Slashdot Mirror


Anti-Phishing Tools

mikeage writes "PCWorld has an article about an anti-phishing tool available that tries to detect fake websites." This is about Web Caller-ID already in use by eBay's custom user toolbar. The article also talks a bit about the incredible increase in phishing scams.

27 of 233 comments (clear)

  1. Huh by Lord+Grey · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Unless I missed something, neither the article nor the summary provides a link to the product. Here is what I found: Web Caller-ID. That link contains this paragraph:
    Web Caller-ID's detection engine includes hundreds of routines that examine the elements of a web site, ranging from the site's content and links to its page history, and then determine if they are indicative of a spoof. For example, the URL of a particular site might be analyzed for phishing characteristics, such as the inclusion of an IP address at the beginning of the URL, or the source code might be analyzed for calls to a different web site. In production environments, Web Caller-ID consistently detects more than 98% of previously unknown spoof sites using behavioral technology.
    This product sounds interesting at first blush, but don't most phishing scams begin with an email? Web sites that support phishing aren't going to have as many of these charactistics as the email that lured the victims there to begin with. I have to wonder just how well this really works, despite the, "consistently detects more than 98% of previously unknown spoof sites" quote.
    --
    // Beyond Here Lie Dragons
    1. Re:Huh by beh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is, of course, another issue as well - if you eliminate 98% of the phish scams - that'll probably also mean that people will start paying less attention to the problem at hand and might hence become less careful about those phish scams that DO make it into their inbox.

      This might be in a way comparable to the rates of HIV/AIDS spread during the late 80s/early 90s when there was LOTS of media attention to the issue, and people would actually think about what they were doing. Now, a couple of years after the height of media attention to it, the problems are rising again (simply because people no longer think about the issue).

      In the same way, I would guess people might fall more easily for phish scams, once the become more rare again.

  2. Educate by Klar · · Score: 4, Insightful
    However, better user education and stronger security from online retailers, banks, and financial institutions is also needed to protect technically unsophisticated consumers from complex online cons like phishing attacks, Schmidt says.
    I have to say that I agree. These tools are great for newbie computer users. But I really think educating people on how to read a URL and not have to rely on a tool like this. If they don't understand the URL, using a 'caller id' program may not always be affective at preventing scams.

    Also, I would like to see a program that would pre-scan a URL and if it appears to be a fake Paypal or Visa site to put the actual domain, and display a warning to alert newbie users.
  3. Glasses by jobeus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Glasses would be a good anti-phishing tool... Seems almost 95% of the sites I come across just replace a . with a - somewhere. If people could see it more clearly......... :D

    1. Re:Glasses by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Glasses would be a good anti-phishing tool... Seems almost 95% of the sites I come across just replace a . with a - somewhere

      A normal-sized brain behind the glasses would work very well too. I mean, for example, the Microsoft-looking emails that require you to give a password, or a CC number or something: who the hell with a normal intelligence would fall for that one?

      Most scams look exactly like that: scams. They're so easy to spot with a vaguely critical eye that it's not funny. The problem is, who will educate a public that doesn't understand much about computers in the first place?

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  4. Already sluggish... by La_Boca · · Score: 5, Informative

    Does That Web Site Look Phishy?

    WholeSecurity's new software claims to identify fraudulent sites.

    Paul Roberts, IDG News Service
    Monday, August 16, 2004

    A new software tool from WholeSecurity can spot fraudulent Web sites used in online cons known as "phishing" scams, according to a statement from the company.

    Advertisement

    The new product, called Web Caller-ID, can detect Web pages dressed up to look like legitimate e-commerce sites. WholeSecurity is marketing the technology to banks, credit card companies, and online retailers as a way to prevent unwitting customers from accessing false sites, to reduce fraud, and increase confidence in online commerce, the company says.

    Phishing scams are online crimes that use unsolicited commercial, or "spam," e-mail to direct Internet users to Web sites controlled by thieves, but are designed to look like legitimate e-commerce sites. Users are asked to provide sensitive information such as a password, Social Security number, bank account, or credit card number, often under the guise of updating account information.

    Already in Use

    A version of Web Caller-ID is already being used by EBay in a feature called Account Guard, part of an EBay Web browser toolbar that users of the online auction site can download for free. The feature detects suspicious behavior, such as Web URLs that disguise the true Internet address of the site the user is visiting.

    Companies can license a Web browser plug-in from WholeSecurity, which can then be distributed to customers directly or as part of a Web browser toolbar. Alternatively, companies can sign up for an e-mail processing service from WholeSecurity that harvests information on phishing scams from spam e-mail or customer complaint e-mail sent to the company, WholeSecurity says.

    A Web browser-based management console lets administrators view suspected phisher sites, file complaints against spoof Web sites, or fine-tune the Web Caller-ID technology to adapt to their company's Web site.

    On the Rise

    Reports of phishing attacks have skyrocketed in recent months, according to the Anti-Phishing Working Group (APWG), a joint industry-law enforcement group.

    There were 1422 new, unique attacks reported to the APWG in June, a 19 percent increase over the previous month. Since the beginning of 2004, reports of the attacks have grown by 52 percent a month on average, the group says.

    A survey of 5000 adult Internet users by research firm Gartner released in April found that the number of phishing attacks spiked in the last year and that around 3 percent of those surveyed reported giving up personal financial or personal information after being drawn into a phishing scam. The results suggest that as many as 30 million adults have experienced a phishing attack and that 1.78 million adults could have fallen victim to the scams, Gartner says.

    Taking the First Step

    Web Caller-ID is not a cure-all for the phishing problem, but is a good first step to provide comprehensive protection from the scams, says Howard Schmidt, former White House cybersecurity advisor and the current chief information security officer at EBay.

    "These are some of the things we need to do moving forward--getting technology built into the Web browsers themselves to do these things," he says.

    However, better user education and stronger security from online retailers, banks, and financial institutions is also needed to protect technically unsophisticated consumers from complex online cons like phishing attacks, Schmidt says.

    "You can't put somebody in a car and tell them to drive, but not tell them what the brake and gas pedal are for," he says.

  5. Anti-phishing toolbar for FireFox by NewbieV · · Score: 4, Informative

    Spoofstick is a plugin for FireFox or Internet Explorer that can help identify 'phishy' sites while surfing.

    It does take a little more real estate out of the browser's window, but it's a pretty useful tool when teaching people about the dangers of clicking links blindly.

    --


    "For every right, an equal responsibility..."
  6. You mean... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...I wasn't supposed to give s1ashdot my credit card number to read this story?

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  7. Wrong Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The proper solution to phishing scams is
    1) Educate everyone not to give out confidential information to anyone.
    2) Track the phishing sites and publically hang the owner. These things are not difficult to track by the very nature of the scam.

  8. My rule is usually fairly simple by tekiegreg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just don't click on any links via email to anything unless you solicited it (such as an email verification to a mailing list you're subscribing to). When I'm in doubt, all I do is type in the URL to the bank/brokerage/etc. web site myself (fire up browser and type in homepage URL), log in and find out if there is anything going on. Most such websites have a way to look at everything and take any needed action right away after you type in a user/pass.

    *sigh* and on that note there is a sucker born every minute I suppose.

    --
    ...in bed
  9. phishing automated reply by djtech · · Score: 4, Funny

    What we need is a way to automatically reply to these phishing scams with bogus information. I'd like to be able to order everything sent in a spam message too with bogus information. Beat them at their own game!

    1. Re:phishing automated reply by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's for mortgage spammers and not phishers, but I'm a fan of the Unsolicited Commando project. It's a little Java app that spends its day filling out mortgage applications on spamvertised sites with completely believable - but totally bogus - personal data. The source is available so perhaps a clever person could randomly generate credit card numbers and adapt the program to attack phish sites.

  10. Will this reach the intended users? by broothal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People who are likely to fall for the usual phishing techniques are, unfortunately, not likely to install any tools to prevent phising. Odds are, that they never knew it existed before they fell for it.

  11. Email Phishing by TheOtherAgentM · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From what you and I probably see, yes. Phishing begins with an email, because we probably don't browse shady sites regularly. I don't know what the average user sees in their regular browsing. I can't even figure out where people get all the spyware from in the first place. As far as phishing emails, I know I get one email regularly that looks like a CitiBank email, but it is a .jpg file embedded. The URL has citi in it, but if you look closer, it's obviously not the right sight. I'd report it, but Citi Bank's online reporting sucks.

    1. Re:Email Phishing by james_marsh · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not sure what good it would do to report it to citi since there's nothing they can do about it except maybe send out emails to everyone in the world telling them not to believe emails claiming to be from them.
      There's just a slight flaw in that logic...

    2. Re:Email Phishing by realdpk · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, as someone who's working at a web host, I can tell you Citibank does take this sort of thing seriously, and they are interested to know where the sites are being hosted.

      Who knows what they do with that information. Maybe nothing. Still, it's worth reporting, if only to show that the community is against these frauds.

    3. Re:Email Phishing by aussersterne · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Citibank can't do anything about it anyway; they're not law enforcement, and even if they were, what exactly do you see law enforcement doing about SPAM or phish emails? Nada.

      I used to work at eBay and the phishing problem was terrible (though I didn't deal with it directly, that wasn't my department). When users would find out, they'd demand to know why eBay didn't do something about it. The people who worked on that floor would stand around in the smoking shed and bitch, "What do they want us to do, buy some guns and go to Romania and raid the guy's house wearing little eBay uniforms?"

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    4. Re:Email Phishing by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They can't do much about it upfront. However, as soon as it involves withdrawals from customer's accounts it moves over into fraud ... which they can do something about (via usual legal means). Neither Citibank, nor any of the others (I've seen BofA, Wells Fargo, and others) are going to acknowledge all the emails they get reporting these scams. Instead, the data is accumulated and those that report they lost money this way will be prioritized because these can be used for prosecution.

      Personally, I'm waiting for the point where we can have a Darwin's Award for the idiots who answer those emails ... y'know the point when one of them loses every last dime in a scam and commits suicide, dies from a badly produced batch of V@l1um or V1agr@, or tries to gain or lose inches and has an accident with the means thereto. When this garbage produces 0 results, no matter how many millions are sent out, it will self-destruct.

      --
      I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
  12. Here's my Anti-Phishing tool by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My Anti Phishing tool is my brain. I mean sometimes these phishing e-mails are nto even spoof so that they appear to come from the company that they are spoofing. Sometimes the website has graphics for the company they are trying to appear as and the URL is in CHINA! First off, No company shuld EVER ask you to click on a link and enter personal information for things. No mortgage company I know of will actually advertise in a spam and if they do, then your alert flag should go up. If you just use common sense, you should be more then able to determine if a web page or e-mail is a phishing attempt. Unfortunately, your grandma or your mom may not. I think that companies liek AOL need to add more training wheels to their service so to speak and help them with determining if something is legit or not. Would I ever load such software? No I would not because I don't need it....but my mom might.

    --

    Gorkman

  13. Re:Technological solution to a social problem by MindStalker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hu? No, the general consensus was you can't legislate these problems away, ie spam, phishing etc.
    User education is the most important, but technical solutions have to be used. Thats like saying you shouldn't bother with having a virus scanner, because people should all be taught to avoid viruses.

  14. AntiPhishiing.org by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is more information, the SANS Internet Storm Center has seen much activity (and growing) of this shit.



    --------

  15. Phishing is a big problem for hosting companies by gtrubetskoy · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Phishers need a place to host their fake sites, and hosting companies like ours are prime targets for phishers to set up their "collection points", and we see a lot of those.

    My theory is that unlike the script-kiddies of the old days, 99% of all phishing is work of organized crime. I believe that they recruit users at ISP's in places where internet (or any for that matter) law is not enforced (like Kosovo), they provide people simple step-by-step instructions on what to do, give them lists of fake card numbers and pay them based on the number of accounts hacked (e.g. $1 for every 50 good passwords). The actual cleaning out of the accounts probably happens elsewhere and at a much higher level because you need a much more elaborate system for it (off-shore bank accounts, etc). At least if I was doing it, this is how I would set it up. The users appear to be not very smart - we often see weird typos, names spelled in all caps and other dead giveaways - why would ANNE FISHER from Ohio signup for a year of virtual hosting and register a domain XABCDFERNG.COM for 10 years?

    We see that they are getting more elaborate in their attempts to sign up for an account. They try to use proxies or zombies now (because most same companies will flat out refuse any attempts to sign up from Indonesia, Romania, etc.).

    A funny side note - we got a copy of a credit card statement from one of the unfortunate cardmembers whose card's been stolen as part of the "chargeback" report, and among various hosting accounts they signed up for, there was an $20 contribution to moveon.org - go figure!

    Right now the best way to fight off phishers is to attempt to speak to the customer in person, it has worked 100% for us so far. But since this phishing thing is probably big money for some mafia boss, I think the motivation is there for them to get more technologically advanced, and I wouldn't be surprised if we start seeing fake VoIP phone numbers provided where the criminals would answer the phone in English and pretend to be cardmembers.

    Another very unfortunate side-ffect of this is that it's the merchants who east the cost of it. For every instance of fraud, we get the funds withheld and transferred back to the cardmember (don't be fooled by those reports of "poor" cc companies bearing the cost of fraud!) AND we get slapped with an $25-$50 penalty by the CC processing company AND our rates go up. So it's almost in their interest that cards get stolen, it simply means more revenue for them. Now our services are "virtual", but for those who actually ship something physical (like a shirt), they get to eat the cost of that as well.

  16. List of IPs used by phishers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Phish Net

    Some folks here may find it usefull.

  17. Cool phishing detection quiz by frozenray · · Score: 5, Informative


    This nifty quiz can help you assess your phishing detection abilities. Recommended.

    --
    "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
  18. Firefox/IE by mrseigen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've noticed that neither Firefox nor new versions of IE let you do the www.cnn.com@http://myattackersite.com phishing vulnerability; Firefox warns you (as long as myattackersite.com doesn't request authentication), IE just doesn't let you do it as far as I've seen (but this is hearsay; I haven't used IE in years).

  19. What banks *should* do! by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 4, Interesting
    What banks (and eBay) should do is NEVER, EVER send an email to customers. Period.

    And on their websites they should say on top: "REMEMBER: WE *NEVER* SEND YOU EMAIL ABOUT ANYTHING."

    If you want to know something, you just visit eBay or your bank account.

  20. First step by bigberk · · Score: 5, Informative

    The first step is obviously to check the headers of an email you receive. Just see who sent you the damn thing (from Received headers). Was it actually an IP belonging to .paypal.com? This is easy to check using 'whois'. If the whois lookup shows the IP delivering you the email is from the company you expect (VISA, Paypal, Ebay) then it's fine.

    OK, how about an example. Take this US Bank phishing scam, here are the Received headers:

    Received: by mail.pc9.org (Postfix, from userid 82)
    id 2E7E6AC1B; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
    Received: from usbank.com (unknown [211.209.208.87])
    by mail.pc9.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BCF24AC03
    for <bigberk@users.pc9.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
    Received: from 0.212.252.18 by 211.209.208.87; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 09:08:18 -0600

    The first Received hop is my ISP. The second Received hop is the only important one; it describes the connecting host. Note that the host here pretended to be usbank.com but that name is a sender-supplied ID; it's worthless. What you're looking for is the IP address between square brackets, which can not be forged. Now just check 211.209.208.87 using whois

    $ whois 211.209.208.87
    ...
    [ Organization Information ]
    Organization ID : ORG3930
    Org Name : Hanaro Telecom Inc.
    State : SEOUL
    Address : Shindongah Bldg., 43 Taepyeongno2-Ga Jung-Gu
    Zip Code : 100-733
    ...

    See, easy. This email came from Korea, not US Bank. It's a scam!