Slashdot Mirror


Hawaii Puts Old Computers To Work in Linux Labs

johnp pastes "'As pressure mounts to meet state-mandated educational technology standards, some Hawai'i schools with limited budgets are getting updated computer labs at a fraction of the typical costs.'"

53 of 168 comments (clear)

  1. Wait a Second by rhsanborn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You mean someone realized that they could get a comprehensive solution for extremely little money by NOT buying windows? What a concept. I really hope more schools get Linux labs, even if they already have MS systems. I like the idea of kids getting their hands on something other than MS.

    1. Re:Wait a Second by Randy+Wang · · Score: 5, Funny
      Hey, imagine a Beow- oh, never mind.


      I, too, think it's great that they're setting up Linux labs and it's costing them next-to-nothing, but I don't actually think that's the really important thing, here. While it's great that the kids are being given the chance to sample non-MS software, the money that isn't being spent on software is being spent elsewhere, improving education there within the same budget.


      So, save money on computers, you can afford to pay teachers just a little more, new textbooks can be purchased, and so on. There's a much larger effect than just the adoption of open-source, you know.

      --
      --- Egads, I glow in the dark!
    2. Re:Wait a Second by Zorilla · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Trust me, in school, we had enough of Macs. It's all most schools had in CA if you were lucky enough to have those instead of Apple // computers. Where students could have been learning real skills for future workplaces which most likely use PCs instead of screwing around with Hypercard. Not that intuitive learning on computers was ever encouraged anyway; nobody dared getting ahead of the instructor when they were teaching.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    3. Re:Wait a Second by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd be happy if they were Mac labs even, just something other than MS. Kids need to be non-polarized.

      No, you just want them to be polarized towards something other than MS. I'm not saying that's necessarily a bad thing, but don't kid yourself.

    4. Re:Wait a Second by ArtDent · · Score: 3, Interesting

      TFA gave the impression that that's how they're doing it:

      He said that these labs increase the life of a computer by a few years, because 8-year-old computers can run software just as quickly as newer ones using the open source servers. "Things don't get old as fast," he said.

      I found this article really inspiring. I'd really love work on something like that around here (Toronto, Canada). Does anyone know if anyone is working on this kind of project?

    5. Re:Wait a Second by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean someone realized that they could get a comprehensive solution for extremely little money by NOT buying windows?

      What they should have done is phone up Microsoft and say that they were going to upgrade to a Linux lab for $3,000 instead of the conventional $30,000 and they were going to tell the media about it. Bill Gates would have flown in personally to cut them a "charitable donation" cheque for $31,000 on the condition they go the conventional route. Net profit: $1,000. Staying with Windows is cheaper if you play the game right.

    6. Re:Wait a Second by TeknoHog · · Score: 3, Insightful
      No, you just want them to be polarized towards something other than MS. I'm not saying that's necessarily a bad thing, but don't kid yourself.

      I disagree. I'm a teacher in a mixed Linux/Windows based school. All students learn to use both system for basic tasks like word processing and file management. The ultimate idea is to teach them generally about computers so they are better prepared for whatever new systems they might encounter later.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    7. Re:Wait a Second by AvantLegion · · Score: 2, Insightful
      >> I like the idea of kids getting their hands on something other than MS.

      And that's it. Personally, I don't subscribe to the idea of Linux being superior to everything else. But the idea is to break the "Windows OS is the only OS" notion.

      I remember years ago, when people weren't so tied to "Microsoft this" and "Microsoft that". MS stuff was just one option - often a very good option, but not the sole option.

      That's what we need back.

    8. Re:Wait a Second by Fjornir · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I found this article really inspiring. I'd really love work on something like that around here...

      I, too, would love to see this in my local schools. I think the way to make that happen is a variation on the old "Think globally. Act locally." ideal in that we need to act at both ends of the spectrum. It's awesome that you jumped right to finding something local to act on, but remember that a failure in Hawaii will make a local adoption less likely. So, in addition to your local efforts, here are two thoughts thoughts on global action which would help smooth local adoption.

      Send a few dollars to the Hawaii Open Source Education Foundation, and it doesn't have to be a lot. $10 would help defray printing costs of handouts and cheat sheets for teachers and students. $20 is a significant portion of the cost of a flight between islands. $100 would help replace a blown monitor.

      Contribute time to the projects these guys are using! And by that I don't mean join the mailinglist and get involved in all of the latest flamewars. I mean do some real work: bug-hunt in the areas students, educators, and administrators are likely to find problems in. Propose solutions to non-bug problem areas, and help to revise ideas with other peoples proposals. Write some test scripts. Write some code....

      Peace, Love, Linux

      Chris

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
  2. Nice precident in this by tjlsmith · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As the UoH basically invented computer communications by using a discarded satellite to create the ALOHA system, the basic mathematics of which govern Ethernet and the Internet.

    --
    Mumia Abu-Jamal is *laughably guilty*. Check the evidence.
    1. Re:Nice precident in this by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 5, Informative

      At first I thought this was some kind of joke or something (the ALOHA system? in Hawaii?), but it turns out the above poster is actually right. http://www.laynetworks.com/ALOHA%20PROTOCOL.htm

    2. Re:Nice precident in this by zhenlin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And the Wikipedia entry, to further demonstrate:
      ALOHAnet

    3. Re:Nice precident in this by cynic10508 · · Score: 2, Informative

      At first I thought this was some kind of joke or something (the ALOHA system? in Hawaii?), but it turns out the above poster is actually right. http://www.laynetworks.com/ALOHA%20PROTOCOL.htm

      Well, yeah. They had to develop ALOHA after OUTRIGGER proved to be too unreliable.

  3. not terribly surprising... by Daniel+Ellard · · Score: 4, Insightful
    When you compare "commercial off-the shelf" prices for computers and software with prices of "recycled" computers and free software, of course you're going to see a big difference.

    A more interesting question is total cost of ownership; i.e. how much money this really saves over the long run (factoring in things like the fact that the PTA is probably giving the schools grief because the students are learning Office or similar skills that will help them get jobs... believe me, this happens). I'm sure someone has opinions (and hopefully data) related to that.

    An even more interesting questions is why our schools aren't adequately funded...

    --
    Disclaimer: I work for a company, but I don't speak for them.
    1. Re:not terribly surprising... by essence · · Score: 4, Insightful

      An even more interesting questions is why our schools aren't adequately funded...

      Maybe because most politicians are owned by corporates. And they only want the upper classes to get good education through private schools - therefore cut funding to public education.

      oh, and maybe if so much money wasn't spent on the military and prison systems, there would be plenty left for schools (and hospitals).

    2. Re:not terribly surprising... by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd be surprised if it was some sort of upper class conspiracy; that would require a degree of organisation and collusion that I have a hard time believing.

      Now, as for spending too much money on other stuff, I think you may be right there...

    3. Re:not terribly surprising... by nordicfrost · · Score: 5, Informative

      How can the TCO of Linux possibly be higher than Windows? I manage the network of a small company, with som PCs and a Linux file server. The Windows machines are taking 90% of the work time to manage. The Linux system sits there humming along, while the Windows machines get infected, clogged down and what not. So far, for the company (a small one), the Linux server has cost them 0$ since they recycled an old server, whereas the Windows is 900$ in new hardware for XP + 4 manhours last week trying to remove the about:blank spyware shit. And they are even running in non-priveliged accounts! + Countless more man-hours setting it up, trying to locate drivers etc. Windows has not a lower TCO than Linux, in my experince.

    4. Re:not terribly surprising... by Tlosk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sometimes there are headless conspiracies. Otherwise known as the law of unintended effects.

      Most school systems generate the bulk of their revenue from property taxes. Property taxes are based on the assessed value of the homes.

      This is the difference between "good" schools and "bad" schools. People are also willing to pay a premium to move into one of the "good" school districts, driving the valuations higher, and the taxes higher while at the same time depressing prices in poor districts and driving tax revenues down even more.

      And this is where the conspiracy comes in. State wide fixed per pupil spending would resolve this issue, but the people with the power are the ones that have everything to lose because they currently live in the good districts.

    5. Re:not terribly surprising... by TykeClone · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If you mix Windows computers and school age kids, you invariably get a mess of spyware and viruses making the machine unusable fairly quickly. I think that's just the nature of kids and the software that they like to run and the web sites that they like to visit.

      I'd say that you have a better shot at a lower cost of ownership with a linux machine than a windows machine in this situation.

      School aged kids are adaptable and don't need retraining to learn linux applications versus windows applications. Schools should be fairly agnostic about the applications that they teach anyway. And there shouldn't be many educational programs that lock the schools into using windows.

      20 years ago, Apple was able to fill the schools with Apple II machines while businesses used PCs. There is no reason that schools shouldn't use linux over windows where it makes sense to do so.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    6. Re:not terribly surprising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      LOL. I've been managed a classroom with 16 Windows 95 computers with 0 (zero, none) hours per month to manage it.

      The system drive (C:) were read-only and it was allowed to save files only on D: drive or Windows NT4.0 server in users folders.
      All writes to drive C: were stored only in memory, after reboot - system drive (with all files, registry, settings, software) were exactly as it was at date of original configuration.

      Even more - there were no GHost at thouse times, I've to spend a 45 minutes to wrote a disk duplication via network program on Pascal for DOS !! If worked just fine. To duplicate 16 PCs after reconfiguration it takes only 3-4 hours !

      I tend to believe that you are doing something wrong with your OS.
      It does not matter that OS you are using, it's matter how !!
      Yep. You need to be a Guru to manage Windows network, that's why a lot of admins preffer "user-friendy" *NIX.

    7. Re:not terribly surprising... by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Informative

      The higher TCO is generally put down to having to retrain the admins and users of the systems in question, not to mention the loss of productivity while they become accustomed to the change. Not saying that's the way it happens, just that in my experience that's at least part of the explanation for increased TCO.

      Incidentally, if you're really spending that much time fixing your Windows boxes, someone somewhere is donig something very badly wrong. I've run a few XP boxes for the last couple of years, and have spent a total of maybe an hour fixing problems with them. You're also not comparing like with like - the Linux file server is just sat there serving files. The Windows machines have (it seems) all sorts of clueless users abusing them.

      That said, you'll have to expend a lot less effort if you switch the desktops to Linux, until enough people follow suit that the crapware writers start to target it; then you'll find your users installing all sorts of crap again.

    8. Re:not terribly surprising... by AnyoneEB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That sounds a lot like deep freeze, which the school I go to uses. I believe that because of the way it works, if someone boots off a floppy or a CD they can make permanent changes to the hard drive, but I've never actually tested that.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    9. Re:not terribly surprising... by ClosedSource · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Besides, the future of IT is Linux. Who gives a shit about Office?"

      Well, it's a little early to be sure of that. In any case, most children are not going to grow up and become IT workers and if current trends continue a much smaller percentage will do so than in the last generation.

      If they use Linux when they grow up, they'll be using a GUI and won't know any more about the Unix command line or Unix internals than the average person knows about the Windows command prompt or Windows internals today.

    10. Re:not terribly surprising... by iamatlas · · Score: 4, Funny
      If they use Linux when they grow up, they'll be using a GUI and won't know any more about the Unix command line or Unix internals than the average person knows about the Windows command prompt or Windows internals today.

      AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH..... NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.... IT CAN'T BE TRUE!

    11. Re:not terribly surprising... by Bull999999 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And they only want the upper classes to get good education through private schools

      Books, such as Millionaire Next Door shows "wealth takes sacrifice, discipline, and hard work, qualities that are positively discouraged by our high-consumption society. 'You aren't what you drive,'". Your "average" millionaires live in modest houses, drive used cars, and clip coupons. They do value their children's education and thus increase their spending in that area. So if you value getting a large nice house, a new car and computer every couple of years, and buying other usless crap over your children's education, don't bitch at those who do just because they make you look bad.

      As for people sending kids to the private schools, I think that it'll actually help public schools as they still pay property taxes that fund publics schools, but their kids are not using up the resources of public schools.

      oh and maybe if us geeks don't spend so much on ultra fast computers and other cool gadets, there would be plent left for donating to Open Source Software organizations.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    12. Re:not terribly surprising... by bwy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How can the TCO of Linux possibly be higher than Windows?

      Think Linux on the desktop and not server. For example, try converting a call center from Windows to Linux. The user has several different apps they have to use to access different systems, etc. Suppose your average employee maybe has 2 years of college or less and earns under $10 an hour. Typical person isn't tech-savy, but they've got a Dell or a Gateway at home and they use Win98 or maybe WinXP to do various things.

      Take this user and give them some flavor of Linux at work. You can train them on how to use their apps... but when the abnormal happens, the user is in unfamiliar territory, and an environment that frankly just isn't a friendly as XP. This isn't really a training issue either. Even IT guys like myself admit that things on the desktop are just harder with Linux. You can't just plug hardware in and expect it to work. Installing drivers is not easy. Heck, installing software isn't easy. People say when a Linux desktop locks up, it isn't Linux, it is X or the Window Manager. Explain this concept to your sub $10 an hour employee and teach them to open a shell, kill X, restart, etc? I think not.

  4. Sneaking in through the back door... by Mudcathi · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From the article: "...the (Hawaii Dept of Education) is unlikely to convert to open-source machines itself, because the schools get big discounts on service for proprietary software. Although the open-source programs are free, technical support is not," (Rodney Moriyama, assistant superintendent of the DOE's Office of Information Technology Services), pointed out, "so the DOE would have to pay if there were problems with the software. There's actually no incentive for us to do it," he said.

    Apparently, he doesn't realize that other branches of the state gov't feel differently, and are putting out bids to convert from Windows to Linux

    --

    "He who throws mud, loses ground." - proverb

    1. Re:Sneaking in through the back door... by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 2, Informative

      > From the article: "...the (Hawaii Dept of Education) is unlikely
      > to convert to open-source machines itself, because the
      > schools get big discounts on service for proprietary software

      This is quite standard microsoft practice with regards to schools. A state or country works out a deal with microsoft whereby they get essentially free access to MS software. It's paid for by the relevant education department, but schools get a package of perhaps 20 CDs of MS software.

      They can be installed at will on any machine within the school, and often on staff personal machines, depending on the details of the contracts worked out with MS and their department.

      It's a good or bad thing, depending on how you wish to look at it.

    2. Re:Sneaking in through the back door... by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's a good or bad thing, depending on how you wish to look at it.
      In the same way that getting a deep discount on your first two hits of crack can be a good or bad thing, depending on how you look at it, right? :P (Sorry, couldn't resist).

      I would like to see some open-source based companies do exactly what Microsoft is doing; after all, if pre-loading school kids with Microsoft product experience is considered beneficial to Microsoft in the long run, why would the same model not apply to RedHat? Granted, RedHat and others don't have lots of expensive products to sell, but having more people in the population that have been exposed to open source will probably (long-term) create more demand for their services and products.

      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
  5. bumper sticker... by GillBates0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    My l33t hax0r student just 0wn3d your honor student's Windoze boxen.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  6. Cool! Brings back highschool memories. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Cause in 1991 when I was on "business computer" class in Kaneohe, HI (east side of Oahu) we were running some crusty old 386 machines w/ MS Works. We still had quite a few old Tandy comptuers with 8" floppy drives in the room too. Though nobody used them.

    My first taste of the internet was in sept. 1990 on these NAPLS terminals w/ 1200bps modems they were brand new but right after 2400bps modems came out. But every school and state library had at least one. They connected to an X.25 PSDN called "Hawaii FYI". There was a taxpayer funded chat service on the system, as well as links to the state lib, U of H and some state info systems.

    I met some uni students who then turned me on to MUDs, though you had to break out of the library system to get on the net cause there was no public ISP back then. Unless you counted the university system, but then you had to go to Keller hall in the middle of the night. I actually got to meet a member of LoD while messing around online who was at the time an admin for Santanfe.edu. Oh man this brings back memories!

  7. Great.... by gr8fulnded · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now that's out of the bag, Redmond will be on the phone by the end of their week with their Hawaiian office to offer "discounts" to the schools.

  8. Yay for recycling... by jedimark · · Score: 3, Funny

    And they smegging well should too.
    This not only stops certain groups of corporate facist pigs from getting that little bit fatter - using the older computers is good for the environment.
    There's a crapload of toxic waste generated from every circuitboard and chip that is made.
    How much toxic krud came from the crappy computer you are using now? huh? Huh? Go out and plant a tree. ;-)
    Im off to run my super-cluster of older PC's in support of the environment, right after I install that 3-phase power circuit and breath in some more coal fumes...

  9. The computer was actually invented in Britain... by boffy_b · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    Windows is only $500 if your time is worthless.
  10. r'member da kine... by PSaltyDS · · Score: 4, Funny

    I graduated from Moanaloa High School, Honolulu in the 70's. The only computer on the whole campus (besides calculators the size of paperback books with red LED displays and fixed decimal points) was an ASR-33 teletype with a 300bd modem that could talk to a UoH computer. The math teacher would demo some real simple COBOL-looking stuff and cover basic boolean. I remember being very under-whelmed and wondering what anybody outside of NASA wanted with one of those things.

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. - Geek's corollary to Clarke's law
    1. Re:r'member da kine... by Daengbo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe you even da kine da da kine?

  11. Re:Third world schools are doomed! by Hinhule · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The thing is, schools are starting to realize they don't "need" new computers for what they are teaching. Unless they are having classes that require lots of computing power. Most school computers get used for, writing papers, surfing the net, learning basic computing and in some cases a bit of programming. Universities and colleges are another matter though.

    As far as I'm concerned it's a good thing the money can be used in other areas.

  12. Re:Third world schools are doomed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "I also realize that no body owes the third world a living."

    We may not "owe" them anything, but being human beings, people *deserve* to have basic needs met. To deny those who live in poverty while living in luxury seems terribly hypocritical of our "humanitarian" Western society.

    Seriously, the main thing that guaranteed the well-being of many of us was a spin of the cosmic roulette wheel: we were born in countries with economies that allow us to provide for ourselves. Hundreds of millions of people don't have that luxury.

    And honestly, in response to those who may complain about the United States' current economy, I don't mean to undercut those who are actually suffering, but ask yourself this: Are you going to bed hungry tonight? Are you going to *a* bed? In a mostly dry and comfortable place? You have it better off than many. :o(

    Clark

    P.S. So what are we going to do about it?

  13. Only desktop boxes? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    How could they resist the temptation to say .. "Notebook'em Danno!"

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  14. Re:Great but... by PeterBrett · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Everything I've seen under linux is backend server stuff; not really the best set up for 6th graders learning the nuts and bolts.

    The first database software I used - well before I started high school - was MySQL. On Windows. Call me wierd, but I didn't find it hard to learn the nuts and bolts of that at all. MySQL is quite well documented.

    Then again, I suppose I was quite a bit more motivated than your run-of-the-mill high-schooler is.

    IMHO, the best way to teach people to use a database is via the backend-to-a-website route. Get them to make a website, and then keep asking them to add/remove/update pages. They'll soon be begging to be taught to add a database backend

  15. learning applications, or learning skills? by ChristTrekker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can learn concepts of point-and-click, copy-and-paste, desktop metaphor, and most importantly how to use a help system on any OS. Schools that take the perspective of "we have to teach them system X because that's what they'll use in the 'real world'" are thinking wrong. Teach kids how to think not just which widgets to click.

    And if they weren't screwing around in HyperCard on a Mac they'd be screwing around in Solitaire on in Windows. HyperCard may not be an application used in business today, but the kids learned some skills that can be applied elsewhere. If the teachers stressed that aspect of it, the kids will be OK.

    1. Re:learning applications, or learning skills? by popdookey · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You put your finger on our current initiatives with the Boys and Girls Club, our DOE, and the Makiki Community Library. We are working hard to create Community Technology Centers by partnering with existing institutions. The computer labs we donate are just a start.

      Teachings computer literacy with a vendor neutral platform like Linux is the most important goal we have for the next few years. Education is not supposed to be about workforce readiness. That should be a by-product of a solid knowledge base.

      Most importantly, teaching computer literacy with Linux does not create a multi-hundred dollar deficit to own the very software you are learning on.

      --
      Success without humility is an indulgence in arrogance
    2. Re:learning applications, or learning skills? by ChristTrekker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed. Our school systems are not trade programs. ("School To Work", "Goals 2000" and similar initiatives notwithstanding.) Schools are supposed to provide a liberal arts foundation for later life. The kids (and their parents) that will whine that "this isn't what I/they learned in school" are the ones that never really learned how to think, regardless what Johnny's grades were.

      Great to hear about your program, btw. Kudos to you!

  16. Stay away from recycled for labs! by jack1254 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm at a high school in Toronto, and sometimes I help with computer maintenance and things like that, and the entire department agrees, computer labs like these, with recycled computers can't stay! We get mabey 15 times more requests for help from those labs than any other in the building! Open-source is great, but look into off-lease Dell's, in the long run, it is much easier to use, and easier to make sure they work, and if you're going open-source anyway, the price is quite reasonable.

  17. Some Deal by twitter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This is quite standard microsoft practice with regards to schools. A state or country works out a deal with microsoft whereby they get essentially free access to MS software. ... They can be installed at will on any machine within the school, and often on staff personal machines, depending on the details of the contracts worked out with MS and their department.

    That's not how they treated Philadelphia and other school systems they sued.

    It's funny how the administrative people are afraid of free software because they are afraid someone is going to have to fix it. No vendor ever back software and all will charge you to fix it. Given M$'s terrible record with visuses worm and all that which has cost everone plenty, the case for reliability is firmly on the free software side and the costs of switching will probably be lower than the cost of continued upkeep, let along upgrade.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Some Deal by ScrewMaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The copyright law should be applied universally," she says. "What is it we're trying to teach these children anyway? Are we teaching them that its OK to steal? The message we need to get to them is that intellectual property deserves to be respected.

      That quote from your Philadelphia link was from some BSA drone, but it could have come from the RIAA, the MPAA or, for that matter, Orrin Hatch. If I were an intelligent kid in that school system, the message I'd take way would be this: "stealing" as defined by (insert favorite industry group / misguided Congressman here} is WRONG WRONG WRONG! Got that? It is WRONG. But intimidation, lying, cheating, and misrepresenting facts and relevant law is entirely okay so long as you're doing it to preserve and protect your cash flow.

      So far as I'm concerned, let big business (and big government) keep their little "social messages" away from our children. This is a tactic long used by organized religions, totalitarian states and, for that matter, tobacco companies: indoctrinate children as early as possible, and as adults they will find it almost impossible to think outside the mental sandbox you've created for them.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  18. Re:Where is the logic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out:
    http://k12ltsp.org/contents.html

    I was skeptical when I first heard about ltsp. Now I use it.

  19. Similar project in Leeds, UK by terrencefw · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Corpus Christi high school in Leeds did this. There's a writeup on Schoolforge UK.

    Sadly, it got pulled. The last I heard of the project was this (quoted from a private email, but it's relevant and I'm sure he won't mind):

    It was working fantastically well. Loads of donated clients running as LTSP terminals, squid, samba, and apache servers handling internet connectivity, logins, home directories, login authentication, profiles and policies (superbly hand crafted for lockdown and high performance), intranet, issue tracking for tech support, cups printer servers in every room with a web interface to allow the teachers to control what the kids can print... 100% uptime etc etc. In short, the best setup I've ever seen in any school - and I've been in loads in my 20 years as an educational software developer. Then the headmaster, against the advice of all the IT teachers, technicians, myself and sundry LEA advisers, decided that the school would do the Thomas Telford GNVQ in IT - essentially an MS office training course. So the whole lot was ripped out (Julian Old is now using the salvaged the client machines as a beowulf cluster up at Leeds Met) and replaced with hundreds of thousands of pounds worth of windows servers, licences and MS office software. You will not be surprised to learn that all the technical staff in the school resigned (to move to more enlightened schools), I withdrew my support, and that the new system is so flaky it is next to useless. The promised increase in exam grades (the kids, according to the Telford brochure, are virtually guaranteed to get at least a 4 C grade GCSE equivalent from the course) has actually resulted in a massive reduction in performance from the kids.
    --
    Like tinyurl, but one letter less! http://qurl.co.uk/
  20. Re:Where is the logic? by Daengbo · · Score: 3, Informative

    They are probably using the servers to forward applications to the client display, which is easy to do under X, though I know that there are many guys from Hawaii active on the http://k12ltsp.org/ mailing list, so they could just be thin clients, but the article makes it sound ontherwise.

    Either way, the applications run on the server, and is displayed on the client, so that's how the old computers work just as fast as new ones.

  21. Watch out Intel by jamesl · · Score: 2, Funny

    The old computers work as well as new ones because they work off of open-source servers.
    Photo caption.
    ... 8-year-old computers can run software just as quickly as newer ones using the open source servers.
    From body of article.

    When the public learns that installing open source software on eight year old machines lets them work as well as new ones, Intel's business is gonna go down the toilet. Dell's gonna be circling the sewer with them.

    Ever wonder what else the newspaper is getting wrong?

  22. Re:Old hard drives from the Air Force? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Informative
    I realize they could be wipped fairly well but I would bet a good amount of money they were not.

    Then you would be wrong. There are DOD standards government agencies have to follow regarding disposal of excessed equipment. If the hard drives can't be securely wiped then they will most likely be shredded.

  23. Re:Real world vs. fanboy fantasies by pnakashi · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hi all, I'm the teacher that runs the lab at Liholiho Elementary, so I guess you could call me the horse's mouth. We're not talking about enterprise level business here, we're talking about a school that must fundraise for a tech budget. I know nothing about the TCO studies you're referring to. I just know what has happened here. With the help of our fantastic Hawaii LUG (HOSEF) and the great folks on the K12OSN email list, we have spent zero, that's $0.00 on support for the year that we've been using K12LTSP. I'm not saying we'll never need paid tech support, I'm just reporting what is fact (not marketing fluff). The great part about being a part of the OSS community is the willingness of people across the globe to help you for free, out of the goodness of their hearts, or their passion for the cause. I wonder if the same would be true from the "M$ community?" It seems like the bulk of the M$ support community is motivated by billable hours. P. Nakashima pnakashi -at- k12.hi.us Computer Teacher Liholiho Elementary School

  24. Re:Real world vs. fanboy fantasies by innosent · · Score: 2, Informative

    While he certainly has an argument with no merit, he does remind me of several studies (which you see mentioned in MS sponsored ads) where Windows Server 2003 out-of-the-box does beat a few Linux distros out-of-the-box. This is not necessarily an issue for Linux users, but it should be for the (commercial) vendors, since unknowing CIOs/CTOs/VPs might take those studies as the final answer.
    I have little doubt that Server 2003 could beat the standard Linux server distros (SLES, RHAS) straight out of the box. MS has decided that they should excel in those tasks with the out-of-box configuration, while the Linux vendors have not, instead focusing on more general tweaks. Any experienced Linux SysAdmin could beat any of those benchmarks with about 5-10 minutes of work, but for obvious reasons, the studies MS uses to advertise don't include that disclaimer. Some of the tweaks that make a great webserver don't make a great file server, database server, firewall, etc. Systems on both sides should be customized for the benchmark, then benchmarked. Out-of-box benchmarks are almost completely worthless, unless you just want to buy something and never touch it, just expecting it to run forever, which is not how any decent IT department works.

    Back on topic, it's easy to see how they could save money. Where I work, we purchase several workstations for client use, and recently purchased AMD Sempron 2200+ systems with 128MB RAM and 40GB HDDs, no CD or floppy (just like a school would want), for $160 each. Add in another $65 for 17" monitors, $5 for keyboard and mouse, and you've got complete systems for $230, with Linux adding $0 to each one. Considering that Windows XP OEM rates are about $80/copy for the Home version, is it really worth spending half as much on the OS as you spent on the computer to run it? Every 2 copies of Windows is another computer without monitor, keyboard, and mouse, and every 3 copies is another complete system.

    --
    --That's the point of being root, you can do anything you want, even if it's stupid.