Slashdot Mirror


Ringworld's Children

ppanon writes "When Larry Niven's Ringworld's Children came out in June, I picked up a copy and it's been sitting on my shelf since. I had been hesitating to read it because I didn't want to be disappointed by it as I had been by some of his other solo novels in the last decade (Destiny's Road, The Ringworld Throne). But being home with a virus this weekend, and having run out of new Anime DVDs to watch, I thought it was time to catch up on some reading. I looked at Niven's book and thought, 'Might as well, I can't feel much worse.' As I got further into the novel, my problem wasn't that of feeling worse, it was forcing myself to put the book down when I felt I needed to rest again." Read on for the rest. Ringworld's Children author Larry Niven pages 284 publisher TOR rating 8.5 reviewer Paul-Andre Panon ISBN 0765301679 summary excellent page turner

The Ringworld is like a small slice of a Dyson Sphere, a massive ring with radius slightly larger than 1 AU, spun to simulate gravity on the inside with thousand mile-high side walls to hold atmosphere. In the second Ringworld novel, The Ringworld Engineers, it was revealed that the Ringworld was probably created by Pak protectors, a species cousin to humans with three phases in their life cycle: juvenile, breeders, and protectors. Protectors are extremely territorial, competitive, and intelligent, and will go to any lengths they can to protect and provide competitive advantage for their descendants, as identified by a keen sense of smell. While protectors normally cull out any significant genetic divergence from normal (picked up by changes in smell), a failure in the food supply caused all protectors in the Earth Pak colony to die. Breeders evolved sapience and became homo sapiens.

Something similar has somehow happened on Ringworld and, in the third book, after decades exploring the Ringworld, our hero, Louis Wu, decides to replace the current insane master of the Ringworld, Bram, a protector created from a vampirical species also evolved from the original Pak breeders. Even insane, Bram is still many times smarter, stronger, faster, and tougher than any human, so Louis and his cohorts don't have much of a chance taking him on. Humans and all Pak-descended Ringworld species can still turn into (misshapen/modified) protectors if exposed to tree-of-life root, but Louis is too old to make the transition to protector himself (besides, he likes breeding). He carefully creates another protector, Tunesmith, and, with the help of others, they manage to kill Bram.

Ringworld's Children picks up a few months after the end of the Ringworld Throne. Louis comes out of the autodoc that has been repairing the severe damage he suffered in the fight against Bram. He's also young again, thanks to Carlos Wu's one-of-a-kind nanotech autodoc, after tinkering by the hyper-intelligent Tunesmith. Tunesmith has been busy soaking up all Known Space knowledge, including advanced Puppeteer knowledge from the completely intimidated Hindmost, the former leader of the Puppeteer race and Louis' erstwhile employer. He's also been working on cleaning up some of the mess left by Bram (tens of centuries or more of overdue Ringworld repairs - Bram was a lousy housekeeper, too). More urgent however is the Fringe War, a cold war in the remote asteroid belt at the far edges of the Ringworld system (similar to our Oort Belt). Most of the major species of Known Space have at least a few ships there. The ARM (the UN's police/military forces) and the Kzin have substantial war fleets. All the factions want to learn the Ringworld's secrets. Those fleets have antimatter weapons that could destroy the Ringworld as collateral damage and, for perhaps decades, they've been in a Mexican standoff, but deployments and movement patterns indicate all antimatter hell could break loose in the near future.

Louis' puppet strings are now held by Tunesmith, and since Tunesmith takes some pretty big calculated risks without explaining their rationale, Louis likes it maybe even less than when those strings were held by the Hindmost. Even if they get past the immediate emergency, Tunesmith's likely long-term plans for Louis are far from appealing. He has to figure out how to permanently escape from Tunesmith and the Ringworld without getting blown up by the Fringe War or triggering an apocalyptic attack on the Ringworld. His only chance at escape from Tunesmith's vastly superior intelligence is that Tunesmith is heavily distracted planning on how to deal with the Fringe War.

In earlier ringworld novels, when Louis and his co-explorers made first contact with native Ringworld population groups, they would play the "God Game," first getting their story straight and consistent before conning the natives to obtain knowledge or food. That dialogue technique is used here again, including when Louis uses it by himself to figure out scenarios he can use against Tunesmith. Part of my mind was a little distracted, thinking "Is this how Niven works out the plot outline of novels, before fleshing out individual scenes or chapters?" But the rest of my (virus-addled) brain was racing along trying to figure all the possibilities where Niven or his characters might be going. Even so, Niven still managed to completely surprise me once near the end, because I'd let myself get distracted and miss a couple of the better hidden clues.

Along the way, Niven ties up a lot of loose ends and answers a lot of questions, about the Ringworld and about some other phenomena in the Known Space universe. The plot has few slow points, and almost none in the second half of the book, hiding fairly well Niven's slightly-less-than-usual weakness at character development. This novel should earn Niven another Hugo nomination

If you're a recent SF reader and can't handle the lack of ubiquitous computers or the ESP/Psionics that dates some of Niven's more famous and popular 60's and 70's era stories (when the Amazing Randi hadn't yet debunked Uri Geller and most others of his ilk), you may find his Ringworld stories more palatable. Pak don't need or want computers on the ringworld, and there's passing mention of psionics only because of the conventions established in other Known Space series. If you like older 60's or 70's-vintage Niven stories because of the imaginative aliens, environments, or inventions, you'll almost certainly enjoy reading this book. Finally, if you've liked any of the other stories in the Ringworld or Known Space series and were left wanting more, you need to read this book.

You can purchase Ringworld's Children from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

187 comments

  1. Larry Niven? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hasn't done anything for me in a while... Donald Kingsbury on the other hand, he writes a great book!

    1. Re:Larry Niven? by goober1473 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Hmm did something for me, the quote:

      But being home with a virus this weekend, and having run out of new Anime DVDs to watch,

      I have mostly found on a Friday it's not the weekend, I dearly wish for the late afternoon meeting or system problem to to bother me on a Friday, particually before watching DVDs all day and then reading a book and writing the review ready for slashdot.

    2. Re:Larry Niven? by Illbay · · Score: 1
      Still love Niven. Back in the early seventies as a "geek" before the term was used to signify such, I got so into his novels and stories that they made me wish I could just teleport into his universe.

      There are only a few such authors like that for me: Vernor Vinge, Michael Shea, George R. R. Martin, Scott Card to name some names.

      --
      Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
    3. Re:Larry Niven? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I too loved early Niven books. Then -- what? Dude if you don't want to write, fine, but don't write stuff that just sneers at your (former) fans.

      Based on this review, however, maybe there is still some newer Niven that is worth reading.

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  2. Oh Boy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You ran out of anime DVDs!?

  3. Larry Niven's Known Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is one of those series of books I think should be made into movies. Mono-filiment weapons, impact armour, Pak Protectors, Pearson's Puppeteers, the whole shabang!

    I would love love to see Louis Wu on the silver screen. Such a coherent universe filled with POSSIBLE (kinda) technology. I just love it. And books like Lucifer's hammer and the Smoke Ring series are some of my favorites.

    1. Re:Larry Niven's Known Space by east+coast · · Score: 4, Insightful

      one of those series of books I think should be made into movies

      Wish nothing of the sort! I can only imagine Hollywood's greasy hands on Niven. They'd shread it to the point that besides the minimal plot line there would be nothing left. And that's even being optimistic... Most screenwriters think that putting their own spin on a story makes it better. These people normally think wrong.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:Larry Niven's Known Space by HiThere · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Good books usually make lousy movies. And sometimes poor books make good moives. The two media do things very differently.

      (OTOH, I stopped watching the Tolkien Trilogy after the second movie. If you found that tampering with the plot acceptable, then disregard the previous paragraph.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re:Larry Niven's Known Space by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

      They already made a gameabout it (kinda).

    4. Re:Larry Niven's Known Space by guinsu · · Score: 1

      Actually, wasn't the Halo was smaller than the Ringworld and more based on Iain M. Banks' Orbitals?

    5. Re:Larry Niven's Known Space by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      I agree with the fact that any movie adapton would suck. Per definition....
      But the "hard sf" part of nivens books are great... Especially his "perfect machines", like the Lying Bastard, with technology thats NEARLY magic, but still understandable...
      The slaver desintegrators, the GP hulls that survive everything but antimatter, the statis fields ect are not really unique, but the way they are naturally handled like they simply FIT into the universe is just too cool.
      The only bad thing about the "known space" universe is that Niven let too many rookie authors who suck at writing create stories in it....

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    6. Re:Larry Niven's Known Space by chaoticset · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What really needs to be turned into a film is Cloak Of Anarchy.

      --

      -----------------------
      You are what you think.
    7. Re:Larry Niven's Known Space by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I stopped watching the Tolkien Trilogy after the second movie.

      Can't say as I blame you. It was hard to stay enthusiastic about the films after seeing Aragorn fall off a cliff, Faramir hauling Sam and Frodo to Osgiliath, then Frodo trying to hand the Ring to a Nazgul. ROTK had it's share of plot changes too. (cutting the final showdown between Gandalf and Saruman was criminal -- but at least it will (allegedly) be in the extended edition) I find it helps to think of it as, "Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings", not the canonical version.

    8. Re:Larry Niven's Known Space by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Scifi channel are supposed to be making a mini series...

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    9. Re:Larry Niven's Known Space by Xibby · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to Cinescape, Ringworld is being turned into a Sci-Fi Channel mini-seriies. Time will tell if it makes the cut...

      --
      I'm going to go back in my box and will think within the limits of my box: MS Sucks Linux Good I read too much Slashdot.
    10. Re:Larry Niven's Known Space by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That's not to say that it's not possible to do it well. It would end up leaving out a lot of the why and wherefore and just showing you what happened, but the real question I think is whether or not you can sell it without studio editing. You have to make them believe that more people will go see it if they don't screw it up. The fact is that you could merchandise the living shit out of a ringworld movie. How many of you people wouldn't buy a figurine or plushie of a pierson's puppeteer? PUT YOUR FUCKING HANDS DOWN YOU LYING BASTARDS. Or go pick up Ringworld and read the damned thing.

      The fact is that while the sequels would be mangled beyond recognition there's enough action in the first movie to where most of it would stick around. Of course, that would require that someone with a clue got their hands on the rights to make the movie. This sort of thing does not happen very often.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Larry Niven's Known Space by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Good books can turn into good movies in two or three ways. They can make the movie faithfully out of the book, which makes a really long movie but produces good results if the actors are ok. They can make a decent movie which faithfully relays the message(s) of the book. And, they can make a totally different movie than what an actual screenplay of the book would be, that regardless turns out to be an excellent movie.

      It is a shame what happened to the two towers, and when I watch that movie I generally go get a sandwich or something when frodo is being taken to minas tirith. However, I thought the first and third movies were quite good.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Larry Niven's Known Space by east+coast · · Score: 1

      That's not to say that it's not possible to do it well.

      I think it's a pretty long shot. My guess is that if any Niven material could get to the silver screen in some semblence of it's true self it would probably be one of the Dream Park series. Personally I'm very fond of Dream Park and the "sci" end of it isn't so far off course that the story could not only be beleivable but also draw out people who are not really into the sci-fi aspect of things. Not that those people don't suck or anything...

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    13. Re:Larry Niven's Known Space by techno-vampire · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One thing that can keep Hollywood from mucking up the movie is for the author to be one of the people financing the film, and Larry's got enough cash to do exactly that.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    14. Re:Larry Niven's Known Space by techno-vampire · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, it would be a great film, but it will never happen. The film makes a strong point, and one the film people don't want made: when you get right down to it, most people really aren't going to behave themselves if they think they can get away with it.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    15. Re:Larry Niven's Known Space by plover · · Score: 3, Insightful
      [ WARNING: PERSONAL MOVIE OPINIONS AHEAD ]

      Stephen King did that, and any movie he's made where he was personally in control of the screenplay kinda sucked (at least in my opinion.) The Shining, The Running Man, The Shawshank Redemption, all directed by other people were big Hollywood hits. The movies where he was more involved (in order to be more true to his books,) such as The Langoliers and The Stand, just weren't as gripping as far as movies go. I mean I liked them, just not as well as the ones that had another person's vision putting them on the screen.

      An author obviously has his or her ideas for screenplays as far as the story goes, and what a vision of it may be, but that doesn't necessarily mean that authors have the "eye" required to make a great movie.

      Not that we could, but I'd really like to see a Phillip K. Dick movie made by his own hand. Any of his stories would do. I'd love to know what went on in that brain of his. But that doesn't mean it would be a commercially successful movie. Now, compare that to some of Hollywood's best science fiction movies that were adaptations of his novels: Bladerunner, Minority Report, etc. Hugely successful, incredibly entertaining, but not necessarily true to every word he wrote.

      Obviously, Larry can afford to take a chance and make his own movie. But that doesn't mean it's going to be a great film. Yes, Hollywood filmmakers can screw up a good story, but some of them can also spin a great movie from a good story.

      --
      John
    16. Re:Larry Niven's Known Space by Kesh · · Score: 1

      The Halo is much smaller than a ringworld from the novels, since it orbits around the star as a satellite rather than surrounding the star like a... well, halo. ;)

    17. Re:Larry Niven's Known Space by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      I'd rather see Integral Trees and Smoke Ring made into a movie. With today's special effects, it could be done, and they work better as standalone stories. Especially Integral Trees, because when the book starts the main characters don't know much about the world, and they (and the reader) learn it as they travel - they learn more of the history of how the people got there, and they learn about more of the complex societies and complex critters in the ring. That's a perfect way to introduce the setting to the movie viewer, as it avoids the SF "narrator info-dump" problem.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    18. Re:Larry Niven's Known Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you consider Niven's (and Pournelle's) self stated political beliefs and the current climate in Hollywood, I'd say he stands a good chance of royal treatment by Hollywood.

    19. Re:Larry Niven's Known Space by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      I wasn't thinking of Larry making the movie on his own, just investing in it so as to give him a bigger voice in how it's made. He's a smart man, and I can't picture him trying to control the whole movie, just keep Wollyweird from going off into left field.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  4. New covers? by beeglebug · · Score: 5, Funny

    If so I just know i'm going to have to to buy the first three again so they don't look stupid on the shelf together...

    1. Re:New covers? by dwhitman · · Score: 5, Funny

      > If so I just know i'm going to have to to buy the first three again

      Ringworld, the directors special cut edition?

      Ringworld was one of the first SF novels I bought as a kid, when I ran out of material at the local public library. My copy is a first edition where Niven's got the world rotating backwards during Louis Wu's attempt to stretch out his birthday via teleportation. The newer printings have all been digitally reworked to cover up the mistake.

      I'm pretty sure that in the newer printing Nessus fires the tasp at the exact same time that Speaker to Animals is swinging the variable sword, but I'm too cheap to buy a copy to check.

  5. Growing up, Niven and Pournelle ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...were my favorite authors. Starting with Lucifer's Hammer, then Oath of Fealty, The Mote in God's Eye, and all the rest -- I'd purchase their co-authored novels in hardback when I could, which I did with very few authors.

    Unfortunately, after Ringworld Engineer's, Niven's solo output seems to have fallen in quality and I went with David Brin for my hardback book-buying :) I'll still pick up this latest one, I just hope it is better than Destiny's Road.

  6. Publisher's Weekly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    I just read a review in publisher's weekly that said this was Niven's worst ringworld book to date -- the characters are flat, it can't be understood without religious attention to the earlier books, and the infodumps are too dry.

    Now I'm so torn -- WHO TO BELIEVE?!?

    1. Re:Publisher's Weekly by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1
      Now I'm so torn -- WHO TO BELIEVE?!?

      Read it yourself and draw your own conclusion. It's not like the universe will end if you don't like it.

    2. Re:Publisher's Weekly by mykepredko · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm a big Niven/Ringworld fan and I've read (and re-read all the books). I would say Ringworld's Children is somewhere in the middle of the books - although there is a plot point that really pissed me off.

      The book is probably is the best thing that Niven has written in years (take what you will from this) but it's nowhere as good as the original "Ringworld" or his other early/mid '70s novels like "Protector" or "A gift from Earth".

      The story does move reasonably well although I found that with this story Niven got a bit too deep in the minutia of the engineering of the Ringworld and what happens when it is punctured.

      Cryptic Spoiler Warning: What I considered to be the logical continuation in the story arc did happen but Niven wimped out and changed things back to the way they were. If you are a fan of Ringworld and Niven's "Known Space" series, you can probably guess what I'm talking about.

      This reversal killed the book for me; up to this point the story progressed nicely (although a little flat due to the technical descriptions) and I was looking forward to future books with the change.

      If you're a big Niven fan and have read all the Ringworld books, then it is probably worth buying the paperback.

      myke

    3. Re:Publisher's Weekly by abb3w · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I'd disagree with that assessment; Ringworld Throne was worse. However, it definitely requires reading all three of the earlier Ringworld books first, and if you haven't read all of Niven's other Known Space material (including Kzin Wars stuff from him and his guests), there will be lesser references (EG, "Sheathclaws") you won't get. The infodumps are no dryer than needed for protectors conversing in a hurry, and while some of the minor players lack depth, most of the characters are as well developed as Niven ever manages.

      Snuggle up to your local librarian to borrow the hardcover, perhaps buy the paperback when it comes out, or the hardcover when copies start hitting clearance prices in B&N and the like (which is the only reason I bought Ringworld Throne-- I decided it was worth four bucks in hardcover to fill in the hole in my Niven collection). It's Niven, so it's not bad, but he's not on my short list of hardcover purchases these days. (Bujold, Brust, Laurell Hamilton, George RR Martin, and Modesitt-- the last of whom I don't recommend usually, but his work suits some of my tastes.)

      It felt a trifle skeletal, but he's got a universe of details to juggle consistently, so I can sympathize with his restraint in not making a larger book.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    4. Re:Publisher's Weekly by miu · · Score: 1
      Now I'm so torn -- WHO TO BELIEVE?!?

      After the previous book in the series? I believe the Publishers Weekly review.

      This book would have to be really bad to be worse than Ringworld Throne. There are few things more painful to read than an aging author trying to participate in the pop culture of 10 minutes ago (those awful vampires). I've never agreed with the entire Niven worldview and his habit of having "repentant" liberal characters spout neo-con bullshit occasionally sickens me, but at least his books are written with a distinctive voice and I've always enjoyed them. The last Ringworld book was like a midlife crisis in book form and I found very little to like about it - I'll give this one a pass.

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
    5. Re:Publisher's Weekly by ppanon · · Score: 1

      I had read that review and mostly disagreed with it. Then again, I have read the other three Ringworld books, although I found Ringworld Throne a tough slog. Niven does provide a quick introduction to the cast of characters at the beginning of the book, and I tried to add a short summary of the third book in my review so that people who hadn't read it or other Known Space/Ringworld novels could still enjoy his latest.

      I agree with the Publisher's Review that the characters are mostly flat. Larry Niven's characterization has always been weak; he's no Lois McMaster-Bujold. His strength is in ideas, and there's no shortage of them in this book, even if it's sometimes just revisiting old ideas with a completely new point of view or mixing two old ideas in a new way. This is why he excels in short story and novelette formats where the length usually doesn't give much opportunity for character development. It's also part of the reason why he and Jerry Pournelle wrote some very decent tomes earlier on: their strengths complement each other and they used to compensate well for each other's weaknesses.

      Some of my favourite Niven stories are in the Neutron Star and Convergent Series short story collections. Niven has started writing short stories again (with some Draco Tavern stories published in Analog recently) and some have been very good. It's what gave me enough hope about his writing to bother buying and reading this book in the first place. Until then he had pretty well lost me as a reader with Throne.

      Frankly I'm glad that Niven didn't regurgitate a summary of the last three books mixed in with new material in the first N chapters, even after a 10 year hiatus. I always feel ripped off when an author does that; I don't want to pay for material I've already read. In those types of books I often can't skip through the first few chapters because the re-hash is mixed in with new plot points.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    6. Re:Publisher's Weekly by ppanon · · Score: 1

      This reversal killed the book for me; up to this point the story progressed nicely (although a little flat due to the technical descriptions) and I was looking forward to future books with the change.

      I think you're being a little harsh. While I did find the novel's explanation for the reversal weak, I can understand a little why Larry chose to carry out the reversal. Besides the rationale for that reversal is provided by a character in the book, and maybe the character was lying. It wouldn't be the first time.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
  7. Donald Kingsbury by FlyingOrca · · Score: 1, Informative

    I'll second that! I've only found two so far, and both were remarkably good - inventive, gripping, credibly human. Top-flight SF.

    --
    Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.
  8. I'm gonna read it... by mocular · · Score: 5, Insightful
    even if it has been a decade or two since he wrote a novel I could really get into. I became a real SF fan reading Niven in the 70s, so I have to at least try to be loyal.

    I still re-read Beowulf Shaefer stories every now and again. I almost have them memorized, but still think they are some of the best SF ever - in an `old friend` kind of way.

    Ringworld was really great at the time. But the sequels fell into the Asimov trap of trying to tie everything in Known Space together after they were written with obvious discrepencies.

    And, alas, I just can't stand to read fantasy. Whenever there is a plot problem, BOOM! magic happens. Niven's hereditary luck fell into this fantasy trap and it hurt his work.

    Here's hoping Niven's back to the good stuff!

    1. Re:I'm gonna read it... by MrLint · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Niven's stories about the teleporters and the monks were great. the last ringworld book let me blah.

    2. Re:I'm gonna read it... by geoswan · · Score: 1
      Asimov wasn't the only author to strain to tie all their stories together into a coherent whole. Heinlein tried to do so too. I am one reader who thinks this was a wasted effort.

      I will read this latest Niven too. I can't remember the last Niven work I have read, although I think I read all of his work when he was young.

      About authors who haven't published anything new for a long time...

      About ten years ago John Varley published his first novel in a decade or so -- "The Steel Beach". In the front matter he acknowledged that it wasn't entirely consistent with his earlier novels. But I didn't detect any inconsistencies.

      The first two thirds or three quarters of this novel were great! The ending however really, really sucked.

      Varley tried to address a deep, serious, philosophical question. In a depressing Universe, filled with pain and suffering, why go on? It was a great question. I could barely wait to read his answer.

      What I think went wrong with this novel is that he couldn't come up with an answer. I suspect this depressing topic really depressed him. And he couldn't come up with an ending.

      I think the sales of his older works flagged, and he couldn't afford not to finish it. Maybe Gordie Dickson gave him some cynical advice. And so he threw together a shallow, cynical, ending; that "played to the house".

    3. Re:I'm gonna read it... by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Funny

      >trying to tie everything in Known Space together

      In fact, I think there should be one in which a Slaver who's been in stasis gets an amplifier helment and tries to take over the Ringworld. It could be called The Lord of the Ringworld of Ptavvs.

    4. Re:I'm gonna read it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And, alas, I just can't stand to read fantasy. Whenever there is a plot problem, BOOM! magic happens.

      Do yourself a favor and pick up A Game of Thrones by George R. R. Martin. It's fantasy, sure, but there's veeeery little magic, and what magic the guy did put in is done very well. It's also a highly character-driven story with twists and turns all over the place, and something of a disregard for certain informal rules of fiction writing (which is an intentionally vauge statement; someone who has read the book should know what I mean).

      If that didn't convince you, I implore you to read this review, from which I stole a few words.

  9. Niven/Pournelle - O'Brian by vDiver · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The only fiction authors I read anymore. I didn't care much for Ringworld Throne, but still found in it something to enjoy, at least as part of the series.

    Time to go back through all my Known Space books again, and get ramped up for this one :)

    Anyone looked at N-Space? There's a great story in there by Niven about how to blow up the whole storyline! Makes life fun.

    1. Re:Niven/Pournelle - O'Brian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Anyone looked at N-Space? There's a great story in there by Niven about how to blow up the whole storyline!

      That would be Down in Flames.

  10. Read on for the rest? by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 4, Funny

    "As I got further into the novel, my problem wasn't that of feeling worse, it was forcing myself to put the book down when I felt I needed to rest again." Read on for the rest.

    But I wanted to hear about what he thought of the book.

    --
    -- dR.fuZZo
  11. Misread title by duggie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Did anyone else read the topic as Ringworm's Children?

    1. Re:Misread title by RsG · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can't whore funny mods anymore. Funny != Karma now (which sucks, but at least it reduces Karma whoring).

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
  12. I read that as... by Mateito · · Score: 0, Redundant

    .. "Ringworm's children".

    Eewww.. offspring of an itchy bot-bot.

  13. Known Space Movie by Tmack · · Score: 4, Informative
    Its been discussed off and on, details here, even though that site hasnt been updated in a while (last year by the looks of it). The movie rights for Ringworld have been sold, but as of yet not much has come of it. This was also brought up in the Slashdot interview with Niven.

    Tm

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  14. Niven follows hard science... by Plural+of+Mongoose · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Unlike many SF writers, Niven _tries_ to follow 'hard science' whenever possible; to wit - when college students pointed out the ringworld was unstable as first presented, he wove that fact into subsequent stories, as well as the 'attitude jet' solution.

    That's why I gotta admit I was dissapointed at his focus on 'good luck genetics' as the series progressed. A weak hook for a writer who usually does better.

    --
    The last fucking thing you want is my undivided attention...
    1. Re:Niven follows hard science... by paganizer · · Score: 1

      Why?
      Do you know for a 100% certain fact that such a thing is impossible?

      I've told students "If I drop this weight, it'll probably hit the floor. However, there exist the possibility that it won't. Why? because until such a time as complete, total understanding of the workings of the universe comes along, there is no such thing as 100% certainty".

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    2. Re:Niven follows hard science... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      [...]I was dissapointed at his focus on 'good luck genetics' as the series progressed. A weak hook for a writer who usually does better.

      You mean, a fantastic hook (in terms of fantasy the genre, not fantasy the wet dream) for a writer who usually produces (more or less) hard science fiction.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Niven follows hard science... by Cheetahfeathers · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and it was great... in the 80s and before. Current science and technology is going in a very different direction, ala biotech/nanotech. Ignoring this to live in the future envisioned in the 70s and 80s is just too much. It goes way beyond suspension of disbelief into the realm of the absurd.

      Keep up with the times... you're suposed to be a futurist, Mr. Nivin. Stop living in the past and come up with a new vision.

  15. Good review by 14erCleaner · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I agree completely with the reviewer's assessment. This might be Niven's first worthwhile novel in a decade or more. I was a rabid fan of the Known Space stuff (and also of most of the Niven/Pournelle collaborations up to the mid-80's at least), but sometime in the 1990 time frame Niven really lost it. Maybe too much success, or too much mystical/magical BS, but I couldn't really stand his work for a while. This novel, on the other hand, was a really good read. I'd recommend it to anybody who likes "classic" Niven stuff.

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
    1. Re:Good review by nonmaskable · · Score: 1

      I think several (no names come to mind immediately) books he's written with other people have been pretty good over the last decade.

      I might just be soft, though. I didn't hate Destiny's Road.

    2. Re:Good review by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      I have not seen this newest book yet (has it even been released in Europe?) but found the previous one so-so. Could have been better, could have been worse.

      The sequels which really unreservedly sucked were the last Dune books from Frank Herbert (Chapterhouse Dune is in a class of it's own) but I suppose there were mitigating circumstances:
      - his wife (?) had died of cancer
      - he himself was about to go the same way.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
  16. Haven't been able to get into Ringworld by sjbe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know there are a lot of Niven fans out there but I found the Ringworld novels to be rather uninteresting. Sure, the idea of the Ringworld is an interesting one but I found it to be about the only interesting thing in the books. One neat technology idea does not make for a good book. The character development and story line just didn't do it for me. (YMMV) Maybe it's meant to be pulp science fiction, I don't know.

    I haven't read a lot of Niven's other stuff but I hope some of it is better (IMO) than Ringworld. So to you Niven fans out there, if I want to read more Niven what (if anything) is actually worth reading? Ringworld just didn't do it for me.

    1. Re:Haven't been able to get into Ringworld by Plural+of+Mongoose · · Score: 3, Informative

      Lucifer's Hammer!

      Niven and Pournelle at their finest!

      --
      The last fucking thing you want is my undivided attention...
    2. Re:Haven't been able to get into Ringworld by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Mote in God's Eye!

      Niven and Pournelle at their finest! ;)

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
    3. Re:Haven't been able to get into Ringworld by MadMorf · · Score: 4, Informative

      So to you Niven fans out there, if I want to read more Niven what (if anything) is actually worth reading?

      Try "The Smoke Ring" and "The Integral Trees".
      He manages to paint a totally believable world in a very unlikely situation.

      Also, "The Mote in God's Eye" and "The Gripping Hand" are two of my all time favorites...

      The "Tales of Known Space" series (of which Ringworld is only a part) are great stories, IMHO...

      I don't much care for his "Gil of the ARM" stories, but that's just me...

    4. Re:Haven't been able to get into Ringworld by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      I too loved his _Smoke Ring_ series. (and Ringworld, before Throne) Sounds like Niven's back in his game with this latest novel. I wonder if it's too much to hope for a return to the world of the Admiralty, CARM's and Integral Trees..

    5. Re:Haven't been able to get into Ringworld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After having read "The Reality Dysfunction" by Peter F. Hamilton, Hyperion by Dan Simmons ect ect.
      I have also lost all interest in Niven/Pournelle.

    6. Re:Haven't been able to get into Ringworld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A World Out Of Time" is good.

      I think "Legacy of Heorot" would make a good movie.

    7. Re:Haven't been able to get into Ringworld by miu · · Score: 1
      I'd say Footfall and The Mote in God's eye are both better than Ringworld, Oath of Fealty is close. A lot of his short fiction is pretty good too.

      I liked Ringworld, but if you didn't read it as a young kid back in the 80's you probably won't connect with it as well. A lot of technology, techniques, and ideas that Niven invented/perfected have become part of mainstream SF now (which means the originals are no longer exceptional) and the hard science his stories are based on has not aged well - even when it is correct science it is no longer as interesting.

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
    8. Re:Haven't been able to get into Ringworld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Mote in God's Eye"

      "Mote" is not a Niven story. It's a Niven/Pournelle story. I make the distinction only because their collaborations are almost always better than the stuff either of them does alone.

      (Solo, I like Niven better than Pournelle, which is not necessarily to say that the latter is bad.)

  17. A new Ringworld? Excellent! by Mad+Ogre · · Score: 1

    I love Niven's writing. Didn't know he had a new one out. I'm ording this off Amazon.com right now.

    --
    MadOgre.com
  18. Niven is dead by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    _Ringworld_ and _Ringworld Engineers_ were some of the best SF I ever read, even ruining the chances for lesser writers to be taken seriously as they scuttled in Niven's shadow. But _Ringworld Throne_ was so bad that I threw it across the room in mid-read: the "Ringworld thrown" pun was its most entertaining feature. I expect that _Ringworld's Children_ is another cashin on Niven's famous brand. Just like Herbert's Dune books #3+, Asimov's Foundation books #3+, and every other sequel written years after the original success, inspired by formulaic publishing profit more than the ideas. I haven't read any other book written by Niven since the early 1980s that are even close to his first decade or so of "Known Space". If any one of those has escaped your reading list, track it down first, before wasting time on a writer past his prime. He's become a complete creature of LA, wallowing in sequel money, gasping for a breath of talent or inspiration.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Niven is dead by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Properly understood, the Herbert Dune books make a unified picture. The recent prequels, OTOH, should be garbaged immediately.

      I think that many of Niven's recent books aren't worth reading, so I haven't been following them. And most of them are without much depth (in contrast to the Herbert books).

      Ringworld was a tour-de-force. A spectacular extrapolation. And tremendously entertaining. But it wasn't deep. Perhaps his closest approach to depth is "The World of Ptaavs".

      Well, not everything has to be deep. Adventure spectaculars have their own high standard. But they don't hold up to re-reading as well (though better than a mystery does).

      The problem with spectaculars is that it's tough to keep coming up with something even more spectacular than last time. And it takes a slightly different skill to write a good enough adventrue novel to make up for the lack of a new spectacular. (Also the audience is slightly different.)

      It's not that Niven is past his prime, it's that he's not writing spectaculars any more. For awhile I think he also got into a kind of "The Kind can do no wrong" kind of headspace, or perhaps his editors just became timid. Anyway, I found "The Children of the State", and his other works from around the same period to be essentially unreadable, but a few years later he was writing good adventrue novels again. (Perhaps he was just learning that a spectacular shouldn't be forced?)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:Niven is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like Herbert's Dune books #3+, Asimov's Foundation books #3+, and every other sequel written years after the original success

      Wrong. (Unless you meant strictly greater than three...) Some parts of Children of Dune were written before Dune was ever released, and certainly before its success.

      Asimov's Foundation trilogy was published as short stories... the stories which became Second Foundation were certainly written in sequence with the first two books - they answer the cliffhangers of the first two books (what happens with the Mule, what's with the Second Foundation.)

      As for the quality of the later books... I thought that Children of Dune was the weakest of all the Dune books, but that the quality improved later - none of them have the compelling quality that the original has, but they gain a lot of depth. I'd recommend reading either: 1) Dune only; 2) Dune and Dune Messiah, or 3) All of the Dune books actually written by Herbert.

      Asimov's later Foundation books... they are good, but they are a significantly different style, and fall into world-connecting. Even the two prequels are enjoyable - but they are very different: they tell the story of people, not histories and ideas.

    3. Re:Niven is dead by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      As you detected from my phrase "every other sequel written years after the original success
      "
      , I mistyped "#4+" as "#3+". The original trilogies are some of the best ever written. Somewhere there are three brief pamphlets examining the power of the trilogy, and the inevitable failure of their expansion. Even the Lord of the Rings, actually 6 books published in 3 volumes, qualifies, as does the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, most of Piers Anthony's series, and many other "speculative fiction" about "past/present", "fantasy/science".

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  19. Ringworld would make a great movie by b4rtm4n · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Once Nivens wordiness is removed Ringworld and Ringworld Engineers would make GREAT sfx movies.

    Halo gives a hint of how good the concept is visually.

    On the literary front I think Niven suffered horrendously from his collaborations with Pournelle. The books make good intro sci-fi but read like childrens fiction now. I also think that Gentry Lee diluted ACC's work to a childlike level.

    Any way imho Iain M Banks writes THE best modern Sci-Fi.

    --
    "goatse? What's that? Anyone have a link?" - AC
    1. Re:Ringworld would make a great movie by jeff+munkyfaces · · Score: 1

      Halo is not what i hoped a "ring-world" would look like.. probably reasonably accurate (the faint curve disapearing into nothing) but not particularly exciting. A much smaller ring would be far more interesting, although perhaps at photorealism on the big screen it would be more impressive (certainly plenty to do a few good flybys of) Any yes, Iain M Banks does write the best modern sci-fi. but check Richard Morgan - Altered Carbon was superb, Broken Angels not so, haven't read the last yet.

    2. Re:Ringworld would make a great movie by Rational · · Score: 1

      I really liked Ringworld when I was much younger, but I really hated The Ringworld Engineers, and haven't dared read any of the rest. Then I discovered Iain M. Banks and my standards of quality in Sci-Fi moved to a different galaxy altogether. Banks's Orbitals make a lot more sense than full-blown Ringworlds anyway :)

      PS. For a nice example of a Banks Orbital, play Halo.

      --
      "Be nice, veer left, and never stop thinking" Iain Banks - Walking On Glass
    3. Re:Ringworld would make a great movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Culture Novels by Banks are good, i especially
      like "Use of Weapons" but try reading "The Reality Dysfunction" by Peter F. Hamilton or "Hyperion" By Dan Simmons and your Quality standards will move again.

    4. Re:Ringworld would make a great movie by ScruffyBear · · Score: 1

      I love Banks!!! I have a pre-print copy of Use of Weapons signed by him. I got it by sending in a form at the back of one of his books. You had to be one of the first 50 to send it in. It must have been somewere areound 1990-1991. The actual book came out in March/April of 1992.

    5. Re:Ringworld would make a great movie by Rational · · Score: 1

      Oh, I did. The Night's Dawn trilogy was very good, but the unrelenting unpleasantness (even from the point of view of somebody who loves Banks) means that I'll probably never read anything by Hamilton again. I was glad when it was over.

      As for Hyperion, the first book was indeed a revelation, but the second book was, to me, such an abomination and a betrayal of the first one that I've given up on the series for good.

      --
      "Be nice, veer left, and never stop thinking" Iain Banks - Walking On Glass
  20. Does he run Windoze !! by iMaple · · Score: 2, Funny

    But being home with a virus this weekend, and having run out of new Anime DVDs to watch, I thought it was time to catch up on some reading.

    Does he mean he had a cold or flu or does he use M$ products ??

  21. The luck gene by devphil · · Score: 4, Informative


    only briefly appears in the Ringworld series, and then only to nudge the plot along. It plays very very little role in Children. Good thing too, because he tried to make it play too much of a role in Throne.

    He has one other short story using the gene. It's the "future-most" of the Known Space series, set centuries after the Ringworld quartet. The lucky humans have learned about the manipulation, and how to make use of this uncontrollable unpredictable power.[*] It's an amusing story, but not up to Niven par.

    He said it would be the last story focusing on the gene, because it creates characters more powerful than the author. Likewise, while the Pak are some of his most interesting and popular creations ever, it's incredibly hard to write good stories when the characters are more intelligent than the author or the readers.

    [*] For those new to the books: just because you're lucky doesn't mean you have any say over what the luck does to you or those around you. Say, you break your arm in a three-car wreck, and while you're in the hospital, you meet your future spouse. Lucky for you overall, not necessarily so much for others.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:The luck gene by rk · · Score: 2, Funny
      while you're in the hospital, you meet your future spouse. Lucky for you overall, not necessarily so much for others.

      Yeah, especially for your current spouse.

    2. Re:The luck gene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He said it would be the last story focusing on the gene, because it creates characters more powerful than the author.

      Cowardice! Whinging! Pathetic!

      He says it's too hard. He says it's difficult. Bah. Every story since the beginning has has a central figure that must struggle against adversity. He says it's too hard to write a story where luck is the focus.

      It's just too hard for him.
    3. Re:The luck gene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say, you break your arm in a three-car wreck, and while you're in the hospital, you meet your future spouse. Lucky for you overall, not necessarily so much for others.

      You must not be married.

  22. Just finished reading by esconsult1 · · Score: 1, Informative

    I too was dissapointed with the second ringworld book. This one is all Vintage Niven. Its worth the wait and the read

  23. Interview responses? by devphil · · Score: 1


    Do you happen to have a link to the thread with Niven's answers? I've been searching, but Slashdot's search engine is utterly fucking useless.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  24. alternate title: by sporkums · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ringworm's Children

  25. Hard SF by SparklesMalone · · Score: 1

    The best hard SF these days is Ben Bova - at least until Kim Stanely Robinson comes out with Purple Mars.

    1. Re:Hard SF by dragonard · · Score: 1
      The best hard SF these days is Ben Bova - at least until Kim Stanely Robinson comes out with Purple Mars.

      Don't know what planet you're from, tovarisch, but I'd hardly call Robinson's Mars books hard SF. Scientifically based, sure, but packed full of sociological and metaphysical sputum (especially the last one).

    2. Re:Hard SF by SparklesMalone · · Score: 1

      sociological I'll agree with but metaphysical? Maybe he's a dreamer, but aren't all SF writers? But I was talking about the excriating detail of things like where the shorelines of the oceans would be, what a terrorist-snipped space elevator impact would be, etc. I really enjoyed a short story he wrote once about some rock climbers tackling Mons Olympus. His research is meticulous. But yeah, he did get progressively sentimental. Hence the comment on "purple". Maybe I should have said "violet paisley".

  26. Silly Mods.... (slam them in metamod people!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... posts posted at the same time can't be redundant.

    1. Re:Silly Mods.... (slam them in metamod people!) by BizidyDizidy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The purpose of moderation is to make the reading of the comments as enjoyable as possible. You're not being punished, it's not a race.

      --
      The safest way to approach lava is to have another person with you and he goes first.
    2. Re:Silly Mods.... (slam them in metamod people!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am i missing something? Does a redundant moderation not affect Karma? (Not that most people don't have enough to make it almost irrelevant)

  27. Re:OT: How many web servers does slashdot have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oops, I meant *twice* as many. You know what I mean.

  28. *bzzzt* by devphil · · Score: 4, Interesting


    I expect that _Ringworld's Children_ is [uninformed wanking deleted]

    Fortunately for all of us, you're wrong. Children is nothing like Throne. Niven lurks on some mailing lists; he's well aware that the 3rd one was a disaster compared to the first two. He knows exactly what people did and did not like about it. He took it into account when writing this one.

    In fact, in the prologue to Children, he gives credit to one particular mailing list for giving feedback.

    But actually reading the book would be too hard for you, I guess, so you just move straight to the flaming.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:*bzzzt* by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nah, I felt so badly burned by 'Throne that I reacted with a retch on hearing the news of an undying franchise. If you can show me a quote from Niven showing his awareness of its disastrous quality, then I'd consider reading it. And so might many more of us, lurking on these threads, who haven't seen that important bad turn unstoned. Do us all the favor of giving us a second chance at a once-great author, rather than just flaming back.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    2. Re:*bzzzt* by devphil · · Score: 1


      Google for fithp@aol.com postings, if you'd like to see what he's written. (That was the address he used, years ago. Eventually it went the way of all unfiltered AOL addresses, and today probably receives more spam in a 24-hour period than I can store in my house. Dunno what his address is these days.)

      --
      You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    3. Re:*bzzzt* by nessus42 · · Score: 1
      If you can show me a quote from Niven showing his awareness of its disastrous quality, then I'd consider reading it.
      If you ask me, you seem pretty closed-minded, given that you have been presented with a number of people who claim that they hated the previous book but love this one.

      |>oug
    4. Re:*bzzzt* by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      My mind closed to Niven when I read his later books cashing in on his SF brand, and especially ones he didn't even write, like "Man-Kzin Wars", which were innovative in their brand cash-in, but really crappy books. The *one* post in which the poster claimed not only that *they* hated 'Throne, but loved 'Children, but also that Niven had recognized the error of his ways, opened my mind enough to offer to follow up on that lead.

      I've been reading SF for decades, during which the quality of writing has declined along with the discretion of its readers, proportional to the scale of the audience. I don't know how many people who love 'Children wear Spock-ears (or name themselves after one of his characters) while they surf Slashdot, but I'm willing to give 'Throne a chance, if the defect in Niven, that I believe I've identified, has been fixed.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  29. Re:Dont need to RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOD UP +1 Insightful!!!!

  30. Being Old by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I like the fact that I was able to read and enjoy both Ringworld, and the rest of Known Space, near to the time frame they were written. They may be dated now, but so am I (or at least I've just dated myself). I still remember feeling how it might have felt like to stand on the floor of the Ringworld myself when I first read it. I've never had that feeling from any of the following books, but still remember it fondly. I feel sorry for modern readers who may never have that experience.

    I'll certainly read this new book at some point soon, though it is too much to hope that it can fully rekindle my first encounter with Mr. Niven's writing.

    Sometimes there's an advantage to being older.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  31. Re:Interview responses by Sloppy · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  32. My opinion. by Visceral+Monkey · · Score: 1

    I *love* the Ringworld and everything about it. Niven is one of my favorite authors of all time. Having said that.. This book was simply *horrible* when compared to his first 2 (hell, even the 3d one). The entire thing feels like he was looking for an "out" for the series and pieced together something just to meet a publishing requirement. Talk about Dues Ex Machina. He makes a big deal in the preface about "leaving the garden gate open so others may enjoy it" when ending a series so others can romp and continue to dream about that universe. Hard to do when you first lace the entire garden with SALT on your way out. Some of the things he does go against "canon" from previous books and is explained with such a half-assed effort as to be laughable. I'm all for correcting mistakes when needed (remember the spill mountains, spill pipe and attitude jets?) but this was done with characters and done POORLY. I was bitterly disappointed, he could have done so much more had he simply put some effort into it. So help me, if he screws up the "Smoke Ring" series I'll scream.

    --
    *Fortitudo, aequitas, fidelitas.*
    1. Re:My opinion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dues Ex Machina

      A clever pun?

  33. Destiny's Road? by toddestan · · Score: 1

    Granted, it's been a few years since I read that book, but I recall liking it. Granted, it's not one of my favorite Sci-Fi books, or even my favorite Larry Niven book (that would probably be Integral Trees), but why do people pan Destiny's Road so much? Is it just that people put really high expectations on whatever Larry Niven writes?

    1. Re:Destiny's Road? by Visceral+Monkey · · Score: 1

      It wandered too much. I remember getting to the part that had "speckles" recipies and I just groaned and stopped dead in my tracks. Didn't pick it up for another 2 years. Not horrible, just scattered.

      --
      *Fortitudo, aequitas, fidelitas.*
    2. Re:Destiny's Road? by devphil · · Score: 2, Interesting


      The ideas were absolutely top-notch (it's in the same story universe as Legacy of Heorot, Beowulf's Children, and the really early A World Out of Time), and the characters were pretty good, but the writing was sloppy. Names of people and places get changed, for example, like he decided to change the name but didn't quite finish the search-and-replace.

      --
      You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    3. Re:Destiny's Road? by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1

      Destiny's road was very different from Niven's usual fare. I think because it was so different from what people expected, they reacted. In my personal opinion, Destiny's Road was one of his best.

      Bork!

  34. Re:I'm gonna read it...R. A. Heinlein by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    But the sequels fell into the Asimov trap of trying to tie everything in Known Space together after they were written with obvious discrepencies.

    I thought that was the Robert A. Heinlein trap. [G]

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  35. Ringworld Builders by klausner · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've always had a problem with the Pak as the builders of the Ringworld. They would have realized that it would just become a canvas for endless clan warfare on an enormous scale. It is also too fragile, and inherently indefensible.

    Of all the races that Niven introduced, I always thought that the Tnuctipun were the best candidates. If a bunch of them survived the Slaver War in stasis, they might be paranoid about travel and exploration. Look what they discovered last time! They also like to mess aroung with the genetics of things, which would explain all the variation among hominids. The Pak could have come later, and killed them or chased them off.

    1. Re:Ringworld Builders by Visceral+Monkey · · Score: 1

      That's a good theory and one I never considered. Don't forget one reason the Pak built the ringworld was because it was immune to the radiation from the core explosion and they were from that area originally so had first hand knowledge of it.

      --
      *Fortitudo, aequitas, fidelitas.*
    2. Re:Ringworld Builders by klausner · · Score: 1
      But the radiation protection only applies to ~1/2 the circumference. The rest is exposed. And if the core explosion lasts more than a month or so (which it would), more of the ring is gradually exposed over time.


      Plus don't forget: The ring is portable, even without FTL. If the Pak built it as a radiation refuge, they would have started moving out of the galaxy as soon as it was done to stay ahead of the explosion's wavefront. Just like the Puppeteer Fleet of Worlds did.

    3. Re:Ringworld Builders by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      The Pak would see nothing unusual about the Ringworld being wracked by endless clan warfare, as that's what they were accustomed to. As far as they were concerned, that's the way life was.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    4. Re:Ringworld Builders by klausner · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean they see it as desirable. If they were going to do a construction project of literally stellar magnitude, they are intelligent enough and compulsive enough to design something that would not put their descendants at risk.

    5. Re:Ringworld Builders by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      From Ringworld Engineers, the fall of the civilization, and thus the warfare, was due to the Puppeteers' meddling (planting the virus that ate all the superconductor material that all the technology depended on.) It was not due to the actions of those living inside the ring, and therefore was outside the scope of what the Pak predicted for.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    6. Re:Ringworld Builders by klausner · · Score: 1

      You are correct on the cause of the fall. Another reason that the Pak aren't the builders. They would immediately have started fighting among themselves without outside assistance.

    7. Re:Ringworld Builders by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1

      There's an easier solution. They probably just oriented the ring so the edge was facing towards the core. The 1000 mile high walls would make excellent radiation sheilds.

    8. Re:Ringworld Builders by klausner · · Score: 1

      That only works for the half of the ring closest to the core. The outer half is still exposed. And as the ring rotates....

    9. Re:Ringworld Builders by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1

      Not if the entire ring is on it's side. 1000 mile high walls cast a big shadow.

    10. Re:Ringworld Builders by klausner · · Score: 1

      Not big enough for a diameter of 200 MILLION miles.

    11. Re:Ringworld Builders by ppanon · · Score: 1

      I've always had a problem with the Pak as the builders of the Ringworld. They would have realized that it would just become a canvas for endless clan warfare on an enormous scale. It is also too fragile, and inherently indefensible. Niven tries to address this in the latest book.

      Of all the races that Niven introduced, I always thought that the Tnuctipun were the best candidates. If a bunch of them survived the Slaver War in stasis, they might be paranoid about travel and exploration.

      And I always thought that the Pak protector stage couldn't evolve in conjunction with the tree-of-life virus. What's the evolutionary pressure on the tree-of life retrovirus to make it act and continue to act as a trigger for such a massive change? I always thought it made much more sense that Pak were the tnuctip stormtrooper-style bioweapons for their revolution against the Thrint. As you say, They also like to mess around with the genetics of things.

      Pak look harmless, smell good, and are tasty in their breeder phase so they could be spread throughout the galaxy like Bandersnatch. When exposed to Tree-of Life virus they become extremely protective of the remaining breeders and are xenophobic towards everything else (that would likely be Thrint-controlled - except maybe Tnuctip?). And Pak breeders have the latent capability of developing mental shields against Thrints (see World of Ptaavs); perhaps that means Pak brains are partially based on Thrint brains, and the shield normally becomes active in the protector stage?

      Wouldn't the realization that breeder Pak across the galaxy are almost old enough to turn into protectors be enough to force the Thrint to take the ultimate step they did? Hmm, there should probably have been more traces of ancient Pak fossils though.

      However, neither of us are named Larry Niven and he seems to see things in a different way.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    12. Re:Ringworld Builders by ppanon · · Score: 1

      The civilization that fell when the superconductors died was not the Pak civilization, it was the Machine People's. Harloprillalar's civilization. They would have risen much later than the fall of Pak civilization.

      Perhaps the rebellion led the remaining pact loyalists to the conclusion that keeping things as they were was too dangerous and that the Ringworld was better off with an absolute minimum number of protectors to avoid future internecine wars. That might have led to the eventual genetic drift as the number of protectors dropped below the amount necessary for continued genetic pruning.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    13. Re:Ringworld Builders by klausner · · Score: 1

      Very nice chain of thought. When I proposed the Tnuctip to Niven as the ring builders, he pointed out that they are carnivores, and not very nice themselves. So raising Pak breeders for food might be reasonable.

    14. Re:Ringworld Builders by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      The Pak didn't administrate the ring. They created it and left it for their successors to use. Therefore the Machine People's civilization was the original inhabitants.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    15. Re:Ringworld Builders by ppanon · · Score: 1

      Not according to the latest Ringworld novel. While the reason of the loss of Pak control of Ringworld is unclear, it seems very likely to have been involuntary.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
  36. Do I know for CERTAIN that it's impossible? by Plural+of+Mongoose · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Erm, nope.

    However, in any good book / movie / story / date on a friday, there is one important element:

    Suspension of disbelief

    Without that, you got nothing!

    I have a hard time believing in a 'lucky' gene.

    --
    The last fucking thing you want is my undivided attention...
    1. Re:Do I know for CERTAIN that it's impossible? by devphil · · Score: 1


      So does Louis Wu, on and off for two and a half volumes. Niven doesn't exoect anyone to take it at face value.

      --
      You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  37. 3 outta 4 ain't bad... by Kredal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I loved the first two ringworld books, couldn't stand the third, and liked this one.

    Half of the third book was about inter-species sex. (I forget the word for it, and I really don't care). In the fourth book, it's mentioned a couple times, happens a couple times, but is much much much much less prevalant than in the third.

    This one brings in more cool tech, some spiffy plot resolvers, and a few new tricks for Louis Wu. Thankfully, there is also plenty of backstory in the first few chapters, so if you gave up on the third book, or it's been 10 years since you've read it, you won't have to read it again to get into this one. Dunno if it's worth hardback price though... might want to wait until it's released paperback.

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    1. Re:3 outta 4 ain't bad... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      inter-species sex Rishathra, and it's kind of similar to what married couples do as they get old & ugly

  38. Re:Hard SF Rainbow Mars by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Kim Stanely Robinson comes out with Purple Mars.

    So you didn't like Rainbow Mars?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  39. rish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I might check it out if they cut down on that rishathra nonsense.

    I swear, sometimes niven is even more of a dirty old perv than even heinlen.

  40. My Best Memory of Mr. Niven by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Informative
    My favorite memory of meeting Larry Niven was sitting next to him at a banquet table during a SF convention, and having him pronounce the names of all his species (up to that time), and a couple character names to boot. And he did it too.

    (In "Kzinti", the "K" is silent.)

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:My Best Memory of Mr. Niven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does he actually click his tongue for Gligstith(click)optok?

    2. Re:My Best Memory of Mr. Niven by kindbud · · Score: 1

      (In "Kzinti", the "K" is silent.)

      What about the 's' in Louis? Silent or not?

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    3. Re:My Best Memory of Mr. Niven by devphil · · Score: 1


      Silent.

      All through Engineers, various characters pronounce his name with every syllable equally emphasized, and its written like "Loo-ee Woo".

      --
      You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    4. Re:My Best Memory of Mr. Niven by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      I had a dream that Larry Niven showed up at a friend's wedding (this was a few weeks before the wedding was scheduled to take place, and yes they know each other) with an ice cream cart, and gave ice cream to everyone without explaining why, or who he was. Then he left again. I told my friend about this and she thought it over for a moment and said "you know, that sounds like something he'd do."

      She ended up inviting him just to see what would happen (of course nobody told him about the ice cream dream), but he didn't come. Not surprising considering he probably only had two weeks' notice by the time the invitation arrived.

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  41. WTF? by Dirtside · · Score: 1
    When Larry Niven's Ringworld's Children came out in June, I picked up a copy and it's been sitting on my shelf since. I had been hesitating to read it because I didn't want to be disappointed by it as I had been by some of his other solo novels in the last decade (Destiny's Road, The Ringworld Throne).
    Uh... if you were so hesitant to read it, why did you buy it in the first place?
    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  42. Re:Larry Niven by ackthpt · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Hasn't done anything for me in a while... Donald Kingsbury on the other hand, he writes a great book!

    Someone to add to the stack when I'm done with all the other series on my bookshelf. BattleTech, which I read for years has pretty much died, thanks to FASA going bust after ... uh ... selling the video gaming rights to Microsoft (seems it happened to another Illinois company, subLogic) and the latest incarnation involved dumping the whole timeline and jumping forward 50 years or something. Bah!

    Next I was into Terry Pratchett and have pretty well caught up, though Going Postal will be out in October. The UK (where I get my copies thankyouverymuch) has the usual cool artwork, which bears a striking resemblance to something else.

    (Just had and earthquake while typing this, strong one from the feel of it.)

    I never had much respect for Niven's writing partner, Jerry Pournelle, who I felt put a lot of crock into his columns in Byte and kinda held it against him. (About 15 years ago I told an anonymous person in a chatroom on GEnie that I thought he was a poo-head for not considering the hazzards of debris in orbit, turned out the anonymous was his wife. I hope she tole him ;-)

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  43. About that plot arc reversal by devphil · · Score: 1


    Well, remember which planet they're headed for.

    Remember what happened to that planet in Protector.

    Remember that Pak like to leave stuff behind for contengencies. (cf the advice about searching the prank Stonehenge at the end of Protector)

    There are still possibilities...

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:About that plot arc reversal by Too+Much+Noise · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, the reason for 'reversal' was rather weak - given that the doc could have been reprogrammed. Fear of the puppeteer disconnecting the doc? Then again, why was the puppeteer still needed in the first place?

      I mean, after Niven declared the protectors to be so much driven by their instincts, it sounds rather implausible for one to leave his freshly-smelled descendant on its own (protected by 'luck') when the opposite numbers were already aware of his existence. Needing time to prepare, yes - but that? kind of an extreme case of finding a problem and letting others solve it, I'd say.

      Also, given the presumed existence of a human protector in charge somewhere back home, even the course of action you're suggesting looks shakey. Although I'd rather be more inclined to call that one a bluff - after all, a protector destroys his descendants' ennemies - and that didn't happen to the Kzinti. Hard to keep the story consistent with that line.

  44. Niven and sequels by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1
    They're almost always teh suck.

    Beowulf's Children, The Gripping Hand . . . stank. Particularly since the first books (Legacy of the Heorot and Mote In God's Eye) were just so amazingly good.
    And regarding Niven and flat characters - that's pretty darn standard for Niven. His books really get more life when he's collaborating with another author like Jerry P and Steve Barnes.
    Their book Oath of Fealty was amasingly appropros, particularly with news items such as the Chicago article on /.

    Not that it matters, but in the fantasy/sci-fi realms nobody, but nobody, beats George R.R. Martin.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
    1. Re:Niven and sequels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but The Moat Around Murcheson's Eye was fantastic.

  45. The Integral Trees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My favorite work by lerry niven was the Intergral tree series...there was only two books "integral trees and smoke ring" It was really intersting that he focused on evolution on this one when in the ringworld series seemed to fly on the face of it (humans evolved from space aliens rather then from earth) I have always been disapointed that he never wrote a third book...the story never really ended. And i fear that he never will. These books were never as good of sellers as the ring world crap....well the first ring world was ok and nuetron star is really good.

    stendec@gmail.com

  46. Re:Larry Niven by MadMorf · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    About 15 years ago I told an anonymous person in a chatroom on GEnie that I thought he was a poo-head for not considering the hazzards of debris in orbit, turned out the anonymous was his wife.

    I agree with you about JP.
    I sat next to his wife at the '92 WorldCon, in Orlando, during his talk about reusable space vehicles.
    She is very nice and I think she realizes he is a bit of a prat... :)

  47. Ringworld's Children: excerpt & radio intervie by yow2000 · · Score: 2, Informative
    "Louis Wu woke aflame with new life, under a coffin lid."
    chapter 1 excerpt

    radio interview with Larry Niven on Ringworld's Children.

  48. Re:I'm gonna read it...R. A. Heinlein by Tassach · · Score: 1
    I thought that was the Robert A. Heinlein trap
    I'd argue that Asimov did it first. Foundation's Edge in '82, The Robots of Dawn in '83, and Robots and Empire in '85 were where Asimov started tying the 3 storylines together. Heinlein wrote The Cat Who Walks Thru Walls in '85 and To Sail Beyond The Sunset in '87, although you could say that The Number of the Beast was where he started tying things together, and that came out in '79.
    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  49. Re:A new Ringworld? Excellent! by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    I'm suprised there isn't a slashdot referral link in the front page blurb, or would that be too obvious?

    (Is anything to obvious for /. these days?)

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  50. I dunno about that... by AltGrendel · · Score: 1
    ... keep in mind that Harlan Ellison does screenplays.

    I have alot of respect for his work.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

  51. Plot summary, not a book report by Leperflesh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This review is a serious pain in the ass. It's not really a review: it's a plot summary, loaded with spoilers. We get the general drift that the reader enjoyed the book, but that's it.

    My third grade teacher used to grade very poorly for book reports that were nothing but plot summaries, and so should Slashdot.

    -Lep

    --
    I am allowed to criticize you: you are not allowed to criticize me. Sorry, that's just how things are.
    1. Re:Plot summary, not a book report by collar · · Score: 1

      I totally agree, there is nothing I hate more than a book/movie review that just describes the plot. I dont WANT reviews to describe any of the plot beyond the initial setup,

      I want them to tell me if it was good or not and why. Of course in describing why the it was good it can be necessary to talk about some details of the book/movie but be clever about it and don't just give the whole thing away.

      Nothing annoys me more than seeing a preview for a movie that summarises the first 3/4 of the movie and then flicks up a scene from the end of the movie which allows you to work out what happens in the end. What's the point of going to see it after that.

      Blurbs on books are just as bad sometimes, the first part of the book carries no tension because you know roughly where the characters end up once the meat of the story starts because it's written on the back of the book. At least it it's easy to avoid reading the back of books, there isn't much you can do when sitting in the cinema and another poorly done preview starts up.

    2. Re:Plot summary, not a book report by ppanon · · Score: 1

      While I grant you that I provide a lot of Known Space background and a small plot summary, I would say my review has got no more spoilers than the jacket cover. The summary forms the bulk of the review, certainly, but the last two paragraphs do talk about some of the book's strengths and weaknesses, and who it will likely appeal to.

      Larry Niven doesn't write great literature, he (sometimes) writes stories with interesting plots and plot devices. The review makes that clear and it should therefore also be clear why a literary-style review is inappropriate. That said, my review happened to cover most of the points in the slashdot book-review guidelines, even though I hadn't read the guidelines when I wrote the review :-) I actually was more inspired by Tom Easton's reviewing style in Analog's Reference Library articles. But hey, if you think you've been able to do better since the third grade, go ahead and write your own review.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
  52. Am I The Only Person Who... by 3D+Monkey · · Score: 1

    Am I the only person to read this as "Ringworm's Children"?

    1. Re:Am I The Only Person Who... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, and you're at least the third wanker to say so in posts here. I see you're new, why don't you try reading what other people have posted before doing so yourself?

  53. That one you should know already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember how Halroprillilar (sp?) pronounced his name? Leweewu, as one word: therefore Lou-ee, not Lou-is.

  54. Virus? Anime? Morons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who selects the garbage comments that precede a link to a story? I don't care about this guy's virus, his lack of anime DVDs, or his uncredential expectations on what he expects out of a read of some sf novel.

    It's commendable to post sf book reviews, but links to credible reviews on sfsite.com or somewhere, not some random troll's sob story.

  55. Slaves to the tasp by ylikone · · Score: 1

    I read the first ringworld book a while ago, and didn't find it that interesting... I mean, orgasm inducing weaponry and flying castles!? Only geeks would like that!

    --
    Meh.
  56. I have to thank you all by Xofer+D · · Score: 1

    Yes, thank you for preventing a potential disaster! You see, I just got The Ringworld Throne out of the library, and I was actually going to read it. Apparently you have saved my vision and most of my ability to reason and produce sentences other than "...That's part of my life I will never get back...".

    --
    The Signal/Noise ratio can be improved in two ways. Remaining silent is the OTHER way.
  57. Destiny's Road... by Christopher+B.+Brown · · Score: 1
    ... Could use a sequel.

    It wasn't as "cool" a universe as Known Space, but it was one with characters that were way more "human."

    --
    If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
  58. Which of Niven's work should be made into a movie? by rogerborn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All you namby whining naysayers notwithstanding, Niven's work is generally good reading and hangs together well.

    I am looking forward to reading his new one.

    But if any of his work gets made into a movie and sequels, It absolutely has to be Mote.

    Somebody contact Peter Jackson to see if he's got some time to do this one. Can't think of anyone who could do it better, IMO.

    Other than Niven and Pournelle, I enjoy Christopher Anvil's Kings Legions and Royal Road universe, with his Intersteller Patrol. Guess these kind of stuck to me when I was a kid.

    Heinlein would be good, (SIASL, TEFL, TSBTSS) and Asimov too (his Foundation and Robot series) But we all know what happened to these fine author's work when someone tried to make their novels into movies.

    Now, if you want to read some really exciting and original SF, go to the link below!

    Roger Born
    http://writing.borngraphics.com

    "We also walk dogs..."

  59. Best writers by devphil · · Score: 1


    About your comment regarding Martin and top notch writers...

    Couple years back somebody did the usual readers' survey, Who's The Best (Living and Still Writing) Sci-Fi/Fantasy Author, standard kind of thing. Niven and Martin and the usual suspects were mentioned. Yawn.

    Then the interviewer/journalist went a step further. They took the top five or so authors, contacted them, and asked them the same question.

    All of them answered: Gene Wolfe.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  60. My Review by Sunlighter · · Score: 1

    I read the book about two months ago. I have mixed feelings.

    On the bad side, it's too short and too densely packed. I felt like I was being rushed from one thing to another so quickly that I couldn't figure out what was going on. The book required me to notice very subtle details, when I missed one I felt like ''huh?'' and had to go back and re-read before I realized, "oh, that explains it." I thought Wembleth came off as a pathetic character (although I understand why he had to be that way -- a ringworld native, caught in the middle of battles he cannot be expected to understand -- I still inwardly rebel against it), I thought the very little rishathra that was in the book was unenjoyable compared to what it was in the second and third books, and I thought in a few places that scant attention was paid to the kinds of sensory details that make good fiction seem real.

    On the other hand, some of the ideas in the book were really wonderfully surprising and unexpected. The book succeeds in being mind-expanding in spite of some of its flaws.

    On balance, I can't help but think that if Niven had put a little more time and care into it, it might have been a really great work.

    --
    Sunlit World Scheme. Weird and different.
  61. jack vance big planet first by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 1

    In (i think) the 60s, jack vance had a novel about people who crash on the big planet,which has roughly the surface of jupiter (>>earth) but 1g due to lack of metals. not as technical as ringworld, but the same idea that a lot of wierd things happen in a large space

    1. Re:jack vance big planet first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a lot of wierd things happen in a large space

      You just described the universe.....

  62. Rest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "when I felt I needed to rest again." Read on for the rest. Slashdot must really be short on news if we've got an article about some guy's sleep :/

  63. Ringworld by LTSharpe · · Score: 1

    I tried reading Ringworld once. I read the whole thing although I'm not sure how I managed it. It had to be one of the worst books I've ever read. It's like the author took a bizarre dream he had and turned it into a book. Just too completely bizarre to be of any entertainment value,, except for the kzin, he rocked. Scream and leap!

    1. Re:Ringworld by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1

      I think you should stop reading science fiction, and go back to the "fiction" section of the bookstore. It's easier to imagine places and times that actually exist.

    2. Re:Ringworld by LTSharpe · · Score: 1

      Well I do like the midshipman's Hope series(Nick Seafort Saga) and the Honor Harrington series. Both are quite good and are definitely my idea of what science fiction should be. Basically the 18th century royal navy in space. Hell in the Honor books they even mention looking up one of hte republic of haven's ships in 'Janes' ! I love that kind of thing,,, ie some thread of reference to the real world instead of a completely imagined fantasy.

    3. Re:Ringworld by Mongo222 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that not what Niven fans are after. We LIKE those dreams of fantasy places.

  64. An extra chromosome 23 on every page by purplejacket · · Score: 1

    Sorry folks for some negative feedback about Ringworld Throne here (not Ringworld Children but book #3 in the Ringworld progression). Seeing the Ringworld headline on slashdot just pressed my button and I had to post.

    My first experience of reading science fiction included Niven. I was given a few paperbacks, recommended reading, as a way to get started, having come from a background of reading comic books. One of the books was Protector. What a great book! At the time it was just exciting ideas but now I can describe it as good old fashioned hard SF. The whole concept of the third stage of human development after the "breeder" stage being actuated by the consumption of a strange alien root took hold of my mind.

    Later I read Ringworld and loved that too. Still later I read Ringworld Engineers and for whatever reason it just didn't have the same impact. That was sometime in high school, approx half my lifetime ago.

    Then came recent time. I had just purchased Calculating God and happened to chance upon a used copy of Ringworld Throne so I bought it too. I didn't even know it existed though it was published some years ago. Going home I started reading Ringworld Throne. After about 15 pages I stopped and picked up Calculating God. That book kept me up 'til about 4:00 in the morning it was so good. I finished it the next day, groggy though I was. One small point in the book was about how people with down syndrome have an extra chromosome 23 in every cell. I had forgotten that factoid from highschool biology.

    So, back to Ringworld Throne. I dutifully continued reading it. I slogged my way up to page 99. Then I realized: this book has an extra chromosome 23 on every page! I threw it in the recycler and that was that. I don't think I'll be trying the new Ringworld book.

  65. Ringworld's Children was pretty good by blackholepcs · · Score: 0

    I got it through the Science Fiction Book club as a selection of the month a while back, read it, and was satisfied. I read the original Ringworld a long time ago, and never read Ringworld Throne, but it was pretty easy to pick up the story none the less. I am not a big fan of Niven, but Children wasn't too bad. It was paced fairly well, decent descriptives that put a fairly detailed image in your head, and almost-really-interesting sub plots. My main lack of interest in Niven is, as has been stated by others in this thread, is his lack of character development. He doesn't really do much to make you care about the characters.

    Of course, I don't read much Sci-Fi fantasy. I'm more of a Jordan/Eddings/Goodkind type. The Sword of Truth is really my favorite series, by Terry Goodkind. He really knows character development and sub-plot placement. The only one of his books I didn't absolutely love was Pillars of Creation, but that's because I was really into the main story, and that book is a complete side-track (yes, I know it's story will eventually play a significant role in the future books in the series, but still...).

    Anyway, that's my two cents worth.

    --
    Halitosis - (n.) Halle Berry's Camel Toe.
  66. The 's' in Louis Wu is silent. by Behrooz · · Score: 1

    The 's' in Louis is silent, or so it would appear... I recall Harloprillalar (or one of the other Ringworld characters, I think) pronouncing it as "leewee wooo" in one of the books in... some situation, actually written out like that. I don't recall exactly what, but it was there.

    Surprised the fnard out of me, I'd been thinking of it as "Lewis Wu" up until then, and it kind of caused an identity crisis as one of my primary online nicknames at the time was LouisWu. Having your name change pronunciation out of nowhere is disturbing as all hell, really...

    Reminds me of getting pwned in a spelling bee because I had no idea what "awry" was when they said it. Normal pronunciation can't compete with reading loads of books...

    --
    "We have to go forth and crush every world view that doesn't believe in tolerance and free speech." - David Brin
  67. What a loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He watches anime and runs windows and lets his shit get infected?

  68. Not telling the reader what's going on. by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

    I stopped halfway through Ringworld Throne because I just couldn't figure out what was going on in the story. One thing that Niven does a lot is try to make the people in the book talk to each other realisticly. Realisticly, two people who are both well versed in a subject won't explain to each other every detail of it. They'll leave stuff out. Niven likes to use this in his dialogues, leaving the reader hanging as to what's actually going on until several pages later. For example, in Ringworld Engineers, Louis and Chmee figured out about how the puppeters started the man/kzinti wars, but never said it out loud, and so the reader never figured out what they were talking about at first. It was all spoken about obliquely, and until they confronted the puppeter with it and finally spoke their greivences aloud, you the reader had no freaking clue what was going on.

    Niven would string you along until just the point where it was starting to get a little frustrating that everyone in the story knew what he was talking about, but you the reader did not, and then finally he'd let you off the hook and see the explanation.

    Well, that practice is neat in small quantities. But in Ringworld Throne, it was overused, to the point where I just couldn't keep track of who was where and who had done what in some of the scenes. There were literally fight scenes where someone had hit someone, and I didn't know which was the hitter and which was the hitee. I eventually got frustrated with this and stopped.

    Does Ringworld Children have the same kind of problem?

    --

    Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  69. Re:Jerry Pournelle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I liked his Byte columns a lot more than his books, until he came up with Starswarm

    That is a ***VERY GOOG*** book.

  70. Reminds me of Rendezvous with Rama by Skim123 · · Score: 1
    The Ringworld is like a small slice of a Dyson Sphere, a massive ring with radius slightly larger than 1 AU, spun to simulate gravity on the inside with thousand mile-high side walls to hold atmosphere.

    I'm not a big science fiction reader, but reading the above reminded me of Clarke's Rendezvous with Rama.

    --

    I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    1. Re:Reminds me of Rendezvous with Rama by hplasm · · Score: 0

      Rama was more of a cylinder. The Ringworld was described as 'a ribbon, set on edge in a ring around a candle'. (apologies for paraphrasing)

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  71. Spoilers here and in the parent!!! by ppanon · · Score: 1

    Well I had tried to avoid spoilers in the review but your post and the grandparent post pretty well made that moot, didn't they?

    Yeah, the reason for 'reversal' was rather weak - given that the doc could have been reprogrammed. Fear of the puppeteer disconnecting the doc? Then again, why was the puppeteer still needed in the first place?
    You're assuming Louis is telling the truth. He's unsure whether the "lucky genes" exist but is open to the possibility it may. With his genes mixed up with the Teela Brown lucky genes, his Ringworld descendents are probably pretty safe. In fact if his continued presence on the Ringworld endangers them, his own life may be at risk. Also, suppose that protector Louis foresaw potential futures in Known Space that endangered his other descendants (like the ones in the ARM expeditionary force who would be endangered by another Man-Kzin War). With large quantities of antimatter in play, populated planets are as fragile as the Ringworld.

    A protector is going to have a hard time moving around Known Space incognito, but human Ringworld hero Louis Wu would be less conspicuous with a little cosmetic surgery. What if Louis foresaw something that he could more easily accomplish as a breeder? If nothing else, he can take his genes and spread them around a little more.

    I mean, after Niven declared the protectors to be so much driven by their instincts, it sounds rather implausible for one to leave his freshly-smelled descendant on its own (protected by 'luck') when the opposite numbers were already aware of his existence. Needing time to prepare, yes - but that? kind of an extreme case of finding a problem and letting others solve it, I'd say.
    Louis has shown an ability to resist some Pak conditioning to a limited extent (such as the first time he resisted the smell of tree-of-life root). Again, as a protector he may have reasoned that he needed to turn back into a breeder. For instance, if the head of the ARM is a protector, he'll probably be a paranoid-schizo protector who'll have devised (nanotechnological) defenses for killing any competing protectors before they get within killing distance (i.e anti-protector viruses seeded throughout human space). Going in as a breeder, with a protector-conceived plan, may be his only option. After all, he's already helped take down one insane lord protector, why not a second?

    Also, given the presumed existence of a human protector in charge somewhere back home, even the course of action you're suggesting looks shakey. Although I'd rather be more inclined to call that one a bluff - after all, a protector destroys his descendants' ennemies - and that didn't happen to the Kzinti. Hard to keep the story consistent with that line.
    Given that Puppeteers set Kzinti and Humans against each other, I would expect the Puppeteer species to be first against the wall when the protector revolution comes :-). Puppeteers are much more dangerous than Kzinti, so he's unlikely to bare his soul to the leader of the Puppeteer Experimentalist party. Besides, an idea just occurred to me: what if Louis modified the autodoc so that only his body - and not his brain - had the change completely reversed. He could be playing possum: it would give him time and opportunity to crack the Hindmosts' databases and learn about Puppeteer technology in the same way that Tunesmith did. That would make his claims about being unable to use the mass pointer also a lie so that the Hindmost would believe he needed to go into the 'doc for them to escape.

    Actually the one thing I do have a big problem with is that Niven makes a big deal of needing to put Lying Bastard in Ringworld's shadow to avoid being spotted, and then nobody spots them for the two weeks that Louis is in the autodoc even though they're obviously no longer in shadow!! Hunh?

    --
    Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    1. Re:Spoilers here and in the parent!!! by Too+Much+Noise · · Score: 1

      I agree, too many spoilers already. Sorry about getting carried away. I'll try to keep this more 'neutral' :-)

      However, I don't buy Niven's picture of the possible ARM protector at all - a plotline about some outside race (Puppeteers?) neutralizing the virus everywhere it was left around in Protector would be more believable. First, the para-schizo image is hilarious for a protector - as he's not human anymore (quite different endocrine system, neural system, biochemistry). Heck, by Cro-Magnon standards I might be a sick weakling, but that's kind of irrelevant. Second, my point about Kzinti still being around and kicking stands - think about the current situation, where they are suposed to be outmaneuvering humans again (tech theft, war). No protector would allow it - and if it did happen, it means whoever is in charge in the human space is quite incompetent, thus there's no need for such drastic precautions. And I don't believe the doc was modified in any significant way, either - no time (and the puppeteer would have known it anyway, especially after 2 weeks of being around by himself in his own ship, so too risky). Finally, if a human protector did get to study the puppeteer ship before losing it (or will, as it's going back to human space) then the Ringworld is just as unsafe as ever. And btw, that ship is hardly unconspicuous.

      I guess the main problem with having protectors in the first place is they're supposed to be a lot more intelligent than the author. Makes it kind of hard to predict their actions, especially in complex situations.