Slashdot Mirror


MST3K Rightsholders Sue Over Theater Commentary

An anonymous reader writes "How can people who parody people sue people who parody them? Mr. Sinus is being sued by Best Brains Inc. the owners of the rights to Mystery Science Theatre 3000 because they are using a name/format that is too similar to their own. Here is the story." Evil thought: Apple should include a "three silhouettes yakking on merged soundtrack" mode in iMovie.

31 of 312 comments (clear)

  1. Um, because. by MoxCamel · · Score: 4, Informative
    How can people who parody people sue people who parody them?

    That's an easy one. Because the people who are being sued are not parodying them. They're blatantly using the MST3k formula. At one point they even called the show "Mister Sinus Theater 3000." They also tried to license rights to MST3k. They knew what they were doing. Duh.

    Now, can we get back to feeling sorry for people that steal music please?

    1. Re:Um, because. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, dumbass, instead no one can:
      1) Go ask to be licensed by some guys to do the same thing they were doing *and* doing it in the same way *and* use almost the exact same way
      2) get turned down
      3) go ahead and do it anyway and just hope no one will notice.

      IF you were to *read* the (brief!) article, you would note the plantiffs just want the Mister Sinus guys to not use the Mister Sinus 3000 style name. It doesn't seem like such a big deal to me.

      People can still make fun of movies all they want--just don't call yourself MST3K without permission. (Unless, perhaps if you really *are* parodying them... which is not what the Mister Sinus guys are doing (apparently... although perhaps they'll claim different in court, if it gets to court).)

      Yes. I *am* an anonymous coward.

    2. Re:Um, because. by ePhil_One · · Score: 4, Informative
      Seems to me it's the name AND format Best Brains is complaining about-

      To paraphrase from the article:

      "All we want is for them to stop using our name"

      IANAL, but I'm pretty sure if they don't defend their trademark, they lose it. And if they license to this group they'll be diluting the brand, since they can't guarantee the quality of humor, there's no mad scientists, no sketches, etc. In other words, it's not MST3k, it's MST3k-like.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    3. Re:Um, because. by Mattcelt · · Score: 5, Informative

      Did you even RTFA? The MST3K owners don't even want them to stop doing the show - they just want them to use a different name, one that isn't so close to the original!

      This isn't about copyright AT ALL - it's about trademark infringement, which is a wholly different beast!

    4. Re:Um, because. by Stargoat · · Score: 2, Informative
      MST3k stole that formula from Svengoolie in Chicago. He was doing the same thing back in the 70s.

      They have even admitted to taking the idea from the Svengoolie show. I've noticed Richard Koz is not suing anyone.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    5. Re:Um, because. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Informative
      BTW, didn't the original guy who did this show get screwed by rightsholders?

      Apparently not. From the official MST3K site: (boldface added by me)

      Q: Why did Joel leave MST3K?
      A: Hodgson, who had created the series and labored on it ceaselessly for five years, asked off the show, pleading burnout. In the press release announcing his departure, Hodgson summed it up by saying:

      "It's time for me to hang up my red jump suit and move behind the camera. Besides, there's an old show business adage I once heard Adam West say: 'Stay in the same costume and before you know it, you end up signing pictures at an R.V. show.' Maybe it was Clayton Moore, now that I think of it."

      Q: When he left the show, didn't they say that Joel was going to continue working behind the scenes? But that never happened. Why?
      A: Yes, the press release about Joel's departure did say that Joel would "remain a member of the MST3K writing team and...also direct several episodes." Best Brains staffers later said that was the intention, but, as they tell it, almost immediately Joel got an opportunity to work on some other projects in Los Angeles, and he plunged into work on them. He soon was working full-time there on these other projects, and found there was no time to return to Minneapolis. Eventually, Joel had only a financial stake in the series, but no longer offered creative input.

      Q: I've heard rumors that Joel was fired and that there was bad blood between him and the rest of the cast and crew.
      A: Joel could not be fired. He was the show's creator. No one could have made him leave if he hadn't wanted to go.
      Although he covered as best he could during his time on the show, those that know him well say Joel is a shy person who was very uncomfortable in front of the camera, and was even more uncomfortable with his growing fame. Joel also reportedly prefers creating concepts to the day-to-day work of maintaining them. Once a project is up and running, those close to him say, he likes to move on to a new creation. "I want to become a behind-the-camera guy," Joel explained when he left. "I want to get on to the NEXT weird show. I want to bean idea man."
      Jim Mallon, however, resisted Joel's attempts to step away from the series, and felt it was Joel's responsibility, as host, to devote himself to the MST3K franchise. Ultimately the two parted ways. In retrospect, we think all sides now realize it was a healthy change for the series, and all the former cast members are on good terms with one another. That was certainly apparent during Joel's 1998 visit to the BBI studios to shoot his appearances in episode 1001- SOULTAKER. The authors of this FAQ were present at the taping, and Joel and the current cast got along comfortably and there was no tension at all during the taping.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  2. Re:the obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You must mean, "the obligatory first post that's really second."

  3. live performances are different by SethJohnson · · Score: 1, Informative


    Live performances are free from copyrights / trademarks. You have no further to look than all the schlocky tribute bands that perform Beatles, Judas Priest, and Black Sabbath covers. No licensing / royaltees are required for live performances.

    Michael Jackson is in serious debt right now. If there were a possibility that he could sue anyone who did the moonwalk, he'd have whole different set of lawyers aimed on this front.

    1. Re:live performances are different by tgd · · Score: 3, Informative

      Want to bet?

      You absolutely have to pay royalties/licensing to ASCAP or other organization managing the licensing for the music in question to perform that music legally.

      Most professional bands do. Schlocky local bands don't, but they are breaking the law as much as anyone is stealing music online.

    2. Re:live performances are different by SethJohnson · · Score: 2, Informative


      Ok, so I'm at a concert and a bunch of fools are shouting "Freebird!" The band on stage laughs and indulges the drunks with a few chords from freebird. Does Skynard get paid for this?

      Check ASCAP's website. Their licensing only applies to the playing of actual recordings in public.

      By your rationale, Tony Hawk can sue any skateboarder who performs a trick that is identical to his.

    3. Re:live performances are different by tgd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not specifically Skynard, but the licensing organization (BMI or ASCAP) absolutely does. Then they figure out how to divvy out the money to their members.

      Its not my rationale, its the law. You may disagree, but to be blunt, you're wrong.

    4. Re:live performances are different by gilroy · · Score: 4, Informative
      You know what I really love on slashdot? When someone posts a link to "prove" their point, and end up pointing out how wrong they are. From the linked FAQ:

      I know that I need permission for live performances

      Later in the same FAQ

      2. How much will it cost to obtain an ASCAP license to perform music?

      The annual rate depends on the type of business. Generally, rates are based on the manner in which music is performed (live, recorded or audio only or audio/visual) and the size of the establishment or potential audience for the music. For example, rates for restaurants, nightclubs, bars and similar establishments depend on whether the music is live or recorded, whether it's audio only or audio visual, the seating capacity of the bar or restaurant, the number of nights per week music is offered, the number of musicians, whether admission is charged and several other factors. ...
      Concert rates are based on the ticket revenue and seating capacity of the facility.


      Oh, I'd say it's pretty clear that even for live music, they expect their cut.
    5. Re:live performances are different by ccwaterz · · Score: 2, Informative
  4. Speaking As a Local by the+darn · · Score: 4, Informative

    These guys are the best...I've seen them abuse Masters of the Universe, Dirty Dancing, and Top Gun. The Xmas Clip Show is supposed to be INSANE. I always have wondered how they manage to get away with the name in this litigious age, though. It seems not even comedy is safe from stupidity.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas un post.
  5. Disagree with BBI here... by bullitB · · Score: 2, Informative

    Having seen two Mr. Sinus shows, I gotta say this seems bogus to me. What business are they losing here, exactly? People are going to spend money to go to a Mr. Sinus show instead of paying for and old episode of MST3K on DVD? Yeah, right.

    If they used robots, or filmed it, or if the show were still being made (or even aired on TV), BBI may have a leg to stand on, but it seems to me they're just trying to cash in on some good fans here.

    1. Re:Disagree with BBI here... by BarryNorton · · Score: 2, Informative

      RTFA - it's not about direct (competitive) loss of earnings, it's about loss of reputation due to the "adult type humour" in the version that's being passed off...

  6. An Austin resident speaking here... by rarose · · Score: 3, Informative

    Mr. Sinus is done at 9pm to midnight on Friday and Satuday nights... in the Club district... in a drafthouse.

    Ain't nobody taking their kids there by accident.

    --
    --Rob
    1. Re:An Austin resident speaking here... by Ksatriya · · Score: 2, Informative

      And also none of the Alamo Drafthouse locations allow kids under age 18 inside without a parent, regardless of what the movie is rated. Something to do with the fact that they serve alcohol, I guess. For the venue, the adult content seems entirely appropriate.

  7. Re:Not exactly... by Jason+One · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have to say that in this case, I agree that the big corporation is probably in the right.

    Best Brains is not a "big corporation." Ever since MST3K was cancelled, Best Brains basically just sells merchandise and licenses the occasional episode to Rhino for VHS/DVD release. As far as I know, they currently consist of about three people, including Jim Mallon (president of the company, formerly a producer for the show and the original voice of Gypsy).

    This is hardly a case of a huge behemoth looking to crush the little guy.

  8. Re:Not exactly... by write_with_numbers · · Score: 2, Informative

    "I have to say that in this case, I agree that the big corporation is probably in the right."

    Can we really call MST3K the big corporation?

    I remember watching a behind the scenes special on the Sci-Fi Channel during the last season of MST3K. On this special the viewer was given a backstage tour of the set, and they proudly displayed the new equipment that Sci-Fi had bought them. This earth-shattering new device was.... A Light!

    I think the real issue here is that it is a blatant rip-off of format with content that doesn't meet the approval of Best Brains. As an avid MSTie I believe that if Mr. Sinus would either change their name or clean up their content they would avoid this lawsuit.

    --
    You teach a child to read and he or her will be able to pass a literacy test. - George W. Bush
  9. Interesting by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Informative

    that they are suing over this, but have given their blessings to The Digital Archive Project which encodes and shares the shows that were not released commerically on DVD.
    I remember a quote from Kevin Murphy(one of the few founding members of the show to stay with it the whole time) "Ideas are free my friend"

  10. Re:that's just wrong by ewhac · · Score: 4, Informative
    All but about ten of the episodes are in public domain now.

    The term "public domain" has a very specific legal meaning. MST3K episodes are definitely not public domain. Although it may be strongly inferred that Best Brains doesn't mind unsanctioned copying (the phrase, "Keep circulating the tapes," appears prominently in the end credits of many shows), the shows themselves do not enjoy public domain status.

    Some of the shows are available commercially on DVD. That should be the first place MST3K fans look for episodes.

    Schwab

  11. Wow, what a backlash by PhracturedBlue · · Score: 3, Informative

    Seeing as how Mr. Sinus is local to Austin, most people here will never have seen it. However, the comments here are relaly harsh. Did they rip off the concept? Yes. Did they rip off the name? Yes. But to claim that MST3K should have exclusive rights to poking fun at a movie is absurd. These guys pay hommage to MST3K in their intro, the show is somewhat interactive, has a decent comedy routine in the middle, and is certainly original (they do lots of movies the MST3K guys would never touch) While I lived in Austin, I saw every Mr. Sinus show, and they are generally hillarious (Red Dawn was one of my personal favorites, the Village People Special was probably the worst of the bunch). They started doing the show after MST3K was pulled from the air. The show is mostly for adults, as there is almost always adult humor and language (The Christmas Specials bring this to an extreme). They are a comedy troupe doing original work in a stylistic format. And it is pretty damn funny.

  12. Re:Wait...wait... by superstick58 · · Score: 2, Informative
    I'm not sure if Best Brains is drawing issue with the format. It sounds more like they are trying to protect their trademark, that is, the Mystery Science Theater 3000 name. IANAL but I remember something in a law class way back when that if you don't defend your trademark it can become publicly used like xerox.

    So if they let this one go, pretty soon you'll be seeing all sorts of creative variations on MST3K in your local "adult" section.

  13. Re:Maybe if the started MAKING MST3K again... by elmegil · · Score: 2, Informative

    Um, they're doing just fine selling new releases of old episodes, why do they need new material to defend what they currently hold--much of which hasn't been released yet? As long as sites like DAPCentral (use google) are honorable and don't distribute episodes that are commercially available, they just help the brand, and won't get spanked. If you RTFA, you'll note that Mallon's beef is that these guys are taking the MST3K format and using it for more "adult" humor, and still want to trade on the idea that they're like MST3K.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  14. Re:jeez by Babbster · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're absolutely right, except for your closing statement. It's not copyright law, it's trademark law. The boys behind MST3k probably wouldn't even be suing if it weren't for the fact that if they let it go, especially knowing all about the group, they could eventually lose their trademark (unlike copyright which requires no active defense to maintain).

  15. Re:OT: MST3K reruns? by H_Fisher · · Score: 2, Informative
    Nope. Unless something changed in the last 24 hours, the reruns ended in Jan. when Best Brains' last contract with the Sci-Fi Channel ended.

    They'd been showing an ever-smaller pool of reruns for several years; as time went by they lost the rights to keep showing about 1/2 of their last three seasons, so they were down to about 10 - 12 episodes in the rotation.

    I love MST, but I kind of hate to see one group of smartass movie lovers going all corporate on another group of smartass movie lovers. But in their defense, Best Brains has been tolerant of those who trade copies of MST eps online or on tape, as long as they don't sell / copy the ones commercially available on VHS or DVD...

  16. Re:"deceptively similar"??? by rjstanford · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't see what about "Mister Sinus" is NOT parodic.

    Their name may be parodic. Their act (I live in Austin) is damn near identical. If it was a true parody, they would be doing a send-up of people who made fun of movies. They're not. They're making fun of movices themselves, just like the MST3K people do. That's the difference.

    Look at it this way. Creating a mock product called Queen-ex that proported to be a way to remove makeup from people in drag with amusing side effects like automatically applying facial hair? That's a parody. Creating a product called Queenex that's a facial tissue? That's trademark infringement, plain and simple.

    Besides, say out loud, "I'm going to go and see the Mr. Sinus Theatre guys as they make fun of Top Gun." If someone heard you say that, and wasn't a regular Alamo Drafthouse attendee, they'd think that you were talking about MST3K. Worse, what about, "I went to see the Mr. Sinus Theatre people do Top Gun, and it sucked balls." Same problem, but now with a negative connetation that's not Best Brains' fault. That's what the Best Brains folks don't want happening.

    For the record, the Mr. Sinus sendup of Top Gun rocks. It was just an example.

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  17. Well, gee by rd_syringe · · Score: 1, Informative

    Mr. Sinus uses no characters from MST3K. If MST3K thought the idea of making fun of movies was original, they should have filed a business method patent.

    Maybe that's why they're only suing for trademark infringement and not for anything else?

    I swear, people really need to think about RTFA.

  18. The lowdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Didn't read the whole thread, but in case anyone else hasn't done it, here's the particulars of the live show (I'm a huge fan, btw).

    For starters, they play the same music video at the start of each show. Here's the lyrics, played to video of the 3 guys engaging in hyjinx, including briefly trying to build a new Tom Servo.

    "Well the concept's not so original, it's true.
    But that other show stopped making new episodes
    And we didn't know what else to do.
    So we called our friends at the Alamo
    Then they gave us our show...
    Mr Sinus Theater 3000

    With Owen
    John
    and Jerm

    Well our shows are all live, not on TV.
    We can show films with nudity
    On Mr Sinus Theater 3000."

    Then the 3 guys come out and do some warm up comedy, giving some background trivia on the movie they're playing. There's a drinking game, and the the rules are established at this time.

    Then the show starts, and the three do hilarious comedy during the film. Every once in awhile, the key phrase or image or whatever happens, the audience shouts the appropriate response (established in the warmup), and then everyone drinks (The Alamo Drafthouse movie theater serves beer).

    The comedy during the movies is definitely R rated, and they usually cover big cheesy hit movies from the 80's (Dirty Dancing, He-Man, etc.)

    Half way through the movie, they stop it, and get up and do a skit based on the movie. They play characters from the movie, often in drag, or stripping down almost naked. Sometimes they do adlib sing alongs and whatnot. Very funny.

    Then back to the movie. When it's all over, they thank everyone for coming while the credits roll, then they sell t-shirts and CDs of their comedy out in the lobby.

    So they're clearly not doing a parody of MST3k, and they're blantantly referencing the old series in the opening. I'm definitely going to catch the show this friday to see if they mention the situation. Knowing them, they'll make brutal, raunchy fun of the whole thing.

    Looking forward to it.

  19. Further information by MilenCent · · Score: 2, Informative

    1. Mister Sinus is in the wrong, period. It's perfectly okay to make fun of movies in the Mystery Science style, but it's not okay to rip off their name. Maybe it would be if this were parody, but the thing being parodied is not MST, it's the movies, so that defense will probably collapse. To the guy who said Mister Sinus, in terms of quality, "kicks MST to the curb," I have to respond: I seriously doubt it.

    2. The Mystery Science style has been seen in a non-MST DVD before. Take a look at the director's commentary on Ghostbusters some day. Rather slick, if jittery.

    3. Best Brains has implied that copying episodes is okay, with "Keep circulating the tapes" in the credits of earlier episodes. Kevin Murphy, voice of Tom Servo and author of A Year At The Movies (which is GREAT, by the way) has condoned internet episode distribution in an interview (but it should be said that he is no longer a Best Brains employee, and wasn't one when he said it). But most fans, and distribution systems such as the DAP, refuse to trade episodes that can currently be purchsed. There are almost ten times as many episodes that aren't available as are, and some of the best ones (like the Gamera series and the other Japanese movies brought to the US by Sandy Frank Enterprises) will probably never be made available for official purchase because of rights issues surrounding the movie.

    But there is one really cool thing about all this: MST3K still has the cultural mindshare, among geeks at least, to make the front page on Slashdot! Cause for some celebration, perhaps.