Slashdot Mirror


Sun & Fujitsu Team On SPARC Chips & System

An anonymous reader writes "Sun and Fujitsu just announced a 20-year partnership to jointly develop SPARC based technology and systems. It looks like the long-predicted partnership that was hinted at earlier has finally come to pass in a much more comprehensive manner than I've heard anyone predict, i.e. not just chips, but a unified range of systems. My guess: Sun drops Ultrasparc III to provide the Throughput computing chips for the low end / web / network stuff, and takes up the Fujitsu provided SPARC64 chips for the high end and workstation market. Will this spark a new RISC renaissance for Sun and Fujitsu? Or is it a last gasp before Opteron / PowerPC / Itanium crush them? I for one will be interested to see what systems and processors come out of this. This could really revitalize the SPARC system market, especially if Sun's work on Throughput computing proves out."

34 of 121 comments (clear)

  1. that's why... by hutkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Japan is called "Land of the rising Sun"

  2. Wonder how this fits into the free hardware by uberkuba · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hehehe... hope they know that Sun wants to give their hardware away.

  3. Throughput computing by shoppa · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I always thought Sun's only realistic market for "Throughput computing" (maximizing ops/watt) was dense server farms (e.g. blades). Now it is true that this market is playing out quite like everyone (especially Sun) wanted it to, but it is a real market.

    For thin-client stuff, while low power consumption is a priority, it's not a big enough one to warrant the amount of money that Sun and others have spent on it. Maybe, just maybe, as a spinoff.

    These "find a market for our new processor" discussions are getting a little depressing. I remember being excited about the DEC Alpha for embedded applications, but since then it all feels hollow.

  4. What's actually going on here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1) Sun is having troubles convincing its partners that its multi-core "throughput computing" chip will be competitive. That Gartner report is causing people to ask questions about whether Sun can deliver on its promises. And who wants a 500Mhz 16 core chip anyway? Think of the memory bandwidth problems!

    2) Fujitsu Sparc core spanks Suns own core.

    My prediction? Sun will abandon its multi-core, asynchronous research pipedreams and farm out all CPU design to Fujitsu. CPU design is a very costly (comoditised) business for Sun to be in, and as Apple have shown its the system that matters, not the processor.

    1. Re:What's actually going on here... by turgid · · Score: 4, Funny
      And who wants a 500Mhz 16 core chip anyway? Think of the memory bandwidth problems!

      Who wants a single (or dual) core 5GHz chip anyway? Think of the memory bandwidth problems.

    2. Re:What's actually going on here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You want 16 cores because servers (especially Sun ones) tend to run many process, with many threads. You want to distribute those threads across multiple CPUs so one doesn't bog down the whole system.

      Regarding memory bandwidth: look at Sun's I/O bus architecture.

    3. Re:What's actually going on here... by larien · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, there are other issues like lock contentions (making sure 2 CPUs aren't using the same chunk of RAM) but the point is correct. The problem with 16 500MHz cores is that a single threaded app will still run at the same speed as a single 500MHz core; you would be able to run more of them at the same time on the 16 cores, though.

    4. Re:What's actually going on here... by turgid · · Score: 4, Informative

      You run Solaris on SPARC processors. Solaris is highly multi-threaded from the ground up. It's extremely fine-grained. It also has some sophisticated algorithms for migrating threads to the most appropriate processor based on things like memory locality and load. (Forgive me if my terminology isn't terribly accurate, I'm not an OS kernel expert). The Niagra and ROCK processors are designed to execute highly multithreaded loads. Fujitsu SPARC64 is more traditional, in that it is designed for loads with fewer concurrent threads. By adopting Fujitsu's high-end gear, Sun gets performance on less thread-intesive loads too. Now Sun and Fujitsu have a horse for every course, so to speak. If I were HP trying to sell itanic boxes, and cranky old (soon to be exterminated) PA-RISC kit, I'd be very worried.

    5. Re:What's actually going on here... by jschottm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > as Apple have shown its the system that matters, not the processor.

      Yes, but remember, Apple was hurting for quite some time after Motorola stopped working on high end PPC chips. The stagnant G4 hurt Apple - I use encoding software that had started out on Macs but moved the focus of its development to Windows after the the G4 lost steam. The apple version still exists and is supported, but lacks some of the features of the Windows version. And while I've not had a chance to run it on a G5, a dual Athlon MP utterly spanks a dual G4.

      The G5 certainly helps, but it still leaves Apple at the mercy of an outside supplier.

    6. Re:What's actually going on here... by turgid · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Apache runs just fine on commodity hardware.

      So it does. There's more to life than apache though.

      I dare you to look at this. Then, think for a minute about what sort of things you'd use it for.

    7. Re:What's actually going on here... by FatherOfONe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oracle would absolutely take advantage of this. Any multi-threaded app would. Like say most of the mid-tier app servers. So in some cases it would be possible to have your database, app-server and web server on one box. Granted that box could be setup with different partitions, (similar to vmware in the low cost world, or perhaps user mode linux).

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    8. Re:What's actually going on here... by turgid · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The new highly-multithreaded chips have much shorter pipelines unlike current headless-chicken designs like Pentium 4, which operate at obscene clock frequencies but take ages to refill after a pipeline stall hence spening a lot of their clock cycles doing nothing. The idea is that the chip has several simple low-latency cores with many "thread contexts" which can be switched in with a 0-cylce delay when the current thread blocks. So, going back to your Amdahl's Law, the "unimproved fraction" (1-P) on one of these processors is proportionally smaller in many cases where your clock frequency increase on your Pentium would buy you little benefit. Or something.

      Witness intel's recent change of direction regarding the future of Pentium. They've all but EOL's the Pentium 4 Netburst architecture and are now going multi-core. It took an anouncement from their competitors though, and lengthy explanations and analysis in the industry press, before they did, once it was absolutely clear that the clock frequency wars were over. Intel is well behind, but they have an absolutely astronomical R&D budget.

  5. Re:20 years? by syphoon · · Score: 4, Informative

    You were misled by the OP, but RTFA please. The press release said they're expanding their relationship that's already existed for 20 years. Not that they're announcing a 20 year partnership.

  6. Throughput Computing and the Transputer by dnnrly · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sun's description of Throughput Computing and their approach of putting multiple processor cores reminds me of what Inmos tried to do with the Transputer before they became STMicroelectronics. The idea was to have many small processors positioned close to each other, communicating between each other closely. I seem to recall seeing transputers on eBay a while back for huge amounts of money. By all accounts, a transputer board was a very useful piece of kit for the right appplications!

  7. Will this spark by zBoD · · Score: 2, Funny

    > Will this spark

    Ha ha ha, very funny.

    --
    BoD
  8. They announced their partnership? by farmhick · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did they have to drive from California to Boston for the ceremony?

    And which one wore the dress? ;^)

    --
    I have to stop wasting so much time reading Slashdot. It's interfering with my crystal meth addiction.
  9. Re:20 years? by Ratbert42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    NEW YORK, NY -- July 8, 1987 -- Sun Microsystems, Inc., introduced today the Sun-4 family of 10-MIPS supercomputing workstations and servers that give users the performance of a VAX 8800 system at one-tenth the price.
    ...
    Sun also announced that it will license the new SPARC architecture... SPARC licensees announced today are Fujitsu Microelectronics, Cypress Semiconductor, and Bipolar Integrated Technology.
    ...

  10. Re:Crush Fujitsu... maybe. by thesupraman · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sigh.

    Please try to remember that entry to the 'Top 500' list is as much about your interconnect topology and technology as the capabilities of the processors used.

    It is a measure of one, and exactly one benchmark, LINPACK

    Machines which are not well suited to this benchmark, or do not have network technologies/topologies well matching linpacks requirements will perform poorly at it, but possibly very well for their chosen purpose.

    Good examples of this are the WETA digital clusters used in parts of the LOTR films, which are great for rendering, but hampered seriously in their linpack result by their 100MBit standard ethernet connections.

    Another good example of this is the Virginia Tech G5 cluster, which gets a LARGE boost from it's infiniband interconnects (well, it will when Apple finish giving them the new machines... eventually..).

    Not that I am defending SPARC's rather lackluster performance these days, just making a rather important point.

    Those SPARC boxes better get a LOT cheaper VERY fast if they intend to find any real home in HPC.

  11. other market by millahtime · · Score: 3, Informative

    They have another market in high end engineering desktops. For people who design chips and other detailed components and need to simulate them there is still a market for their work stations.

    Now, the other chips are catching quick on this so they need to stay ahead or they could loose that market too.

    1. Re:other market by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      They already lost that market. I know quite a few engineers that two years ago couldn't wait for the Opteron to ship so that they could get a cheap fast system to do design work on. They absolutly HAD to have 64bit support as their chip routing would often take 8-12GB of RAM to run in a single process but they were tired of paying SUN prices. When you can get a dual Opteron system with 16GB for less than the 16GB RAM upgrade from SUN you can see why they have lost the market.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  12. Re:sun problem by grigori · · Score: 4, Informative

    Baloney. I've had power drop out and kill Sun machines and they just come right back. Are you talking about file system check? Just turn on logging in /etc/vfstab and even that goes away, just like the same reason you use ext3 instead of ext2 on Linux.

  13. Did Sun.... by wpiman · · Score: 2, Funny
    happen to mention that their business model includes free hardware? (see yesterdays article)

    That is a slick move- offer free hardware- and then team up with a hardware company to pay for it. Brilliant.

  14. Re:20 years? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And its not going good.

    The reason Sun is losing is because the SparcV should be out that is comptetive agaisnt (theoritical) agaisnt the power, mips, and Opteron.

    TI who actually fabricates teh chips is pulling a Motorolla in order to gain more profits by not upgrading their plants.

    Either they innovate and skip the sparcIV and leep to the sparcV and develop the sparcVI or give in to Opteron now and save the company.

  15. Re:sun problem by larien · · Score: 2, Informative
    I'm with grigori; never had a problem with power failures on a properly configured Sun box. The only server I know of which has a problem is the E150, which you can't power on from init 5 without either a keyboard or a screwdriver. The E150 is probably the worst put together piece of hardware I've ever seen and it astounds me that Sun released it.

    Besides, power failures shouldn't happen; you should have UPS on all important servers so power failures shouldn't be a problem at all.

  16. Confusing and mixed messages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So yesterday there was the post about hardware being free and today there's news about Sun partnership for UltraSparc. Make up your freaking mind SUN. I still like SUN hardware for dense deployments where you got tons of racks, since Intel and AMD both run considerably hotter than UltraSparc. Sun needs to make up its mind about whether they believe UltraSparc has a future and stick to it. PC hardware is still isn't as reliable as high end Unix, so it's stupid to drop their R&D for high end systems. Some things simply scale better vertically than horizontally.

  17. Re:20 years? by Dj · · Score: 3, Informative

    And you seem to not do your research.

    http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Fujitsu

    The company was established in 1935 under the name Fuji Tsshinki Seiz, a spinoff of the Fuji Electric company, this in turn being a joint venture between the Furukawa mining company and German conglomerate Siemens.

    Or how about more obviously....

    http://pr.fujitsu.com/en/profile/profile.html

    Fujitsu is a leading provider of customer-focused information technology and communications solutions for the global marketplace. Since Fujitsu's establishment in 1935, we have maintained a commitment to cutting-edge technological innovation and uncompromising product quality.

    So only 50 years out there old chap. :)

    --
    "You know you want me baby!" - Crow T Robot
  18. Open-source platform for games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if funding a kind of open-sourced game development platform wouldn't help the hardware manufacturers (e.g. Sun in this case for the processors and ATI etc. for the graphics) sell their wares. All 3D-engine stuff wide open and free, so that a prospective game maker would not have to buy an engine license.

    Problems of course:
    - need an installed base to sell enough games
    - state of the art engine does not grow on trees
    - willingness of hardware types to work together

    Possible Pros:
    - open standard encourages performance improvements for the next generation that don't break older applications
    - massively distributed bug fixing

  19. Re:20 years? by christophersaul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why 'give in' to Opteron? It fits in well with the Sparc kit and Sun are already aggressively marketing Opteron.

    Sun are capable of having a strategy that can move with the market, as well as dictating to the market, as appropriate. I get tired of people on Slashdot claiming one company or product is 'dead' just because it has a competitor.

    Sun also aren't particularly 'losing', as you put it. Unit shipments were up 26% for the first quarter of 2004, with the UIIIi systems selling extremely well - and they're positioned directly against the Xeon based stuff that Slashdot readers tell us is going to take over the world.

  20. In two years SPARC won't exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With the Millenium project dead and buried Sun is relying on Ultra SPARC III to carry the comapny until "Mid 2006" when Fujitsu's and Sun's products will be shared between them. The current Niagra design (from Afara) is so low end that Sun will be luck to sell a few hundred systems based on it. If they didn't need a throughput computing product on the market RIGHT NOW they would have killed Niagra already.

    When the inevitable schedule slips on Niagra II and Rock come to light (the original Niagra from Afara was "almost done" when Sun bought them two years ago, it's only just taped out) Sun will have no choice but to fall on it's sword and admit defeat. The company might survive if it can convince enough customers to recompile and move to Opteron based systems while sticking with Solaris, but that's going to be a hard sell when they can recompile for linux and not be locked into Sun's software/services stack.

  21. Re:Cunning writers by christophersaul · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They're not dropping an architecture - the architecture's still the same - Sparc.

    UltraSparc has not been solidly beaten - UIV is out there now and doing well in the market. It's what follows it that will be jointly developed with Fujitsu, which will operate alongside the forthcoming Niagara and Rock multicore CPUs. Hardly a case of abandoing anything.

    The fact that there's another company investing in and developing their own Sparc CPUs validates the whole architecture in the first place.

    I agree with you that the strategy makes sense - low end with the 'i' range and Opteron Solaris/Solaris x86/Linux, with Solaris/Sparc for the mid to highend.

  22. Itanium crushing something? by invisik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't think the Itanium is going to be crushing anything in it's short lifetime. However, the PowerPC/Opteron chips are putting the smack down quite nicely about now. We need them to bring back that Open spec for PPC hardware so we can get some serious speed and off of Intel..... !

    -m

    --
    http://www.invisik.com
  23. Worst intro paragraph ever! by oldmanmtn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sun and Fujitsu just announced a 20-year partnership to jointly develop SPARC based technology and systems.

    They have had a partnership for 20 years - they aren't announcing a new one.

    My guess: Sun drops Ultrasparc III

    Sun is already shipping the Ultrasparc IV. Nice guess!

    to provide the Throughput computing chips for the low end / web / network stuff,

    They have already announced that this is exactly what they are going to do. Again: nice guess!

    and takes up the Fujitsu provided SPARC64 chips for the high end and workstation market.

    Yesterday's announcement was all about using SPARC64 on the high end. Usually the trick is reading between the lines - not reading the lines themselves.

    Sun also announced that they will be using Opterons in their new workstation line - not SPARC64.

    Will this spark a new RISC renaissance for Sun and Fujitsu? Or is it a last gasp before Opteron / PowerPC / Itanium crush them?

    Itanium has gone white dwarf. The only thing it will be crushing is itself.

    Opteron is not going to crush Sun. They have announced that they are shipping multiple Opteron boxes (1-8 way servers and 1-2 way workstations).

    This could really revitalize the SPARC system market, especially if Sun's work on Throughput computing proves out.

    This doesn't even make sense. The Fujitsu/Sun machines are not the Throughput Computing systems that Sun has been talking about for months. Throughput compututing is Niagara/Rock - the Sun-only CPUs.

    --
    - Old Man of the Mountain ---- "I want to disturb my neighbor"
  24. And I, for one... by the_olo · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...welcome our new Sun&Fujitsu overlords!

  25. The best use for Solaris Zones: N1 Grid by _damnit_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The real upside of of zones is when combined with N1 Grid. I know it sounds really amorphous, but with zones it really starts to make sense. Imagine rolling out a new zone or dozens when needed across a datacenter full of stock Solaris 10 machines (x86 or SPARC). The storage is on EMC or Hitachi, so you just hand out LUNS like candy for the zone's "/" with predefined pkgs and patches and you have a really dynamic environment for Oracle 10g, webservices, etc.
    This is the story that needs to be told, but I sometimes think Sun is using Novell's old marketing team.

    DISCLAIMER: I work for Sun but I try not to drink the company Kool Aid.

    --


    _damnit_

    It's my job to freeze you. -- Logan's Run