Slashdot Mirror


Apple Patents 'Chameleon' Computer Case

Dave B writes "The Register has been fishing at the patent office again and found that Apple has a new patent for "a computing device [which] includes a housing having an illuminable portion. The computing device also includes a light device disposed inside the housing. The light device is configured to illuminate the illuminable portion". While this gives us the exciting prospect of an iMac that is all five fruit flavors at once surely the original iMac with its glowing power button, or indeed a-thousand-and-one other electronic gizmos represent prior art?" Update a couple of users noticed this Slashdot Story from 2002 which looks familiar.

21 of 323 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Picard by llamalicious · · Score: 5, Funny

    There ...

    are

    four LIGHTS!!!!!!!!!

  2. Re:Well... by MoonFog · · Score: 4, Funny

    It certainly is a patent issue

    The term prior art is mainly used in the patent field.

  3. Hum... by SirLestat · · Score: 3, Funny

    I guess it now make sense to call them iLamps ! Damn it was my favorite joke.

  4. Again, infringing on my well known patents by BubbaThePirate · · Score: 4, Funny
    I've already patented the concept, and actualisation of 'housing having an illuminable portion...[which] also includes a light device disposed inside the housing.'. I call it a House with a Light Bulb(tm).

    Gimme my 699$ or suffer the litigatious consequnceses.

    --

    -- "I'm not a religious man, but if you're up there, save me Superman..."

  5. Re:Are patents stifling or restricting? by krog · · Score: 5, Funny

    Good thing no one has a patent on hyperbole -- you'd be in some serious trouble with the above post.

  6. Chameleon Computer Case by The+Subliminal+Kid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just what I need a computer that hides from me by becoming the same colour as the desk.

  7. Re:Not Prior Art by ari_j · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not to mention that Apple would really have to smoke some bad crack to claim prior art against their own patent.

  8. Re:Prior Art? by ari_j · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wait - computers don't actually do that? I guess I'm going to have to re-watch all those movies that I learned about computers from.

  9. Re:Prior Art? by krog · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is obviously the first hack anyone is going to write for it. The color and pattern is software-controlled, and therefore application-agnostic.

    Second, someone (it could be me) will figure out how to goatse your case.

  10. shoot your eye out by millahtime · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't know about "Lasers". You might open the case and shoot your eye out.

  11. Re:Interactive Illumination by Rie+Beam · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, and if someone gets Goatse'd, a little fluorescent man holding his anus pops up on the case.

  12. Re:Prior Art? by FatalTourist · · Score: 5, Funny

    And more importantly: STOP dropping acid!

    --


    Escape Pod Films: Sketch Comedy and Web Series
  13. Re:Not Prior Art by hype7 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Not to mention that Apple would really have to smoke some bad crack to claim prior art against their own patent.


    How do you think you come up with a patent for a colour changing "chameleon" computer case?

    -- james
  14. Re:Interactive Illumination by N+Monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    It looks like Apple is extending the "illuminated case" theme by making it more interactive. The patent is purposely vague about what the illumination is, taking (what seems to be) pains to avoid calling the illumination static. I think they're looking at displaying color bars, logos, icons, etc. on the case from the inside. It would be cool to see an entire case shaded (for example) from blue to red to indicate processor activity. Imagine a rack full of server systems with that capability, in a dark server room....

    I wonder what will happen if it ever works out that it can behave like a chameleon and then it suddenly disappears....?

  15. ACHTUNG! by StoatBringer · · Score: 3, Funny

    ACHTUNG! Alles touristen und non-technischen peepers!

    Das machine control is nicht fur gerfinger-poken und mittengrabben. Oderwise is easy schnappen der springenwerk, blowen fuse, und poppencorken mit spitzensparken.

    Der machine is diggen by experten only. Is nicht fur geverken by das dummkopfen. Das rubbernecken sightseenen keepen das cotten picken hands in das pockets, so relaxen und watchen das blinkenlights.

    --
    Cress, cress, lovely lovely cress
  16. Re:Prior Art? by Pitdog7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think the Mood Stone guy is gonna have a little something to say about this...

    --

    "If my answers frighten you, then you should cease asking scary questions." -Jules Winnfield
  17. Re:Prior Art? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Instead of the Blue Screen Of Death, you now get a Blue Case Of Death?

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  18. Re:Interactive Illumination by ttrafford · · Score: 3, Funny
    I wonder what will happen if it ever works out that it can behave like a chameleon and then it suddenly disappears....?
    Yeah, don't bother- chances are your boss won't fall for that one either.
  19. Re:Prior Art? by pimpinmonk · · Score: 4, Funny

    UV? Is that for tanning purposes? Lord knows geeks need it more than anyone else...

  20. Re:This IS news! by ttrafford · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ahhh! Slashdot is being invaded by Multics users!

  21. Re:Prior Art? by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Funny

    Heh, your entire case will turn into the swirling beach ball of doom!!

    (yes, I know it's not quite analogous to the BSOD)

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz