Slashdot Mirror


Is Typing a Necessary Skill?

cloudwilliam asks: "The Christian Science Monitor has an interesting article on how many schools have stopped teaching touch-typing as a necessary office skill and are now often saying that basic computer skills are more important. I'd agree with the latter, but what about typing? I learned to type on an IBM Selectric II (and still own one, as a matter of fact) in the mid-1980s, and the last time I was tested, touch-typed at around 60 wpm. Is this an obsolete skill? With handwriting and voice recognition technologies, is using a QWERTY keyboard with nine out of ten fingers something worth knowing anymore?"

64 of 1,065 comments (clear)

  1. No by Zebra_X · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Better to understand how the computer works, and learn to type as you use it. I don't think that voice and other technologies are going replace the KeyBwa anytime soon though.

    1. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree, for me, as my computer skills increased (and irc/chatting), typing came right along. And while I did my fair share of mario and mavis beacon classes, I never learned as much as I did just getting out and using my 386. (although I do type incorrectly, I can hit over 80 WPM)

    2. Re:No by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 5, Funny
      I don't think that voice and other technologies are going replace the KeyBwa anytime soon though

      For some reason, I keep thinking of a scene in Star Trek IV where Scotty is seated at a circa-1980's computer trying to get it to operate.

      Scotty: "Computer!"

      Man in room (handing him a mouse): "Maybe you use this."

      Scotty (speaking into the mouse like it was a microphone): "COMPUTER!"

      Man in Room: "Maybe you should just use the keyboard"

      Scotty: "A keyboard? How quaint!"

    3. Re:No by POWRSURG · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have got to say that is the exact oppposite with me. In high school we had a keyboarding class that I greatly accelled in, and within a few weeks attained a score higher than my teacher had set for us for the end of the semester (giving me an A for the course for the most part). It has only been in recent years as I am IRCing and programming more that my typing skills have gone down. I often make errors that I must go back and correct, where as before I would type them correctly the first time.

      Maybe I'm in the minority, but the more I learn about computers the slower and less accurate my typing has been. Oddly enough, I rarely make mistakes with hot/shortcut-keys, except I do tend to hit Ctrl+D (shortcut to add a bookmark) rather than Alt+D (transfer focus to a highighted address bar) in Firefox.

    4. Re:No by Skater · · Score: 3, Funny

      What always gets me about that scene is that he hasn't typed once in the last five years that we've seen but can still type faster than most people I know.

      And they still use Qwerty - or at least that shop happened to be using the same layout Scotty was familiar with!

      There are other problems with that scene, too, such as the fact that he was so familiar with the software running on that Mac that he didn't even need to see it, but that's a topic for another /. discussion. :)

      --RJ

    5. Re:No by matth · · Score: 3, Funny

      Should have added that I use about 7 fingers not 10 :)

    6. Re:No by nelsonal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Isn't it odd how much easier it is to always find the correct key when reaching for a shortcut than when all the fingers are in their location on home row. I can always seem to find CTRL X,C,and V without looking when I try to cut copy or paste, but interchange them frequently while typing.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    7. Re:No by a1englishman · · Score: 5, Funny
      the fact that he was so familiar with the software running on that Mac that he didn't even need to see it

      That's because the Mac UI is so unbelievably perfect, that it hasn't changed in the period between a Mac SE and the NCC1701. Hadn't you noticed the portrait of Steve Jobs hanging in the back of the engine room, all these years?

      Flame suit on!

    8. Re:No by Skater · · Score: 5, Funny

      So, the Mac UI is a bunch of unlabeled switches and random blinking lights? ;)

      --RJ

    9. Re:No by shufler · · Score: 4, Funny

      Weird, so do I. For the record, I have all 10.

  2. Typing IS a necessary computer skill by shawnmchorse · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last time I was tested, I was at around 105 wpm with 99% accuracy. That's just a byproduct of using computers day in and day out for years though, and not a result of any typing class. I gradually developed my own touch typing system, I guess.

    1. Re:Typing IS a necessary computer skill by Incoherent07 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, in my case it was a 10th grade english class which involved 40 page "journals". I was, however, taught to touch type fairly early on.

      I want to know what crackpot thinks that you can be anywhere near good at what schools usually think of as "computer skills" (read: word processing, web design, Excel, Powerpoint, email, internet) without being able to type at a half-decent rate.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many others like it, but this one is mine.
    2. Re:Typing IS a necessary computer skill by vontrotsky · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You're lucky. I type at about 30 wpm with low accuracy. And it sucks. Hard.

      As a programmer, and halfway decent touch typing class could make my life much much better.

      Jeff

    3. Re:Typing IS a necessary computer skill by nkh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I learned to type by myself in less than a week: put a sheet of paper on your hands (to hide the keyboard) and copy a text (like a website) to a text editor. I can do 120wpm very easily now.

    4. Re:Typing IS a necessary computer skill by Chasuk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just what the hell is "prolly" supposed to be anyway?

      "Prolly" is UK slang (meaning probably), and long pre-dates IM'ing. In the UK, "brolly" is substituted for "umbrella," and "telly" for television.

      Language evolves that way. EQ'ers frequently say "pally" instead of paladin, and "shammy" instead of shaman, so this cutesification of language is quite common.

      I've even heard people say that shaman sounds stuck-up, so go figure.

    5. Re:Typing IS a necessary computer skill by gooru · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Last time I was tested, I was at around 105 wpm with 99% accuracy. That's just a byproduct of using computers day in and day out for years though, and not a result of any typing class. I gradually developed my own touch typing system, I guess.

      I believe that schools are phasing this out not because touch typing is not a necessary skill but because most of the students can already type better than the teachers. I remember taking a required typing class 11 years ago and just being bored out of my mind, because I could already type at more than 90 wpm. (This was in sixth grade.) I would finish the daily assignment in three or four mintues and then screw around with the computer the rest of the period. I'm guessing that since then, the number of kids screwing around has increased exponentially and schools finally realized the class wasn't worth teaching any more.

    6. Re:Typing IS a necessary computer skill by Chasuk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you all need to be told that RHETORICAL means that I didn't NEED an explanation?

      I understand the definition of RHETORICAL, yes. However, as I did not quote your entire remark, I included the explanation of "prolly" for those who might not have been following the thread closely.

      In other words, my intention was politeness, which you interpreted as lack of attention.

    7. Re:Typing IS a necessary computer skill by Rorschach1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was a fast enough typist that when some joker hit the 'bold' key on my typewriter and it had to double-strike everything, I'd have a whole line in the buffer by the end of a timed test. The teacher would call 'stop' and all the noise in the room would stop, except for one single typewriter - mine - going clickety-click, clickety-clik all by itself.

      Then there was the blonde next to me who always used 'bold' because it sounded like she was typing faster...

    8. Re:Typing IS a necessary computer skill by thrash242 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Somehow I doubt that most kids now can type *properly* very quickly. I'm sure they can type quickly with two fingers and using "2" for too or to, "u" for you, etc.

      Most of my typing experience at that age was from MUDding, playing old adventure games and programming. I could type very well when I took my required typing class also (except it was taught on typewriters, not computers). Most kids now have computer experience, but it's with "iming thir h0mies n talkn 2 chix". Games now rarely require typing even when on a PC, and most kids probably play games on consoles anyway. Being able to type like that even at 200 WPM won't help you in a job, most likely.

    9. Re:Typing IS a necessary computer skill by davebarz · · Score: 3, Insightful


      I type over 100 wpm (just barely over, but over) without ever taking a typing course. How did I learn? IMs. Not everyone who uses IMs speaks in that sort of shorthand. Many, many people I know utterly disdain people who type like that, and no one I know actually encourages it.

      And, even if someone does type like you are saying they do, it is absolutely true that the skill to type quickly that way will be easily adaptable to typing with proper spelling and grammar. Typing is the skill of being able to make your hands press the letters that are in your head, and that is the same whether you spell things correctly or incorrectly. You can reasonably allege that IMs are ruining kids' spelling, but not that they are ruining their typing skills.

  3. Don't think so by Giant+Ape+Skeleton · · Score: 5, Funny

    I dont thiunk typiong is a necasary skil ath all!

    --
    The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.
  4. YES. End of story. by GerbilSoft · · Score: 4, Informative

    Too many people I know don't know how to type correctly and use the hunt-and-peck method. They're amazed when I'm able to type up a 100-word paragraph in a few minutes, when it takes them up to half an hour. (I'd also classify them as AOLers, i.e. people that say "wut r u doing 2nite?" on IM services.)

    1. Re:YES. End of story. by maxbang · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sure, but if people use computers enough then they sometimes develop their own methods of typing. I guess that could be called some kind of advanced hunt and peck, but it's something. Even if it's just two fingers hunting and pecking at a blistering pace, eventually their muscles will catch up to their brains. Who says touch typing is the ultimate data entry experience?

      --
      I also reply below your current threshold.
  5. typing is absolutely necessary by the+original+m0nk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    absolutely necessary.

    how could you post to slashdot without knowing how to type?

    incidentally, how many of you out there are traditional touch-typists?

    i took a typing class waay back, but can't force myself to touch-type. but i still get around 80wpm using whichever finger happens to be around the key that i need to hit :)

    1. Re:typing is absolutely necessary by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's a pity one of those keys isn't "shift" every once in a while.

    2. Re:typing is absolutely necessary by yppiz · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The ability to type at all is necessary, sure, but touch-typing is not necessary unless you're a secretary. Touch typists, please read the rest before modding this as a flame - it's not.

      Consider the interaction between a person and a computer as an information processing system, analogous to a PC. In building an optimized system, one must consider the task and the likely bottlenecks. In building a gaming PC, for instance, disk speed and even CPU speed are often less important than the speed of the graphics card.

      When a person types on a computer, the bottleneck in accomplishing most tasks is not the bandwidth through the keyboard (typing speed) but the latency introduced by other elements of the system. Specifically, the speed of the user's reading comprehension and the speed of the user to make decisions and mentally transform ideas and concepts into text dominate typing IO for most tasks. The tasks where typing speed dominates, like rote transcription, involve very little need for comprehension, decision making, or complex thought - certainly much less than composing an email or a complex report.

      --Pat / zippy@cs.brandeis.edu

    3. Re:typing is absolutely necessary by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 5, Funny

      As bash.org says in one of the best quotes:
      Capitalization is the difference between "Helping your uncle Jack off a horse" and "helping your uncle jack off a horse".

      --
      Shameless Karmawhoring for Charity

  6. Vastly important by PatHMV · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I had typing in the 8th grade, and it was the single most practical class I ever had in school, period. You can type so much faster when you learn properly. There's a closer connection between your thoughts and getting them down in the computer. If anything, the prevalence of computers is making typing skills MORE crucial, not less. Before e-mail and word processors, bosses had clerical staff to type. Now the boss himself has to be able to type, too. So everybody needs basic keyboarding skills.

    1. Re:Vastly important by forgetmenot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Vastly important? How so?

      I write plenty of emails. Hell I'm writing THIS comment, and I never learned to "type". Can you read the words on this screen?

      I guess in general, it depends upon context (as most things do). For developers, typing is not important whatsoever despite being plopped down at a keyboard all day to do one's job. Being an effective software developer is about designing good software. How fast you can type code has absolutely no relation that I can possibly think of to effective coding because good code is generally code that was well though out and designed prior to "typing" the first line. Typing faster without thinking about the design just means you make design mistakes all that much sooner. Furthermore, the keystrokes in a typical program usually resembles nothing like prose, so learning to type probably doesn't help much. I'm a developer. I'm considered a very good developer. But I never learned to type. Neither have most developers I know.

      But for bosses? Ahhh... I dunno. None of my bosses could ever type and they seemed pretty effective. Don't know how they would have gotten where they were if they weren't.

      These aren't the good ol' days where bosses dictate messages to a secretary who can type as fast as the boss could speek. And furthermore, even in the good ol'days speech went to "shorthand" usually before it went to the typewriter, so I think it's debatable how important it has been for a much longer time than the current "computer" era. Certainly more so, but I wouldn't say more so. Even with secretaries, organization skills are more important than typing skills. Being good or fast is just icing on the cake and I would think it has been since the very beginning.

  7. I should have taken it in high school. by Soko · · Score: 4, Interesting

    *resists teptation to correct typos*

    I think taking tpyeing wuold have helpeed me now, since I'm rather poor at it today. No wonder the backspage key on my keyboars is worn out.

    Soko

    --
    "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
  8. The short answer... by Foofoobar · · Score: 4, Funny

    No. I typed this with body parts that you don't want to know about.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    1. Re:The short answer... by RicoX9 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Somehow referring to your "body parts" as the "short answer" doesn't seem very flattering for you.

  9. Ask someone who can't type by JLavezzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ask adults who use compuers a lot and can't touch type if they wish they could. I hear a lot of, "Yes, I wish I could type."

    60 WPM isn't necessary. 25 would be better than hunt-and-peck.

  10. Yes, if for no other reason than by Jens_UK · · Score: 3, Insightful

    it's boring and frustrating to watch someone type slowly, especially if you are helping them.

  11. 10 years on the net by geek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And I still don't type. I use like 3 fingers and hunt and peck the keyboard still. Everyone is shocked at how fast I can do it. I'm no 60wpm guy but I can hunt and peck as fast as I can speak and/or think with very good accuracy. I spend a little to much time looking at the keys but find that even without looking at them I'm accurate maybe 99% of the time. I just never saw the point in learning to type. My dad started me on computers years ago and since he's missing a couple fingers due to a table saw accident I just sorta followed his lead. It hasn't crippled me in any major way, although I am now an english major and hopeful writer so someday I might actually regret it. So maybe I'll learn, maybe I wont. If someone has a good reason for me to learn I'm all ears.

    1. Re:10 years on the net by aussersterne · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Here's your reason to learn to touch-type: Speed.

      People who are good and very experienced at the index-fingers method often say "I can type 40wpm easy" (or in your case, 60wpm), as though that's incredibly fast.

      But computing professionals who touch-type can hit 110-130wpm (I get 110-120 on a good day). That's about twice as fast. When you're trying to hit a deadline, especially as a writer, it's a big deal to be able to type twice as fast, and that much closer to the speed of your thoughts, not to mention the fact that if you have to type for long periods of time, your accuracy won't suffer as much and your hands/arms won't get as tired if you touch-type, because there's less movement and fewer large muscles involved.

      There's also the matter of keystrokes, something that most people aren't as familiar with. The number of keystrokes per minute is at least as important for a hardcore computer user (keystroke tests use additional keys like ctrl, alt, shift, Fn, etc. and also test for number and punctuation skill). The ability to perform ctrl, alt, or Fn keystrokes in the midst of a stream of text typing without pausing and without having to look at the keyboard provides an additional serious speed increase in real-world computer use.

      And don't underestimate the drag of having to look at the keyboard, even a little. I can fill a spreadsheet at 110-120wpm, staring at a sheet of paper full of numbers the entire time, using tab and arrow keys for navigation, no pauses needed, just a continuous flow of keywork. I never once have to look at the screen and because I touch type, I know the minute I have made a typing error and can backspace and fix it, all without looking. I would guess that it would take you more than twice as long to enter a page full of numbers and formulae into a spreadsheet application, even if your measured typing speed is half of mine.

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    2. Re:10 years on the net by Pentagram · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When you're trying to hit a deadline, especially as a writer, it's a big deal to be able to type twice as fast

      At 130 wpm you could write a short novel (40k words) in 5 or 6 hours... that's not how it works. I suppose it might be different if you were writing very systematic technical documentation, but generally the bottleneck is almost always thinking time. It doesn't make much difference if you're typing at 30 or 130 wpm.

      Which is not to say touch-typing is not useful -- it's much more comfortable and means you don't have to look at the keyboard, as you say.

      Touch-typing is probably the most useful skill I taught myself before going to university. (I wasn't allowed to take "keyboard skills" at school previously - that was apparently for kids who couldn't cope with any other classes. I wonder if they think differently now).

  12. A necessary skill? by btsdev · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is this an obsolete skill? With handwriting and voice recognition technologies, is using a QWERTY keyboard with nine out of ten fingers something worth knowing anymore?

    Uhh... Last I checked, it's the year 2004 and we haven't stopped using keyboards. How could typing, in the furthest stretch of the imagination, be an "obsolete skill?" Let's ask this question again in a decade from now when people might actually stop using keyboards. Unless I'm horribly misinformed, voice recognition is nowhere near popular and just about 99% of the population is still using the QWERTY layout.

  13. Re:It depends on what you mean... by clmensch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I call shenanigans. I don't see how using two fingers on a standard keyboard could ever be faster and more accurate than using ten. Your 80wpm...is there any kind of accuracy metric to provide along with that?

    --
    There is no gravity...the earth just sucks.
  14. FIRST POST! by underpar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Darn.. typed too slow.

    I took a one semester typing class in 6th grade.... I think the old BBSes at 2400 baud helped my typing the most.

  15. Good typing skills = less RSI by Hacksaw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good typing means wrists raised in order to get the most strength and endurance, needed with the old manual typewriters. This also means better blood flow, which prevents RSI, at least to some degree.

    It also means less time waiting for your hands to catch up with your mind, and so gets out of the way of the creative process.

    --

    All the technology in the world won't hide your lack of vision, talent, or understanding.

  16. It is a very useful skill. by LordZardoz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Learning to type properly is a very useful skill. Using a keyboard is a very efficient way to write out your thoughts.

    The subtle benefit of knowing how to type properly is that you can actually type in complete sentences, and not come accross as being retarded in an e-mail or instant message conversation. You will still make typos and spelling mistakes (as I am sure I have in this post), but the post is in recognizable english.

    when u dont use sentences nd use lots of abbreviations but not punctuation it tends to b noticd

    END COMMUNICATION

  17. Obligatory Dvorak post by rleibman · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have nothing to say to this, but it's a keyboard related topic and I must thus write something about Dvorak keyboards, in which I type and which are so much superior to Qwerty.

    Can someone tie Dvorak into the subject a bit better?

  18. Typing tests for IT jobs by kstenson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was speaking to a colleague who was running interviews for a post in his organization when he told me that part of the interview he made them do a typing test.

    His reasoning was anyone that has spent a decent amount of time in front of a computer will be a good typist - it was a good way to see who was just talking the talk without the know how.

    Pretty clever I thought :)

  19. I Beg to Differ by 4of12 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had avoided fluffy classes in high school such as driver's ed, basket weaving and, yes, typing.

    Then, as I started university I discovered that typing away on a terminal would really be more efficient if I had some QWERTY skills.

    So I specifically enrolled in a typing class just long enough to get up to about 35 wpm before stopping (and technically failing the course).

    But I got what I wanted. I needed to learn how to do keyboarding so that computer programming and creating documents on the computer was tolerable. I've hardly ever touched the IBM Selectric since the class.

    Fortunately, I've never had quite the frequent need arise to learn how to 10-key, but I've been impressed by the people who do know this skill.

    At some point I might try to become proficient with the Handi-Key chorded input; it seems like a great way for one-handed input, especially for small devices, in meetings, riding in cars, etc.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  20. The perfect tool for teaching it... by ALecs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes - it should be taught....with

    The Typing of the Dead!

    As stupid as it sounds - this game is SO cool. And it showed my how badly I really can't type.

  21. absolutely essential by Nuttles · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Heck yeah, typing is essential. I would argue that it is especially essential to any programmer or network administrator. The faster and more proficient you are at typing the faster you can get your ideas into production or solve problems. Not only typing out words, but also keyboard shortcuts in programs you use everyday will make you a better programmer/network admin. The less you reach for a mouse the faster you go and the less breaks in thought a worker will have. Also, when working with other people it is a great help. For example, if I ask a coworker to help me debug some code, typing proficiency makes the process so much easier. If you can navigate as fast as you or your fellow coworker can think there is no hindrance to your work (navigating with a keyboard is much faster than with a mouse in most cases). Bad typing skills, just slows everything down. This is costly when your work environment demands results ASAP.

    Nuttles

  22. Some online typing tests by Lev13than · · Score: 5, Informative

    (although I do type incorrectly, I can hit over 80 WPM)

    This comment made me realize that I had no idea how fast I could type (never took a course). So, after a quick search here are some free on-line typing tests:

    TypingPal.com
    TypingTest.com

    Turns out that I'm in the 2nd decile with a respectable 58 wpm (mean is approx. 40, and anyone who claims >100 is either in the 99.8%-ile or is full of BS). A thorough analysis of typing speeds can be found here.

    --
    When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    1. Re:Some online typing tests by Altrag · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is something that has consistently annoyed me. The reason backspacing is "soooo" bad is a layover from typewriter era as best I can tell --even on a typewriter with a good working backspace, if you don't notice it before you've gone to the next line, you throw the page away.

      This of course is complete BS in a modern word processor. I frequently use not only the backspace key, but things like word-left and the end key to correct my mistakes in a fraction of the time it would take to backspace all the way back and fix it.

      A modern typing test should really do a few things:
      a) measure mistakes after the entire text is typed. Would work even better with a count-up clock and a "Done" button than with a count-down clock like typingtest has.
      b) allow you to use the full range of editing keys in , including things like autocorrect and autocomplete (even when they autocomplete something wrong). Of course this is highly impractical unless the typing test is actually built into the word processor, but thats about the only way to get accurate real-world results using that particular program.

      Until those two conditions are met, typing tests of this sort are pretty much only measuring how fast you can type on a really really fast typewriter.

    2. Re:Some online typing tests by Audacious · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I used to type over 110wpm. Keyboards still can not keep up with how fast I can type. (Or is it I'm just not hitting the keys correctly anymore? :-O Oh well!) Arthritis is beginning to have an impact on how fast and how long I can type also. The repetitive strain on my tendons and muscles (after typing more than 30 years) is also making it harder and harder to type very quickly for long periods of time.

      Although it will be a great boon to be able to talk to your computer and have it type out whatever it is you are saying - I can still type faster than I can talk.

      I have also shown people, in the past just how quickly I can type. I have them say a sentence and I type it in verbatim, just as they said it. Usually, I finish at the same time they finish speaking (like a second or so afterwards to be truthful). However, as I said above, age is beginning to show and I am not now as fast as I used to be.

      However, it has always frustrated me that computers, which are supposed to be so much faster than a preson at doing anything - can't accept input faster than it presently can. I have heard that this is done on purpose. Seems a shame that keyboard manufacturers feel that they have the right to slow everyone down. :-/

      --
      Someone put a black hole in my pocket and now I'm broke. :-)
    3. Re:Some online typing tests by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 5, Informative

      TypingPal was also terrible because it assumed any attempt to hit backspace was an invalid key and marked you accordingly - which meant that one error became two since everyone used to typing on a computer has an unstoppable instant backspace reflex. Also, other automatic reflex actions became errors as well - like hitting space twice after
      ending a sentence with a period - since the source text has only one space between sentences, that extra space was a "mistake". Also, sometimes it wrapped the cursor to the start of the next line as soon as you hit the end of a previous line. Other times it did not. Thus you had to watch where the cursor went or end up with an "error" from hitting return when you weren't supposed to.

      Also, the tendency of the interface to not do what my reflexes expected it to do was a source of cognative dissonance that added more errors - like when backspace didn't visually do anything, I'd hit the key again several more times by reflex before my brain caught up and stopped me, and this results in losing precious seconds to stop and think.

      Typing is a reflex action - but these tests ruin this by turning it into a congative one by making the interface not work as you'd expect it to, so you have to always stop and not be "in the groove" where you type unthinkingly.

      My speed with the test was - 62 words per minute, with 17 errors (really only about 4 errors, but each error resulted in three or four others being counted since I keep on typing the rest of the word before I notice the cursor isn't advancing and so the stupid test thinks I'm trying (and failling) to finally get that letter right when really I'm just typing the rest of the word.)

      I guess that a more real-world test would put my speed at about 65 WPM after errors are accounted for (probably about 80 WPM raw, with 15 WPM lossage from backspacing. I backspace a lot, which is why an input tool that makes backspacing fail to operate the way it naturally should gives me a low score. Not only does the backspacing itself penalize me (understandable), but the cognative dissonance that breaks my stride when the interface behaves in a crippled fashion wrecks my speed far more than that.).

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  23. Let's face it by GoClick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's a limited amount of time to teach students how to do anything in school and even students who want to go into technical careers need to learn the other things. I'd certainly rather hire a developer who is proficient at mathematics than one who can type using all his fingers, let alone the two superfluous nubs we call pinkies.

    Lets say students have 2 hours a week of mandatory computing classes, It would be better spent teaching them how to learn to use a computer on their own, or how to research things, how to figure stuff out, how to have fun and otherwise get the most out of a computer so they'll want to learn more, rather than forcing them to pound on keys.

    If high speed typing is so damn important the school boards should switch to Dvorak and we all know it.

    Besides most jobs really require very little computer use, even good jobs and seldom do they require touch typing. Only typists, dictators and secretaries would truly benefit from spending hours learning that over say learning how a computer works.

    And as /.ers and people who make money from computers, shouldn't we do all we can to keep people away from them to keep our wages up?

  24. Yes by nanojath · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you're talking about clerical work, typing is absolutely still a necessary skill. Whoever said that employers no longer specify WPM or that 30 WPM is sufficient for most clerical jobs was simply wrong. Read the want ads. I got a typing test at each of the three temp agencies I've worked for and over the last 5 years been administered several typing tests applying for jobs.

    It is not a substitute for computer skills. You need both in any modern office job with an emphasis on writing. I don't think typing should be required (I never took it in school, I taught myself to touch type, it ain't rocket science). But it should be offered.

    --

    It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

  25. Other implications by AllenChristopher · · Score: 4, Interesting
    If you learn to type via trial and error speedhacks, you have a tendency to AOL type, just as the parent said.

    That's a problem. It brings accents into the typing realm. British people AOLspeak very differently from Americans. Australians tend to just type relatively well, which is odd, but they do have their own short forms.

    The various slangs are based on whatever shorter way there is to spell the way the typist pronounces a word. Unlike the original online abbreviations such as LOL and ROFL, these new ones are not based on the typographic version of the word.

    Accents online is something we don't need. The beauty of someone typing properly is that anyone can read that text and understand it, short of something like "lift" vs. "elevator". I couldn't walk into Manchester's poorer districts and converse reliably. I now find the same is true of typing with Manchester residents.

    With Brit AOLSpeak, the first phrase you have to learn is "soz wot" which I think means "sorry, I don't follow." The second phrase is "i fink u spk 2 mingin posh u bastard" meaning "I am angry that you don't type the way I do." I'm not making that up, though I profess no great mastery of the form.

    Even within the single local group, the AOL speak tends to vary based on what kind of half-assed typing is being used. People who use three fingers on each hand choose different short forms than those who use only the indexes.

    Just as we need other web standards, we need a standard way of writing. It's not unprecedented... consider italic and cursive.

  26. How quaint! by Sloppy · · Score: 5, Funny
    The implication is that he hasn't used a keyboard in decades.

    Picture little Scotty, 10 years old at school, whining, "But Mrs. Crabapple, when are we going to use a keyboard?"

    "Quiet, Mr. Scott, and just do the assignment!"

    Turns out she was right. If Scotty had skipped class that day, the earth might not have been saved.

    Same goes for the day when Mrs. Crabapple taught the class how to use 300-year-old MacPaint as a chemical engineering program. You just never know when the little trivia you learn, may be useful.

    Kirk probably couldn't have done that, because when he was in school, he hacked the computer to let him run a real chemical engineering program, instead of MacPaint.

    "Stupid Mrs. Crabapple. I bet she never rotated the display of a Aluminum alloy structure in 3D, by using the airbrush tool. Well, I'll show her!"

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:How quaint! by Mike+deVice · · Score: 5, Funny
      What's truely astonishing is that after pecking at the keyboard for 15 seconds, he managed to get a Mac Plus to display a 3D molecular model.

      How's that for typing skills? ;)

  27. You over-estimate by kajoob · · Score: 3, Funny

    how could you post to slashdot without knowing how to type?

    Many people post to slashdot apparently without having the ability to read ;-)

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
  28. wpm? by Psymunn · · Score: 5, Funny

    words per minute? you insensitive americans. i believe the SI measumerunt is l/s (letters per second).

    --
    The Neo-Bohemian Techno-Socialist
  29. IRC #trivia by TrevorB · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's nothing that can humble you more quickly than playing trivia on an IRC channel. Knowledge is often only about 50% of what's required. Speedy and accurate typing is just as important.

    Unfortunately capitalization is not required in these games, which is why you're probably seeing a bunch of people bragging about their 110 wpm typing skills with a complete inability to capitalize a sentence properly.

  30. You're all "haves". by Weasel+Boy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Shawnmchorse and all you other typing speed demons, you're fast becasue you're already plugged into the computing world; you have to type fast to keep up. The article is more about kids who are being shut out of computing because they don't have the KB skills to get in the door yet.

    I touch-type in two different systems; my SO hunts and pecks at amazing speed. Both of us are the product of using computers for over 20 years (and, probably more importantly, MUDs and IM for over 10).

    Should young kids start being introduced to basic keyboard skills in school? Absolutely! We don't need to mass-produce 60-WPM touch-typists, but we owe it to the kids to teach the skills they need to effectively use computers.

  31. Re:Yes by HBPiper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I agree. But if it really came down to it, touch typing does require learning in a disciplined environment such as in a school. What passes for "Computer Skills" do not. I think most people pick up more "Computer Skills" on their own then ever do in a class. And for the money spent on computer labs in our local schools, the contents of those labs seem horribly irrelevant. IMHO, real computer skills revolve around tool making, not tool using.

    --
    "I went on a diet, swore off drinking and heavy eating. And in fourteen days, I had lost exactly two weeks. Joe E. Lewis
  32. it is at least partially dvorak by mnemonic_ · · Score: 4, Informative

    What's special about the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard is its more efficient key placement. QWERTY was purely intended to reduce typewriter jams (though not necessarily make typing slower), with no regard given to letter frequency in the english language (Why is "e" not on the home row?) nor the difficulty of reaching different rows. Upon viewing the layout it should be quite apparent to the layperson how much simpler it is than QWERTY. The Dvorak layout not only allows for faster typing, but also a lower occurrence of repetitive stress injury.

  33. High School typing class by Shant3030 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I say it time and time again...

    The only class that I ever learned anything from, and still use the skills from, is my high school typing class.

    --
    100% Insightful
  34. Also should have added... by badasscat · · Score: 3, Informative

    I also forgot to say that the standard touch-typing posture can easily lead to carpal tunnel or repetitive stress disorder because of the angle of your hands on a standard keyboard. This is one reason so-called "ergonomic" keyboards exist. But the way I've taught myself to type, my hands are naturally angled even on a straight keyboard, so I can type for extremely long periods without any fatigue and I've been typing hours per day for 20 years now with no problems at all. Something I think is really important to think about given how much some of us have to type - you can always buy an ergonomic keyboard for yourself if you're a touch-typist but you may not have that luxury at work, or in internet cafes, or wherever else you use a PC. So I think in some ways it's actually better to learn alternate ways of typing; whatever's most comfortable for you.