Slashdot Mirror


Space-Age Houses

An anonymous reader writes "The dream of building the Jetson's Skypad Apartment may come to true because technology designed for space could become the basis of the new German Antarctic station. The same ultra-light composites that ESA uses onboard its spacecraft for antennas and solar panels, will be used to make a self-supporting lightweight shell-like structure able to withstand severe earthquakes. This approach is in sharp contrast to many contemporary design solutions that use ever more steel and concrete..."

22 of 230 comments (clear)

  1. Space Age Refrigerator by teiresias · · Score: 5, Funny

    as long as my Space Age House has a Space Age refrigerator thats connected to the internet so it can order my groceries for me........

    --
    -Teiresias
    1. Re:Space Age Refrigerator by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've always wondered what you do if the elevator breaks.

      "Toss me down a rope Marsha!"

      "Not until you admit you were wrong!"

    2. Re:Space Age Refrigerator by linzeal · · Score: 5, Funny
      "If those damn kids hack into my fridge again and order me 30 gallons of cow vagina and lentil soup I'm going to kill them!"

      - Me, in 30 years.

  2. Sounds perfect for Florida... by BerntB · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Should be perfect for Florida and other places with "high winds", using ultra-light composites... :-)

    --
    Karma: Excellent (My Karma? I wish...:-( )
    1. Re:Sounds perfect for Florida... by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 4, Informative

      True, but with only 7 Cat 5 Hurricanes in the past 50 years or so (and not all in Florida), and the actual definition of a CAT 5 hurricane is total destruction, with very few structures (if any) being able to withstand the full-force onslaught of a CAT 5 hurricane, I'd certainly live in this SpaceHouse... my Florida home is concrete top to bottom, and only rated to withstand a Category 3-4 hurricane.

      History of Cat 5 hurricanes:

      Hurricane Carla: This hurricane hit on September 10, 1961. It struck the Texas coast. About 500,000 people were evacuated from the area. Winds near the center of the hurricane were estimated at 150 miles per hour. Damage was about $2 billion (adjusted to 1990 dollars) and 46 people died.

      Hurricane Betsy: This hurricane hit on September 8, 1965. It hit Florida first and then turned and hit the Louisiana coast. A total of 75 people lost their lives. The hurricane had winds as high as 160 miles per hour. In 1990 dollars, Betsy caused $6.5 billion of damage -- making it the third most costly hurricane in the U.S.

      Hurricane Camille: This hurricane began on August 17, 1969. It was a Category 5 hurricane -- the most powerful rating, with winds as high as 200 miles per hour. The hurricane hit the U.S. Gulf Coast, but also caused flooding in Virginia. About 250 people died because of the hurricane and the flooding. It was the fifth most costly disaster in U.S. history, with damage of $5.2 billion (in 1990 dollars).

      Hurricane Celia: This hurricane hit Texas on August 3, 1970 and caused $1.6 billion in damage (in 1990 dollars). Very high winds damaged an airport and demolished a nearby mobile home park, fortunately, only 11 people died.

      Hurricane Gilbert: This hurricane hit on September 16, 1988. It was a Category 5 hurricane with winds as high as 160 miles per hour. It went through Jamaica, over the Yucatan peninsula of Mexico and came to the U.S. (Texas and Oklahoma) as a heavy rain storm. Damage in Mexico was many billions of dollars, and 318 people died.

      Hurricane Andrew: This hurricane hit on August 24, 1992 in southern Florida. It then turned and hit Louisiana. More than a million people had to leave the area due to the storm. Heavy rains and tornadoes were part of the hurricane's destructive power. Andrew was the most expensive hurricane in the history of the U.S.

      Hurricane Floyd: This hurricane, which struck in September 1999, brought so much rain that 13 states were issued federal disaster declarations -- more declarations for a single event than ever before. More than $500 million of federal money was spent on helping states recover. North Carolina was hit the hardest of any state.

      --
      Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
    2. Re:Sounds perfect for Florida... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's no dumber than a lot of the stuff they do in coastal areas to try and make houses "hurricane proof". I used to build them, so I know more about it than I ever wanted to.

      First, three meters of water is no big deal. Three meters of water hitting your house as a storm surge is a big fucking deal. Most houses on the coast are build on sand, under the cement. Sand is good. Makes a nice foundation...Until hurricane driven tides wash it and your heavy ass house away.

      As for durability...Most modern houses aren't set to last anywhere near 100 years. Sheetrock and plywood only go so far.

      Considering what a subdivision of stilt-houses looks like now, I don't see what the difference is. What looks weirder, a normal house on stilts or a house that looks like it's SUPPOSED to be on stilts?

      Seems like a perfectly decent idea to me. Solar power is way underutilized on the coast, and god knows regular housing doesn't fare all that well.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    3. Re:Sounds perfect for Florida... by Uggy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What kind of poor concrete house do you live in that can only withstand a category 3-4? When Georges passed over Puerto Rico in 1998, we didn't lose a single concrete house. Not a one (well except for mud slides in mountainous regions, but there's no helping that).

      The winds that hit my house were 140+ and in other areas in a direct path with the eye got even worse. San Juan metro area looked like Hiroshima afterwards. I never realized how many buildings there were with all the trees gone. But we don't have mobile homes where, and very little wood construction. Everything is concrete boxes.

      Don't know what sort of building codes you have over there, but I'd pit my house against a category 5. Not like I'd like it, but I think we could handle it.

      I guess since we live on an island, there's no place to evacuate to, so we've got build our houses tough.

      --
      Toddlers are the stormtroopers of the Lord of Entropy.
  3. What's cooler? by bobhagopian · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "The house is designed to be autonomous. It uses energy-efficient solar power as well as advanced systems for recycling and cleaning water. Another idea, now on the drawing board, is to include a system to remove pathogenic particles in the sub-micron range from the air."

    I think this is the coolest part about the house, not the ultra-light composites. Think about never having to pay an utility bill again! Sure, you can do that for just about any house, but one that's built with self-sufficiency in mind is nice.

    1. Re:What's cooler? by llevity · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Think about never having to pay an utility bill again!"

      I thought about this so much, I even tried it. It was great until they shut my power off.

  4. Space age? by vuvewux · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wasn't the 1960s the "space age"? If so, I live in a space age house!

    --

    Let's not forget that one can hate his government, but love his country.
  5. Wow, Europe sounds great. by funny-jack · · Score: 4, Funny

    In its current design the SpaceHouse can withstand vibrations from earthquakes of up to 7 on the Richter scale, wind speeds of up to 220 km/h and up to 3 metres of flooding - specifications that came out of discussions with the insurance industry for a typical European location.

    Wha-aah? Wow, that backpacking trip through Europe is looking a lot less attractive than I thought. No wonder they tried so hard to discover new worlds!

    --
    You probably shouldn't click this.
  6. Space Tubes by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 4, Funny

    All I want in my space aged buildings is a pneumatic tube for transportation - like a big version of what they have at the bank. Need to go to work? Jump in the pod and push SEND. Want to go the store? Jump in the pod and push SEND. Convenient and fun.

    Give me that, and I can die happy.

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
  7. Re:The structure, ok, but... by Vengeance · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd imagine that the shaking would be rather similar to that experienced on open ground, or at least it would be on the ground floor of a small structure. As I understand it, the shaking may be disconcerting but not generally dangerous, as long as it's not shaking loose heavy things above you.

    Of course, if a huge crack opens in the earth, taking you to the Land of the Lost, all bets are off.

    --
    It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
  8. Good idea by macshune · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These houses totally look cool and the design is awesome, but they use exotic materials that are probably only produced in huge quantities when large institutions have the money to get someone to cook up a batch. Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (more commonly, just Carbon Fiber)? Can't buy that at Home Depot, last time I checked:)

    It's a great exercise and it's exciting to the see the future take shape (literally!), but until regular folks can buy up some of this stuff to build homes out of, that's all it's gonna be.

  9. Re:A problem I see. by Wireless+Joe · · Score: 4, Funny

    If it's really like the Jetson's house, you just press the button on the side of the couch, and it folds up like a briefcase. Then you just pick it up by it's handle, step onto the moving sidewalk and wait for the clear tube to suck you up into the living room.

  10. Earthquakes, sure... by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Insightful
    will be used to make a self-supporting lightweight shell-like structure able to withstand severe earthquakes.

    How about typhoons and hurricanes?

    There's some housing in the Florida keys built on concrete pilars which look a bit like this, except they're square, built to withstand trailer shreading winds and stay above the water.

    I wonder how durable in extreme cold this stuff would be, particularly in cold climates, as much aluminum developes stress fractures. More surface area on the outside means more area to insulate, too.

    BTW, if you've ever considered living in a geodesic home, consider that the roofing costs about 3x what a regular house does. I wonder what mantenance would be like on these in the long term.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  11. Thats why the Japanese built paper houses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Because light is better than strong and heavy. In a gentle earthquake still most of the injuries are caused by fixtures and fittings flying around or objects falling from shelves. This increases but with the strength of the quake but almost all deaths are caused by crushing or suffocation when a structure collapses. Yes you would be flying around like seeds in a pod but unless your computer monitor decides to hit you back for all the times you whacked it then you can at least know you are going to survive with a few bruises.

  12. Sounds familiar by nytes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Of course, you could also jump into your time machine and visit the house of the future at Disneyland, circa 1957.

    It was made so well that the wrecking ball just bounced off of it when they tried to demolish it. They had to bring in a crew with saws.

    --
    -- I have monkeys in my pants.
  13. Some plus points by kabz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, the design goals that support these idea include :

    - must be assembled in situ. So transporation dictates that the components must be fairly lightweight. Starting out lightweight also means that additional highly effective insulation materials can be added to minimise heat loss to the environment.
    - must withstand cold. Space proven materials can already stand up to the extremes of cold.
    - aerodynamic design. Carbon reinforced plastic is great for forming into non-flat shapes. Note that all the pictures in the article show structures that look like they are designed to have low wind resistance when compared to traditional cabin shapes.
    - non-polluting at end of life. Lightweight structures that may be dissassembled and released from their ground tethers are better than traditional buildings that may have to use concrete foundations.

    I wonder if this style of building is something that will spread to normal life. If it could be made low cost, then it would sure beat having a mobile home !!

    Come to think of it, the Texas coast, just south of Galveston has some houses that look a bit similar to this, though the ones I've seen look more like they are made of sheet metal.

    --
    -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
  14. Re:Deja vu by shis-ka-bob · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Yup, I was thinking that too. I never really understood why Bucky was so concerned about the weight of a house. For compressive loads, a good cheap concrete seems quite reasonable. If you are talking about an aircraft, then cost is a function of weight. But I don't buy that arguement for a house. You can already drive a mobile home to a lot and install it an afternoon, but mobile homes are not considered 'premium' because of their mobility. Can any Slashdotter explain why lightweight is an asset in a house?

    I can understand the 'money as function of weight' argument for an Antartic station that is air lifted, but that is rather exceptional. I'm wanting to understand why Bucky's design never took off (pun intented.)

    --
    Think global, act loco
  15. Re:The structure, ok, but... by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 4, Funny

    You'd still need to strap down your water heater and bookshelves, yes. They aren't the biggest hazard. In fact the joke among seismic engineers is "Earthquakes don't kill people, buildings kill people".

  16. oblig. video game reference by LiquidMind · · Score: 4, Funny

    All your Antarctic spage-age house are belong to us.

    --
    This sig contains repetition and redundancy.