Instead of flash memory soldered to the board, microSD is ubiquitous and cheap -- and makes the device effectively unbrickable. Sure, there are bootloaders with recovery features, but it's not as simple as writing a new image to SD. Raspberry Pi got it right in this department. It's a shame there's no PCIe bus on the raspi...
DD-WRT is no walk in the park. It's difficult to find a stable version for newer hardware, if there even is a recent release considered stable. Examples: I bought a router that was supposed to be compatible, but it turned out that the only release available wasn't stable. I installed it anyway, but I later found out it wouldn't accept a manually entered IP (due to a javascript problem on the web GUI - resolved in a later release) which turned into a huge headache. On another release (different router), the 5GHz radio didn't work - something about the driver. On the other hand, I have a slightly older router with DD-WRT which has been up for prob over a year with no issues. Verdict... ? If you do your research first and really vet the device you're going to use, you might be okay.
On the other hand, I've setup three boxes w/ pfSense in the past year, and each has been stable and good to me. The gui is certainly more cryptic than DD-WRT, but it's also far more powerful (as it should be, as it's running on beefier hardware). I've run it on an old P4 (the never ending supply of SFF Dell P4 desktops are good for this), but for something more efficient (and fanless) I've also installed it on inexpensive Atom-based boxes. Still more energy (and more expensive) than a ARM-based device, but the features and stability have been worth it. For WiFi, I just use an inexpensive AP-only device
This adapter is often a device that must match the type of cable system your provider runs
I was under the impression that this was under the umbrella of the CableLabs OpenCable spec, which means, in theory, it'd be a standard. And, hey, what about (I should think twice before mentioning this, but here goes nothing...) True2Way?
Btw, the fact that you even need one pretty much confirms your cable system is crap...
I'm not usually one to defend my cable company, but I'll make an exception this time. The current implementation of SDV is crap, yes. But the infrastructure is most certainly not. So instead of wasting millions of dollars to upgrade, we use what we have now and fit as much as we can. Besides, practically speaking, building a better infrastructure won't give me anything I don't have now, except a higher cable bill.
1) Lower your damn prices already! You'd have people beating down the doors if you'd lower your monthly fee to $5/month, and you'd still be making good money to boot! 2) Stop treating your old customers as second-class citizens! The old Tivos work just fine, so why aren't you porting new features to these units? Even UI/UX improvements which take negligible CPU or memory usage are never implemented. Sure, there are a lot of lifetime account holders, but you're still collecting monthly fees on some of these, right? 3) Integrate the "tuning adapter" for switched digital video to inside the Tivo. The fact that I need such a thing in the first place is ridiculous. 4) Lower your damn prices already! $60 for a wireless G dongle? $90 for an N wireless bridge?! C'mon! 5) What's the deal with CableCard, anyway? Are cable companies going to continue to support this? What about users of IP-based services, like AT&T's U-verse? 6) Don't get me started on copy-protection... 7) Lower your damn prices already! $5/mo -- it's worth repeating!
12 hours and only 37 comments? The response to a device like this should be far greater on a site like Slashdot. *Sigh*.
Anyway, I've always felt TAPR kits were not entirely within my grasp due to either high prices or high complexity. I hope this will be an affordable kit which doesn't require a ton of SMD soldering. Take the lead from Raspberry Pi - small, simple, affordable hardware.
A person can believe in a god, belong to a religious community, and integrate that belief and community into their daily lives without it becoming obsessive and/or intrusive. In my book, that's what lets science and religion remain compatible.
Can she become a competent civil engineer and build bridges as well as the next person? Probably. A talented chemist? Sure. You're right, it is a big house. But if she can find the devil in an RFID badge, I'm wondering what else she'll shun because of a religious concern. That's the shadow I'm talking about.
Off topic? Given that it's the protesters PRIMARY ARGUMENT, it seems pretty damn on topic to me.
Anyway, I find it difficult to reconcile the religious aspect of her argument with the fact that she's attending a science and engineering based magnet school. I'm not saying that religion and science are inherently incompatible, but I am saying that her equating an RFID badge to the "mark of the beast" makes me think her devotion to her religion will place a shadow over her science education.
FWIW, the article says the school offered to disable the electronic portion of the badge, but that the school requires the parents to stop protesting. I would love to hear the school's side of this story.
I'm all for this, especially living in a 2nd-class city (when it comes to concerts). But just as important as getting artists to play here is removing Ticketmaster from the equation. Could this mean the ticket price is what you pay, no more hidden service fees, etc.? No more monopoly by one ticket service? I won't get my hopes up... surely TM will just buy them if they show any sign of doing well.
Wordperfect was *the* standard word processor in the late 80's/early 90's. When Microsoft's Word 2.0 came out, with a beautiful GUI and no more finger-contorting F-key combos which required a chart to use, it **blew away** Wordperfect. Excel's inline graphs, expression helper, and crazy-easy cell formatting **blew away** Quattro Pro. Access' drag and drop table linking, virtually automatic query generation, and included example dbs and help system **blew away** Paradox/Dbase. It was a revolution that Microsoft ushered in. For most laypeople, it wasn't just cool, it was near magic. First they made "cool" killer apps when others were stagnant and relying upon their entrenched position to keep up sales. And then they put in place anti-competitive agreements with OEMs to make sure they kept their position.
In the late 90's, Microsoft was no longer cool for end users, but for developers and their associated sales force, they sure were. Devs were EXCITED to use MS's development tools and languages (VB/C++/Interdev/etc.). It was cheap to get started, plus there were a ton of resources for cheap training. SQL Server had easy hooks into all of the MS stuff, and watching a five minute demo on linking a SQL Server db to your web app was powerful. A new generation of IT admins preferred Windows NT's GUI to command line Solaris/Irix/AIX/etc. This was all backed by the ease of becoming a Microsoft partner, which would mean a steady flow of sales leads to your shop. For better or worse, their technologies revolutionized a whole generation of developers who thought MS was cool. First they had cool tools when others were stagnant and relying upon their entrenched position to keep up sales. Then they used shady, anti-competitive tactics to keep that position.
All I'm saying is that they were perceived as cool at one point. I'm also saying that I'm glad that era looks to be over.
(1) Good on them for going closed source. 5)... If Makerbot is going closed source all the way, that may be enough of a push to get me to buy something else.
Wait... what? So, let me paraphrase: "Yay on closed source! Now, get out of my way while I find something open source..."
I know this won't help the OP now, but If you live in a disaster-prone area and you could ever be hours away from a sudden evac, consider setting up your hardware as if you were doing a mobile installation. 19" rack cabinets on casters, which can be quickly pushed to a truck. Note: just because you have wheels on your rack doesn't mean they're meant to be moved when loaded down with equipment. But the appropriate equipment. If you want to see something like this in action, go to a major televised sporting event a couple of days before the event starts and ask nicely to talk to the tech manager.
If "el-cheapo" refers to MVNO operators like Virgin, Boost, Page Plus, etc., they're cheaper, but they're just resellers of the big four. As soon as they're seen as a threat, their carriers will up their wholesale costs and MVNOs will be forced to charge rates matching the carriers they're reselling.
But why does this announcement surprise anyone? Let's not forget, the subscribers are not the customers -- the shareholders are. Until there's a carrier where those two parties are one and the same, the subscribers will always, always be on the losing end of the deal.
They're telling me to bring the ID, not that they're going to record the info from my ID. If they simply want to *look* at my ID, e.g. to verify that I'm the purchaser, that's fine with me. Entering that info into their database(s) is NOT fine with me.
It's high time that USA also gets "All sales are final" rules, like most of the world. Having people return fully working items that then have to be sold cheap drives up prices for all of us who don't play that game.
Liberal return policies make customers more likely to buy items due to the perceived safety net of said policy, resulting in greater sales, driving down prices for all of us. Plus, restocking fees exist expressly to discourage those who "borrow" items. The only time ID should be requested is when the customer cannot present a receipt.
You're talking about using NTSC/PAL analog video here -- which is completely inadequate if you'd need to actually identify someone. Even if you're lucky enough to get the perps face(s) looking straight into the camera (which you won't -- the angle you're going to have the cameras at will make it more than likely their faces will be covered by a baseball cap or something), there just isn't enough going to be the resolution necessary to be able to ID them, especially with cheap cameras from DX over long runs of cat5. Maybe IP cameras at higher resolution would be better? Just don't cheap out with low end toys (e.g. the Dlink DCS-903L I have has disappointed me).
Best Buy recently bought MindShift, a managed service provider (e.g. mail hosting, "cloud" services, etc.). I promptly "shifted" myself away from them -- no way in hell I'm going to let Best Buy host my email! But this just goes to show you that they're going to be making themselves over as a services company. It's only a matter of time before they purchase Sprint or T-Mobile.
B&H's salesforce won't give you the time of day until you're ready to spend $5k+. I could barely get them to point me to the right end of the store, never mind answer questions I had, when I was after a $100 item. I can only imagine they'd simply stop talking to you and walk away if you mentioned the words "price match". Personally, I'll never do business with them again. They are the definition of a pre-sales showroom in my book.
Consider holding the video conference using the lowest-common-denominator, e.g. Skype, but having the remote party also record it locally using a higher quality codec with standalone video recording app. Once the interview is over, have the remote party compress the file (Handbrake is easy to use, even for non-tech minded) and transfer it using conventional means (FTP, etc.). Though this might mean you'd need two cameras at the remote location (unless you have a way to split a video device to two different apps), it will eliminate network bottlenecks, latency, and resolution constraints.
Granted, It's not x86, and the cpu is significantly slower, but with h.264 accelerated decoding, HDMI, small footprint, low cost ($25/$35 for the board!), a focus on Linux support (and therefore, hopefully, robust drivers), and boot from SD, the Raspberry Pi should be able to put a serious dent into Via's HTPC market. It has a LOT of potential, and this is only a 1st gen device.
Let IBM's Watson analyze the interview for a while to come out with the killer app for the iPhone 5: Stevie. It's just like Siri, expect now YOU'RE the personal assistant.
So if it's the oxygen we need to worry about destroying our optical media, how about storing discs in a case which we can fill with something that's not oxygen? Better yet, a light-tight, insulated container with a mechanism to replace the oxygen with, what, nitrogen or something. Would this solve the problem of degrading DVDs?
Zimbra is owned by VMWare now. They have a history of providing free versions of their software (e.g. VMWare Player, ESXi free), so that's a good sign. But I still feel that it's a strange fit.
Slashdot Mirror
Instead of flash memory soldered to the board, microSD is ubiquitous and cheap -- and makes the device effectively unbrickable. Sure, there are bootloaders with recovery features, but it's not as simple as writing a new image to SD. Raspberry Pi got it right in this department. It's a shame there's no PCIe bus on the raspi...
Perhaps Statler and Waldorf...
DD-WRT is no walk in the park. It's difficult to find a stable version for newer hardware, if there even is a recent release considered stable. Examples: I bought a router that was supposed to be compatible, but it turned out that the only release available wasn't stable. I installed it anyway, but I later found out it wouldn't accept a manually entered IP (due to a javascript problem on the web GUI - resolved in a later release) which turned into a huge headache. On another release (different router), the 5GHz radio didn't work - something about the driver. On the other hand, I have a slightly older router with DD-WRT which has been up for prob over a year with no issues. Verdict... ? If you do your research first and really vet the device you're going to use, you might be okay.
On the other hand, I've setup three boxes w/ pfSense in the past year, and each has been stable and good to me. The gui is certainly more cryptic than DD-WRT, but it's also far more powerful (as it should be, as it's running on beefier hardware). I've run it on an old P4 (the never ending supply of SFF Dell P4 desktops are good for this), but for something more efficient (and fanless) I've also installed it on inexpensive Atom-based boxes. Still more energy (and more expensive) than a ARM-based device, but the features and stability have been worth it. For WiFi, I just use an inexpensive AP-only device
This adapter is often a device that must match the type of cable system your provider runs
I was under the impression that this was under the umbrella of the CableLabs OpenCable spec, which means, in theory, it'd be a standard. And, hey, what about (I should think twice before mentioning this, but here goes nothing...) True2Way?
Btw, the fact that you even need one pretty much confirms your cable system is crap...
I'm not usually one to defend my cable company, but I'll make an exception this time. The current implementation of SDV is crap, yes. But the infrastructure is most certainly not. So instead of wasting millions of dollars to upgrade, we use what we have now and fit as much as we can. Besides, practically speaking, building a better infrastructure won't give me anything I don't have now, except a higher cable bill.
Dear Tivo,
1) Lower your damn prices already! You'd have people beating down the doors if you'd lower your monthly fee to $5/month, and you'd still be making good money to boot!
2) Stop treating your old customers as second-class citizens! The old Tivos work just fine, so why aren't you porting new features to these units? Even UI/UX improvements which take negligible CPU or memory usage are never implemented. Sure, there are a lot of lifetime account holders, but you're still collecting monthly fees on some of these, right?
3) Integrate the "tuning adapter" for switched digital video to inside the Tivo. The fact that I need such a thing in the first place is ridiculous.
4) Lower your damn prices already! $60 for a wireless G dongle? $90 for an N wireless bridge?! C'mon!
5) What's the deal with CableCard, anyway? Are cable companies going to continue to support this? What about users of IP-based services, like AT&T's U-verse?
6) Don't get me started on copy-protection...
7) Lower your damn prices already! $5/mo -- it's worth repeating!
Thanks,
Me
12 hours and only 37 comments? The response to a device like this should be far greater on a site like Slashdot. *Sigh*.
Anyway, I've always felt TAPR kits were not entirely within my grasp due to either high prices or high complexity. I hope this will be an affordable kit which doesn't require a ton of SMD soldering. Take the lead from Raspberry Pi - small, simple, affordable hardware.
Good luck! I'll see you guys at Dayton!
A person can believe in a god, belong to a religious community, and integrate that belief and community into their daily lives without it becoming obsessive and/or intrusive. In my book, that's what lets science and religion remain compatible.
Can she become a competent civil engineer and build bridges as well as the next person? Probably. A talented chemist? Sure. You're right, it is a big house. But if she can find the devil in an RFID badge, I'm wondering what else she'll shun because of a religious concern. That's the shadow I'm talking about.
Off topic? Given that it's the protesters PRIMARY ARGUMENT, it seems pretty damn on topic to me.
Anyway, I find it difficult to reconcile the religious aspect of her argument with the fact that she's attending a science and engineering based magnet school. I'm not saying that religion and science are inherently incompatible, but I am saying that her equating an RFID badge to the "mark of the beast" makes me think her devotion to her religion will place a shadow over her science education.
FWIW, the article says the school offered to disable the electronic portion of the badge, but that the school requires the parents to stop protesting. I would love to hear the school's side of this story.
I'm all for this, especially living in a 2nd-class city (when it comes to concerts). But just as important as getting artists to play here is removing Ticketmaster from the equation. Could this mean the ticket price is what you pay, no more hidden service fees, etc.? No more monopoly by one ticket service? I won't get my hopes up... surely TM will just buy them if they show any sign of doing well.
Wordperfect was *the* standard word processor in the late 80's/early 90's. When Microsoft's Word 2.0 came out, with a beautiful GUI and no more finger-contorting F-key combos which required a chart to use, it **blew away** Wordperfect. Excel's inline graphs, expression helper, and crazy-easy cell formatting **blew away** Quattro Pro. Access' drag and drop table linking, virtually automatic query generation, and included example dbs and help system **blew away** Paradox/Dbase. It was a revolution that Microsoft ushered in. For most laypeople, it wasn't just cool, it was near magic. First they made "cool" killer apps when others were stagnant and relying upon their entrenched position to keep up sales. And then they put in place anti-competitive agreements with OEMs to make sure they kept their position.
In the late 90's, Microsoft was no longer cool for end users, but for developers and their associated sales force, they sure were. Devs were EXCITED to use MS's development tools and languages (VB/C++/Interdev/etc.). It was cheap to get started, plus there were a ton of resources for cheap training. SQL Server had easy hooks into all of the MS stuff, and watching a five minute demo on linking a SQL Server db to your web app was powerful. A new generation of IT admins preferred Windows NT's GUI to command line Solaris/Irix/AIX/etc. This was all backed by the ease of becoming a Microsoft partner, which would mean a steady flow of sales leads to your shop. For better or worse, their technologies revolutionized a whole generation of developers who thought MS was cool. First they had cool tools when others were stagnant and relying upon their entrenched position to keep up sales. Then they used shady, anti-competitive tactics to keep that position.
All I'm saying is that they were perceived as cool at one point. I'm also saying that I'm glad that era looks to be over.
(1) Good on them for going closed source. ... If Makerbot is going closed source all the way, that may be enough of a push to get me to buy something else.
5)
Wait... what? So, let me paraphrase: "Yay on closed source! Now, get out of my way while I find something open source..."
Entitlement Generation? I must have missed the part where the poster said something about expecting it for free.
Even with its flaws, I'm thankful to have a fast Internet connection at all. But it could be much better.
I know this won't help the OP now, but If you live in a disaster-prone area and you could ever be hours away from a sudden evac, consider setting up your hardware as if you were doing a mobile installation. 19" rack cabinets on casters, which can be quickly pushed to a truck. Note: just because you have wheels on your rack doesn't mean they're meant to be moved when loaded down with equipment. But the appropriate equipment. If you want to see something like this in action, go to a major televised sporting event a couple of days before the event starts and ask nicely to talk to the tech manager.
If "el-cheapo" refers to MVNO operators like Virgin, Boost, Page Plus, etc., they're cheaper, but they're just resellers of the big four. As soon as they're seen as a threat, their carriers will up their wholesale costs and MVNOs will be forced to charge rates matching the carriers they're reselling.
But why does this announcement surprise anyone? Let's not forget, the subscribers are not the customers -- the shareholders are. Until there's a carrier where those two parties are one and the same, the subscribers will always, always be on the losing end of the deal.
They're telling me to bring the ID, not that they're going to record the info from my ID. If they simply want to *look* at my ID, e.g. to verify that I'm the purchaser, that's fine with me. Entering that info into their database(s) is NOT fine with me.
It's high time that USA also gets "All sales are final" rules, like most of the world. Having people return fully working items that then have to be sold cheap drives up prices for all of us who don't play that game.
Liberal return policies make customers more likely to buy items due to the perceived safety net of said policy, resulting in greater sales, driving down prices for all of us. Plus, restocking fees exist expressly to discourage those who "borrow" items. The only time ID should be requested is when the customer cannot present a receipt.
You're talking about using NTSC/PAL analog video here -- which is completely inadequate if you'd need to actually identify someone. Even if you're lucky enough to get the perps face(s) looking straight into the camera (which you won't -- the angle you're going to have the cameras at will make it more than likely their faces will be covered by a baseball cap or something), there just isn't enough going to be the resolution necessary to be able to ID them, especially with cheap cameras from DX over long runs of cat5. Maybe IP cameras at higher resolution would be better? Just don't cheap out with low end toys (e.g. the Dlink DCS-903L I have has disappointed me).
Best Buy recently bought MindShift, a managed service provider (e.g. mail hosting, "cloud" services, etc.). I promptly "shifted" myself away from them -- no way in hell I'm going to let Best Buy host my email! But this just goes to show you that they're going to be making themselves over as a services company. It's only a matter of time before they purchase Sprint or T-Mobile.
B&H's salesforce won't give you the time of day until you're ready to spend $5k+. I could barely get them to point me to the right end of the store, never mind answer questions I had, when I was after a $100 item. I can only imagine they'd simply stop talking to you and walk away if you mentioned the words "price match". Personally, I'll never do business with them again. They are the definition of a pre-sales showroom in my book.
Consider holding the video conference using the lowest-common-denominator, e.g. Skype, but having the remote party also record it locally using a higher quality codec with standalone video recording app. Once the interview is over, have the remote party compress the file (Handbrake is easy to use, even for non-tech minded) and transfer it using conventional means (FTP, etc.). Though this might mean you'd need two cameras at the remote location (unless you have a way to split a video device to two different apps), it will eliminate network bottlenecks, latency, and resolution constraints.
I was thinking the same thing about Speex, but...
From Wikipedia:
Since Speex was designed for Voice over IP (VoIP) instead of cell phone use, the codec must be robust to lost packets, but not to corrupted ones.
Granted, It's not x86, and the cpu is significantly slower, but with h.264 accelerated decoding, HDMI, small footprint, low cost ($25/$35 for the board!), a focus on Linux support (and therefore, hopefully, robust drivers), and boot from SD, the Raspberry Pi should be able to put a serious dent into Via's HTPC market. It has a LOT of potential, and this is only a 1st gen device.
Let IBM's Watson analyze the interview for a while to come out with the killer app for the iPhone 5: Stevie. It's just like Siri, expect now YOU'RE the personal assistant.
So if it's the oxygen we need to worry about destroying our optical media, how about storing discs in a case which we can fill with something that's not oxygen? Better yet, a light-tight, insulated container with a mechanism to replace the oxygen with, what, nitrogen or something. Would this solve the problem of degrading DVDs?
Zimbra is owned by VMWare now. They have a history of providing free versions of their software (e.g. VMWare Player, ESXi free), so that's a good sign. But I still feel that it's a strange fit.