Slashdot Mirror


Internet Meltdown Predicted for Tomorrow

Kobalt writes "A few news services are reporting that Russian computer expert, Aleksandr Gostev from Kaspersky Labs, has predicted that a large chunk of the Internet will be shut down tomorrow by cyber terrorists."

106 of 914 comments (clear)

  1. google..... by Ziak · · Score: 5, Funny

    as long as google dosen't go down we can live on the caches!!!!!

    --
    Loading Please Wait....
    1. Re:google..... by SoSueMe · · Score: 4, Funny

      Anybody got a mirror?

    2. Re:google..... by Iamthefallen · · Score: 5, Funny

      And just in case it does go down, here's the google cache for it.

      --
      Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
    3. Re:google..... by epsalon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mirror here

    4. Re:google..... by PingPongBoy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe it's better to have it down. Then I'll start looking at all my saved pages.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    5. Re:google..... by j_rhoden · · Score: 5, Funny

      Anyone else find the fact that it still says "Google is not affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content." on that page amusing?

    6. Re:google..... by amerinese · · Score: 3, Insightful

      50% of people are NOT dumber than the average person. Think distributions with heavy tails, such as the wealth distribution--a few people are really, really rich, bumping the average up, but having no effect on the dense middle part of the distribution. 50% of people are dumber than the median person, and such a person does not exist if the set has an even (non-odd) population.

    7. Re:google..... by L.+VeGas · · Score: 5, Funny

      50% of people are more irritating than the average person.

    8. Re:google..... by Uber+Banker · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey... no need to worry, just download the intraweb onto a couple of CDs. I just used PKZIP and managed to fit it only my MP3 player.

    9. Re:google..... by red+floyd · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, but my daughter is busy admiring herself in it right now.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    10. Re:google..... by dtfinch · · Score: 3, Funny

      49% of people are dumber than most.

    11. Re:google..... by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 3, Funny

      You laugh but I used to work at the computer lab for Florida State U. anyway before all the dorms got ethernet and you had to come to the computer lab and make a copy of the dial up networking software and othet software like eudora etc. Anyway People would walk in and show me their 5 3.5 floppies and ask what they needed to do to copy the internet to their disks.

      I would respond with "first off, your going to need more disks"

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    12. Re:google..... by xlcus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It will mirror any site for you...

      Just stick ".mirror.sytes.org" as the end of a domain name.

      e.g. http://www.google.com.mirror.sytes.org/

    13. Re:google..... by severoon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't know about wealth distribution...I think you probably should have went with the light bulb example. For those of you who don't know this, this will be an interesting contribution to this OT discussion. :)

      When you buy a light bulb, the packaging says, "average lifetime 1000 hours". Are you likely to get 1000 hours out of your light bulb, then? No, in fact it is very unlikely. Why's that?

      As it happens, light bulb filaments are finicky creatures. They will virtually burn forever if there are no microscopic defects in them and the amount of air inside the bulb is below a certain amount. Slight imperfections in the filament cause hot spots, and those hot spots in the presence of even a slightly higher-than-normal amount of air burn several times hotter than the rest of the filament, significantly shortening the life time of the bulb. When a "freak" comes out that is nearly microscopically perfect, the heat is evenly distributed across the entire filament and the lifetime can be hundreds or thousands of times longer than the lowest 99%. So, by including these outliers in the averages that only make up 1%, but live potentially thousands of times longer, the bulb companies are able to say that the average lifespan of the bulb is 1000 hours when actually it's probably closer to 600 hours, and it's completely true.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    14. Re:google..... by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 5, Informative

      You mean like this one?

      This bulb, in a fire station in Livermore, CA, has been burning since 1901.

      Constantly.

      One hundred three years.

      Here's the webcam.

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    15. Re:google..... by stienman · · Score: 4, Funny

      And in case that goes down, here's the cache of the cache of google: http://google.com/search?q=cache:www.google.com/se arch?q=cache:www.google.com

      It's not currently cached, though, so I submitted several times so Google gets it on its next search of its search of its search engine.

      Once it goes through, we really ought to do it again for a fourth level of redundancy.

      -Adam

    16. Re:google..... by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Funny
      Just goes to show that they don't make 'em like they used to. And if tens of thousands of Cisco routers come crashing down tomorrow, it will just go to show that they do. :-)

      Sorry, couldn't resist a little on-topic humor....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    17. Re:google..... by ReTay · · Score: 4, Funny

      "50% of people are NOT dumber than the average person"

      You have never worked tech support have you?

    18. Re:google..... by GlamdringLFO · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have just downloaded a *LOT* of pr0n.

      --
      Skal! AMS
    19. Re:google..... by MoogMan · · Score: 3, Funny

      50% of people are NOT dumber than the average person.

      Well, erm... obviously.

  2. Which tomorrow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Could they be a bit clearer on which TZ they're basing the attack? For me, it's already "tomorrow" in Japan.

    1. Re:Which tomorrow? by ZoneGray · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, according to the eWeek article, it may or may not be tomorrow, it may or may not be related to cyber-terrorism, it may or may not happen at all, and it may or may not be simply an excuse for a security company to get some free publicity. Other than that, I think the report was as clear as possible.

      I may or may not go harden my servers in preparation.

    2. Re:Which tomorrow? by teeker · · Score: 5, Funny

      it may or may not be tomorrow, it may or may not be related to cyber-terrorism, it may or may not happen at all, and it may or may not be simply an excuse for a security company to get some free publicity.

      Well then, it meets all the requirements.....time to raise the national terror alert to ORANGE! w00t!

      --
      teeker
    3. Re:Which tomorrow? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 4, Funny
      Could they be a bit clearer on which TZ they're basing the attack? For me, it's already "tomorrow" in Japan.

      I was under the impression everyone used the standard time zone EST5EDT. Are you saying there are places in the world that don't? That seems kind of silly to me. Since Washington, D.C. is the capital of the free world I propose that all world citizens use EST5EDT as their time zone for consistency.

  3. Pure craziness by MinusBlindfold · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How can they know? unless they are somehow involved.....

    1. Re:Pure craziness by BarryNorton · · Score: 3, Funny
      How can they know? unless they are somehow involved.....
      Well...
      Gostev said that the information on the attack could be found on "specialist web sites" although at the time of going to press the INQ couldn't find them.
      ... but that might be because many of those "specialist web sites" are subscription-only ;)
  4. Sure, blame everything on terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He just wants to sell you his anti-virus!

  5. Another terror alert? by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    I smell the work of the GOP trying to get the geek vote.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:Another terror alert? by spellraiser · · Score: 5, Informative
      Seriously, this all sound very, very fishy. All the stories given are quite short, both in length and on details. For instance, Moscow News reports this:

      Speaking at a conference hosted by Russian Information Agency Novosti, Aleksandr Gostev from Kaspersky Labs said information on this terrorist attack was published on special websites. He did not elaborate.

      ...

      The executive director of Dr.Web antivirus lab, Mikhail Bychinsky, quoted by Lenta.ru web agency said he had not heard of such an attack. "I do not believe in mass internet attacks because the main servers are defended, and Kaspersky Labs has been foretelling doomsday for a long time."

      A case of cry wolf, most likely. The main question is 'Why the hell?'

      --
      I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
    2. Re:Another terror alert? by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 4, Funny

      The prophet has no honour in his own land? They are probably right.

      Did you see this other link on that page? Sometimes Reading TFA has unexpected benefits :-)

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    3. Re:Another terror alert? by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Kaspersky can't even seem to put together a decent antivirus program. We used to use it at my place of employment - when it originally came out it was quite good, possibly the best scanner for NT. Then it went right in the fucking toilet and became basically unusable. I wouldn't trust this guy to tell me that chili cheese fritos taste good when you're stoned.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Another terror alert? by slaker · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you're thinking like that, can I at least remind you that you'll also be voting to maintain assholes like Ashcroft, Cheney and Rumsfeld in their respective offices?

      I mean, there were at least five other guys in the primary I think would've been better candidates, but it really scares me to think that the wastes of orgasms presently holding the highest offices in our country might get to do it for another four years just because the mainstream democrats had to choose the fucking establishment candidate.

      But then, since I live in one of the NASCAR idiot redneck states that will overwhelming go to Prince George, I think maybe I'll vote for Nader, too. Or maybe Cthulhu.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    5. Re:Another terror alert? by slaker · · Score: 5, Funny

      And since I'm now apparently a "troll", I'd like to go on to point out that in the 2004 Presidential Election, Cthulhu is not, in fact, the greatest evil in the running, ancient and all-devouring though he may be.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
  6. Care to define that? by Lethyos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Can someone seriously tell me what a "cyber terrorist" is? Is it someone who makes threats using electronic media? Is it someone who defaces web sites? Is it someone who shuts down the Internet? Are the latter two here really forms of terrorism? I don't really know of anyone who is "terrorized" by defaced web sites and high lag times, but I could be wrong.

    --
    Why bother.
    1. Re:Care to define that? by shades66 · · Score: 5, Funny

      > Is it someone who makes threats using electronic media?

      no thats the RIAA isn't it?

      --
      ---- There are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand binary and those that don't
    2. Re:Care to define that? by tekunokurato · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's anyone who disrupts business interests, isn't that obvious?

      Oh wait, I'm a banker, I'm not supposed to say things like that...

    3. Re:Care to define that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've personally become entirely jaded by the term 'terrorist'. I've heard it used to describe just about everything that the speaker wants to scare you into believing.

      Officials of foreign governments are now terrorists, drinking a Pepsi at the Olympics is "advertising terrorism", etc.

    4. Re:Care to define that? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It's the same definition as any other terrorist. "Any person doing something that upsets my personal interests".

      As Reagan said; one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter.

    5. Re:Care to define that? by Senzei · · Score: 3, Funny
      Can someone seriously tell me what a "cyber terrorist" is?

      Its that jackass that won't get off the mic in counter-strike, unreal tournament, and any other game in which they can spam endless chatter without a chance of retribution.

      --
      Slashdot: Where anecdotes and generalizations can be freely substituted for facts, logic, or intelligence
    6. Re:Care to define that? by Khomar · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I don't really know of anyone who is "terrorized" by defaced web sites and high lag times, but I could be wrong.

      If the Internet is your livelyhood, then the threat of being shutdown or defaced (thereby damaging your company's reputation) is very real. While it is not life-threatening, a successful cyber attack could be very distruptive. If, for example, someone was able to shut down a large percentage of the Internet, what effect could that have on the US economy? It would not take long for serious repercussions on a world-wide scale due to loss of productivity.

      No, they are not terrorists in threatening people's lives, but if they can prove that they can hit the economy, they accomplish the same goal: to create fear. Remember, one of the goals of 9/11 was not just to kill people but to hurt the US economy. Is this something to be worried about? What kind of wide-spread damage could a "cyber-terrorist" cause on the Internet?

      BTW, I realize that this was a mis-quote, but it does bring up interesting questions.

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    7. Re:Care to define that? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 5, Funny

      >one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter.

      If a fire fighter fights fires, and a crime fighter fights crime, what is a "freedom fighter"?

    8. Re:Care to define that? by tuxette · · Score: 3, Funny
      Can someone seriously tell me what a "cyber terrorist" is?

      Yeah. A cyber terrorist is some teenage geek that messages you all the time with "ASL? R U HORNY?" so much and so often that you can't get anything done.

      --
      People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
    9. Re:Care to define that? by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 4, Funny

      As Reagan said; one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter.

      I always mess that one up. I thought he said "one mans terrorist is another mans customer."

    10. Re:Care to define that? by ThosLives · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It would not take long for serious repercussions on a world-wide scale due to loss of productivity.

      Hrm... but what about those instances where loss of the internet will increase productivity? For instance, I should be doing work right now...what if there's an interesting balance that happens (no internet hurts some folks, but helps others) such that the net effect is zero? And what's more important - net effect or effect for a given individual?

      Now there's a philosophical mind-bender...

      --
      "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
    11. Re:Care to define that? by socrates32 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When Communism fell and left Capitalism triumphant (apart from China, North Korea, Cuba...) it left a bogeyman vacuum, which didn't matter much as long as everyone was ranting about felacio in the Oral^H^H^H^H Oval Office. But now we're marketing a new Bad Guy (TM) that's just like the rest of us, only doesn't like Authority... convenient.

      --

      -- "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."
      - Whatever is said in Latin sounds profound.
    12. Re:Care to define that? by dedeman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The term "terrorist" has been applied just as much as former terms to try and convey a sense of evil and hate from the speaker to the recipient. The words "communist" and "nazi" are older examples, and are pretty much interchangeable unless the listener is actually what I call "informed".

    13. Re:Care to define that? by Hell+O'World · · Score: 5, Funny

      We HAVE to have the term terrorist, we aren't allowed to call everyone who disagrees with us "nazi" anymore.
      And if you don't agree, that's because you are a friggin terro-nazi.

    14. Re:Care to define that? by glpierce · · Score: 4, Informative

      "I assume Russians define it pretty much the same way."

      Don't be so sure. I took a terrorism class when I was in college, and we spent the first week or two discussing definitions of terrorism. The CIA, FBI, different dictionaries, different experts, different nations, etc., all have significantly different definitions. There are about a dozen definitions that scholarly papers regularly cite, making the word mostly useless when the definition isn't provided.

      --
      G
  7. Without the internet by MarkPNeyer · · Score: 5, Funny

    How will I be so productive at work ?

    oh... wait..

    --

    My blog
  8. Repent! by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 5, Funny

    Evil bits! There is still time to mend your ways! Repent, evil bits, for the hour of your doom is at hand!

    --
    SAILING MISHAP
  9. In other news... by RedShoeRider · · Score: 4, Funny

    We're going to slashdot the entire internet?

    --

    Chris Knight is my hero.

    1. Re:In other news... by jannic · · Score: 3, Funny

      You got it - they'll just post a link to the dns root servers on slashdot...

  10. e-jihad perhaps? by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 4, Interesting

    SANS internet storm center has a note on this. They have seen increased scriptkiddie activity possibly leading up to this. Started on Sunday. Also read the note on the "drag-n-drop" exploit that is now seen in the wild and only requires you to move the scrollbar for it to install....several scanners are not picking up some of the new binaries being installed.

    1. Re:e-jihad perhaps? by slungsolow · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They do make a valid point about the college kids going back to school with those unsecure boxes and fat pipes.

      God I hates sluts and jocks.

  11. Ok, so no what? by ALeavitt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Armed with this foreknowledge, what can we do besides wait and see what happens? One of TFAs stated that there's really nothing we can do to defend against the attack, so what's the point in worrying about it? Either it will happen, and folks in the US and Western Europe will be inconvenienced, or it won't happen, and we'll all have worried for nothing. At this point, it seems like this knowledge, while nice to have, is somewhat useless.

    Also, why tomorrow? Wouldn't it send a more powerful message to wait a few weeks and do it on September 11th?

    --
    This sig has been stolen. Return it to its original user for a reward.
    1. Re:Ok, so no what? by jewf1sh · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also, why tomorrow?

      Obviously it's because August 26 is Macaulay Culkin's birthday. Everyone knows terrorists are big fans of the Home Alone movies, though not the third one.

    2. Re:Ok, so no what? by LearnToSpell · · Score: 3, Funny

      They made a THIRD one?! Jesus, no wonder they hate us.

    3. Re:Ok, so no what? by micromoog · · Score: 4, Funny
      One of TFAs stated that there's really nothing we can do to defend against the attack, so what's the point in worrying about it?

      Shhh, you might reveal the pointlessness of the Department of Homeland Security!

  12. solution.. by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 4, Funny

    NO! don't let them anywhere NEAR the internet's power switch!

  13. Death of Internet predicted, film at 11 by gclef · · Score: 5, Informative
    The Kapersky folks have already started disavowing the statements that are attributed to them. Apparently this is a big case of sensationalism (surprise, surprise). NtBugTraq forwarded on the Kapersky statement on it, which had this useful bit of info:
    Kaspersky is not predicting the end of the Internet tomorrow - or even in the near future. The story stems from brief comments made yesterday at a press conference which was dedicated to cybercrime and the problems of spam.

    At this press conference, Kaspersky commented that the possibility of terrorists using the Internet as a tool to attack certain countries was a reality. As an example, he cited the fact that a number of Arabic and Hebrew language websites contained an announcement of an 'electronic jihad' against Israel, to start on 26th August 2004.

    In an interview today, Kaspersky stressed that such information was not necessarily trustworthy. 'We don't know who is behind these statements.' He went on to clarify: 'It's not the first time the term 'electronic jihad' has been used. We've seen this before, with the focus being on sending racist emails, and defacing and hacking Israeli web sites. But it is the first time I have seen sites encouraging the use of Internet attacks against one country as a form of terrorism.'


    Summary: nothing to see here. Move along.
  14. In other news: by Stradenko · · Score: 4, Insightful
    A coordinated online strike against Internet servers by terrorists, dubbed "electronic jihad," may or may not strike this week


    The sun may or may not go nova this week.

    I may or may not get myself a real girlfriend.

    there may or may not be dupes posted on our beloved /.

    Kevin Mitnick may or may not like chicken.

    You may or may not get that raise (job, for those unemployed) this week.

    It's easy to make
  15. Many more SSH login attempts by yebb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Has anyone else noticed a lot of automated (presumably) login attempts for the users 'root', 'test' and 'guest' over SSH?

    I never used to get this, and now I seem to get dozens of them every day.
    I wonder if this is related to the so called "dooms-day" tomorrow.

    1. Re:Many more SSH login attempts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      Just me. Sorry. If you would please just reset your root password to something easier to guess, I won't have to keep cluttering up your log so much.

      Thanks in advance!

    2. Re:Many more SSH login attempts by JawzX · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As a matter of fact a customer of mine was recently probed and her dsl (verizon) router was temp. seized by an IP originating in China... First time I've ever seen that. Changed her password, stealthed all ports, updated firmware, no problems since, but stange nontheless.

    3. Re:Many more SSH login attempts by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 4, Informative

      >Has anyone else noticed a lot of automated (presumably) login attempts for the users 'root', 'test' and 'guest' over SSH?

      That started last month. It's a routine rootkit installer. One report is that in addition to trying for stupid passowrds it also attempts the overflow exploit from last year that got fixed in 3.7.1p2.

    4. Re:Many more SSH login attempts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
      From http://isc.sans.org/diary.php?date=2004-08-22:
      Joel Esler brought to our attention a new version of the brutessh code that has been posted and appears to match the scanning that we have been seeing lately. It appears that we finally have a solution to our mystery. Thanks for all the folks who submitted information and for everyone's time and effort that was put forth to coming up with a resolution!!
    5. Re:Many more SSH login attempts by Rufus211 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I just found they're done by a program called brutessh2. It's a little brute-force scanner like everyone has guessed. You can find the source for it here. Be sure to check your passwords against its password list.

  16. In other news... by Westech · · Score: 5, Funny

    Productivity tomorrow is expected to rise to levels not seen since the 1980's.

  17. I don't know about the Internet... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    But I can predict with 100% certainty that my eyes will meltdown in their sockets if they don't change the IT section color scheme soon.

  18. Sounds serious, maybe by cephyn · · Score: 4, Funny


    A coordinated online strike against Internet servers by terrorists, dubbed "electronic jihad," may or may not strike this week, security experts said.


    Well, I may or may not be concerned then.

    --
    Moo.
  19. Some alternate names by sczimme · · Score: 5, Funny


    e-had - a purely electronic holy war

    i-had - much like an e-had, but it's portable

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  20. Oh no! by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was supposed to do a major network re-configuration tomorrow, damn, now I'll get the blame for bringing down the whole internet!

    --
    A house divided against itself cannot stand.
  21. Damn! by pandrijeczko · · Score: 3, Funny

    I guess I'll have to stay up extra late tonight then in order to finish downloading the entire Internet onto my laptop...

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  22. Misquote/hype by Handyman · · Score: 5, Informative

    Kaspersky labs says they were misquoted. Quoting from a mail from kaspersky labs themselves (as found in a repost on the NTBugtraq mailing list):

    A handful of sites are stating that Eugene Kaspersky, founder of Kaspersky Labs, believes that tomorrow will bring a massive terrorist attack on the Internet. This is being quoted in a range of ways, ranging from factual reporting to citing the story as an example of cyber hysteria.

    However, Kaspersky is not predicting the end of the Internet tomorrow - or even in the near future. The story stems from brief comments made yesterday at a press conference which was dedicated to cybercrime and the problems of spam.

    At this press conference, Kaspersky commented that the possibility of terrorists using the Internet as a tool to attack certain countries as a reality. As an example, he cited the fact that a number of Arabic and Hebrew language websites contained an announcement of an 'electronic jihad' against Israel, to start on 26th August 2004.

    In an interview today, Kaspersky stressed that such information was not necessarily trustworthy. 'We don't know who is behind these statements.' He went on to clarify: 'It's not the first time the term 'electronic jihad' has been used. We've seen this before, with the focus being on sending racist emails, and defacing and hacking Israeli web sites. But it is the first time I have seen sites encouraging the use of Internet attacks against one country as a form of terrorism.'

    'As we've already stated many times in the past, it would be easy enough to use a network of infected computers to launch such an attack. We saw the impact that Sasser, Mydoom and Slammer had, on the Internet, businesses and organisations. Just imagine if such an attack was directed at one country or one critical point in the infrastructure of the Internet. Computers are a tool - and just like any tool, they can be used or misused.'

    Kaspersky emphasised that the likelihood of a massive attack directed against Israeli institutions tomorrow is low. However, he believes that Pandora's box has now been opened. Hackers and virus writers can be motivated by a range of factors: money, curiosity, or political
    conviction. But whatever their motivation, the insecure nature of the Internet and weak security precautions offer a wealth of opportunities. 'Maybe it won't be tomorrow, or the day after tomorrow - but sooner or later, terrorists will be using the Internet as another weapon in their arsenal.'

  23. Of Course They Did by VonGuard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Doesn't XP Service Pack 2 finally make its way onto Windows Auto-update tomorrow?

    --
    Don't Crease the Weasel!
  24. Re:Interesting timing.. by Have+Blue · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe the passengers upset with the terrorists' plans to crash them into the Internet.

  25. Re:Initial symptoms? by pclminion · · Score: 4, Insightful
    After seeing this story I'm beginning to wonder if perhaps I've begun to feel the initial symptoms of this attack...

    Don't jump to conclusions too quickly... The chances that somebody, somewhere on the planet is experiencing Internet-related problems on the same day as this was announced is pretty much 100%. It just so happens that you're the guy with the problems. Doesn't necessarily mean anything.

  26. Internet Meltdown by bsd4me · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's what happens if you put your swimsuit in the dryer for too long on high heat.

    --

    (S(SKK)(SKK))(S(SKK)(SKK))

  27. Internettrafficreport.com by GillBates0 · · Score: 5, Informative
    www.internettrafficreport.com is a one of the sites which gives a nice overview of the network throughputs across the globe (average response time, packetloss, etc).

    At about 12:15pm on the US east coast, it should be "tomorrow" soon in the Eastern continents. I'll keep a watch on the stats and flip the switch if necessary :P

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  28. Chicken Little Says by Alien54 · · Score: 3, Funny
    Run for your lifes! Run for your lifes!

    The sky, she is falling! The sky, she is falling!

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  29. Re:Interesting timing.. by whovian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    More like Microsoft releasing the service pack for Windows XP Professional via Windows Update/Automatic Update.

    SP2 has been available for a week or two (there was a link posted on Slashdot to the download page) to (I think) business and netadmins. My guess is that black hat hackers have found some holes and are perched to launch new exploits. That's the only meltdown I can conceive at the moment.

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  30. Guerilla Marketing by Kapersky Labs by cbelt3 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    According to Mosnews:

    "The executive director of Dr.Web antivirus lab, Mikhail Bychinsky, quoted by Lenta.ru web agency said he had not heard of such an attack. "I do not believe in mass internet attacks because the main servers are defended, and Kaspersky Labs has been foretelling doomsday for a long time.""

    Sounds like Kaspersky Labs is doing a bit of guerilla marketing on their own. "Subscribe to our pay sites and see when this 'attack' will take place !"

    I wonder if a 21st century chicken little would have sold newsletters instead of running around the barnyard.

    1. Re:Guerilla Marketing by Kapersky Labs by cbelt3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Excuse me, I spilled coffee all over myself laughing. Hmm- read our web site, download our trojan, which will ENABLE US to conduct our 'predicted attack' !!!

  31. Simple ... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Funny
    If a fire fighter fights fires, and a crime fighter fights crime, what is a "freedom fighter"?


    Donald Rumsfeld seems to fit into your progression.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  32. Re:Akamai, not Google..... by byolinux · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have developed a program to download Google to my hard disk. I have two (yes, two) ISDN lines, so I'll be fine to support the web for a week or so.

  33. Nothing will happen and you know this. by DroopyStonx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is this a story? Seriously... This is pure BS. You KNOW tomorrow will come and go and nothing will happen.

    Might as well report that the Apocalypse is supposed to happen sometime between 7 PM and 12 AM on Friday.

    Personally, I hope it does happen. There hasn't really been any interesting attacks since Code Red. I'm always looking forward to what attackers will come up with next.

    If they could actually cause a "meltdown", then that would be purely amazing.

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
  34. Earthlink - Ahead of the Curve! by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Since about midnight last night, Earthlink appears to be ahead of this "internet meltdown" curve. Their DSL service has been slow when it's working at all.

    What a service provider!

  35. XP SP2 by palndron · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe he is referring to the Windows Update release of XP SP2?

    --
    a man, a plan, a canal, panama
  36. Seriously....we need a "rim shot" mod.... by StressGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

    and it need not be limited to five.

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  37. Ha! by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 4, Funny

    Screw the net! I spend all my time on teh intarweb!

  38. Re:Things to do to prepare for this. by gregarican · · Score: 4, Funny

    My strategy will consist of a different approach:

    1) Do absolutely nothing.
    2) If anything happens tomorrow pull the plug on the DSL router we use for Internet access.
    3) Plug the router back in after a few hours.
    4) Repeat step 1.

  39. Finally! by mnewton32 · · Score: 5, Funny

    A story on /. that doesn't require you to RTFA! I think the headline on this site contained almost as much information as the linked stories did.

  40. This is a misquote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative


    It is explained clearly by Russ Cooper in this bugtraq post.

  41. Re:The sky is falling... Y2K pt. II by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 4, Funny

    With the AK, wouldn't you, technically, be playing a FPS, but with better graphics and sound?

    Careful, you're playing hardcore mode.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  42. ISC got another side by UnderAttack · · Score: 5, Funny

    I like the Internet Storm Center's comment about this "news". From today's
    diary:

    "The ISC would like to go out on a limb and predict that the Internet will not vaporize into a cloud of nothingness this Thursday, but if it does, it's been our pleasure to help stave off its inevitable annihilation this long."

    --
    ---- join dshield.org Distributed Intrusion Detec
  43. Baloney by theendlessnow · · Score: 3, Funny
    Aleksandr Gostev from Kaspersky Labs, has predicted that a large chunk of the Internet will be shut down tomorrow by cyber terrorists.

    It's just the stupid XP SP2 upgrade through Windows Auto Update. How somebody could confuse a Windows update with cyber terrorism is beyond me!

  44. Re:Reminds me of the old joke... by tanguyr · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you lined up all of the economists in the world, you still wouldn't reach a conclusion.
    Economists have successfully predicted nine of the last seven recessions.

    --
    #!/usr/bin/english
  45. ### The real threat ### by einhverfr · · Score: 3, Funny

    Someone has found This....

    No DON'T push that button...

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  46. Why post? by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 4, Funny

    If he's right, it's not like your comments will be modded up anyways.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  47. Re:Brilliant deduction! by jusdisgi · · Score: 5, Funny

    A *RUSSIAN* scientist spreading homeland security propaganda for an *AMERICAN* political party. You really put a lot of thought into that assertion, didn't you?

    One word: outsourcing.

    --
    Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
  48. Re:Awww man.... by MarkGriz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or better yet... hundreds of thousands of software developers, engineers and scientists will stop reading slashdot and will put in a full day of work, leading to incredible breakthroughs and soaring productivity.

    Ahhh, screw that! Let's have giant toga party instead.

    --
    Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  49. On Russian computer experts by MasTRE · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sounds to me like someone's had a bit too much vodka. Put the bottle down, Boris!

    --
    Must-not-watch TV!
  50. Re:Interesting timing.. by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'm sorry, but I've never understood how people get upset when people make light of a situation like this.

    The same reason they got upset on 9/11, and all the other times a tragedy has unnaturally ended lives, and for that matter when the life of someone they love has ended naturally: death is not funny, and making jokes out of it is likely to cause suffering to people who have already suffered enough. Is humanity really such a terribly old-fashioned virtue these days?

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  51. Oh for pity's sake!! At least get the facts right by Wapiti-eater · · Score: 5, Informative

    From: news@kaspersky.com [mailto:news@kaspersky.com]
    Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 10:29 AM
    To: news@kaspersky.com
    Subject: VirusList.com Virus Alerts & Virus News: 25th August 2004: Who knows what tomorrow will bring?

    VirusList.com Virus Alerts & Virus News. Wednesday, August 25, 2004

    1. 25th August 2004: Who knows what tomorrow will bring?
    2. How to subscribe/unsubscribe
    3. Security Rules

    ****

    1. 25th August 2004: Who knows what tomorrow will bring?

    A handful of sites are stating that Eugene Kaspersky, founder of Kaspersky Labs, believes that tomorrow will bring a massive terrorist attack on the Internet. This is being quoted in a range of ways, ranging from factual reporting to citing the story as an example of cyber hysteria.

    However, Kaspersky is not predicting the end of the Internet tomorrow - or even in the near future. The story stems from brief comments made yesterday at a press conference which was dedicated to cybercrime and the problems of spam.

    At this press conference, Kaspersky commented that the possibility of terrorists using the Internet as a tool to attack certain countries was a reality. As an example, he cited the fact that a number of Arabic and Hebrew language websites contained an announcement of an 'electronic jihad' against Israel, to start on 26th August 2004.

    In an interview today, Kaspersky stressed that such information was not necessarily trustworthy. 'We don't know who is behind these statements.' He went on to clarify: 'It's not the first time the term 'electronic jihad' has been used. We've seen this before, with the focus being on sending racist emails, and defacing and hacking Israeli web sites. But it is the first time I have seen sites encouraging the use of Internet attacks against one country as a form of terrorism.'

    'As we've already stated many times in the past, it would be easy enough to use a network of infected computers to launch such an attack. We saw the impact that Sasser, Mydoom and Slammer had, on the Internet, businesses and organisations. Just imagine if such an attack was directed at one country or one critical point in the infrastructure of the Internet. Computers are a tool - and just like any tool, they can be used or misused.'

    Kaspersky emphasised that the likelihood of a massive attack directed against Israeli institutions tomorrow is low. However, he believes that Pandora's box has now been opened. Hackers and virus writers can be motivated by a range of factors: money, curiosity, or political conviction. But whatever their motivation, the insecure nature of the Internet and weak security precautions offer a wealth of opportunities. 'Maybe it won't be tomorrow, or the day after tomorrow - but sooner or later, terrorists will be using the Internet as another weapon in their arsenal.' :snipped::

    See http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/today/0006. html for the rest.

    --
    Senior NCO in the fight against entropy. I've seen things, man. Things no one should have to see.....
  52. MD5 cracked? by noda132 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Whoa. The article says MD5 encryption was cracked. Is this true? I had only heard a rumour that a single collision had been found. And as for SHA-0... that's hardly making up the backbone of the Internet, is it?

    Wait a minute... is MD5 even encryption at all? I thought it was a "message digest"...

    1. Re:MD5 cracked? by kirkjobsluder · · Score: 4, Informative

      Multiple MD5 and one SHA0 collisions were confirmed at the Crypto 2004 conference in Santa Barbara. Perhaps more important is that these collisions demonstrated the feasibility of "shortcuts" to produce a collision. At this time, these are belived to be of little practical significance because they are still computationally expensive and affect only collision avoidance. There are two aspects to MD5 and SHA that are important. Collision avoidance is one, the other is preimage resistance (the difficulty creating an input to the function that produces a known output.) However, it is quite possible that these breaks can be expanded into even larger breaks, including preimage cracking.

      While not encryption, MD5 and SHA are used in a variety of ways that are important to encryption. For example PGP and GPG use hash algorithms and salt to convert plantext passphrases into pseudo-random encryption keys. So one possible threat is finding that MD5 and SHA are biased enough to make an attack feasible. It does not matter if blowfish uses 128 bit encryption if the function used to generate the key is significantly biased. Big huge "if."

      As someone else pointed out, MD5 is used to encrypt passwords in some password files. If someone expands the shortcut to defeat preimage resistance, it might be easier to find a working passphrase from a password file. Again, this is a big "if."

      So the one article is blowing things out of proportion. These are not the kind of breaks that would lead to a practical attack yet. The collisions were created using generated plaintexts so it is not likely that someone can slip a trojan into source code in such a way as to produce the same hash string.