank you! I knew I was forgetting something in my list of enhancements.

      --
      -- Stu

      /. ID under 2,000. I feel old now.
    2. Re:invisisble cloak by Rei · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ... not unless they want to carry projectors in front of themselves, and know that their enemies are going to be in one specific direction, and don't mind low quality images... (etc)

      --
      "She was out of her depth in a shallow pool." -- Peggy Noonan on Sarah Palin
    3. Re:invisisble cloak by matmota · · Score: 1
      ... not unless they want to carry projectors in front of themselves, and know that their enemies are going to be in one specific direction, and don't mind low quality images... (etc)

      They just need to ask their enemies to hold the projector for them, and they will solve the first two problems at once.

  32. Brainball by nizo · · Score: 2, Funny
    The object of the game is to move the ball into an opponent's goal area, but the more relaxed a player is, the more he or she controls the ball.

    The only game known to mankind that you play better after you die.

  33. BlehFest by ddtstudio · · Score: 3, Informative

    Took a quick swing by Fort Mason (the location) and saw some vendor trucks, but also saw the floor space being curtained off -- not a good sign for attendance, either by exhibitors or by teh curious. Of course, this is sponsored by Wired, the magazine for people who think they're cool because they read Wired.

    Not bitter, just tired of it.

    1. Re:BlehFest by radish · · Score: 1

      Wired, the magazine for people who think they're cool because they read Wired

      I subscribe to Wired, but rarely actually read it. I'm not sure if that makes me cool, dumb, or just broke.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    2. Re:BlehFest by Maserati · · Score: 1

      I still check out wired once or twice a year, just to see if they've moved themselves to the "Tired" column.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
  34. Non-vapourware from Microsoft by gmuslera · · Score: 1
    [...] The technology, being developed with Microsoft, uses simple hand gestures and voice commands to allow a surgeon to select data displayed on a flat-panel monitor.

    Microsoft always make people to do hand gestures at it, even when that gestures are usually like raising a finger.

  35. brainball? sounds familiar... by funny-jack · · Score: 1

    For fun and games, there's Brainball, which is best described as an anti- game, because the goal is to achieve nothing.

    So, has Brainball been "almost there" for over four years now?

    --
    You probably shouldn't click this.
  36. It's meant to be "out there" by LeiGong · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To all of the posters that are critisizing the expo as a vapor-fest, I say to you, why not let your imagination run wild? Decades ago we had Worlds Fair and the famous Futurama in New York. People were left in awe of possible future technologies that improve quality of life. People came back wide eyed and filled with imagination. The closest thing I experienced to something like this today was a showcase at Disney Expo 12 years ago when I was 10... It had on display futuristic cars and possible technologies that openned my youthful imagination. It made a big impact on me and got me interested in technology. I hear people complain about the lack of innovation today and I'm personally disappointed at the lack of creativity in a lot of industries. In the 40s and 50s people got to see glimpses of the future presented by GE and Ford where everything is automated. People were happy and it gave them something worthwhile to look forward to. It gave us faith in technology. We have nothing like this today. I for one welcome conventions that inspire us, especially at a time when the future looks so bleak. Sure, it's funded by big corporations but so were the World Fairs in the past and they turned out great!

  37. Expensive and inaccurate by Rei · · Score: 1

    If there is a camera taking a picture from one side and putting it on another side, there are a number of problems. For one, the display can't be cheap - it is a life-sized monitor, to put it bluntly. Secondly, unless there are cameras coming from all sorts of angles in 3d, even if you can manage to have the light from different cameras go in different directions, you're going to have a huge "sprite" problem. To resolve it, you need many cameras and many times more, highly "directional" pixels. Third, unless you have an awful lot of cameras, you'll have severe problems with with distance perception. It gets worse; the more cameras and pixels you have, the harder the task becomes to move the data around across the surface of the outfit.

    I did have an idea once for something that might make this simpler than a gigantic, intricate network of billions of pixels and thousands of cameras, but I'm not sure if the physics are sound. The idea relates to downconversion. Does anyone know whether, for example, if you were to take a laser of frequency 500.01 THz, and combine the beam with a laser of frequency 500.00 THz, will you get a resulting 10GHz beam that can pass through objects as a normal 10GHz transmission would? Additionally, although not necessary to what I was thinking (but I'm just trying to understand the physics better), if you were to combine beams at an slight angle so that they will diverge after passing through an object, what will happen?

    Anyone have a background in optics that might know the answer to these?

    --
    "She was out of her depth in a shallow pool." -- Peggy Noonan on Sarah Palin
    1. Re:Expensive and inaccurate by dlakelan · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... For the most part, you will get an interference pattern at the point of interference with beat frequency 10GHz and carrier frequency 500.05 THz

      As the beams diverge they will pass through each other as if they had never interacted.

      If you look at what occurs on the quantum level, you will get a mixture of 500.0 and 500.1THz photons interacting with matter in a way that is spatially and temporally determined by the interference pattern caused by the two beams. You will NOT get 10GHz photons to any appreciable degree, unless I'm unaware of some sophisticated quantum effect.

      --
      ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) http://www.endpointcomputing.com a scientific approach to custom computing.
    2. Re:Expensive and inaccurate by Rei · · Score: 1

      I'm not quite seing what I was asking about in that response. What I am wondering is whether the 10GHz would pass through a solid object (in the way that the initial visible light beams would not). The same question goes with the beams that later diverge. I have never been able to track down any material which addresses this (including my physics texts from college).

      --
      "She was out of her depth in a shallow pool." -- Peggy Noonan on Sarah Palin
  38. emote-controlled PackBot by davidpfarrell · · Score: 1
    From caption of image with guy kneeling (emphasis is mine):

    "Tom Ryden of iRobot with a emote-controlled PackBot being used in Iraq..."

    I suspect this is so that it can be easily controlled through AIM over a cell phone.

    --
    Cube On! (http://stores.ebay.com/PuzzleProz)
  39. It's not a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Moller's been been taking investors' money for decades, and has exactly squat to show for it.

    It's true that he has been taking money from investors for decades, but he's been pouring his own money into it as well. He made about $20 million from real estate investment and millions more from his invention of the SuperTrapp muffler. He invested that in his company. So while it's true that he has been taking money from others, he hasn't been getting rich from it, as the word "scam" implies.

    Credible aerospace engineers say that, unless Moller's invented a radically new, ultra-compact engine, there's no way you can move enough air mass to actually lift the thing.

    Dr. Moller is a credible aerospace engineer. He is the started the Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering at UC Davis. And he has invented a new type of engine for the SkyCar.

    The spiffy model on the showroom floor is nothing more than a stage prop. It doesn't fly, it never did, and it probably never will.

    As someone else pointed out, there have been tethered tests that have shown that the thing can at least hover.

    Don't get me wrong. I think that Moller's claims are continually over-optimistic, even to the point that he got in trouble with the SEC for misleading investors. He's been over-promising and under-delivering for decades. But he has made slow, painful progress, and I've seen every indication that he really does believe in what he's doing.

    To call it a scam is completely unfair.

    1. Re:It's not a scam by zeno_2 · · Score: 2, Informative
      And he has invented a new type of engine for the SkyCar.

      Ahh.. so, taking an existing engine type (Wankel rotary engine) and improving it a bit is now called, "inventing a new type of engine". I'm sorry but that type of engine has been around for 50 years..

      In any case I hope he succeeds, it sure looks like it would be fun to drive, or fly, or whatever..

  40. Keep Time in Mind-The Future Sucks by Chagatai · · Score: 4, Interesting
    While I agree with the parent poster's statement that seeing such stuff inspires the imagination, keep in mind the world in which Disney presented things.

    People who were living during the 1950s and 1960s saw advances that would have been considered acts of magic fifty years before; if someone from the 1890s or 1900s were transported into the 60s, they would have been totally caught off-guard. Vehicles that could allow you to travel on any road at 55 mph? Devices that allow you to see and hear images of people thousands of miles away? A large tower that could put someone on the moon? It would be a fantasy world.

    Now, take someone from the 1950s or 1960s and put them into the current 21st century. Imagine this conversation:

    "So, do you have your hovercar now?"
    No, but now we have cars that can run on electricity, some of the time!
    "Well, how about the Moon or Mars? Do you have friends who live on bases up there?"
    No, we went to the moon a few times with a couple dozen people, and that was it. We have had a couple of space stations, but only one is left because the others crashed after funding was cut.
    "What about diseases? Have you cured cancer?"
    No, we have had some progress, but there are some even worse diseases now.
    "Is there any new technology that is actually good, then?! Jetpacks? Super-buildings? Contact with aliens?"
    Well, we did shrink the size of computers and made them hundreds of times faster, and anyone can communicate with anyone else in the world real-time. We can store large quantities of data on small disks. Here, check this out...
    (The computer accidentally gets rerouted to Goatse.)
    "AAUAAUAGGHHH! My word, what is wrong with that man's bottom?"

    Face it, the future largely sucks. I want my hovcercraft.

    --
    --Chag
  41. Yea - but the researchers referenced GITS(!) by janbjurstrom · · Score: 1

    I also thought this sounded waaay cool, so I quick-searched for Tachi Labs that is doing the research. Good links on that page to further info, images, videos. And such a cool reference 'section' (bottom of that page):

    "M. Shiro, Ghost in the Shell, Kodansya, 1991" (link added by me)

    With earlier /. reports on the Nausicaa jet, the Akira bike, and now this Cloaking thing (ok, so it's not really matching Kusanagi & crew's wicked cloaking tech in GITS, but still...) ...I don't know what to make of it, but I think it's pretty cool that they get inspiration for their R&D from somewhat 'unlikely' places - and really follow through on those quirky ideas.

    Gotta respect that kind of curiosity and dedication.

    --
    668.5
  42. well that's interesting, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... it doesn't answer the IMPORTANT question, which is..

    will you get SPIDER POWERS with it if you shine it on a spider and let it bite you?

  43. It's what WE make it. by MrChuck · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I still have my NeXTSlab and ColorCube - both working thank you. And running NeXTStep 3.3 thanks to their Y2K free OS CD to keep my machine ticking into the new millenium.

    Yeah baby: 33 and 40Mhz of pure power . With that "mainframe on a chip" Digital Signal Processor.

    Ok, one of the NeXTs has booted open source, but then I figured why run NeXT if not for the OS?

    So lets all show up with our NeXT slabs under our arms and start a commotion!

  44. I Think I'll Pass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They were pushing this at last night's SF Giants game, with the 7th inning stretch's "Take Me Out to the Ballgame" being "sung" by a laptop - the place erupted in boos.
    Now if they could get an electronic Harry Carey ....

  45. invisibility videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://projects.star.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/projects/MEDI A/xv/oc.html Videos of the invisibility cloak in action :)

  46. Moller vaporware by Animats · · Score: 1
    Not Moller again.

    I have a copy of Moller's 1974 brochure, Yes, 1974. Back then, he was going to have a test flight Real Soon Now, and commercial sales were a year or two away. Thirty years later, he's going to have a test flight Real Soon Now, and commercial sales are a year or two away.

    There's no reason this can't be done. After all, the Hiller Flying Platform did it fifty years ago. But Moller has no credibility left.

  47. Disappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it was a convention for NextStep fans.

  48. Fort fucking mason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who in gods fucking name chose fort motherfucking mason? no where near down town a pain in the god dam ass to park at small as hell and doesn't inspire future. For fucks sake wired good mag HORID location scouts

  49. What is this, bash Moller day? by Gldm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah ok Moller has been promising the moon for ages and hasn't delivered yet. But at least he's Doing Something (TM). You can see prototypes, I've seen the video of the tethered flight. How many of you people bitching about his lack of progress have a flying car doing test flights in your back yard? Anyone? Until someone else shows me at least the same amount of progress he has you can shut up.

    As for the transparent cloak... it's spiffy yes. All you need is a visible camera behind you and a visible projector in front of you and you can be invisible to people who can't spot cameras or projectors and come at you from one direction. Yay.

    You know what I want to see? I want to see a PDA that doesn't suck i.e. lack a HD, or wireles connection, or ability to run mainstream software. I want to see an OS that can be both stable and play the latest games without screwing around with drivers and compiling shit all day or getting "Well it plays MOST games under emulation, except the ones YOU want." I want to see a broadband connection at a reasonable price that doesn't have shitty upstream or fulltime forced NAT or get capped as soon as you actually use the damn thing. Why doesn't anyone invent any of that stuff?

    --

    Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

    1. Re:What is this, bash Moller day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im attending, Ill tell you how it turns out. Please rate this message with the worst possible outcome. Thanks.

  50. And coming up later this month by Riktov · · Score: 1

    AmigaFest (nothing to do with old multimedia computers, just people with female friends), and BeFest (nothing to do with a multitasking "media OS", just people pondering existence).

  51. Re:It's a Scam - Is it really? by turgid · · Score: 3, Informative
    Credible aerospace engineers say that, unless Moller's invented a radically new, ultra-compact engine, there's no way you can move enough air mass to actually lift the thing.

    It's called a Wankel engine and is conventiently ignored by the majority of engineers because they remember the engine sealing problems with the early NSU Ro80 in the late 60's that almost bankrupted them.

    Talk to most people about the Wankel engine and the chances are they've never heard of it. Many engineers laugh when you mention it, because they remember 1967 and haven't heard of all the developments since then. My old (1983) Mazda RX7 did 127000+ miles before the engine wore out.

    The spiffy model on the showroom floor is nothing more than a stage prop. It doesn't fly, it never did, and it probably never will.

    Unless the man is a bare-faced lier, you can find out all sorts of things about it at moller.com.

    Need I remind you that VTOL aeroplanes have been built before (albeit with jet engines).

  52. I went. It was cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was also packed with people by 11 am, with tons more on their way in as I left.

    The parking lot was full at 9am.

    And canned AWESOME-O presentation was silly. Just silly. But it was nice to see the predecessor to our future machine masters take its first baby steps up a flight of stairs... and back down again.. ooh. Reminded me of a show at SeaWorld. The fish does some tricks, the perky lady talks too much, the end.

    BrainBall kicked ass. As did the multiple-amputees standing around on high-tech legs.

  53. line too longRe:I went. It was cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    got there 3p sunday. line too long, staffmember announced: "you will not be able to get in anymore, not with this long line". i heard someone muttering: "don't go in, it's a rip-off", so i left. how about better planning for this event?