Slashdot Mirror


After Petition, Farscape Miniseries Trailer Online

Myrmi writes "The four-hour Farscape miniseries will be aired on the Sci-Fi Channel starting October 17th. The trailer for the miniseries is to be hosted at Apple Trailers and starting today at 3PM EST." Here's the trailer page. As eve11 writes, "Apple.com agreed to host the trailer after a write-in campaign from Farscape fans. Until today this trailer had only been shown during the July 24th Farscape panel at Comicon in San Diego. More info here."

46 of 224 comments (clear)

  1. Bad News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sci-Fi says despite thousands of people wanting to see the trailer, they're going to have to cancel it.

    1. Re:Bad News by Kryxan · · Score: 3, Informative

      True, Sci-Fi channel shows way too much crap now. cant they save that for the middle of the night when everyone knows that nothing good will be on TV anyway? i dont care if i see re-runs of old sci-fi shows all the time, at least make it sci-fi, not random B movie about some giant insects or whatnot. i remember getting cable just so i could watch sci-fi, now its just another channel that i sometimes watch.

  2. Will this be worth watching? by Matt+Perry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Will this be worth watching for someone who's never seen Farscape? I've heard good things about Farscape but never bothered to watch it as I knew the story wouldn't be completed due to the cancellation of the series. Does any hardcore Farscape fan know if this mini-series will stand on its own or expect me to have watched Farscape before to understand what's happening?

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    1. Re:Will this be worth watching? by Robotech_Master · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, the narration that opens the trailer seems to suggest they're going to do a "The story thus far" segment. I'm pretty sure that if they want to attract viewership, they'll do something of that nature.

      I don't doubt that there will be more rewards for those who have watched the entire series than those who haven't, but they'd be stupid not to try to reach out to new audiences. This is, after all, the last chance they have to build a bigger audience and show they're worthy of being brought back for another year.

      Either way, if you'd like to catch up on everything that's ever happened in the series so you'll have a better idea what's going on in the movie, there's always the Farscape Primer.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    2. Re:Will this be worth watching? by IEEEMonkey · · Score: 4, Informative

      I bet, as with most of the Babylon 5 movies, that there is enough of an explanation to make it interesting for someone who has never seen the series. I would suggest, being a fan of the show, that you rent it and watch the show. The first four seasons can be rented from www.netflix.com.

    3. Re:Will this be worth watching? by dinodipp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know much about the plot of the mini-series but you are given the basic premisis of the series in this trailer for the mini series soo i think you would be able to follow it. I'm speculating ofcourse but it would be pretty stupid to alinate new viewers and i think they will do a pretty good job setting the story up. Hopefully without ruining it for the hardcore fans

    4. Re:Will this be worth watching? by Digital_Quartz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Watching the entire series is 100% worth the time. I had just finished the end of season 2 when the series was cancelled (we get Sci-Fi channel stuff a little slowly up here in Canada, since we don't get the Sci-Fi channel). I watched it through to the end, and I'm very glad I did.

      You should keep in mind when I say this that I watch next to no television at all. Farscape was a truly unique series.

    5. Re:Will this be worth watching? by LilMikey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, if you even jump in the middle of the series you're kinda going to be lost. I started watching it about a year ago by renting the DVDs from netflix in order. My netflix account expired so now I'm only catching the reruns and with a plethora of new characters, sub-plots, and storylines I'm decently confused. Hell, the last episode had a new character I've never seen on the ship, no Moya or Pilot, a dead guy invading the mind of the main character, and 2 good guys trying to kill each other in a cartoon?

      Let's hope they have some kind of summation before they really get into it.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    6. Re:Will this be worth watching? by Nos. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think this is the issue a lot of movie makers run into. How much do you focus on new viewers and how much do you focus on those that already know the storyline/environment? This has been an issue with a lot of movies including LotR.. Jackson had to balance boring the long time fans of the books with those that had never read them. Its a tough balance to reach for anyone.

    7. Re:Will this be worth watching? by deranged+unix+nut · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you watch episodes out-of-order, you will get a bad experience. You want to watch them in-order, or else pick a season and watch it start to finish.

      That said, this is a unique show that is well worth watching.

    8. Re:Will this be worth watching? by Photar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ask for people's opinion get modded interesting, state one of your own and get modded troll. Interesting :)

      --
      He who knows not and knows he knows not is a wise man. He who knows not and knows not he knows not is a fool.
    9. Re:Will this be worth watching? by jwkane · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Revenging Angel", Season 3 Episode 16

      A great episode. You've indicated the one real flaw in Farscape that even die-hard fans have to acknowledge. Many of the episodes are hard to understand unless you've seen all the earlier shows.

      With so many of the Farscape episodes as 2 or 3 part it isn't something they could have fixed without dumbing down the plot.

      On the meta-plot axis; you have the weak meta-plot shows like Star Trek (orig and NG), single plot threads (voyager) and multiple plot threads (DS9, B5 and Farscape).

      The stronger the meta-plot the harder it will be for a new viewer to "get" the show. Some shows are worth the effort (Farscape); some are not (DS9 }:> ).

    10. Re:Will this be worth watching? by deranged+unix+nut · · Score: 2, Informative

      Having a TiVo helped me quite a bit when watching farscape. I watched the first episode and was religiously hooked to it ever since. When I would go on vacation or for some reason wasn't home when the episode aired, I could always still see it in order using my TiVo.

      As far as the alien words go, I don't think they ever say what some of the words are, but after a while you do get the gist of their meanings.

      It is a bit of a soap opera, but it is also a mind-warp and a lot more intelligent than many other sci-fi shows. Take for example how the translator microbes do a fine job on straightforward statements, but they get analogies and comparisons completely wrong. Things like that make it very interesting to me.

  3. petitions actually work? by obli · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought petitioning was a way to raise the hope for people by making them feel like they actually were doing something to help, I'd never think they'd make a difference. Well, it's always nice to hear about a succeeded one :)

  4. False Causation Link by RobertB-DC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Apple.com agreed to host the trailer after a write-in campaign from Farscape fans.

    I RTFA'd, but I don't see the direct link implied in the summary. Event A (write-in campaign) happened before Event B (trailer is available), but I don't see any evidence that Event A caused Event B.

    But then, it's nice to feel like you have a voice. They held elections in the old USSR... or should that be, "In Soviet Russia, Elections hold YOU!" ?

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:False Causation Link by Otter · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, someone understands the difference between correlation and cause? Apparently you're overqualified to be a Harvard researcher or a JAMA editor.

    2. Re:False Causation Link by thelexx · · Score: 4, Informative

      From a chat with Brian Henson:

      ( ChatMod) (Nessus) to (ChatQ): Where did the funding for the mini come from?

      ( BrianH) It came from a consortium of financers who would not have heard of us if it weren't for all of the attention the fans bought to the cancelling of the series.
      ( BrianH) So thanks to all of you, the mini series was funded

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    3. Re:False Causation Link by eve11 · · Score: 2, Informative

      A few people had emailed the folks at apple.com and asked to see the trailer there after comicon. Apple.com said something about talking with the Sci-Fi channel (they actually don't usually host TV trailers) -- but actually it was Henson who owned the trailer. The staff at www.watchfarscape.com (I am also a staff member) brought the folks at apple up to speed on who owned what, and encouraged site members to write in to apple.com telling them about their desire to see the trailer. After a week of such emails and negotiations, Apple.com announced it would host the trailer.

      If you'd like to argue with me about causation, I can pull MS statistician-going-on-PhD on you and start talking counterfactuals and Directed acyclic graphs, but I'd rather not.

  5. SweeeT by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Funny
    All I need now is for Farscape and Firefly to come back in full-time series, and TV would be good again.

    Of course, nothing will ever fill the hole that 'Suddenly Susan' has left in my heart.

  6. How Does Apple Profit? by idonotexist · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've seen many movie trailers on Apple.com and I'm sure many others have too. Certainly this media is not gentle bandwidth usage.

    How does Apple profit? Do studios pay Apple to have trailers on its site?

    --
    "There ought to be limits to freedom"
    1. Re:How Does Apple Profit? by errtega · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apple profits mainly because you have to use QuickTime(tm) to watch the trailers. Someone wants to watch something on Apple Trailers and they don't have QuickTime? Well, they have two options. Either don't watch or get QuickTime. BAM! They have a new QuickTime user. There are individual user licenses that you can buy to make QuickTime more functional (QuickTime Pro), but what Apple is looking for is marketshare. The more QuickTime users, the more businesses/companies/media outfits notice and use the QuickTime format.

    2. Re:How Does Apple Profit? by pknoll · · Score: 4, Insightful
      How does Apple profit? Do studios pay Apple to have trailers on its site?

      By selling QuickTime.

      You can get the player for free, but it's the "foot in the door". The more interesting things you can do only with the full version, like authoring and so forth, and movie previews at Apple have become the de facto way of viewing trailers online.

      Pretty good push for their player software.

    3. Re:How Does Apple Profit? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      >Quicktime penetration is the benefit Apple reaps.

      Wouldn't it be cheaper just to buy us all dinner and some flowers?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    4. Re:How Does Apple Profit? by nine-times · · Score: 4, Funny
      Quicktime penetration is the benefit Apple reaps.

      Wise you are, master Yoda, and well you speak.

    5. Re:How Does Apple Profit? by sootman · · Score: 2, Funny

      quicktime penetration... there's a joke in there somewhere. :-)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  7. IRC Information by KILNA · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those of you who popped in to irc.scifi.com during the campaign to get the show back on the air, that server has gone the way of the dodo. Many folks have ended up at #scapers on irc.scifi-fans.net and alternately #farscape on irc.chorn.com. Happy yakking!

    --
    Error: PANTS NOT FOUND. Press <F1> to continue.
  8. Direct large version link by Universal+Nerd · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Ash nazg durbatuluk, ash nazg gimbatul Ash nazg thrakatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul
  9. Farscape jumped the shark.. by KenFury · · Score: 2, Insightful

    when Scorpius joined the crew. I could go along with Crais, a bit of a stretch but who knows. Since then the show has gotten bigger. Bigger effects, bigger story arc, more extreme characters, every thing but better writing. Sorry guys you lost me somewhere around mid season 3..

    1. Re:Farscape jumped the shark.. by vsprintf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      [Farscape jumped the shark] when Scorpius joined the crew.

      He didn't exactly "join" the crew, unless you think that being kept in confinement or under supervision is *joining*. It was a matter of mutual survival with a number of sub-plots. The one involving Jool was probably a red herring, but we never got to find out. Strange alliances are Farscape's forte. Scorpius was still after John's knowledge, and John knew it, which led to the whole sniffing-drugs-to-forget-Aeryn thing (pause for a breath) because John knew Scorpius would use Aeryn and their baby-to-be as leverage against them.

      There were some strange episodes, but it was the most innovative SciFi on TV - if you didn't keep up, you got lost. Farscape didn't try to tell stories that could only fit into an hour, nor did it waste a half hour bringing you up to speed every episode. I found it continually interesting and enjoyable, and I haven't paid any attention to the Horror (SciFi) Channel since they dropped it.

  10. I just hope they don't ignore the last cliffhanger by kalirion · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's only a single line in the entire trailer that might possibly be referring the the last season's cliffhanger. I really hope they do a good job of resolving it, as opposed to a cop-out quick fix (you know, the kind that Misery chick hated.)

  11. Re:I dont remember by Thieron · · Score: 3, Informative

    The lady in black is "Commander Cleavage" or basically, a high ranking peacekeeper that took Scorpi's command away from him. She has some hypnotic ability with chemicals she excretes to control males.

    The big blue baddie is one of the top, if not the top, Scarran.

  12. Re:Only played during comic con? by Lordrashmi · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, much different trailer. Pretty good in fact.

  13. You can watch the series first by cat_jesus · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Gear up for the new miniseries by watching all 88 episodes of Farscape, airing in order every weekday from 9AM-4PM ET/PT, Oct. 1 through Oct. 15"

    This is when a DVR comes in handy. I'm glad I bumped up the storage on my Tivo.

  14. Re:Bizarro World by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Funny

    Lost in Space was muppets.

    Oh wait, that was Pigs in Space. NM.

    (Still it had much better writing and way better SFX than FarScape)

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  15. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you regard the rule of thumb for movies, "The better the trailer is, the more likely that is all there is." I have pretty high hopes for the actual miniseries. The trailer was kind of rough but based on the original production team still producing this series I anticipate these four hours to be golden.

    I have seen some really bad trailers for really good movies. I have seen some really cool trailers for really crappy movies.

  16. New theme music! by ChuckleBug · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow - they finally found the right theme music! Nice lyrics:

    It's time to play the music
    It's time to light the lights
    it's time to meet the Muppets on the Farscape Show tonight.

    It's time to put on makeup
    It's time to dress up right
    It's time to raise the curtain on the Farscape Show tonight.

    1. Re:New theme music! by LordNimon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Are you talking about this?

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  17. Irony: But I don't WANT to see the trailer... by the_skywise · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I love the story so much I don't want to be teased by it. I KNOW it's going to be good, I know it's going to have suprises. I don't want any hints, I want to savor it as I experience it!

    That has to say something about its quality.

    Of course, Sci-fi will cancel it when they see the low trailer hits...

  18. Cut to the chase... by billimad · · Score: 2, Funny

    will there be any alien boobs in this?

  19. Direct download link by david.given · · Score: 4, Informative
    3 MB low-resolution download
    6 MB medium-resolution download
    18 MB high-resolution download

    Needed to poke around inside the original .mov with a hex editor to get them, too...

  20. Re:Behold the power of the internet. by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That wasn't fans writing in, that was DVD sales.

  21. Re:Any Farscape is good Farscape... by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If Chrichton can walk away from being a metal statue with its head ripped off, he can walk away from this.

  22. It's more than just the Quicktime Player by green+pizza · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can get the player for free, but it's the "foot in the door". The more interesting things you can do only with the full version, like authoring and so forth, and movie previews at Apple have become the de facto way of viewing trailers online.

    It's more than just Quicktime, it's the Quicktime-based pro apps (and G5 hardware) that Apple wants to promote.

    Quicktime (which is an extensive media framework which happens to also include a [somewhat crappy] Quicktime media player) is free for users and developers alike. Apple also sells a "Quicktime Pro" package, which is little more than a beefed up Quicktime media player for converting, editing, and exporting several media types. Back in the Mac OS Classic days, there were many third party Quicktime movie players that provided many extra features, but still used Apple's Quicktime framework to do the heavy lifting. I don't know of any (good) players for Windows or Mac OS X, so it seems Apple has been stepping in with their "Quicktime Pro" player for $30.

    Getting back to my initial point, Apple is promoting their name and their Quicktime framework to sell products like FinalCutPro, DVD Studio Pro, and Shake. They're also using it to help promote other similar tools, such as the iLife suite (iDVD, iMovie, iTunes, iPhoto, and Garage Band). But these apps are only available for Apple's hardware and OS, and iLife happens to be included free of charge on new Macs.

    So, yes, Apple is hosting their mega awesome huge trailer site for a reason, and they are making some money off their deluxe "pro" Quicktime Player. But it's the big fish they're after, they want to promote their brand and technology to sell G5s and FinalCutPro/Shake/DVD Studio Pro class software.

  23. Now to really throw them for a loop... by Tom7 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... Boycott!!

  24. Re:Behold the power of the internet. by Cyberllama · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fox took notice when they saw that a BASIC CABLE show was beating Letterman in the ratings in males 18-30 demographic (aka, the demographic that advertisers pay the most for). It's pretty impressive when something on cable beats something on network tv. . .

    The cartoon network ratings, coupled with the fact that Family guy season one box set was the best selling dvd in the country at the time made it so obvious that even FOX executives had to realize they'd been morons not to renew it in the first place.

  25. Re:Any Farscape is good Farscape... by Cyberllama · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Could be lots of things, Here are the theories I think hold the most water:

    1) The "weapon" is actually just a device used to capture. The "victim" converted into red dust in one place and he reassembles elsewhere.

    2) Pilot has John's wormhole knowledge now, so he takes the crew back in time and they prevent the entire nasty incident from happening -- though I have no idea how they can do this without creating an "unrealized reality".

    3) Something else.

    The point is, there are many many good ways to resolve that without resorting to "it was all a dream".