Slashdot Mirror


iRiver H320 (Almost) Hits The Market

skyshock21 writes "iRiver appears to now be taking pre-orders for their H320 hard drive MP3 player. This is the one with the color screen that was featured on Slashdot a while back. Although it doesn't support .flac files like the Rio Karma, it does support .ogg, in addition to the usual file formats (mp3, .wmv, .asf, .wav) and sports a nifty color screen. There is also a review posted on CNET."

67 of 323 comments (clear)

  1. Battery life? by NETHED · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I for one, don't want a color screen. I want a battery that lasts me a month. I'll deal with a small, effective, elegant monochrome screen.

    Just my two bits.

    --
    --sig fault--
    1. Re:Battery life? by RazzleFrog · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You know I thought the same thing about cell phones until I got my Samsung. The color screen is much easier to read in bright sunlight as well as pitch black night. The battery life obviously suffers but I have a charger at work and at home.

      The iRiver says it has a 16 hour life so figure 10-12 hours realistically. Unless you are flying half-way across the globe I think that should get you to and from work.

    2. Re:Battery life? by garcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What I'm more concerned with is whether or not the battery can be replaced without returning the unit.

      Yeah, it's great to have a Lithium Ion but what happens when it stops recharging? Am I going to be able to easily replace it or am I going to have to return it to the manufacturer only for them to tell me it's out of warranty and there's nothing they can do?

      I have had too many devices' batteries go south without an acceptable replacement route.

    3. Re:Battery life? by OverlordQ · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to the CNET review it get's 16 hours of playback. Which is over twice that of the iPod. That's twice as long with a color screen then the iPod with your 'monocrome' screen.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    4. Re:Battery life? by Shadow_139 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've have one of these for about 3/4 months now, living in Ireland. Had the IHP140 which was cool. Better batt life on this one, and I got a batt. pack that is take any 4xAA batterys. 28:06:42:12 Meow

    5. Re:Battery life? by twbecker · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not twice as long as the 4G iPod. They can get around 12 hours.

      --
      "The problem with internet quotations is that many are not genuine" -Abraham Lincoln
    6. Re:Battery life? by thesp · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, the previous models' batteries can be replaced with a TORX screwdriver, so no reason why the newer should be any different.

    7. Re:Battery life? by Pieroxy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Giving that they usually sell the batteries for half the price of the unit (or close), in a couple of years when yours will stop recharging, you'll rather buy a new unit anyways...

      All these devices are slowly becoming disposable, simply because the turn-over is really quick and the prices are going down.

    8. Re:Battery life? by jspectre · · Score: 2

      if someone had a butt-ugly mp3 player that had 24 hrs of battery life and 80g of storage and it was the same price as a beautiful mp3 player that had 4 hrs of battery life and 10g of storage you'd still get the pretty one? come on. you buy a mp3 player to LISTEN TO MUSIC, not gawk at it's astetics.

      yeah. the ipod is very nice to look at and the interface is pretty much the one to beat. but if you're buying it on looks alone that's pretty stupid. how often do you shove your mp3 player in your pocket/backpack/whatever anyway?

      --

      abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

    9. Re:Battery life? by aardwolf204 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thats just marketdroid speak. I've got a 4G iPod and under "Normal Real People" conditions it gets maybe 6 - 7 hours, which is still enough for a long car trip. Maybe they got 12 hours by putting a 4 MB 64k AAC in the flash buffer and set the ipod on repeat ;)

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    10. Re:Battery life? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Right, and the old 3G iPod can get the same gains with the higher capacity aftermarket batteries that came out. I bought one for $25, I get about 10 hours of life out of it now.

      The iPod's "dismal battery life" was a result of its form factor. Apple used the smallest battery they could to get a minimum of 8 hours playback, so you could listen all day at work. Now that there are millions of uses for batteries that size, many battery manufacturers are creating higher capacity flat batteries that are also mega cheap. Blaming Apple for using the best battery on the market at the time is kind of stupid.

      Incidentally, I will not be replacing my iPod with an iRiver any time soon, because while the colour screen is really cool, the device looks pretty large, has WAY too many click tactile buttons to break and ports that will fill with lint, the visual interface looks pretty dull (reminds me of KDE, ew) and the human interface poorly laid out. It is hard to use tiny little buttons while on the go...that's why the iPod has a huge fucking wheel (and why mine has large, inset, finger sized buttons). Why does everybody else insist on making tiny little buttons and putting them right next to each other? Aesthetics? Who sees the thing when it's in your coat pocket? If you NEED to make some small buttons, at least space them more than a thumb's width apart, so you don't press all of them at once. GOD, why is Apple the only company who can engineer a fucking device that doesn't feel like some sadistic toy?

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    11. Re:Battery life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your story about design and battery improvements is nice. You can make excuses, blame Canada, or fabricate some documents about how Bush was involved in the battery choice, the fact remains... The iPod as sold right now and today, has HOURS less battery life and an increasing amount of "less" features then similar players also available in the market right now. The point of all Apple had available months/years ago is a moot point when they are still making it now and today!

    12. Re:Battery life? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And the battery they're using today is, again, the largest capacity available at that size. And the battery life they get today is, again, 50% higher than what they got last year. So does this mean that the argument is, again, retarded?

      As for having "less" features than the other players: I think it should be obvious to anyone who understands mathematics that the massive deficit in sales between more expensive, "under featured" iPod and its competitors should be proof that these features are not what sell a music device. That the folks that are willing to trade a good user interface for a stack of features and trade weight for battery life are a minority in the market.

      Come on, recording? This isn't 1984. We're not holding our tape players up to the radio speakers. Recording is a very specific task that a music playback device does not need. If you're interested in recording, you probably want a device that was made to do that, not one that had it added on at the last second. FM? I'd never use it and I'd be pissed if they spent development time working out FM when I'd rather they spent it making iTunes even better. I bought a digital music player. I didn't buy a jackknife.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    13. Re:Battery life? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, the iPod has a ton of features I don't need. So really, it's 150% of what I need. If being satisfied with a purchase and not seeing any reason to fuck with it just to add features I don't need is your definition of fanboy, I stand so defined.

      Sorry your needs aren't being met. Maybe that's Apple's fault. Or maybe you have too many needs. Take a long, hard look at why you feel you need feature X: is it because you're doing X all the time and want to continue to do it, or because you might maybe do X, if you did it once and liked it, and want to be able to claim you have X support?

      Incidentally, iPod sales numbers can be mucked with however you like. Analysts comparing units sold come up with different numbers that analysts who compare media player chip sales. Of course, media player chip sales are not a great metric, as these chips go into portable gaming devices, cell phones, and standard CD players. If you buy a cheap-o boombox and happend to discover it's got MP3 support (as I did last year), you're not competing with the iPod. In the only Apples to near-apples metrics we have -- non-convergent Hard drive and flash based media players sold in US, Europe and Japan -- APPL rules by a wide margin. But continue to quote whatever numbers allow you to hate Apple and us obnoxious, smiling fanboys. It will make you feel better about being ignored.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    14. Re:Battery life? by ChuckleBug · · Score: 2, Funny

      If being satisfied with a purchase and not seeing any reason to fuck with it just to add features I don't need is your definition of fanboy, I stand so defined.

      See, around these parts, it's not possible to simply be someone who likes Apple products. If you dare to praise an iPod, or OS X, or anything Apple, you are a MINDLESS FANBOY. It means your house is festooned with Apple bumper stickers and posters, and you fantasize about fellating Steve Jobs.

      On the other hand, if you mindlessly criticize anything Apple, and relentlessly call its defenders fanboiz, you are a clear-headed and objective industry pundit with a license to condescend. You are also a 7337 rebel who understands Apple sucks ass because of its failure to support the ogg vorbis juggernaut.

      So please, drop the pretense of being a reasonable person who is also a satisfied Apple customer. You can't fool slashdot. We know you don't exist.

      Whoops! Gotta go - it's time for us to face Cupertino and pray.

  2. penisbird link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    don't go there

  3. Firmware by The_Real_Nire · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hopefully now that this is about done for the US, they will get their act together and concentrate on the firmware updates for the rest of us, instead of ignoring existing customers.

    1. Re:Firmware by justforaday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      now why would they do that? they already have your money...

      /cynical bastard

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  4. Fine print... by RenHoek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1GB equals 1,000,000,000 bytes, not all memory space available for file storage.

    Euhm, so.... how much space DO we have left? Could be anything really.. Damn marketing speak!

    1. Re:Fine print... by twbecker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is that really a suprise? Pretty much ALL manufacturers use 1 million MB to mean a GB now. My 20GB iPod only has 18.5GB of usable space on it. You'd think they would stop this practice, considering how many "My new x GB hard drive is busted! It only has x-y GB of space!" support calls they get.

      --
      "The problem with internet quotations is that many are not genuine" -Abraham Lincoln
    2. Re:Fine print... by Nos. · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Whatever happened to that lawsuit against hard drive manufacturers. It seems to me there was a group suing Maxtor, Samsung, etc. over this issue. Selling a "120GB" drive and it only having about 110GB of usable space. I did some googling but couldn't find anything.

    3. Re:Fine print... by OverlordQ · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not the Hard Drive manufacturers that need to stop the practice, it's all the users who dont know what a GB is.

      20 GB = 20 * 10^9 Bytes = 20,000,000,000 Bytes
      20 GiB = 20 * 2^30 Bytes = 21,474,836,480 Bytes

      20 GB = 18.5 GiB.

      bar = (foo * 10^9)/1073741824
      Where foo is the Metric GB and bar is the Binary GiB.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  5. Um. by eddy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Although it doesn't support .flac files like the Rio Karma, it does support .ogg,

    That's pretty close to a contradiction since we have both Ogg FLAC and Ogg Vorbis. You meant to say it supports Vorbis? Or is it just plain FLAC files it doesn't support, but Ogg FLAC is fine?

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:Um. by tuffy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That's pretty close to a contradiction since we have both Ogg FLAC and Ogg Vorbis. You meant to say it supports Vorbis? Or is it just plain FLAC files it doesn't support, but Ogg FLAC is fine?

      I don't know of any player that supports Ogg FLAC, much less a hardware one. They're all content to use FLAC's native container format instead. From what I've seen, Ogg FLAC is more of a proof-of-concept format - at least until the Ogg plugins start supporting it.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    2. Re:Um. by hackstraw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A little offtopic, but a rant that I want to express.

      I'm getting sick of the whole container/codec thing. Noone knows whats inside of a .mov, .wmv, .ogg, etc file. I know whats in a .mp3, .wav, .aac or whatever. I have a Mac with the latest Windows Media Player and it will not play all .wmv files. There is no way that I can tell from a filename that I can even view the file after it downloads.

      Every time /. posts an article about a portable music player there is the "Does it play flac and/or ogg?" And then people bring up the specific codecs inside of the .ogg file. If us technoweenies can't get it straight, how can anybody?

      Am I the only one that has issues with these multimedia containers?

  6. Color screen but doesn't play videos? wow... by JustNiz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seems to be a major oversight and a major reason why I wont buy one.

  7. Why no FLAC? by jsweval · · Score: 2

    It seems silly that it doesn't support FLAC, being a device with a large hard drive.

    1. Re:Why no FLAC? by tuffy · · Score: 5, Informative
      It seems silly that it doesn't support FLAC, being a device with a large hard drive.

      FLAC would be nice (and easy to add, since decoding it is all cheap integer ops), but the bitrate of the files is so high that the device would need to keep its hard drive spinning the whole time in order to play them - and that'd kill its battery life.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    2. Re:Why no FLAC? by labratuk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How would that be any worse than playing a wav file?

      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
  8. Semantics, semantics... by irokitt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Almost hits the market" is like "almost pregnant". Doesn't count. After all, Duke Nukem Forever has been "almost released" for about six years.

    --
    If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
  9. US release? by Billy69 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm a bit confused by this. 2 weeks ago I went to my local branch of Richer Sounds and was offered one of these when I asked for an iHP140. The showed me it, I prodded it a bit. So, does this 'taking advance orders' thing apply only to the US release?

    --
    #include "disclaimer.h"
  10. For all those dismissive of the iPod's interface, by burgburgburg · · Score: 2, Insightful
    take a look at the frickin' mess of an interface on this thing! Yeech.

    On a separate note, why are they putting off until a later firmware update the ability to view pictures and listen to music at the same time? Shouldn't that have been one of the top priority jobs? Shouldn't they wait until they have that done?

  11. Why Never An AM Tuner? by jetkust · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Can you radio experts help me out on this one? Why do mp3 players never have an AM tuner? Always FM only, but most talk radio comes in AM, it seems only natural that they would include this. What's the holdup.

    1. Re:Why Never An AM Tuner? by vladoman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Because they all use the TEA5757 tuner chip or similar, this one only has FM capabilities.

      --
      (appended to the end of comments I post, 120 chars)
    2. Re:Why Never An AM Tuner? by iBod · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not exactly sure, but possibly: 1) A built-in AM antenna (ferrite rod type) is too bulky to fit inside the case. With FM you can use the headphone cord as an antenna. 2) The noise generated by the clock signals of the player's circuitry would affect AM reception too much. FM is generally broadcast on higher frequencies than AM and stands up better to interference.

    3. Re:Why Never An AM Tuner? by megalomang · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think the main purpose of the AM tuner would be to achieve Tivo-like functionality on a radio. If you listen to AM talk radio, you would know that there is about 50% content and 50% commercials. To me, this is not an acceptable compensation for my time, therefore I will not listen to talk radio for any prolonged period of time. But if I could Tivo the radio (for a reasonable cost) I would definitely listen to AM more.

      Here is an AM Tivo-like product, but it is $150. The sad thing is that it is probably 80% redundant (except for the AM tuner) with other MP3 players that can record from FM. I don't want a 2nd mp3 unit though. Why can't I pay $50 extra for a nice mp3 player that has the functionality I want?

    4. Re:Why Never An AM Tuner? by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 4, Informative

      2 is wrong.

      AM is more subject to interference than FM due to the modulation method used, not due to the frequency. AM at 88-107 MHz is susceptible to interference just like AM at 560-1600 kHz. AM carries its information in the amplitude of the signal; FM carries it in the instantaneous frequency. Noise is (generally treated as) additive in amplitude, meaning that in AM noise adds directly to the message, while in FM noise only indirectly affects the message via how it changes the instantaneous frequency. In addition, in FM interference is inversely proportional to carrier amplitude, while in AM it is independent.

      The analysis to prove it is pretty complex, but basically - angle-modulation methods (PM and FM) have higher noise immunity by design than amplitude modulation; the cost is they require greater bandwidth. It has very little to do with the frequency they run at.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
  12. A color screen... by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...but no support for video?
    What a waste. If i wanted to look at my digital pictures on a tiny display, i'd look at them on the camera that took them.

    --
    "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
  13. My Opinions by elynnia · · Score: 5, Informative

    I personally got an E340 (40GB, same type) a few weeks back, and - being a 2G iPod owner I have a few comments about the good and the bad: The good: Recording features (internal/external mic, line-in), 40GB, file browser, FM radio, connection to USB Mass Storage devices directly, and -line out-. The bad: Here's where the Apple really beats the iRiver - the buttons make scrolling through a big list of songs/artists/albums slow, very limited settings for EQ, no option to play groups such as -all songs by Artist- (The iRiver, although comes with a -rather bad- databasing application, organises songs internally through the filetree), no LCD Remote (which is standard on the H100 series), no on-the-go playlists, and the LCD turns itself off after 20 seconds (can be changed) to save the battery. Having said that, the E300 series is one of the best MP3 players out there, but if you want ease of use and everything to work together I'd recommend the iPod...if you're a feature-hungry music geek (like me) then the E300 series, IMO, is for you. *~Aly~*

    1. Re:My Opinions by Mant · · Score: 2, Informative

      , no option to play groups such as -all songs by Artist- (The iRiver, although comes with a -rather bad- databasing application, organises songs internally through the filetree)

      That is a bit sucky, I have an iHP140, and I can just go to the Artist option, choose the artist, then under the list of albums there is "Select All".

      Shame they seem to be taking features out of the newer ones.

  14. low price too by blanks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Price starts at 330.00 for the 20 gig player. Not bad, considering this is not just an mp3 player, but a multimedia player.

    16 hours of battery life, but really Im thinking that running the screen at all times would drop that to at least 10 or even 8 hours if your lucky.

  15. Re:For all those dismissive of the iPod's interfac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and if you buy one of these, don't hold your breath for the "later firmware update". i had an H120 for a while, desperately waiting for 2 promised firmware updates (May and June of 2004). finally sold it in August. my major beef was dropped samples during audio line-in/mic recording. this is a major issue that should have stopped release of the product until it was resolved. no reputable audio manufacturer would release with such a bug. anyway, the device worked fine from a player standpoint, just just be away that FW updates will take forever, and responses from iRiver was all but non-existent.

  16. How much space do you need? by sstidman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Speaking for myself, I would not be able to use up 20 GBytes. I'm kind of lame, though.

    For the rest of you, I'm curious ... how much space would be the ideal maximum?

    --
    Send/track messages to 100K people: www.xPressAlert.com
    1. Re:How much space do you need? by Paulrothrock · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'd love a 40 GB iPod because I could also use it as a backup HD. There are several utilities out there that will let you sync files to the iPod automagically. Very handy in the event of a HD crash like the one I experienced two weeks ago.

      Oh, unless of course you're using it with a PC.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  17. H340 listed on their site, too. by DeeKayWon · · Score: 2, Informative
    They're also making a 40GB version as well. But what I'd like to know is, are they going to work harder at making it available than they did for the iHP-140?

    When I was looking for a 40GB player (yes, my music collection plus use as a portable HDD necessitates 40GB for me), I could find quite a few local places that had the iHP-120, but no one who had the iHP-140. Heck, it was even a pain finding any online store in Canada that had it.

    I ended up buying an iPod since I could have it in my hands right when I purchased it, get a student discount and not have to pay any shipping.

  18. AM is essentially deprecated in the US market by sczimme · · Score: 4, Interesting


    When radio first became popular, I believe all stations were AM. When FM technology gained ground and passed AM, the AM market began to decrease. Currently talk radio is the primary reason for using AM, but since a lot of programs are available on AM and FM stations (often the AM will have an FM counterpart) there is a relatively small demand for AM these days. Adding parts/manufacturing expense - thus increasing the cost of the final product - to support AM is seen as a losing proposition (low to negative ROI for the PHBs in the audience).

    I like AM. The signals propagate much further than FM, and late at night one can pull in AM stations from hundreds of miles away. However (for me) this is an amusing sidebar: the [lack of] support for AM wouldn't be a dealbreaker in the MP3 player purchase decisionmaking process.

    /Buzzword Bingo is fun
    /leverage your synergy!

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  19. Flac files are great... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But I'm not sure why you'd want them on a portable system. Can anyone really tell the difference between an OGG file and a Flac file via headphones while riding in a subway, walking in the street, or driving in your car?!

    I consider Flac more appropriate for home entertainment systems.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  20. Re:what rush? by SilentChris · · Score: 2, Informative

    Especially with the Archos mini400 out now. Saw one today and I instantly fell in love. The thing is a geek's dream come true. My credit card is getting quite a workout.

  21. microphone input by StripedCow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When are these portable players/recorders going to include a decent (high-quality) microphone input. I mean, as opposed to offering some cheap 'voice-recorder' option. It would be really nice if I could record concerts, and the like, with near-original sound-quality. Until now, this seems only possible with a Sony MiniDisc.

    --
    If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    1. Re:microphone input by shaka · · Score: 3, Informative

      Funny you should ask that, since all of the iRiver iHP/H Series players have built-in mic, (amplified) microphone input and line-in, as well as (IIRC) S/PDIF in and out, and has had this for years.

      If you need really high quality, just get an amplified mic or external amplifier, or build your own.

      Check your facts.

      --
      :wq!
  22. 'Plays up to 600 hours of digital music' by kaleco · · Score: 3, Funny

    Whoah, sure beats my iPod's 8 hour battery life!

    --
    Prosperity is only an instrument to be used, not a deity to be worshipped. Calvin Coolidge
  23. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  24. Whatever happened to. . . by twbecker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    doing one thing, and doing it well? How many people seriously want to carry digital photos around wherever they go? I just don't get the color screen. I guess it's for the same people that like having a camera in their cell phone. True, the thing has an FM tuner and can record voice and radio. That's good, but it's also bulky, has a relatively poor interface and is $30 more expensive than an iPod, which /.ers already bash for being too pricey. Here's an idea: instead of giving us more bloat, why don't they just make the ultimate music player. One that will playback ALL major formats, has a good interface, and super long battery life. Although my iPod is great, it fails to meet 2 of these criteria. I guess we'll have to keep waiting. ..

    --
    "The problem with internet quotations is that many are not genuine" -Abraham Lincoln
    1. Re:Whatever happened to. . . by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 2

      Whatever happened to... doing one thing, and doing it well? [snip] One that will playback ALL major formats, has a good interface, and super long battery life. Although my iPod is great, it fails to meet 2 of these criteria...

      And you still bought an iPod. Things don't have to do one thing "well" to sell; the iPod does things "not quite as well as you'd like but is kinda slick and people think it's cool" so it sells.

      And as long as people compromise and buy iPods, we'll never see a do-it-all fantastic player made for us geeks, because marketing will force the engineers to put in useless, frilly features like a static graphic display in a vain attempt to take sales away from Apple.

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  25. Bulky? by Scud · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm curious as to why the reviewer says that it's a bit bulky, the difference between it and the 20gig iPod being about 3/8th's of an inch more in depth, and an extra ounce for the 320.

    Not much of a difference that I can see.

    --
    I dream in binary.
  26. Er... by Tomahawk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Er, I ordered one of these yesterday (the site I ordered off didn't have the H340 40Gb version, which is lucky from my credit card's point of view).

    There was no mention of it being a preorder - they had 10 in stock, and it's now in packaging and waiting to be shipped to me.

    So, how is it that they are only taking preorders on something that I have already purchased?

    T.

  27. Storing images by WearyVulture · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Does anybody know if it allows copying images directly from a compact flash card? That is, can I just plug an USB compactflash card reader to it and transfer the pictures? That alone would justify the purchase, since it would replace the need to carry a laptop or a bunch of flash cards.

    Come to think of it, any other player that does support that? I don't need a fancy color screen, just the storage capability.

    1. Re:Storing images by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 2, Informative

      can I just plug an USB compactflash card reader to it and transfer the pictures?

      Come to think of it, any other player that does support that? I don't need a fancy color screen, just the storage capability.

      Belkin makes a Media Reader for the iPod that allows you to transfer images onto an iPod.

  28. Re:For all those dismissive of the iPod's interfac by PeterChenoweth · · Score: 5, Informative
    Anonymous Coward may be an anonymous coward, but he/she speaks the truth. I've had an iHP-120 for about a year, and the "firmware upgrades" have been pitiful or non-existent. The player's hardware is fantastic, the software is the problem. The iHP has several flaws (the shuffle isn't shuffle, files played in a different order than they were copied - but it's always the same order), and iRiver has made several promises over the past 6-9 months that they simply have not met. I will not be buying another iRiver product, I just can't handle a company lying to its customers.

    Don't believe me? http://www.iriver.com/community/notice_view.asp?pa ge=&idx=31&mode=&strque=&field=1 They admit the problems and plan a fix. Never happens. Appology note posted says that they're still working on it, with no date in sight.

    Sometime later they post this... http://www.iriver.com/company/news_view.asp?idx=37 3

    and there is much rejoicing at such a comprehensive list of both defect fixes and user complaints/suggestions.

    And they don't make this date either, with no explanation ("Late July/Early August" != September)

    Sometime later, http://www.iriver.com/support/download_view.asp?id x=609&page=2&p_name=&word=&categor y= finally appears. But compare it's feature set with what was promised. A couple of things were fixed, but gapless playback isn't gapless, it just shortens the time between songs. With all the other mp3 players, gapless playback means that one song fades into the next. Shuffle still isn't shuffle.

    No, I will not be doing business with iRiver anymore.

  29. Re:what rush? by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's a link to Archos Gmini 400. The specs say it works for both PC and Macs. The Archos AV 400 and Gmini 220 look pretty interesting too. The AV 400 looks like it's supposed to be a Portable Media Center for Windows XP Media Center Edition, but it isn't - it doesn't need a computer to record from television. I never heard of these products up until this point, and I think they look like serious competition for the iPod, even for Mac users.

    I don't see why they don't just add stylii to these things so they can also be PDAs. Surely they can function as PDAs if you can install software like games on them. If they did so, these things could compete with PalmPilots, and they already look like they are already good competition for the iPod, Portable Media Centers, GameBoys, and Portable Playstations.

  30. OH COME ON by nobodyman · · Score: 2, Funny

    For awhile now, I've been waiting for a music player that supports ogg vorbis. Not because I want to play ogg files (I have an iPod), I've just wanted to see what the new official slashdot why-i-wont-buy-it whine will be.

    In a million years, I couldn't have predicted "It doesn't have an AM tuner". AM TUNER!?? Are you friggin kidding me?

    Come on, just flat out say that you are never gonna buy one of these things.

  31. Re:For all those dismissive of the iPod's interfac by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No, I will not be doing business with iRiver anymore.

    But...But...But they support OGG! How can any company that supports OGG be poorly run? Could it be that maybe supporting free file formats instead of file formats licensing fees is a way of cutting corners? Could it be that companies that cut corners in some areas MIGHT cut them in others?

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  32. Support hi-rate MP3 encoding without DRM... by ArghBlarg · · Score: 3, Informative

    then I might be interested in any of iRiver's new models.

    A warning to everyone: their flash players are decent, but intentionally cripple their UMS firmware to limit MP3 recording to lower bitrate (well below 128kbps/44.1kHz -- I don't have my player here right now).

    The regular firmware requires their special iRiver Manager program, which tries to prevent MP3 and WAV files being copied back off the device. (Hint: rename your files to .REC before copying them into the MP3/ directory on their flash players -- they play fine, but you can also copy them back out if need be).

    iRiver has always given a totally lame-ass explanation that UMS functionality somehow prevents high-bitrate encoding. Tell me how the USB interface code has *anything* to do with the audio signal path or the A/D convertors used for recording.

    And, as others have said, they promise to ugrade their firmware but it always gets pushed back. Nice players if you like the features they offer at time of purchase -- but don't buy one if you are waiting for one of their 'real soon now' promises.

    --
    ERROR 144 - REBOOT ?
  33. Re:For all those dismissive of the iPod's interfac by kieran · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know it supports MP3 (and I think WAV) as well, right? What format do you consider to be missing?

    Surely it's the players that don't support free formats that are cutting corners!

  34. Re:The beauty of the iPod... by tfoss · · Score: 4, Insightful
    iPod isn't number 1 because it is the best player -- it's clearly not -- not in battery life, choice of format, syncing, or price -- but because the marketing budget on that device is bigger than all the other devices combined.

    I'm not sure you can say it's clearly not the best player, for the simple fact that best player means completely different things to different people. Just to illustrate that, which player is clearly the best?

    To trot out the same old pony of ipod arguments, it's the complete package that makes it so appealing. Sure you can find one's that are smaller, cheaper, higher storage, possess more features, have decent design, better battery life, etc etc....but I have yet to see one that puts all of them together as well as an ipod. Apple certainly chose to make sacrifices in its design, but IMHO they chose the (so far) best set of choices.

    As for the itunes/ipod lockin (aside from the fact that itunes seems pretty well designed, especially for someone espousing WMP10), ipods do *not* only work with itunes. You can get various third-party apps that sync (j river media center, ephpod, xplay) to it. You are only locked into itunes music store if your other store doesn't allow CD burning, or if you don't count real's whole helix situation.

    -Ted

    --
    -=-=- Quantum physics - the dreams stuff are made of.
  35. I second that - MOD PARENT UP by PCM2 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Yes, I bought the iRiver after comparing it with some of the other players on the market. The one I was leaning toward most was the Rio Karma. I decided to go with the iRiver because it seemed to be a more "open" design (it's just a big hard drive, as opposed to the Karma, which requires a Java applet to move files on/off), and because iRiver promised to implement some features and bugfixes in a future firmware. They went so far as to post a schedule of updates on their Web site.

    But then, after I bought the device, they merely posted an apology when they failed to release a firmware on their first deadline date. And then, silence. For months. You can go check out their online forums and you'll see that they are positively filled with irate customers screaming for iRiver to get its act together and release the updates it promised, but as far as anyone can tell nobody from iRiver even reads the forums.

    This was a real disappointment, because in the past I owned an iRiver CD-based MP3 player and their firmware updates were regular, timely, and added all kinds of valuable features, from extended battery life to extra anti-skip protection, etc. It seems clear that iRiver's focus is now on pumping out new products (such as the H320, the market for which isn't entirely clear) rather than satisfying past customers. A real shame.

    Right now, the H-series from iRiver is still missing:

    • Gapless playback
    • On-the-fly playlists
    • A proper shuffle feature (the current one is not particularly random)
    • Level indicators for the record function
    I'm sure other people can point to other bugs and missing features that had been promised earlier.
    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  36. So is there a version of Rockbox for it? by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Or equivalent? http://rockbox.haxx.se/

    If not, I'll pass. If open-source firmware isn't available for it, I'll buy another model that does...