Mel Brooks Says 'Spaceballs' Sequel In The Works
BlueDino writes "Several news sites are reporting that Mel Brooks will release a sequel to Spaceballs. As far as a release date, Brooks says, 'Best case scenario: a week before the new Star Wars opens. Worst Case Scenario: a year after the new star wars opens.'"
This shouldn't be news to anyone, they already told us it was coming.
LONE STARR: Thanks. Well, we'd better get going. I wonder, we will we ever see each other again.
YOGURT: Who knows. God willing we'll all meet again in Spaceballs II: The Search for More Money.
"TK-421, why aren't you at your post?"
we will have a pair of Spaceballs now?...
Lonestar shoots first!
"Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
I remember as a kid when that movie came out there was all these rumors (hey were little kids!) that they were coming out with Spaceballs 3: The search for Spaceballs 2. Anyone else hear that?
Could be the Greatest Movie Ever!
John
My God, they've gone to plaid!
Bryan R.
The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, or $12.50 as seen on eBay.....
If ever there was a series that needed mocking, it's the new starwars series. Anyone who's willing to throw a pie at lucas and his giant ego has got my vote.
ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
...so who will play Barf?
Comment removed based on user account deletion
I thought episodes 1 & 2 were already parodys of the star wars universe.
If Brooks really wants to do a good satire, he'll open SpaceBalls II with a flashback to the Yogurt scene 'SpaceBalls II' and then re-dub the dialogue to have a different title for SpaceBalls. Preferably by one of those bad-asian-flick re-dub voice actors, clearly re-dubbed and badly synched.
It'd be the perfect jab at Lucas's revisional approach to Star Wars...
Yet another classic ruined by an unnecessary sequel.
They didn't even make the movie yet and you're already pissing on it.
Honestly, I hope it blows, and I hope Brooks makes a ton of money, and I hope he makes a third which blows even more, and I want Lucas and Brooks to make a Seinfeldesque bizarro world Christmas special featuring Anakin and Dark Helmet and all their friends that look alike, and I want Kenner to release the special edition "Ruining geek childhood memories" action figure line. I just like seeing all you cranks bitch and moan over pointless things that you have no control over. It's great that you take this all so personally.
I hope that Brooks pokes a little fun at Lucas
by showing a scene from the first Spaceballs with
tons of excessive CGI characters inserted...
God is my Palm Pilot.
I actually worked on the original Space Balls. I was a production assistant at the now defunct Apogee which did the effects for the film.
Apogee was the original ILM near Van Nuys airport, but John Dykstra kept it after ILM moved north. It was cool working there seeing some of the original models of the X-wing in the lobby of Apogee.
But this was way before CGI came to the scene.
"Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
Brooks' stuff is uneven, but some of it is great.
Remember that a great deal of his directoral work is influenced heavily by 30s and 40s movie direction techniques, with long, drawn out pauses, long establishing shots, and great care to extract maximum emotional impact from the viewer. It relies more on in-jokes, subtle ethnic humor, and wild-takes.
Compare to today's comedies, which are influenced by the dramatically shorter attention span created by TV, Video games, and the intrnet. They rely more on extremely visual humor rather than situational humor and cut establishment to the bare minimum. Satires in particular rely on deadpan 'straight man' jokes, at a pace that seems rapid-fire in comparison to earlier works.
I'm not saying one format is better. They're just different formats. Don't group Brooks with the Farelli Brothers or Mike Meyers any more than you'd group Peter Jackson with Alfred Hitchcock.
I submit that 'Men in Tights' would have been an *incredible* film if only it had been edited differently.
The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
That's quite a long jump, 1974 (Fankenstein) to 2001 (Producers).
Isn't it more fair to say that he's had his hits and misses over his 65+ year career?
Of course, it has to be a prequel, about how Rick Moranis becomes Darth Helmet, possibly revealing more backstory about his father's sister's uncle's brother's cousin's roomate.
Must be that instant cassette feature.
Karma: Can only be portioned out by the Cosmos.
Mel Brooks was brilliant when he was teamed up with Gene Wilder. That's why Blazing Saddles and Young Frankenstein were wonderful.
Mel Brooks without Gene Wilder is mediocre at best.
Gotta love it
Newsflash buddy, there's a LOT of people out there who loved Men in Tights.
Yet another ignorant person who assumes that their opinion is fact...
Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
In the future you may want to slide the words "the movie" in there somewhere.