Slashdot Mirror


Finally Geeks Available in Action Figure Form

Treebiter1 writes "Happy Worker, a specialty toy developer, has introduced a new action figure the "GeekMan Action Figure." Billed as the "a hunk o' hunk of nerdly love." His "super powers" include ungodly coding abilities; opposite sex repulsion; analytical reasoning; ability to create technical acronyms; less than ideal personal hygiene routine. This is kind of an oddity, perhpas I should say it is an oddity, but it might make a funny gag gift."

194 comments

  1. Remember the MCP's? by Jay+Tarbox · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft came out with those action figures a while back... I don't think you can get them anymore though. There were three I think.

    1. Re:Remember the MCP's? by sheldon · · Score: 1

      You mean these?

      Microsoft Certified Professional Action Figures

      [sarcasm]
      This is yet another microsoft innovation being copied by others.[/sarcasm]

  2. first post by shird · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does his super geek powers include the ability to frist post?

    --
    I.O.U One Sig.
    1. Re:first post by Luigi30 · · Score: 1

      I don't think he can frist post, but I think he can first post.

      --
      503 Sig Unavailable

      The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    2. Re:first post by SoSueMe · · Score: 3, Funny
      I don't know, but this part of the page makes me wonder how long before he winds up on a Pron page:
      Toying Around
      And, why not play with your GeekMan? He's a toy, after all... most of all, have fun!
    3. Re:first post by dupper · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm gonna have to go spelling nazi on you, and point out it's 'frist psot'

    4. Re:first post by Ch_Omega · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, his power can only give him second posts, but this doesn't stop him from claiming the "frist post".. :)

    5. Re:first post by linzeal · · Score: 1

      When they start making sex toys in the shape of geeky things and personas we shall rule the earth, muhahhahah.

    6. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought only Bill Frist could 'frist post'.. (he's a Congressman/Senator with a misspelled last name).

    7. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you some kind of fcuking freak?

    8. Re:first post by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Sigh...when I was a a kid, I heard about the geek stereotype, and thought that the mental and social aspects greatly resembled my own situation.

      So I didn't bother avoiding the physical aspect. Now I'm working to lose a lot of that bit. Unfortunately, it takes an awful lot of exercise to power a computer, so I've had to resort to more mondane (thus less effective) methods.

    9. Re:first post by Wilk4 · · Score: 1

      his might, but evidently yours don't ;-)

    10. Re:first post by Luigi30 · · Score: 1

      Yes. Yes, I am.

      --
      503 Sig Unavailable

      The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
  3. Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    But does it fart like RMS?

    1. Re:Great... by Woy · · Score: 1

      +4 Funny? Is this a multi-troll attack, one posting and the others modding?

      --
      "If God created us in his own image we have more than reciprocated." - Voltaire
    2. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a troll story, a usless plug for someone's website. I don't understand why anyone would waste mod points on it.

  4. I need a lawyer. by maeka · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where do I sue for unauthorized use of my likeness?

    1. Re:I need a lawyer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Get in touch with SCO

  5. Not 5.25 inches tall? by zakezuke · · Score: 3, Funny

    If they really want to be geeky, he's got to be the size of those retro floppy disks. Or 8 inches tall but then he couldn't live in a drive bay.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    1. Re:Not 5.25 inches tall? by Ryan+Huddleston · · Score: 0

      Depends on how old-school your computer is...

      l8 inches could be a possibility :-)

    2. Re:Not 5.25 inches tall? by Ryan+Huddleston · · Score: 0

      d'oh! ****ing typo. :s/18/8

    3. Re:Not 5.25 inches tall? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Ok, technicaly I have some 10inch SMD drives tucked away somewhere... but they are not practical for an every day desktop machine.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    4. Re:Not 5.25 inches tall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or 8 inches tall but then he couldn't live in a drive bay.

      Oh yeah? Tell that to my PDP-11!

  6. Are there evil figures available? by ziggamon · · Score: 5, Funny

    It'd be cool to be able to fight Darl McBride being Linus =)

  7. Also seen Einstein by zoefff · · Score: 1

    Ive seen the Einstein action figure a while ago, including a belly! Wonder what HIS capabilities are?

    1. Re:Also seen Einstein by SoSueMe · · Score: 4, Funny
      The theme song tells you:

      GeekMan Theme Song - Lyrics

      Geek-Man, Geek-Man, Geek-Man,
      Geek-Man, GeekMan!

      He's a brainiac,
      Busting books, coding hack,
      GeekMan!

      With one glance from his eyes,
      logic seems to materialize,
      GeekMan!

      Taped glasses and pocket implants,
      Belt to his elbows, he's one smarty pants...
      Deep underground in his secret computer lair,
      Powered by junk food, caffeine and his monitor glare.
      (he's a key clacking code hacking thinking machine...) He's GeekMan...

      Evil business types, look out!
      If he's on the scene, reason reigns throughout.
      Go go go, gogogo tech gadget belt...
      look out Internet girls, he's looking so 'svelte!
      (What a hunk'o'hunk'o' nerdy love...) He's GeekMan!

      Propeller head, computer freak,
      He's the super-alpha-uber-geek,
      GeekMan!

      Geek-Man, Geek-Man, Geek-Man,
      Geek-Man, GeekMannnnn!
    2. Re:Also seen Einstein by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Also seen Einstein by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wonder what HIS capabilities are? Careful, HIS WORDS ARE BACKED BY NUCLEAR WEAPONS! (No, It's not yelling, it's quoting Civ.)

    4. Re:Also seen Einstein by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it.

  8. Wow... by LaBlueCow · · Score: 1

    This is just ... beyond words. As a geek with a decent sized figure collection (mostly Spawn and Anime figures), I might consider adding this for novelty. Then again, last time I bought a figure I couldn't see in person, I heavily regretted it...
    The ability to code superbly? Hmm...

    --
    [SQL Error ID 10-T: This sig. is above your current threshold.]
  9. is it just me by jbellis · · Score: 4, Funny

    or does GeekMan remind you of Bill Gates?

    1. Re:is it just me by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

      If it comes with the bank account then I'm having 10 of 'em

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:is it just me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ungodly coding abilities

      No.

    3. Re:is it just me by Lord+Graga · · Score: 1

      Yes he does. The site says that his catchphrase is: "Oh, that's not a bug! It's a feature!" ;)

  10. Hm by lvdrproject · · Score: 4, Funny

    They might consider getting their very own GeekMan to make sure that their site renders properly in Gecko and Opera. :/

    1. Re:Hm by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 0

      You probably didn't get it
      How'd it be a page for a geekman toy if it renders properly!?!?

    2. Re:Hm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks okay to me (Firefox, that's Gecko isn't it?). What's wrong with it?

    3. Re:Hm by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      "They might consider getting their very own GeekMan to make sure that their site renders properly in Gecko and Opera. :/"

      And iCab , too!

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    4. Re:Hm by OneHungLo · · Score: 1

      The alignment is fucked in Gecko. Some of the text graphics don't line up properly.

    5. Re:Hm by lvdrproject · · Score: 1

      iCab's CSS implementation is broken, anyway, though, isn't it? Or is that just the old version?

    6. Re:Hm by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      It's still broken. I'm using the latest version, 2.9.8.

      And yet, there are other sites who use the same multiple tiny images to form one big image thing where iCab displays everything perfectly.

      Supposedly, version 3 will have working CSS.

      Still and all, it's still the best browser for the Classic Mac OS environment. Hell, they STILL support 68K Macs under System 7.6.1!

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
  11. Can't buy online? by blixel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The link to "Buy One Now" just takes you to a list of store locations. That's not very geeky.

    1. Re:Can't buy online? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The where to buy option has three options: online, canada, and U.S.

      In the online category, there are three websites that sell Geek Man online.

    2. Re:Can't buy online? by NineNine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Buying online is a good way for a manufacturer to alienate their wholesalers. Selling online is nice and all, but it's not nearly as effective as having an army of real retailers selling your product. As a retailer, I am *much* less likely to carry a product that is also sold online, undercutting my own business.

    3. Re:Can't buy online? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes. We know, we know... You're a retailer. Get over it.

      Realistically, unless you're selling home theater equipment, car audio or a few other niche things, there isn't much that you can't get online. That's just the way it is.

    4. Re:Can't buy online? by linzeal · · Score: 1

      But isn't everything alrady sold online, pretty much?

    5. Re:Can't buy online? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actully a lot of companies that make (or I should say have something made for them) and sell their wares directly to the public do not sell it at a discount instead they sell it at the msrp. This is obviously to make it so that the retailers don't say, "hey I can't beat that price", "why should I have to compete with the manufactor" and so forth. I think another part of the reason is that runing an online store is expansive and requires more thought. You need more then a handful of poeple to do it if you are getting more then a trivial number of sales. You then need someone to manage them, Then you have to make sure no one is stealing. It is a real pain in the neck.Plus, since most products are available online from other retailers, there is no point in compete with people who want to anyway move your product.

    6. Re:Can't buy online? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >As a retailer, I am *much* less likely to carry a product that is also sold online, undercutting my own business.

      Err, not usually. Maybe thats your personal opinion but consider the following:

      1. No waiting and no shipping charges.

      2. The overall effect on sales if your store is perceived as not being able to stock popular or novel items, i.e. becoming stale.

      As a consumer, if I want something and I know I can get it online or through retail I will go the proper route depending on my priority. I really wanted to play City of Heroes; so I bought it retail.
      I wanted a book, but I knew I wont start reading it for some time, so I paid shipping and dealt with the 3-4 days delivery.

      If anything online sales are simply readjusting what retail can offer, not eliminating it. An impulse item like the Geekman belongs in retail, somewhere near the registers.

  12. Google Cache by 1nhuman · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    The glass is half-full. With poison. And there are cracks in the glass. The dirty, dirty glass.
  13. Shouldn't that be "Inaction Figures?"... by ErnstKompressor · · Score: 5, Funny

    All Phear 'Sedentary Man's' l33t 5ki115...

    --
    We apologise for the fault in this post. Those responsible have been sacked. -- Signed RICHARD M. NIXON
  14. Another shill article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I love slashdot, but I'm starting to hate the growing number of product placements within stories. I'm beginning to suspect that "the slashdot effect" is being used as a marketing tool - but whom by is the key question. Is it rogue marketeers, or are the Slashdot/VA Linux bigwigs complicit?

  15. Geek Action Figures I'd Rather See by Seumas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Instead of some generic geek cheaply made action-figure, I'd rather see a high quality series of action figures that depict real geeks that we all respect, admire, like or... at least know of.

    The following, for starters:

    RMS
    ESR
    Alan Cox
    John "Maddog" Hall
    Linus Torvalds
    Capn'Crunch
    Kevin Mitnick

    And of course, more traditional scientific geeks like:

    Linus Paulings
    Albert Einstein
    Charles Babbage

    And famous literary or movie geeks from our favorite 80's and 90's films.

    In fact, I kind of thought that's what the Action Figure in this article was going to be like until I went to the site... :(

    1. Re:Geek Action Figures I'd Rather See by Celvin · · Score: 2, Funny

      We could make a whole series, with cartoons and everything! We do off course need some villains. How'bout Darl, Gates, Balmer, (Gore?), anyone else?. They could have a huge villain-castle (with armed guards, shark-pools, doomsdaybuttons and everything!) on a cliff somewhere where they could plan out their world domination schemes, by the means of evil software and huge lawsuits (imagine Darls army of evil lawyers and gates' army of evil coders!)

      Then they could get their ass kicked by FOSS-gang (we need a cooler name), and the world could be saved, untill same time next friday (I can hear Darl shouting: "I will come again! Do you hear me!? I will get you the next time! Arrrgh!").

      We could earn millions! And this way we can spread the word of FOSS to kids around the world via Cartoon Network! Our own little world-domination scheme, he he (slightly manical laughter). Worth thinking about. Any goot cartoon-artists here? I can write the script! Anyone??

      --
      -- If ignorance is bliss, why aren't there more happy people?
    2. Re:Geek Action Figures I'd Rather See by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      and how about having a mini cd in the box with .. RMS ---debian ESR---- bsd Alan Cox ---fedora John "Maddog" Hall ---Suse Linus Torvalds ---Mandrake Capn'Crunch ----- (some sort of att type nix) Kevin Mitnick ---- a forensic kit And of course, more traditional scientific geeks like: Linus Paulings --- chemistry programs Albert Einstein -- physics programs Charles Babbage -- math programs

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    3. Re:Geek Action Figures I'd Rather See by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I hope your "(Gore?)" insertion was a joke, because otherwise, you are a fucking idiot. Al Gore is a serious friend of the internet in that its acceptance and adoption by non-military segments of the government would have been dramatically slower without his influence.

      If you were just getting in a little jab, then I haven't said anything to you. If you were serious, please go jump off something tall without protection.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Geek Action Figures I'd Rather See by AnuradhaRatnaweera · · Score: 1

      How about Ken Coar??

    5. Re:Geek Action Figures I'd Rather See by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Balmer would have super-monkey powers. Run around, jumping up and down making squeaky Howard Dean-esque hoots and flinging bananas at you.

      Gates would just assume the form of Satan and suck all the will from your soul, until you hand it over for a very modest price.

      Darl would be totally ineffective, largely doing nothing but slinging threats at you that he could never back up and accusing you of stealing his patented Mojo.

    6. Re:Geek Action Figures I'd Rather See by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone forgot to take his pill this morning, didn't he?

      Don't worry We love Gore. After all, we use his invention every day!

    7. Re:Geek Action Figures I'd Rather See by MykeBNY · · Score: 1

      I don't know about anyone else, but I'd buy a Woz.

    8. Re:Geek Action Figures I'd Rather See by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the one hand, he helped commercialize the internet, which made it easy for you and me to get on it. On the other hand, he helped commercialize the internet, which made it a giant gossip column and garage sale.

      Maybe he could be one of the morally ambiguous characters. Sometimes on the good guys' side and sometimes one of the bad guys.

    9. Re:Geek Action Figures I'd Rather See by Seumas · · Score: 2, Funny

      Plus, he has almost as much personality as a UDP packet.

    10. Re:Geek Action Figures I'd Rather See by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Jobs and Wozniack figures would be sweet!

      If I had the know-how, I would persue something like this, except the big-wigs would never authorize the use of their likeness. I'm sure Woz and ESR and Linus might, but I don't think Jobs and Gates or Balmer or any of those guys would.

      Still, if someone put out a high-quality series of true geek figures, I would absolutely buy the whole set. Especially if they came with lots of detailed information about the person on CD.

    11. Re:Geek Action Figures I'd Rather See by foo2u2 · · Score: 1

      How about one of Benoit Mandelbrot? (I don't actually want an action figure; I just like saying "Benoit Mandelbrot").

    12. Re:Geek Action Figures I'd Rather See by Piquan · · Score: 1

      How about one of Benoit Mandelbrot?

      The manufacturing process can't do fine enough detail.

    13. Re:Geek Action Figures I'd Rather See by sargatanas · · Score: 1

      Just to summarize these great thoughts:

      Heroes:
      Richard Stallman
      Eric Raymond
      Linus Torvalds
      Capn'Crunch
      Kevin Mitnick
      Albert Einstein
      Charles Babbage
      the l0ft

      Heroes' Weapons:
      Debian
      Fedora
      Knoppix (can't forget this one!)
      "Cathedral/Bazaar"
      Captain Crunch Whistle
      Jolt
      LOTR books

      Villians:
      Darl McBride
      Bill Gates
      Steve Ballmer
      Ken Brown
      Jack Valenti
      Hilary Rosen

      Somebody's gotta make a comic book or something...

    14. Re:Geek Action Figures I'd Rather See by wintermute1974 · · Score: 1

      I would also recommend we create action figures for:

      Douglas Engelbart for the oNLine System.
      Alan Kay for smalltalk.
      J.C.R. Licklidder for decades of foresight.
      Bob Taylor for Xerox PARC's computers.
      Claude Shannon for the bit.

      Us modern-day knowledge workers owe our very livelihoods to these pioneers of computation. What better tribute is there than to immortalize them in plastic?

    15. Re:Geek Action Figures I'd Rather See by wintermute1974 · · Score: 1

      The market may not be big enough to justify geeky action figures of each and every hero we have.

      Instead, I propose that we create a set of trading cards with a piece of bubble gum inside it. These would be something like the cards that suck.com made a few years ago, only with people that weren't all 15-minute famers.

      The production costs would be less for cards than figures, they are more easily packed and shipped, and their cost will be less, letting even the independently impoverished (as opposed to wealthy) geek collect them.

      I'd gladly trade one of my five copies of Charles Babbage for one of your obscure Teilhard de Chardin trading cards!

    16. Re:Geek Action Figures I'd Rather See by wintermute1974 · · Score: 1

      the big-wigs would never authorize the use of their likeness

      Yes, I could imagine a few of them might lose sleep over the new images that would combine goatse.cx with their action figure.

      And who could blame them?

    17. Re:Geek Action Figures I'd Rather See by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 1

      Instead, I propose that we create a set of trading cards with a piece of bubble gum inside it. These would be something like the cards that suck.com made a few years ago, only with people that weren't all 15-minute famers.

      Umm.. yeah. I remember that I read that suck.com founder's book on day trading. Does it strike anyone as weird that this website is up, frozen like a time capsule at Dec 21, 2000? Who's still paying for the site hosting?

      -a

    18. Re:Geek Action Figures I'd Rather See by Hognoxious · · Score: 0
      How about one of Benoit Mandelbrot?
      Just one? Surely a set would be better - then there could be a Julia too.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  16. "ungodly" coding skills? by pedantic+bore · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Clearly the person who wrote this is not a genuine nerd -- only a nerd wannabe would make such a mistake, not knowing that to nerds the misuse of jargon is like waving a red flag in front of a bull.

    When they come out with one that has god-like coding skills, that's when I'll get interested. Maybe.

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    1. Re:"ungodly" coding skills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ungodly" doesn't seem out of place to me. Think about the phrase "he codes like he is possessed".

      See, during the dark ages the catholic church decided that the age of miracles was over and that anyting supernatural didn't come from god, and therefore must come from Satan. That is how they deduced that witches were evil.

      So "ungodly skill" can mean "supernatural skill".

    2. Re:"ungodly" coding skills? by pedantic+bore · · Score: 1
      Think about the phrase "he codes like he is possessed".



      Possessed by whom? Do you mean "he codes like he is Linda Blair in the Exorcist?" Do you really want that in the next cubicle?



      Let's take a poll: would you rather be described as ungodly, or god-like?

      --
      Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
  17. "Action" form? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Action?!?!?

    Pray tell, what action would be accurate? Sitting in a cube staring at a debugger?

    1. Re:"Action" form? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Since it's GeekMan, I doubt it comes with a patented Kung-Fu Action Grip. (Now that it's old news, I guess I should change my sig.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:"Action" form? by Richard_L_James · · Score: 1

      Remember Sid from Toy Story - I suspect they will see the kind of action!! I can't imagine any non-geeky 10 year old actually even thinking for a second of using such a weak looking figure to beat up action man or even Barbie for that matter! I feel sorry for these figures as I don't think many will meet normal ends either that or they will be purchased & mod'd by bored uni students to look more like their professors!

    3. Re:"Action" form? by cjellibebi · · Score: 1
      >Pray tell, what action would be accurate? Sitting in a cube staring at a debugger?

      In that case, instead of 'Action Man', the figure would be called "Passiveness Man".

      --
      Norway? More like Snoreway

  18. Hipster Geeks Bitching by dupper · · Score: 1

    About having good hygiene and sex appeal in 3... 2... 1...

    1. Re:Hipster Geeks Bitching by CavyDriver · · Score: 1

      No, most of us are out taking showers and having sex. So point in bitching about it.

    2. Re:Hipster Geeks Bitching by kunudo · · Score: 1

      He he he...

    3. Re:Hipster Geeks Bitching by tfbastard · · Score: 1

      I'd rather play with my ... Freud action figure than dignify that with a comment. Damn. Too late.

  19. Did poster RTFA? by Tandoori+Haggis · · Score: 1, Funny

    It says he's vulnerable to girls of the internet not repelled by them! Do I detect yet another case of one persons misinterpretation in order to justify their own leanings?

    For goodness sake! Some people!

    Theres always somebody who thinks techies getting root means something completely different.

    Sigh! What is the world coming to?

    As for the product in question, it is quite funny.

    --
    My hyperlinks aren't worth the paper they're printed on.
    1. Re:Did poster RTFA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theres always somebody who thinks techies getting root means something completely different.

      I'm sorry I have yet to see a website that offers

      1. Hot root action
      2. Root on root action
      3. These girls show their roots for you
      4. Root whores
      5. gay roots
      6. wet roots for you

  20. no stereotyping! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    opposite sex repulsion

    That's some savage stereotyping there. They made him as ugly as anything. Not all geeks are ugly. I am a geek, a girl geek and my list of superpowers does NOT include the ability to repel the opposite sex.

    If Barbie was real she would be over 6 feet tall, have feet too tiny to walk and boobs so big she would fall over. Geekman, despite the unfair stereotype, is at least normal looking. In fact, if Geekman were real I would marry him.

    1. Re:no stereotyping! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok, marry me -- geekman in spirit...

    2. Re:no stereotyping! by Ryan+Huddleston · · Score: 0

      He IS real...

      Marry Me :-P

    3. Re:no stereotyping! by Richard_L_James · · Score: 1

      Hmm... business opportunity for geekman realdolls?

    4. Re:no stereotyping! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barbie was real she would be over 6 feet tall, have feet too tiny to walk and boobs so big she would fall over

      There was a time period that I put nude barbies in Esties rockets and set them across the neighborhood. Will you marry me?

    5. Re:no stereotyping! by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I am a geek, a girl geek and my list of superpowers does NOT include the ability to repel the opposite sex.

      At least as girl you are automatically distanced from all the people here who make jokes about being [male] lonely little weaklings.

      I'm 6'1", weigh over 200lbs (not fat) and I ENJOY running and sports but I still have to put up with comments like the above. Every time I read another post here about "I'm a programmer so what do I know about hygiene/sex/popularity" it makes me want to reach through my monitor screen and down the internet, grab the guy by the throat and shake him.

      These people should get some pride! If someone isn't the most preposessing individual in the world it DOESN'T MATTER! It's not against the law, yet and you don't have to make excuses. But if you want to boast about it then fine, just don't pretend that it goes hand in hand with IT skills because there is no reason why it should.

      It is perfectly acceptable to be both mentally and physically fit. In fact, they complement each other.

      Okay, rant over. That just builds up every now and again and I need to bash some (very stupid) stereotypes.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    6. Re:no stereotyping! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You know what? I have mad game. But, I still make jokes about not being able to pick up chicks, because they can be amusing. The fact that comments such as you mention make you want to reach through the mirror says more about your insecurity than the true intent of their statements.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:no stereotyping! by Otter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      At least as girl you are automatically distanced from all the people here who make jokes about being [male] lonely little weaklings.

      As one of the people who makes those jokes, I am, in reality, a thin, fit (admittedly scrawny, despite lifting weights), married, hockey-playing, employed adult with passable social skills. I strongly suspect that a lot of others making similar remarks are also speaking with tongue in cheek.

    8. Re:no stereotyping! by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      says more about your insecurity than the true intent of their statements

      That's rich considering you don't know me. I personally think it says more about my boredom threshold. After wading through the same 'jokes' week after week, I have become very tired of them. In my experience they don't have a basis in reality.

      Oh well, I'm not going to get into an argument about it. Make whatever jokes you like. Currently, I lack the ability to reach through the internet and throttle people. ;)

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    9. Re:no stereotyping! by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Funny


      I strongly suspect that a lot of others making similar remarks are also speaking with tongue in cheek.

      You're probably right, after all - that was my point. Programmers et al are no different to the rest of the population in my experience as far as social skills, physique etc go. That's why I'm bored of the stereotype.

      Having said all that though, I switched to browsing at -1 and the OP already has three marriage proposals, so maybe we're both wrong. ;)

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    10. Re:no stereotyping! by Carewolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Neither the part about barbies feet or boobs are correct. She has very small feet and would likely have problems finding shoes (so much more time spend shoe shopping), but her breast are only slightly over average, you must have very small breast to not see that ;). Even women with breasts 5-10 times larger do not have problems with balance, although they often develop backpains in their 40's.

      And yes the stereotyping is bad. I pretty much live up to every geek stereotype, but even I can find a girls. I used to think I couldn't (reflecting social trends?), but once I actually _tried_ it became a lot easier.

    11. Re:no stereotyping! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Original poster here.
      Those things I said about Barbie is relative to her proportion. The average woman is a 34"/37"/40" or approximate. Barbie would be 39"/19"/33" which is ridiculously wrong.

      And what the hell, I'll marry you all.
      ...on second thoughts, western society looks down upon polygamy and as Geekman conforms to the stereotype, I will too. : )

    12. Re:no stereotyping! by Mornelithe · · Score: 1

      If your boredom threshold is that low, I find it surprising that you can read Slapdash at all.

      Most of the stuff posted on Slashdot is all the same stuff rehashed over and over. Geek stereotype jokes aren't even the worst of it. At least I can get a chuckle out of some of those.

      However, I've never laughed at a "3. profit" joke here, and there's at least 2 of those visible at +3 on every damn story. I don't see nearly as many geek stereotype jokes.

      Even if you browse at +5 and accept only +I comments, you still get largely stuff that's just obvious or communally accepted vomited out over and over (for example, in a Pixar story about graphics, there will be 10 +5 posts saying "Hey, they write good stories too!").

      If you have urges to smack people for repeating the same stuff over and over again on Slashdot, you should probably stop reading it, because that's like 80% of the content.

      --

      I've come for the woman, and your head.

    13. Re:no stereotyping! by ky11x · · Score: 1

      If Barbie was real she would be over 6 feet tall

      I'm curious as to how you got this figure. It isn't as if the Barbie accessories are really made to scale (if they were she'd be more like 10 feet tall or even taller). Thoughts?

    14. Re:no stereotyping! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Different sources say different things.

      Google it.

      ...yeah its weird. : )

    15. Re:no stereotyping! by BillX · · Score: 1

      I switched to browsing at -1 and the OP already has three marriage proposals,

      Those bastards! Beating me to it, and such. Well, better make it 4...

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    16. Re:no stereotyping! by jlipkin · · Score: 1

      What about a geek woman doll? I have two daughters, what are they supposed to look to for inspiration?

    17. Re:no stereotyping! by GaryOlson · · Score: 1
      For those of us geeks with abundant natural resources, we should allow GeekMan his stereotypical powers.

      Previously, I was in metals manufacturing; now I am admin for a Computer Science department. At 6'4", 245lbs, 18" neck, strong back, and with massive arms and shoulders, I use my imposing physical presence with ardent fervor. When I ask, EVERYONE gives me the root password to their favorite personal research box. Only one PhD student had the pomposity to keep telling me I had to recognize zones on his DNS server....when I said NO the 3rd time I used non-technical arguments! GeekMan lacks a superpower to dominate the arrongance of the PhD student.

      After I move a Sun 21" monitor across the room in one swift motion, even GeekMan will pause in his tracks. I have single-handedly rackmounted a Sun V880 server; GeekMan can't code without a hardware base. Rackmount the APC UPS with batteries still installed -- No Problem.

      Leave GeekMan his sterotypical powers, I still win.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    18. Re:no stereotyping! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not all geeks are ugly. I am a geek, a girl geek and my list of superpowers does NOT include the ability to repel the opposite sex.

      I'm a male geek. I'm told I'm attractive. My list definitely does include the ability to repel the opposite sex. But it takes time for them to be completely repelled. :/

    19. Re:no stereotyping! by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      At 6'4", 245lbs, 18" neck, strong back, and with massive arms and shoulders, I use my imposing physical presence with ardent fervor.

      Okay - you win the non-stereotypical geek award. That beats me.

      Now to shatter the last remaining stereotype and complete the set... Are you a girl?

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    20. Re:no stereotyping! by jared42 · · Score: 1

      h4rm0ny wrote...

      If someone isn't the most preposessing individual in the world...

      I am ashamed to admit, but I read that as `the most preprocessing individual in the world...' I need to stop looking at poorly-written C code and start looking at anything in the Real World(tm).

      Wow... amazing framerate...

  21. Not really a geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    He's a nerd, not a geek.

  22. Fake stereo type geek by 1nhuman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bleeeeh. Stupid ninties tv show geek.

    What geek nowadays uses pens? A modern geek would have an USB stick and/or other memory thingies sticking out of his breast pocket. And he/she would at least wear one Bluetooth headset and contact lenses instead of these Clark Kent glasses.

    --
    The glass is half-full. With poison. And there are cracks in the glass. The dirty, dirty glass.
    1. Re:Fake stereo type geek by foxtrot · · Score: 1

      What geek nowadays uses pens?

      Uh, I do.

      You know. "right tool for the job." This ain't Star Trek, and I ain't leaving my PDA on someone else's desk with a quick-and-dirty diagram on it. I'm not even willing to leave a USB stick or CF card on your desk.

      On the other hand, I don't carry pens in my shirt pocket, either. They go in my belt pouch with the Leatherman Wave, Mag-Lite, and hands-free unit for my cellphone...

    2. Re:Fake stereo type geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because that belt pouch is far less gay (err, geeky), than keeping the pen in your pocket.

    3. Re:Fake stereo type geek by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Bleeeeh. Stupid ninties tv show geek.

      What geek nowadays uses pens? A modern geek would have an USB stick and/or other memory thingies sticking out of his breast pocket. And he/she would at least wear one Bluetooth headset and contact lenses instead of these Clark Kent glasses.


      Exactly, that geek is completely obselete!

      --
      I stole this Sig
    4. Re:Fake stereo type geek by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      contact lenses instead of these Clark Kent glasses

      Hey now, I wear glasses you insensitive clod. I like contact lenses when being physicaly active, but for the most part, it's glasses. I go through alot of bother and effort to get glass glasses, rather then those damn plastic ones that costco will only carry. If I hum just right I can detect frequencies above 60hz. Very handy. I just wish Costco would carry more circular lenses, rather then those damn oval / retangular ones. I can't see my keyboard when I look at the screen.

      Even if you like to wear contacts and you have bad non-corrected vision, you're wise to have a pair of glasses somewhere handy.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    5. Re:Fake stereo type geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, there is a geek stereotype that pisses me off and it comes from the mouth of Tom Leykis.

      He frequently repeats the comment that geeks can't and don't get laid. Specifically, IT guys. Why? Because women are mostly interested in money and the more money a guy has, the hotter chick he can get, regardless of his appearance or suaveness. If you have six figures, he believes you can probably get an 8 or a 9 and possibly even a 10.

      My problem with that stereotype is that most of the IT guys and technical geeks that I know (including myself) earn near or more than $100k... So his suggestion that technical guys can't get tail is a circular and false assertion.

      Mind you, I *DO* like Tom Leykis. I just dislike that one viewpoint of his.

    6. Re:Fake stereo type geek by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Why? Because women are mostly interested in money.......My problem with that stereotype is that most of the IT guys and technical geeks that I know (including myself) earn near or more than $100k...

      The Indian Geek with Super Offshoring Grip action figure will fix that.

      BTW, I think what Tom meant is that geeks don't LOOK wealthy. You cannot tell a poor geek from a rich geek, at least the babes can't.

    7. Re:Fake stereo type geek by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      Granted. But pencils are better than pens.

      1) Erasable.
      2) Full grayscale instead of monocrome.
      3) Will not leak or explode, so you don't NEED a pocket protector.
      4) Slightly cheaper.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    8. Re:Fake stereo type geek by shiny+pink+things · · Score: 1

      He frequently repeats the comment that geeks can't and don't get laid. Specifically, IT guys. Why? Because women are mostly interested in money...

      You do realize that this is much more harmful sterotype of women than it is of geeks, don't you?

      Sexism, not "geekiness", is the main thing standing between "the average technical geek" and a girlfriend.

    9. Re:Fake stereo type geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contact lenses? AHAHAH...the last thing I want on my eye balls is a foreign object.

  23. let me guess... by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 3, Funny

    now of available on thinkgeek?

  24. This could be good by WillWare · · Score: 4, Funny

    Come on, Torvalds and McBride action figures? Does anybody not want these? Maybe a Stallman action figure to muddy the waters with periodic confusing rants.

    --
    WWJD for a Klondike Bar?
    1. Re:This could be good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want a John Catz Action Figure(tm).

    2. Re:This could be good by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      I'd buy them in a heart beat. Where's ThinkGeek with the products people really want?

      --
      Why not fork?
    3. Re:This could be good by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that RMS should sue George Lucas for the characterization of Yoda? Confusing, oddly-spoken hero longing for the "good ol' days"?

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  25. I'd be offended... by X-Nc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but I'm to lazy to do anything about it. The "opposite sex repulsion" I can deal with but the "less than ideal personal hygiene routine" is just insulting. In 22 years I haven't met a techie/geek who's personal hygiene was questionable. Dubious interpersonal communications skills, yes (it can be hard to interface with the humans). An over abundance of pompousness, sure. But we don't stink.

    --
    --
    If I actually could spell I'd have spelled it right in the first place.
    1. Re:I'd be offended... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A good indicator that you have not met RMS in person. Or, worse still, you can no longer tell RMS stinks....

    2. Re:I'd be offended... by geeber · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Then you have clearly never been to a university computer center. The funk in some of those can make your eyes water. Most geeks may not stink, but it only takes a few...

    3. Re:I'd be offended... by benspionage · · Score: 1

      We must live in different universes then!

      What was your sample size? One?

    4. Re:I'd be offended... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I vehemently disagree. It's not that the majority of them stink, it's that basically every institution with a significant number of technical people has someone who stinks. A lot. I was the worst stinker once :( I was just departing teenagerhood and my feet decided they just had to generate the foulest stench ever, they still don't exactly smell like roses. Luckily I was working for Cisco in Santa Cruz at the time and they still had a more or less TGV-influenced culture, so I was able to get away with being barefoot most all the time. It's a liability nightmare for a company I'm sure, but I managed to carry it off anyway and it took care of the foot odor issue.

      I had a coworker once who was so casual about his hygiene habits that you more or less had to tell him there was something in his beard every time you saw him - but he was sharp as a tack and a strong asset to the team.

      I also had an indian coworker who wouldn't bathe and wore some nauseatingly cloying perfume to cover it up (HINT: BO + perfume = stinky perfume) but that's just religiousgeek crossover. I wouldn't say he was much of a geek anyway, because by all accounts his code was craptacular.

      Anyway speaking of crossover, there's a lot of crossover between the D&D crowd which has also been mocked for its less sanitary members many a time, and that's because those people exist - many of them ended up working in a computer department where their odor would be less of an issue, because they're far behind closed doors.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:I'd be offended... by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      ...every institution with a significant number of technical people has someone who stinks. A lot.

      And this is why Extreme Programming (XP) doesn't work!

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    6. Re:I'd be offended... by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      (HINT: BO + perfume = stinky perfume)

      That reminds me of the circa-80s Lysol(?) commercial, where the parent uses the competition's spray in the kitchen, and the little girl wails, "Now it smells like fish and lemons!"

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    7. Re:I'd be offended... by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 1

      (it can be hard to interface with the humans)

      Well when you put it that way no one geeks have a hard time socializing.

      --

      ----
      Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    8. Re:I'd be offended... by ajna · · Score: 1

      geeks with poor hygiene definitely exist. in several higher cs and math classes i've run across classmates that had a level of stink and hair-mattedness suggesting lengthy (read: much more than a day, perhaps a week!) intervals between bathing...

    9. Re:I'd be offended... by Jester99 · · Score: 1

      ...But we don't stink.

      Honest to God quote from a classmate of mine:

      "Yeah, it's pretty sad when you have to stay up coding for so long that you don't even have time to shower."

      My friends and I just sort of blinked and walked slowly backwards and away.

      Seriously. If you go to the ECE lab at my Uni, you can tell how close it is to a major deadline when the place begins to get realllllllllllly funky smelling.

    10. Re:I'd be offended... by X-Nc · · Score: 1

      It's true, I have never been to a university computer center. I didn't really spend much time in university at all, for that matter. Maybe my statement on funkyness should have been limited primarily to commercial sites. Or even more specifically Millitary sites, as that is where I have been since I was 19.

      --
      --
      If I actually could spell I'd have spelled it right in the first place.
  26. What a fake by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Informative
    Site doesn't even load properly in opera. Ungodly HTML skills no doubt.

    He seems more the old nerd/geek as shown in jock movies. Not the nerd/geek as they are in real life but rather as tv would like to show them.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:What a fake by Piquan · · Score: 1

      Not the nerd/geek as they are in real life but rather as tv would like to show them.

      Quite a statement, coming from you.

  27. Sorry by jb.hl.com · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry if this sounds a little off, but don't you think it's better to have less negative stereotypes circulating around about geeks?

    I'm sick of technical types being portrayed as losers. It's just not funny any more.

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    1. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry if this sounds a little off, but don't you think it's better to have less negative stereotypes circulating around about geeks?

      I'm sick of technical types being portrayed as losers. It's just not funny any more.


      And yet you're posting this on Slashdot of all places...

    2. Re:Sorry by Servo · · Score: 1

      Slashdot who continues to propogate the "revenge of the nerd" stereotype.

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
    3. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that...

      I keep my choice of women happy...
      I take a shower every day...
      I can code circles around 90% of you (OK, I might have an ego) ... Yes I've seen your code.
      I can design and deliver any hardware you need (for the right price)

      I am not a geeky freak. I'm a cowboy baby...

      So take your doll and shove it up your ass.

      "And I'm a Kid Rock it up and down your block
      With a bottle of scotch and watch lots of crotch
      Buy yacht with a flag sayin' chillin' the most
      Then rock that bitch up and down the coast"

  28. WARNING!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do not buy a Geekman!!

    Since receiving mine for Xmas, I've had nothing but trouble with him!!!

    In January, I got a subpoena from the RIAA, saying I was sharing music online (bunk,.. it was Geekman!)

    In February, he got sued by SCO for infringing o some kind of pocket pencil holder device!!

    In March, he locked himself in my office for a week and a half,... and took my Xbox in there with him!

    In April, my family woke up to find all our network logon passwords changed, and we couldn't get online for days.

    And, so far, in May, my coffee bill has tripled!!!

    This Geekman is nothing but trouble,.. don't buy one!

    1. Re:WARNING!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next month he is going to reprieve you of your girlfriends!

  29. power quibble by moviepig.com · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'm not sure anyone (of any disposition whatsoever) considers "opposite sex repulsion" a super-power ...

    ... and "less-than-ideal personal hygiene" is at best a super-convenience.

    (... or so I'm told ...)

    --
    Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly
    1. Re:power quibble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure anyone (of any disposition whatsoever) considers "opposite sex repulsion" a super-power

      There are times when it would be a very useful power... namely on New Years Eve when drunk ugly old women are going around trying to kiss everyone.

  30. Not a UNIX geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's clearly not a UNIX geek. He's missing the requisite long scraggly beard.

  31. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does it fart in Root Mean Squared?

  32. Happy worker, or happy troll? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

    Hey, you can upload pictures to that site! Upload link

  33. you have not by NumbThumb · · Score: 1

    been here for long, have you?

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this 120 chars is too small to contain.
  34. Lewis Skolnick??? by ErnstKompressor · · Score: 1

    Now that would be a cool 'Inaction Figure'...

    BTW, I thought nerds/geeks were actually really proficient with the opposite sex, just a little slower to 'interface hardware and software'...

    --
    We apologise for the fault in this post. Those responsible have been sacked. -- Signed RICHARD M. NIXON
  35. Filthy Geeks Available in Action Figure Porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Filthy Geeks Available in Action Figure Porn"

    Maybe its my cutting back on caffine but thats what I first read. Oh dear.

  36. wtf? by brad3378 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't know whether to be flattered or offended. This thing looks just like me except for the glasses.

    --

    1. Re:wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your skin looks like plastic, you might want to see a doctor.

  37. GeekMan in Action! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    .

  38. Who will buy it by proudlyindian · · Score: 0

    Really who will buy this toy ... will he be defined as a "geek" after he buys this toy ?

    Striving to be common ...

  39. Am I the only one who noticed? by Kevin+Burtch · · Score: 1


    I can't be the only one who noticed that the people selling this don't even know what a notebook computer is... they actually have it propped on his lap with the hinge VERTICAL! (like a book)

    --
    - Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -
    1. Re:Am I the only one who noticed? by 3th3rn3t · · Score: 1

      hey, the do know what it is, see, he's rests his coffee mug on it

    2. Re:Am I the only one who noticed? by Kevin+Burtch · · Score: 1


      Yeah, I think I'm the one who needs coffee (too bad I hate the taste)...
      My dim monitor provided a cool optical illusion, apparently. ;)

      --
      - Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -
    3. Re:Am I the only one who noticed? by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Either you posted the wrong link, or don't know what "vertical" means or haven't read a book recently or something. Maybe you just need glasses?

      Your link clearly shows his right hand near the (correctly) upright screen, and his left holding a coffee cup near the keyboard, which is correctly sitting on his lap. The data ports on that laptop are on the hinge, which goes from one knee to another as it would during normal usage.

  40. It's not GeekMan... It's NerdMan... by Minkey+Brines · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Nerd: Too smart for this planet. Too smart to know it. His/her intelligence interferes with normal daily activities (social relations, sex, walking and chewing gum at the sametime). Seeks perfect solutions to all (interesting or not interesting) problems. Related terms: Propeller-head, Freaking Nerd

    Geek (Originally referred to the lowly circus performer who bit the heads off of small animals for the shock value to the audience): Anyone overly enthusiastic about ANY one area (i.e. music geek, astronomy geek, computer geek). Usually extremely technically skilled. Usually extremely clever, seeking out clever solutions to interesting problems (i.e. Hacks). Usually extremely intelligent. Driven by their passion for the subject to the point of obsession. Related terms: Uber-geek, Alpha-geek

  41. Communication Skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The communication skills of engineers never cease to amaze me. They tackle complex issues unambiguously and unhindered by gender, race/culture, and even very strong accents. They evaluate ideas without judging the people behind them and they almost never take anything personally. They tackle complex systems involving many people at all levels. They also have an intuitive understanding of how to communicate what they need to to both techs and managers, understanding the differences in perception and priority of both these groups.

    Yet time and time again, there is this stereotype the Engineers don't know how to communicate, or don't know how to communicate with others. That is not how modern engineering works. Teamwork is a constant everyday activity for engineers much more so than artists, architects, and most laborers.

    Mike

    1. Re:Communication Skills by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, you should be in management.

    2. Re:Communication Skills by tfbastard · · Score: 0

      Engineer-hugging doesn't seem to be compatible with higher-ranking management positions, for some reason.

    3. Re:Communication Skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are engineers, and there are geeks. not mutually exclusive, but separate things.

  42. Doll Accessories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm only interested in cmdrTaco doll if it comes with a tiny 17' Powerbook...

  43. as daat nët eise Metzleschjong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    As daat nët eise Metzleschjong op där Photo?

    Mol éng Kéier wou Lëtzebuerg eppes maache kann (t'fehlen jhust zwou Stëmmen fier d'SoftwarePatenter ze blocken... souvill Stëmmen wéi Lëtzebuerg huet...) an dann verpenne mer et och nach!

  44. If this trend continues.... by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...a Goatse doll is just around the corner.

    1. Re:If this trend continues.... by Rinikusu · · Score: 5, Funny

      Jesus.. There's should be a fucking "Horrifying" moderation option.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    2. Re:If this trend continues.... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I take it you don't want the accessories package either?

  45. And... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Geek-Mans secret love can be found here.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  46. Agreed by Infonaut · · Score: 1
    I'm sick of technical types being portrayed as losers. It's just not funny any more.

    It's not enough that popular culture bashes geeks, but to have geeks wholeheartedly embrace the stereotype is just plain perverse.

    Shouldn't we embrace the notion that geeks come in both genders, all sizes, and with a wide range of characteristics, hobbies, and non-geek pursuits?

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  47. So make Barbie six feet tall, damnit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If Barbie was real she would be over 6 feet tall, have feet too tiny to walk and boobs so big she would fall over.

    What's the problem here? Please, make Barbie six feet tall!

  48. Why Get this Doll? by Laebshade · · Score: 1

    When I can get a happy-time harry doll?

  49. This might shock you by bigberk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You might mod me as troll for this, but I swear to god this is true. Sometimes fact is weirder than fiction; and if you can't accept this, then your loss, I guarantee you.

    Back when I was in high school, there was this devilishly attractive girl, real cute, that never seemed to end up dating anyone. I always wondered about that... now she's gone to Hollywood, by the way.

    A few years later, a close mutual friend revealed to me Jessica's big secret: she had an intense nerd fetish. In fact, all those high school years apparently she had been swooning over Tyler, the nerdiest dweeb in school. Tyler once tripped and fell down a freakin' hill while chasing after the school bus. And his voice was really, really funny.

    OK, so here's my point: some (really hot) girls love nerds. Even the seriously nerdiest guys could pick up hot chicks. Weird huh? An action figure like this could actually turn on some ladies.

    1. Re:This might shock you by kwoff · · Score: 1

      she had an intense nerd fetish. In fact, all those high school years apparently she had been swooning over Tyler, the nerdiest dweeb in school. Tyler once tripped and fell down a freakin' hill while chasing after the school bus. And his voice was really, really funny.

      OK, so here's my point: some (really hot) girls love nerds. Even the seriously nerdiest guys could pick up hot chicks. Weird huh? An action figure like this could actually turn on some ladies.

      Uh, I think that's a different fetish.
  50. Ungodly coding abilities, eh? by 6Yankee · · Score: 3, Funny

    http://www.happyworker.com/geekman/geekdom/ - An error occurred on the server when processing the URL. Please contact the system administrator.

    Stop posing about like a superhero and fix your damn site, Geekman!!!

  51. I've met quite a few by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm 35 now, and I've met quite a few stinky geeks. Some were go bad you didn't even want to enter their office.

    It may not be true of all geeks, but there are some out there.

  52. Awesome COH Char by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Been having problems coming up with a unique hero for my City of Heroes account, and someone just posts it to Slashdot. YES!

    1. Re:Awesome COH Char by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, Superhero GeekMan set up.

      "Sitting in front of his Computer, unaware of the dangerous radiation leaking from the faulty monitor in front of him, Jerry Howswitz mutates
      into GeekMan!"

      Need a BattleCry though.

      Any suggestions.

  53. If Saatchi & Saatchi sold them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'd call them INaction figures.

    Clearly, geeks just don't know how to sell themselves...

  54. Thats no geek! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats a NERD!

  55. Glasses from *where*? by don.g · · Score: 1

    ...you can buy *glasses* from what sounds like some sort of discount department store? How does this work? Please elaborate.

    --
    Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
    1. Re:Glasses from *where*? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Just an optometrist has a small shop at Costco, nothing fancy, 4 chair waiting room, small staff of 2-3 people at a time. They also have frames and you can order lenses for frames, the lenses are outsoursed to amother company. Turn around 1 day minium, 3-5 days typical.

      1. Optometrist $50-$75 fee depending on contacts or not.
      2. Frames, $50-$100 typical, some last years models discounted. I'd say $25 minium
      3. Lenses $25-$50 typical. They don't offer tempered glass as i'm sure I said. Photogreys yes, but I find them too fragile.

      Reasons why I choose to get my glasses there. Both times i've been really close to 20/20. I got frustrated with other Optometrist shops fitting me with contacts that were just too damn small, or being lazy and filling my prescription the same for both eyes. I got annoyed sitting through marketing videos on the latest and greatest inovation when all I want was some traditional glass lenses. And most importantly a simple fixed pricing structure. The most frustrating thing is shopping for glasses and getting complex answers about how much something costs. It's nice to know that for $150 I can get glasses, or $100 if I pick last year's model.

      Idealy... I should hit the web and actually find the design I like and get a few of them. Nothing more annoying then having to adjust to a diffrent style of *fish bowl world*.

      I'm zakezuke, and i'm a geek.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  56. Will you marry me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a 350lbs fat guy with bad personal hygiene and no social skills. I am very repulsive to the opposite sex, but you sound attractive and you are not of the opposite sex, so perhaps you will take me. Please, please, please? I'm really smart, but I just can't get any love.

  57. Been done before... by squidinkcalligraphy · · Score: 1

    Anthony Giddens and Michel Foucault action figures
    Quote:
    Keenly aware of the fluidity of social identities, this 6.5" Michel Foucault waves his baton in poststructuralist style at all challenges. Shrouded in a special removeable French cloak and with a built-in thoughtful head movement, this superb action figure is essential for both professional philosophers and junior postmodernists.

    --
    "I think it would be a good idea" Gandhi, on Western Civilisation
  58. I must NOT be a geek since... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I'm not a white male!

    Think about it for a minute before you relgate this to "Troll". Perception is one of the biggest barriers to advancement of minorities. What's the stereotype for Asians? Now think about the stereotypes for Blacks. This affects not only society as a whole, but the individual as well.

    According to experiments done by Steele & Ambady, 2003, asian women do better on math tests if they are reminded of the Asian stereotype versus another pool of asian women who are not reminded.

    Perception is the Biggest Barrier

    1. Re:I must NOT be a geek since... by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      What's the stereotype for Asians?

      They have either blue or green hair, disturbingly large eyes, dynamically variable mouth size, and they spend most of their time piloting giant robots.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  59. Already got them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bah Inspector Gadget and Lex Luthor cleaned up the market years ago.