Slashdot Mirror


EC Approves Unconditionally Sony-BMG Merger

Paul Slocum writes "Just when you thought the music industry couldn't get any worse, Sony and BMG are merging. Now there will only be 4 major labels, and they estimate that 2000 jobs (25% of combined workforce) will be cut." An anonymous reader points to Reuters' report on the planned merger, which points out that "Vivendi-owned Universal and Sony BMG, as the new company is to be called, account for about 46 percent of music sold worldwide."

39 of 247 comments (clear)

  1. Sony, Bony. by mfh · · Score: 3, Funny

    There's an obscure reference to something like this in an old eighties movie called Crazy People, where the genius crazy people decide to thwart Sony executives by making an ad that simply says: Sony, Bony (while the guy shows this a sketch of a really skinny old guy). I'm sorry but when else am I going to get to reference this funny/stupid movie quote, but when a company starting with the letter B is going to join forces with Sony.

    So say it with me;
    BMG + Sony...
    Sony, Bony

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  2. music hegemony by Kris+Thalamus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This looks like a good time to support open source music.

    1. Re:music hegemony by -kertrats- · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Open source music? As in, you can see the source code of the song you're listening to? Isnt that called 'sheet music'? If it is, Ibelieve just about all music is available open source.

      --
      The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
  3. So what? by ElForesto · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So what if they merge? I've noticed a lot of smaller labels starting to come into the market, and one of my favorite bands, Vast, switched to one of them. Let the big guys get bigger. This market is going to be dominated by little guys once again.

    Anyone remember their history? As I recall, it was a revolt against ASCAP that lead to the formation of RCA. Or do I have my names wrong?

    --
    There is a difference between "insightful" and "inciteful" other than spelling.
    1. Re:So what? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 4, Informative
      It's BMI:
      ASCAP and BMI
      In 1914 the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP) was established to protect recording artists from unsanctioned use of their material. ASCAP used a blanket licensing agreement to collect a pre-set annual fee from anyone using its members' material for any commercial purpose. The money was divided among ASCAP artists. As major players in the radio industry became more interested in broadcasting recorded work, ASCAP reinforced its control over distribution. Artists who were not ASCAP members had little hope of exposing their work to wide audiences.

      During the recording boom of the late 30s and early 40s, ASCAP had doubled the fees they charged radio stations. In the midst of court battles and the dearth of music not protected by ASCAP, frustrated broadcasters formed their own blanket licensing system, Broadcast Music, Incorporated (BMI), in 1939. The BMI camp sought alternatives to ASCAP acts. In the process BMI would later become the dominant force in the discovery and marketing of a new sound that would breed a new culture.
      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  4. 46% of music sold? by SirSlud · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That is a scary statistic. Even more so if you're a musician.

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  5. Good News for SACD Fans? by mr.henry · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If there are any.. this could mean more of BMG's catalog will come out on Sony's SACD format.

    1. Re:Good News for SACD Fans? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2, Informative
      Seriously?
      Well, not quite. However, when I last bought stuff from those companies (mid-90s), the shipping was $6 for one, IIRC. (When getting multiple ones at a time, the extras might have been as "little" as $3 apiece.) Things might be a little more sane now.

      It turned out that the "12 for 1" deal got you CDs for something like eight or nine dollars apiece. If you wanted twelve albums, then it was a decent deal; that's how I filled out my record collection as a teenager. However, it's obvious that they make a pretty decent profit by overcharging for shipping; it's not the great deal that they lead you to believe.

      Of course, the strange part was that they charged so much that only a fool would buy the CDs at regular price. You'd think that the amount of customer turnover that must have caused would eventually hurt the company. (But maybe I just don't think like a marketer.)

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  6. 2000 fewer workers = ? by meganthom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With 2000 fewer workers to pay, we consumers can expect to pay, what, $1-2 more per CD to account for all the money they saved?

    Favorite quote: "[Jean-Luka Monte]called the merger "very bad news not only for independents, but also for retailers and artists."

    You mean the recording industry isn't trying to protect and help artists?! Say it ain't so! ;-)

    --
    Live free or die
  7. Re:Ahhh... by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just picturing from "Demolition Man" where all restaraunts are "Taco Bell".

  8. When asked... by Gentoo+Fan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sony artists include Aerosmith, George Michael and Barbra Streisand, while the BMG stable has Avril Lavigne and Elvis Presley.

    Elvis unavailable for comment regarding the merger.

  9. There May Only Be One by Psymunn · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just one step closer to CocaWarner McMicroSonySoft

    --
    The Neo-Bohemian Techno-Socialist
  10. Artists need to fight back by AnotherDreamer · · Score: 4, Informative

    I recently released an album under a Creative Commons license simply because I would never want a situation in which my audience would be persecuted for listening to my music. The RIAA is must be taking out of the loop. Fans and artists must make an effort to do so. Anyway, my album is available for free at www.anotherdreamer.net

    --
    Open Source Music: anotherdreamer.net
  11. I don't know if it really makes much difference by nebaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There were what 4 and now 3 big companies? Still not a monopoly, and didn't they already get convicted of price fixing with just the 4 of them? What we have here is an oligopoly, before and after. I realize that this will be one big player, but can you think of any abuses that could be perpetuated now that couldn't have been (and weren't) done before? I think Anti Trust issues only come in when a true monopoly occurs.

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
  12. I'm sorry... by Transcendent · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...but just hearing "music" and "industry" in the same sentence kinda makes me think that I'm fed a mass-produced, scientifically designed, corporate controlled brain anesthetic instead of actual music.

    Now that the "industry" is controlled by fewer companies, closer to one conglomeration, the appreciation for what comes out of it is even smaller.

    I guess that's why I stopped buying CDs a long time ago and just listen to online radio of "underground" (progressive trance if you must know my tastes) and classical music.

    1. Re:I'm sorry... by Transcendent · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Transcendent" has nothing to do with trance.... at all.

      1) The spellings are different - trance vs transcendent...

      2) Trance is music, transcendent is:

      1. Surpassing others; preeminent or supreme.
      2. Lying beyond the ordinary range of perception: "fails to achieve a transcendent significance in suffering and squalor" (National Review).
      3. Philosophy.
      1. Transcending the Aristotelian categories.
      2. In Kant's theory of knowledge, being beyond the limits of experience and hence unknowable.
      4. Being above and independent of the material universe. Used of the Deity.

      not a damn thing to do with one another... not a damn thing...

      (just some education for the confused)

  13. Re:great by black+mariah · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about you put forth some effort and actually LOOK for bands instead of sitting on your ass expecting them to be shoved in your face? You obviously have an internet connection, I suggest you use it.

    --
    'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
  14. Sony BMG? Bullshit Machine Gun? by JPelorat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Load up the Sony BMGs! The DMZ (Downloaded Music Zone) is hot!

    --
    Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
  15. Question by cubicledrone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    they estimate that 2000 jobs (25% of combined workforce) will be cut

    Am I correct in assuming that the only thing businesses will gladly spend substantial amounts of money on (other than catered, air-conditioned lunches) is firing people?

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    1. Re:Question by cubicledrone · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Look, Cubicledrone, you got fired from a shitty company

      Several shitty companies.

      The longer you carry around your anger towards all companies (yes, I have read your previous posts), the longer you will be miserable.

      I'm not miserable, nor am I angry. I'm simply pointing out that the "job market" (such as it is, which is to say, it ain't) is hopelessly stacked against the (former) employee.

      There was a commercial for some technology company on a while ago. I find the little scripted skits in commercials to be a nearly perfect mirror of our fucked-up society, by the way. Anyway, this commercial was imitating Survivor.

      Everyone is sitting on a wooden platform in the middle of a lake and someone says "I think we should vote Smith off the team," and Smith replies (to the entire group) "why me?" and a disembodied voice snaps back "why not!?" in an emphatically venomous tone.

      At that moment, one of the people announces some major problem at work to which Smith replies "oh, I solved that problem." Everyone nods their heads in agreement and appreciation for Smith's accomplishment.

      He is then thrown off the dock into the water.

      Now at first this might seem funny, but it is really a rather hostile example of maliciousness among co-workers who we are told to believe should be "team players."

      But the most important part of the little skit, which symbolizes everything that is wrong with the professional environment right now is that disembodied voice that snaps "why not!?" when it is suggested that some unfortunate employee be discarded like so much garbage. It's actually a fair question.

      In an environment where people are of no value (which is probably the most concise description of the job market possible), there really is no adequate answer to the question "why shouldn't Smith be fired?"

      And that is why having a job is largely meaningless. Since there is no adequate answer to the question "why shouldn't Smith be fired?" employees no longer enjoy the benefit of the doubt, and therefore have absolutely no reason to believe their job amounts to anything more than today's wage.

      But remember, people do not like arrogance.

      Unless it's the arrogance of management as they fire people by the thousands upon thousands upon thousands. Then they love it.

      You can swear up and down that you are right and they are wrong, but it doesn't get you anywhere.

      Nothing "gets you anywhere" in this job market. There are basically two choices:

      1) Sink into the grayness, stagnate and have a joyless, desolate career totally devoid of even the most modest accomplishment.

      2) Try to work hard and achieve something, and get fired (repeatedly) for not being a team player.

      The reason I continue to point this out is because it would be nice if there were a third choice.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
  16. Oh, dear.... by mblase · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now there will only be 4 major labels

    That's like complaining that there's only four different types of manure. Any way you buy it, it's still crap.

  17. Real Effect? by Dibson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Obviously, this is not a 'good' thing for music listeners, but I feel the music industry has found it's niche at this point: take acts and push them like hell. Make them popular. At this point there's no reason to stop this (unless they actually decide they want to put out something for it's artistic merit rather than financial potential).

    With rare exceptions, I haven't been buying music released on the 5 or 4 major labels. I feel like this won't even really matter except to those who may lose jobs because of the merge. If you're buying music put out by the majors, you can keep doing that. If you're not, you're gonig to stick to your indie labels and local musicians and it doesn't matter anyway.

    Obviously giant corporate beings are no good (I would love to see clear channel go) but until they ruin independents, can anyone see any changes this might make?

    --
    -- Why keep us waiting? We are not made of time.
  18. Piracy by codepuke · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "Just when you thought the music industry couldn't get any worse, Sony and BMG are merging. Now there will only be 4 major labels, and they estimate that 2000 jobs (25% of combined workforce) will be cut."

    I sure do love how Slashdot always wants it both ways. To all the people that download mp3s this is your fault. Now it will be harder for new artists to get signed and the variety of music will suffer. I hope you all like mainstreet crap that ClearChannel plays. Thanks!

    1. Re:Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      To all the people that download mp3s this is your fault.

      Proof, please?

      Anyone who's actually done a study has found that there is a correlation between file sharing and increased music sales. (Which only makes sense - record labels have known for years that nobody will buy music without hearing it first... which is why they pay people to distribute it for free.)

  19. Awesome by realmolo · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know, these mergers are actually a good thing. If all the media companies keep merging, eventually they'll be one big monolithic company that everyone can actively hate, like Microsoft.

    It's hard to fight a battle on many fronts, but if there's ONE company to hate, it's easy to rile up the masses.

  20. Consolidation... modded as Flamebait?? by Black-Man · · Score: 2, Funny

    Of course it's consolidation of the industry. A STRUGGLING industry. And obviously things are probably going to get worse for them rather than better.

    I think there's enough blame to go around... INCLUDING the artists! They suck... the record company promotes crap... P2P has sucked what little margin was left... and now the live concerts are going down the tube.

    Music Industry... Airline Industry... what's the difference? Could a government bailout be next? LOL!

  21. Stick it to the man by Knights+who+say+'INT · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean, sheesh, with the internet, this is much less of a problem. Just stop listening to major label music and support independent artists.

  22. Look on the bright side! by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2, Funny

    If all the huge music makers merge, the RIAA will become redundant. One hardly needs a Recording Industry Association of America if there's only one company to represent. They can do it themselves.

    Let's hope the 25% staff cut are RIAA morons.

    So, to sum up: I, for one, welcome our new trash pop overlords.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  23. More slashdot consistency. by mumblestheclown · · Score: 4, Insightful
    First slashdot cries that RIAA members are fat middlemen then do nothing for the artists. Won't somebody please think of the artists!

    But when 2000 job cuts are imminent, suddenly those workers are just hardworkin' folk.

    Look, idiot submitters: consolidation and merger between relative equals happens in SHRINKING industries (makes hand gestures like Ben Affleck trying to explain basic economics to Jay and Silent bob from that "strike back movie"), not expanding ones. so maybe, just maybe you tinfoil hat crowd can see this as a *good* thing for your nevertheless ill-thought out anti-riaa crusade.

    note: i challenge anybody to suggest how apple selling music is fundamentally different than wal-mart doing it in the sense that neither wal-mart nor apple can really promote artists other than one can give britney an endcap and the other can give her some banner ad or other prominent website mention. at the end of the tune, itunes, the coca-cola music store, and every other digital music place that is popping up whack-a-mole fashion are just RETAILERS. there is a massive difference between this and actual promoters and distributors and the difference will continue to grow as there are more and more digital retail outlets out there and so the incentive for an individual retailer to be anything but a bottom feeder pricewise shrinks more and more.

  24. Re:There Can Only Be One by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 4, Funny

    Today IBMSNBCBS, owners of Fox/ABCNN, merged with CokeWarner McMicroSonyDisneySoft, completing the last possible corporate merger that had remained on planet Earth.

    --
    The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
  25. Re:great by blinder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "As of March 2001, there were 10,983 commercial radio stations in the United States"

    according to the FCC

    Clear Channel currently owns 1,182 radio stations. Not exactly "everything" now is it?

    Oh yeah... you might want to consider looking other places for music. Believe it or not there is a HUGE independent music market that caters to just about every taste imaginable.

  26. some more good/free music... by wibs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm not affiliated with it, but I've found 3hive to be a great site. Every single day they post download links for a few tracks being offered for free by artists under small labels. The site seems to mainly do emo rock and punk, which frankly is either good or really bad, but it also covers other things ranging from electronica to hip hop to folk. It's just a damn good site and hopefully someone will find this link to it and enjoy it.

    --
    If you get nervous, just remember that there are a few billion other people who don't really give a damn.
  27. I for one by vaderhelmet · · Score: 2, Funny

    welcome our new music overlords!!!

    If you need me, I'll be listening to Aerosmith's new remix of "Blue Suede Shoes" ....

    --- Please insert flaming below ---

  28. Re:Ahhh... by shawnce · · Score: 3, Informative

    It was Taco Bell in the original US release. In a few non-US releases I guess they changed it to Pizza Hut.

  29. Yeah, right by rodik · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The joint venture will create a recorded music business better able to serve artists and consumers in this rapidly changing marketplace," Bertelsmann chairman and CEO Gunter Thielen said in a statement late Monday.

    Real-world translation:
    We blow our noses at you, so-called consumers. We fart in your general direction!
    Now obey us, or we shall taunt you a second time!

  30. Re:I have no problem with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    >Its the same thing that happened to Microsoft... Microsoft's over-reaching control basically caused the Linux movement.
    >So hopefully, our culture will no longer be held hostage to these corporate giants.

    I hope not. Hell, I don't want to download music sheets and lyrics and have to play/sing the music myself!

    Stupid open-source movement.... grumble grumble

  31. Sure, it makes a difference by muel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The reason the music market has dwindled so much in the past eight years is because, up until yesterday, only five big corporations (not four) had a bottom line to work with.

    Turning two companies into one means turning two bottom lines into one. Or, better put...

    "Why should we, SONY/BMG, release the same amount of material that competes against itself? We don't need to release that Avril Lavigne clone we'd been developing, since we actually have Avril Lavigne, and that means we can focus our teen advertising on one artist/album rather than two. Cut the Avril clone and we'll wind up with more profit. Same with our gangsta rappers, our garage rock bands, our adult contemporary singers, our country artists, etc etc etc. Cut 'em down and we'll spend less money on more, better-focused profit."

    This might get rid of a few cookie-cutter artists, but ultimately, it retracts the feelers of the new, shrunken two-companies-into-one, which means even less resources are poured into artist discovery, catalog development and risk-taking. Reprise Records was founded with Sinatra's vision that there was both integrity and profit to be had in developing an artist over many years, and then once that artist finally breaks big, watching cash pour in with later sales of the back catalog. Major labels have killed this strategy and have put current sales and quarterly figures at the head of conversation instead. Another merger simply speeds this decay of major label integrity by having even fewer hands working to pluck out hits rather than develop catalog & LP artists.

    When you cut 20% of the diversity out of a market that already lacks diversity, you're pouring more black oil into the ocean. Remember, just because an ocean is polluted doesn't excuse the further pollution. Five big evil labels are now four bigger, more evil labels, and the non-SONY/BMG labels will scramble to do whatever they can to catch up to this news, which means plenty of bands will be punted out of their contracts and dropped on their asses before said bands ever had a chance to tour and recoup their previous marketing expenditures. Another sad day in major label history.

  32. Good! by Platypii · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At this point I no longer understand why there are complaints on slashdot about events such as this. It is clear that the faults of the recording industry are not going to be fixed slowly over time. It is too late to merely stop them, now that they have gained too much momentum.

    The recording industry has been headed in one direction for a long time now, and it only leads to requiring increasingly ridiculous measures (legal, drm, etc) to maintain their position.

    The more likely outcome, in my opinion, is then that the music industry will continue consolidating, and attempting to defend a failing business model, and eventually collapse. Treating their customers as criminals is not going to tolerated forever.

    Personally, I think this merger is great, in that it is just pushing the recording industry one step closer to their eventual doom.

  33. Re:Bad analogy by StillAnonymous · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "the bottom will fall out of the diamond market"

    I SERIOUSLY hope so. That market is one of the biggest scams going and it bothers me to no end that millions of people have been so unknowingly manipulated by those bastards.

    Basically training women to want diamonds and to convince men that they are worthless unless they can produce the biggest rock to show the woman how much they love them. Uh huh.. Let's breed a few generations of shallow, materialistic, gold diggers. What good is a diamond anyways? Unless you're using it for drilling, cutting, or building a satellite death-laser, it's the equivilent of a piece of glass.

    Ugh.. Offtopic, but I had to rant on that issue. DeBeers and Monsanto are at the top of my corporate shit-list.