Slashdot Mirror


Las Vegas Monorail Finally Ready To Open

doormat writes "The Las Vegas monorail is finally set to open to the public on July 15th! The project has had some problems - it was originally scheduled to open in March. The first part of the monorail, which uses Bombardier M-VI train vehicles, 'a derivative of the famous Walt Disney World Mark VI trains', is 4 miles long and connects several casinos on the east side of the Las Vegas Strip (see map, QT video), as well as the Las Vegas Convention Center (Home to CES, NAB, Networld+Interop and what was Comdex). Future phases seek to expand the monorail to downtown to the North, the west side of the strip, and eventually the University and the airport (which the taxicab and limo groups fight tooth and nail). I swear it's the strip's only choice... throw up your hands and raise your voice! Monorail, Monorail, Monorail! Mono... D'oh!"

45 of 469 comments (clear)

  1. $$$ according to Zagat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wow, could it cost a little bit more? $3 a ride! $40 for 3 days? No week pass? Mono d'oh indeed.

    1. Re:$$$ according to Zagat by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 4, Informative
      Wow, could it cost a little bit more? $3 a ride! $40 for 3 days? No week pass?

      It's clearly marketed to the weekend tourists, rather than the local commuters. Tourists, many of whom fly in for the weekend, like to travel around town (no point in giving all your money to one casino when there are so many needy casino's in town). Now you've got a choice of a quick $3 monorail ride, a $8 cab fare through grid-locked streets, or hoofing it in the 100+ degree sun. It's a no-brainer.
      Once they do get it to the airport (around 2007 or so), it'll be the best thing to hit Vegas since the machine-gun shooting range.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:$$$ according to Zagat by el-spectre · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are a couple of these ranges. One is at the end of the strip (I forget which end) and is run by really safety conscious folks. I learned to fire a MP5 there.

      There's another one, its more of a gun store, and it's in N. Las Vegas. The folks there are a bit, ah... conspiracy fan-ish, but they've got some good gear.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    3. Re:$$$ according to Zagat by irving47 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Amen to the cab part, but you're forgetting about the bus! $2 per trip or $5 for a 24 hour period. And the traffic will get out of the way of the bus.

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
  2. i've always wondered... by spacerodent · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've always wondered why the US hasn't built up their mass transit abilities on the national level. We have subways in various towns but none of them link together and we don't have any of the long rail lines like they do in Germany or Japan. I also feel safe in saying the rail road is pretty shitty in compairson to other countries. I wonder if this is because as Americans we demand the right and excuse to use cars or if we have no other option right now.

    1. Re:i've always wondered... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Informative
      WTF dude. I've lived in countries with excellent public transportation, and it still sucks. It's expensive; the train goes when it wants to, not when you want to; the other passengers on the train sometimes smell really bad; and trains stop running after a certain hour; and it takes a long time to get to where you're going. It used to take me an hour to go 5 miles by train. I could make the same trip in 10 minutes by car.

      Other countries also lack the outstanding Interstate Highway System.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:i've always wondered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Where cities are close together, the mass transit systems are integrated. One can take non-Amtrak trains from Philadelphia to New Haven, Connecticut. Baltimore and Washington are connected by MARC trains, and Oakland and San Francisco are connected by Bart and S.F. and San Jose are connected by CalTrain.
      And we do have some long lines, but as you say, they are pretty shitty. But those other countries are much more densely populated and smaller. In the Northeast Amtrak, the commuter railroads and subways make a pretty good approximation of what exists in Europe.

    3. Re:i've always wondered... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's simple. The US is phyiscally to big for this sort of thing to go nation wide. Now mind you they could do a couple or so on each coast. And just maybee somthing connecting a city or two in texas through Kansas city to St. Louis to Chicago, but even that may be stretching it.
      Look at it as if each US state where a single european country, then make a comparison.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    4. Re:i've always wondered... by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 3, Informative

      The trains stop running at night and you can outrun it in a car, but you think that's excellent public transportation?

      Visit NYC sometime. Trains 24/7 that are faster and cheaper than a car or taxi.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    5. Re:i've always wondered... by tlainevool · · Score: 4, Interesting
      "The US is phyiscally to big for this sort of thing to go nation wide."


      I don't thing so. Europe is 3,837,000 Sq. Miles and the US is 3,537,438 Sq. Miles. Europe has a good continent-wide train system. Its just the love of cars that keeps trains from not working in the US.
    6. Re:i've always wondered... by Jodka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I've always wondered why the US hasn't built up their mass transit abilities on the national level."

      That's the wrong question. You should be asking why we lost the one that we had. At the beginning of the century you could travel to almost anywhere you wanted to go in the US by rail. Little villages all across countryside had passenger rail service, most with multiple stops a day.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    7. Re:i've always wondered... by k8to · · Score: 4, Informative

      This _sounds_ good on the face of it, but history says otherwise.

      In the late 1800s and early 1900s, the US had far and away the largest amount of public transit, larger than any country in europe. In the 19-teens more miles of streetcar track existed in the United States than in the entire rest of the world combined. Inter-city rail was commonly used, and relatively affordable and dependable as compared to many of the nations we currently associate with rail such as Germany or France.

      It's hard to identify true root causes, but certainly between the 1920s and the 1950s, american culture and spending patterns had fallen so heavily into the pattern of the automobile, that much of this was lost. Some might point to the american habit of so strongly valuing the new (cf. electricity, plumbing, etc.), while others might talk about our devaluing of the collectivist, thus valuing individual transportation. Still another point of consideration is the ugly side of capitalism, when private industry and infrustructure can sometimes poorly interact. Recent examples include Enron and the California power disaster, historically one can look to rail companies and their self destructive rail non-maintenance habits.

      In any event, public transit thrived despite our lack of physical density for a good 60 years, and then died. Perhaps the point could be made that it could no longer successfully compete against private transit in our relatively non-dense environment, but even the bostonwash DC corridor has very poor transit now as compared to history and yet remains rather dense.

      The problem is a good deal more complex than you suggest.

      --
      -josh
    8. Re:i've always wondered... by bwy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Probably because most people only get 2 weeks vacation and you can fly between any 2 points in the US for $200 or under if you are a smart fare shopper. Back at the turn of the century wasting time on a train was the only way to get anywhere. I'll happily take my 6 hour plane ride from FL to CA, thanks.

    9. Re:i've always wondered... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 4, Informative

      " don't thing so. Europe is 3,837,000 Sq. Miles and the US is 3,537,438 Sq. Miles."

      That statement is misleading as it includes part of Russia.

      The European Union, for example, is about 1/3 the size of the continental US, and it has about 150 million more people (1.5 times as many).

      That's approximately 4.5 times more people per square-km as the US.

      Go to Wyoming some time and tell me that a nationwide mass-transit system is feasable. It's not.

      That said, we could do much better. Amtrak is a disaster, and we need more "short-haul" solutions. I can take the bus from my city (Fort Collins, ~100km north of Denver) to Denver, but there is no rail. There should be.

      Now, the truth is that it's simply more convenient to drive. Everyone goes ~130kph on the Interstate, and there is rarely any traffic north of Denver, so it only takes about 45 minutes to get to Denver. Compare that to a rail service which would have to be much faster to even compete (to compensate for the time spent getting to the station).

  3. In other news, new trains in Minnesota by dieman · · Score: 4, Informative

    We also got our first light rail line in Minnesota, the Hiawatha Line. Also driven with Bombardier trains of an original design.

    I took some pictures of the opening here.

    96,000 people tried out the line last weekend during its debut!

    --
    -- dieman - Scott Dier
  4. CSI by mrpuffypants · · Score: 5, Funny

    Until some guys gets run over by the Monorail in CSI I'm not even going to acknowledge it.

  5. Re:Yipee!!!!! by SupaMegaBuffalo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Also, they should Open Source this POS

    Ummm... huh?

    I hope you mean only releasing the source code for those who would like to see it, and not that you want the code developed according to the usual open source models.
    Developing a system to control a vehicle carrying people is one thing that, at least i for one think, should be done by a set of well coordinated group of professionals.

  6. University by Fooby · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's a university in Las Vegas? And I thought UPenn was a party school...

  7. Re:Yipee!!!!! by faedle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Much like BART had all kinds of computer problems when it first went online. These things were not totally unanticipated. This is "new" tech, in the sense that Las Vegas Monorail will be the first mass-transit application of "driverless" rail systems anywhere in the United States (BART comes close, but somebody still pushes the "close door" button).

    Yes, it's "old" 70's (well, really, 50's, as it differs very little from the original Alweg designs that run on Seattle and Anaheim trackage) technology. However, buses are, what, 30's technology? Light rail vehicles, also, are nothing more than the modern version of the 1910's streetcars.

    In transit systems, very little changes.. because it dosen't have to. The fundamental job of getting people from one place to another across town is a simple one: it dosen't need maglev. The physics of rubber tires on a concrete "roadway" are well understood. Construction techniques required to build the Las Vegas Monorail are essentially no different than what was needed to build I-215: once you know how to pour concrete, it doesn't matter if you're building a highway for cars or a guideway for a monorail.

    Personally, I can't wait. Monorail technology is a good transit solution: clean and quiet, with the potential to be cheap and easily maintained. Hopefully, Las Vegas Monorail will prove out as good as the monorail enthusiasts (like myself) have been saying it will.

  8. Limousines and the free market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It's interesting that the taxi cab and limousine services are fighting the monorail tooth and nail.


    When I went to Florida, I had to catch a plane from Orlando airport, so I caught a bus to 'airport boulevard' - having been told it was near the airport. It was in the middle of nowhere and there was no chance of hailing a cab (even if as a poor student, I could have afforded one), so I walked for 90 minutes in the midday sun until I got to my flight - with 15 minutes to spare.


    I had been told I was on the right bus, but there didn't seem to be a bus stop in the entire airport. I was completely incredulous. Is this the reason why?


    So much for the free market and consumer choice.

    1. Re:Limousines and the free market by mandalayx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The last line of your sentence, "So much for the free market and consumer choice" has no relevance to what you said at all.

      If you had planned your route in advance, carefully, instead of just winging it, you might have taken the right bus. For example, I can drive to "University Ave" and be miles away from the actual University.

      The cabs aren't there because, as you say, you were in the "middle of nowhere". If this were a cab driver forum, you'd find no sympathy. Plus, if you happened upon a pay phone or thought ahead to bring a cell phone while traveling, you could call a taxi dispatcher. Or lacking a phone number for taxi dispatch, called local directory service (hint: 411 isn't just asking for girls' numbers) and a taxi would come.

      In fact, it seems like your case is an excellent example of consumer choice--except you made some pretty naive choices. But since you were a tourist, I suppose it's excusable. Just plan ahead when you travel next time...you're a student, so you should be good at researching these kinds of things!

  9. Anyone who has been to Vegas knows by swagr · · Score: 5, Funny

    that this monorail will take you directly from the center of a casino, to the center of many other casinos, via routes that pass through casinos.
    In order to get to any of the stations, you'll need to walk through 3 miles of casinos. In order to buy tickets, you'll need to walk through 4 miles of casinos. If you're drunk and gambling, tickets are free.

    --

    -... --- .-. . -.. ..--..
  10. Useless by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Like most public transportation projects I've been on, this one is pretty useless. You can't go from the airport to the hotel...what's the point? The system is similarly useless to anyone who actually *lives* in Vegas. Los Angeles authorities thought it would be a good idea to build some trains...they don't go anywhere that you'd ever want to go. It doesn't connect to the airport because the taxicab union lobbied against it. The Houston rail "system" is similarly pointless. Atlanta's isn't bad, mostly because union opposition was overcome and it actually connects to the airport.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  11. Well, this is a first.... by lortho · · Score: 3, Funny

    The obligatory Simpsons reference/joke made in the the actual story, before the first comment is even posted? Thought I'd never see the day... ;)

  12. Re:Yipee!!!!! by faedle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wasn't supposed to be a solution for everybody. It was, however, supposed to be a solution for the Strip and Convention Center.

    Being as the vast majority of the Las Vegas economy seems to revolve around liberating cash from tourists, looks like a good thing to me.

    Besides, that $654 million dollars came entirely from the private sector, through direct financial contributions and bonds. The taxpayers of Clark County aren't paying for it, so why the hell are you bitching?

  13. Don't like the LVMonorail? Build your own! by evacuate_the_bull · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just like Kim Pedersen. Wired did a nice story on him a few months ago and now he's started the Monorail Society.

    Cool!

    --
    Satanists get good grades too...suspiciously good grades
  14. Oblig. by G-funk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Since this was on last night, here of course is the song!

    Lyle Lanley: Well, sir, there's nothing on earth Like a genuine, Bona fide, Electrified, Six-car Monorail! ... What'd I say?

    Ned Flanders: Monorail!

    Lyle Lanley: What's it called?

    Patty+Selma: Monorail!

    Lyle Lanley: That's right! Monorail!

    [crowd chants `Monorail' softly and rhythmically]

    Miss Hoover: I hear those things are awfully loud...

    Lyle Lanley: It glides as softly as a cloud.

    Apu: Is there a chance the track could bend?

    Lyle Lanley: Not on your life, my Hindu friend.

    Barney: What about us brain-dead slobs?

    Lyle Lanley: You'll all be given cushy jobs.

    Abe: Were you sent here by the devil?

    Lyle Lanley: No, good sir, I'm on the level.

    Wiggum: The ring came off my pudding can.

    Lyle Lanley: Take my pen knife, my good man.

    I swear it's Springfield's only choice...

    Throw up your hands and raise your voice!

    All: [singing] Monorail!

    Lyle Lanley: What's it called?

    All: Monorail!

    Lyle Lanley: Once again...

    All: Monorail!

    Marge: But Main Street's still all cracked and broken...

    Bart: Sorry, Mom, the mob has spoken!

    All: [singing] Monorail! Monorail! Monorail! [big finish] Monorail!

    Homer: Mono... D'oh!

    --
    Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  15. Not that uncommon by gotr00t · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) system in the SF/Bay Area costs just about the same to use, the only difference is that its not a flat rate, but rather, a calculated fare from station to station, averaging around $3 a ride, one way. The discounts if bought in bulk are minimal (only $4 savings when $60 worth of fare is bought), and I don't think there is an "all day pass" or anything of that sort.

    I think it goes to show that when you think of this kind of rapid transit system, don't think "bus fare," which is usually cheaper. It may also be because these systems are not subsidized by local or state authorities, forcing them to charge higher fare. (though I'm not sure if this is true in either of these cases)

  16. It's meant for tourists on the Strip. by Trunks · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Have you ever tried walking from one end of the strip to the other in the middle of summer? It takes forever to get anywhere by car or taxi, and the walk is WAY too long (especially when it's hot as hell outside).

    Yeah, it doesn't get to the airport yet and has yet to cover the entire strip, but it's a start and will be a boon to many who regularly visit Vegas.

    --
    This post sponsored by Ninja Burger. "
  17. And best of all... by character_assassin · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... it terminates at the Las Vegas Hilton, better known to Slashdotters as the home of the Star Trek Experience. Don't forget to visit Quark's Bar, where you can order - shudder - "The Wrap Of Khan."

    --

    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    1. Re:And best of all... by identity0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh shit, now you have me picturing some fat Slashdotter sitting on the john in his hotel at 2am....

      "Kaaaaaaaaaaahhn!!!"

  18. Re:What happens in Brockway, stays in Brockway by JamesKPolk · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or hope Leonard Nimoy is in town doing a show.

  19. Re:Yipee!!!!! by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This is "new" tech, in the sense that Las Vegas Monorail will be the first mass-transit application of "driverless" rail systems anywhere in the United States (BART comes close, but somebody still pushes the "close door" button).

    Not exactly a rail system, but the PRT that services WVU in Morgantown, WV., has been running for about 30 years now. Driverless, electrically driven cars with rubber tires on a concrete track, powered from a 3rd rail. The tracks are steam-heated in winter. It was a pork-barrel Rockefeller project from day one, and most likely sucks up great piles of federal funds to this day. Being prone to breakdowns, the University still had to keep buses & drivers on constant standby to shuttle students between the two spread-out campuses.

    I remember news stories when I was attending college there in the late 70's about how stray dogs would occasionaly manage to get onto the track. The PRT cars, being computer controlled, would soon overtake and squish the pooches without even slowing down, while the passengers watched the whole thing, unable to do anything about it.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  20. A Monorail in Las Vegas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I dunno, seems like more of Shelbyville idea to me.

  21. Re:Yipee!!!!! by ffsnjb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But as bondholders, as long as the project is successful (and the risk on this is low), NV will get the investment back, plus interest, saving taxpayers money in the long run (ignoring inflation and larger budgets).

    Governments SHOULD do this type of investing. If they did it correctly, we wouldn't have to pay taxes anymore. My dream is to build the federal treasury to a point where it operates off an annuity with no more income from the people. Granted, this will take a lot of upfront investment by the people, but it's a damn good thing.

    Now to get elected...

    --
    "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion
  22. Re:Why? by Peter+McC · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is not unique to monorails. For instance, the Montreal subway system uses rubber tires on concrete paths, but it's otherwise identical to a standard subway system (they still have the standard track and wheels on the cars as a backup in case of flat tires). The ride is certainly quieter than metal-on-metal, especially around the corners, but it can be fairly bouncy.

    --
    You know what I hate? Wait, what do you like? I hate that!
  23. I dont like the LV monorail by nekdut · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am a frequent visitor of Vegas and I doubt I will EVER use the new monorail. First of all, the construction of this monorail closed a number of FREE trams/rails that I often used. There was an excellent free rail between the MGM and Ballys, as well as the Monte Carlo -> Bellagio tram. Both closed down for this construction. Now going from MGM to Ballys will cost $$ and the Monte Carlo Bellagio tram still remains closed! It's on the other side of the street for god sakes. There was no reason to close this excellent free service.

    Second, the cost. I usually go with a group of friends, and if the 5 of us split a cab, it always cost $10 or less total, AND takes us door to door instead of only a few stations WAY at the back of the casinos. This is also 24 hrs a day. The monorail closes at midnight!! Who the hell heads back to their room at midnight in vegas?!

    The only advantage the monorail has is a direct route to the convention center. Large conventions could make good use of this, but otherwise, I'd suggest tourists stay away.

  24. Have any of you been to vegas? by dabug911 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The main purpose of this monorail is to create easier travel between the LVCA (convention center) and the strip. The conventnion center is a good distance away from the strip if you walk, this will make staying on the strip and traveling to the LVCA much easier. Plus most travelers will be business and be paying with business account more then likely. Others will be people who just need a quick way to get around. I'm sure day passes will eventually be released for this system. But its not always easy to get around between areas in vegas, even if it doesn't seem that far. While this is useless for locals its perfect for travelers who want to see different areas of vegas. Once this reachs out to Downtown this will provide much more bsuiness for that area that is hard to reach right now and that most people dont' want to pay the extra money to go and visit. sinc down town is a few miles away from the strip and is renovating also to become popular again this is a great thing for the las vegas economy.

    But for the most part vegas gets most of its income now adays from CONVENTION TRAVELERS. Which means that making it easier to get back and fourth to the convention center is always a plus. The stations they have built for this system are really nice and will also help the business traveller

    --
    I can't believe its not butter!
  25. Re:Bart Driverless ? by k8to · · Score: 4, Informative

    The BART system was designed and intended as a driverless system. This turned out to be a bit of an overconfidence issue since the automatic systems had several kinks, the most significant of which being the train-near sensors.

    The basic problem was that BART trains were designed so as to be able to detect the presence of another train relatively near ahead on the tracks. I'm not sure what the method used was, whether it was designed to simply detect objects (radar or something similar) or whether trains produced signals that the other trains picked up. Certainly detecting large objects seems insufficient for trains designed to travel at large speeds which must also operate inside tunnels etc. In any event, during hot weather outside, the sensors would have false-positive problems, detecting trains that did not exist, and would refuse to continue. To limp past this problem, drivers were necessary to take over the role of choosing when it was no longer safe to advance. By default the trains still operated autonomously in most other ways.

    Casual observation indicates a number of issues with the trains are apparently mildly driver-operated. Trains which are less than full length seem to have their stop position adjusted by the 'driver' (sometimes very ineptly). The 'driver' sometimes adjusts stop times, which is quite useful for rush hour or event-related crowds, although I sometimes wish it was pre-set so people would board more efficiently. Also it seems the 'driver' has some possibility to affect train speed, as there have definitely been cases where a change of driver just north of Union City resulted in a much changed rate of progress for the duration of the trip, although I suspect this input is optional, and infrequently used.

    Certainly the BART train console is relatively elaborate, but after the manner of a point-of-sale terminal, with several print-insert buttons and no visible analog inputs of any sort. When I have watched bart train 'drivers', I have certainly seen entire station-to-station journeys made with no input at all.

    --
    -josh
  26. It's A Difference In Population Mass by BigDork1001 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I've always wondered why the US hasn't built up their mass transit abilities on the national level.

    I'm an American currently stationed in Germany and I used to wonder the same thing myself before I got over here. Here's why it won't work the same.

    Over here in Europe the populations are clumped together a lot more than in the states. In Germany all the villages are pretty tightly packed. You don't have big yards, many people live in small houses that are right up against the next house or at most has a small alleyway seperating the houses. You have these little villages and then you'll have a kilometer or three of farm land or woods and then the next village. In the states everyone has a big back yard, a house, and we aren't living right on top of each other. Our suburbs and definatly our rural areas are more spread out.

    It's not feasible for every village in the US to have a train station or bus stop because with everyone so spread out it might be a couple mile walk to the nearest public transportation pick up. Where I grew up, Maine, NY, I was a few miles away from the center of the town and at least 6 or 7 miles away from the nearest bus stop. Where in Germany they are never more than a half mile or so from the nearest bus stop, or so it seems to me.

    And so that's my opinion of why the US cannot have a mass transit system like they have here in Europe.

    --
    "Armed forces abroad are of little value unless there is prudent counsel at home" - Cicero
  27. It's because of high parking costs by Secrity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Another problem is that to get to mass transit stations, most people have to travel some number of miles from their home. Most inter-city train stations are in the center of a city and parking is impossible or VERY expensive. In some cities this is not a problem for local trains because the systems' designers provided for ample suburban station parking and the local administrators see free parking as an incentive for people to use mass transit. In other cities, such as with the Washington, DC METRO system, the inadequately sized METRO parking lots fill up early in the day and the administrators charge for parking to subsidise rail operations. For more information about Washington DC METRO fair and parking increases and anticipated reduction in usage, see today's article at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A193 08-2004Jun30.html

  28. Re:a correction to one of your statements by eriko · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yep. You've heard that Alaska is going to split into two states? That'll make Texas the *third* largest state.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une sig.
  29. Re:Yipee!!!!! by Dashing+Leech · · Score: 3, Funny
    Yes, it's "old" 70's (well, really, 50's, as it differs very little from the original Alweg designs that run on Seattle and Anaheim trackage) technology. However, buses are, what, 30's technology? Light rail vehicles, also, are nothing more than the modern version of the 1910's streetcars.

    Oh, everything's stolen nowadays. Why, the fax machine is nothing but a waffle iron with a phone attached.

    (I can't believe I managed to use a relevent Simpson's quote in a story on monorails without refering to the monorail episode.)

  30. Re:Why? by roothog · · Score: 3, Informative

    Monorail beamway has a significantly smaller footprint and blocks less sky than traditional elevated two-rail guideway. See pages 14/15 and 38/39 of this PDF for some pictures. Sorry, a quick google search did not return any web pages with pics.

    If you compare it with at-grade two-rail, then the advantage is that an elevated monorail has no road crossings. Of course, this is true of any elevated transit system.

    Note that the small beam makes monorail evacuations more difficult than elevated light-rail evacuation. For light rail, people can just walk to one end of the train and step out onto the guideway. The Las Vegas monorail system installed emergency walkways between the beams. Riders step out of the side train doors onto the walkway. Disney World does not have emergency walkways and evacuates to the roof of the train. You then walk across the top of the train to one end and shimmy down the windscreen to the beam, and then walk the beam. (The beam is 26 or 28 inches wide). No WDW monorail has ever been evacuated, although there was a train fire years ago in an old Mark IV train.

  31. Re:What happens in Brockway, stays in Brockway by Short+Circuit · · Score: 3, Funny

    If it's maglev, then they probably have a super conductor!

    Otherwise, depending on their power needs, 6-gauge wire should work. :)