Microsoft To Provide IE Patches for Windows XP Only
Fortunato_NC writes "Microsoft has decided that future IE updates, including those related to security, will only be available to customers using Windows XP. This news.com article has the complete scoop. A choice quote: 'Microsoft may be turning the lemons of its browser's security reputation into the lemonade of a powerful upgrade selling point.' This should provide a huge boost to Mozilla and other alternative browser backers."
This article tries to turn the sow's ear of an overstretched metaphor into the silk purse of a pithy comment, but winds up counting it's chickens in a castle built on sand as the skeletons in the closet come home to roost.
Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
Thank you! Someone who RTFA!
... what, no firefox link? here you go you lazy slashdot editors:
Firefox, the greatest browser EVER!
What they mean is Windows 2000 is completely secure. It does not need anymore fixes. You should be happy that you selected W2K for all your 5000 employees.
So, if there's a safety problem with my 1998 Ford Contour, do I have to upgrade to a 2004 Ford in order to have it corrected?
No, You have to upgrade to a Jaguar with Cosworth Engine, withdraw from Formula One.
-- Hasbullah bin Pit (sebol)
your backdoor is still just as wide open.
You must be the guy that hosts the goatse server
That many? :) And I like Dave's blog's subtitle ... "Internet Explorer moving forward!". Looks like this bugger might have some competition ...
Billy - "We don't have enough people to fix all the bugs in all our products. What can we do?" Well if our corporate customers complain then, hire a city in China to handle all products other than XP.
Microsoft's definition of "SP2 enhancements" is quite vague. They're referring to securtiy features. These "security features" could easily translate to bug fixes.
From TFA: "It's a problem that people should have to pay for a whole OS upgrade to get a safe browser..."
This implies that the older versions of MSIE won't be considered "safe" anymore.
Dear Microsoft,
Damn you! You shot me!
Sincerely,
Your Foot
Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.
Try turning it on!
-=Linsys=-
http://www.intrusionsec.com
What are you all complaining about? The 640 previous patches ought to be enough for anyone.
You have been paying for Software Protection. . .
Yeah, youse wouldn't want anything to 'happen' to yer software, now would you?
KFG
There are lots of them with unusable desktop envionrments, though.
I'll have it!!
;)
How much is the shipping to England?
liqbase
Nobody will ever need more than 640 patches.
Have you read my blog lately?
That's not a Mozilla problem.
It's a powerhouse.co.uk problem.
I will not "need to update" iBrowse/Voyager/Galeon/Firefox/Safari/whatever to IE5, thankyouverymuch. It's Mr Mongoloid Webmaster at Powerhouse who needs to get a clue.
Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
You're new here, aren't you?
Yeah, right.
...and the French just called, they want that Freedom Statue (tm) back again, so please box it up with the bridge.
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
You have been paying for Software Protection, haven't you?
No? Oh, dear. I'm very disappointed in your "business practice". Perhaps we'd better send our consultant, Knuckles, over to give you a hand with your "decision process". After all, you wouldn't want anything "bad" to happen to your machines, would you?
Resistance is futile. Reactance buggers it up.