Slashdot Mirror


Short Text Messages In Mid-Air

bahree writes "The BBC is running an interesting story on how Nokia is making a mobile that lets you write short text messages in mid-air. The messages are written using a row of LEDs fitted on the rear cover of Nokia's forthcoming 3220 phone. A motion sensor in the phone makes the lights blink in a sequence that spells out letters when the handset is waved in the air."

15 of 331 comments (clear)

  1. Innovation? by BWJones · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK, the social engineering that is going on here is getting out of control. It's bad enough that you have someone talking on their phones in the elevator/restaurant/movie theatre or on the subway behind you about all sorts of things (many of which are quite personal), but now we are going to get people gesticulating madly, waving their arms back and forth to send messages.

    Lets have some real innovation, yes? Rather than fun and games with LEDs, what I would like to see some real innovation in in terms of interaction with cell phones much like iChatAV (prevents having to remember phone numbers etc...), whereby you could call someone wherever they may be over TCP/IP or have servers automatically negotiate phone calls through traditional land lines if the receiver of the call is not available on the iChatAV equivalent. It could be relatively easy to establish a hierarchy of places to contact a person starting with VOIP, then progressing on down to sending a voice to text message at the very last.

    Right now at least, we do have phones (V600) that will automatically negotiate networks (so I can have one phone to travel with internationally rather than having to keep two or three depending upon the networks), but most of these phones have maddening interfaces and that in of itself could use some thought and effort. Look, placing GUI interfaces on lots of stuff is OK if it streamlines your operation of the device, but the phone companies and even automobile manufacturers are using lousy GUI interfaces to perform simple tasks. (I absolutely refuse to consider the new BMW's because of that stupid GUI that has to be navigated through three screens to change the radio station or move the seat or change the temperature.

    Sorry for the rant.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Innovation? by snooo53 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I too am disappointed that more companies don't make devices that let you configure things yourself. I too wish I could tweak menus and defaults. To me personally, it doesn't matter if it's open source or not... but it would be nice to have more control.

      I guess I can see a reason why companies don't like to do this... because inevitably people who manage to break their phones will complain and bog down the tech support/return centers. But all this could be solved by simply having a "reset button". Put a copy of the firmware in ROM... as soon as the button is pressed it reverts to that. Very simple. I can't think of a single reason not to do something like that. People would love having that much control of their phone. Look at how popular ringers and backgrounds have become.

      --
      The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
    2. Re:Innovation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      To the comment: "Right now at least, we do have phones (V600) that will automatically negotiate networks (so I can have one phone to travel with internationally rather than having to keep two or three depending upon the networks), but most of these phones have maddening interfaces and that in of itself could use some thought and effort."

      You responded, in part: "All GSM phones I know of are perfectly capable of selecting which network they should use..."

      My response: This is not true all of the time. The poster pointed out "...(so i can have phone to travel with internationally..." International GSM networks operate at a slightly different GSM bands. For example, in the UK, the service is provided over GSM 900/1800/1900 Mhz while here in the US we operate at 850/1800/1900. My phone for example (Sony Ericsson T616) has the UK counter-part (the T610) which has the band difference. If someone with a T616 were to go to the UK then it would attempt connection at GSM 850 and fail, resorting to the other frequencies (1800 and 1900) only when it finds a network that uses the other frequencies will it work. A person from the UK with the T610 would experience the same here in the states: phone fails to locate on 900Mhz, attempts on the other two. Which GSM Band is used by providers is left up to them. AT&T Wireless for example, only uses GSM850. Meaning that at 1800 or 1900 there is no connectivity from AT&T Wireless, and if only AT&T Wireless exists in that area, then there is no connectivity at all. What's more not all GSM handsets are "Tri-band" some are actually "Dual-band" or "Single-band" (Sony Ericsson T226 for example is only dual band, GSM850 and 1900).

      So you've got fundamental differences in the networks (GSM Bands) no enforcement for providers to operate on all available bands, and non-standard handsets that don't even "get" all of the bands, makes for some very, very confusing travel. Not to mention that after all of this, you get connectivity abroad, you'll be paying out the nose in roaming charges.

  2. Prepare for some UGLY ascii art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just look at all the ugly ascii art we see from the ./ trolls.

    Now imagine some retarded 15 year old high school loser waving an animated picture in the air in front of you.

  3. innovation?? i think not by fodi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ahhh... this is what happens when your R&D dept. can't keep up with the marketing dept...

    gimmiks for the kiddies...

  4. Great for in the movies... by ebsf1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's annoying enough having people using cell phones for normal sms messages in movie theatres...imagine the waving of phones in movie theatres that will happen now...of course if the message happened to be a target...

  5. JUST TALK TO ONE ANOTHER!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    How stupid is this. Just open your mouth and talk the the person you can fricken see. Rediculous. I am sure there will be a plethora of posts about how someway this could be integrated with Linux or a beowulf cluster by a loser sitting at home living with his parents, compiling the latest kernel.

  6. Re:This would be great for... by Johnathon_Dough · · Score: 4, Insightful
    As a part time DJ, I can say with some authority, that this is a good way to get your phone thrown across the room.

    It's bad enough being surrounded by bouncing people and seizure inducing light shows with out some jackass waving their blinking cell phone at me to play some song I have no intention of playing anyway.

    --
    If you are one in a million, then there are six thousand people who are just like you.
  7. Ugh! by Bill_Royle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can see two positive things happening with this technology:

    1. People using this who accidentally hit people in the process will be sued, prompting them to stop using it.

    2. People using this may develop carpal tunnel or dislocations, prompting them to stop using it.

    Enough's enough. Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should - someone throw the engineer that came up with this off a cliff!

  8. Re:This would be great for... by Rebar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So far, this is the best use anyone has proposed for this feature, and it is better accomplished with a 50-cent pen and a bar-napkin.

  9. What will they think of next? by nytes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean, this is just amazing! A system that lets you send messages by waving your arms!

    Maybe in a few more years they'll invent a system which lets you send a message by entering just dots and dashes.

    --
    -- I have monkeys in my pants.
  10. Re:reverse mode by Dav3K · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was thinking of using it to tell the car beside me that their 'gas cap is open', or to 'check trailer' when the load becomes untied, etc. I can see this as a real hit for the public transport crowd, especially on trains or subway systems.

  11. Re:Road Rage! by ejaw5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, eventually it'll weed out all the bad drivers who like to use their cell phones while driving. Take your example where Driver A cuts off Driver B:

    Driver A: (taps onto phone) YOU CUT ME OFF
    Then waves phone, then (clears existing message and taps onto phone) YOU MOTHER (screams) AHHH! Truck Tire in the middle of the road! [...] (Crash).

    Driver B: (taps into phone, then waves arms) HA HA HA HA

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
  12. Survival Tool by ctime · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As much as this feature seems annoying to most people reading slashdot, it might actually come in handy in certain situations:

    That said, this is obviously only going to work in certain situations, namely dark rooms or at night, but what I find interesting is the fact it will be VERY easy and obvious for someone to pick you out of a crowd of people when your waving this around. Imagine emergency situations where it might be difficult to discribe your exact location and someone that is despirately trying to find you (At a concert, park, out lost in the wilderness etc), or even something as simple as alerting someone driving around trying to find you (and have never meet you before perhaps?), you could easily attract their attention, plus include a message they understand.

    Now, granted 99% of the time it's going to be completely useless, but for the fact that the other 1% of the time this allows you to communicate more effectively, I think it's really not a bad idea.

    I would also like to point out that the average slashdot reader should have no problems waving the phone around for extended periods of time (granted they use their right hand).

  13. Actually, could be useful by Ambush_Bug · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pretty much every comment has been disparaging... like "oooh... what do we need this for?"

    I can think of one case where it would be useful: hearing impaired individuals.... Imagine trying to shout across a a street or something to a deaf friend.. not going to work. but if you could wave and message them, then it allows communication over "earshot" distances easier.