Slashdot Mirror


Linux Smartphones Race To Be 1st In U.S.

An anonymous reader writes "The race is on for first mover in the domestic US Linux smartphone market! Last week, Motorola announced a new Linux-based business user smartphone that's expected to ship to US customers by the end of 2004. Meanwhile, Chinese phone maker e28 will debut its latest Linux-based smartphone at LinuxWorld this week, and will soon begin distributing it in the Chicago area. Both devices are pretty cool. The quad-band Moto phone features a 1.3 megapixel camera, Intel's latest cell-phone chip, and fancy sync software that (currently only) works with Microsoft email servers at this point (others pending). e28's phone is an upgrade to its previously announced e2800, which became the world's first commercially available Linux phone when it shipped in China in August, 2003 [Slashdot discussion]. Interestingly, e28 was founded in 2002 by the former president of Mot's Asia Pacific cell phone division -- the world's largest mobile market."

21 of 92 comments (clear)

  1. great news by randomized · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Competition is great, I would love to get a smart phone that runs linux based kernel and allows for development without strings attached. Currently, Symbian phones are difficult to debug for. Microsoft phones... I won't even go into that.

    Some phone manufacturers are attempting to lock users from installing their own custom software, some are trying to prevent people writing for the phones without paying royalties (signed apps).

    Power to the user, if I can tweak with my phone as much as I can do with my pc - it's all good news.

    I just hope it won't take minutes to boot like my Fedora Core 2 at the moment ;)

    --
    -- shortcut - the longest distance between two points.
    1. Re:great news by mikewas · · Score: 2, Insightful
      No way!

      I want a seperate phone, PDA, camera, ...

      I want them all with no interface other than bluetooth or WiFi.

      I want a seperate interface device, one display, keyboard/text entry, ...

      Everything connectted together via bluetooth.

      I have a phone now with a grungy camera & PDA function. Most of the phone, PDA, other items I have are the keyboard & display. I'd much rather have a single very capable human interface and then a phone, PDA, other items that are very small and can be just slipped into a pocket or backpack.

      It'd be really great if they'd share a power supply too, a small battery pack or fuel cell. then there's just one cahrger (wall wart or compressed gas) to lug about. I'm now taking multiple chargers, interface cables/wireless cards with me when I go on a trip.

      If I want new phone features I just buy the phone functionality, not everything else. A better camera, I get just that.

      --

      "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." --Napoleon Bonaparte
    2. Re:great news by pardey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree completely - modular replacement of gadgets is the way to go, both price-wise and feature wise, which is exactly why it will never happen. Phone/PDA companies would make less money with such a plan, so they have no incentive to develop a completely new device system. Thus, I'm left with my lame cameraphone and duplicated PIM functions in my phone and PDA.

    3. Re:great news by tcr · · Score: 2, Informative

      VOIP capabilities

      Given the crazy price per MB for GPRS data (at least here in the UK), I think it would be cheaper to...err....just make a call with the thing. :-)

      --


      Information wants to be beer.
  2. Motorola is on a roll ... by Numair · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Check out their new RAZR V3 as well ...

  3. bah by gotpaint32 · · Score: 4, Funny

    A linux based phone that only works with M$ mail... What is the world coming to!

    --
    Nuclear war would really set back cable. - Ted Turner
    1. Re:bah by ThogScully · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The article said it only Sync'd with Microsoft email, but the Motorola does POP3 and IMAP4 email communication too. The fact that it syncs with MS proprietary stuff is in addition to supporting the standards.
      -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
  4. linux != full access by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    something you should remember, just because it's linux based underneath doesn't mean it'll give the customer(you) any access to the system underneath or means to customize it beyond installing j2me apps. in most(all) cases these 'linux based' phones are not supposed to show what they are to the customer at all anyways(linux just happens to be a good fit for the os underneath, the customer isn't supposed to ever see it though and the customer apps supposed to be all java which makes software & sdk support a whole lot easier for them).

    symbian phones give surprisingly(scary) good access to the hardware underneath.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:linux != full access by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Informative

      it does not, that was the whole point of mine(that you don't get any geeky fun with it like you would with a zaurus for example).

      these things would not expose the linux side to the outer world by any way, it would be more like a web kiosk in your pocket or whatever(and j2me is very sandboxed).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  5. I'll buy it if.... by ron_ivi · · Score: 2, Informative
    ... if I'm able to run my own apps on it easily.

    Things I want in my phone:

    rsync my text-file-phone-book with my desktop.

    cron / at as a reminder service.

    scp my voicemails and photos and text messages to&from my desktop.

    If I can do all that, I'm getting one. Otherwise, I agree, what's the point.

    1. Re:I'll buy it if.... by brunes69 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nearly any phone with Java capability and a PC sync cable allows you to write your own apps and upload them.

  6. Re:I won't buy it by ThogScully · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't need or want a camera in my phone either, but for 95% of the population, it doesn't hurt. And it certainly isn't expensive.

    You don't have to see the "use" of Linux on a phone. In the case of the Motorola, that only means that their Java software base runs in Linux. I'd expect more stability than an equivalent Windows-based smartphone and better interoperability with my desktops. Since it's apparently just a USB Mass Storage Device to the computer, sounds like that was granted.

    The email syncing is only with Microsoft Exchange, but both products can do POP3 and the Moto can even do IMAP4 - that's pretty darn flexible.

    As for those other features you don't know about, the article often includes more information than the summary. The Motorola is a quad-band phone, the E28 mentioned some ungodly amount of battery life, and both I think had Bluetooth.

    And lastly, I'm sure even someone as annoyed as you at new things can figure out how to use them as phones. It's not like the interface is BASH on these - they look just like phones and people who don't know it's Linux will have no trouble using them as such.
    -N

    --
    I've nothing to say here...
  7. Smart phones or stupid companies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why does every phone maker nowadays insist on cramming as much as possible in cellphones? Can't they just leave a phone a phone? Maybe they should sell them as a pda/camera/gameboy/mp3 player that also happen to maker phone calls. It seems that the more junk they put in them, the easier they will crash. And it makes navigating the UI a chore.

    I really wish Apple would take a shot at designing a phone UI, they still have some of the best UI designers anywhere. With the iPod they found a way to navigate thousands of songs that really works.

    1. Re:Smart phones or stupid companies? by dyefade · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And it makes navigating the UI a chore.

      Why do people always make that arguement? Having more features MIGHT make the UI ugly or difficult, but it doesn't have to. I have a Sagem MyX-7, the UI is fine.
      I agree that sometimes manufacturers make crap UI's, but not all do, and that's not a reason to reduce the number of features.
      To clarify my point slightly... it's ok to have more features, so long as the UI doesn't suffer, which it doesn't always.

    2. Re:Smart phones or stupid companies? by ultrabot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why does every phone maker nowadays insist on cramming as much as possible in cellphones? Can't they just leave a phone a phone?

      Well, they do. Just buy a model that is not a smartphone. They are dirt cheap these days.

      The margin, however, will be in the phones with most features (and higher prices). Only a few ultra-chic models of "dumb" phones have sufficient margins.

      --
      Save your wrists today - switch to Dvorak
  8. Re:I won't buy it by vincob · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I don't see a use of Linux on a phone
    Phone manufacturer aren't interested in Linux to give a fun toy to geeks, but for the same reason Linux is seeing success in the embedded world: High-quality networking stack, good performance, access to source code, no royalty, customizable, and many applications available compared to other embedded OS. Vincent
  9. I love my phone camera. by mark99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I love the lousy camera in my phone. I do a lot of business travel (in europe) and it is nice to have a camera to take shots of various landmarks. I never have my good camera "handy".

    However the point about some firms not liking cameras it valid. I wish the camera could be physically extracted so I could leave it at the desk sometimes, instead of the entire unit.

  10. MeshPhone? by Baldrson · · Score: 2, Interesting
    From the article:
    The A780 includes about 48MB of built-in user storage space...
    The LocustWorld MeshBox requires only 32MB.

    Things really take off when you put mesh routing into VoIP phones and they start jabbering at each other.

  11. Re:I won't buy it by mwood · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Second the notion. Let me know when I can buy a Linux-based stupidphone that just dials, picks up, and lets me talk with people out of earshot. A basic personal phone book is a plus. My years-old Motorola ST7868W already has far too many features I don't use and don't want to use.

    OTOH "long standby time" is good. They're trying to say that it will run for a long long time between chargings when you don't actually talk (assuming that talking is still provided). An active connection drains the battery at a higher rate and doesn't count as "standby"; only time spent switched on but not connected is "standby". You want standby time to be somewhat longer than you usually go, or would want to go, between chargings. And "triband" is good too -- it means that the phone's radio section can communicate with all mobile phone gear, at least until they discover that most Americans now have triband so it's time to invent another band to keep the riffraff out.

  12. Re:I won't buy it by mwood · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know what would be *really* smart? Letting me tell my phone to take big wads of unwanted features *off* the menus until I decide that I want one of them back. Let them all hide behind one "manage features" menu pick.

  13. More wishes by leuk_he · · Score: 2, Funny

    * megapixel camera
    Set you standard higher, 2 Megapixel with optical zoom & nightvision! also having the possibilty to recod movies.
    * MP3 player (4-20gb please)
    And usb, so i can use at as a plug & play hard disk for any pc. Must also play mp4 movies?
    * Gaming platform (c++ or symbian)
    & java !
    * IR remote (saves having a table full of them)
    & IR interface to laptop in case it does not have BT, or wifi.
    -small form factor. (PDA?)
    -must have moneydetector (to detect false money), that is a UV + IR lamp.

    -ringtones... it is a phone?!