Slashdot Mirror


Is Your Computer Leaking Toxic Dust?

n0alpha writes "A recent study by scientists at the University of Washington suggests that computers emit dangerous chemicals. Specifically, chemicals called PBDEs (poly-brominated-diphyenyl ethers) found in the household dust that collects on your monitor and keyboard could pose a health threat. Scientists say the chemicals have caused developmental and learning defects in laboratory animals and may pose a threat to people and animals. 'It's critical we phase these materials out,' said Suellen Mele, Citizens for Resource Conservation. And some companies are doing just that."

74 of 372 comments (clear)

  1. 'dats a rhetorical question... by grub · · Score: 3, Interesting


    Is Your Computer Leaking Toxic Dust?

    Being that they found these toxins on every computer sampled... As an aside, does anyone know what causes "New Computer Smell"? Obviously chemicals but what ones?

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:'dats a rhetorical question... by ElScorcho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know about you, but the on;y
      new computer smell' I get is from NewEgg's packing materials. If you're referring to something like what a new Dell smells like, I have no idea. If it's anything like a car's new smell it's probably some volatile compounds left over from the plastic manufacturing.

      --
      Evil will always win, because Good is DUMB
    2. Re:'dats a rhetorical question... by Paulrothrock · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've noticed that new Mac smell is totally different from new PC smell. If I sniff close to the exhuast fan on my Powerbook I can still get a wiff. Now THAT gets me hot.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    3. Re:'dats a rhetorical question... by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Generally the new electronics smell is caused by either volatile compounds left from the plastic manufacturing process or the burning of solder flux on the heated solder joints.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:'dats a rhetorical question... by Cruciform · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you know the contents of solder resin/rosin, I'd bet that that is your culprit.

      I like that smell. But maybe it's just because the brain cells it kills cause my brain to release pleasure stimulating endorphins.

    5. Re:'dats a rhetorical question... by EaterOfDog · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's the smell of victory!

      --

      Crushing my karma one post at a time.
    6. Re:'dats a rhetorical question... by RasTafarii · · Score: 2, Informative

      the quantities of deca-BDE found were in the ~TRILLIONTHS of a gram [~100 picograms/cm2].

      to make mice have neurological symptoms, they had to dose them with .8 MILLIGRAMS/kilo of bodyweight, a quantity billions of times higher...

      see:

      http://www.computertakeback.com/docUploads/bfr_r ep ort.pdf?CFID=4748427&CFTOKEN=85189172

      --

      "...can you imagine a BEOWULF CLUSTER of these? That'd be some serious power!"

    7. Re:'dats a rhetorical question... by nomadic · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've noticed that new Mac smell is totally different from new PC smell. If I sniff close to the exhuast fan on my Powerbook I can still get a wiff.

      Mmmm, blueberry.

  2. I tire of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    no matter what you have and/or do, it will kill you, don't run in front of a speeding truck. no parasute free skydiving, now bungey jumping with only twine. now this.

  3. *sigh* by lordkuri · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ya know what... this is going to be another email chain letter... nimby's going ape over the "new killer problem omg!!!" for the next 3 months.

    people... *life* is dangerous... deal with it

    1. Re:*sigh* by trentblase · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, but it's good to calculate your risks. Some things ARE more dangerous than others. I'm glad they "phased out" asbestos, for example. (In new construction at least)

    2. Re:*sigh* by lordkuri · · Score: 2, Funny

      I agree with your sentiment... we *should* get rid of these things... moreover just venting about the sheeplike mentality of the general public

    3. Re:*sigh* by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately for us, in the US at least, we have become overly obsessed with germs and germ fighting. Everything you see kills 99.9% of bacteria!

      Soon we will be bathing in extra strength bleach, drinking pool water (we basically do), and using disposable/burnable everything.

      The more that we try to "fight" bacteria the more our civilization becomes prone to simple infection.

    4. Re:*sigh* by Big+Nothing · · Score: 3, Interesting

      BDE is not a bacteria or germ or anything of that sorts - it's a highly toxic chemical, much like PCB or DDT. The volume in each computer is not really a health risk to _you_ (unless you are a small child or a pregnant woman), but the accumulation of BDE in nature is an environmental danger that should be addressed.

      --
      SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    5. Re:*sigh* by mwood · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yah, now I'm gonna have to stop collecting all that dust and eating it for breakfast. Why can't they make computers without any chemicals in them?

      Oh!

    6. Re:*sigh* by surprise_audit · · Score: 3, Insightful
      There's an EPA study that links chlorine to cancer too, so bathing in bleach or drinking pool water exposes you to a carcinogen. Same with regular tap water, of course.

      You have to weigh the risks, though. Peru took that study to heart and stopped chlorinating their tap water, thereby saving an estimated 180 people out of a population of 18,000,000. The result? 600,000 cases of cholera with 4,000 deaths. It's not limited to Peru, either. The epidemic spread through Latin America and in a 6 year period there were more than 1.3 million cases and over 11,000 deaths.

  4. I'm glad... by Cytlid · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...I stopped licking my keyboard when I was 16.

    --
    FLR
    1. Re:I'm glad... by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...I stopped licking my keyboard when I was 16.

      Then you obviously need to update your porn.

  5. Death.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, I guess my computer WILL be the death of me ; ;

  6. Yeah right... by Your_Mom · · Score: 4, Funny

    Like I could develop a learning disability from chemicals leaking from my... uh... thingamjig...

    Crap....

    --
    Objects in the blog are closer then they ap
    1. Re:Yeah right... by phorm · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've heard that if yours "thingamjig" leaks too often you can go blind...

  7. As an added note by Throtex · · Score: 2, Funny

    Today's date is most definitely NOT April 1st.

    That being said...

    RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!!!

  8. Dangerous by muttoj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Reading this post is bad for my eyes. Going to the toilet to often can give me RSI and serious backproblems. Eating wears out my jawbones. Everything is bad for you if you sart thinking about it. Everything dangerous is called life.

    1. Re:Dangerous by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 3, Funny

      And people said I was mad for wearing a NBC-protection suit when working with a computer! Now who's mad now! Nahahahahahah!

  9. glow by pbrinich · · Score: 3, Funny

    You mean that neon green glow coming from the back of my case is not healthy?

    Toxic, it's such a harsh word, how about "Not encouraging to one's health"

  10. In RTFA, I saw that... by Dagny+Taggert · · Score: 4, Insightful

    they also mentioned that these compounds are found on many electronic devices. Let's just suppose, for the sake of argument, that this dust shortens your life span by 10-15 years. Are we willing to change our lives radically (go back to 19th century living) in order to live longer? Or will we just deal with it as a cost of progress? Like an earlier poster said, everything kills you.

    --
    Don't be a looter...and yes, I know that it's spelled with an "A" instead of an "E".
    1. Re:In RTFA, I saw that... by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How about using decent ventilation? Any electronic device contains materials that are very unhealty. But I doubt any of that would be really such a hazard if you'd provide sufficent ventilation and occationaly use a vacuum cleaner in the way they were intended to use.
      Just look at what a single factory dumps in the air. I'd be more worried about that.

    2. Re:In RTFA, I saw that... by ishark · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, the article says that there are 150+ other compounds which can act as fire retardant, so it's just a matter of choosing another one instead of disposing of all the electronics equipment.....

    3. Re:In RTFA, I saw that... by chriso11 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, if after a scientific process, it is determined that the chemicals are toxic, then what is your proposal? Dump mecury over the ocean so everything is dead?

      In case you don't realize, not everything needs to be made of plastic. There was once this material called 'metal' (pronounced me' tal). Many metals are quite fire resistant. Computers, keyboards, and mice could easily be made of such a material.

      --
      No, I don't trust in god. He'll have to pay up front, like everybody else.
    4. Re:In RTFA, I saw that... by shepd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >There was once this material called 'metal' (pronounced me' tal).

      Yes, quite tasty metals, such as lead, aluminum, and cadmium.

      Can I be the first to have that cool mercury trackball?

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    5. Re:In RTFA, I saw that... by Dogtanian · · Score: 2, Informative

      In case you don't realize, not everything needs to be made of plastic. There was once this material called 'metal' (pronounced me' tal). Many metals are quite fire resistant. Computers, keyboards, and mice could easily be made of such a material.

      They could be made from such a material. Not 'easily', though. Not in the sense that they can be made 'easily' with moulded plastic.

      And not inexpensively. Personally, I think modern plastics are *way* underrated for the quality of life they've given us. This isn't an attempt to justify the worst excesses of our modern consumer society- our plastic 'supply' is no more infinite than the petrochemicals required to make it, and we should have our eye towards more recycling. For all that, I'd rather try to deal sensibly with the problems plastics cause than engage in some reactionary and ultimately counter-productive reversion to 'natural' materials.

      I'd be interested in finding out how good a computer we could build with 'natural' materials and no plastics. Not something with the power of anything approaching a PC I'd bet, and even with mass production, probably hideously expensive.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  11. Legislation by Big+Nothing · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here in Sweden the PBDEs are already banned through legislation, and I think the entire EU is on the way towords a ban as well.

    --
    SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    1. Re:Legislation by Big+Nothing · · Score: 5, Informative

      After some research, I can provide some more informations without totally talking out of my ass:

      Penta- and octa-BDE (PBDE and OBDE) are the most toxic and will be banned in the entire EU come august (not yet banned here in Sweden, sorry for the irresponsible, blatant lie).

      Deca-BDE will not be banned in EU yet, but Sweden is working on getting a national ban (and trying to get EU to ban DBDE as well).

      I sit corrected.

      --
      SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
  12. In other news... by AbbyNormal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Sky is Falling! The Sky is Falling!
    Seriously, every week we hear about the risks of eating too many carbs and then studies proving otherwise. We hear about why we should buy this and do that. Now we'll start hearing about new improved "Air filters" that remove the new threat of "PBDE"...Only four monthly payments of $69.99! These companies will start cropping up, the moment this story hits the local news channels.

    Its kind of sad, but I don't trust most funded scientific studies anymore, they all seem out to snatch our dollar for some other ulterior motive.

    --
    Sig it.
    1. Re:In other news... by tsg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Maybe, but I can't imagine anyone ever coming back in a couple of years and saying these chemicals are good for us.

      As far as I can tell, nobody can really tell for sure that they are bad for us now. I haven't been able to find any health effects on humans, and the studies I have found are limited to lab mice and don't appear to be conclusive (IANA biologist). If someone could point me towards something a little more conclusive I would appreciate it.

      I'm not saying there definitely isn't a problem, but at the very least it looks like we need more research. There's enough bad science going on now to make me skeptical of any health warnings printed in major news media, and the article takes it as a given that PDBE's are toxic to humans while only really reporting that they are present in computers.

      --
      People's desire to believe they are right is much stronger than their desire to be right.
    2. Re:In other news... by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As far as I can tell, nobody can really tell for sure that they are bad for us now. I haven't been able to find any health effects on humans, and the studies I have found are limited to lab mice...

      One of the biggest problems with such studies is that they don't know how they "scale down". For example, if 100 exposure units causes a loss of 10 IQ points, does that mean that 10 units causes a loss of 1 IQ point?

      Some toxins scale down linearly and some bottom out quickly and don't seem to cause detectable problems at low levels. Then again, lowering the IQ of every citizen by 0.1 percent is still not a good thing. And, combinations of toxins from different sources may cause problems that they would not in isolation.

      It is very expensive to test rats at low levels because you need huge numbers of rats and lots of time to detect small differences in their health or behavior. Thus, they usually use a smaller number with higher doses.

      It is a messy grey art. Even peanut butter and other "natural" substances have been found to cause cancer in rats in high doses. Whether peanut butter is causing cancer in humans also is unknown. Most natural foods probably have various toxins it that our bodies simply cope with by living with some amount of degeneration. Then again, human bodies originally only lived to around 40 years. If we live longer, than such toxins may pose more problems.

      Enjoy your sandwich :-)

  13. It's true!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you snort two or three tons of this stuff, over the period of a few days, it will kill you!

    Think of the children!!

    1. Re:It's true!!!! by harrkev · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know that you are trying to be funny, but my budget allows me $1000 to build a new computer in the next couple of months (big news for me, since I use a Celeron 466 at home). I also have two small children at home -- a three-year-old and a two-year-old, and I love them very much and want them to be healthy.

      What I want to know is if the "dust" is left on the item from manufacture, or if the "dust" is regular houshold dust which leeches chemicals from any exposed surface. The first one you can hope to clean off, the second one you can't. I did read a version of the article linked from the Yahoo new site (not sure how different it is from the article mentioned here). But in the article that I read, they just found dust, and apparently made no effort to determine the source, or if cleaning a new computer would help.

      And if chemicals are being emitted by every available surface, are any airborne, or do they need a carrier such as dust in order to travel?

      If the resudue can be cleaned off of the parts, what is a safe cleaner to use on a motherboard?

      At least I am glad that I have already decided on an Antec server case which has air filters over the intake fans in the front. If I do find a way to clean off the mobo and other internal electronics, then I might be able to keep dust off of the inside of the case.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    2. Re:It's true!!!! by harrkev · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Think of life an a game of russian roulette with over 1000 chambers and one bullet. I will freely admit that chemicals from electronics is a minor issue. But enough minor issues added together amount to a major issue. Life is not safe, and there are many things that I cannot control. But if there is something that I CAN control, then I would be a fool for not doing it. I am not saying that I am going to throw out my computer. I am just saying that if I can swab my mobo and processor with alcohol wipes first and help protect the health of my family, then it may be worth the effort.

      Secondly the "chemicals may be emitted" phrase IS valid. Have you ever heard of a moth ball? There is not chemical reaction there, but vapors are present? It is a physical process called "sublimation." Sublimation is NOT a chemical process, but it does happen. Look it up.

      Whenever you smell ANYTHING, it is because either particles or chemicals are in the air. So your theory of chemical reactions is false. Anything which can vaporize will emit chemicals. Plus, the problem is worse if there are porous materials saturated with a volatile chemical (volatile meaning that it can emite a vapor).

      As far as cleaning everything first (if that would work), I am not worried about myself, but my children. I feel free to gamble a little with my life, but not those of my kids.

      Also, using an air filter on the air intakes of my computer is a step to keep dust out. On my old PC, I found dust around the I/O connectors on my sound card, around the edges of the CD-Rom drives, etc. Then I installed an intake fan and found dust on all of the fans, and all over the processor heat sink. So I decided that I wanted filters to help keep the system running cool, and NOT for health reasons. But if the dust is the problem, then no dust in = no dust out. As simple as that.

      If this turns out to be a threat that cannot be controlle, that I am happy to live with it. I am not getting paranoid here. I am still getting my computer. But if I can remove even a minor source of chemials easily, I will do so. If not, then I will just live with it and not worry about it. There is a difference between taking sensible precautions if possible, and spreading panic. Douglas Adams would be proud of me ;)

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  14. UW? by abscondment · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Good to know it's not just the lead paint in my apartment.

    btw, that article doesn't mention the university of washington at all. Google doesn't seem to think they have anything, either

  15. Already there. by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Umm, if it collects on your puter and monitor, it was already there. Just now it's in one place for easier cleaning.

  16. Everything is bad those days by Walrusss · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Well, I think benzene is one of the chemical that causes one of the biggest health threat.

    If I recon correctly, gasoline fumes contains beneze. Have we stopped using gas ? I think not.

    Everything is a question of risk. Just going outside is a health risk. Let's stop panicking for a while. We all gotta die of something.

    1. Re:Everything is bad those days by abb3w · · Score: 2, Informative

      If I recon correctly, gasoline fumes contains beneze. Have we stopped using gas ?

      No, but most western countries have put limits on the amount of benzene permissible in gasoline, eg: USA, Canada, etc.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  17. And just how many grams per mouse did it take?? by the_rajah · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Scientists say the chemicals have caused developmental and learning defects in laboratory animals" A lot of substances are harmful in high concentrations and are these compounds not also found elsewhere? Let's take a realistic look at this before we panic and start wearing gas masks when we are within 10 feet of our computers.

    Who needs cases anyway? It's a lot easier to change the configuration on my machines if I don't have to mess with those pesky cases anyway.

    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
  18. Computers will kill us all by Mr.Dippy · · Score: 4, Funny

    So let me get this straight.

    Computers
    1.Cause neurological damage
    2.Cause your eyes to go semi blind.
    3.Cause you to become lazy and fat


    Am I missing anything here?

    --


    -Dipster
  19. The website has plenty of propaganda by Crasoum · · Score: 3, Informative
    The capacity of PBDEs to bioaccumulate in fatty tissue and biomagnify up the food chain, in combination with their persistence and toxicity make this class of chemicals of high concern to the environment and human health.

    If you eat your pets, you have more problems then just PBDEs

    Now the accumilate of this chemical through birds is worrysome, just like what has been happeenign with Mecury and Pesticides, but how much of the article is just scare tactics of few to frighten many?

    As all things, before anyone becomes overly worried, research. Afterall it takes some odd 100+ cans of diet Dr pepper with saccharine a day to get possible cancer.

    Then again, I could be mis-informed
    1. Re:The website has plenty of propaganda by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Informative

      It might take some odd 100+ cans of soda with saccarine to get cancer, but:

      - What about the flavor enhancers, dyes, preservatives, and other such synthetic 'foods' which we eat daily?
      - What about the horemones, pesticides, and animal drugs which we eat whenever we consume meat?
      - What about the pesticides we eat whenever we consume even non-processed fruits?
      - What about the polution from combusted petrolium?
      - What about the mercury that is now all-too-present in nearly all fish?
      - What about the chlorine and other toxins added to our drinking water?
      - What about the large amounts of radiation that now bombard us from the sun, due to canopy depletion?
      - What about the miriad of toxins in your average household cleaner, paint, or other such off-the-shelf can?
      - What about the millions of pounds of other air or water-born chemicals which are put out by industry every year?
      - There are many, many, many more...

      Face it. There are a lot of factor's in today's modern world which lead to getting cancer. It's why there is such a high instnace of cancer in the world today.

      I'd think that in 20 years, cancer incidence will be a lot higher - almost to epedemic proportions. Then maybe the medical industry will stop irradiating people to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars, and stop sitting on the various actual cures which have been experimented with.

      Until then, we'll just have to try and eat healthily, exercise, and try and avoid contact with the nastier elements.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  20. Hrmph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Like geeks keep shit clean anyway. Only thing worse than living in a damp, dusty, mother's basement while consuming week-old moldy pizza is going outside and having the chance that you might be hit by a subway car being ejected from the tunnels ala Speed.

  21. Further proof by Exiler · · Score: 3, Funny

    that research causes disorders in lab animals.

    --
    Banaaaana!
    1. Re:Further proof by oneandoneis2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Indeed, animal testing is a dreadful idea. They get all nervous and give the wrong answers.

      --
      So.. it has come to this
  22. You can joke but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's already been documented that silicon valley has the highest incidence of autism in children, as well as a growing rate of infertility. No idea on cancer yet.

    Health care people also have increasing rates of autistic children, and at the same time their work environment has become increasingly technical (higher end imaging systems etc) I have not seen breakouts on different professions, expect more studies to follow.

    I have four friends with recently diagnosed autistic kids, Parents: radiation technician, nurse, medical equipment technician, programmer, data administrator.

    The fall of the Roman empire was attributed partly to the fact that the wealthy and affluent would drink wines out of lead vessels while the poor drank from animal sacks. The wealthy and powerful ended up poisoning their minds and allowed the barbarians to overun them. We may be doing the exact same thing with technology.

    Those who do not learn from history are destined to repeat it.

    1. Re:You can joke but... by slackerboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, and some of that is quite possibly due to an increased knowledge of autism and therefore increased diagnosis.

      In the case of Silicon Valley, I read an article that talked about the fact that there are an unusually high number of children with Asperger syndrome (a mild form of autism). Since people with Asperger are still fairly functional in society but have some quirks (like the inability to understand that not everyone sees things the same way they do), some scientists believe that a lot of geeks may actually have undiagnosed Asperger's. Once you concentrate enough people with this syndrome/genetic predisposition for it and then they start raising families of their own...

      Which is not to say that there are no other causes, just that they may not be environmental. The fact of the matter is that no one really understands autism.

      --
      Things to do today: See list of things to do yesterday
    2. Re:You can joke but... by Zcipher · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The fall of the Roman empire was attributed partly to the fact that the wealthy and affluent would drink wines out of lead vessels while the poor drank from animal sacks. The wealthy and powerful ended up poisoning their minds and allowed the barbarians to overun them. We may be doing the exact same thing with technology.

      As self-appointed history nazi, I have to take issue with this characterization.

      First of all, remember that there wasn't exactly an incredible increase in the technology of drinking vessels near the end of the roman empire. That is to say, people had been drinking out of basically the same types of cups for CENTURIES; why wouldn't they have gotten stupider sooner? Furthermore, I seem to recall that most of the systems used to transport water used lead, too, so it's not like the poor weren't getting their requisite doses, too.

      Second, the whole idea of outside barbarians attacking the Roman Empire is a gross simplification and a misunderstanding of the numerous factors involved. Most salient is the fact that pretty much all of those barbarian attacks didn't start in barbarian lands; they were the results of "barbarians" who had been in the Roman Army, and correspondingly granted land for themselves and their descendants, becoming irrate over unfair taxation and denial of wages owed, and taking up arms against what had become THEIR empire. Simply put, the barbarians didn't overrun Rome; they were just what was left when it fell apart.

      Yes, yes; offtopic, I know, but I have a bit of a pet peeve about inaccuracies, especially regarding the Middle Ages, the "history" of which most people have learned is basically less history and more a morality play created by Reniassance thinkers to suit their own agendas. Hell, even the NAME reveals the bias (there's the Classical period, and the Reniassance, and then all that stuff in the Middle that doesn't matter and didn't contain anything of value, according to the period thinkers who've shaped our views).

    3. Re:You can joke but... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's already been documented that silicon valley has the highest incidence of autism in children, as well as a growing rate of infertility.

      Correlation does not prove causation.

      I have four friends with recently diagnosed autistic kids, Parents: radiation technician, nurse, medical equipment technician, programmer, data administrator.

      Nor does anecdotal evidence.

  23. Think how your intellect is affected. by index72 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know of a banking software support department that was a victim of toxic overload. Their work area was full of computers, smelly carpet on the floor and walls of the cubicles and chemical emmiting magic markers strewn profusely around the work area. Added to that were stacks of computer manuals emitting printing ink vapors. The coup de grace was the cleaning lady that would spray deodorizer and wipe everybody's cubicle down with a cloth so dirty it probably was infected with several new undocumented life forms. What happened here was a situation where a large bank's database needed repairig, a major change that was to be done remotely from the tech support area. A dozen or so guys sat in on planning the change as well as the head of the department. A considerable amount of time was devoted to developing the proposed change. They diagrammed out the change on their chemically saturated ink pen markup board, the kind that is so common these days in corporations (no mind that junkies sniff the same type markers to get high). While they made their changes the cleaning lady made her rounds, the network laser printer spewed pages and clouds of toxic vapors, the fax machine added to this toll of chemical brew. When the time came to make the changes on the bank's ACTIVE database the mouse was clicked. One guy said as soon as that was done he realized they had screwed up. A banking system that processed tens of millions of dollars per hour was brought to it's knees. These guys were literally poisoned by the conditions prevailing in their work area and it made them look like chumps. There were other signs, particulary a high rate of headaches and one guy even had a sinus infection so bad that he ended up in the hospital(he was taking asprin because he just thought he had a 2 week long headache). While no one source of chemical outgassing is particularly signifigant it adds up.

  24. Patent expired by ballpoint · · Score: 3, Insightful

    PBDE's were first used in the 1970. All related patents are expired by now, and the revenue stream is tanking due to increased competition. Time to 'leak' some info to the greens who will happily lobby to have these 'dangerous' chemicals outlawed.

    Too cynical ?

    --
    Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
  25. Dust ON computers? by lone_marauder · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am a little confused. My research indicates that computers really don't generate very much dust at all. When they are new, they are very clean and generally devoid of fibrous substances that could be liberated as dust.

    I have found, however, that computers make excellent dust accumulators. PBDEs are not only used in computers, but also in children's pajamas, mattresses, etc. - all of which generate large quantities of dust. If there are harmful flame retardant chemicals in the dust, wouldn't that have more to do with the mattress, furniture, and clothing than it would with the computer?

    --
    who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars.
    1. Re:Dust ON computers? by dupup · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not sure if this helps, but I just heard on NPR that the PBDEs leach out of the plastic that's used in the housing.

  26. CDC FAQ on PBBs and PBDEs by rtos · · Score: 3, Informative
    US CDC has a rather helpful list of questions and answers called ToxFAQs(TM) for Polybrominated Biphenyls and Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBBs AND PBDEs). Of particular interest is this:
    " HIGHLIGHTS: Polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) are manmade chemicals found in plastics used in a variety of consumer products to make them difficult to burn. Some people who ate food contaminated with PBBs in the 1970s had skin problems. Almost nothing is known about health effects of PBDEs in people. PBBs have been found in at least 9 of the 1,613 National Priorities List sites identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). PBDEs have not been identified in any of the 1,613 sites."
    Basically, we don't really know much about the effects on humans of this class of chemicals. That said, they do seem to be very persistant chemicals... which could exacerbate any problems that do eventually show up.

    Either way, I guess we should all stop licking our monitors and keyboards just in case.

    --
    -- null
  27. The life you save... by Chordonblue · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...may not be your own. There's been a lot of jokes here about how no one's going to live forever and all that bullshit, but there are other considerations than yourself.

    Let me give you a *painful* personal example. Three years ago, my six year old son was diagnosed with Autism - a genetic defect that may in fact be linked to chemicals such as these.

    It would really piss me off to find that my career was directly responsible for his condition. My wife sent me this article before even Slashdot picked it up and it got me thinking about it.

    It's all water under the bridge now, but my son's condition has affected our lives in countless ways including the decision not to have children in the future.

    It also made me wonder about this article on Wired:

    http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/9.12/asperger s_ pr.html

    It's how Silicon Valley has the highest rates of Autism in the country. Maybe it's not so much who you mate with, but in what environment...

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:The life you save... by Chordonblue · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We are extremely fortunate in that his Autism was caught early and that intervention has worked wonders. Today, you'd hardly know he wasn't a 'normal' little boy of six were it not for his social interaction quirks.

      And you are right, I probably wouldn't change my profession, but you have to wonder what might have been in other circumstances nonetheless. I may not blame the technology - but I do blame unscruplulous corporations who have been known to hide the true dangers of the stuff they hawk.

      All I'm saying is that:

      a) People working in this field need to consider the possible risks.

      b) If, in the future, a company is found to have violated some sort of environmental laws they need to be nailed to the wall - big time.

      --
      "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    2. Re:The life you save... by Chordonblue · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If it was a 'Duh', as you say - this article wouldn't exist. The fact is, these risks aren't always immediately apparent.

      --
      "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    3. Re:The life you save... by RedShoeRider · · Score: 2, Interesting
      A note to the parent of the thread: I'm not attacking/putting down/otherwise disagreeing with you or anyone else. I'm just posting. The job you have as the parent of an Autistic child is countless times harder than a "normal" parent, and their job sucks to start with!

      The rise in a lot of "unknown in origin" diseases might not have as much to do with environment as we think, or as much as the media would want you do believe. Sure, it plays a role, but it's likely a minor one. The three things that do play a huge role: 1) Genetics. 2) Population. 3) Diagnosis.

      Works something like this:

      1) Genetics. Some place like Silicon Valley, as the parent mentioned, has largely the same subset of people in it. Given that there is some sort of genetic predisposition to what kind of intellegence you have (ie: you're good with your hands, you're killer at mathematics), it's plausable to assume that the people who frequent such a place has the same sort of genetic subsets. Which is great: you have lots of people who think the way you do. It also sucks in that every subset has certain genetic predispositions, and the flaws that go with them. So if you have a whole lot of the same sort of people, with the same sort of genome.....you run that much better of a chance of having odd things happen.

      2) Population. Let's say that autism occurs (for whatever reason) in 0.00001 percent of the population. Given that the world population is increasing at an incredable rate, the rate of historically rare diseases goes way the hell up.

      3) Diagnosis. 100 years ago, lots and lots of people died from Cancer. We have no idea how many, really, 'cause there was absloutely no solid way to dignose it. Same thing for disesases like Autism. 50 years ago, the child might have been labeled "troubled" or "maladjusted". The fact that there are defined guidelines these days means that we have a better idea, as a whole, what things are actually afflicting society. Couple this idea with #2, and you have diseases that "didn't exist" 50 years ago running rampant in society.

      My point: sure, thinks like smoking while pregnant will cause problems. The odds that something like this causes a problem like Austim.....well, I'm more likely to be hit by lightning while wearing my tin-foil hat. The human genome, while decoded, has more unknown stuff in it than the nearest 3 galaxies. Before we go chasing ghosts, we need to look to our own cells.

      And yes, I am a biologist. You should hear the arguements about this sort of shit at lunch break.

      --

      Chris Knight is my hero.

  28. Very surprised... by akaina · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am very surprised at the reaction from the community here. I hate FUD spreading fear-mongers as much as the next geek, but this isn't the first time we've learned that we need to actively remove dangerous substances from daily interaction.

    Anyone here have exposed their kids to PB based paint? Anyone here use any DDT on their lawn this year?

    These chemicals are cummulative and the damage cannot be undone. Let's hope these kind of studies continue to educate law makers.

    We really shouldn't be so lax about infant technology that hasn't been fully explored.

    --
    Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose.
  29. How to Detect PBDE on Your Equipment by PingPongBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since PBDE is used for flame retardant, hold your expensive equipment next to a blowtorch

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  30. some of us are a tad more concerned by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ...I stopped licking my keyboard when I was 16.

    I know you all think that's really funny, but as someone who's done a fair amount of desktop support, I've cleaned many a keyboard/monitor and especially CPU by dusting with a can of air. Which has usually generated a huge plume of dust. Which I've certainly inhaled quite a bit of.

    So pardon as I act a little more concerned than you, because this reads much like the stories from 60 year old guys with lung cancer who worked in asbestos plants and whatnot. "Sure, there was all this stuff flying around, but hey, we thought, 'its just dust'" etc.

  31. Some numbers and thoughts... by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Informative
    From the linked report, the highest concentrations observed in the sampled dust were on the order of 200 pg/cm^2. That's 2E-10 grams per square centimeter; most of their measurements found lower concentrations.

    Their wipe tests were performed after dust was allowed to accumulate for at least five days. Let's suppose that I regularly remove and ingest the dust from 200 cm^2 of my computer. That would be licking the dust off about thirty square inches of my computer's case.

    In that case, I'm being exposed to 40 ng per week, or about 2 micrograms per year. That's about 0.1 mg over the course of my lifetime--a tenth of a milligram.

    A recent literature review(1) (abstract and full text) gives a threshold for toxicity due to octa-BDE (the most toxic compounds studied in the wipe tets) as 2 mg/kg (fetal toxicity/teratongenicity, rat and rabbit models.)

    The most toxic compound being phased out (penta-BDE; not measured in the wipe tests) affects neurobehavioural development from 0.6 mg/kg (rat and mouse models.)

    The carcinogenicity of these compounds is not well-characterized, however any effects seem to appear at much higher exposures that one would expect in the real world.

    In other words, these compounds bear watching and the fact that they are bioaccumulative is troubling--but they're definitely not something to panic about. I'd also be more concerned about ingestion from other sources--bioaccumulations in fish and eggs--rather than from your computer hardware. Those problems, in turn, can be addressed through proper disposal of retired computer equipment.

    (1) Darnerud PO. "Toxic effects of brominated flame retardants in man and in wildlife." Environ. Int. 29(6):841-53 (2003).

    --
    ~Idarubicin
  32. A little sanity from The Reg's article-- by caveat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "According to other scientists, such as Dr. Gina Solomon, senior scientist at the Natural Resources Defense Council, there is no need to panic. They say that although the levels of PBDEs are high enough to be worth talking about, they are unlikely to pose a serious threat to human health."

    'Nuff said.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  33. BAN DHMO by iammrjvo · · Score: 3, Funny


    These toxins are produced with DHMO!

    SUPPORT A BAN ON DHMO!

    "It's a moral imperative."

    --
    Ha, ha! Nobody ever says Italy.
  34. Bullshit by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Asperger's and autism are more likely due to the fact that it's a geek haven.

    A choice quote: "Scientists strongly believe that autism is greatly influenced by genes."

    I'm not worried about this toxic dust article. I keep my area cleaned. Independent researchers aren't worried about it. We've had computers since the 1970s. When Stallman grows a third arm, that's when I'll start getting worried.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
  35. Re:Doing something by HRH+King+Lerxst · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm sorry, before ABS, the reasonable expectation was that if you slam on your brakes, your wheels lock up and you take longer to stop, and loose directional control of your car.
    ABS may make the distance to stop your car slightly greater in dry weather, if you can brake like Niki Lauda or Michael Schumacher.

    I know I pretty much can't do that, so I'll gladly slam on the brakes as hard as I can, and let the computer figure it out, I guarantee you that I'll stop faster that way.

    --
    No one got beat up more often than the mimes of the old west!
  36. Poor lab rats... by greenegg77 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it just me or does everything kill lab rats?

    TOOTHPICKS FOUND TO CAUSE DEATH IN LAB RATS
    Scientists have discovered that force feeding lab rats 50,000 toothpicks caused death in 99.9% of cases studied. The one rat that survived eventually died from starvation.
    "This proves that toothpicks are dangerous and should have warnings printed on them," said Bob T. Scientist, one of the researchers who turned mice into twiching pincushions.
    The FDA has yet to comment on this story.

    --
    --- This .sig for sale - $500 OBO.
  37. Chlorinated water by Dog135 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unfortunately for us, in the US at least, we have become overly obsessed with germs and germ fighting. Everything you see kills 99.9% of bacteria!

    My wife and I raise goats. (for milk & meat) One thing I noticed is I'm a lot more resistant to the "office flu" then my coworkers.

    Soon we will be bathing in extra strength bleach, drinking pool water (we basically do), and using disposable/burnable everything.

    On occasion, my wife and I will spend a few days at her parent's house. They live in the city. I can hardly stand to take a bath there because the fumes from the chlorine hurt my eyes. I swear they have more chlorine in their water then in a pool! We can't stand drinking it, so we buy bottled water.

    At home my water comes from a well. It's probably packed with e.coli and anthrax, since I'm raising goats a few hundred feet from the well head. In fact, I'm pretty sure it has e.coli, since e.coli outbreaks occure at country fairs if they use the water out of the well for the city folk. (doesn't effect the country folk) Most fairs will bring in bottled water for that reason.

    --
    "That's so plausible, I can't believe it!" - Leela
  38. PDBE's by eriks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    May be a primary cause of Sudden Infant Desth Syndrome (SIDS).

    A lot of research has been done in this area recently.

    It may not be a conspiracy, but there seems to be something to it.