Slashdot Mirror


Digital Cable HDTV Tuner Card Reviewed

Jack Kolesar of AMDPower writes "We have posted a review of a PC HDTV Tuner card that can receive QAM (Digital Cable) signals along with traditional 8VSB signals. This appears to be the first PC Card which can accomplish this task. Further, the software also comes with a utility to downsample HDTV content to DVD and DivX. "

33 of 193 comments (clear)

  1. Warm up the keyboard by Lord+Grey · · Score: 4, Informative
    Minimum PC Requirements:
    • ...
    • Windows ME/ 2000/ XP or later version of Windows
    • ...
    Boo, hiss. Who's up for some driver coding?
    --
    // Beyond Here Lie Dragons
    1. Re:Warm up the keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Somebody else. Free software is like that, one million eyeballs and one burnt out developer!

      Gimmie gimmie gimme!

    2. Re:Warm up the keyboard by softwave · · Score: 5, Funny

      Boo, hiss. Who's up for some driver coding?
      by any means, feel free :)

    3. Re:Warm up the keyboard by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why can't this happen, linux "adopts" or "implements" Windows driver model, so that Windows drivers for devices like this can be installed and used?

      I know some of this exists for the wireless networking stuff, and nVidia and ATi's linux efforts are pretty much recompiles of the windows drivers..

      Hell, even forget Windows driver model.. Come up with a new, universal model. Hardware companies only need to write and test one driver which you go ahead and use under Windows, Linux, BSD, OS/X, whatever..

      Thats my idea anyways. Something to take the world one step closer to my dream where the OS installed on your machine doesn't mean shit, since they all implement the same API's, run the same binaries, and use the same drivers. Less glory for the kernel hackers, perhaps.

      This is what bothers me about linux' monolithic approach. It's like NIH syndrome to the extreme. Every driver for every piece of hardware has to be rewritten by scratch and approved by Linus to make it into the kernel. It's a longer process than submitting your drivers to MSFT to be "digitally signed" and stuck on Windows Update.

      As for this card, there's likely proprietary trade secrets and bullshit in there and the specs will never be released. They're probably under contract to enforce the "no copy" bit and macrovision output and all that BS. That stuff could be changed in an OSS driver, so that driver can't exist. That's why no TV out from ATi for linux - legally they have to ensure that anytime a DVD is played, macrovision on the TV out is enabled..

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:Warm up the keyboard by Donoho · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Free software is like that, one million eyeballs and one burnt out developer!

      That's the beauty of free software... all it takes is one burn out developer to get the ball rolling, with no allegiance or agenda other than getting the necessary job done.

    5. Re:Warm up the keyboard by bsd4me · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hell, even forget Windows driver model.. Come up with a new, universal model. Hardware companies only need to write and test one driver which you go ahead and use under Windows, Linux, BSD, OS/X, whatever..

      Not to sound like a prick, but have you ever written a device driver?

      The unix device driver model (or at least it used to; I haven't written a unix driver in years) is fairly simple. The driver defines a few entry points: read(), write(), ioctl(), open(), close(), and select() (am I missing any?). That is pretty much where the similarity ends. The code to actually talk to the device (ie, the register level stuff) is the same between OSes, but the OS stuff is for the most part really OS dependent. This is more complicated now because of kernel threading and other modern kernel techniques.

      --

      (S(SKK)(SKK))(S(SKK)(SKK))

    6. Re:Warm up the keyboard by dasmegabyte · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course, the problem with free software is that this driver won't full support the features of the device for several years and due to poor access to documentation or software-only features may never support some things that make the card worth buying. The software and the driver itself will probably have an inscrutable, ugly and complex interface that only works from the command line/KDE/Gnome and if you have a problem with it your only options are to fix it yourself (assuming you have programming ability and can figure out what the problem is) or pay a high hourly price for somebody else to do it.

      Meanwhile, your stupid buddies who paid their Windows Tax have been running the thing for a year without a major problem, and have spent all the time they saved by not fucking around with beta drivers watching TV and generally enjoying their purchase. Problems they had during setup were fixed by the company's technical support staff because their platform is actually supported.

      Of course, if the company EOL's the card or goes out of business entirely, the Linux driver will still work, whereas the Windows version will stagnate and die. Iomega, I'm looking in your direction as I type this.

      In short: the beauty of free-as-in-beer is only skin deep, and its true value -- free-as-in-freedom -- lies underneath a mountain of major annoyances.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    7. Re:Warm up the keyboard by digitalgiblet · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If I had moderator points today I would mod this one up (parent message of this reply for those keeping score at home). Pessimistic (from the OSS point of view), but fair and insightful.

      Free-as-in-freedom is worth much more than free-as-in-beer, but it does come with costs. ALL freedom comes with costs...

      Like everything else in life, we must pick our battles. As much as I value the ideals of free-as-in-freedom software, I am also pragmatic enough to know that my TIME is worth something, and I must pick and choose the places where I am willing to trade time for freedom or freedom for time.

  2. Review's Conclusion (plus linux advice): by BubbaThePirate · · Score: 5, Informative
    Quoth the site:

    "Conclusion

    The Fusion HDTV III QAM can be seen online at specialty stores like Digital Connection for around $170.00. This is around $100.00 cheaper than a similar hardware decoder card by MyHD. However, I'm certain that the MyHD or AccessDTV cards will deliver a far more stable image. What the Fusion has going for it is QAM reception and the included DVD convector software. It also functions with TitanTV for scheduled recording. If you are concerned about possible jerkiness and dropped frames (I assume you are) you should first try out the demo from the DVico website. ATI's card appears to be a software-based card as well from what I can tell. This card retails for $199.00 but I have not had the opportunity to test it. For the Linux buffs out there, check out PCHDTV when you get a chance. This company offers a software-based HDTV Tuner Card similar to the original Fusion I design which is exclusively for Linux. It uses the Xine engine for the HD decoding. Fun Stuff."

    --

    -- "I'm not a religious man, but if you're up there, save me Superman..."

  3. Wheee! by general_re · · Score: 4, Funny
    Warning: mysql_pconnect(): Too many connections in /home/virtual/site27/fst/var/www/html/mainfile.php 4 on line 19
    Unable to select database

    What a great review - now where can I get my hands on this thing? :)

    --
    ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
  4. great by Nuttles · · Score: 5, Funny

    techies already don't get enough exercise, now I won't have to even swival my chair to look from my monitor to my TV. Isn't there a lobbying group for the the support of tech people not gaining any more weight? Where is my representation? Where is my protection from myself?

    Nuttles
    Saved by Grace

  5. Anyone grab a mirror? by ralf1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Prior to the instant server death? Or know the product name since its not referenced in the summary, so I can look for something on it?

    --
    "Would you, could you, with a goat?" Dr Seuss
  6. you bastards by MachineShedFred · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was really interested in reading this article, as I've been looking for something to do this, and with only 4 comments posted, this is what I get:

    Warning: mysql_pconnect(): Too many connections in /home/virtual/site27/fst/var/www/html/mainfile.php 4 on line 19
    Unable to select database

    Now that AMDPower's servers have melted into a pool of molten plastic and silicon on the datacenter floor, I hope you're happy!

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  7. It's all fun and games... by xenostar · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's all fun and games until you delete something important because you were watching the Olsen twins make out with each other in the always-on-top TV window in the corner of your screen.

    1. Re:It's all fun and games... by Wescotte · · Score: 4, Funny

      Uh, if you were watching the Olsen twins making out with each other I doubt you'd have a hand free to accidently delete something

  8. Not the holy grail... by jared_hanson · · Score: 4, Informative

    What is really needed in this space is a decoder card that also has a CableCARD slot. I don't care whether the CableCARD is inside the case or has an external slot, it doesn't really matter to me.

    The fact of the matter is that most QAM signals on digital cable are scrambled. Previously, you had to have a set-top box with descrambling chips in it to watch the TV. With cable card, however, these crypto chips are sparated out so the cable company can had you a CableCARD, and you can buy whatever set-top box you want.

    So, even if you get this card, you aren't going to be able to watch many digital cable channels with it since they will all be encrypted (at least here in the US). Now, when they release a version with CableCARD, I'll jump all over it (and begin the search/code for Linux drivers).

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    1. Re:Not the holy grail... by bofkentucky · · Score: 3, Funny

      As I understand it, the 1st Gen Cablecard spec is pretty crippled, straight decrypt only. For Program Guides/PPV/other, we have to wait for CableCard v2

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
  9. Innie, not Outtie by grunt107 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the pictures it looks like all connections are inputs, with no TVOut.

    It would be nice if this had composite out to TV(A/V), not just the 'Play on PC'. Combine w/PC-based controller (MythTV), and I would not need to add HDDVR and HDTuner to get HD picture.

  10. what about encrypted digital content by gordona · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Its fine to have a card that can receive QAM signals from cable. However, as the article states, this card can only receive in-the-clear (unencrypted) content. Since most cable operators in north america encrypt their high value content (HD is definitely high value), the ability of the card to decode QAM signals is of limited value. Additionally, the modulation modes are not evident. That is, can the card decode 64QAM and 256QAM?

    --
    "Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!" -- Dr. Strangelove
    1. Re:what about encrypted digital content by radixvir · · Score: 3, Informative

      That is, can the card decode 64QAM and 256QAM?

      it says in the article it can decode both

    2. Re:what about encrypted digital content by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What about decrypting it in software?

      I know there were tons of software descramblers for Nargavision, or whatever that was called.

      Can a digital cable signal be decrypted? How strong is the encryption? As old as it is, I'd imagine the first digital set top boxes couldn't have had too much horsepower, so the scheme must be relatively simple to decode that much data on-the-fly..

      Could "decoders" (password hashes?) be bought and downloaded from the cable company?

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  11. The card does not work properly with QAM channels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Although I have posted about this before, I have recieved "threats" due to my "misrepresentation" of the card on slashdot. Do a search on http://www.avsforums.com and you will see that the software for this card is flaky and Fusion will not release the specifications so independant driver development can take place. If you buy this card, only get it for over-the-air HDTV. Again, do your research before buying this card, it does not work as advertised.

  12. Re:Would this work with UK Digital Cable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Check out linuxtv.org

    Works great with mythtv for both digital cable and freeview

  13. Summarized Review by ianbnet · · Score: 5, Informative

    This took me forever to put together (F5 F5 F5), so you better like it. This is a very partial selection of the review; note that there are usually chunks missing between paragraphs. Go visit the site and give them ad revenue once they're stable again.

    Fusion III Gold QAM Card

    It has been nearly three years since I reviewed one of the first HDTV Tuner cards to hit the market. At that time, the Access DTV card retailed for $400.00 and the only HDTV station available in my area was the local CBS. While the adoption of High Definition has improved greatly, I have to admit that it has been slower than I expected. Equally as surprising is the limited availability of HDTV tuner cards. Until recently, there were few players in this market. I am happy to say that this is starting to change. Manufacturers such as Hauppauge, ATI, and Dvico have developed affordable HDTV cards. Today, we are looking at one of these cards, the Dvico Fusion III Gold QAM. What makes this card unique are some very exciting features that others do not offer. Most notably is the reception of QAM modulated streams. What is QAM you ask? Simply put, DIGITAL CABLE.

    The Fusion also allows you to adjust the display ratio for virtually any screen. One of the features that we beta testers fought for was the ability to do a Pan & Scan from a 16x9 source. Nearly all HDTV broadcast are in a 16x9 aspect ratio. However, not all content is in 16x9. So, if the local news is being shown on CBS-HD, there will be black bars on the left an right of the screen. This is acceptable for a 16x9 screen. However, if the image is being shown on a 4x3 screen (computer monitor), you end up with a square image inside of a square screen. Luckily, Pan & Scan allows you to fill the entire screen with the image.

    A recent feature which was added lately (not shown in this screenshot) is the ability to get analog audio through the PCI bus. Otherwise, you need to use an internal audio jumper cable for analog television. HDTV AC-3 audio is decoded through software and can be output as either 2CH analog, 5CH analog, or straight through the digital SPDIF out of your sound card.

    For those of you who have still not seen HDTV up close, stop now and go download the Fusion Demo. HDTV on a computer monitor is quite impressive. I found the image quality to be remarkable on the Fusion and have included some screen shots below. Keep in mind that these are compressed JPEGs. Here you can see analog TV next to HDTV from a real broadcast that I recordeed of the same sitcom. The images speak for themselves. Click for a larger view.

    NTSC Broadcast
    ATSC Broadcast

    While I found the image quality to be outstanding, I cannot say the same for the decoding capabilities. Some broadcasts seem to be quite jumpy depending on which version of drivers and software that I was using. 720P broadcasts were jumpier than 1080i. What is strange is that the CPU utilization was practically nothing using DxVA, around 30%. Still, at some times I saw dropped frames. When speaking to DVico about this, I was told that they are experiencing some problem with nForce based boards. However, I also tested the card on a VIA board with similar results. DvXA did deliver a much better image than pure-software decoding. Using software-only also restricts full-scale decoding. The software decoding option offers quarter, half, and full-scale decoding. Above half-scale was unwatchable on my 3200+. The image shown above is taken from a full-scale DxVA grab.

    Analog decoding was exceptional. The software has built-in deinterlacing capabilities which greatly improves the image quality of analog broadcasts. However, a full-out deinterlacer such as DScaler yields better results.

    QAM Decoding

    Here is where things get a bit tricky. While the Fusion III Gold QAM is capable of receiving and decoding QAM, it CANNOT decode an encrypted channel. That means that it depends entirely on what your local cable company is encrypting for their d

    --
    --------------------- -me, Crusher of those who are Foolish (don't be foolish)
  14. Re:Not the first card. Try the ATI HDTV Wonder by figleaf · · Score: 3, Informative

    The ATI card has a chip to handle QAM but unfortunatenly it is disabled.
    Therefore it is no use for most Digital Cable in the US even if the signal is not encrypted.

  15. Re:Not the first card. Try the ATI HDTV Wonder by Jack+Kolesar · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hi I'm the author of the article. Stupid little virtual server... Anyway, It does receive HDTV QAM. That is what it is built for. It also receives "standard" digital cable. It DOES need to be UNENCRYPTED though.

  16. Wrong... by Critical_ · · Score: 3, Informative

    The original post is 100% correct. S/he mistyped the address since its actually avsforum.com

  17. Who needs the cablecard? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, I've been thinking about modifying a few cable modems to intercept the QPSK OOB signal on digital cable, and spoof it. Have 2 cable modems, with some splitters and filters in between them, so that we can get QAM to the set top box, but the first cable modem could listen/talk to the headend, and the second cable modem could listen/talk to the cablebox.

    For instance, docsis cable modems would seem to be able to ahndle this, assuming they have a frequency agile tuner (most do, I believe), and aren't one chip solutions (RCA ones come to mind).

    Anyone care to comment?

    1. Re:Who needs the cablecard? by _anomaly_ · · Score: 3, Funny
      Anyone care to comment?

      If I knew what the hell you were talking about...
      :-)

      --
      "I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
  18. Re:The card does not work properly with QAM channe by Jack+Kolesar · · Score: 4, Informative

    Let me clear up a few things about this card. There were several revisions of it and it was very hard trying to get QAM to function properly from overseas. They actually released a version that was supposed to do QAM. It was the Non-Gold version of the Fusion III. The Gold version does function with QAM. And, I have tested it as working at home. As always, with any hardware, YMMV. Keep in mind again that if its encrypted (most content is) you're not going to get a picture. I have included a screenshot in the article of it actually working with a digital preview station.

  19. Re:Is CableCARD even an option yet? by jared_hanson · · Score: 4, Informative

    The FFC requires that any cable operator with over a certain amount of bandwidth on their network give out CableCARDs at the customer's request. As far as I know, the deadline for compliance was July 1st. I could be wrong on the specifics, but I do know the deadline has come and gone, so a majority of cable companies should comply by now. My cable company does.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
  20. Linux driver development for Fusion III QAM by no_such_user · · Score: 5, Informative

    YES!!! There is a Linux driver for this card!

    Chris Pascoe has written a Linux driver for the Austrailian version of the card. See: http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~chrisp/DVICO-Linux/. AFAIK, the only difference between the Austrailian and American versions is the tuner. If we can find the codes (perhaps by sniffing them w/ a homebrew I2C sniffer), we should be able to have a fully-functioning driver for the US card.

    Bonus: the card is half-height, and comes with a low-profile PCI backplate, which would make it fit nicely into a small MythTV-powered PVR.

  21. Re:Not the first card. Try the ATI HDTV Wonder by HBergeron · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hate to crap on another poster (I really do) but this fella got modded up for this post and I thought a clarification would be helpful...

    The issue here is NOT a new TV card, those are common and would not rate a story on /. What WAS interesting is this cards ability to receive CABLE hdtv. So "These cards aren't for receiving digital cable" wins at least the weekly, if not monthly award for missing the point entirely.

    What people want to do is record their Sopranos, or concerts or HD ESPN football games, and right now, and forever more, none of the current crop of HDPC cards can do that. Apparently this one really can't either, but including the feature is a step in the right direction. Next maybe someone with real customer orientation and some coding skills may actually put out a working card with a "cable card" slot for decryption, and then we'd be cooking with gas. Watch this space.

    --
    THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal...