Slashdot Mirror


Hotmail Loses Customer Files

Rick Zeman writes "News.com is reporting that Microsoft's Hotmail service has lost customers' files 'due to 'system events.' The particular user cited, of course, has no recourse because of the broad disclaimers companies such as Microsoft hide behind; however, you are getting what you pay for. The scariest part of the article, however, is when a spokesman for iBackup, an Internet-based backup company, disclaims,'We do not provide a 100 percent guarantee that the backup will take place' of customers' data being stored with them for a fee."

99 of 388 comments (clear)

  1. Oh no! by blowdart · · Score: 4, Funny

    I lost all those megabytes of increase my penis size email!

    1. Re:Oh no! by Nobody+You+Know · · Score: 4, Funny

      And whatever is that poor Nigerian businessman going to do now that I've lost his e-mail address?

    2. Re:Oh no! by BabyDave · · Score: 3, Interesting

      GET BIGGER, LONGER LASTING ... e-mail storage.

      Seriously though, if you RTFA, it's just one customer in this case, although the summary implies it was more - presumably because the article states that similar incidents have occurred in the past..

    3. Re:Oh no! by D-Cypell · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hahahaha... excellent!! I had the foresight not to use a hotmail address to conduct my business dealings, now those Nigerian millions are all mine!!!

      Fancy conducting multi-million business deals using hotmail! Im glad im not as big a fool as you!

    4. Re:Oh no! by gmack · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When is the last time a system problem like this affected just one user?

      Let me fill you in on something.. Tech support will tell you that you are the only person facing a certain problem even if all of their other customers are having the same problem. They will do that as long as they are sure you can't prove otherwise.

      I've my ISP say that even though my whole block was down. I've had a cell phone provider (Rogers') say that even though they sold me a phone with a very high return rate. As well as countless other examples.

      It's marketing.. they want to make the problem seem smaller thatn it is.

    5. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Laugh all you want, but I put my money where my mouth was, and tried every penis extender I got spam for, and now it's the size of a louisville slugger!

      But- I can no longer wear pants, and every time I get excited...I pass out.

      (Is there such a thing as anti-viagra?)

  2. Well, you know what they say... by jjohn · · Score: 3, Funny

    Events happen.

    I didn't want all that spam that had accumulated in my hotmail account anyway.

    1. Re:Well, you know what they say... by m00nun1t · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't get all the spam comments. Since they made changes to their spam filters a while ago (4 or 5 months ago maybe?) I've had maybe 1 spam a week in my inbox, and a few a day in my junk mail folder. I used to get dozens a day in my inbox.

      Don't like it? You run what is almost certainly the most spammed mail service in the world and do a better job.

    2. Re:Well, you know what they say... by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I use mine on Usenet posts and Slashdot. It allows people I don't know to get in touch without exposing a real address. The spam gets filtered to my junkbox, which is good. However, the "Microsoft update" virus crud (harvesting from Usenet) also goes there, and at 144k per "update" it doesn't take long to fill the freebee quota. I could have it immediately delete junkbox email, but there have been false positives. So I have to visit once a day or so to scan for real email, then flush the "updates" and the letters from PRINCE MOYO SITHOLE.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Well, you know what they say... by -noefordeg- · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a hotmail adress I use from time to time. And I can't say I have experienced much improvement in the spam-handling on my hotmail account.
      And what pisses me off, is not all the spam which do reach my inbox, but all the 'real' emails which is put in the 'Junk E-Mail' folder.

      "You run what is almost certainly the most spammed mail service in the world and do a better job."

      I don't see any relevance here.. What's the difference between one e-mail adress and another one. Or someone running an e-mail service with 100 accounts or 1 million accounts? You can still use the same filtering and software for both, just on a different scale, hardwarewise.
      As for the adresses, for a spammer they should be all the same... Or might it be that they know that hotmail adresses have poor spam filtering?

    4. Re:Well, you know what they say... by It'sYerMam · · Score: 5, Informative

      Incidentally hotmail spam is unblockable. I.E. The unrequested marketing that hotmail sends you, if you try and block the address it says you can't, so that hotmail can send you "important" information.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    5. Re:Well, you know what they say... by justkarl · · Score: 4, Funny

      Switch to Yahoo! Mail.
      Switch to pop3! Wait, is this not slashdot, where everybody has their own web/mail server in their kitchen? Why stick with the web crap, really?

    6. Re:Well, you know what they say... by athakur999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not unrequested. If you signed up for Hotmail, you agreed to get a few marketing offers. That is the price of using a free email provider instead of one that costs money.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    7. Re:Well, you know what they say... by It'sYerMam · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This is true - the same agreement that stated that they could burn the harddisk with your data on and get away with it.
      However, most ISPs would seem to give email addresses with an account, so what stops people using that is beyond me. It has the added advantage of allowing people to store as much as their hardware will allow, and you can't access hotmail via an email client, so you can't download data to back it up.
      The only way is to copy/paste it all, which is time consuming and pointless.

      Although I'm not sure, I should think that there are free email accounts that allow access via POP... Does anyone know of any?

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    8. Re:Well, you know what they say... by timeOday · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So Hotmail really does have unstoppable built-in SPAM? Wow, I didn't see that on the butterfly commercials.

    9. Re:Well, you know what they say... by fred666 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Switch to Yahoo! Mail. Switch to pop3! Wait, is this not slashdot, where everybody has their own web/mail server in their kitchen? Why stick with the web crap, really?
      RTFWebSite: Yahoo DOES provide pop3 access.
    10. Re:Well, you know what they say... by einTier · · Score: 2, Informative
      However, most ISPs would seem to give email addresses with an account, so what stops people using that is beyond me.

      Because, when you go away, your email address goes away too. My first email address was one at my university. Due to some snafu, my email account was completely deleted. When it was finally reinstated, they issued me a completely different username because I'd changed my major. As a result, there were people and friends who my only point of contact was through that address -- and I have never been able to make contact with them again.

      I encountered the problem again when I entered the workforce. As I switched jobs, the email address I'd been using dropped away into the ether, never to be seen or accessed again. If any important mails went there, I never got them. Ditto with ISPs. I switch ISPs often enough for this to be a real problem.

      So, what did I do? I got a hotmail email. No, it's not perfect, and there are many things I hate about it (especially the way it's gotten more 'Microsofty' over the years), but it's free, and I never ever have to worry about it going away or becoming inaccessable.

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
  3. Just goes to show you .... by nbvb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No matter how big, or how small, there's only one way to make sure your data is safe ....

    Back it up yourself.

    Like everything else - if you want it done right, do it yourself!

    Seriously, if you're using a service such as Yahoo! or Hotmail for important matters (whether they be family, personal, or business), make sure you make a copy of it somewhere that's in your control .......

    1. Re:Just goes to show you .... by TeraCo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't see how that will guarantee it.. accidents still happen. Tape drives fail. Hard disks get dropped into tubs of jelly, etc.

      The only way to truely secure your data is to hire a team of tibetan monks to each remember 1/5th of it. THen they can sing it back to you.

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    2. Re:Just goes to show you .... by blowdart · · Score: 3, Informative

      Outlook 2002+, or recent versions Outlook Express allow you to add Hotmail as an email provider. You can then drag and drop your folders to your local PST, and back that up.

    3. Re:Just goes to show you .... by argStyopa · · Score: 3, Informative

      PRECISELY.
      If you can't bear the idea of something being lost, it's YOUR JOB to do what's necessary to save it.

      Alexandria Felton logged on to her Hotmail account last month and was shocked to find that all of her saved files were gone.
      At stake was years' worth of personal and business correspondence, photos and the itinerary for a recently purchased trip...


      Alexandria is a moron. It's a *free* service, you get what you pay for. No backup medium is 100% reliable, but most reasonable people would consider Hotmail to be a particularly stupid place to keep important information.

      --
      -Styopa
    4. Re:Just goes to show you .... by PingvinRich · · Score: 5, Funny
      The only way to truely secure your data is to hire a team of tibetan monks to each remember 1/5th of it. Then they can sing it back to you.

      Better still, hire half a dozen and RAID them.
    5. Re:Just goes to show you .... by aslate · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hotmail Popper lets you use your favourite email program with hotmail, works fine with Thunderbird.

    6. Re:Just goes to show you .... by DrEldarion · · Score: 5, Funny

      Would that be a MONK-5 array or a a Beowolf Cloister?

    7. Re:Just goes to show you .... by ThePilgrim · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The problem is that for most people Hotmail is NOT a stupid place to keep important info.

      Its backed by Microsoft so oviously its secure.

      Just remember that most people who use Hotmail are not Geeks and they do beleave the hype.

      --
      Wouldn't it be nice if schools got all the money they wanted and the army had to hold jumble sales for guns
    8. Re:Just goes to show you .... by nacturation · · Score: 5, Funny

      Redundant Enlightened Array of Monks -- REAM them!

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    9. Re:Just goes to show you .... by shokk · · Score: 3, Informative

      Anyone running a Linux box can use hotwayd to access their Hotmail account through a POP client like Mozilla Mail. Since Mozilla has such fantastic junk mail filters, it easily gets the two or so messages that Hotmail's filter misses. I have mailing lists that I subscribed to through Hotmail, so keeping mail on their servers is not a viable option.

      However, anyone running a business on one of these services is counting on the reliability of delivery, which you might not get if you ran your own domain off a DSL line. Reliability of storage is a totally different matter. Anyone running a medium business off Hotmail accounts deserves what they get. At that point they should get serious and look into at least a server closet with UPS, partial T1, etc.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    10. Re:Just goes to show you .... by dougmc · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You'd think Microsoft would be maintaining periodic backups of Hotmail data, but what the hey.
      They probably are. But accidents still happen. Nobody can guarantee 100% reliability with any sort of backup setup. You might be able to get 99.9% reliability, and adding backup backups will get you more nines, but you'll never get 100%. And I don't see Hotmail as bringing in enough money to justify enough redundant backups to get lots and lots of nines in there.
    11. Re:Just goes to show you .... by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The stupid ones. Storage is so cheap that 1Gb of space for mail is nothing - I paid less than 60 quid for a drive 120 times than a few days ago. When drives cost less than a pound a Gb, what exactly is the advantage to using Google mail?

      And even if /.ers are drooling over it, how many would rely on it to store data vital to their life without backups elsewhere?

    12. Re:Just goes to show you .... by wizard992 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Would we always loose one monk to parity?

      Poor monk...

    13. Re:Just goes to show you .... by 1hurcoman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Reminds me of a story I heard when I worked in the data center of a oil company. Apparently, back in the days of the big mainframe, one of the techs was changing out a reel. Now keep in mind this tech was not known for being a shining star (and they kept him on to the end!). He proceeds to take the backup tape the bathroom with him, and accidently drops in the can while in there! Needless to say it cost a fortune for the company to recover the data off of the tape. After that, the running joke was when you left for the can, you were "changing out backup tapes".

    14. Re:Just goes to show you .... by joshmccormack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People like 'things that work' and are disintered in disclaimers, security, back-ups and other 'technical stuff.' So as long as things are pretty and seem to do what people want, they're happy. If something happens that people are warned about, they are angry and incredulous. Such is life in technology. If you ever want to hide sensitive information but widely desciminate it, print it in a manual or a disclaimer.

    15. Re:Just goes to show you .... by NaugaHunter · · Score: 2, Funny

      Reminds me of a hospital that had to restore from a three tape backup. It turned out that the night tech either wasn't properly trained, or was lazy, but really had no concept of the point of it all. When the system prompted "Hit return when next tape is ready>", they would just rewind the tape on the drive and hit return.

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    16. Re:Just goes to show you .... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Redundant Enlightened Array of Monks -- REAM them!

      In Soviet Russia, MEN OF THE CLOTH REAM-- no, I shouldn't say it...

  4. 'system events.' by FrivolousPig · · Score: 5, Funny

    = blue screen of death

    --
    ~ All comments automatically moderated -1 since 2004 ~
    1. Re:'system events.' by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 4, Informative
      Actually, no, they now run on 2k (IIRC) most of the time, the _Open_BSD servers are their for when the Windows one's tank.

      Oh, and 2001? isn't your article a bit dated...

      And finally This Shows that hotmail is currently under IIS5.0. I'm no microsoft troll, but as someone said, they are 'eating their own dog food' on this one.

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
  5. Why use Hotmail in the first place? by KiwiSurfer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are plenty of other places people could go to for free email, or they could use their very own ISP for email service. But for some bizzare reason people just want to have a @hotmail.com email address. I dunno, maybe it gives people a fuzzy feeling having an @hotmail.com account rather than @yourisp.com...

    1. Re:Why use Hotmail in the first place? by chocobot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      not a good idea. I switched isps 2 times this year alone, so an independent email service can give you a persistend mail address. I kept my first ever mail address all the time (gmx.com) and although my adress is on every single spam list in the world, old friends often contact me through that adress, so I cant switch!

    2. Re:Why use Hotmail in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can have an email address and servers which are totally independent of your ISP if you wish. Just pay around $30 a year to almost any domain hosting company for their basic package and you'll get email, web and ftp services, with your own domain name, for as long as you keep the domain renewed and the fees paid. You can change ISPs and even hosting companies all you like, and your domain (and therefore your email address) will always remain the same.

      No need to use those silly webmail systems either.

  6. Vs. Google by MackTK · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It will be interesting to see the final EULA for gmail and their stance on loss of data.

  7. Good riddance! by swordboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I used to have "dsg@hotmail.com" - I was one of the first users. The spam was phenomenal. I haven't looked back since dumping that one.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
  8. Honesty by FTL · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "The scariest part of the article, however, is when a spokesman for iBackup, an Internet-based backup company, disclaims,'We do not provide a 100 percent guarantee that the backup will take place' of customers' data being stored with them for a fee."

    Scary? No, that's plain honesty. Which should be respected.

    Do you honestly expect your backup provider to cover you in the event of a gamma ray burst in the stellar neighbourhood which vapourizes half the planet within 5 minutes? An extreme example to be sure, but 100% coverage is not realistic, nor is it financially desirable.

    I have no respect for any company whose sales staff claim 100% uptime or 100% reliable coverage.

    --
    Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
    1. Re:Honesty by gray+code · · Score: 5, Insightful

      no, it's not reasonable to demand that they offer 100% coverage, however, if this is a service that costs real money, then if they dick something up, it is completely reasonable to expect reasonable compensation.

    2. Re:Honesty by gregmac · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Do you honestly expect your backup provider to cover you in the event of a gamma ray burst in the stellar neighbourhood which vapourizes half the planet within 5 minutes? An extreme example to be sure, but 100% coverage is not realistic, nor is it financially desirable.

      Interesting example .. :)

      The first thing I thought of was what happens when some idiot at the client company shuts off the backup program on their side? The backup company can't do anything about it - besides maybe notice the backup didn't take place and call them - even then, say it happens on a Friday.. they're likely not going to be backed up all weekend. Office burns down, and there's an old backup.. the backup company can't be held responsible for that.

      --
      Speak before you think
    3. Re:Honesty by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have no respect for any company whose sales staff claim 100% uptime or 100% reliable coverage.

      Ummm... the ends of those sentence fragments are usually "... or your money back."

      In other words, they aren't promising 100%, just an attempt at 100% with you being compensated if it's less than that. Obviously they have a financial incentive to keep it at 100%.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    4. Re:Honesty by MmmmJoel · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "The scariest part of the article, however, is when a spokesman for iBackup, an Internet-based backup company, disclaims,'We do not provide a 100 percent guarantee that the backup will take place' of customers' data being stored with them for a fee."

      Scary? No, that's plain honesty. Which should be respected.

      Respected? No way! If it said "we can't provide a 100% guarantee that we can recover the data that we make two different off-site backups for," then I can understand. Or even, "we can only guarantee that 95% of your nighty backups will be successful" is OK.

      But the quote says they won't even guarantee it gets backed up at all! They don't even need to attempt it. It's like providing an email service and not guaranteeing that your SMTP server isn't pointing to /dev/null.
    5. Re:Honesty by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 2, Informative

      The scariest part of the article, however, is when a spokesman for iBackup, an Internet-based backup company, disclaims,'We do not provide a 100 percent guarantee that the backup will take place' of customers' data being stored with them for a fee."

      Scary? No, that's plain honesty. Which should be respected.


      You think? I'm the poster of the article and those were my exact words (though they took out my GMail question....). I think that your example is extreme: you're looking at there's no 100% guarantee of your data being safe for perpetuity. My point is that sentence lets them off the hook for ever backing up your data, much less being ever to restore it. The heck with gamma rays. What about if Johnny, Janey or Siri deletes the wrong directory? "Well, we never backed up your files...."
      That doesn't cut it. Shit happens, but that doesn't mitigate not even trying.
      You're paying for a service for them that they should be providing. Hotmail is a different story entirely (hence my 'you're getting what you pay for" line).

    6. Re:Honesty by bfg9000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The big companies don't give a damn and we're being trained to pay more for less service, or at best, greater convenience with lesser quality. Aren't backups like insurance? If you don't have a guaranteed backup what's the point? How am I supposed to sleep at night knowing I MIGHT have my files backed up? This reminds me of Ceridian, who cold called our office offering to do our payroll for us. They would cut the cheques and pay the government the taxes and send us a report, all for pennies per employee. The only problem is they wouldn't guarantee the cheques would be correct, or the taxes would actually be filed with the government -- and if the government came after me they weren't liable in any way -- we were. Needless to say we still do our own payroll.

      Take me for instance: I do a 100% guaranteed backup of the server files at work every day. I even burn them to DVD in case an EMP Blast or magnetic solar flare wipes out my hard drive backups.

      Okay okay, so I'm in the Pr0n industry... and I'm not the official backup guy... and I'm not even allowed in the Server Room... but trust me, 100% reliable backups are possible if you are dedicated enough.

      And I do it for free.

      --

      I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

  9. ibackup by grandmofftarkin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well I use ibackup and have been pretty happy with it so far. The price is good and they let you run rsync to backup your data which is not only fast but makes it easy to script automated backups from Linux.

    I'm not too worried by the comment from the ibackup spokesperson. I think they have to say this as there is always a chance of some dataloss.
    Anyway, ibackup is not the only backup I do.

  10. they have already lost some info before... by DangerSteel · · Score: 5, Funny

    like my e-mail address to every known spammer in the universe. Hell, I'm getting e-mails to enlarge my tentacles and re-grow my third eye through Hotmail...

  11. hotmail worth every penny payed by mpost4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would say the people who losted there data, got their moneys worth. not to say that the data was unimportant, but really do you want to trust your data to a "free" service?????????

  12. Backing up IMAP email? by KiwiSurfer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It would also be interesting to look at the paid email providers too. Does the ISPs that offer IMAP hosting do backups of their customer's emails? I quite like the idea of IMAP, but this issue raises an interesting question. With POP3 email, your emails are stored on your own computer, so you can easily backup email. How easy is it to backup and restore IMAP email boxes?

    1. Re:Backing up IMAP email? by reidbold · · Score: 4, Informative

      Pretty easy.

      Thunderbird->Tools->Offline & Disk Space->Make the messages in my Inbox available when I am working offline (check).

      Then feel free to back up the local files as you please.

      Bonus points for saying 'raises an interesting question' rather than 'begs the question'.

      --
      -Reid
  13. Wow thanks I still have all my Hotmail spam! by Numeric · · Score: 5, Funny

    I had to double check my hotmail.com account after reading this alarming post. I was happy to find all my spam still in my account! Thank you to all the Hotmail.com admins.

    --
    -- ladies and gentlemen we are floating in space!
  14. who would store this sort of info on hotmail ? by cipher+uk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At stake was years' worth of personal and business correspondence, photos and the itinerary for a recently purchased trip

    why would someone store such important info on hotmail ? The notices saying they can't garentee your data won't disappear isn't there for PR. Its obvious things like this can happen so why not store it on something like a floppy. I mean hotmail doesn't even give you a lot of space. I haven't used it for a while but isn't it 3mb ? At least it was a free account and not one where he was paying for extra storage. That would have made it a hell of a lot worse if he was paying for the service.

  15. Scary? by Rufus88 · · Score: 5, Insightful


    The scariest part of the article, however, is when a spokesman for iBackup, an Internet-based backup company, disclaims,'We do not provide a 100 percent guarantee that the backup will take place' of customers' data being stored with them for a fee."

    Duh. There are no 100% guarantees of anything in life. The only significance of any "guarantee" is the recourse the company gives you (e.g. your money back) if they fail to live up to it.There's no guarantee that your in-house backup system won't eat your data. There's no guarantee your brand new car won't explode. There's no guarantee that FedEx will absolutely, positively, not lose your package, let alone get it there overnight.

    1. Re:Scary? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It reads to me that iBackup don't even guarantee that they will even back it up AT ALL. OK I grant that backups can fail, but not backing up at all is pretty sad for a service that has "backup" in its company name! Sounds to me to be a bunch of retards.

      At least with FedEx, they will compensate you if they lose the package, provided you declared a value. I think $100 coverage is free with the shipment.

  16. No guarantee by pubjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "'We do not provide a 100 percent guarantee that the backup will take place' of customers' data being stored with them for a fee."

    If they promote themselves as providing a backup service then it probably doesn't matter if they say they don't guarantee it in the fine print. They would almost certainly be legally liable for failure to provide the service as advertised if they didn't provide that service. There are legal customer rights which companies you can't get round, forunately. (At least in Europe, but I suspect it is the same in the USA).

  17. Seems fair to me. by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 3, Insightful

    100% doesn't exist in the real world. In the real world there are media errors, drive failures, network failures, administration errors, power outages, disasters etc etc etc.

    Go tell your system vendor that you want guaranteed 100% service and watch his beeming grin appear.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    1. Re:Seems fair to me. by GregChant · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the real world, yes, 100% does exist. Several of our systems here at work are guarenteed to be up 100% of the time, and 100% of our data backed up for a rollback period of a month (meaning we can roll back the server to any day in the past month in case of a disaster)

      So how is this possible? Easy; have a competent IT staff. A monkey can administer a properly working backup system, and if you want to stay in the managed hosting business, a working backup system is absolutely essential. Obviously there's no way those systems can be up 100% of the time, but that's not the point. The point is that 100% of the time, you are getting the maximum utilization and productivity off of the service.

      What happens when a server goes down? Well, the same things that happen in unguarenteed services, but with one exception: we get compensated. As per our contract, we get paid a flat fee for every minute we cannot use our system in its normal capacity. This is the essence of any business guarentee: they aren't saying they'll be up all the time, they are saying that if the off chance of a downtime does occur, you will be properly compensated.

  18. I was out of the country for 8 months... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    and I had two personal hotmail accounts. Since I was on business and in a region were some of what was written in my email would be considered offensive and trust me, my life would have been put into jeopardy so I left the accounts alone. When I got back to the States, I had found that MS purged my two accounts. Nice, huh? When I emailed them, they said, "Too bad, so sad. If you don't access your account every 60days or whatever it is, you loose, f-off."

    Don't use MS products or services if you don't have too. It's not cause I think they suck, it's because they don't care. It's as simple as that.

    1. Re:I was out of the country for 8 months... by ideatrack · · Score: 3

      So...you didn't read the agreement, it came back to bite you, and this is just because Microsoft is evil?

      Imagine if they left all the idle accounts alone and just let them accumulate SPAM or whatever. That's hardly good system policy.

      However evil Microsoft may or may not be, you cannot really use them as an answer to your own ignorance.

  19. Second account for backup by gweihir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why not forward all email to a second account with a different provider for backup?

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Second account for backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hotmail forwarding is intentionally very weak.

      You can only forward one message at a time.

      It is designed to keep you and your data captive.

      So, migrating many messages off would be very time consuming. It recently became even worse when they shifted the 'view mail' function to javascript. Now you can only open one window to your mbox at a time (vs. multiple windows with multiple messages, etc).

  20. Hotmail Mares by sheeny · · Score: 5, Informative


    I also had a nightmare at one stage with Hotmail. I logged on one day and everything in sent items was gone. It was due to 'changes in service'. I was not amused and of course there is no way one can actually contact Hotmail - hell I don't know where this woman found their number! I'm impressed.

    Needless to say I changed provider which is also free and gives me 6Mb instead of 2 (mail.vu).

  21. Why would they? by stevens · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why would iBackup offer it? For some reason, software makers (myself included) have been able to get away without guaranteeing anything for a long time. We don't finish projects sometimes, and even if we do, we don't guarantee you even get what you want.

    What is interesting, mind you, is that some consider this more realistic. The way Product Liability cases have been going the last 50 years, software is kind of lucky not to be included. Think of the awards for McDonalds coffee 'users;' people who eat glass and complain there was no sticker saying not to.

    If we demand courts throw away the disclaimers of liability by companies like iBackup or Microsoft, it could definitely hurt open source. If they throw out Windows' disclaimers of liability the GPL's disclaimer might not be far off. What if people could sue free software authors directly? That would be scary.

    It's a double-edged sword, and frankly, I don't know which way I'd like it to go. Anyone?

    1. Re:Why would they? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Another thought:

      Say a law was passed such that the liability would be limited to the amount paid for the software, unless otherwise agreed, like insurance or a special additional paid support package giving greater liabilities.

      Would that make you happy?

    2. Re:Why would they? by praksys · · Score: 3, Interesting
      What if people could sue free software authors directly? That would be scary.

      No kidding. Consider how thoroughly medical proffessionals have been ass-fucked by lawyers...
      How much does medical liability insurance cost? A. Insurance premiums for emergency physicians grew on average by more than 50 percent from 2002 to 2003 to $53,500 (AMA 2003), with some paying more than $100,000 annually. Other medical specialists, such as neurosurgeons and OB-GYNs pay $200,000 to $300,000 annually.
      ...and be thanful it hasn't happened the IT industry - yet. Most doctors would be better off being taxed by the mafia than having to pay this lawyer tax.
  22. Nothing is 100% secure.. by Genoxide · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, I guess it was bound to happen some time! Even with failover solutions, backups, mirrors and whatnot.. Statistically something at some point is bound to go wrong. Be it a combination of human error, hardware failure, bad luck, the world ending, you name it. There will almost certainly always be a combination of things that are near impossible to protect against..

    Same thing with Ibackup. Imagine if they promised with 100% certainty that your data was safe, and something occured that killed your data. I can imagine the lawsuits!! They would kill that firm first time it happens.

    But still.. Instead of saying that you can't provide 100% certainty of backup it would be better to say that you provide 99.99999999956% certainty.. It's still not 100% but it sounds a whole lot better! :)

  23. Always A Risk by blueZhift · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sadly, data loss is always a risk no matter what you pay. The only thing you can do is take actions to minimize any potential loss. Given that, this really isn't news.

    Obligatory /. Fan Service: Oh, but this is Microsoft Hotmail! I'm outraged! Damn EULA!!

    That feels so much better!

  24. Its a consistant address by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With the way people move from their ISP from service to service, its nice to have a consistent email address as you float around.

    True, you could just get your own domain and be done with it, but for the average Joe that may not fully comprehend the options, its not worth the expense nor the extra troubles..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Its a consistant address by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 2, Informative

      With the way people move from their ISP from service to service, its nice to have a consistent email address as you float around.

      But why use Hotmail? There are other, better free mail services out there.

      Fastmail.FM is a good one--pretty reliable, and it even has free IMAP access. You have to provide your own SMTP server tho, if you don't want to pay Fastmail.FM for one--but that's ok...I don't know of an ISP that doesn't provide for one, anyway.

      Its web-based interface is also pretty sweet--it's very sleek and minimalist (far more than Hotmail or Yahoo), and you have a choice of style sheets to choose from. You can even upload your own CSS if you don't like any of the pre-made ones.

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
  25. From the article: by fuzzix · · Score: 3, Interesting
    "At stake was years' worth of personal and business correspondence, photos and the itinerary for a recently purchased trip, the San Jose, Calif., health care worker said." (my emphasis)
    Isn't there a clause in Hotmail's AUP/TOS/Whatever that it cannot be used for any business purpose? I guess this SNAFU is the reason for that clause - If they could be held liable for loss of earnings then *poof* goes any economical reason for a free service.
    I have a hotmail account myself because some of my friends use MSN messenger (I use Gaim myself- find me on Yahoo, ICQ, MSN and of course, Jabber). Glad I never actually employed this mail account for mail purposes...
    Do other services have a "no business use" type disclaimer? Is Google liable if they chuck out 800MB of your GMail?
  26. PFFT! by chrome · · Score: 2, Funny

    Any geek worth his salt has his own mailserver running a custom distribution with his own webmail over SSL, IMAP etc access and half a terabyte of storage. Hotmail! PFFT!

    Besides, who cares if Hotmail loses data. I lose data all the time. I don't get upset. Why should I get upset if my email provider loses some worthless mail. Anything important, I make a couple of copies and keep them around on CD, encrypted of course!

  27. Guarantee = money by Jammer@CMH · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Yes there is, there are plenty of 100% guarantees. "We guarantee that we will provide service X, with quality of service Y. If we fail, you are entitled to financial compensation Z by the terms of this guarantee."

    That is a 100% guarantee, but is not unlimited liability. Unlimited liability (in case of failure) is not something any business is eager to provide.

  28. and it continues... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well,

    I thing that 'system events' may happen with any service provider, but because it happened to a MS related company, that's why it's being trumpeted on /.

  29. Happened to me by dFaust · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Over the past few weeks, Hotmail has been continuously deleting a set of about 60 emails out of my Inbox (yes, it needed cleaned out anyways, but that probably wasn't the way to go about doing it). Thankfully, I check my email enough that said emails are still in the trash and I can manually retrieve them.

    While I've exported my important email to Thunderbird, I still have plenty of non-crucial stuff in Hotmail. It wouldn't have been the end of the world had the files been deleted, but it was pretty disconcerting none-the-less.

    I finally sent them an email explaining the problem and my annoyance. I recieved a form e-mail saying I would get a response within 24 hours.... which I didn't. Though all my e-mails have stayed intact so far... but it's only been a few days. If the problem doesn't come back, it seems to imply the problem is fixable.

  30. The Slashdot bias strikes again... by Mitleid · · Score: 2

    You know, computers are pretty cranky devices when they aren't already complicated even more by shoddy software, so it's only inevitable that data loss will eventually occur. No manner of human storage is completely and 100% reliable, regardless of whether or not you are paying for a service.

    Yeah, it's a damn shame that some user's info was lost. And it's even more a shame that it looks like it was some of them who were paying for it. But anyone who honestly puts complete faith in a human-devised storage system (computer-based or not), has got to get a grip on reality. Microsoft fucked up, some data was lost. It happens, and it can happen to anybody.

    If you're gonna pelt Microsoft with criticism, aim for where it belongs. The fact that and manner in which this news was posted to slashdot just comes off as a desperate hit below the belt.

    --

    --
    Is it me, or did it just get fatter in here?
    1. Re:The Slashdot bias strikes again... by Paulrothrock · · Score: 2

      As much as I loathe M$, I'm going to have to agree. Apple's .Mac was down for a while, and people were cheesed. Nothing on /. A little bias is okay when they do stupid things (like patent the double-click), but this could happen to anybody. But I do think they should be a little forthcoming as to what the 'system event' is. Was it a hack? Was it a drive error? That would alleviate some of the flack they're taking for this.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  31. If it's worth keeping its worth backing up by blackest_k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    with the price of the usb keyrings being so cheap surely its worth saving your email onto one of them where ever you go in the world?
    The true value of hotmail is your email account is accessable anywhere.

    Why not an Isp email account ?
    How often do you change providers?

    Myself I have had accounts with
    demon, fci, virgin, bt, NTL tiscali...
    If you use the ISP's email services you have to migrate your email account a pain in the ...

    for me far worse than Hotmail is Outlook Express.
    Downloaded Email from hotmail to my PC.
    deleted my Email from my hotmail account.
    (regaining the space to recieve new messages).
    15 Minutes later my Pc logs itself into hotmail and sync's outlook express with my hotmail account.
    DELETING my unread mail from my PC.

    Is it wrong to think that hotmail is the postbox where i collect my mail and when I want to sync my mail I mean get any mail from the hotmail server that isn't already on my Pc so I can read it off line?

    I am sure everyone keeps all their important mail on the mat behind the front door and any mail anywhere else, such as your desk is unimportant and should go in the trash.

    I think thats when I really started to hate Microsoft.

    John.

  32. "System events" ? by Jesrad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now that is a lie by omission if I ever saw one. Was it a hardware failure ? A software failure ? An operator mistake ? An external attack ? A natural catastrophe ?

    Of course no one can guarantee a 100% rate of security. In commercial aerial transport the norm is one incident in a million of movements, it'd be nice if the same rate was enforced in IT as a general rule.

    --
    Maybe we deserve this world ?
  33. netscape.net email by rwa2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My netscape mail has been completely cleaned out at least twice already, including all of my folders. Anyone else have this experience there? I mainly use it as my junk/product mail address, so I only check it, like, once a month or so... maybe that's a factor?

    In the mean time, I've been changing my junk/product mail to yahoo.com, since I can download it into my maildir using fetchyahoo.pl . That way, at least it goes through their spam filters once before going through my local spamassasin daemon.

    Netscape's webmail also really sucked in that you could only delete spam a pageful of 25 at a time :P

    Just so that I'm marginally on topic, I've been able to avoid hotmail ever since they got bought by MS way back when. I take it this data loss means they finally succeeded in migrating from FreeBSD to Win** Server? :P

  34. poor != moron by br3itain · · Score: 5, Insightful
    A little wake-up call to the self-satisfied middle class types out there who can't fathom not owning a computer - there are a *lot* of people who can't afford their own PC, let alone subscribe to an ISP. They depend on free access in public libraries for their email (and free internet email accounts like Hotmail). It's pretty hard to back up your emails in that case (many libraries ban the use of floppy disks outright).

    Yes, you get what you pay for, but when something like this happens it doesn't necessarily mean the individual is a moron, it means she can't afford anything else.

    1. Re:poor != moron by kotj.mf · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Too true. The administration at the large public library where I used to work seemed to view the underpriveledged types who would conduct most of their computing on our Wyse terminals more as unwelcome burdens than as "real" patrons.

      These are people who needed to do simple stuff like type out a resume, write a two page book report for school, or whatever. I spent the better part of a year trying to persuade IS to put OpenOffice on a couple of unused PCs we had sitting around, and their response was, essentially, "Microsoft rulez! OOo droolz!"

      "So are we going to put MS Office on the PCs for the public instead?"

      "No, we can't afford the licenses."

      I actually took my case all the way up to administration, and they as much as told me "We're a library, not a community center. They're lucky we don't block Hotmail."

      Shit, they even locked the floppy drives on the few actual PCs (rather than Winterms) we had available for the public, to keep people from saving anything.

      All this from one of the largest, and supposedly best, public library systems in the country.

      I ended up writing a little PHP script that'll spit out either a preformatted resume or a simple letter-type html page and let you print them out from a browser. Took me an hour, and that was mostly getting the tables right for the resumes. The patrons, my immediate boss, and all of my co-workers were thrilled, but all I got from administration was a warning that I shouldn't have developed the app on company time.

      Fuckers.

      Hotmail, Yahoo, et al provide valuable services to people who couldn't otherwise get them.

      Yeah, the corporations behind the services are only doing it to make a buck.

      Yeah, they're free, and you get what you pay for.

      Yeah, anybody who should know better, and could afford better, who does *anything* critical with Hotmail is an idiot.

      But for some people, something is better than nothing.

      --
      hang brain.
    2. Re:poor != moron by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bah, sophistry.

      If reliability was an issue, even FREE services can be used to provide a level of redundancy higher than burned media.

      Yahoo Mail
      Hotmail
      123Mail
      heck, I think even Marijuana.com offers a free webmail account.

      Poor people aren't morons, but they may have to actually deal with their situation instead of demanding that the world do so for them.

      When I *was* poor and had to rely on the bus or a crappy unreliable car (for example) I simply had to cope with the potential unreliability of my ride by having backup plans. It was a simple fact of my lack of resources, and a good motivator for me to change my condition.

      --
      -Styopa
    3. Re:poor != moron by joshmccormack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's great that you helped out like that, and really, really sad about the administrations attitude. Who do you they think uses the computers? Maybe kids who are doing papers or something... I don't know.

      A computer is increasingly a requirement if you want to find a job or communicate at a professional level. And in a lot of ways, libraries are community centers - you can often take free classes, get tax advice, there are entertaining things for kids, etc.

      Running a resource hungry MS operating system just so people can use a browser is a horrible waste of money. Just from the hardware perspective, it's way too expensive. Taking the software into account it gets really crazy.

    4. Re:poor != moron by kotj.mf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've kinda got a feeling that the administration's attitude was, at least somewhat, a product of some of the more recalcitrant desk staff.

      You know how there's always some old codger who still bitches about getting rid of the card catalog ten years ago? Well those people also get *jobs* at the library. And since they tend to have worked there for awhile, they're in a better position to influence policy.

      And *they* are the ones who get scared/annoyed/confused when they have to show somebody how to sign up for a Hotmail account or clear a printer queue.

      I valued the experience and breadth of knowledge of the librarians who had worked there for multiple decades; in-depth knowledge of the physical collection is always going to be a critical part of any serious library. But that experience doesn't automically confer the ability to judge the needs of the community, or the ability to evaluate how technology can be put to use to serve those needs.

      Mind you, I'm one of those people who much preferred to work on the old AS/400 system than the new MS SQL/IIS/web-based catalog they're in the middle of implementing now, but that's because I'm in a position to know what sucks and what doesn't.

      My wife still works there; otherwise, I'd have made a bigger stink about it on my way out, and maybe contacted some of my pals at the local muckraking indy paper. They were and are in the middle of the worst budget crunch in their history, and are still merrily sinking millions into a halfassed upgrade that won't really improve the quality of the service.

      First, we fire all the MCSE's....

      --
      hang brain.
  35. No company will guarentee 100% by Servo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm in the professional backup/storage management field and can tell you this... NOBODY will give you better than 99.9% reliability guarentee. There are far too many things to break that no matter what, you are likely to either miss something due to a general outage or have a tape/disk go bad.

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  36. Re:110% by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Of course 110% isn't enough, now *everyone* gives 110% and we now have to give 120%, 200%, 1000%!

    But naturally nobody wants to pay 120%, 200%, 1000%...

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  37. How is this news? by jonadab · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've known that hotmail occasionally loses mail since... well, since before
    they switched the hotmail servers over to NT, anyway. I wouldn't have expected
    it to change since then, particularly since it's a free service. In other news,
    Yahoo! mail occasionally has quite significant delays (several hours or more)
    when sending or receiving, and some messages can get delayed a lot more than
    others so that mail arrives out-of-order (which can be really weird if you're
    on a mailing list).

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  38. Very common by nonameisgood · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1) people on shared computers
    2) people with no computer of thier own
    3) people who want access to the information from multiple computer or while away from thier own
    Which includes many of the following:
    a) college students
    b) the poor
    c) business people working at many locations and away from a fixed site (note that many networks previously used for internet access are now closed to personal laptops)
    d) travellers using internet cafes during a trip

    --
    Faith is the very antithesis of reason, injudiciousness a critical component of spiritual devotion. Jon Krakauer
  39. Re:Events happen? Events happen? by coolfrood · · Score: 4, Funny

    It was like.. beep, beep, beep, and all my events were gone. Then I had to do the event again, and it wasn't as good. It was... a bummer.

  40. Hey. Don't think! by Pedrito · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From the article: "It's scary," Felton said. "These services are easy and free, so people don't even think about using them."

    Well, there you go. That's what happens when you don't think.

  41. Nonsense by Otto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My point is that sentence lets them off the hook for ever backing up your data, much less being ever to restore it.

    Nothing personal, but this is total fucking nonsense.

    It's a throw away line by one guy at the company. It's not a contract or definitive statement of policy. It's just one guy being honest. They *can't* provide 100% guaranteed reliability. NOBODY can provide 100% guaranteed reliability. You cannot predict the future.

    They may do everything in their power to ensure that your data is available, but they cannot guarantee that it always will be every time no matter what. That's impossible. And that's all the guy is really stating here. If you somehow read it as "well, it's impossible, so we don't even try" then you're reading a hell of a lot more into it than is actually there.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  42. This is why I don't use other online applications by Riturno · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have looked at online applications for small businesses, including accounting, data storage, and CRM, but primary thing amoung many concerns is data loss. While Hotmail is not a business service, the comments from iBackup make me very wary about the responsibility of these types of companies for their customers' data.

  43. But Gmail is still evil? by Autumnmist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh horrors! Gmail might have extra copies of your data because they BACKED IT UP! They're evil!

    Hotmail just lost your data because their backup was none too effective!

    Does anyone else see the dichotomy here?

    --
    --- "Many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view." ~ Ben Kenobi, 'Return of the Jedi'
  44. Backups by phorm · · Score: 2, Informative

    Many internet cafe's will - for a small fee - burn you a CD of your data. Of course, for hotmail you would have to paste your emails into word, notepad, whatever - but many of the less-computer-literate type have mastered the copy+paste functions.

    It's a pain in the butt, but for some better than losing any "important" data.

  45. I lost a month's worth on Hotmail by LookSharp · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use hotmail as a "catchall" for people and companies that send me crap. I also use it to read POP mail at work. For $19.95 a year, it seemed like a good bargain. I always swore I would never keep anything there that was "valuable," because I knew MS would never guarantee availability.

    What ended up happening is that I was in the middle of an ISP migration, and used Hotmail on March 30th to download all my remaining POP messages that I kept stored (e.g. important or frequently-accessed messages) on my ISP's server before my account was deactivited. Typically I would then go home and import that mail from Hotmail into a local mail file. What actually happened was I got busy for a couple of days, and when I logged in on 4/1 (April fool's day!) I had an empty Hotmail box.

    I complained and got a form letter response a couple of days later, saying they hoped I understood, but they had experienced a system "event" and were working to restore data. Anything not restored within 72 hours would not be recovered. Thank you for understanding.

    I never got a single message back. Fortunately, none of the info I lost was business-related, only family and event planning data, but it goes to show what MS gives you, even when you PAY for service.

  46. I used to use hotmail... by josepha48 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    .. then the same thing happened to me.. at the time that Microsoft took over hotmail, they shortly there after started tinkering with the system to 'make it better'. In doing so they lost some of my email. I emailed their support and they said 'sorry' essentially. So I did the only thing I could. I switched to using yahoo email and have not lost a single email since.

    Its not that I hate Microsoft, its that I just don't trust them with my data.

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!
    Does slashdot hate my posts?