Slashdot Mirror


German Court Fixes Book Prices On Ebay

krez writes "Yesterday, a German court decided that it is illegal to sell books below the prices set by publishing houses. In the court's view, German books are exempt from EU free-market restrictions because they represent an "important cultural good". I guess this is what happens when the rights of collectives, and groups of peoples supersede the rights of the individual to do with his property as he/she sees fit. The implications of this could be far reaching, having an impact on your right to sell old CDs, DVDs, perhaps even art?"

77 comments

  1. At least it does in Germany.. by cfoster611 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Though the way international law works these days, it wouldn't surprise me to see this judgment fester and infect those of other EU member states or even the US.

    --
    --- Kicking the Cheat since late 2002
  2. nothing new at all by fluxmov · · Score: 5, Informative

    The German "Buchpreisbindung" (fixed prices for professional sellers) has been in effect for a long time. It has nothing to do with DVDs etc. The only "new" thing about it is the court's decision that it's also valid for eBay, which doesn't really come as a surprise.

    1. Re:nothing new at all by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      According to the article this does not affect people who sell used books and collectibles? "The court's decision made clear that even private sellers have to stick to the fixed book price if they regularly sell new books."

      What this ruling (and the law it's based on) also does is prevent companies like Barnes & Noble from selling at prices below cover, to the detriment of smaller book-sellers who don't get the same volume discounts. Wonder if this applies to the German arm of Amazon, too?

      Note: I do not favor of this type of regulation, especially the way it was used, which was to prevent a person (a book reviewer) who was given free copies of the books from reselling those copies at below cover price.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    2. Re:nothing new at all by Specialist2k · · Score: 3, Informative
      According to the article this does not affect people who sell used books and collectibles?

      Exactly. The German "Buchpreisbindung" is only in effect for new, but not for used books.

    3. Re:nothing new at all by Alsee · · Score: 1

      is only in effect for new, but not for used books.

      No your honor, I was not selling new books below the legally permissable price. These are used books. I read the title on the cover before selling them.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  3. i can see it now. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hi. You are not bidding on this copy of harry potter starting at 1$, you are bidding on this extriemely durable shipping container. The book is merely being included to keep the container from blowing away or being crushed during shipping. THank you.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:i can see it now. by Apiakun · · Score: 5, Funny

      Great idea :) "We are not offering the following unreleased album in mp3 format. We are simply providing a collection of ones and zeros with which you can test your ISP's downstream connection. We insist that you not save this data upon completion of the network bandwidth test."

    2. Re:i can see it now. by GimmeFuel · · Score: 1
      This gives me an interesting idea - take some copyrighted file and encrypt it with a weak password - using RAR, AES, whatever. Change the extension and offer it for download as "large blocks of pseudorandom data for scientific applications". You could even use a file splitter to split it so you don't have a bunch of conspicuous 700mb filesizes. Then a master list would be made telling you what to download for which files - ie files 1, 3, 7 and 14 make up such and such.

      I've never heard of it done before, but it seems simple enough that somebody must have. Anyone know if it's already been done, and if so, what the outcome was?

  4. ridiculous.. by gl4ss · · Score: 1, Redundant

    and will never stay up when taken higher..

    The publisher sold the books anyways already ONCE...

    .

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:ridiculous.. by peeping_Thomist · · Score: 1

      and will never stay up when taken higher..

      Do you know anything about the German legal system? Or do you just think that a higher court should overturn this decision because it's unreasonable?

      --
      Anything worth doing is worth doing badly -- G.K. Chesterton
    2. Re:ridiculous.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you RTFA? The books were given away free as review copies.

    3. Re:ridiculous.. by tha_mink · · Score: 1

      Did you RTFA? The books were given away free as review copies.

      Did you even RTFA? That was ONE case. The law applies to all literature sales. The review copies was just one single case and it was unclear how the law might apply to used books. If it applies to used books then you can't sell a tattered, weathered copy of a book with missing pages for less than the value set by the publisher? Surely a review copy could count as a "Used" book. (taken literally of course) I wonder if that's the case?

      --
      You'll have that sometimes...
    4. Re:ridiculous.. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      *Do you know anything about the German legal system? Or do you just think that a higher court should overturn this decision because it's unreasonable?*

      huh, they could always go bitch about into the EU's legal organ meant for such bitching after they run out of german systems to bitch in. that's what we Finns do anyways when we think that the parliament is trying to give us only the parts of EU it wants(look, we want to bring cheap cars and cheap booze from other EU countries, we really do! but that didn't mean the goverment would fess up without major bitching about it).

      In this case anyways the publisher should have put some strings to the books it was giving away..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:ridiculous.. by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      Seems that all the reviewer would actually have to do is do his job by reading the books. Then the books would be "used" by any definition and he could sell them.

      He simply couldn't sell shrink-wrapped new books as new anymore.

      Not that I'm for the law, or the petty lawsuit, but there certainly are ways around it.

      D

  5. Right of First Sale? by Chilltowner · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am totally ignorant of German law, but is there a German (or EU) principle in copyright similar to the American right of first sale? Basically, in the States, "once a copyright owner sells a copy of his work to another, the copyright owner relinquishes all further rights to sell or otherwise dispose of that copy." Does this not pertain in Europe? When do the copyright owner's rights end? Do they ever? This could be a dangerous precedent, especially if it contradicts the established legal tradition.

    1. Re:Right of First Sale? by sapbasisnerd · · Score: 3, Informative

      RTFA this decision is about selling NEW books. It does not conflict with Right of First Sale.

    2. Re:Right of First Sale? by ctr2sprt · · Score: 1
      Reread the original post, then think about how books get from the publisher to your hands. That's right, they're sold by the publisher to the bookstore (or eBay seller). That's the first sale, and that's what this ruling is all about. If you buy a book from someone (not the publisher) and then resell it, you're really selling a used book, even if you've never read it.

      So yeah, this decision is specifically about the right of first sale; or rather, it's saying that there is no such right in Germany when it comes to books.

    3. Re:Right of First Sale? by E_elven · · Score: 1

      Good point, though the sale from manufacturer to retailer may not be considered to be the 'first sale'. I'm not absolutely sure of the legalities of this in any part of the world, but that interpretation has stuck to my head for some reason.

      --
      Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
    4. Re:Right of First Sale? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative


      There's two simple answers to this:

      First, you don't know the publishing business. (I've spent 6 years in it.) Publishers deal with bookshops on a "sale or return" basis. The publisher only gets the money on books that are actually sold by the bookstore; unsold ones are returned. So really, there is no sale from the publisher to the bookstore: the publisher just supplies the bookstore with books and takes a cut on whateve gets sold.

      Secondly, the publisher can set a resale price with the bookstore as part of its agreement to supply the books. First sale rights can be overriden by contractual agreements between the parties.

  6. RTA by blankmange · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This is also in Germany and there is one interesting note in the article:

    "The court's decision made clear that even private sellers have to stick to the fixed book price if they regularly sell new books. "

    Looks like if they are used books, you have no restrictions... now we have to have "used" defined...
    --
    ...we are from the government - we are here to help...
    1. Re:RTA by dmayle · · Score: 3, Funny

      Buy fantastic used books!!! Just Like New(TM)

    2. Re:RTA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I Can't Believe It's Not A New Book (tm)

      Seriously though, this is exactly why we have judges, to strike down on idiotic attempts at exploiting perceived loopholes that would only be visible to pedantic programmer types. If the judge thinks you sound like a professional seller of new books, that's what he'll consider you to be regardless of any rhetoric to the contrary on your side.

  7. It's not over yet... by Gadzinka · · Score: 1

    It's not over yet. There are higher level courts in Germany and EU, aren't there? I bet they won't see German books as important enough cultural good to exempt them from EU free market.

    --
    Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162
    1. Re:It's not over yet... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      There is one higher level court in Germany and one in Europe. And the EU is okay with the law as it stands (one and two).

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  8. Like scalping tickets... by svenjob · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's similar to not being able to sell tickets for a sporting event or concert to people below their listed price.

    --

    Totally Life!

    ALL replies

    1. Re:Like scalping tickets... by Phleg · · Score: 4, Informative

      Er, scalping tickets is when you sell tickets above their listed price. The problem is that tickets inherently have a limited utility, and supply decreases towards their end-of-life (hence, raising their value and price). That way, one person might buy 100 tickets for a show that will be sold out, and sell them with a 200% markup to fans outside the stadium, since there's effectively a zero supply.

      --
      No comment.
    2. Re:Like scalping tickets... by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Doesn't Ticketmaster effectively do the same thing? Why should it be any more legal for them to buy up tickets and set a price? They have a contract? Every time you sell a ticket, it's a contract. A ticket is a seat. If they don't want people to be scalping tickets, then they shouldn't sell lots of tickets to the same person. The stupidity is that there's nothing stopping a place from doing *exactly* what the scalper does, since it's the same idea that airlines use for tickets. If a scalper is willing to take the risk and a company is fine with decreasing risk by large ticket sales to a buyer (which in some ways implies scalping), it's their choice. And then people can boycott such companies and their scalper *cough*Ticketmaster/Airlines*cough* because they don't like feeling cheated (notice feeling cheated is a question of moral fairness, not law).

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
  9. First Sale Doctrine? by image · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So I take it that German copyright law doesn't include the same Right Of First Sale that the U.S. law does? Basically, U.S. law gives us the right to resell, or rent, copyrighted works. The VHS rental market would never have taken off if not for the right of first sale, for example.

    I'm no expert on this though, especially not for European laws -- can someone comment on why Germany can get away with this?

    1. Re:First Sale Doctrine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first DVD I pick out says the following on the back:
      ``WARNING: This DVD is protected by law. Unorthorised copying, hiring, lending or public performance of this DVD is subject to a severe civil and/or criminal penalties. Authorised for home use only, any other use is strictly prohibited.''

      It's the same with most DVDs/videos and games I believe (at least in the UK). You have to get special copies if you're renting them out. The lending part is something I haven't noticed before.

    2. Re:First Sale Doctrine? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      This is not true in the US, by and large. You can buy copies of videos off of Amazon and rent them out as you like. However, it is common for studios to sell copies in advance of the retail release date, at a high markup. Since rental places will want to rent as soon as possible, and before people can easily and cheaply buy the copies, they'll pay extra. This isn't for the right to rent them, which merely runs with the ownership of the copy itself, but for getting them as quickly as possible.

      At any rate, little notices like that generally don't mean shit. Think about what it's saying: It says that there _might_ be laws that _might_ prohibit you from doing things. OTOH, there might not be, and what laws there are might let you do some of that stuff, or might prohibit other things not on the list. It's merely a (horribly bad) restatement of something external, not controlling in itself. (e.g. if I sold you sugar, and cautioned you that sugar was a controlled substance, it's still legal to possess it, even though you think it isn't; your confusion doesn't have the force of law) Likewise, while they might authorize home usage, it's likely that they have no power, given the law, to deny you home usage. They can only deny you things that the law lets them deny you. So a denial of non-home usage is itself whittled down to the non-home usage that they have the legal right to prohibit.

      Warnings like that are just FUD, basically. If they were serious about it, it'd be much more EULA like (a contract certainly isn't a contract, after all, unless people can tell that you MEAN for it to be a contract, and even then it depends) and you'd be able to tell the difference.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  10. A Good Thing (tm) by straybullets · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In France the price of books is fixed by law, and is allowed only a very small variance (along the lines of 5%, and only for special operations i think). The direct consequence of this is that you can still find small and/or specialized bookshops in almost every part town .

    Now, this is not the case for records. As a direct result there is very few specialized/independant recordshops left since the buying power of them hudge megastores allowed for unrivalled price and almost no independant recordshop survived.
    Consequence : everybody goes dumb from hearing the lame music the megastore sells & promote.
    Moreover the price is not that low either, since they are the only one left and can do as they please.

    --
    With that aggravating beauty, Lulu Walls.
    1. Re:A Good Thing (tm) by cosmodrome · · Score: 0

      If people demand the products that the small stores are selling, they will continue to buy it. Forcing prices to be abnormally high by restricting competition impoverishes everyone to promote the welfare of the few.

    2. Re:A Good Thing (tm) by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      (Sarcasstic, but not really) Wow, everyone pays more so that some businesses can make a profit. I had no idea Europeans were, despite protestations to the contrary, so dominated by the concerns of business!

    3. Re:A Good Thing (tm) by ZorroXXX · · Score: 1
      There is similar (I guess) price fixing on books here in Norway.

      Books (and newspapers) are also except VAT.

      --
      When you are sure of something, you probably are wrong (search for "Unskilled and Unaware of It").
    4. Re:A Good Thing (tm) by straybullets · · Score: 1

      If people demand the products that the small stores are selling, they will continue to buy it
      That's theory. Real life is like this : small shop sells product XYZ, so does Megastore but cheaper. Small shop closes. Megastore discontinues product XYZ because it doesn't sell enough and is therefore more of a cost than a gain. Megastores eventually keep some XYZ variants as an alibi.

      Forcing prices to be abnormally high
      Things have a value. This phrase should be : fixing price so they don't fall abnormally low.

      restricting competition impoverishes everyone to promote the welfare of the few
      That's right, wait until we ship your job to Bangalore, so that the price can fall down a little lower.

      --
      With that aggravating beauty, Lulu Walls.
    5. Re:A Good Thing (tm) by straybullets · · Score: 1

      everyone pays more
      I don't know : my music is cheaper in indie stores, because it does not come with expensive ad campains et al.
      Granted it's not the same music but I think it's a general consensus that the price of records is too high, and this is in a model that includes the no-price-limit & megastore.

      --
      With that aggravating beauty, Lulu Walls.
    6. Re:A Good Thing (tm) by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      but I think it's a general consensus that the price of records is too high

      A general consensus? A consensus consisting of who exactly? The millions of people who buy CD's? If there was truly a consensus as you claim, people wouldn't buy CD's.

    7. Re:A Good Thing (tm) by cranos · · Score: 1

      OKay I'm going to nit pick here. Just because there is a consensus that CD prices are too high doesn't automatically mean that people will stop buying them.

      A consensus is an agreement, that is all. What action is taken from there is up to the parties involved.

    8. Re:A Good Thing (tm) by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      I dont agree with your assertion. Every time anyone buys something they are making a decision: "Is product X worth Y dollars to me?"

      If people are buying CD's at there current cost, people clearly value CD's worth Y dollars. This is a personal decision. Where do you get this nebulous concept of a imaginary consensus, and what prices "should" be? Prices are what they are, and as long as people are buying, this isn't likely to change.

    9. Re:A Good Thing (tm) by tepples · · Score: 1

      This phrase should be : fixing price so they don't fall abnormally low.

      What if "abnormally low" is where the supply curve meets the demand curve? Then any price floor creates a net deadweight loss to society.

  11. Used to be similer in UK by L-s-L69 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Over here prices where set, but the big sellers got together and refused to stock a publishers books unless the let them set the price. A court case followed which the sellers won. I encourage Germans to ignore the rule and hope the law sees sense.

    1. Re:Used to be similer in UK by Yokaze · · Score: 1

      > A court case followed which the sellers won.

      They won against the Net Book Association because the legislation was a restriction of trade between the states, as it also restricted the sells in Ireland, and from other countries to the UK. This is prohibited by the EU.

      The publishers simply gave up, because the sellers imported the books from the US.

      > I encourage Germans to ignore the rule and hope the law sees sense.

      A similar law in France was abolished in 1979. After seeing the detrimental results of the abolishment (FNAC, loss of diversity), the law was reintroduced in 1981.

      Besides, there are more ways to compete than lowering by lowering price. And how many people aren't buying (more) books, because they are to expensive? Next to no one?

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    2. Re:Used to be similer in UK by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Me. I don't pay list price for books, 5.99 - 7.99 for a paper back is a joke.

  12. Effectively kills 1st sale law and used market by Jesrad · · Score: 0, Redundant

    No one in his/her right mind will buy a used book and pay the same price as for a new one PLUS shipping. This decision litterally kills 1st sale law, which used to give individuals the right to do as they please with their owned goods: you're not allowed to sell under the given price, and no one will buy from you anyway.

    So now the german book publishing industry has neatly buried its biggest competitor (their own customers!) through litigation. This is a sad day for individual freedoms.

    --
    Maybe we deserve this world ?
    1. Re:Effectively kills 1st sale law and used market by sapbasisnerd · · Score: 1

      RTFA, this is about selling NEW books at discunt prices. Nothing about used books.

    2. Re:Effectively kills 1st sale law and used market by Lars+T. · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Blah-Blah. This is a German case, only valid in Germany for German language books following a rule that has been in effect for about 100 years.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  13. Well, expect it's the opposite by JMZero · · Score: 1

    Scalpers wouldn't do very well if they sold tickets below the price they paid for them. In fact, I think it's legal in most places to sell the tickets you bought for less than their listed price - the problem is people who make money reselling them at higher prices.

    If someone was buying up every copy of a book and then ransoming them on EBay for huge prices, that would be a different situation. It also wouldn't work, as if a book is scarce they just print more. They can't just print more seats in a stadium. Scalping did work (for some) with PS2's and other rare commodities.

    --
    Let's not stir that bag of worms...
  14. Only for New Books by osiris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This restriction is only on the selling of new books. You can still sell your second hand books on there below the list price.

    If you didnt read the article, it was a suit brought about by a bookseller against a reviewer who was selling unread review copies of books on ebay for under the new selling price.

    I know its slashdot, but try reading the links sometimes. It helps when you want to discuss it.

    1. Re:Only for New Books by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Minor correction: "The court's decision made clear that even private sellers have to stick to the fixed book price if they regularly sell new books." So you can still sell new books for as low as you want on occasion.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    2. Re:Only for New Books by Suppafly · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you didnt read the article, it was a suit brought about by a bookseller against a reviewer who was selling unread review copies of books on ebay for under the new selling price.

      That would fit the definition of used to most people.. It was sent via mail to someone who took it out of the package and let it sit around their house.. Whether or not you actually read a book doesn't matter. I've sold tons of used college books where the only thing used about them is that they sat around for a semester.

    3. Re:Only for New Books by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Of course, in the US, review copies, if they are distinct from release copies demand a premium.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  15. about European price fixing on books: by thomastheo1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First off, This court case is about a journalist selling free samples, effectively first sales of those copies, on Ebay. It has nothing to do with used book trade, which is flourishing here, and will continue to do so. About the price fixing of books, which could be considered as a good thing: Most european countries have laws which govern the price of books. The price is fixed, so that small specialty stores will not be outcompeted by big companies, and so that a wide variety in literature is maintained. The idea is that a fixed price for all books will allow publishers to keep publishing books that perhaps are not destined to become as popular as the next harry potter, with popular titles supporting the less popular ones.

    1. Re:about European price fixing on books: by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      A shame to see that corporate welfare is not limited to the US.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    2. Re:about European price fixing on books: by thomastheo1 · · Score: 1

      sorry, but I dont see how corporate welfare has anything to do with previous post.

    3. Re:about European price fixing on books: by cosmodrome · · Score: 0

      Welfare for the small book store at the expense of everyone else. By restricting competition, the entire book buying market is impoverished. If people are truly demanding the varied specialized books the government is supposedly protecting, why should they need special welfare from the government?

  16. Just one more restriction on top of so many by real+gumby · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Yesterday, a German court decided that it is illegal to sell books below the prices set by publishing houses...The implications of this could be far reaching, having an impact on your right to sell old CDs, DVDs, perhaps even art
    Your right to sell art is already controlled in at least three ways:
    1. Certain subjects are verboten
    2. Resale of art is controlled; you are required to rebate part of your sale to the original artist(!) (droit d'auteur)
    3. They're subject to VAT

    And of course books are sold shrink-wrapped so you really have to judge the book by its cover!

    But you know Germany is full of anticonsumer laws (lifetime guarantees forbidden, shops may not open on Sunday, sales (discounts) are only permitted twice a year, etc) so this is just one among many.

  17. Germany is a socialist country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It would be very unsocialist and not to mention discriminatory (which is banned under German law as a hate crime) to allow competition based on price because it would result in only popular books being sold and so a valuable work like Das Capital couldn't be sold in book stores because it has to make space for some drivel from a capitalist pulp writer.

  18. Applies only to new books by Florian · · Score: 4, Informative

    In Germany and Austria, prices for new books are fixed, i.e. a new book
    always costs the same in every bookstore, including web
    bookstores like Amazon, so that bookstores don't compete on price.
    It does, however, not apply to (a) used books, (b) books
    where the rest of an edition is being discounted by the
    publishers, (c) books imported from other countries, (d) any other media, like music CDs, DVDs, software etc..

    This law was made to protect small bookstores with chiefly literary,
    cultural and academic programs from the competition of bookstore
    chains (like Barnes & Noble in the U.S.) and mail order bookstores.
    While one might have different opinions about free markets and free
    pricing, this system indeed works as intended. Unlike in other Western
    countries, Germany and Austria benefit from a wealth of small quality bookstores
    in every town. In addition, there exists - since decades - a very efficient
    national book wholesaler system,
    so that any bookstore, regardless the size, can get any available book
    for a customer usually on the next day (if it's not on stock in the
    store already). Despite all this, Amazon still managed to
    establish a hugely profitable business in Germany for various reasons -
    the comfort of browsing an online catalogue and because
    they offered, for the first time in Germany, an efficient way of ordering
    English-language books.

    The court decision simply maintains the fixed book price law for Ebay sales of
    new books by commercial traders. It does not apply to Ebay sales of
    second-hand books.

    -F

    --
    gopher://cramer.plaintext.cc http://cramer.plaintext.cc:70
    1. Re:Applies only to new books by cosmodrome · · Score: 0

      If Germany and Austria truly benefited from having small bookstores around, they would not need special government help to survive. The 'benefit' in this case is not to consumers, but to the small bookstore owners, at the expense of everyone who buys books.

    2. Re:Applies only to new books by misterpies · · Score: 1


      Well, I've lived in London, Paris and Boston, and didn't notice any shortage of independent bookstores in any of those places. They survive because they specialise in the sort of books you don't find in Barnes & Noble or Borders. E.g. in London there are many thriving bookstores specialising in travel, cookery, art, politics, law, poetry, feminism, foreign literature and many other topics.

      It's true that there are not that many independent bookstores surviving on selling popular titles, because they can't compete with the big boys on price. But the only people who lose out from this are independent bookstore owners. The public still has just as wide a selection as before, if not wider.

      --
      The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
  19. like all things German by thebdj · · Score: 0, Troll

    It will invade France.

    --
    "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb."
    1. Re:like all things German by Kobal · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but it went the other way around this time. This type of law was passed in France, before Germany, to protect the independent publishing houses from the grey-area practices of superstores (back margins).

    2. Re:like all things German by thebdj · · Score: 1

      so the french are getting back for that WW2 thing huh?

      --
      "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb."
  20. RTFA by selfsealingstembolt · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Only if you sell new books, you have to stick to the fixed prices. And that is what we call "Buchpreisbindung". It guarantees the same price for a book in Austria, Germany and Switzerland and it has good reasons. Basically, if you let resellers set the price, rarely bought books will cost much more, and only the few bestsellers will be cheap.

    See this (translation).

    This ensures that everyone is able to read books he or she likes, and not only what the masses dictate. Also it allows a publisher to try out something new, without so much risk.

    --
    Keep open minded - but not that open your brain falls out...
    1. Re:RTFA by Nephilium · · Score: 1

      For this... what do you define as a rarely bought book?

      Speaking as ignorant American... but the biggest variance in prices for books [fiction] is the format you buy them in (hardcover, paperback, trade paperback). I can find old E.E. Smith trade paperbacks for $13. And there is whole piles of rarely bought books... all for the same price as that POS bestseller.

      Or does this specifically include things like technical manuals and academic text books?

      Nephilium
      - "ALL YOU CAN HOPE FOR IS THE MERCY OF HELL." - "Yeah?" - "JUST OUR LITTLE JOKE." - "Ngk," said Crowley. -- Crowley in conversation with his superiors (Terry Pratchett & Neil Gaiman, Good Omens)

    2. Re:RTFA by cosmodrome · · Score: 0

      Actually, it would seem like the dictation in this instance is from the german government, telling people that they must pay for for popular books in order to support the less demanded specialty books. Price fixing does not circumvent the laws of supply and demand.

  21. Buchpreisbindung by apachetoolbox · · Score: 1, Funny

    Buchpreisbindung
    Bush preisbindung
    Bush pres bindung
    Bush pres dung
    Bush president dung .... oohhh i see now.

  22. So what if it only applies to new books? by gurps_npc · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You guys act like that matters?

    What they are really saying is that they want to protect the inefficient companies that have handling costs of $10, at the expense of the effecient internet sales companies with $1 handling costs.

    Because if the free market was to rule, the idiots that can't sell it for less than cover price would be forced to either go out of business, offer service WORTH the over-charging they ofer, or learn how to be more effecient.

    This ruling prevents the growth of the companies that could sell the books for $1 handling instead of $10, thereby artifically propping up the ridiculous over-priced book stores.

    I read a lot. I buy my books from Barnes and Nobles. I get paper back, not hard cover because of the huge number of books that I buy. I do not use internet services because I like the speed of going in to a book store, picking one I did not know I wanted and begin reading it right away.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:So what if it only applies to new books? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What they are really saying is that they want to protect the inefficient companies that have handling costs of $10, at the expense of the effecient internet sales companies with $1 handling costs.

      I was surprised at that line of reasoning. We have a similar law in Norway, but the stated reason here isn't to protect book stores so much as it is to maintain a supply of books on topics that we know won't be raking in a lot of money. So Harry Potter (once properly translated) gets to subsidize poems basically. This seems to work to do what it's intended to do: maintain cultural continuity in the literature and ensure that even minority topics are made available to a larger audience.
    2. Re:So what if it only applies to new books? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      Your explanation is a lie told to you by the book stores.

      Maintaining a supply of books on low profit topics is NOT dependent on book stores making profits.

      You can buy the books from internet companies, who if they are smart, set up warehouse in each country.

      If you want to acutally maintain a supply on low profit books, you have to affect PUBLSIHING costs, not SELLING costs.

      But no one is doing that. Why? Because publishing costs have dropped so much that you definitely do NOT need to protect them. Currently, for less than US $20,000 you can publish a mass market book. That cost used to be over $100,000, and that was back when $100,000 meant something.

      And that ignores the cheaper regular publishing, which can be done for under $5,000. And also it ignores the new mass market, e-books, which get published for less than $100.

      This law, like the one in Norway, does nothign to maintain a supply of books, it maintains a supply of bookSTORES.

      Personally, I find that in any city, there is never a shortage of bookstores.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    3. Re:So what if it only applies to new books? by TheMeddler · · Score: 1

      "Personally, I find that in any city, there is never a shortage of bookstores." Yes - but is there a shortage of INDEPENDENT bookstores? Probably.

      --
      90% Professional Slacker
    4. Re:So what if it only applies to new books? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      I like in a major city, so we have indepenedent bookstores. I have shoped in them.

      When I was in college, they also had independent bookstores. I shoped their.

      I love books. I read probably a book a week. Good ones, I re-read multiple times.

      I have heard a lot of people complain about the walmartization effect. They complain about it re drug stores, book stores, even coffee stores.

      They always sound like fools to me.

      First of all, I have found that GOOD independent stores stick around. It has been YEARS since Barnes And Nobles took over New York City. Many small indpenedendt book stores went under. But otheres continue to thrive. In other words, competion did it's job. The poorly run stores fell apart, the better ones survived, the onslaught of the chain stores, because the chain stores by DEFINITION can not be excellent. They are too big to be excellent. They can and often are "good", so they put the bad independent stores out of business, but they can do nothign against the Excellent stores.

      There is NOTHING that spectacular about an independent book store, or any other "independent" type of store that means they should thrive even when they offer bad service. Yes it is a pity that some people used to be able to make a living owning there own buisness now find that someone else does it better. I am sorry, but hey, I personally live with the risk of being fired by my boss if I do a poor job, and so should these buisness owners. If they do a poor job, they lose their business, just like if I do a poor job, I get fired.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    5. Re:So what if it only applies to new books? by TheMeddler · · Score: 1

      I'm very happy that you live in a big city. Not everyone does. In fact, many people don't. I do, now - but I've lived in smaller communities, too. Barnes and Noble CAN'T take over NYC. There are too many people. On the other hand, when a B&N or Borders moves into a smaller community, it will almost invariably squeeze out the independent stores - doesn't matter if the are good or bad - it is a matter of economics (economies of scale, improved pricing due to volume purchases, longer hours, etc). Then you have *one* place to buy your books.

      What if that *one* place doesn't have what you want?

      Tough shit for you, that's what.

      If all you want is mainstream stuff, I guess that's fine. If you want more eclectic or controversial fare, independents are more likely to deliver.

      That said, I don't have any issues with Borders or BN. I shop there. I also shop at local stores. But I don't have any delusions that small stores should be able to compete with megastores, either.

      --
      90% Professional Slacker
  23. Re:It's not over yet... if someone will stand up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Litigation cis ostly even in Germany and EU. The question is if eBay/others will continue litigation.

  24. Re:I thought the Nazi's left Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Deutschland rockt!

  25. And the rest of copyright as well? by tepples · · Score: 1

    If people are truly demanding the varied specialized books the government is supposedly protecting, why should they need special welfare from the government?

    One might use almost exactly the same argument against all of copyright as well, as like the price floor on new copies of a literary work, all other monopolies granted under copyright law exist to promote diversity and progress of knowledge (at least in the formulation used by some countries' constitutions). If people are truly demanding the varied specialized books that authors are creating and publishers are publishing because of the economic incentive of copyright, then why should authors and publishers need special welfare from the government in the form of copyright enforcement?