Slashdot Mirror


Moon Rocket Scrubbed and Blown Dry

loid_void writes "Reutersis is reporting that a giant Apollo moon rocket that never got off the ground is about to get a face-lift after years of rusting away in the Texas heat and humidity at the Johnson Space Center. Workers will construct a shelter for the Saturn V rocket and give it the equivalent of a "blow dry" in the first steps to preserve the relic of NASA's golden age, said Allan Needell, Apollo program curator for the Smithsonian Institution's National Air and Space Museum. The 363-foot-long behemoth has lain on its side in front of JSC since 1977, a favorite sight of tourists, but also a victim of the elements. Instead of launching astronauts to the moon as it was built to do, it has become a slowly fading hulk of peeling paint and corroded metal where birds live and plants sprout, Needell said on Wednesday during a visit to the rocket. "There's a lot of biology growing on there," he said, pointing out streaks of algae staining the rocket's white skin."

60 of 305 comments (clear)

  1. Sink it as an artificial reef? by KRYnosemg33 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I know large ships are often sunk as artificial reefs.

    How cool would it be to sink a Saturn V rocket as an artificial reef!

    1. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by ChristTrekker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sink it nose up in 300' deep water.

    2. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by PPGMD · · Score: 2, Insightful
      How cool would it be to sink a Saturn V rocket as an artificial reef!

      No because most people don't realize how massive of an accomplishment it was to get to the moon.

      All of that rocket, fuel, and oxygen to carry the LM, and CSM, which are small in comparison.

    3. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by confused+one · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would be very un-cool.

    4. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Funny

      About as cool as grinding up the Spinx for an artificial reef.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2, Insightful


      How cool would it be to sink a Saturn V rocket as an artificial reef!


      You say this because... why? There's almost as many (somewhat) complete Saturn V rockets as ships? So many that it's hard to come up with contructive uses for them, maybe?
    6. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by mog007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've been to Kennedy Space Center in Florida, and I've looked at the only unlaunched Saturn V. It's the biggest thing I've ever seen. Sure, I've also been to New York and seen the World Trade Center, the Empire State Building, et el., but people don't put billions of pounds of liquid oxygen inside of the Empire State Building, set it on fire, and fly to the moon with it.

    7. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by Ianoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now there's an idea to win the X-Prize!

    8. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      How cool would it be to sink a Saturn V rocket as an artificial reef!


      About as cool as seeing how far it could be shoved up your ass without k-y.

    9. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by cluckshot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are actually 4 unlaunched Saturn V rockets. One is on display at the Kennedy Center, One at the US Space and Rocket Center Huntsville, Alabama and one at Johnson and I understand one more exists elsewhere. These were all built and ready for launch when Americans decided to save money going to pay for their "Welfare State" of the 1970's etc.

      If you want to see how big these are, come to the US Space and Rocket Center in Huntsville, Alabama and there you can see lying down on such rocket and a model standing up. The model is 36 stories tall making it by 25 stories the tallest thing in town other than TV Transmission towers. The fuel tanks for them are so big that a surplus one was made into the dome of the planetarium in Huntsville. The rocket first stage burned 150,000 gallons of fuel a second per each of the 5 engines! I saw the test from my house when I was young. At 9.5 miles range the shaking broke the front window of my house once. The Flames went out about 1 mile or so. It was really quite the thing to see these being transported. In addition I have been on the NASA ships for transporting the boosters.

      Arguing the great cost of such launches is pretty silly when the cost was R&D and Manufacture mostly and that was already out of pocket. This illustrates how STUPID our political discussions get on such issues.

      The B-2 Bomber for example was reported to cost about $2 Billion a plane per the discussion when the project was killed. Actually the production costs were something like $100 Million and the rest was already out of pocket R&D. Ignorant idiots in the media don't understand such things.

      Using the typical Media math the first CPU for a line such as the Pentium V cost something like $1 Billion. The remainder costs just a penny or two to make each. The ammortization would be that if you bought 20 such chips they must cost $50 million a unit. So we shouldn't buy more than 20... Of course buying 100 million units tends to make the cost only $10 a unit... But the reporters would say otherwise.

      This is the high price of moronic reporting. Also when one is at a museum it is often made a claim of the one and only of something when it is not so.

      I came to Huntsville Alabama in 1963 because my father was one of the computer types for the project. I got the inside look see of most of the labs and saw and knew a lot of the inside story on the Saturn rockets. I have also seen the construction of the US parts of the space station and Skylab. Much of this cannot be seen now because Redstone Arsenal is going much more secure. I kind of feel like the old line from the very old movie Camelot.. "Don't let it be forgot.. That once there was a spot..."

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
  2. Jump back! by TigerTale · · Score: 5, Funny

    You mean we used to go to the Moon?

    1. Re:Jump back! by Dausha · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, we didn't. Some people thought it would be a cool prank to spend billions of US dollars to set up a sound stage in Nevada and fake it. They hint at this during Diamonds Are Forever and other sources.

      --
      What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
  3. What a waste by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For all the people who fuss and complain about the money spent on actual space programs, this is a great example of the kind of wastefulness that goes on. And, now, rather than reuse or slag it, even more money will be spent to clean it up and display it. I'd rather see it broken apart, melted and recycled in more useful form than have a never-used moon rocket sitting in a museum.

    --
    I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
    1. Re:What a waste by Nakito · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd rather see it broken apart, melted and recycled in more useful form than have a never-used moon rocket sitting in a museum.

      Going to the moon may have been the greatest single physical achievement of the human race. There are only three remaining examples of the engine that took us there. This is one of them. I say, let's keep it.

    2. Re:What a waste by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yah, God only knows how terrible it would be to preserve a piece of history!

      And we'll we're at it, let's tear down the Washington Monument and make a Parking Garage there! No need to waste all that space and stone when we could make something useful of it...

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    3. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, because the used rockets make such good museum pieces..

      But you're right, there's no sense in remembering things from the past. We should have melted down the Spirit of St. Louis, it has no place taking up space in a building.

      In fact, that whole Smithsonian thing is such a waste! All that valuable real estate, wasted by useless relics of the past.

      .. I really should add something to make it entirely clear I'm being sarcastic.

      "Those who don't learn history are doomed to repeat it's mistakes." - paraphrased from someone famous.

    4. Re:What a waste by Snowdog668 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd have to agree with you here. Especially since according to the article there's two other Saturn V's on display at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida and Marshall Space Center in Alabama. If it were the only one left in existance I might be able to see spending the cash. Since this would be the third museum piece I think that the money would be better spent elsewhere.

      --
      I wouldn't say I'm a bad gambler but the last time I went to Vegas I even lost a buck on the soda machine.
    5. Re:What a waste by MoxCamel · · Score: 2, Insightful
      For all the people who fuss and complain about the money spent on actual space programs, this is a great example of the kind of wastefulness that goes on.

      I agree! And all those stupid dinosaur bones cluttering up our museums...toss em! And all those damned paintings in the Looo-ver--digitize the damn things and burn em. Waste of space!

      ...is what I would have said if I were as ignorant as the original poster. There's probably more than a few scientists and/or astronauts who started down their career path by looking up at that piece of "waste," and thinking how wonderful it would be to be a part of something that great. Some things have more value than just their raw materials.

    6. Re:What a waste by wankledot · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Don't you think it would cost significantly more money to break it up and recycle it, just to get some Al and Fe that could be had elsewhere easier and cheaper?

      The fact that it was not used 30 years ago is wasteful, but recycling it now would be even more of a waste.

      --
      My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    7. Re:What a waste by PPGMD · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Exactly. As a kid I remember standing in front of this rocket at JSC, and saying, "Wow!" Here was the object that took our men to the moon, quite possibly the largest moving vehicle that I have ever seen.

      Years later when I was attending Embry-Riddle in Daytona Beach, I flew down to Titusville to see a friend. I went by the KSC during the evening (before the post 9-11 lock down), here in that night, I could almost feel the power, it was almost as moving as when I was a kid.

      Without the past, people have nothing to aspire to, for most people what's in the books is simply writing, it's no more real than Lord of the Rings, but if you put a kid in the rocket park down there, history comes alive, here is what you are reading about, not just in words, but in towering moments to the men that rode them.

      It inspired me, I would gladly pay for them to be around to inspire future generations.

  4. Re:hrm... by Mz6 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Step 4: Get arrested, thrown in jail and sell your story to the press.

    --
    Hmmm.
  5. NASA's golden age? by Pi_0's+don't+shower · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have to object to referring to the 1960's/70's as NASA's golden age. Surely, that should be regarded as NASA's infancy, and that NASA's golden age may be yet to come? Maybe it's too optimistic, but I'm a 25 year old astrophysics grad student, and I know how much is out there waiting to be explored and examined -- I don't want to have to live my life in the belief that my industry's best days were before I was born!

    1. Re:NASA's golden age? by cerebralsugar · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's not too optimistic at all, it just won't be done by NASA. Everyone who has seen Star Trek knows we will have to have a 3rd world war first, and then a drunken scientist resembling James Cromwell will invent warp drive in an alcoholic haze. Then of course, Starfleet will be borne, and we will all want to shag either that vulcan girl and that hot african communications lady.

      --
      Easy guys, I put my pants on one leg at a time. The difference is after I put on my pants I make gold records!
    2. Re:NASA's golden age? by cmowire · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It all depends.

      The 60s/70s are definately the infancy of humanity in space. They hopefully are *not* the only golden age of humanity in space.

      They may, however, be the golden age of NASA, when NASA could do no wrong.

      It all depends on the next 20 years, I'd say. Will NASA continue to be the only road to space, or will National Geographic or the Discovery Channel be able to mount their own space missions? I mean, the last space IMAX film made 50 million. That doesn't buy you much now, but if launch costs are down, you might be able to fund a mission just for the IMAX film.

      It's really an open question for me if the government, academia, or private industry is best suited to really explore space. Each one has their drawbacks, but so far the government has been in the driver's seat.

      So yeah, there's probably room for a even-more-golden age in the future (call it the palladium age ;) ) but it may not be at NASA's behest.

      Our current Babylon-5-esque best hope for space is probably the garage hacking of Scaled COmposites and Armadillo Aerospace.

    3. Re:NASA's golden age? by Sounder40 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thank goodness for kids like you, because I've lost hope of ever seeing space. As a kid, the goal of space travel for us all seemed so close. We were sending men to the moon all the time, so how long would it take until we could all go?

      As a kid, I grew up wanting to work at NASA like my dad. He worked at JSC (used to be "Manned" Space Center before being renamed after LBJ) from 1963 until 1990. I worked in and around JSC and Marshall Spaceflight Center in Huntsville, Al. for 15 years, and, believe me, a lot of the optimism is gone. It's become too much of a business run by big companies. With the appointment of Sean O'Keefe, I hope that things change. Time will tell.

      --
      A clever person solves a problem, A wise person avoids it. -Einstein
    4. Re:NASA's golden age? by cmowire · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem is, it's harder than you think.

      The real thing that limits space exploration is pretty much cost per pound to orbit. Because it's so damn expensive, you have to make all kinds of nasty comprimizes.

      The problem is that the shuttle never lived up to its promise. It takes far too many people to keep it going and far too expensive.

      The best solution is to retire the shuttle sooner rather than later, stop spaceflight for a few years, and develop something new. However, in doing so, you run the decided risk of being a budget cut target in Congress (And Congressional budget issues is what made the shuttle suck in the first place) and the entire manned space program shut down.

      It doesn't help that the Russians can't keep the ISS going forever with just Soyuz and Progress capsules and that they are, in general, not the best of partners. So if the shuttle is out for another few years, it's highly likely that the ISS will end up like Skylab, which ends up with another hunk of money wasted.

      The problem is, NASA wasn't paid to do things *right* it was paid to do things *fast* and *cheap*. So most of the chances to make the space program more of a long-term thing were passed up, even when they were properly funded and run by the guys with sliderules.

  6. Kansas Cosmosphere by OverlordQ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if they'll have any involvement. After all they single-handedly restored the Liberty Bell 7 (their link here. And also helped with the restoration of the Apollo 13 as well. When you tought of Kansas, you probably didn't think of space now did ya?

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:Kansas Cosmosphere by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sad to say, but I just went through JSC a couple of weeks ago, and I really wasn't impressed.

      This is Johnson freaking Space CENTER for crying out loud - yet the items they had on display at the visitor's center weren't much better than the items in the Hall Of Space at the Cosmosphere - in many ways KSC has them beat (KSC's Redstone rocket is in better shape, KSC has an SR-71 in addition to the T-38, KSC has the original Apollo "White Room").

      Look, JSC *is* NASA - KSC is a private sector organization in the middle of Kansas (more or less).

      It just doesn't seem right for me to be walking around JSC's visitor center saying "Yawn. Ho-hum. Got anything better?"

    2. Re:Kansas Cosmosphere by daeley · · Score: 5, Funny

      When you tought of Kansas, you probably didn't think of space now did ya?

      Having suffered through several cross-Kansas drives during Summer vacation trips as a kid, I can tell you there is just about nothing *but* space in Kansas. ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  7. An important piece of history by Sean80 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Obviously, for any geek worth their stripes, the Saturn V rockets are a pretty awesome piece of history. Well, for this geek at least. It honestly surprises me that they let it come to this in the first place. Does anybody know what the condition of the other 2 is? How was it that this one was not deemed historically significant enough to be taken of?

    Although I've lived in the US for a few years now, I've never had the opportunity to go see some of this stuff. Seeing this thing cleaned up and in a permanent display will definitely be worth the price of admission.

    1. Re:An important piece of history by Gunfighter · · Score: 3, Informative

      With most of the Saturn V rockets weathering away thanks to the elements, I can not stress what a difference it can make to actually go to the Kennedy Space Center and see the restored Saturn V inside the (air conditioned... thank heavens) Apollo/Saturn V Center. Not only do you get the to see the rocket itself, but they also have a full blown tour complete with a view of the launch pads and (for us geeks) the actual consoles used at launch control. Definitely worth a visit.

      Side note: If you stay in the Cocoa Beach area overnight, make sure you book yourself on the big casino cruise boat for that evening. Even if you don't gamble, it's free, fun, and the buffet rocks.

      --
      -- Stu

      /. ID under 2,000. I feel old now.
    2. Re:An important piece of history by willith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wikipedia has an extremely informative entry on the Saturn V, which includes a neat table of Saturn V launches and a note about the three Saturn Vs on display. Quoting:

      Currently there are three Saturn Vs on display:

      * At the Johnson Space Center made up of first stage of SA-514, the second stage from SA-515 and the third stage from SA-513

      * At the Kennedy Space Center made up of S-IC-T and the second and third stages from SA-514

      * At the US Space & Rocket Center, Huntsville, Alabama made up of S-IC-D, S-II-F/D and S-IVB-D (all test stages not meant for actual flight)

      Of these three, only the one at the Johnson Space Center is fully comprised of stages that were meant to be launched.

      The third stage of the JSC Saturn V is the one that was removed from SA-513 in 1973 to make room for Skylab.

      I've lived in Clear Lake for my whole life, and the Saturn V at JSC is a familiar landmark. I can't imagine my drive to work without it, and it's a good thing that NASA is going to clean it up. It is a truly awesome sight.

  8. Let's make it into a diner! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Funny

    And in honor of the Saturn V incredible amount of thrust, we'll only serve partially-cooked Mexican food, broccoli and Velamints!

  9. Re:hrm... by Kenshin · · Score: 3, Funny

    Step 0: Buy a dictionary.

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  10. not a waste- good for morale and education by jpnews · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I live in Houston and I've visited JSC a lot of times through the years. The Saturn V is in bad condition, and has been steadily getting worse. Something surely needs to be done.

    And to those who have called it a waste of resources, I have only this to say. All the money in the world won't be of any use if we don't create another generation of engineers and scientists. I've personally seen the look in a kid's eyes when they get up close to something enormous and meaningful. You just can't buy that.

  11. YES! by Sounder40 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I drive past it several times a week (down Saturn Drive for the locals), and it just makes me sick to see it in the shape it's in. Thank God it's finally going to be taken care of and treated as the treasure it is. The pictures don't do justice to the damage being done to the ship.

    By the way, as a teenager, I was horrified to hear that they were going to display it on its side. I thought for sure that it was going to be displayed upright. What a dweeb I was (am?). Yeah, that would be great: make it so you could only see the bottom. And then there's the problems it would cause with low-flying aircraft, (lots of them, including those annoying advertizement-pulling planes). Oh, and we get hurricanes down here in these parts.

    --
    A clever person solves a problem, A wise person avoids it. -Einstein
    1. Re:YES! by nanter · · Score: 3, Informative
      In Huntsville, Alabama, they have an old Saturn rocket that is displayed upright at the U.S. Space and Rocket Center.

      Quite a sight when flying in. You you weren't that much of a dweeb for thinking they would do the same with that rocket.

  12. Re:hrm... by BabyDave · · Score: 4, Funny

    These days, it's more like

    Step 4: Get taken to Guantanamo Bay
    Step 5: ????
    Step 6: ????
    Step 7: ????
    Step 8: ????
    Step 9: ????
    ...

  13. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  14. Novel use for old rocket by OriginalArlen · · Score: 3, Funny

    Surely it's obvious that, in the interests of science, this rocket should be renovated, refueled, and have a Chevy Impala tacked on the top, where it lies.

    --

    Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
  15. One in Huntsville, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    A similar effort is under way at the U.S. Space and Rocket Center in Huntsville, Alabama. In fact, they've created a special license plate to help raise funds. Otherwise, the Smithsonian has threatened to take the Saturn V back. (Which would certainly be an interesting sight.) You can see the license plate at the bottom of this page.

  16. Plastic by DaveKAO · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought Saturn's used plastic body panels and therefore couldn't rust? Oh wait... that's the car company.

  17. do something useful by real+gumby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The best way to honor the memory of "NASA's golden age" would be to top it.

    NASA does excellent unmanned science, but the moon shot, cool as it was, wasn't good science or space policy.

    Good thing private efforts are starting to pick up the slack.

    I must add that the most awe-inspiring thing to me is that all the construction, design and launch was done on slide rules.

  18. Re:Another waste of money by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What do you think happened to that money? They laminated $100 bills and used that for the skin?

    No. A whole bunch of contractor companies were hired to design, build, and test parts of it. Companies that hired people. Thousands of skilled people. People that got paid a good salary for a good days work. People that supported tens of thousands of other people by buying food, clothes, cars, houses.

    So it didn't get used. The budget and interest ran out. A shame, but not like the money was wasted.

    What would you prefer we have done with that money? Collect taxes and merely give it away?

  19. Re:Another waste of money by Flying+Purple+Wombat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They ought to auction it on ebay. I wonder what it would go for...

    --
    If God had meant for man to see the sunrise, He would have scheduled it later in the day.
  20. Thank God? by DaveKAO · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't you mean thank the American tax payer?

  21. Saturn V Engines by Sounder40 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I was at Marshall Spaceflight Center in Huntsville, Al., they used to test the SSME (Space Shuttle Main Engines) at a test stand a few miles from my building. I was amazed at the power and noise of the SSMEs until an oldtimer told me what it was like when they tested one of the Saturn V engines: He said your coffee cup would literally bounce off of the desk, and forget talking on the phone during a test fire. And that was just the one engine. Imagine what it was like when they all fired at the same time...

    --
    A clever person solves a problem, A wise person avoids it. -Einstein
    1. Re:Saturn V Engines by domodude · · Score: 4, Interesting

      All of that testing actually worked. Not one of the 32 Saturn V rockets ever exploded; this is amazing when you think of how there are literally millions of parts that could break and cause a critical failure. Wernher von Braun, who also helped with the German V2 rocket, truly was a genius.

    2. Re:Saturn V Engines by demonbug · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was curious, so I looked up the output of the Shuttle's main engines compared to the Saturn V main engines.
      The shuttle's main engines produce a maximum of 488,000 pounds of thrust. The Saturn V main engines produced a total of 7.5 million pounds of thrust, or 1.5 million pounds per engine. So it looks like each engine on the Saturn V was about 3 times as powerful as each of the main engines on the shuttle.
      Oh, the solid rocket boosters on the shuttle each produce 3.3 million pounds of thrust.

  22. Re:Great pick-up line... by .com+b4+.storm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Am I the only one who sees this as a great pick up line?
    [. . .]
    Random gal: *SLAP*

    This is why us geeks can't get chicks. Our definition of a "great" pickup line is the one that generates the hardest slap. :)

    --
    "Wow, you're like some kind of superhero able to ward off happiness and success at every turn."
    -- Ryan Stiles
  23. What a waste, indeed. by StarKruzr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It made me sad, actually. Something kept telling me "this ship was supposed to go to the moon, and it's here because it didn't."

    Call me sentimental, but she looked like a giant failure of human exploration to me.

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:What a waste, indeed. by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps in the grand scheme of things that one rocket's purpose is to remind us of what we've accomplished before, and to inspire us to further greatness.

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
  24. Re:Another waste of money by Elentar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's a good statement to be made here about the implied social contract that a representative government makes with it's citizens. As the US population continues to grow, the percentage of people with no marketable skills will likewise continue to increase. And if our society is going to support the idea that we can keep producing more people despite the fact that there are less resources available for them, we need to find a way to keep everyone happy and feeling productive, without overburdening the government or creating a negative social status (welfare).

    Put simply, the government needs to be able to support people who want to be artists, writers, musicians, hobbyists, explorers, naturalists, scientists, inventors, or any other interest that involves individual dedication and creativity. The product of the work those people do would be public domain, benefitting everyone, without consuming many resources or putting taxpayer's money to poor use. Meanwhile, anyone with a line on a normal form of employment or who wished to retain ownership of their works would follow the normal, self-supported way of life we all try to have today. Anybody could choose which path to take, and the cost of the system is not as high as you think - it doesn't take much money to pay someone a basic income to relax at home and write poetry. And by supporting people's interests we would be encouraging people to follow them, rather than paying based on the number of children a welfare family can crank out, as we do today.

    Until recently, Oxford, Cambridge and other universities in the UK were completely free for citizens to attend. Graduates of those institutions could go on to hold a post with the government, researching various things for a moderate income for all their lives. This is the way things should be, not requiring students to pay hundreds of thousand of dollars to feed the over-inflated salaries of university administrators and who then must accept positions that often encourage them to bend their ethics for the purposes of a greedy individual or corporation.

    The government _SHOULD_ be "wasting" millions of dollars paying people to do things like develop a space program. It has benefited us all and cost us much less than the 'war on terror', which has left us only with degraded individual freedoms, dead men and women from mostly lower-income families and more millions into the bank accounts of the businessmen who engineered the whole thing. Thank you, Cheney.

    -Elentar

    --
    The wheel it turns, around and around, with an ancient rumbling sound.
  25. Beware of self-fulfilling prophecies by boredman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Corny as this may sound, bleak outlooks on the future, however "justified," tend to produce bleak futures. The inverse is also true.

    As I've said in more than a few other space related threads, I became an engineer because of Apollo. Despite my mild depression, the space program has instilled in me a sense of optimism and purpose I just can't shake. As long as there are bright people with big dreams, we're in for greater days, I promise.

    On a more personal note, if you're young, remember that your life is just beginning and, given enough hard work, courage, and luck, you might just help bring about the next golden age.

    If you're older, and forgive me because I can't help but be rude here, please don't infect our youth with that nonsense. They need all the hope they can get.

  26. Apollo 18 by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I worked at the Johnson Space Center for two years, back in 1976-1978, and I was there when they brought in the Saturn V.

    This was actual flight hardware that was supposed to have gone to the moon for the Apollo 18 mission. When they brought it in, it still had red "Remove before flight" tags hanging from various places.

    I am ... really annoyed, saddened, and angry that NASA has let this vehicle rot away.

  27. It's the Definition of "Rock-N-Roll"!!! by Gigantic1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I never saw the Saturn Launch (THE BIG KAHUNA), but I did see a night launch of the Shuttle once from a friend's yard that was 15 miles away from the Launch Gantry.

    I could not see the Gantry, so I had to wait 'till it came over the trees. It was a moonless night. The moment it was ignited, and minutes before I saw it, the sky turned an acetylene-yellow and night became as day. Had I been driving on Interstate 95 there is no doubt I could have turned of my lights and drivrn in complete safety at 70+ MPH: it was THAT bright. About 30 seconds later, the groundwave hit and set of every car alarm in the neighborhood, made every garage door rattle and got every dog withing miles howlin' thier arses off. About a minute or so afterwards, the rumble of the motors was heard.

    An additional minute passed before it came over the trees and headed North.

    What a beast of a machine. I bet the Saturn was at least twice as impressive.

    Rock-N-Roll!!!

    Yeah...I think this beast is worth saving.

  28. Someone has to say it... by slurpburp · · Score: 3, Funny

    I am also in possesion of a rocket which has been neglected for far too long. Where do I sign up to have it 'scrubed and blown'?

  29. Re:hrm... by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or steel one.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  30. May have happened by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All the launched Saturn V first and second stages are somewhere on the ocean floor. I doubt if they're at reef depth, though.

    --
    The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
  31. Re:My goodness.... by trentblase · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey, I just developed that zero-friction oil you mentioned. It must be worth billions, but the government here in Nigeria won't let me release it to the outside world. Tell you what... just send me $10,000 to help smuggle me out and I'll split the proceeds of my invention with you 50/50.