Slashdot Mirror


You've Got PC

freitasm writes "Geekzone is reporting on the AOL Optimized PC, a 2GHz Intel Celeron PC with 256MB RAM and 50GB ATA-100 HDD. It'll cost US$299.99 from Office Depot stores, with a commitment of 12-month AOL subscription. More information on AOL Optimized website." There's also a Reuters story.

71 of 362 comments (clear)

  1. basic... very basic. by ack154 · · Score: 5, Informative
    $299.99 + (12 months * $23.90/month) = $299.99 + $286.80 = enough to buy a decent PC without having to go with a full year of AOL (it also == $586.79 for those of you adding at home).

    Though I suppose it is actually on target, if someone only has $300 and can afford the $24/month payment, it might be a simple way to get a PC a little "cheaper" up front. Just too bad it has to be AOL.

    Full list of features:
    # Processor: Intel Celeron Processor 2 GHz
    # Operating System: Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition (pre-installed)
    # Memory: 256MB RAM
    # Hard Drive: 40GB, ATA 100, 5400 rpm
    # Optical Drive: 52x CD-ROM
    # Network: 10/100MB Ethernet
    # Modem: 56K v.92
    # Ports: Four USB 2.0 Ports (two front, two back)
    # Monitor: 17" CRT monitor (minimum 15.7" viewable)
    # Printer: Lexmark Color Inkjet Printer
    # Peripherals: Standard Multimedia Keyboard, Two-button Wheel Mouse, Speakers
    # Additional Pre-Installed Software: AOL Office suite of spreadsheet, word processing and presentation software; AOL 9.0 Optimized Internet service, the latest version of the AOL and AOL Latino services
    1. Re:basic... very basic. by Duncan3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Millions of people need SOME kind of dialup anyway.

      Now they can get what looks to me like a very good "mom and dad" PC for $300 WITH A MONITOR. No harm in that.

      Granted, other ISP's are cheaper.

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    2. Re:basic... very basic. by danamania · · Score: 5, Funny

      # Keyboard: with LOL, OMG, >_< and WTF keys

      Most important feature, that.

    3. Re:basic... very basic. by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're not just getting a PC, you're getting a PC and a 12-month dial-up service. If you're going to evaluate the real value of this deal then price up a similar spec PC and include a 12-month subscription to a ISP on par with AOL in terms of service, etc.

      Also, remember that this is the sort of deal that's put together specifically to attract novice PC users. People who've never owned a PC before can buy a machine and not have to worry about where to get an internet connection, etc: it's an all-under-one-roof solution that's perfect for people who know what they want to do (surf the internet, send email, type the odd letter) but have no idea about what to buy when they flick through a magazine or go to a superstore.

      In those terms, I don't see what there is to complain about.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    4. Re:basic... very basic. by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the main reason someone would buy a PC like this is to get on the web.

      You need a minimum of 256M, 2GHz CPU and 50G hdd just to get on the web?? Tell me, how much did you pay that Cray that can go on the web *and* do word processing as well (!!)?

      Sheesh, I don't what planet you live on. I use a P1-133 as a secondary computer just to go on the web in my electronics lab and browse technical PDFs.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    5. Re:basic... very basic. by c0dedude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Things Obviously Wrong:

      1. 256 MB. Chalk up an extra $50 to maintain sanity and upgrade to 512. AOL is a notorious memory hog.
      2. CDROM-What, no CD-R? No DVD? They're dirt cheap! Yet another thing for the owners of this pc to buy. Chalk up $75 for both.
      3. The printer. Ugh. I bought a Compaq a few years ago and it came with a 'free' lexmark color printer. The damn thing drinks ink. Then it throws it away. Then it gives it to special interests. Chalk up $100 for ink cartriges.
      4. Honestly, who doesn't use an optical mouse these days? That's more $$ right there when the wheel breaks down or clogs because AOLers don't know how to fix it.
      All in all, this is a lousy deal for which one could get a far better PC with far better internet for likely less money.

      --
      Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
    6. Re:basic... very basic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can get a shitty computer from Evil Satan for the same price, without the contract.

    7. Re:basic... very basic. by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you're going to evaluate the real value of this deal then price up a similar spec PC and include a 12-month subscription to a ISP on par with AOL in terms of service

      Yes okay, let's do that:

      AOL box:

      1 x piss-poor PC: $299
      1 x full year of AOL: $286.80
      = $586.79, as the parent poster kindly calculted

      Similar offering, not AOL:

      1 x piss-poor PC, but probably better than AOL's: $350
      1 x full year of any cheapo dialup ISP, but probably better than AOL: $180
      = $530.00

      So AOL worth an extra $56.79? I think not...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    8. Re:basic... very basic. by hal2814 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "a ISP on par with AOL in terms of service"

      Well, the $10 a month ISP my grandmother uses now is a lot better than AOL in terms of service. Do you know of any cheaper ISPs I can use with the abysmal service of AOL I can use for an accurate comparison?

      This sort of thing fizzled out in the past. Remember the big money off for agreeing to commitments to ISPs? I don't think this will help AOL any more than it helped MSN or CompuServe.

    9. Re:basic... very basic. by ack154 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right, but after the AOL payments, it's almost $600. You can easily get a PC with monitor under that right now. However, the only benefits are that you pay less up front, and get an ISP, but still...

    10. Re:basic... very basic. by ViolentGreen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nobody said anything about minimum requirements. Those are all low end "modern" parts.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    11. Re:basic... very basic. by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't use an optical mouse. There is nothing wrong with my ball mouse, and I know how to clean it.

    12. Re:basic... very basic. by bonkedproducer · · Score: 4, Informative

      My mother uses JOI internet for a whopping $6.95 a month and consistantly gets better connection speed, never a busy signal, better e-mail, and faster support and service than she ever got when she was an AOLer, so what is the point here?

      --
      Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence in society - M. Twain
    13. Re:basic... very basic. by dasmegabyte · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, but to put together a commercial computer -- meaning you can't use used parts, as there's no steady supply, and you need to use parts that will be in production for at least the next year for swapping out broken stuff -- it would cost the same to use those stats as to lower them.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    14. Re:basic... very basic. by seaniqua · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While you can get a better PC than that for under $600 right now, you miss out on one of the main reasons that the "great unwashed" are buying these PC's to begin with: internet. One of the main reasons for a family that doesn't already own a PC to get one is because internet access is becoming more and more of a convenience/necessity of life.

      In an inexperienced user/internet-only situation, this looks to be a good solution. You can buy another PC for a similar price, but then you would have to add ISP charges on top of that. Plus, AOL is a name recognized by the public, which means that Grandma and Grandpa will trust them more.

      --
      That's right, I read at +2 and post at +1. Not even I care what I have to say.
    15. Re:basic... very basic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh. You mean the system is very basic. Sorry - thought you meant the user.

    16. Re:basic... very basic. by Tongo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is the target audience is not likely to know about these services. Most people that would buy a PC like this barely know what "online" means let alone what an ISP or GMail is. They just want to go to a superstore and get someone to show em what they need to get online with the least amount of hassle. I serisously doubt someone who buys one of these would even have to set up a dialup account.

    17. Re:basic... very basic. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The thing is that AOL has the marketing. Whether or not a geek thinks it is "worth" it is irrelevant. A lot of people may buy this, and they may all regret it, or they may not. Geeks simply can't compete against AOL.

      There are geeks that are willing to assemble or refurb a better computer for less, but they simply can't get the word out, even locally.

      Frankly, I really don't care to "spread the workd" because I don't get paid to do that. If I do get paid to do that, then I am likely selling something. Unfortunately, a lot of people see AOL as the cuddly giant and the local geek as a distasteful character.

    18. Re:basic... very basic. by tobar+mersa · · Score: 2, Funny
      You need a minimum of 256M, 2GHz CPU and 50G hdd just to get on the web??
      No, that's simply to run Windows
      --
      This sig space intentionally left blank.
  2. ....and? by Megaweapon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No offense or anything, but why is this on the front page?

    --
    I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
    1. Re:....and? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because michael's an idiot?

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  3. Wasn't this tried already? by Hanna's+Goblin+Toys · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As I recall we all got the system, cancelled the contract and hacked the P.C. Sounds like this time we do the same thing, but we don't have to hack it.

    Any ideas on how to make their contract unenforcable? I'm thinking pseudonym + PO Box personally.

  4. 'cuz it's worked so well in the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Haven't we seen this done at least three times in the past? And hasn't it always been pay cash, give false info, walk away?
    It's not a damn cell phone you idjits.

    1. Re:'cuz it's worked so well in the past by John+Bodin · · Score: 3, Informative

      The system is not stocked in store but will be shipped to what ever address you give them at the time you sign up for the AOL service. Which is done in the store.

      --
      John
  5. $299.99! by T-Keith · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why don't they send them in the mail for free like the CDs. Seems like a marketing strategy change to me.

    1. Re:$299.99! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      ACTUALLY THEY ARE I JUST G0T 0NE BUT IT SEEMS T0 BE MISSING THE CAPS L0CK KEY AND ALL PUNCTUATION KEYS

  6. welcome to commoditisation by Ubergrendle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    $299 for a PC, heavily subsidised by an AOL subscription.

    This is like a cellphone plan being applied to home PCs.

    I wonder how much of that $299 is for the Windows license? This is linux's opportunity in my mind...if PCs become throw-away items (e.g. equal to or less value than a console system) at what point do the corporate masters figure 30-40% of your capital costs going to Microsoft doesn't make much sense?

    --
    John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    1. Re:welcome to commoditisation by TheRiddler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      AOL users are not linux's opportunity.

    2. Re:welcome to commoditisation by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 2, Informative

      I wonder how much of that $299 is for the Windows license?

      60$ is the OEM price (per each) for a small distributor (couple thousand PCs) I have no idea what AOLs price point would be but 40-50$ sounds like a good guess.

  7. 50 GB hard drive to run AOL? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I know that their connection software is bloatware- but isn't this a bit on the ridiculous side? Then again- it's been a while since I priced hard drives- perhaps the 10GB models are no longer available?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  8. Entry level and AOL Office == Open Office? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    $299 gives you an entry level PC. Looks like its enough to surf the web with and do most day to day stuff. Surprised by the lack of DVD drive, but maybe they figure that most people are interested in download and burn? Certainly not something for Doom 3, but then again I'm not surprised. You also need to be subscribed to AOL for one year. This really sounds like a similar approach as that used for mobile phones.

    Reading the FAQ, I see mention of 'AOL Office Writer', 'AOL Office Calc' and 'AOL Office Impres'. Searching the net reveals nothing on the programs, though the closest I could find were matching names in the Open Office suite. Other than the names I wonder if they are one and the same?

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    1. Re:Entry level and AOL Office == Open Office? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you go to the FAQ on the aol page it tells you that it is an office product from sun microsystems, so they obviously liscensed staroffice, and put their name on it.

    2. Re:Entry level and AOL Office == Open Office? by 5amTheButcher · · Score: 2, Informative
      Here's the full excerpt - seems to be StarOffice:
      What software is included with the system?
      Along with AOL 9.0 Optimized, the system comes with AOL Office, powered by Sun.

      What is AOL Office, powered by Sun?
      This is a full suite of productivity tools that can open, edit and save documents in a variety of formats, including Microsoft® Office. AOL Office contains four main applications: AOL Office Writer (for text documents), AOL Office Calc (for spreadsheets), AOL Office Impress (for presentations) and AOL Office Draw graphics).

      What is AOL Office Writer?
      AOL Office Writer is a word processing program that helps you create many types of documents such as reports, greeting cards, letters and more.

      What is AOL Office Calc?
      AOL Office Calc is a spreadsheet application that you can use to organize and manipulate data that contains numbers, such as a household budget.

      What is AOL Office Impress?
      AOL Office Impress provides tools to help you create attractive presentations and slide shows. You can use Impress to show presentations on your computer or print them out.

      What is AOL Office Draw?
      AOL Office Draw lets you create simple and complex drawings. You can also insert tables, charts, formulas and other items created in AOL Office programs into your drawings.
      AOL pushing free office software... I wonder if they are providing tech support for it as well. You could buy one AOL OPTIMIZED PC for the office, install StarOffice on all the computers, and then abuse AOL Tech support for all your MS -> Sun compatibility problems...
  9. why, oh why? by __aaitqo8496 · · Score: 2, Funny

    For the love of Christ, that's all we need is more ignorant AOL users on slow dialup connections. Frankly, I'm quite surprised that AOL hasn't gone the way of many other services (Prodigy, MSN, etc.) that abandoned their proprietary software for simple internet access.

    Maybe if they encouraged use of standard Internet, the IQ of the average netizen wouldn't decrease every time AOL signed up a new user. It's a real problem when users call tech support because they can't get to a website because they type the domain in the AOL search bar instead of an internet browser. *sigh*

  10. Antithesis by nlawalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here it is, the exact antithesis of the Linux vs. Windows story about a half hour ago, and the reason that "Linux vs. Windows" is not a reality yet. Plug it in, turn it on, and you're on (a poor imitation of) the Internet.

  11. Looks Like Open Office Is The Default Office Suite by cbowland · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the article: "The AOL Optimized PC also comes bundled with the AOL Office suite, a version supplied by Sun. This suite of productivity applications consists of: AOL Office Writer, AOL Office Calc and AOL Office Impress." This is a nice step for Open Office in terms of exposure to Windows users.

    --

    Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.
    Teach him to eat and he will fish forever.

  12. MS Tried This Before Through Best Buy by geomon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And other outlets. You bought a rock-bottom priced PC and you were obliged to use MSN for 3 years.

    After calculating the high cost of MSN service versus using a local ISP, you could have spent the difference in the contract price and bought yourself a really nice PC.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  13. Great! by GP · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does it come pre-loaded with spam? Because if not, no sale, bucko.

  14. DO NOT PAY FOR INTERNET SERVICE! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 4, Funny

    As Confucious Say:

    If you pay for month of AOL, you give yourself net access for month.

    If you buy neighbor cheap wireless linksys router and offer free setup, putting your MAC on it and retaining usr/pwd, you give yourself net access for life.

  15. Services cost more than hardware by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 4, Insightful
    So. We've reached the point where the software is increasingly becoming free (beer and freedom), and now the hardware is increasingly becoming so cheap that it becomes the after thought in a transaction. The services part of this deal (12 months of AOL) is "worth" just about as much as the cost of that PC.

    Free software. Almost "free" hardware (throw-ins to a deal). Free wireless access. How long before we see ubiqituous computing? I guess the bigger question is how long before we see a PC included in a cereal box instead of those DVDs I've seen advertised on the boxes of Fruit Loops (or whatever it was)? "Hey! Check it out! This box contains a coupon for a free PC! (just send in 20 box tops, plus $39.95 shipping and handling)"

  16. Re:coincidence? by Mateito · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Buy now, pay later.

    If its not coming out of your pocket today, its cheaper.

    People don't think long-term when making purchases. That's why banks can sell consumer credit at high interest rates with low repayments over rediculously long times.

    People joke about "Wogs and Cash", but the concept of never going into debt for a non-incoming generating purchase has a lot going for it.

  17. Re:The Racial Target by Rie+Beam · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The computers will come configured with a simple desktop with large icons that send users to specific areas of the AOL service or applications loaded on the computer. They can also be preconfigured for Spanish language speakers."

    Say it. You know you want to. You know it's coming. The best case mods. Ever.

  18. System needs to be designed better by abkaiser · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Regarding the 256MB of RAM...

    I still can't figure out why today's PCs are still shipping with 256MB as the standard. Windows XP behaves much worse with 256MB versus something like 512MB.

    It's like when I purchased my car a few years ago. With like 1000 miles on it, it handled horribly in snow and bad weather. I thought the car was designed poorly, until I realized it was the tires. I had a very important part of the package slowing everything down.

    My point: Who cares if it's a 2gHz CPU? With 256MB you'll be paging to that 5400RPM drive too much to notice the benefit.

  19. Aren't those terms mutually exclusive? by ryanvm · · Score: 4, Funny

    AOL Optimized? Oh shit - the peg just broke off on my cognitive dissonance meter.

    1. Re:Aren't those terms mutually exclusive? by g00z · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's even funnier than you think.

      For those that aren't aware, this whole "optimized" craze is a reference to something real evil that AOL has been doing for years: having dial up users connect to proxy servers that compress the living fuck out of any image requested from a web page.

      Sound like a good idea, no? Make all the images smaller in size so pages load faster. As a friend of mine put it, "Doesn't AOL realize that people like to look at porn?"

      If it was some light compression it would be one thing, but images look like something my cat hacks up on the floor after getting in the garbage once AOL "optimizes" them.

      --
      "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
  20. Reminds me of the old Q-Link trick by g00z · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not that there is anything new to the whole "Get a serious discount on hardware if you get a subscription to [fill in blank] online service", but for some reason this one is interesting coming from AOL, since back when they we're Quantum Link (The old commodore 64 online service back in the 80's) they did a similar thing.

    Back in the Q-link days, not to many folks had modems or could really afford them, so Q-link's hook to get you to sign up with them was that they would offer you a heavily discounted 300 baud modem when you signed up for Q-link. This seems like a no brainier these days, but back then it was really something because most online services like Playnet, GEnie, Compuserve, etc all charged you a setup fee AND charged you like $30 for their software.

    So, like I said, not that this is new, it's REALLY not new for AOL.

    Man do I ever still pine for the days of Q-link and Club Carribe.

    --
    "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
  21. Fallout by Nuttles · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The fallout from this offer may very well be the annoyance of techies everywhere. If the target audience are the people who have yet to buy a home computer then a lot of those people will be pretty much clueless with it. So it will follow in a lot of cases, these people will download or otherwise get viruses galore and/or adware. Since these new people only spent what was it 299 on a new computer, they aren't going to want to pay some tech 60 bucks an hour to fix their computer. Their tech friends will be used and abused. We will be called in to fix their problems. If the problem is software and we fix it for free than all is right with the world. The fallback on fixing a computer once is that forever more that person can say that, I think what you did 6 years ago is screwing up my computer now. Also, there is a hardware issue. These computers have the cheapest possible hardware, parts are going to die in them a lot. Well, back to the poor techie that got stuck fixing there computer. If you find out that lets say their harddrive is pooched, then they will ask how much it will cost. You will tell them and they will give you the look, like I told them that they have to hand over a years salary to fix it, then they will say well, could it be this or is there a way I can get by not using this right now...I can go on

    So my assertion is cheap PCs are only a headache for techies. Any techie who finds out that someone has one of these type of computers, run run away, very fast even

    Nuttles
    Christian and proud of it

    1. Re:Fallout by JudgeFurious · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I long ago quit trying to help those who didn't have a clue. It's cold I know but what Nuttles wrote sounds so much like what I went through back in the late 90's that I'm convinced it's the only way to go. I've pretty much wittled it down to just family members (Who I've mostly pushed to Macs so that's no big deal) but I won't touch anyone elses computer. Not for the classic "Buy you lunch sometime", not for money, not for anything.

      My last one was in 2000 and it was a simple come over, install Windows ME (Ugh) and walk away. I spent almost a year coming over off and on to fix minor things and then I said "That's it, I'm done".

      Lost a "friend" (think "friendly leech") but gained my freedom. Now I say "You should get a Mac" and leave it at that.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    2. Re:Fallout by Electrum · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've been asked before why I think people have no big issue paying an auto mechanic a labor rate of $85/hr. - but moan/groan about even $50/hr. for a PC. Well, imagine if new cars sold for under $1000 each.....

      If new cars sold for under $1000, then you wouldn't have to pay a mechanic $85/hr. Why not just buy a new computer when it breaks?

      Because cars aren't like computers. The value of a car is the car. The majority of the value of a computer is the data on the computer, not the computer itself.

  22. Buy whatever's cheap by rdunnell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The manufacturers probably aren't making too many 10GB drives these days. So, you get a bulk lot of what's cheapest which is probably somewhere in the 30 to 60 gig range these days for a cheap IDE 3.5" hard drive.

  23. Dear God, Why? by TheSpoom · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is it just me or does this seem equivalent to signing away your soul to Satan?

    I do tech support for HP. AOL uses their own drivers to connect to their network, and also block off the Properties page of their connection. Thus, we cannot enable the Windows XP firewall, so God help someone who hasn't patched their machine (luckily I can get around this by installing Norton Personal Firewall, which is usually included with our machines). I've also heard that if you want, AOL will sell you a firewall for $3 extra a month or something. So to sum up: Block free included product, sell own (probably inferior) product.

    Not to mention that AFAIK their entire technical support division is stationed in India, and I think they have a 3 minute call length limit or something. Whenever people call me and say they were referred to us by AOL, I roll my eyes and ask what AOL actually did before referring them to us. 90% of the time, they did NOTHING. They didn't have them click on anything, they didn't check any settings, and they most certainly did not reinstall their own software. "It's a problem with the modem." "It's a problem with the computer." I've actually heard from customers where they had to hand up on the AOL tech because they didn't take the referral to us and he actually started yelling at the customer! And this service is worth $20+ a month?! God help the person who buys this PC and is RELEGATED to these people...

    Please, if you use AOL, consider switching to another provider. You're worth more than what they give you.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:Dear God, Why? by g00z · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Here is an interesting account of why AOL uses such truely BIZARE drivers to connect to the network (among other weird AOL things) that I found on usenet a while back while doing research into only playnet software:

      Brian Heyboer writes:

      >I can't tell you for sure, but I suspect they are afraid it will give
      >away some of their security systems that are also used in the AOL
      >software. Remember, there was a lot more on the Q-Link end than just
      >the interface for the users. There was also their entire billing and
      >password security system. There was also a "back door" of sorts where
      >Q-Link menus and what-not could be updated via AOL.

      AOL is in fact largely based on rewritten QLink (nee PlayNet)
      code. Many of the algorithms are unchanged.

      >Another possibility is that they cannot rather than will not. Q-Link
      >licensed the software from Playnet and acquired the rights to it only
      >after winning a lawsuit against the receiver of the bankrupt Playnet.
      >They never did get all the source code and documentation the lawsuit
      >gave them the rights to. So, they may not be able to either because the
      >terms of the judgement don't allow it or they simply don't have it all.

      In fact, they may not have the right to resell the technology;
      it depends on what rights they got. (I suspect they eventually got all the
      rights, though.)

      They did, however, have all the source code and documentation
      for the PlayNet system, at least as it was when they licensed it (we made
      a number of mods later to PlayNet, some of which were activated and some
      never were). I spent a number of days down there training various
      programmers there on the design. One thing added after QLink (now AOL)
      licensed PlayNet was a quite complete auditorium/panel/etc setup with
      queuing, moderators, etc, run entirely via online messages (no client
      software change required). This was complete and tested and finished
      the week before PlayNet declared bankruptcy, so no one ever actually used
      it. There were other things too, but I remember that because I was working
      on it as PlayNet went under. Of course, they made their own mods
      (initially mostly cosmetic, but they added lots of stuff later).

      As must be obvious, I was one of the main (and last) programmers at
      PlayNet. It's _really_ amusing to look at AOL today and say "I know why
      users are limited to 10-character names.", and see many other elements of
      the original PlayNet design unchanged (even though the reason for them is
      LONG gone). For example, the 10-character name limit was largely based on
      how many screen names we could display in the room header in chat within
      4(?) 40-character lines on a C64 screen. Ditto the screen-name defaults (I
      remember us sitting around BS'ing about how we'd handle that, and conflicts
      - so now you have JoeS12345.) Online messages and how they popped up were
      another Playnet idea (remember, the next-most-sophisticated system at the
      time was Compuserve's ASCII "CB". Much has changed in AOL, of course, but
      it's kind-of heartening to see just how well a design from 1984-85 for 64K
      6502-based machines has held up over the years, at least in the broad
      strokes.

      The system (PlayNet and QLink) was actually quite sophisticated.
      It was run by programs written in a multi-tasking state-machine language.
      (Yes, your C64 was multi-tasking when doing this - N state-machine tasks
      plus the "main" (basic/etc) task, which ran the game or whatever if needed.
      Things like Online messages caused a new task to be started.) The
      communications protocol was designed (by me) to error-correct the X.25
      padmodem link, obey a limit on packet size (128?), and minimize the
      number of packets (since we were charged both by the hour and the packet
      back then). It used CRC error-checking (yes, in a C64), asymmetric
      sliding-windows, piggybacked-acks, selective retransmit

      --
      "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
  24. AOL Optimized PC? by gotem · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if the keyboard will default to Caps Lock turned on

  25. Random semi-on-topic AOL rant.. by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Informative

    My Casio PDA had a large AOL setup program built into the ROM. Even in the unlikely event that i would have needed it i would only have ever used it once! Bloody idiots wasted all that space instead of including some useful software.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  26. Re:Enforcement method? by Stevyn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, but you also get internet service. That is at least $120 a year if you count the cheapest provider. These PC's aren't geared for anyone who frequents this site. This idea was meant for people who don't have a PC and can't afford to drop $600 on one. Instead, like cell phones, you pay over time. Yeah, eventually they'll end up paying more, but that's the same with any contract of this type that extends to many other businesses.

  27. Cut-throat? Don't be so sure by Rie+Beam · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sure, AOL sucks. But the target range here isn't the Linux geek with the 3MB/Sec connection. Like it was stated in the article, the target consists of A) retirees, but B) mostly minority and minimum-wage groups. In this case, they'll be happy just to have a connection - since they'll be paying for it anyway (if it didn't ship with AOL for a year, they'd still have to get a connection somehow), this really is a good deal for them.

  28. Re:Monitor and printer. by kayak334 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Yeah, I just priced the equivalent on pricewatch

    Celeron 2.0: $60
    256MB DDR: $33
    40GB HDD: $31
    52x CD-ROM: $10
    Lexmark Printer: $29
    17" CRT: $74

    Total: $237

    Note that total doesn't include XP license or a 1 year warrenty. You make a good point about people spending the money on an internet connection anyway, but if this is their 2nd PC and they are just connecting it to an existing network, it becomes much cheaper without AOL involved.
  29. Re: your Sig. by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Informative

    This has been discussed. It's not some conspiracy theory or sneaky DNS redirect.

    If you type in a non-valid URL, Firefox automagically does a "I'm feeling lucky" search on what you typed. The first result comes back microsoft.com, for whatever reason.

    Verify this yourself by typing the same thing into google and hitting search/lucky.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  30. I'm scared... by Fantasio · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You'll notice that the configuration does not include any firewall or any anti-virus .... and the targeted customer will be the most vulnerable. Be prepared for an AOL army of spamming zombies

  31. Wal-Mart Linspire / Lycoris anyone by rainman_bc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Aren't the Wal-Mart PC's the same price without the dial-up commitment?

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  32. Theres no any any key! by essreenim · · Score: 4, Funny

    Also, on the bottom left the 'ANY KEY' key,
    and 'EJECT CUP HOLDER' key.

  33. This article seems to indicate... by donnyspi · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ...that these PCs are only for minorities and poor people. What's up with that?

    http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=7 38&e=1&u=/nm/20040812/tc_nm/media_aol_dc

  34. It's been done by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 3, Informative
    # Keyboard: with LOL, OMG, >_< and WTF keys

    Most important feature, that.

    It's been done. Not only that it's been patented. :o)

    US Patent 6,629,793 The Emoticon Keyboard

  35. For Comparison by krgallagher · · Score: 2, Informative
    This is the cut rate system from Walmart.

    Hardware details: * AMD Athlon 2000 Processor * 128 MB DDR RAM * Expandable up to 1 GB RAM * 40 GB hard drive * Includes keyboard, mouse, stereo speakers and Ethernet interface (does not include monitor) * Supports onboard AMD Duron processor * Supports 200 MHz front-side bus * Supports integrated 256 MB SDRAM onboard * Shared memory architecture allows a maximum of 64 MB main memory to act as frame buffer * Linare PC comes with the following types of support: phone, e-mail and web * Includes a 1-year warranty return to manufacturer * Model AD2000 * Supports high resolutions up to 1920 x 1440 Software details: * Linare Linux * Linux-based operating system * KDE: powerful graphical desktop environment * OpenOffice Office Suite * Mozilla browser * Mozilla e-mail

    --

    Insert Generic Sig Here:

  36. Re:At 299, I have to wonder... by Obiwan+Kenobi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ugh. This is a nice and clueless comment. Why? Because AOL PCs are for people who want games (first on the list, look at the sales for Deer Hunter), email, games, a few office programs, and web games.

    If you've met the type of AOL user I'm used to, the kind that download anything they can find from AOL games and/or PopCap, including whatever ridiculous games that are included in email attachments, which include viruses, you know that Linux is not an option here.

    This is a post that gets moderated high because it praises Linux. But in the real world, the world that I live in and have to support anything from clueless users to family members, Linux is nowhere near an option for AOL users.

    I love Linux, but built for AOL-ers it is not (at this point).

  37. This is not a crappy computer by MobyDisk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Half the posts are saying "Who cares? It's an entry-level $299 computer." Someone please tell me why a normal computer user (the type who uses AOL) needs anything faster than a 2GHz Celeron with 256MB of RAM?

    Word Processing? check.
    Web surfing? check.
    Email? check.
    Office applications? check.
    Solitaire? check.
    All of the above simultaneously? check.
    Doom 3? Oops!

    Other than video games, a typical "entry-level" PC like this does fine. This is the same thing as Microsoft having trouble getting people off of Windows '9x.

    The Mah & Pah with a 500Mhz PII doesn't need anything faster. Their broadband is still slower than the speed that their PC can render a web page. It still plays chess better than they do. And they don't notice the few seconds of paging when the switch apps.

  38. I like this idea. by shadowcabbit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Honestly. I have broadband at home, but my primary computer is a laptop right now. I've been looking into getting a new machine to customize for gaming, and this might just be the best plan for me. Why, you may ask?

    AOL.

    I used it for my ISP for a month while I was unemployed (about the only time I was ever thankful for a free disc in the mail) and found it to be usable, if not the most pleasant experience.

    I travel quite a bit between a couple relatives' houses which don't have persistent net connections. If the contract does not require me to use AOL as the ISP on the cheap machine, or if it will accept "AOL for Broadband" (which I will never use), I'll gladly sign up once I get some extra cash, then begin loading good components in there. The dial-up will be a good backup for the laptop.

    Of course, that's just me, and I'm crazy. Sure, there are better alternatives, but in my situation, this looks pretty tempting.

    --
    "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
  39. Basic and slow by AShuvalov · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Practically no modern game will play on this "machine". You get a web browser, mp3 player and a text editor with printer, that's pretty much it. Garbage from my point of view.

    If you need something as close to ground as this, consider Ebay. Recently I purchased a very decent a nice-looking HP's IPAQ PC for $35:

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ca te gory=51109&item=5115338678&rd=1

    like this one.

    The config like the one this AOL ad has will cost you around $100-$150 on Ebay.

    --
    Andrew
  40. Actual Cost.... by jdragan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, the PC is $299, the service is $23.90. Looks like AOL is picking up the rest of the actual cost of the machine by charging a high price for dial-up. Pretty soon, they are going to want to recoup the cost by raising the dial-up rates by $1.00 - $1.50. That is a lot of money considering how many AOL idiots there are out there...

  41. I'll tell you why. by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For the love of Christ, that's all we need is more ignorant AOL users on slow dialup connections.

    I'll agree that ignoranmce can caus eproblems, but why do *you* care if they are on slow connections? Unless you just want to email huge attachments to everyone you know, or hijack their comupters. The majority of people I know (and I'm a big dog geek in a town full of geeks, but I know lots of folks all over) are still on dialup.

    Frankly, I'm quite surprised that AOL hasn't gone the way of many other services (Prodigy, MSN, etc.) that abandoned their proprietary software for simple internet access.

    Since they're hugely successful, that would be stupid. They would need a compelling case to change over. And a lot of people are *happy* with AOL. AOL works just fine for the teeming masses. Do I wish it were better than it is? Of course. But their users are happy, and keep sending them money. So why should they change?

  42. They really ARE targetting Latino users. by jasonla · · Score: 2

    The LA Times carried a story with more emphasis on the ethnic/cultural angle, saying AOL is specifically targetting Latino users/families who do not already have a computer in the home in order to build their subscriber base.

    http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-aol12aug12,1 ,3576783.story?coll=la-home-business