Slashdot Mirror


Roxio To Concentrate on Online Music Business

DevGhost writes "Roxio Inc. said on Monday it would change its name to Napster and focus on the money-losing online digital music service, selling its profitable CD and DVD software division to Sonic Solutions for $80 million."

84 of 288 comments (clear)

  1. MBA by Mateito · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is what happens when you let an MBA run an organisation.

    1. Re:MBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Do you suggest letting pimply-faced nerds run a business?

      Like Bill Gates?

    2. Re:MBA by Metallic+Matty · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am no an MBA, nor am I trying to defend them. But that is a gross generalization. MBA's are only viewed as money wasting company destroyers because that's all they get press for. When a business is run well, and has success, as the result of a hard working MBA, it doesn't exactly make news.

    3. Re:MBA by the+unbeliever · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's because hard working MBA's don't exist except in fantasy. :P

    4. Re:MBA by CarrionBird · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You are probably right to a degree, but have you heard the crap that business schools are teaching these days?

      I have started to be of the opinion that many of the problems in the economy and society that we complain about here on /. are the results of generations of leaders that actually believe in these stupid ideas.

      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
    5. Re:MBA by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not everyone who runs a successful business is an MBA and not everybody who runs a company into the ground is one either. The bad rep of MBAs comes primarily from the crazy and heady days of the dot com boom where lots of inexperienced, freshly minted MBAs with little or no real-world business experience were running companies on a wing and a prayer. The real question is does the nerd have the ability to go out and be a front face of the company, to generate high level sales, to focus on profitable markets and know when to give up on unprofitable ones. If so, he or she could be a fine choice to run a business - knowledge of the technology is definitely a plus, but isn't itself sufficient to justify letting "the pimply-faced nerd" run a business (and by the way, some of us do know how to practice personal hygiene, and still understand technology).

    6. Re:MBA by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Reminds me of the FedEx commercial: Office Wench showing a PHB-In-Training how FedEx is sent. The PHBIT say something like "But I don't do FedEx. I have an MBA . To which the Office Wench responds: "Oh. OK, have a seat. This may take some time..."

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    7. Re:MBA by John+Newman · · Score: 2, Insightful
      MBA's are only viewed as money wasting company destroyers because that's all they get press for. When a business is run well, and has success, as the result of a hard working MBA, it doesn't exactly make news.
      When a business is run well, and has success, it's often not run by an MBA. :)

      Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Jack Welch, Sam Palmisano, Michael Dell, Larry Ellison... I can't even name one major tech CEO, off the top of my head, who has an MBA.
    8. Re:MBA by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Gates was never a pimply-faced nerd.

      He was a money-greedy rich kid from day one.

      Paul Allen was the nerd.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    9. Re:MBA by twiddlingbits · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And I came name a 1000 other business leaders who DO have MBAs. The CEO is not the ONLY decision maker in a firm, many of them are more involved in Marketing, PR, meeting with Wall St., being an industry lobbist, etc. than what goes on at the "shop". Rarely do you see a CEO who actually "runs" the business, that is the job of the COO and the VPs. You also seem to forget that the CEO has a Board of Directors s/he has to confer with, and shareholders s/he has to keep happy. It is NOT an easy job with or without an MBA.

    10. Re:MBA by John+Newman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't believe I got a "Troll" mod for pointing out that MBA's aren't the be-all and end-all of business acumen. There must be a few bored MBA students with mod points today. :)

      You got your long list of MBA's a few posts down, I presume, from the 2003 CEO Magazine survey of CEOs - the same one that found that only 36% of Fortune 200/500/700 CEO's have MBA's. More pointedly, I will assert that non-MBA's are heavily enriched in "founding CEO's" - arguably the most valuable group, to their companies and to the economy. CEO is an incredibly difficult job, and having an MBA has little or nothing to do with success in it.

      I certainly agree that MBA's are heavily represented in middle-management. And that quality middle-management is essential to any successful company. I'm unconvinced of the correlation between those two statements, however. GE, for example, has a long tradition of breeding managers of the highest-quality, and they don't turn to MBA schools to do it. I think it's also telling that the most common undergrad major among those Fortune X00 CEO's is engineering.

    11. Re:MBA by Rufus88 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I haven't heard the crap that they are teaching these days. Would you care to enlighten us about all the "stupid ideas" they are now foisting upon "generations of leaders"?

  2. Sounds like a solid business plan by hattig · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder how many of the board of that company also moved with the profitable portion of the company, leaving the employees and the unpopular directors and managers with the loss making portion?

    1. Re:Sounds like a solid business plan by darth_MALL · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm not sure they are really all that profitable, except for the cash influx from selling the CD burning part. I'm not a financial type by any means, but I think they are damned whether they sell off or not. Here's the stock quote for Roxio

    2. Re:Sounds like a solid business plan by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to Roxio's latest quarterly report (three months ending June 30, 2004) on page 18, the "Consumer software" segment of Roxio did make money: on $22,048,000 of revenues, it made $4,585,000. The music segment didn't do so well: on $7,867,000 of revenue, it lost $8,136,000.

  3. Newsflash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Roxio commits corporate suicide. Film at 11...

    1. Re:Newsflash! by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Roxio commits corporate suicide. Film at 11...

      First there was the dot.com bubble... then it burst...

      now corporations are intent on seeing that movement continue. Watch for the new dot.com suck. First SCO making a side business of OS production and concentrating on making their own customers hate them, now Roxio going for an even bigger/quicker dive.

      Next up, watch Dell decide to sell off their computer production business and go into making bathmats. or something.

    2. Re:Newsflash! by robslimo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Roxio commits corporate suicide. Film at 11...

      Nah, they are actually very shrewd and forward-looking. They know that if not now, then eventually something like the INDUCE act will be made law, effectively making illegal CD & DVD burners as well as Roxio's (formerly Adaptec's) popular duping software.

      They're just gittin out while the gittin is good, see?

    3. Re:Newsflash! by ericdano · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Exactly. They finally get some good software happening, and then they want to flush it away to join the "online music revolution"?!?!?!

      Wonder if they are taking odds in Vegas on how long they will last........

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    4. Re:Newsflash! by Dmala · · Score: 3, Funny

      Next up, watch Dell decide to sell off their computer production business and go into making bathmats. or something.

      Hey, that wouldn't be a bad idea. I mean, I can knock together a decent PC in an hour or two, but a good bathmat? That's hard to come by.

  4. Really by Frothy+Walrus · · Score: 2, Funny

    You mean that the 3 copies of Toast that everyone pirated didn't keep them alive?

    1. Re:Really by dasmegabyte · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Read the fuckin' summary. The CD/DVD burning division -- which makes DirectCD and the AWESOME toast application -- is profitable. Meaning, it makes profit.

      Roxio is SELLING the profitable part of their business to concentrate on the stuff that's not working.

      Why? Because they're dumb.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    2. Re:Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Here's another take on WHY:

      They don't want to be sued and/or have their software declared illegal.

      If I were a CEO and I saw the RIAA/MPAA filing numerous claims against my competition, I would be pretty scared too. Think: 321 Studios. Call it potential gain vs potential loss.

      Honestly, look at where the burning software market is going. The best selling/most popular products are the ones that do something that the people who love copyright want to stop. Here are some examples:

      - Copying 'protected' CDs (SafeDisc, etc)
      - Copying DVDs to CD
      - Copying DVDs to DVD
      - Burning audio to CD (especially despised when burning DRM'ed files)

      Seriously, the best burning products are the ones that are next in line to be sued out of existance. Why? Because they let the consumer do what they want with their media.

      Remember, the 4-letter AA's don't honestly think they can stop all copyright infringement, but they also know they can stop a lot of it by taking the software that does it easily/cheaply/effectively off the shelves.

      Induce Act anyone?

      Just some food for thought.

    3. Re:Really by el+cisne · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now the names "Roxio" and "Toast" seem to make more sense than ever.

  5. $17 billion? by Patik · · Score: 4, Funny
    Legal battles are still pending in federal court over whether investors who backed the original Napster sustained the service and helped it cost the music industry a purported $17 billion in lost sales.
    It did? Says who, the same people who say my CD burner is really the same as 52 burners?
  6. Great business model. by zipcube · · Score: 5, Funny

    Board member #1: "Hey, let's sell our profitable division so that we can focus on one that will never make money ever."

    Board Member #2: "Brilliant!"

    1. Re:Great business model. by CommanderData · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe they're evil board members from a parallel universe (with goatees of course, how else could we tell them apart?). They're trying to make the company SO unprofitable it will generate anti-cash , which of course is worth a fortune in their home universe...

      --
      Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
    2. Re:Great business model. by Maestro4k · · Score: 5, Funny
      • Maybe they're evil board members from a parallel universe (with goatees of course, how else could we tell them apart?). They're trying to make the company SO unprofitable it will generate anti-cash , which of course is worth a fortune in their home universe...
      Does this mean they'll try to sell their good music on Napster then?
    3. Re:Great business model. by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 5, Funny

      They are ignoring the rule "never apply a Star Trek solution to a Babylon 5 problem."

      --
      No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
    4. Re:Great business model. by saider · · Score: 2, Funny


      Board member #1: "Hey, let's sell our profitable division so that we can focus on one that will never make money ever."

      Board Member #2: "Brilliant!"


      Board Member #3 : Or we could relocate to Endor?

      Board Member #4 : But we are 6 feet tall and Endor is populated with Ewoks that are only three feet tall. That plan doesn't make any sense.

      Board Member #3 : OK, lets just sell the part of our company that makes money.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
  7. Napster... by SpiritOfGrandeur · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Napster on the stock ticker... who would have thought that was going to happen 5 years ago?!

    1. Re:Napster... by SYFer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And IMO, it's unlikely we'll see it there 5 years from now either.

      --
      "...all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness..." yada yada
  8. Talk about putting all your eggs in one basket... by ghettoboy22 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First Adaptec, then Roxio, now Napster.

    Boy they're sure good at picking business models. Funny how an individual who changes professions every few years is viewed badly upon by creditors, yet companies who go through disposable business plans the same way are "innovative".

    On the good side though, I think this will be their last name change before Chapter 11(, Inc.). Seriously, what part of focus on the money-losing online digital music service, selling its profitable CD and DVD software division doesn't sound like the bubble all over again.

    Bah... whatev. Just as long as someone keeps supporting Toast, I won't yell too loud.

  9. Let's see if I have this straight: by burgburgburg · · Score: 5, Funny
    1) Sell money making divisions
    2) Focus on money losing division
    3) ???
    4) Profit!

    I like their moxie!

    1. Re:Let's see if I have this straight: by artemis67 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think the atmosphere over there must be more like:

      1) ???
      2) ???
      3) ???...

      4) ???!

  10. I am not a business leader... by MaestroSartori · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...but how does it make sense to sell the profitable part of a business and keep the unprofitable part? "Focussing" on the unprofitable part to try and fix it, yeah, I can see the sense in that, but getting rid of the bit that keeps the money coming in while you sort the problems out?

    Insanity!

    1. Re:I am not a business leader... by wfberg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They probably need to invest gobs of money in their unprofitable operations to get them to turn a profit. Their options were

      * Loan a bunch of money from banks or private investors, on the strength of your profitable unit.
      * Sell the profitable unit for a lump sum many times its annual profit and invest in in the online business.
      * Sell off the unprofitable unit and let it die.

      They've retained the final option (they can always decide to fire everybody, though that's not cheap), and they've got a handfull of cash (no strings attached, unlike bankloans or investors) AND the assets of the online business so they don't even have to start a business from scratch to invest it in.

      If it all makes sense depends greatly on what their plans are with the cash they've just earned, and the premium of getting a was of cash over other means of investment. It's still likely their online business will die, but if it does, it won't drag the profitable business down into Chapter 11. Possibly saving jobs.

      What it comes down to is that the company thought it's unprofitable online music business is a better investment than the profitable business. It's a high risk strategy, so likely they think the potential reward is great. Whether they're wrong, well, they're right about the risk, so we'll see.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    2. Re:I am not a business leader... by Maestro4k · · Score: 2
      • ...but how does it make sense to sell the profitable part of a business and keep the unprofitable part? "Focussing" on the unprofitable part to try and fix it, yeah, I can see the sense in that, but getting rid of the bit that keeps the money coming in while you sort the problems out?
      Not to accuse anyone of anything (in case predatory lawyes are lurking about) but perhaps to short the stock and rake in money from that? It's not often you can legally predict that a company is going to die a horrible flaming death.
  11. In other news ... by operagost · · Score: 4, Funny

    I quit my lucrative job in IT to begin selling igloos to Eskimos.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  12. Crap. by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Funny

    I actually like EZCD better than RecordNow. Bummer it will be going away.

  13. Oh goody by krog · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was waiting for Napster to die again.

    1. Re:Oh goody by archen · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is going to get sort of old after the third or forth time. It's like Friday the 13th movies for the next millennium. I think I'll start ignoring it long before "Napster takes Manhatten".

  14. Re:Talk about putting all your eggs in one basket. by JPelorat · · Score: 5, Informative

    Adaptec != Roxio. Adaptec sold their EZ-CD Creator cd-burning software to Roxio, but they aren't the same company.

    --
    Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
  15. What crack are they smoking? by KajiCo · · Score: 4, Funny

    April 1st isn't for another 9 months.

  16. You forgot.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Board Member #3: ??????

    Board Member #4: "Profit!"

  17. Now if only by bob670 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Microsoft will buy Ahead/Nero and integrate it into Windows we can call that category dead as well. Roxio - EZCD = t3h b4nkRup+ soonly.

  18. doesn't anyone remember 2000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What idiots - sounds just like the good old dot.com days. I worked at a company like that where there was a single mainstay product that was profitable, and a bunch of junky websites that were not. Roxio sounds just like that, only they just threw out their single profitable tentpole.

    And now they are throwing themselves solidly in the path of several oncoming trains in Apple, Microsoft, and Sony.

    Short this pig!

  19. Now they can focus that juggernaut... by scotay · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...that they use to make their media software so gosh-darn reliable and redirect it towards making napster more impossible to uninstall.

  20. very nearsighted by Stevyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why are we and the editors assuming this is bad? I'm sure they have people who know the details and have predicted future markets to justify this. Just because one is profitable and one is losing now doesn't mean it will be the same 5 years from now. Hell, if the headline 20 years ago said IBM would sell off it's profitable typewriter business and focus on it's losing computer word processing business would everyone have said it would be stupid?

    1. Re:very nearsighted by rainman_bc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Basically the editors are assuming it's bad because in a sea of competition, Napster's at the back of the heap. iTunes benefits from first-past-the-post, and a tonne of working capital. Microsoft's will benefit from their monopoly and a tonne of Capital. Really, Napster has less money than most of its competitors, and the competition's become very cutthroat.

      It's gone from a non existant market to a highly competitive one. Good luck. Nero's way better than EZCD anyway. Less bloatware garbage gui crap than EZCD IMHO.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  21. Best thing that could happen right now... by artemis67 · · Score: 5, Funny

    would be to get Apple together with Toast and Jam. Hopefully, Steve will gobble them up. It makes me hungry just thinking about the possibilities...

  22. They're going to concentrate on... by Future+Linux-Guru · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...going out of business faster.

    Sounds like the old Napster.

  23. Facinating... by blogtim · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had to rub my eyes to make sure the news was real... I bet there is a really good story behind this. What does Roxio have that Apple and Microsoft don't? Roxio has links with every CD/DVD hardware manufacturer. It's software is embedded in XP. How does the market for online music compare to that of CD/DVD recording software (hmm, its sort of related...). The answer I bet will be in the Sonic Solutions documentation. What are the caveats to the sale? The folks at Roxio aren't dumb... they've done quite well.

    --
    Visit Tim's Journal, yes?
    1. Re:Facinating... by whatmot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are right on the money.
      Exactly what I have been told from an insider @ Roxio. Why stick with a saturated roxio market when you can dominate in a young digital music market by practically owning the distribution channels.

  24. Maybe Not such a bad idea... by hubs99 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What if Microsoft bundles a DVD/CD - burning program with LongHorn? Then this might not be such a bad idea for Roxio. The software is great but if microsoft is playing the browser-war with burning software then its potentially a good thing for the ROxio company.

    Also to consider are new DRM rules. Roxio could have to do major upgrading to the software to enable proper DRM and even then Microsoft/MPAA could decide its not good enough.

    What is a great product now does not mean that it will always be the best. You have to admit that CD/DVD burning software is kind of a one-trick-pony-kind-of software that does not have great potential for growth. Sooner or later Microsoft will start to integrate burning capabilities like Apple.

    Also another thing to consider is with growing HD sizes CD burning I am assuming is decreasing. also with MP3 players, which I am assuming will lead to MP3 car players, CDr's could potentially.. gasp.. die. Leaving ROxio with a sinking ship.

    Just some thoughts as to why they would do this drastic move

    1. Re:Maybe Not such a bad idea... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What if Microsoft bundles a DVD/CD - burning program with LongHorn? Then this might not be such a bad idea for Roxio. The software is great

      You must have used a different Roxio than I did. Even the platinum version is canned crap. Nero beats it pants down (as in, beats the pants off of it.)

      Toast is quite good, but I would guess that the CD burning support in OSX is not as crappy as the CD burning support in XP, which is just licensed from Roxio anyway. Easy CD Creator sucked ass when Adaptec sold it, and it sucks now that Roxio sells it. It's poor at mastering and poor at burning.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  25. it's called capital... by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Insightful
    but getting rid of the bit that keeps the money coming in while you sort the problems out?

    Raises capital- ie money you can use to invest or buy things to make more money.

    Someone no doubt sat down and figured out how much money Napster could potentially make, and how much Toast etc would make.

    It could be that profits are leveling off (since OS X supports CD/DVD burning decently, that wouldn't be surprising) and so the company is taking a chance. Selling off their existing products gives them a lump of cash to use for working on Napster- something like, say, a stupid Superbowl commercial.

  26. Re:Talk about putting all your eggs in one basket. by The-Bus · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Blockquoth the poster:
    Funny how an individual who changes professions every few years is viewed badly upon by creditors, yet companies who go through disposable business plans the same way are "innovative".


    If you pay your bills on time and have reserves (money in the bank), changes in profession aren't viewed badly upon. It's when you're changing your profession and you've had late car payments and you've got $3000 to live on...

    On the good side though, I think this will be their last name change before Chapter 11(, Inc.). Seriously, what part of focus on the money-losing online digital music service, selling its profitable CD and DVD software division doesn't sound like the bubble all over again.


    Let's say Napster needed $50m in cash in the next three months to be able to put together a plan to become a major contender in online music distribution networks. Maybe they need to pay $5m to each major label, get a huge server farm, whatever. They know what they need, but they don't have any capital. Selling the profitable division is a good business idea if through this change, Napster can become wildly profitable.

    Whether that is going to happen or not, I don't know. Napster has name recognition on one side, but then again you don't think "legal downloads" when you think Napster.

    If, however, Napster spends most of the $70m in cash that it's going to get on Super Bowl ads, then yes, they learned nothing from the .com bubble.
    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  27. While this may be a dumb move . . . . by rchorse2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it's hard to say for sure. They may have very legitimate reasons for doing this. The CD/DVD software side of the business might be in decline and headed for unprofitability, so they're cashing out while they can. They may also have deals and/or plans on the napster side they're not disclosing publicly that make this decision rational. Those deals with universities are an example. Another possibility is that they have a completely different (and very profitable) project they want to try and need the cash to be able to do it.

    Of course, another possibility is that they're complete morons who are giving themselves a cranial enema. Only time will tell.

  28. Re:News Flash by proj_2501 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    iTMS isn't the first in the download-for-pay market, though. I doubt Apple's leadership would let the store eat through all their money before killing it anyway.

    Wishful thinking on your part.

  29. The Real Business Plan by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 4, Insightful
    1) Sell profitable division for $80 Million

    2) CEO and major board members retire wealthy, leaving mess for someone else to worry about.

    3) Tell next victim how the previous company tanked without your guidance.

    Sounds like MBA standard operating practices 101, the college class than can be substituted for ethics. The next CEO will just inflate earnings, claim huge savings by outsourcing, hide losses and try to bail before their caught.

    There's a sucker born every minute.

  30. makes sense... by tyroneking · · Score: 3, Insightful
    As others in this thread have pointed out, Roxio's products are under threat from new functionality in XP so there might not be a lot of growth left in the company.

    So they decide to get some cash and shares ("Roxio will receive $70 million cash and $10 million in Sonic shares") and look to invest in a business where growth is possible - and that's on-line music distribution.

    So long as they don't fritter away their cash pile they should be able to turn a handsome profit and achieve significant growth.

    On-line music distribution has the potential for big bucks because companies are able to charge, and consumers willing to pay, CD-prices for something as cheap as electronic files - the consumer pays for the PCs, MP3 devices and even the distribution channel (the 'net). Roxio/Napster gets to globalise a low-cost business model (bling!), leverage the Napster brand both on-line and badging the p***-poor, but cheaper, iPod alternatives (bling!), consumers feel cool (bling!) and the record industry gets to pay its (mainly) US stars big bucks for doing as little as the do now (bling!).

    It's bling-bling all round! Hooray!

    Of course, I will miss talking to those record shop sales staff who, over the years, have turned me on to all kinds of different music (Television, Foo Fighters, etc.) - and cool UK bands will have trouble acessing these new 'net-based distribution channels without a fight - but hey, who needs human interaction and good (i.e. not-rap;) music when we can let Napster rip us off in the comfort of our own homes!

  31. This just in... by Hockney+Twang · · Score: 3, Funny

    In other news, Sonic Solutions has acquired the former assets of Roxio, and has changed its name to "Roxio." The remainder of Sonic Solutions assets have been sold to the former Napster, now changing its name to "Sonic Solutions."

  32. Re:Talk about putting all your eggs in one basket. by Clith · · Score: 4, Informative
    Actually, Roxio is a spin-off company from Adaptec. All of the initial employees were Adaptec staff. So there are a large number of people who have been through the (soon to be) three different company names.

    What I want to know is whether Sonic was smart enough to grab the "Roxio" brand name along with the software?

    --
    [ReidNews]
  33. hail mary pass by theCat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    you know, throw/kick the ball as far as you can toward the goal and pray someone on your side makes a great play with it.

    "Calculated risk" is indeed a business model. Almost every business that isn't funded by a trust is based on risk of losses. It's not like they are shuttering the profitable business, they are cashing it out and throwing everything into what is obviously a make-or-break play. Maybe CD burners are boring. Maybe there are no great business opportunites left worth fighting over. Maybe someone is rich enough to want to play with some money.

    It isn't insane, it's just risky. I happen to think it is insanely risky, but that's just me. Still if I were sitting on a cool $80M with everything to lose and not much to gain I would give myself a nice salary, make a great try at stardom, and if it went down badly I'd buy an island in the South Pacific and retire to study beaches and waves.

    And how insane is that, really?

    --
    =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
  34. Re:Yes but Packetwriting software is crap by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Agreed, but I only used EZCD Creator to burn CDs or sessions. Never DirectCD. You are correct. DirectCD, does cause lots of issues on systems.

  35. CD burning already in WinXP by extra88 · · Score: 3, Informative

    What if Microsoft bundles a DVD/CD - burning program with LongHorn?

    Windows XP already has CD burning capability. Guess what? It's licensed Easy CD Creator code from Roxio. Check the Version info on C:\Program Files\Common Files\Adaptec Shared\CreateCD\CreateCD50.exe (the folder name is left over from when Adaptec owned Easy CD Creator).

  36. In other news "Metallica" become "The Napsters"... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...in deference to the 1970s US punk band, "The Ramones".

    James Napster, Kirk Napster and Robert Napster were all unavailable for comment at the time of going to press.

    Lars Napster was available for comment (as usual) but since no-one ever listens to the loudmouth twat drummer anyway, we didn't either.

    The band are about to embark on their "Going All Thrashy Again Was A Bad Career Move" World Tour 2004 to promote their new album "Yes, It Has Got A Black Cover Again But There Are A Few Ballads On It Honestly".

    Their latest single "Nothing Else Still Matters" reached number 98 of the US top 100 before finally giving up trying and going home.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  37. 3-minute MBA by Marge+N.+Lacoste · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here's Entrepreneurship 101: The successful entrepreneur turns a Risky Venture into a Cash Cow. She then sells the Cash Cow, when it has matured, to the professional manager. And starts a new Risky Venture. The difference between enterpreneurs (whom the /.ers envy) and professional managers (whom they scorn) is called management style. Most entrepreneurs have neither the patience nor the inclination to manage a mature company. Those who recognize this in themselves move on to bigger and better things. Examples of entrepreneurs: Steve Jobs, Michael Robertson, Wayne Huizenga.

  38. Re:News Flash by Nexum · · Score: 3, Insightful

    a small company however many ways you look at it

    I don't see a Fortune 500 (#236 I believe) as a small company in any way at all... how do you consider Apple Computer "small"?

    Apple is not spending their (now over $4.5bn) cash on the music business. THe iTMS is turning a (and I quote from the latest financial call) "a small profit".

    This is a service that was intended to just about break even, with the view to selling more iPods. So far, this service can only be called an unmitigated success in itself, and looking at the over $1bn of revenue that will come from the iPod in this year alone, the entire music division is doing incredibly.

    BOOM napster sneaks in with the same products and services but just a little cheaper and suddenly Apple goes chapter 11

    This is just ridiculous, maybe "sneak in with same products" is the best the Roxio management can come up with in place of a proper business plan, but no matter how many times you say "BOOM" it doesn't make it happen. You neglect to explain HOW on EARTH little Roxio/Napster can "sneak in" with the "same products" when Apple is a multi-billion dollar consumer product company and you can bet your granny that there are hoardes of extremely bright people over in Cupertino working on versions of the iPod that would make the current ones look like a 1980's walkman. What resources does Roxio/Napster have to compete with the resources that Apple both has and is willing to throw at this market?

    Plus there's the headstart factor, every day that goes by Apple cements itself into the lead, evey million songs that are sold is another million songs that will be played through Apple's iTunes software or Apple's iPod player cement cement cement goes Apple's foundation bulding machine. And on top of this no other service comes close to the integration and quality of the whole music service from Apple.

    So please, explain a little more about how Roxio/Napster, which has just become a totally profitless organisation is going to ensure that "suddenly Apple goes chapter 11"

    Sheesh.

    --

    This sig has been deprecated.
  39. Might not be such a bad move... by inkdesign · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some may not agree with this, but it seems to me a somewhat foresighted decision to sell their burning software division, as disk-burning is rapidly being incorporated into free venues, such as online music store software, winamp, etc.. Not to mention windows xp's disk-burning incorporated into the OS. I don't use it, but the masses do whatever happens when they pop in the blank disk. I can't imagine OEM's continuing to pay roxio to include their software either when they will have so many free alternatives, and I won't be surprised if the music stores take a proactive approach to getting their software included with cd burners. (If it isn't already, haven't bought one in a while)

  40. iceboxes to eskimos by Loge · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Selling iceboxes to eskimos is easy if you know anything about marketing. It's all in the positioning. Instead of iceboxes, you have to call them "bear-proof meat lockers".

    1. Re:iceboxes to eskimos by ron_ivi · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'd call them iceboxes.

      Right now it's 54 degrees in Nome AK, 64 degrees in Anchorage, 63 degrees in Fairbanks, 64 in Juneau, and even 46 degrees in Barrow (at the northern top of alaska).

      If they want something frozen right now, they need a freezer.

  41. You missed the point by methano · · Score: 2

    I don't know the numbers, but it all might make sense. Say that they might make a total profit of 80 million on their CD stuff after about 20 more years. My guess is that just about all computers ship with burners stuff already. So they cash out today and make enough money to retire, but they don't. They would get bored. So, they decide to try something new and exciting. They might even get to hang out with rock stars. Oh, what about the guy who just started in the code room and won't get rich? He obviously didn't get to take part in the decision. Everyone doesn't want to be Bill Gates, though most might like to try it for a little while.

  42. Might make sense in the long run by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I thought it had to be April Fools Day when I read the post, which to me sounded a bit like "Microsoft sells Office, Windows and Linux Bashing divisions to Apple, concentrates on PocketPC, TabletPC and FrontPage Express licensing."

    But on second thought, maybe this makes sense. Writing CDs and DVDs used to be slow and cumbersome. The operating systems didn't support it, so Roxio and other software filled a niche. These days more and more people own computers that can burn natively. The market for this software is likely to shrink, or at the very least become commoditized. Watch Longhorn get iTunes-like music burning support. The Easy CD Creator market is doomed, and perhaps Roxio decided that their best bet for growth is to copy Apple.

  43. $6 M / $80 M = 7.5% by Jonith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In order to maintain the income that the CD-Burning unit provided you would only have to make 7.5% off the $80M. I'd propose that there many less risky ways to see 7.5% off $80M then trying to maintaining the profitability of 2nd rate CD-Burning software. I don't think Roxio products will ever see another $80M in profit. I'd question whoever was willing to pay $80M for a company that only makes $6M profit / year. As for focusing on Napster, it's a recognized brand and the online music market is big now and is growing.

  44. My Prediction... by rainman_bc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As if we haven't seen enough :)

    eBay is to Yahoo Auctions
    as
    iTunes is to Napster

    First-Past-The-Post wins... And conversely market share wins.

    Ebay wins because it's the best place to go to get market value for your product. If you want to sell something, your best chance is eBay. More bidders = more sellers = even more bidders = even more sellers, etc etc...

    iTunes wins because it has the most consumers for the record labels. It has the purchasing power over the record labels, not Napster. iTunes can get the record companies to drool over their market share.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  45. Re:Talk about putting all your eggs in one basket. by multimed · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Let's say Napster needed $50m in cash in the next three months to be able to put together a plan to become a major contender in online music distribution networks. Maybe they need to pay $5m to each major label, get a huge server farm, whatever. They know what they need, but they don't have any capital. Selling the profitable division is a good business idea if through this change, Napster can become wildly profitable.

    I think most of the negative posters get this full well. We just happen to believe that the odds of Napster becoming even modestly profitable are somewhere between slim and none. $80 million is a drop in the bucket to much of their already established competition. Right now even the winners are at best just scraping by.

    --
    Vote Quimby.
  46. God damnit, that was hilarious. by LordPixie · · Score: 4, Funny

    A dozen question marks, four numbers, four parentheses, one ellipsis, and an exclamation point. Mathematically, such a joke really shouldn't have been that funny.


    --LordPixie

  47. Am I missing something? by geneing · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I thought that Apple has their online music business mainly to sell the iPods. They barely break even on the iTunes, but earn a healthy margin on the additional iPods they sell.

    Is Roxio planning to sell their own players? Otherwise their strategy doesn't make sense to me.

  48. When Nero ate Adaptecs Toast by CygnusXII · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The writing was on the wall, along time ago.
    Nero came out with a nicer and more functional product. Adaptec knew this was coming, and made the $$$ when the timing was right. Roxio thought a revamped GUI' and a bunch of unusable clutter, was what the consumer wanted and was wrong. Now the Chicken has come home to roost, and it has lain a big, old fat, egg... Adaptec had a good product @ EZCD v5 and from that point on, it was and still is crap. Nero added mpeg encoding, dvd utilities, audio burning and packet cd writing when EZCD was going through thier company change. Also o top it off they (ahead.de) made it simple to use...NERO didn't break windows operability in the process either. WindowsXP native drag and drop burning is a farce, and it only takes on use of NERO to discover that.
    I don't know if Nero makes a version for Apple Products, but I do know Nero is OEM Bundled, with just about every Burner I have purchased, and my friends as well. It's a shame that Roxio is hanging it's finacial Hopes, on the Napster Nail, and I am sure the Next thing we will be hearing is how they are a failing company and get sucked up by Symantec, or some other gobbling, IP Grabbing Pirahna left from the Bubble Popping.

    --
    My cat's picked up a Hammer. HEY! Put down that Hammer. Put Down that Hamm...THUNK!
  49. Twist to this whole deal by XO · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've read all 150+ comments on here so far, and have yet to see one thing noted:

    Part of the deal is they get a crap-load of stock in SonicBlue.

    SonicBlue has hardware/software out there in virtually every thing that reads/writes CDs/DVDs, as far as embedded systems go (like your home CD-Recorder or DVD-Recorder, and players, and such).

    Someone should google around for SonicBlue's profits, and see what type of a good thing it's going to be for them to still be making money off the stock part of SonicBlue, WHILE using this mega cash infusion to put some work into securing hopefully good stuff on the Napster side of things.

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  50. HOW THIS MAKES MONEY... by takochan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This one's easy... MBA 101..

    Here is how you make profit from this:

    Just you need to look at it the right way (this is serious)!

    What is important is NOT the financial health of the company, which will go bankrupt in 5 years (even the management knows this... but thats not what's important).

    Rather, they now have 80M in cash...

    Guess what that means!

    Massive exec salary and bonus time! (until you go through the 80M).

    Put a big hunk of the money in management salary trusts (happens all the time..that way the stockholders/creditors cannot get it when the company goes bust), and management gets rich.

    In 5 years, company goes bust, fire all the employees.

    Management takes $30M or $40M of it in 'exec compensation' over the 5 years... Retire in the Caymen Islands.

    Fuck the company... fuck the employees... who cares..we got rich!

    Happens all the time these days.. the new american way.

    (I kid you not..in 5 years, when we read the story on Roxio/Napster this is exactly how it will have played out...)