Slashdot Mirror


Linux Credits File Reanimated

No_Weak_Heart writes "In his in depth paper Evolution of the Linux Credits file, Ilkka Tuomi discusses the challenges of extracting data from open source files, and then uses the extracted data to describe the geographical expansion of the core Linux developer community."

125 comments

  1. That was quick by mozingod · · Score: 0

    /.'ed already. Any mirrors?

    1. Re:That was quick by AKAImBatman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That was quick. While you're waiting, you can check out the shamelessly self-promoted Linux reviews in my journal. ;-) Hmm... there goes my karma.

    2. Re:That was quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's not slashdotted, as of writing (after your post). But if goes down, try this (GIFs converted to PNG because I find GIF offensive).

  2. Who Knew? by WarriorPoet42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Luxumburg has more per capita changes then any other country?

    Finland needs to support its baby and fight back!

    --Ignore this thread as first posts are automatically modded down.

    1. Re:Who Knew? by pe1rxq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The numbers aren't that far from eachother....
      Luxemburg has such a small number of residents that a few coders more or less can have a huge impact on the number.

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    2. Re:Who Knew? by Freidenker · · Score: 1

      I didnt know I lived in such an Open Country. Feels good.

    3. Re:Who Knew? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      *LOL*
      Luxembourg has 1! developer.. Just one, just happens to be a very small country.
      Fighting back would involve killing lot fins to reduce them to Luxembourg level :)

    4. Re:Who Knew? by 4im · · Score: 1

      I guess that would be Mr. Linux floppy driver, the vice-president of LiLux. Hi Alain ;-)

      I do know for a fact that there's more than one guy in Luxembourg who hacks the kernel, or at least kernel modules, just no idea why they don't appear in the credits file.

    5. Re:Who Knew? by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      I consider this the most amazing fact:

      "For example, there are no developers from India, mainland China or Islamic countries."

      I thought China was among leaders (at least they talk a lot). And also the software power - India - is that possible?

      I guess it tells a lot about Linux - it's not _easy_ to live off it - only folks from well off countries can afford to donate code :-)

    6. Re:Who Knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      someone should point this out to that cornhole Dan O'Dowd...

    7. Re:Who Knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fighting back would involve killing lot fins to reduce them to Luxembourg level :)

      Finns, with two n's! Perkele!

    8. Re:Who Knew? by eam · · Score: 1

      > Fighting back would involve killing lot fins to
      > reduce them to Luxembourg level

      Not really. They could kill Luxembourg's 1 developer and then wait until they catch up.

  3. Where is Ken Brown? by KrisCowboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Look at this file you insensitive clod. Linus did write the kernel!!!

    1. Re:Where is Ken Brown? by DecayCell · · Score: 1

      The more important question is why the heck Santa isn't mentioned there?

    2. Re:Where is Ken Brown? by KrisCowboy · · Score: 1

      Well, that's 'cos the MINIX and UNIX codes are copyrighted. Ken Brown informed Santa that his ass will be busted this chirs'mas. Santa's on the run..he's the next Papillon :-) And to quote Ken Brown "Santa couldn't have written the code by himself - he hasn't finished his OS course and did just one year of C programming". Tell you what Ken "sonofabitch" Brown, Osama Bin Laden helped Linus write the kernel...in a cave in Afghanistan.

    3. Re:Where is Ken Brown? by cocotoni · · Score: 1

      Ken is live and well, listed as the first reference...

  4. We could... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We could use this to extract the part of the Linux kernel that SCO says they own, and prove them wrong once and for all.

    1. Re:We could... by bonch · · Score: 1

      SCO is a sinking ship. I don't think we really need to do anything more than let them dig their own hole deeper and deeper.

      McBride is mysteriously gone from the public press these days. Remember when we'd see a new interview almost every week?

    2. Re:We could... by eddy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah. Darling was overheating so SCO decided to replace him with The Enderle Troll and the AdTI trolls.

      "AdTI has a proven track record of generating national, regional and local press on issues ... Our press abilities are, quite frankly second to none. ... We would like to request $60,000, or $30,000 a month, to implement this program." -- AdTI fax to Philip Morris

      Translation: "Will publicly lie for money!"

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
  5. Credit List? by passthecrackpipe · · Score: 3, Funny

    Make sure Tanenbaum, Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy are listed, otherwise Ken Brown will get upset. Who knows what he will get up to if provoked - he may call all Linux developers thieves, or even worse names!

    --
    People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.
  6. Awww... not animated... by jrrl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Somehow I was imagining a world map with little lights popping up to show how development spread o'er the world over time.

    Very cool anyway, but not as eye-candy-ish.

    -jrrl.
    --
    Self Serving Sig: Hosting Comparison
  7. Where's SCO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Odd..
    I couldnt find SCO in there..

    1. Re:Where's SCO? by Atmchicago · · Score: 1

      Actually, SCO coders did conribute some code to the Linux Kernel, so there should be some people with @sco.com email adresses.

      --

      You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

    2. Re:Where's SCO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, there was a @notsco.com also.

  8. Related News by deutschemonte · · Score: 4, Funny
    "and then uses the extracted data to describe the geographical expansion of the core Linux developer community."
    In a related breaking story, SCO is using these results to track down and sue Linux developers RIAA style.
    --
    The preceding message was based on actual events. Only the names, locations and events have been changed.
  9. Research ?????? by Krapangor · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Sorry, but that's just parsing the credits file and doing some DNS lookups for the IP adresses. This might be considered a fun project on sourceforge but not serious research. You might ask now why I'm bitching about this. But that's really an important issue. Dead tree journals are getting more and more expensive and serious scientists are trying to biuld up a royality-free alternative. When self acclaimed "peer-reviewed" electronic journals like First Monday are publishing such human insterest stuff as "research" then they are harming the reputation of all electronic scientific journals and especially the projects to create a royalty-free peer-reviewed publication chain. And thus they are in fact harming science. Slashdot should in no way encourage such behavior.

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
    1. Re:Research ?????? by Mr2cents · · Score: 5, Informative
      Talking about research, did you read the article? Did you check the credits file? Let me show you a snippet:
      N: Matti Aarnio
      E: *** (not printing someone else's email here as a spambot target)
      D: Alpha systems hacking, IPv6 and other network related stuff
      D: One of assisting postmasters for vger.kernel.org's lists
      S: (ask for current address)
      S: Finland

      N: Dragos Acostachioaie
      E: ***
      W: http://www.arbornet.org/~dragos
      D: /proc/sysvipc
      S: C. Negri 6, bl. D3
      S: Iasi 6600
      S: Romania
      A good part of the article is dedicated to the analysis, I suggest you check it out. Of course, it's difficult to resist writing an ad-hoc opinion when you see an article with only a few comments..
      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    2. Re:Research ?????? by forgetmenot · · Score: 1

      I understand your point and agree with it somewhat. Nonetheless, I think this article has it's merits. Maybe not so much as a scientific piece. Perhaps it would find a better home in a sociological journal.

    3. Re:Research ?????? by raquelita · · Score: 1

      In Fact, it is just another Data Mining project.
      It is a good example of the artisan methods :-)

      --
      Yes, I am a /.er girl http://raquelms-travel.blogspot.com
  10. Off-topic-but would help me out by AviLazar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I've been on /. for a number of months now, and i have been trying (casually) to figure out what it means when someone says a website has been "/.'ed"
    Would someone please let me know, and while you're at it, don't be an insensitive clod (unless its funny) :)

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    1. Re:Off-topic-but would help me out by jargoone · · Score: 1

      Try to go to the website linked in the story. See if you can get the webserver to respond. That's what it means. :-)

    2. Re:Off-topic-but would help me out by grahamlee · · Score: 1

      Just that the server on which the off-site information is maintained has melted, in trying to serve the 60,000-ish requests per hour that slashdot generates.

    3. Re:Off-topic-but would help me out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch your web site at www.avilazar.com carefully as we demonstrate... and I'll post as AC in case someone chooses to counter-demonstrate on my own web site.

    4. Re:Off-topic-but would help me out by stiffneck · · Score: 1
      /.'ed, or slashdotted, also known as slashdot effect; what is said to have happened when a website being virtually unreachable because too many people are hitting it after the site was mentioned in an interesting article on the popular Slashdot news service. The term is quite widely used by /. readers, including variants like "That site has been slashdotted again!"

      clicky for more info.

    5. Re:Off-topic-but would help me out by technix4beos · · Score: 1
      You might also be interested in seeing an analysis of the "Slashdot Effect":

      here ssadler.phy.bnl.gov/adler/SDE/SlashDotEffect.html

      (Note: /. comment submit form officially sucks. ;)

      --
      user@host$ diff /dev/urandom /dev/uspto
    6. Re:Off-topic-but would help me out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point to note
      the articles needen't always be *interesting*

  11. Statistical Significance by 14erCleaner · · Score: 3, Interesting
    From the article: In July 2002, the Credits file contained information on 418 developers. With two exceptions, all were male.

    Anyone who thinks there's little difference between the way men's and women's brains work should consider this statistic. I don't think that societal expectations, peer pressure, or discrimination can account for the 200-to-1 ratio in this case. It's probably safe to conclude that the kernel-hacker gene resides on the Y chromosome.

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
    1. Re:Statistical Significance by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1
      I've met plenty of women who blow me away in science in math

      Actually, I'm married to one (my wife has a PhD), and my daughter is another (just graduated valedictorian of her high-school class with 1600 SAT). I'm a comparative slacker within my own family, but I'm still more of a hacker than my wife, or than my daughter will likely be (at least I hope she doesn't grow up to be as maladjusted as I am :)

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    2. Re:Statistical Significance by gowen · · Score: 1
      I don't think that societal expectations, peer pressure, or discrimination can account for the 200-to-1 ratio in this case.
      In the nicest possible way, I don't care what you think. Opinions are like assholes. Sure, this is a datapoint, but to suggest that it implies on thing or another about societal versus genetic pressures is just a nonsense.

      Where's your evidence? What's your reasoning? How does the size of the sample affect the plausible distribution? Whats the null hypothesis?

      My all means express opinions, but don't pretend they're facts until you're prepared to put the work in to make the case.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    3. Re:Statistical Significance by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 1

      Some where down in the 7th section, the author too comments on this

      A simple economic theory of opportunity costs would therefore imply that women and men exist in two different economic spheres, or that women are paid much better for commercial software development than men.

      To gain mod points from the women on /. I would say the second reason is true

      (Karma be damned; I am no better than an AC anyway)

    4. Re:Statistical Significance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I dont think"... sounds like an opinion to me. I don't see OP pretending that said opinion is a fact. Take it easy perhaps?

    5. Re:Statistical Significance by gowen · · Score: 1

      And if he'd left it there, that'd've been OK. Its from "Its probably safe to conclude ..." that he starts talking through his hat.

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    6. Re:Statistical Significance by squaretorus · · Score: 1

      And I'm willing to bet the two chicks are only listed because they slept with someone, and threatened to tell his mom. "the day you sleep with a woman you move OUT of my basement young man!"

      Or because the compilers searched for ANY chicks to list to avoid claims of sexism - no matter how small their contribution.

      And remember folks. I'm 100% serious. Yes. Yes I am!

  12. The Whole World Developing Linux? by xiando · · Score: 1

    If the current trend in the "Figure 1: Number of people in the Credits file." graph keeps going then it's simply a matter of time before every inhabitent on this spinning ball called Earth is credited for conributing to the Linux kernel..

  13. Patently and Blatently False... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    He says there are no developers from india...IBM has at least a couple on hire over there....

    1. Re:Patently and Blatently False... by leerpm · · Score: 3, Informative

      The credits file is not a listing of every single developer who has ever contributed a line of code or more. It is a list of those who have made significant contributions, and few who made relatively minor.

      Just because IBM set up a Linux lab in India, does not mean that lab is contributing in any significant way to the codebase of Linux, though they might be helping in other ways such using Linux at IBM.

  14. The real question is... by TechnologyX · · Score: 5, Funny

    "In July 2002, the Credits file contained information on 418 developers. With two exceptions, all were male "

    2 female types listed in the credits file? With contact information? Time to do a little research of my own...

    --
    Slashdot sucks
    1. Re:The real question is... by stienman · · Score: 1

      Don't bother, both are probably taken. I can see it now...

      Male: "Honey, would you come here a minute and tell me why this is segfaulting?"
      Female: "Well here's the problem, you forgot to initialize here, this shouldn't be an assignment, and you're obviously locking the resources in the wrong order so you're facing a deadlock anyway."
      Male: "Can you fix it for me, sweetie? Star trek starts in 10."
      Female: Sigh
      ...

      -Adam

    2. Re:The real question is... by Sibshops · · Score: 0

      !male may also mean that the two "exceptions" are she-males. :-O

  15. Virtuoso Documentation by wombatmobile · · Score: 1

    That is virtuoso documentation of the methods used to analyse the documentation of the code credits.

    Someone that talented should be writing code.

  16. Or... by bonch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It could just be that nerdy males with fewer social skills tend to gravitate toward introverted tasks that don't require a lot of personal interaction with others.

    Women, by nature, are more social creatures. Sitting alone in a basement at night hacking a kernel isn't necessarily something they can't do (I've met plenty of women who blow me away in science in math), it's something they don't want to do. Hell, I had to ask one of my female friends to help me with some SQL statements for my website. She is a complete SQL expert, and better than any male I know.

    1. Re:Or... by xutopia · · Score: 1
      I hate it when people see genetics as only a can or cannot do scenario. Perhaps taste is genetic and even if one sex is as good or better than the other at something perhaps they wouldn't want to do it in the first place.

      An example is that women aren't better at doing dishes, it is just than men are more likely to hate it for whatever genetic/memetic reason.

      ducks....

    2. Re:Or... by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Women, by nature, are more social creatures

      I dont think that is the real connection. With all the desperate men out there, it is just a lot harder for a woman to still be a virgin a 20yr, unless it is a consious choice (still hard). In other words, they better things to do a friday night than hack on the linux-kernel.

    3. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've met plenty of women who blow me...

      Oh! How did you manage that?!

      ...away in science in math

      hmz, nevermind

    4. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's face facts here. Men are pathetic. Since I am one, I can say "without women men are pathetic." Only a few rare individuals have the looks and charm to win over any woman they want. I bother naming those lucky individuals. The rest of US men are lucky to get a woman's attention. The exception is gay men. They pretty much have it when ever they want it. So really, all this statistic proves is this, "women dictate when men have sex." Now get back to programming.

    5. Re:Or... by Ninwa · · Score: 0

      Wait, are you implying that sex is more fun than hacking a linux kernel? I don't know what parelell universe YOU came from! Now if you'll excuse me I have some pleasure to attend to, *dissapears into /src*

    6. Re:Or... by Khazunga · · Score: 1
      It could just be that nerdy males with fewer social skills tend to gravitate toward introverted tasks that don't require a lot of personal interaction with others.
      Sorry, but it's not that women don't like "introverted tasks". Loads of women like knitting, decorating and doing other kind of manual work that requires little to no interaction with other human beings.
      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    7. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wait, are you implying that sex is more fun than hacking a linux kernel?"

      yes, but we're talking about actual sex, not rubbin off to japanipr0n

  17. looks like a good job... by xot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thats a good job to have in the corporate IT world.Just make sure everyone gets credit... and you get paid!
    I would say just make sure the guy who pays you gets credit and everything else runs fine. :-)

    --
    Lord of the Binges.
  18. Major? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At the time, it would have been difficult to predict that Linux would ten years later be considered as a major threat to Microsoft's dominance in operating systems.

    major threat..lol

  19. Potential flamers please read by GillBates0 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Those of you intending to point out that there are "very few" open source contributors from India (or largely developing countries) please take a moment to ponder and note that not every computer enthusiast in the world has the resources, means or relative luxury needed to actively contribute or even pursue a hobby.

    Most programmers from the developed countries (read US, Europe) take the computer/network resources and even their standard of living for granted. Computer prices and network acces in developing countries is still sparse and exorbitant for most people.

    Moreover, writing code for a hobby is at the back of the minds of most people, when their foremost worries are basic comforts needed for a comfortable life (read electricity, job, steady income, etc). It is only when a comfortable life is guaranteed, that a person has the luxury/option/motivation to pursue hobbies.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Potential flamers please read by perly-king-69 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Quite. It would have been nice touch if the per-capita table had some sort of GDP/capita value factored in, rather than assume each person had equivalent access to computer hardware.

      Lies, damned lies, and statistics... ;-)

      --

      --
      This sig is inoffensive.

    2. Re:Potential flamers please read by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      Thank goodness, I'd hate to think my hobbies had also been outsourced to India along with my job ;->

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
  20. Brown's Samizdat is an acronym by PourYourselfSomeTea · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Surreptitious
    And
    Moronic
    Incindiary
    Z -- it makes the title look cooler
    Diatribe
    Against
    Torvalds

  21. The CREDITS file is not very accurate by mocm · · Score: 5, Informative

    The people in the CREDITS file are not all the people that work on the kernel. You should look at the Copyright notices in the source code.
    E.g. I am not in the CREDITS file (not that I need to be), but I have Copyright notices in over 30 files. I guess there are many more people working on parts of the linux kernel than are noticed in the CREDITS file.

    --
    ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
    1. Re:The CREDITS file is not very accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sure will credit you for having ugliest webpage... Ever! :)

    2. Re:The CREDITS file is not very accurate by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 1

      Seriously

      A web page with bgcolor set to "#3309ff" is definitely not one that one would be willing to look at for more than a couple of seconds.

      Being w3c html compliant doesn't actually matter for a simple page as this, except perhaps for the html parsers in the browsers (the rendering actually (surprisingly) is broken in opera 7.11 with invisible hyperlinking to metzlerbros.de on the three sides of the 'Free Speech Online Blue Ribbon Campaign' gif)

      Not that this is a personal dig at Dr.Metzler, but in my opinion reasons as this are the cause of many a people's view of geeks as impractical(/unsophisticated.....) in the real world

      (Karma be damned; I am no better than AC anyway)

    3. Re:The CREDITS file is not very accurate by ischemic · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yes, the CREDITS file is not comprehensive, and (at least in 1998), the copyright notices were somewhat better but also not definitive.

      You might be interested in a (old, 1999) paper on how you can use the CREDITS file to try to figure out how the Linux kernel interacts by looking at how developers work on different parts of the system.

      I think that the lack of definitiveness of the CREDITS file and copyright notices is very understandable given the way they are updated manually. It might be an argument for having meta-data associated with source code. This type of information is encoded in a revision control system if everyone uses is, but with open source, the author of some code fragment is not necessarily going to log into your cvs repository and edit the text. Someone else may be cloning the code and inserting it (with the author's GPL blessing). It would be nice if there were a standardized way to track these types of edits and code provenance. Might be especially useful in refuting SCO type FUD.

      I haven't looked at what Linus is doing with enhanced copyright tracking; is that something that can be standardized/automated/shared with other projects?

  22. So not true by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am sick of hearing this "lone hacker theory" rubbish. Since anyone who works on the kernel is going to be constantly emailing, newsgrouping, and using IRC/IM there is no reason to label them as unsocialable. Just because you are using a computer to do the socialising doesn't make it count less than an afternoon at the pub with your workmates. If they were sitting in their basements and hacking their own sources and never communicating with other developers then your model might hold up, but it just isn't relevant any more.

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    1. Re:So not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, if you can't tell the difference in value between direct communication and machine-mediated - you need some serious help.

    2. Re:So not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT. YHL. HAND.

      Love,
      bonch (aka Overly Critical Guy)

    3. Re:So not true by CandyMan · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      The ratio of female-to-male in IRC channels and MUDs is much higher than 2-to-400. So the "differently social" argument does not hold water.

      And university graduates, professors and researchers in technical endeavours are slowly filling their numbers with more women (although still far from 50/50 representation). So the "differently intelligent" does not account for the difference in participation, or at least is not the only factor.

      The reason for kernel hackers to be predominantly male has more to do, I think, with male bravado, testosterone levels increasing hard-headed will and also with the mechanism of displacement that Freud called sublimation.

      Camille Paglia said it better: "There is no female Mozart because there is no female Jack the Ripper". She also goes on about genius being a product of "male aggresion and teenage lust". I happen to agree with this.

      Whichever way you look at it, there are far fewer woman obsessives than man obsessives.

      --
      http://barrapunto.com/ - News for nerds, en español
  23. You've got to be joking by bonch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am sick of hearing this "lone hacker theory" rubbish. Since anyone who works on the kernel is going to be constantly emailing, newsgrouping, and using IRC/IM there is no reason to label them as unsocialable.

    You think typing text characters into an e-mail or on IRC is the same as actually speaking to somebody in person right in front of you, staring them in the face?

    Just because you are using a computer to do the socialising doesn't make it count less than an afternoon at the pub with your workmates.

    Socializing on a computer isn't the same as socializing in person. Comparing it to an afternoon at the pub with your workmates his hilaroius. You may as well say you're actually "speaking" to me right now, and it's the same as if we actually ran into each other in person and started debating. Completely different. IM, IRC, and e-mail allow you to communicate with others without actually confronting them face to face.

    1. Re:You've got to be joking by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      You think typing text characters into an e-mail or on IRC is the same as actually speaking to somebody in person right in front of you, staring them in the face?

      Yes, you insensitive friggin' clod.

      I see no fucking difference. They are the same words, being sent to the same fucking people, just over a different medium. What you are saying is "you can't have a social life unless you meet face to face".

      I CALL BULLSHIT. I have more online friends than offline, and am quite happy that way.

      Socializing on a computer isn't the same as socializing in person. Comparing it to an afternoon at the pub with your workmates his hilaroius. You may as well say you're actually "speaking" to me right now, and it's the same as if we actually ran into each other in person and started debating. Completely different.

      It practically is speaking. Same words, different medium.

      IM, IRC, and e-mail allow you to communicate with others without actually confronting them face to face.

      Exactly. You just summed it right the fuck up.

      I have Asperger's syndrome. I find it hard to talk to people face to face. Over the Internet, it's much easier, and as I said above I have more online friends than offline. Don't give me the same retarded bullshit about it "not being the same thing"-it is.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    2. Re:You've got to be joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      While you may find it hard to talk to people face to face, your over the internet ability appears to be lacking as well.

    3. Re:You've got to be joking by phrasebook · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I doubt you'd be using so many f-words if you were speaking to someone face to face. If your communication online is similar to offline as you say, then it's just as well you do most of it here and not out there!

    4. Re:You've got to be joking by vidarh · · Score: 1
      You can have meaningful relationships online, and you can have just as shallow interpersonal relationships offline as you can find online. As someone other than the poster you replied to, YES, I believe typing text characters into an e-mail or on IRC is more or less the same as actually speaking to somebody in person right in front of me, staring them in the face.

      Except that online, their physical appearance and the smell of their breath will have no impact on what I think of what they say, which in many ways can allow you to form relationships that are profoundly different from those you might have formed to the same people had you met them offline first.

      HOW is it any different?

    5. Re:You've got to be joking by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm sorry, but this sort of thing gets under my skin. I've heard the same retarded crap all my life from people like that, and it's one of many things that really pisses me off. /no more rants :)

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    6. Re:You've got to be joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with jb.hl.com.

    7. Re:You've got to be joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's more to communication and socialization than words. You'd realize this if you spent more time around people. I suggest you do some reasearch on non-verbal communication amongst social animals. Try doing the research at the library rather than online. That way you can combine "learning to do" with "learning about".

    8. Re:You've got to be joking by bonch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have Asperger's syndrome. I find it hard to talk to people face to face. Over the Internet, it's much easier, and as I said above I have more online friends than offline.

      First, you illustrate the difference you have between face-to-face communication and faceless communication behind a keyboard. I'd love to see you calling someone an "insensitive friggin' clod" in person, complete with all your profanity.

      Don't give me the same retarded bullshit about it "not being the same thing"-it is.

      But then, you claim it's the same thing. If it's the same thing, why can't you talk to people face to face? Because it's not the same thing. With Asperger's, you should know that better than anyone.

      There is more to socialization than sending words to people. My point was that women excel in this area and prefer it to sitting alone all day behind a keyboard sending text to people, when they could be laughing, smiling, and expressing themselves face-to-face with other actual humans that aren't just little text names in IRC.

      I don't doubt that personal relationships can be formed over the Internet, but in most cases it's not the same kind of personal relationships that form between people who actually see each other and physically interact. It's how our brains work.

    9. Re:You've got to be joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "retarded crap" was illustrated by your own posts, Mr. Asperger's. Think a little and read up on socialization. It's more than words. Maybe you'll someday emerge from your shell and befriend actual people.

      Proudly declaring that all your friends are merely text on a screen is one of the saddest things I've read here.

    10. Re:You've got to be joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how you would proceed with the relationship once you find out about the person's appearance (and breath) is the really important and interesting thing

    11. Re:You've got to be joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, leave the guy alone. If he's got Asperger's then his inability to comprehend the difference is natural. One of the key manifistations of Asperger's is severe socilization problems. The guy quite probably does communicate better online than off.

      http://www.udel.edu/bkirby/asperger/

    12. Re:You've got to be joking by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Indeed, from my (imperfect)understanding of Asperger's syndrome, Online would differ primarily in NOT physically see-ing or hearing the other person. That and online slows things down slightly giving him more time to formulate a reply.
      Aspergers in part reduces the ability to properly decode the subtle social cue's that would ordinarly differentiate on-line verses in person social interaction.
      The two types of social interaction are different for most people (though less so in the case of Aspergers), but they are still social. And in many cases online interaction can be a life line for those with disabilities and other situations that make 'in the flesh' social interactions difficult or unusually stressfull. The various social anxiety dissorders also come to mind.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    13. Re:You've got to be joking by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1
      You think typing text characters into an e-mail or on IRC is the same as actually speaking to somebody in person right in front of you, staring them in the face?

      No, I think it is different, but it is still socialising and communicating. The medium is not the message. If you believe that you can only have relationships through either hearing the other person or seeing them then you are assuming that all the blind and deaf people in this world are incapable of relationships.

      Text communication, particularly on the internet, has come in leaps and bounds and for someone like me is the *best* way to stay in contact with friends and make new ones. Example: back in BBS days I was chatting online occassionally to another BBS user and over the course of a few months we became friends. I didn't meet him for almost two years, but by the time we did we were very good friends. He is still a friend 15 years later, and now because he is in another country we maily keep in contact via email. I can picture his face and hear his voice while I read his emails.

      Socializing on a computer isn't the same as socializing in person. Comparing it to an afternoon at the pub with your workmates his hilaroius.

      My mates and I often drink, spliff, and play games over the net. We chat, joke and discuss our lives. The only thing missing is the facial cues and the sound of voices. Use of emoticons and other textural clues fill in a lot of what is lost through these two missing elements. Since two of those mates are in Australia, one is in Amsterdam, and three are over here in England this is absolutely the best way for us to remain friends and socialise together as a group.

      You may as well say you're actually "speaking" to me right now, and it's the same as if we actually ran into each other in person and started debating.

      It is. The only missing things are those visual and audible clues. I see them like hints as to what someone is saying, not what they are actually saying. If you have trouble expressing yourself in text then you would be better off with face-face meetings, but I am not one of those people. It is interesting to note, however,that your scenerio of running into each other in the street and debating is highly unlikely to occur, whereas it's almost guaranteed to happen on SlashDot. That is one area where internet based communication is clearly supperior to the old pub/street model.

      Finally, I truly believe that all the time I have spent on IM/IRC/mailing lists/SlashDot/etc has vastly improved my ability to communicate with others. The medium is more condusive to careful thought and consideration. Something that is lost in a society of people all waiting to speak rather than listening.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
  24. India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With all this hullabaloo about outsourcing, did you notice that there are no contributors from India?

    1. Re:India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, that's because programmers in India actually have jobs.

  25. Cue the feminists by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    During the evolution of Linux, new contributors have been continuously added to the file. In July 2002, the Credits file contained information on 418 developers. With two exceptions, all were male [1].

    Obviously Linux Kernal Development suffers from a serious lack of diversity. Time to get more young girls interested in kernal development. Perhaps we could have a "Female Kernal Developer" class required in the 6th grade....

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Cue the feminists by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Good idea. It could come right after the spelling class.

  26. I found SCO by Donny+Smith · · Score: 2, Funny

    >I couldnt find SCO in there

    They're represented in credits by Linux Torvalds

  27. Hold on there doggy. by cshark · · Score: 2, Funny

    Didn't microsoft just patent the process they're using to do this?

    --

    This signature has Super Cow Powers

  28. it's spelled KERNEL you dolt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  29. Trends by Ian+Peon · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Studies like this are interesting ways to spot trends. Note the levelling, then steep rise in US developers right around the time the dot-com bubble burst in 2000 seen in figure 2

    Anytime a large number of geeks have free time on their collective hands is good for the Linux kernel. Though, that shouldn't be a suprise to many here...

    1. Re:Trends by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 1

      A quick glance at Figure 2 reveals that there does not seem to be any obvious slowdown in the growth rate of Linux developers in the U.S. during the Internet boom years.

      Though not contradictory, an opinion of the author of the article about the boom-time

      (Karma be damned; I am no better than an AC anyway)

  30. !Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mods you shouldn't be rating the parent as funny

    Because that *is* the truth

  31. Difference in the brains by bonch · · Score: 1

    Loads of women like knitting, decorating and doing other kind of manual work that requires little to no interaction with other human beings.

    Are you for real? If they knit, they prefer to knight in groups. If they're decorating, they're usually doing it with their friends, including the shopping for items beforehand. They even go to the bathroom in groups. By nature, women are social. You're actually arguing this? Have you even read any scientific research about it?

    For starters, there's a small part of the male brain that becomes active when speaking and dealing with language. In females, the entire brain becomes active when they speak. The "father" of sociobiology, Edward O. Wilson, of Harvard University, said that human females tend to be higher than males in empathy, verbal skills, social skills and security-seeking, among other things, while men tend to be higher in independence, dominance, spatial and mathematical skills, rank-related aggression, and other characteristics.

    From http://www.psychologytoday.com/htdocs/prod/PTOArti cle/PTO-20030624-000003.asp:

    Women's perceptual skills are oriented to quick--call it intuitive--people reading. Females are gifted at detecting the feelings and thoughts of others, inferring intentions, absorbing contextual clues and responding in emotionally appropriate ways. They empathize. Tuned to others, they more readily see alternate sides of an argument. Such empathy fosters communication and primes females for attachment.

    Men focus first on minute detail, and operate most easily with a certain detachment. They construct rules-based analyses of the natural world, inanimate objects and events. In the coinage of Cambridge University psychologist Simon Baron-Cohen, Ph.D., they systemize.

    Seeing a pattern here? It's not that women can't do what men do and vice versa, it's just that we're more inclined to certain focus areas. Geeks like us are more likely to latch onto introverted tasks. As I said before, I know lots of incredible intellectuals who are female, but they'd rather hang out with friends in person than spend their weekends alone typing dialog to some text names on IRC. These differences in the sexes are what make humanity diverse and wonderful.

    1. Re:Difference in the brains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most of the scientific research leads to interpreations, suppositions, etc. hardly the conclusive proofs that back up strong conclusions...

      besides, if women were so social, more would be open to orgies and such so stfu

    2. Re:Difference in the brains by Khazunga · · Score: 1
      Are you for real? If they knit, they prefer to knight in groups. If they're decorating, they're usually doing it with their friends, including the shopping for items beforehand. They even go to the bathroom in groups. By nature, women are social. You're actually arguing this? Have you even read any scientific research about it?
      I am for real. That is your image of women kitting and decorating. The ones I know do that at home, usually alone. I know quite a bunch of them, and I know they do it for the fun of it, much as hackers hack for the fun of it. I was trying to show that women do like time alone, and lonely jobs. It's easy finding other lonely hobbies.

      Behavioural differences between sexes are part prejudice and part socially induced. Underneath, we are much the same. I guess women fleeing from computers is socially induced. It's not that they wouldn't like it: I proved some women like lonely hobbies and there are excellent female mathematicians out there, so there's no big roadblock, except social acceptance. A 10yr old girl spending too much time hacking into a computer is seen as a problem, whereas a boy is considered normal.

      I won't go into discussing sociobiology. Sociobiology is still very very far from providing authoritative answers, as can be proven by constant changes of interpretation, during the last decades. It won't be authoritative until we reverse-engineer the brain. Activation pattern analysis of a mechanism whose design you don't know is obviously a wasted effort. Example: Can you prove that the distributed pattern isn't a protection mechanism? Female mammals are much more resistant to illness, because you can afford the loss of males in a population, but a loss of females results in reduced birth rate.

      Women and men are different. I grant you that. But most of the difference is socially induced. Anyway, the end result is much the same. I just don't believe there are physiological differences strong enough to propel men and women into different jobs. Heck, women are even trying, with success, to get into construction work. History of the last century has been proving me right, and I'm sure it will continue to do so.

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    3. Re:Difference in the brains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess women fleeing from computers is socially induced. It's not that they wouldn't like it: I proved some women like lonely hobbies and there are excellent female mathematicians out there, so there's no big roadblock, except social acceptance. A 10yr old girl spending too much time hacking into a computer is seen as a problem, whereas a boy is considered normal.

      Please. Where I grew up a ten year old boy who spent too much time hacking would only be considered one thing, a social outcast who would be in line for bullying and beating.

      Women and men are different. I grant you that. But most of the difference is socially induced.

      I'll agree that 'much' is socially induced, but I think you're grasping at straws to support your own theory if you think that's anything other than pure speculation at this point. And in the end a persons performance changes depending on the amount of testosterone or estrogen in their system. It seems like hiding your head in the sand if you think that's not going to have any sexualy related performance differences.

  32. Meanwhile, back in 1975-1977 at DEC... by Ian.Waring · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Of the 5 core developers of the VAX/VMS V1.0 kernel, 2 were female. Nancy Kronenberg and Cathy Morse if my memory serves me right. Alongside David Cutler, Richard Hustvedt and another Richard that went to Microsoft via Apple (Pink). Oops, maybe 6 developers - Andy Goldstein on the file system.

  33. I still do by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

    >I've met plenty of women who blow me away

    I still do but lately ... oh well...

    >nerdy males with fewer social skills

    Social skills? What's that? It doesn't mean they exist only in person-to-person communication.
    Take a look at:
    http://www.psc.uc.edu/sh/SH_Social_Skills.htm

    You'll see that by their definition people who live their lives online do have social skills.

    Also the page says that "a failure to learn adequate social skills can lead to feelings of isolation, loneliness, rejection, and poor self-esteem."

    I think most people involved in open source projects actually feel the opposite because of the sense of joint achievement. And while online I don't see as much greed, discrimination, envy and other bad things that I see daily in my offline life.

    From my perspective, online life and most communities are actually healthier than real life that you consider the standard by which you judge others.

    1. Re:I still do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And while online I don't see as much greed, discrimination, envy and other bad things that I see daily in my offline life."

      wtf? you do realize this is /. right?

  34. But i thought women like sex too... by Psymunn · · Score: 1

    So women are never desperate
    I'd say that if a women loses her virginity it is more a result of either her own desperation, or simply her own desire to do so
    Women can be desperate for emotional attachment (as can men) and will use their body to extort a feigned emotional sentiment from a partner. And some women might just want sex (as men most certinally do). The general attitude has been the men are always the sexual initators and that women are the submissive ones yet this attitude is changing as it obviously is not always the case (though, admitidly, the male libido on average, tends to be higher and more influenced by lust)
    Lastly, a vast majority of women are having sex with men. And, while some women are with older guys, most young people date people with in a small deviation of age (just because, these are the peopole they are exposed to through school and work). Therefore, either only a slightly higher percentage of women then men, 20 and below will not be virjins, OR there are a few alpha males devirginising the women populace. I think that the second factor is limited.
    QED women are desperate too, and men fail to remain extra-virginal by the time they reach young adulthood.
    Oh, and women are more social and physically comfortable around each other. Not giong to get into it now but which gender is prone to going to the washroom in pairs...

    --
    The Neo-Bohemian Techno-Socialist
    1. Re:But i thought women like sex too... by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Your theory has one problem, and one that has been shown statistically: Attractive men usually "date" more than one sexual partner at a time.

      Another interresting statistic (from the 70s though):
      About 10% of all men are still virgins then they die.

      So yes there is huge difference in virginity between men and women, especially around the end of the teenage-years. It helps somewhat when the woman reach the mid-20s are starts looking for other things than just appearence in men.

  35. Who says the other two are female? by Crag · · Score: 2, Funny

    It says two exceptions, not two women. They're probably aliens, or dogs, or elder gods or something.

  36. Good news for you by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 2, Informative

    If only you had clicked on the little [1], after the sentence would you have realised that your search space can probably be larger.

    1. There are six names in the Credits file whose gender could not be verified by searches on the Internet or by asking other persons mentioned in the Credits file. As no information indicated that the persons in question would be female, I have made the assumption that they are males.

    The author I guess would be glad if you share the results of your research with him

    (Karma be damned; I am no better than an AC anyway)

  37. How reliable? by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 3, Informative

    Consider the following entry :

    N: Vijaya Chandra
    E: v@tachyontech.net
    W: http://www.tachyontech.net
    D: Stress Tester - /dev/null
    D: Stress Tester - /dev/random

    (You needn't wake up your grep. This entry has been discontinued in the post-0.x kernels)

    Tracerouting to tachyontech.net would tell you that I am in the UK, while only our web/pop servers are in england.

    'Chandra' can either be a male or a female. But the androgynous 'Vijaya' with the 'a' at the ending would score high towards females.

    I would be damnably pi*ed of to find myself considered as a female (unless of course I am thrown into the male-by-default group, which seems to be the case in the article) kernel developer from the UK

    So how reliable can the results of such an evaluation be??

    (Karma be damned; I am no better than an AC anyway)

    1. Re:How reliable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good question! Footnote 1 in the paper says:
      "There are six names in the Credits file whose gender could not be verified by searches on the Internet or by asking other persons mentioned in the Credits file. As no information indicated that the persons in question would be female, I have made the assumption that they are males. This assumption was made for Sam Mosel, Pat Mackinlay, Niibe Yutaka, Chih-Jen Chang, Ani Joshi, and Asit Mallick. In general, as the developers come from many different cultures that have different naming conventions it is not a simple task to categorize them based on gender. Also Linux kernel developers sometimes make mistakes in this regard. For example, in some kernel discussions Andrea Arcangeli is referred to as a female. It may be easy for a Finnish speaker to know that Kai is a male name in Finnish. In some other languages it would be female name."

  38. Found a bug! by iamplasma · · Score: 1
    Hmmmm, I found a kernel bug... in the CREDITS file:
    N: Leonard N. Zubkoff
    W: http://www.dandelion.com/Linux/
    D: BusLogic SCSI driver
    D: Mylex DAC960 PCI RAID driver
    D: Miscellaneous kernel fixes

    N: Alessandro Zummo
    E: azummo@ita.flashnet.it
    W: http://freepage.logicom.it/azummo/
    D: CMI8330 support is sb_card.c
    D: ISAPnP fixes in sb_card.c
    S: Italy

    N: Marc Zyngier
    E: maz@wild-wind.fr.eu.org
    W: http://www.misterjones.org
    D: MD driver
    D: EISA/sysfs subsystem
    S: France

    # Don't add your name here, unless you really _are_ after Marc
    # alphabetically. Leonard used to be very proud of being the
    # last entry, and he'll get positively pissed if he can't even
    # be second-to-last. (and this file really _is_ supposed to be
    # in alphabetic order)
    Or are they just not changing it so that Leonard doesn't catch on and get "positively pissed"?
  39. Oh, what statistical significance! by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    How you do keep US prisons clear of natives, because in Canada natives make up something like 70-80% of the prison population!

    Oh, you don't have as many natives, because you have black people in there? Why would black people commit crimes? Not very many black people are criminal in Canada. This is clearly an error on your prison system's part in assigning the blame to the wrong people, because all natives steal and all women can't write computer code!

    Go read "Black Like Me" before you start stereotyping. The reason female programmers don't contribute is a heady concotion of many social pressures, not the least of which are gender biased people like you.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:Oh, what statistical significance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you don't have as many natives, because you have black people in there? Why would black people commit crimes? Not very many black people are criminal in Canada.

      In comparison you don't have as many black people. They were being taken in at huge amounts in the US, and received a much rougher treatment when they received freedom, earning their decendents a lower socio-economic class. Poor, undereducated, and desperate people with nothing to lose are more likley to commit a crime than the middle class - on average. The reason female programmers don't contribute is a heady concotion of many social pressures

      Yes, because I know that there's sure no negitive social pressures about being a male programmer! Hint: The running joke about slashdot virgins is there for a reason! The difference is that for some reason a far, far greater percentage of males seem to simply not care what society thinks. You're going to find this in anything even remotly extreame, I don't care if it's programming or skydiving.

  40. Results in MS-Excel ? by CrazyPyro · · Score: 1

    Anybody know what program was used to make those graphs? They look like Excel, which would be hilariously ironic for analysing the Linux kernel. Of course, a lot of things look like excel...

  41. Is there an acoustic connection... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    ...between your username (Khazunga) and your tagline?

    If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Is there an acoustic connection... by Khazunga · · Score: 1
      :-) Cool deduction, made me laugh, but nope. Khazunga was my nick when playing Descent, Rise of the Triad or Quake back in the University labs. There lies the accoustic connection. I'd KHAZUNG! my friends, which is way cooler than fragging them!

      The tagline is something I picked up somewhere, while I was reading The Dilbert Principle, where there is a story about a manager who decided that it is possible to make no mistakes in a copy-shop. Heck, if you can make one copy right, you can make 10,000 copies right. My tagline reinforces the reverse of that: Whenever you really want to get something right one time, the first time, you can and do.

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
  42. hyphenate three-word phrases! by spage · · Score: 1
    In his in depth paper

    That should be "in-depth paper" to avoid ambiguity. More on compound words.

    --
    =S