NASA Boosts AI For Planetary Rovers
transcendent writes "According to Space Daily, NASA is working on increasing the ability of future rover's AI. From the article: 'It now takes the human-robot teams on two worlds several days to achieve each of many individual objectives... A robot equipped with AI, on the other hand, could make an evaluation on the spot, achieve its mission faster and explore more'. Sounds like a good idea, but the article continues, 'Today's technology can make a rover as smart as a cockroach, but the problem is it's an unproven technology'. Another article about autonomous rovers being developed by Carnegie Mellon University is here."
Radio contact broken when the rover hides under a rock...
'It now takes the human-robot teams on two worlds several days to achieve each of many individual objectives... A robot equipped with AI, on the other hand, could make an evaluation on the spot, achieve its mission faster and kill off the remaining crew members with higher efficiency.'
-- "I'm not a religious man, but if you're up there, save me Superman..."
That's great! If they could make those rovers as fertile as cockroaches, too, we could have the entire surface of Mars covered in no time!
Of course these robots must obey the three laws!
Now, if only they can make it as death-resistant as cockroaches that would be something..
.
I said that with a straight face.
I can't move the muscles in my face anyway.
Logic, macros, and more
Because a rover on mars has about the same chance of reproducing as an average /.'er?
So the only thing left after the next Big Bang will be Rovers? When I flip on the kitchen light, will little mechanical eyes blink and then instantly stainless steel wheels spin/clatter across the floor?
Do we REALLY want AI running around on Mars without any way to control it?
AI : Must look at rock, rock looks boring... oohh shiney metal UFO lemme go play with it.
NASA : Bob R2-D2 please return to your mission
AI : No, rocks suck. You can't do anything to me so I'm not going to listen to you.
Give it a couple of weeks, a railgun, maybe a rocket launcher and then it's like playing space invaders but in reverse every time we try to land on Mars.
I like muppets.
... nothing is naturally that stupid.
They have trouble with proven technology like calculators.
1 inch = 2.54 cm
"Because a rover on mars has about the same chance of reproducing as an average
Hey now, that kind of generalized bashing is totally uncalled for... the Mars rover has a much better chance.
... and given some of the posts/comments...
Isn't all that is really needed just a landing of a main transmitter/receiver along with what amounts to a bunch of ant or roach like robots that go out in various directions and transmit back to the main transmitter that relays it back to NASA?
To increase the overall data collection.
Looking for signs of life on mars.... hummm... that could pose a problem, if the small robots see eash other.
Oh hell screw it, lets put life there, wouldn't that just solve the quest for life on mars?
To my knowledge, cockroaches are easy to get close to and step on.
...
I have empirical evidence which is different from that. A good trick, though, is to have a 'honeypot' shoe on the floor where they will hide and then
CC.
TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
... just in case it bumps on Beagle 2
This is my sig. There are thousands more, but this one is mine.
Very useful, if only for the hunter-seeker algorithm.
I hadn't realised that robots had got that good yet.
Still, I for one...
Xenu loves you!
Guess what? A neural network is a simple nonlinear function. Period.
And the brain is just a little harder nonlinear function. Period.