Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft, Sony Announce iPod Competitors

Pfhreak writes "According to the Denver Post -- Las Vegas section, a little over halfway down the page -- Microsoft will begin selling a $50 music player that will 'look and feel as good as the iPod' later this year. Yusuf Mehdi, a Microsoft VP, is quoted as saying that the player will give customers more choices than Apple." In related news, Tetsugaku-San writes "The Register has the scoop on Sony's new portable audio/visual playback device. Impressively it plays MPEG2, MPEG4, BMP, GIF, PNG, TIFF and MP3 (finally they got the message Apple was gonna whoop em!) straight out of the box. Not as good battery life as I'd like to see, but real world tests remain to be seen."

59 of 610 comments (clear)

  1. Is there any way by BizidyDizidy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    this is going to have a similar capacity? If so, IPOD should be out of business with that price difference.

    --
    The safest way to approach lava is to have another person with you and he goes first.
    1. Re:Is there any way by hondo77 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course it's not going to have a similar capacity. All he said was it's going to look neat. More Microsoft FUD and vapor.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    2. Re:Is there any way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "this is going to have a similar capacity? If so, IPOD should be out of business with that price difference."

      Wow, I don't think anyone could come up with a more succinct statement that summarizes why the Slashdot crowd has absolutely no clue about the portable music player market.

    3. Re:Is there any way by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Its cracks me up that what they're aiming for is to "...look and feel like the IPOD."

      Whatever happened to outdoing your competitors?

      Way to go MS. Aim low.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    4. Re:Is there any way by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Whatever happened to outdoing your competitors?

      Way to go MS. Aim low."


      Oh right. Here's what the reverse would be:

      "Um, M$, this is nothing like the elegance of the iPod. Way to go MS, blow it again."

    5. Re:Is there any way by dtfarmer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I don't think it will have a similar capacity. I wouldn't even bet on it being a microsoft product, as that last bastion of journalistic integrity, as the apple turns has a linked story that has a bit more to chew on (but not much more) than the denver post article.

      The quote about the $50 players was left out, but it does still contain the 'look and feel' quote, and he is obviously referring to third-party players that will be launched alongside a new microsoft music download service.

      What kind of hard drive could a manufacturer possibly put in a player for less than $50 - none, maybe flash 128/256 - but that's already on the market, and has been for some time. Anyway, I choose to believe this to be just more Microsoft FUD until I see such a $50 iPod killer.

    6. Re:Is there any way by Drawkcab · · Score: 5, Informative

      Have you ever priced buying one of the little drives in an ipod or ipod mini individually? The primary reason that competitors can claim similar features cheaper is that their players are a bit larger, thus able to use cheaper hard drives. The smaller form factor of the ipod and the hard drive inside does add value. If you don't value the slightly smaller size, thats a perfectly valid opinion, but some people do value it, and the smaller drives are legitimately more expensive than larger ones with the same capacity.

      Most of Apples competitors have only been able to compete in form OR function OR price, or 2 of those factors, never all 3. That indicates that the iPods aren't as inflated in price as you think, or with all the competition out there, they wouldn't be so hard to improve on. Apple does have a higher markup than some companies, but if they knocked $100 off the entry level iPod, I doubt they'd be making any net profit, and they are not a charity. The markup is not that dramatic.

    7. Re:Is there any way by Bricklets · · Score: 3, Informative

      No one will argue that iPods aren't expensive, but to say they are overpriced is certainly up for debate. In fact, I remember an old slashdot story talking about this very issue and pointed to an article on arstechnica. Found the article here.

      --
      Little Bricklets
    8. Re:Is there any way by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "Um, M$, this is nothing like the elegance of the iPod. Way to go MS, blow it again."

      Thats just it, it doesn't have to be anything like iPod. As a geek (normal ppl will no doubt disagree) I want something functional. Something that works and does everything its supposed to do with no extraneous BS.

      Barring that I would settle for something elegant. Elegant does not have to mean "...look and feel like the iPod". Why is it that Apple, a company of relatively small size and resources can make computers and electronics more aesthetically pleasing than atlest half the women I've dated and M$ can only put out bloated, overpriced crap. Look at the XBox.

      The money that M$ is losing on this MP3 player project could be invested in market research and finding the next User Interface design geniuses that will put out something that'll make every M$ bashing geek on /. cream in his pants. Instead they'd rather put out cheap crap and spread all kinds of FUD just to kill off a competitor.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    9. Re:Is there any way by stephentyrone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They clearly aren't overpriced; they sell like hotcakes. Apple has accurately judged the market's demand for the devices, and chosen the appropriate price point. If they actually *were* overpriced, a competitor would have long since come along and undercut them. There are cheaper players, yes, but none as small and/or well executed as the iPod (mini). What apple "should" be charging is what the market will support, looking also to make it difficult for a competitor to beat them on the combination of price/form/function. They've clearly hit the mark, as demand shows. I don't know, maybe you mean "should" in some weird moral sense? I mean, they "should" just give me one, in my ideal universe, but it ain't gonna happen. Other companies have been in the fray for quite some time, and they haven't forced down apple's prices yet; this is a good indication that they're right where they "should" be.

    10. Re:Is there any way by Babbster · · Score: 4, Insightful
      ...M$ can only put out bloated, overpriced crap. Look at the XBox.

      I know it's flamebait (using the dollar sign tipped me off) but I can't help myself. The Xbox is indeed bloated (in terms of size) but it is neither "overpriced" nor "crap." In fact, it offers more functionality (by nearly every measure) than Sony's PS2 for the same price. There are great games to play on the system, and cross-platform games usually look, and sometimes play, better than on competing machines.

      Whatever the truth is about Microsoft's potential MP3 player (and we don't have "truth" yet since the linked article is a blurb that generates more questions than answers), there's nothing wrong with the Xbox that a table (and, for some people, a few Japanese-style RPGs) won't fix.

    11. Re:Is there any way by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Microsoft doesn't aim 'high' or 'low.' Microsoft aims wide.

      Nobody uses Microsoft products has ever been called elitist. MS isn't into selling to narrow niche markets.

      --
      resigned
    12. Re:Is there any way by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Feel free to prove to me that I'm talking out of my ass.
      You ask, I deliver.

      Firstly, In terms of sales, Xbox is second. Gamecube is third. PS2 is first, and not surprisingly, as they had a two year head start on the pair.

      Secondly, in terms of capability, Xbox is the winner, hands down. It's simply a more powerful machine than the PS2, with better graphics, an internal hard-drive, an internal network adapter, 4 controler slots compared to PS2's 2, has the ability to rip your own music to the hard drive, et cetera, et al, ad infinitum. Again, not surprising, as the PS2 is a two year older design, and Gamecube went the budget route.

      Thirdly, the reason you've only heard Halo included with 'good game' and 'Xbox' was because you're not a console gamer. Otherwise you'd have heard Splinter Cell, Splinter Cell: Pandora Tomorrow, Knights of the Old Republic, Crimson Skies, as well as plenty of cross-platform games like Prince of Persia: Sands of Time and Grand Theft Auto 3/Vice City (The last three all have better graphics on the Xbox than the PS2 counterpart).

      So yes. You're talking out of your ass.
      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    13. Re:Is there any way by Dachannien · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you've ever spent hours on end staring at and fondling your iPod, then the Microsoft audio alternative is for you!

      Dunno what you're gonna do if you actually want to *listen* to the damn thing....

    14. Re:Is there any way by obeythefist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What part of "embrace and extend" are we not clear on?

      Phase 1: Embrace - Get your foot into the market, as deep as you can. Doesn't have to "outdo" the competitors. You can even sell at a loss if you like, the OS market will pay for it. Make your web browser "free". Sell your XBox/MS-IPod at a lower price than it costs you to make.
      Phase 2: Extend - Use market penetration, leverage, hostile takeovers, anticompetetive practice and "innovation" to make that market yours.
      Phase 3: Profit
      Phase 4: Find new market. Repeat step 1.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
  2. No .ogg, no sale. by Agent+Green · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's just the way it is. I want my open-source, patent-free, DRM-free codec.

    --
    // Agent Green (Ian / IU7 / KB1JQO)
    // IEEE 802.3: All 10base Are Belong To Us
    1. Re:No .ogg, no sale. by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 4, Informative

      "That's just the way it is. I want my open-source, patent-free, DRM-free codec."

      Instead of bitching about the lack of OGG support on Slashdot where it won't help matters, why don't you email Apple and tell them that you would be an iPod if they'd ship with OGG support? That would be the more constructive argument to make. Here, I'll even help you out and provide the proper link to submit your comment:

      http://www.apple.com/feedback/ipod.html

      Happy codec hunting!

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    2. Re:No .ogg, no sale. by janbjurstrom · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Or even better, be active: Hop over to iPod Linux and join the hackers there - for OGG support (& more!) on the iPod. 'Tis beautiful, this open-source thing of ours *sniff*.

      --
      668.5
    3. Re:No .ogg, no sale. by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Operator: And our next question we'll take is from Arik Hesseldahl with Forbes.com.

      Arik Hesseldahl: Hi, Steve. Always concerned about -- not concerned, I guess, but wondering -- one of the previous questions was about revenue. I'm wondering if iTunes has reached the break even point yet.

      Steve Jobs: Yes. The iTunes music store had a small profit this past quarter.

      Arik Hesseldahl: Had a small profit. OK. Any interest whatsoever, since in the open source OGG Vorbis format?

      Steve Jobs: We're certainly not getting any requests from customers for it.

      Arik Hesseldahl: OK.

      Source: Conference call, April 29, 2004.

  3. Competition? by SubTexel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Finally some competition in Apples handheld audio monopoly? Good to see the underdog(s) stick it to 'em.

    1. Re:Competition? by jhunsake · · Score: 3, Funny

      Uh yeah, you just made the same joke. Dumbass.

    2. Re:Competition? by N1KO · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh! A sarcasm detector! That's really useful!

  4. funny you should mention that by switcha · · Score: 5, Funny
    Microsoft will begin selling a $50 music player that will 'look and feel as good as the iPod' later this year.

    What a coincidence. Apple's lawyers are already filling out a lawsuit with the very same title!

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  5. Prediction ... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Sony device will be quite good, and will compare favorably to the iPod. The Microsoft device will be a POS, but will sell like hotcakes despite that, and in a few years we'll have fanboys and pundits gushing about how Bill Gates "innovated" the personal MP3 player.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    1. Re:Prediction ... by jrockway · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There weren't really and HD-based MP3 players before the iPod. So the "Mac Zealots" are pretty close to the truth anyway. But BTW, I didn't see any zealots saying anything about this. You are putting words in their collective mouth.

      Anyway, I think it's great that microsoft wants to sell me $200 hard drives for $50 in a nice shinny box. Me buying a new mini hard drive == M$ losing $150. What a deal :)

      --
      My other car is first.
    2. Re:Prediction ... by cens0r · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nomad Jukebox... archos... both were out long before the ipod.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    3. Re:Prediction ... by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ...the personal MP3 player

      You're assuming it will even play MP3s.

      If they are pricing it at $50, they have to somehow make a profit on the songs; ie: at this price, I'd imagine they'd force everyone to use their online music store to buy music---and the player won't play anything else.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

  6. Realistically by prostoalex · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, was bound to happen some day. Hard drive is probably the most expensive part of the hardware, and one can assume Microsoft already has software development covered.

    However, even Dell's digital jukeboxes start at $200, and beating Dell pricewise is something out of ordinary (possible, but few have done it).

    1. Re:Realistically by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not to mention really ugly and hard to use. What a bargain.

      --

      I write in my journal
  7. Typical by BWJones · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In order to let folks know just how cool Microsoft is, they always seem to pre-announce products by several months to years and invariably when they come out, they always seem to be somehow less than they promised. The iPod is good.....damned good. So I am certainly going to take a wait and see approach, but one usually gets what they pay for.

    I likely will be sticking with the iPod I suspect.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
  8. Price is too low? by Sean80 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    How can they possibly sustain a business selling a player for $50? Oh, I remember, kill the competition with your low-priced alternative, because your Windows and Office products are such cashcows, and then when everybody else is laid waste, jack up the price and add useless features for years and years to come. Oh, and by the way, you need Windows to download the music for your player. Funny that.

    Not trying to flamebait or anything, but haven't we seen this type of strategy before?

    Dejavu is such a wonderful thing.

  9. look and feel? by pedantic+bore · · Score: 4, Insightful
    'look and feel as good as the iPod'

    Look and feel are cheap. The question is whether it will work and sound as good. The principal attraction of the iPod is that it's intuitive and meshes well with iTunes. That's worth money to users.

    I'm glad that iPod is getting some competition (it will make iPods better to) but I don't see that this is necessarily a death blow for them.

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    1. Re:look and feel? by Have+Blue · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, they aren't cheap. Apple spent a large amount on R&D for the iPod design and interface, that's why they sue to protect it.

  10. Is video really needed? by antarctican · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Alright, how many people actually have the need for a mobile video device. I mean, audio I can understand, but how often have you sat on the subway going, "I'd really like to watch a movie right now." That must be one long commute....

    I mean the only use I can think of is for mobile pr0n needs, and if that's the case, I sure as hell don't want to be sitting next to them wthhout a raincoat.

  11. ip-p-p-p-pPod! by RalphBNumbers · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It looks and feels just like an iPod! (of course, they don't mention it working, sheesh).

    I can just see MS coming out with something the size of an ipod, but with a tiny flash memory instead of a hard drive. And if MS markets it hard enough and makes it ubiquitous enough, the uninformed consumers will just slurp it up and think they're getting a huge bargin (despite there having been flash players that cheap for a long time).

    --
    "The worst tyrannies were the ones where a governance required its own logic on every embedded node." - Vernor Vinge
  12. Ummm ... BMP, GIF, PNG, and TIFF? by dmarcov · · Score: 5, Funny
    Impressively it plays MPEG2, MPEG4, BMP, GIF, PNG, TIFF and MP3


    Really? I can't wait to rawk to my .bmp files. I wonder what my desktop wallpaper sounds like.
    1. Re:Ummm ... BMP, GIF, PNG, and TIFF? by BandwidthHog · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wonder what my desktop wallpaper sounds like.

      bzzzzt, crackle, fft, pssssst, bzzt, ffft, bzzzzzt, pst, eck, bzzzz, bzzzt, psst, crackle, bzzzzt, crackle, pssst, pst, ffft, bzzt, bzzzzzt.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  13. Only on Slashdot by Atario · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...does the first reply in an article get modded "redundant".

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  14. Oh not again, Bill by BandwidthHog · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ours will be just like Apple's, only better.

    This time we're serious. It's really cool.

    Really.

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  15. Yes but by smartin · · Score: 3, Funny

    It will be the size of a postage stamp and hold one song.

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
  16. drunken moderation by Unit3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's a fun game! Moderate the first mention of OGG Vorbis as a troll, because, you know, people aren't allowed to express format preferences... and then, moderate the second mention as redundant, because it is too politely worded to be a troll!

    Yeah, I know "don't complain about moderation". Good thing this is an open forum and I can complain about retarded moderation if I want.

    --
    -- sudo.ca
  17. Re:That's nice, but... by jrockway · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yup, you get what you pay for. Dell makes some cheap laptops, but they have this tendency to fall apart in about a week. That doesn't happen with powerbooks.

    And as for their music player, it's rediculous. They make you pay extra for "enhanced" (i.e. non-crippled) software, and I'm sure the hardware isn't as good as Apple's. Apple, unfortunately (for their sales department), always adds features that are hard to market. For instance, read any review of MP3 players and you'll find that Apple's sound output hardware (DA converters, amp, etc.) is the best. But you can't really market that.

    Oh well. The people who want a good music player will buy the Apple and the people who want a new toy will buy the M$ box. That's the way things have always been, and I don't see how it affects me if M$ makes a $50 music box. Whatever :P Apple has earned my loyalty by making a great product; Microsoft's business practices (and OS) make me want to blow up their headquarters on a daily basis. I'm sure others agree with me :)

    --
    My other car is first.
  18. Geeks don't understand fashion by HonkyLips · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These articles shit me. The thing is, Apple is a fashionable company. They make fashionable computers and fashionable products and this puts them in a different league to Microsoft et al. Geeks do not, by their very nature, understand fashion. Microsoft's competing product may be cheaper, Sony's may have more features etc etc. That will mean nothing to a kid who wants an iPod. I doubt that Ferrari were worried when Kia/ Daewoo/ Hyundai popped onto the car scene; I don't think Armani is worried that you can buy shirts for $20 at Kmart, and so on. The Apple iPod is a fashion accessory. Paris Hilton ( or insert vacuous celebrity here) won't be caught dead using a cheap Microsoft rip off and millions of teenagers will feel the same way. Apple could double the price of their iPod range and they'd still sell them. Apples are desirable. They're cool. Microsoft has never been cool and never will be no matter what they do. Can you really imagine a company owned and run by Bill Gates producing something that teenagers everywhere go nuts for? Compare their interface designs to Apple's.... Sony are too sensibly Japanese to be cool. There is no iPod killer. When cool people start saying "Levis are dead - I can buy jeans for 1/5 the price at Target" then maybe, just maybe, Apple should start to worry.....

    --
    Putting syrup in coffee is some form of blasphemy.
    1. Re:Geeks don't understand fashion by cft_128 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Geeks do not, by their very nature, understand fashion.

      My imaginary girlfriend would totally agree with you if she didn't live in Canada.

      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

  19. Another "iPod killer..." by sillivalley · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Geez, not another one! I expect the Sony product to be well designed, a lot of attention to detail -- and high priced. And don't forget, Sony has built-in schizophrenia -- their music division -- MP3 is evil, remember? Sony could have owned the market with mini-disc, but their own paranoia crippled the product (no high-speed digital download, clunky proprietary software, etc.)

    But a friend points me to the Sony announcement -- it plays movies, all these formats. Does it have a corkscrew, I ask? GPS?

    What? Corkscrew? GPS? Yeah, if it's going to replace things, it should play my AV stuff, have a corkscrew, show me where I am, and be sturdy enough to pound nails...

    Really -- what I want in a portable music player is to play music. I don't care about video, GPS, cell phone, or anything else.

    As to the iPod killer? It's already on the market. It stores enough of my music, the battery lasts long enough, it drives my earphones (Etymotics ER4), and it's small enough to carry in a pocket.

    It's the iPod mini. It does what I want, and I love it.

  20. FUD by Coward+Anonymous · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Classic Microsoft. There is no way MS could or would want to release such a cheap device but it sure as hell is great to FUD everyone out of buying an iPOD.

  21. The benefits of these devices by Infonaut · · Score: 4, Interesting
    from a consumer standpoint - for almost $600 what am I getting?

    Well, for $300 you can get 15Gb of storage on the low-end iPod. For $500 you can get $40Gb of storage on the high-end iPod.

    The iPod/iTunes combo has become the core of my audio system. I don't have a boom box or home stereo system. I hook my iPod into my stereo TV when I want to listen to tunes downstairs. When I want to listen to tunes upstairs, I listen to the tunes through my computer's speakers. When I'm driving in the car, I plug in my tape deck adapter and go.

    When I go for a run or go to work out, I take my iPod and have all of my tunes with me. So in that sense it's not just "a Walkman that doesn't need CDs or tapes." A CD Walkman is fine if I just want to listen to whatever CDs I happen to have with me at the time. But when I'm mobile, the last thing I want to do is decide which tunes I think I'll want to listen to at some point in the future. I want the whole range of my music library available.

    I'm not rich. Not even close. I like my music a lot, but I'm not the music freak I was when I was in my teens. All the same, the iPod has really changed my listening habits quite a bit. It allows me to listen to a broader range of my own music than I otherwise would, lets me listen to music pretty much anywhere, and eliminates the need to haul around discs or tapes wherever I go.

    Prices will doubtless drop on these devices as they become commoditized. Someday they'll drop to a price that will be acceptable to you. In the mean time, the investment in my iPod has more than justified the cost several times over for me (and for my non-technophile wife, who is an iPod addict as well).

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  22. Silicone Breast Implants by malia8888 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Microsoft will begin selling a $50 music player that will 'look and feel as good as the iPod' later this year.

    Pardon my cynical attitude but I cannot imagine an item that sells for $50 for 20G versus the Apple model for the same size at $399 looking and feeling remotely the same.

    I have one of the original 5G iPods. I have used, abused and it runs beautifully. The design and looks are without peer IMHO.

    This sort of reminds me of plastic surgeons who claim silicone breast implants have the same look and feel as the real deal.

    --
    Harpo Tunnel Syndrome--my wrist feels funny.
  23. I hearby coin a new term by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Blue note of death"

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  24. Loss Leader by CatGrep · · Score: 3, Interesting

    However, even Dell's digital jukeboxes start at $200, and beating Dell pricewise is something out of ordinary (possible, but few have done it).

    I would suspect that with a $50 pricetag, Micro$oft is losing some amount of money per unit. They want to make the money on the music sales. Like razors or cameras - make money on the blades/film.

    1. Re:Loss Leader by John+Newman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Except there's already another monopolistic group determined to make an obscene profit on the music sales, who will probably not appreciate being squeezed by MS. But if MS wants to get into a licensing brawl with the RIAA, part of me thinks "go for it".

    2. Re:Loss Leader by mcc · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I would suspect that with a $50 pricetag, Micro$oft is losing some amount of money per unit. They want to make the money on the music sales. Like razors or cameras - make money on the blades/film.

      I disagree. I think that if the pricetag is $50, then Microsoft intends to lose money on the units AND the music sales (similar to how the XBox, a current venture loses money overall).

      Microsoft more likely than not intends to lose gobs of money overall on the entire music venture, with only two goals in mind:
      1. Prevent Apple from making money.
      2. Try to force WMA to take over the online music market and prevent an MPEG-4 based solution from doing so.
  25. Who cares if they lose money... by nonameisgood · · Score: 3, Funny

    they'll make it up on volume!

    --
    Anyone else notice that MS stock is going for less than Apple?

    --
    Faith is the very antithesis of reason, injudiciousness a critical component of spiritual devotion. Jon Krakauer
  26. Re:Look and Feel by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't worry. It will cost $50 just like iPod Mini cost $100.

    Unless of course they force you to use a Microsoft online music service to get music (and not let you play your own MP3s). Then it makes sense for them to sell you a $400 item for $50, and make a killing on the actual songs... (kinda like they do with XBox).

    --

    "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

  27. Sneak Peek... by Dr.+Mojura · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apparently someone got their grubby little hands on a beta version of Microsoft's iPod killer. I must say, it's very stylish, and I wouldn't mind losing the portability of my iPod to show off this baby. Hot!

    --
    "Nothing exists except atoms and empty space; everything else is opinion." - Democritus
  28. YAIW by pherris · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Yet another iPod wannabe. Let's see what Apple and/or Jobs have created in the past:

    Mac OS. Man, in some ways Mac OS 9 is still better than Windows XP.

    NeXT Cube. What a sweet machine. There was nothing like it then and still respected today.

    NeXTStep. IMO still the best OS made. So good Mac OS X uses huge chucks of it.

    Newton. Bumpy at first but the last models released are still better IMO than any other pda.

    Mac Cube. Very cool looking and quiet. They still get top dollar on ebay today.

    iMac. The original iMac gave us style where style had been missing. Beige was dead and you were proud of your Bondi Blue machine.

    ... and of course the iPod.

    I know I've missed a few other marvels and I'm sure there's some cool stuff they never released. With all that said don't you think that Apple already has a working video iPod prototype that could be in production in less than 30 days? The magic eight ball says "Yes".

    I have yet to see someone scoop Apple in style and thunder, and IMO MS/Sony won't do it this time. I don't care how good it is, Apple will make their's better.

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
  29. Re:That's nice, but... by bonhomme_de_neige · · Score: 3, Informative
    Yup, you get what you pay for. Dell makes some cheap laptops, but they have this tendency to fall apart in about a week. That doesn't happen with powerbooks.

    That statement borders on blatant trolling! However, since I have faith in your high moral caliber and good intentions, I'll assume what you meant to say was "Dell laptops have higher rates of failure (or lower MTBF) than powerbooks, and here are the statistics to back it up. You can clearly see that the dramatic difference in failure rates justifies the 2x price difference (or some portion thereof, the rest being accounted for by superior features, etc).". That would be a convincing argument. Unfortunately, I've yet to see it phrased that way. Moreover, if your Dell laptop does happen to fail in a week, there is this thing called warranty, which I hear Dell is pretty good about.

    And as for their music player, it's rediculous. They make you pay extra for "enhanced" (i.e. non-crippled) software, and I'm sure the hardware isn't as good as Apple's.

    I'm not going to deny that Dell's music player isn't the best. In fact, the iPod is much better, but I would make that choice based on the individual products involved (ie. the iPod, vs. the Dell player), not based on the companies' track records at making some other product (although you could argue that inability to make good laptops is correlated with inability to make good portable mp3 players ... but to that I say that just because a company makes better laptops doesn't mean it will make good mp3 players either). Similarly, when the MS player comes out, I'll judge it against the iPod based on the characteristics of those two specific gadgets - not the quality of Windows against Mac OS, nor the quality of MS mice over Apple mice, or some other equally irrelevant benchmark.

    For instance, read any review of MP3 players and you'll find that Apple's sound output hardware (DA converters, amp, etc.) is the best.

    I would dispute this. The iPod hardware has nothing over, say, the hardware used by the Creative Jukeboxen (except, maybe, size, which is a separate category to sound quality when comparing mp3 players). The Jukebox produces sound that is no less clean and vibrant, and also supports things like 4 channel output and a whole heap of EAX post-processing (a small fraction of which, believe it or not, is actually useful!! I know, I had a hard time believing it too.). Not only have I read reviews that say this, but I've compared the sound from an iPod and a Jukebox too. Even if the iPod hardware is better by some absolute measurement of fidelity, it is not a difference 99.8% of the population would pick up in a blind listening test.

    But you can't really market that.

    You're saying that in a device the purpose of which is to play music, you can't market the quality of the sound that comes out? If it's not marketable, why do the very reviews you speak of mention it? Tell you what, just send me some of whatever you're smoking and we'll call it even.

    Microsoft's business practices (and OS) make me want to blow up their headquarters on a daily basis. I'm sure others agree with me :)

    What a concise summary of the rest of your post!

    --
    "Why are you watching the washing machine?"
    "I love entertainment, as long as it's clean"
  30. Re:Rio Karma by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Karma's a whopping 1.1 inches thick to the iPod's 0.62. It also appears to have been designed by someone with a terrible hangover from the late '90s.

    After that, everything else is just quibbling. Still, I should point out that you neglected to mention the iPod's new lossless codec.

  31. Re:Rio Karma by outZider · · Score: 5, Informative

    You forgot a few things on the iPod:

    Width: 0.62"
    Interfaces: FireWire 400 AND USB2
    Extras also include Smart Playlists and auto playlist syncing.

    Also, an interface that doesn't suck the balls.

    --
    - oZ
    // i am here.