Slashdot Mirror


Evolution 2.0 Released, Screenshots

comforteagle writes "This seems to be slow getting out, but since Novell hasn't updated their site ... Evolution 2.0.0 has been released. Most importantly it has built in JunkFilter support with SpamAssassin, web calendars, and NNTP support. Oh, and some bugfixes. I've posted some screenshots today as well."

26 of 316 comments (clear)

  1. Remarkably by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Evolution 2.0 was created in a mere 7 days (with 1 of them being for rest).

    1. Re:Remarkably by Skeezix · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually you are wrong. Even more amazingly it was created by millions of monkeys typing randomly on typewriters over billions of years.

    2. Re:Remarkably by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not sure I want to think about monkeys banging their typewriters...

  2. Needs more cowbell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually, this looks so gray and bland compared to Outlook -- needs some color to spice it up -- even on the default theme.

  3. New feature list... by dmayle · · Score: 5, Informative

    It wasn't in the new feature list, but Evolution 2.0 is the one that's supposed to include the GPL'ed Exchange connector, as well as support for Novell's mail server (I forget the name.)

    1. Re:New feature list... by killjoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wonder how hard it would be to take an existing IMAP server and store things like the evolution calender and task list on it.

      In the outlook/exchange paradigm outlook does most of the work. Why not do the same thing with evolution?

      --
      evil is as evil does
  4. Re:For Some reason... by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 4, Interesting

    > Of course it still looks like an Outlook clone...

    That's something that's annoyed me with a lot of apps. What's with the gigantic fischer-price GUIs? are enterprise people attracted to that sort of thing?

  5. Any Chance of by mwagner_00 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Getting this ported to Windows??? I know alot more people would be using it if they did that.

  6. Night Owls by m0rph3us0 · · Score: 4, Funny
    2) Alarms don't work properly if Evolution runs past midnight

    Yeah. That is such an uncommon situation. I can't imagine the lack of forethought that went into the code to allow that bug to ship for a major version release.

    1. Re:Night Owls by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 4, Funny

      They neglected to mention that it also has problems if you expose it to bright light and will unexpectedly fork(2) if you get it wet.

      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
  7. _some_ screenshots by Laxitive · · Score: 5, Funny

    OSDir.com Apps Slideshow Back [ 2 of 84 ] Next


    84? Yeah I suppose some people might refer to that as "some screenshots". May I suggest
    "A fuck of a lot" as an alternate quantifier?

    :)

    -Laxitive
  8. Re:Mono? by oxymor00n · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, rewrite a whole application just for the sake of it. Good idea, really ;)

  9. Document the EDS!! by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 5, Informative

    All this new configurability and extensibility in Evo 2.0 is great, but what I'd really like to see is some better documentation for the "Evolution Data Server" (basically the Camel and Wombat API's). Ximian/Novell are hoping that the community will be excited about writing "snap-ins" to extend Evo's functionality, but what about those of us who would like to, for example, connect it to other back-end data stores? There's a "connector" for Groupwise and a "connector" for Exchange ... what if I want to write a "connector" for some other groupware server? (I'm asking this question because I do want to do exactly that.) These API's are barely documented. You have to reverse-engineer the existing connector code to get anything done with it. I'd like to see some real docs.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  10. Not ready for release? by linuxtelephony · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm really disappointed. It seems they were in such a rush to release 2.0.0 with Gnome 2.8.0 that they left a pretty glaring problem.

    From their Known Issues: 2) Alarms don't work properly if Evolution runs past midnight

    That's a pretty fundamental flaw for a program that is supposed to be essentially an Outlook replacement.

    I commend Novell for their overall Linux efforts, but rushing things to release for the sake of making a date with this type of flaw seems like a dangerous way to conduct business.

    It is things just like this that give some people enough pause to NOT deploy open source solutions. What was the earlier /. article about switching from Linux to Windows saying? Problems with programs, support, etc? Releasing a "stable" 2.0.0, exiting the beta 1.5.x series, and having a problem that prevents alarms from working properly if you leave Evolution running overnight certainly doesn't make me very confident.

    Hopefully 2.0.1 will be released VERY soon.

    --
    . 62,400 repetitions make one truth -- Brave New World, Aldous Huxley
  11. Re:Mono? by noselasd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or why didn't they write it in Python ? Or C++/Qt (Which is Novells preferred platform on Linux/SuSE) ?

    The question to ask is _why_ should they write it in C# ?! I for one
    don't need the extra slowness and memory usage introduced by mono.

  12. But at what cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It would be great for folks to realize that writing apps cross-platform is one of the single best ways to get TONS of adoption, and ease any eventual transitions to Linux.

    Yes, but as OS's (like OS/2 fer instance) found out, having that application compatibility can be a double edged sword. You might ease the transition, but you also potentially negate one of the motivating factors as well as providing your competition (i.e. MS) with a marketing edge (why switch because you can still run your "free" apps on Windows) and (Windows has tons of Windows only apps, PLUS it'll run the open source apps that count).

  13. Cygwin! by Noksagt · · Score: 4, Informative

    Oops! Here's the linky

  14. GroupWise Client Support Added by _Bunny · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It appears that Evolution 2.0 adds some aupport for Novell's mail system, GroupWise.

    There's an article in this month's Novell Connection Magazine on how to set it up, complete with a bunch of screen shots.

    Novell added support to run the GroupWise backend on Linux recently (late last year or early this year, I can't remember). In fact, most of the GroupWise servers this year at Brainshare were running Linux instead of NetWare!

    - Bunny

  15. Re:I use it, like it by kundor · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you want small apps that do one thing, you really should be using KDE. Gnome apps tend to be big monolithic things far more often, whereas with KParts, KDE is entirely made of small one-function apps that embed eachother.

  16. Re:Kmail by KeyserDK · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, not inline(!) though. Which most other mailers seem to use.

    --
    still reading?
  17. Bible Belt by Performaman · · Score: 4, Funny

    I told a Southern Baptist friend about this, and she said I was going to hell.

    --

    I have gas, but my car uses petrol.
  18. Re:Mono? by Phleg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Score: 5, Informative?

    How is this informative? They didn't rewrite Evolution in Mono because that would have involved rewriting hundreds of thousands of lines of code, for little benefit.

    --
    No comment.
  19. Best Calendaring out there... by freelock · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just got Evo 2.0 set up on my laptop, with the new Mandrake 10.1. While I've been having trouble getting my Palm sync'd correctly, I have to say, the new calendar feature is great.

    You can subscribe to the same web calendars used by Apple ICal and Mozilla Sunbird/Calendar. But you can also drag events to a personal calendar, where you can synchronize it with a PDA. You can select any set of calendars to publish for Free/Busy (it looks like it can merge multiple calendars, but haven't tested), and you can then attach the URL for your calendar to your VCard, send to other Evolution recipients AND Outlook users, and they can see when you're available to schedule a meeting.

    I've been waiting for these features for months--it promises to be the best of all worlds for calendaring. Now to see if it delivers!

    --
    Open Source Solutions for Small Business Problems
    Freelock Computing
  20. Re:Mono? by k98sven · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No.. there is no formal connection between Mono and Evolution, although both are products of Ximian.

    A very good read is this piece by Havoc Pennington, of GNOME fame.

    Basically he says that there are ideas that integrating some high-level, sandboxed platforms like Mono/.NET and/or Java into the Linux desktop. (or more specifically, GNOME)

    He also says that they're not going to use Mono or Java in Gnome (and where Gnome goes, Evolution goes) until there is some kind of road-map on which technology should be used and how.

    Personally, I find Java more compelling. C# may be a nicer language, but there is no control over which direction the class libraries will take. The Java Community Process is at least a somewhat open alternative.

  21. Re:Ximian Exchange Connector by daemonc · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not only will it work, but it is now included with Evolution, GPLed, and free of charge.

    --
    All that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream.
  22. Re:Linux apps on Windows by daVinci1980 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    God, I totally agree. I would use Evo in a heartbeat if it were available on Windows. (And no, I cannot switch, I develop products for x86/Windows).

    To the other poster who suggests that it would not be possible, desirable, or easy to support cross platforms... That's total bunk. I used to develop commercial apps that ran on Windows, Linux, Mac/OS9 and OSX. It *does* require a bit more work, but in practice, it's actually not much more work than supporting one OS.

    --
    I currently have no clever signature witicism to add here.