Second quarter Open Source Awards announced
JohnGrahamCumming writes "The Open Source Initiative has announced its Q2 award winners here. Three people/projects got $500 Merit Awards: Martin Pool for distcc, Tom Lord for GNU Arch and The GIMP. OSI is currently looking for nominations for the Q3 awards to be announced at OSCON."
And who said Open Source can't be financially rewarding...
Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
So, let me get this straight. Open Source awards are given out 4 times a year. Why so ofter? Doens't that downplay the importance of the awards.
Evolution or ID?
"OSI is currently looking for nominations for the Q3 awards to be announced at OSCON."
I nominate these (wide) open sourcers from Washington state.I'd like to thank Linus, and Richard--This one's for you, Richard!--and the brave guys and gals at CollabNet. And for those of you just getting started, I'd like to say... this trophy is worth more than all the stock options I ever received!
The CB App. What's your 20?
Autotrace is a program that converts bitmaps to vector drawings: http://autotrace.sourceforge.net/
Imgseek classifies bitmap images based on similarity . http://imgseek.sourceforge.net/
Both would be awesome if converted into libraries used by other programs.
No-one has done more for open source this year than Eric S. Raymond. He picked apart SCO's arguments against Linux and rallied Sun to open up Java.
I think they should consider nominating pearpc
pearpc.sourceforge.net because that project acommplished what many people tought to be imposible.I mean a ppc emulator that runs OSX deserves a prize.
Glad to see GIMP getting an award. The new version is excellent on Windows XP, too. Amazing! If you need a program to edit photos, GIMP is all you need.
CoLinux is interesting too. It allows you to run Linux natively, side by side with Windows, at kernel-level. That beats emulators hands-down.
It should get nominated.
It would seem to me that the awards go to people/teams that have created great Open Source software, not evangelists.
I could be wrong though.
Im sure some people here will claim $500 isnt a lot of money, but its programmers were talking about here - imagine how much ramen that is !
It would be nice if they could (a) increase the number, and (b) increase the monetary value of the awards. But, with what money?
I have no idea (and I did read a bit) how they manage their money, other than their 503(c) status and necessary government reporting. Do they have an endowment, or do they rely on annual donations to cover the annual (and quarterly) awards?
I would hope they have an endowment. If so, It'd be nice to know how one could make small (less than $100!) donations to the endowment. After all, if lots of little guys would start giving to funds like this*, than they could give out mo'bigger awards, resulting in more media coverage as well as help fund good coders in future projects.
So... do they have an endowment? Do they accept small donations to help fund this endowment? Anybody got details?
* as well as the EFF and other "goods"
Support a few technologists in Washington.
Tom's been struggling financially for a while, and even had to stop developing Arch because he didn't have enough funds. Arch is the only open source revision control system that is comparable to BitKeeper. Subversion may be an improvement on CVS, but it's nowhere near as comprehensive as Arch or BK. Incidentally, even Larry McVoy admits that Arch has the potential to be even better than BK. The current difference is that BK is much more polished and production ready.
"The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
I'd like to nominate Wilhelm IV for open sourcing Beer back in 1516.
#include "barley"
#include "hops"
#include "water"
#include "yeast"
The Neo-Bohemian Techno-Socialist