Slashdot Mirror


Mel Brooks Says 'Spaceballs' Sequel In The Works

BlueDino writes "Several news sites are reporting that Mel Brooks will release a sequel to Spaceballs. As far as a release date, Brooks says, 'Best case scenario: a week before the new Star Wars opens. Worst Case Scenario: a year after the new star wars opens.'"

46 of 427 comments (clear)

  1. We knew this.. by xTK-421x · · Score: 5, Funny

    This shouldn't be news to anyone, they already told us it was coming.

    LONE STARR: Thanks. Well, we'd better get going. I wonder, we will we ever see each other again.

    YOGURT: Who knows. God willing we'll all meet again in Spaceballs II: The Search for More Money.

    --
    "TK-421, why aren't you at your post?"
    1. Re:We knew this.. by Wind_Walker · · Score: 5, Funny
      In an interview with Mel Brooks a while ago (on the order of years) he stated that he would not name a Spaceballs sequel "Spaceballs II", but would instead name it:

      "Spaceballs III: The Search for Spaceballs II"

    2. Re:We knew this.. by DarkHelmet · · Score: 5, Funny

      YESS!!!!! I knew this slashdot username would come in handy one day!

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  2. sooo, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    we will have a pair of Spaceballs now?...

  3. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lonestar shoots first!

  4. How about History Of The World Part 2? by simetra · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Really, that's begging to be made.


    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    1. Re:How about History Of The World Part 2? by MustardMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Jewsssss Innnn Sppaaaaaaccceeeeeee

    2. Re:How about History Of The World Part 2? by Noksagt · · Score: 5, Informative
      Whoever modded this and the other Jews in Space post as Troll has obviously not seen the movie. At the end of History of the World: Part 1:
      See Hitler On Ice! See A Viking Funeral! See Jews In Space!
  5. Yay! by slavemowgli · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wow, that certainly is one movie I'll be looking forward to. Let's just hope it'll be able to live up to the quality and humour of first Spaceballs movie instead of ending up as yet another crappy and unfunny sequel; given Mel Brooks' mixed movie history (which included some really funny stuff, but also some rather crappy failed attempts) I'm not sure just what to expect, but I do hope for the best.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    1. Re:Yay! by Bonker · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Brooks' stuff is uneven, but some of it is great.

      Remember that a great deal of his directoral work is influenced heavily by 30s and 40s movie direction techniques, with long, drawn out pauses, long establishing shots, and great care to extract maximum emotional impact from the viewer. It relies more on in-jokes, subtle ethnic humor, and wild-takes.

      Compare to today's comedies, which are influenced by the dramatically shorter attention span created by TV, Video games, and the intrnet. They rely more on extremely visual humor rather than situational humor and cut establishment to the bare minimum. Satires in particular rely on deadpan 'straight man' jokes, at a pace that seems rapid-fire in comparison to earlier works.

      I'm not saying one format is better. They're just different formats. Don't group Brooks with the Farelli Brothers or Mike Meyers any more than you'd group Peter Jackson with Alfred Hitchcock.

      I submit that 'Men in Tights' would have been an *incredible* film if only it had been edited differently.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  6. Haha finally! by TheKubrix · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember as a kid when that movie came out there was all these rumors (hey were little kids!) that they were coming out with Spaceballs 3: The search for Spaceballs 2. Anyone else hear that?

    1. Re:Haha finally! by imsabbel · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, it will be spaceballs 1.
      THe current one will be renamed "spaceballs it was always episode 4"

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    2. Re:Haha finally! by Gudlyf · · Score: 4, Funny

      BAH! They need to star this kid as young Dark Helmet!

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
  7. May the schwartz be with you! by plover · · Score: 5, Funny
    Please let there be lots of killing of the ewok things... please o please... and a JarJar. He's gotta kill a lot of JarJars!!

    Could be the Greatest Movie Ever!

    --
    John
    1. Re:May the schwartz be with you! by beacher · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't forget the evil marketing droid army!

  8. /.'ing Those News Sites by BRock97 · · Score: 5, Funny

    My God, they've gone to plaid!

    --

    Bryan R.
    The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, or $12.50 as seen on eBay.....
    1. Re:/.'ing Those News Sites by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, plaid is what happens when you go fast. The news sites have gone paisley.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  9. I disagree. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If ever there was a series that needed mocking, it's the new starwars series. Anyone who's willing to throw a pie at lucas and his giant ego has got my vote.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    1. Re:I disagree. by EvilAlien · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Thats a lot of people.

      Doesn't Lucas realize that Empire Strikes Back, with screenwriters Who Aren't Named Lucas and a director Who Isn't Named Lucas, was the best of the Star Wars movies? The awful acting out of Mannequin Skywalker and Amidala good have been hammered out with somebody capable of writing good dialog and a director capable of recognizing stale delivery.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
  10. Re:Well we all know the title by semifamous · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, no no.

    That was just kidding.

    This will be "Spaceballs 3: The Search for Spaceballs 2"

  11. Good is dumb by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 4, Funny

    And Evil will always triumph, because good is dumb.

  12. Jon Candy is dead... by JeeNam · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...so who will play Barf?

    1. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by somethinghollow · · Score: 4, Funny

      They'll get John Belushi. Oh, wait. No...

      They'll get Chris Farley. Ah, damn. Not again...

      Maybe that guy from Mad TV?

  13. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  14. Huh? by WPIDalamar · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought episodes 1 & 2 were already parodys of the star wars universe.

  15. What would be hilarious... by ticklemeozmo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is they watch a scene from the original Spaceballs (from Mr. Rental, of course) and during the scene where Vespa picks up the gun, she shoots firsT. ;)

    --
    When modding "Informative", please make sure it both has a source and IS actually informative.
  16. How about a prequel? by raider_red · · Score: 4, Funny

    He could make a prequel that really sucks, but in a funny way.

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
  17. If he's good it won't be the Search for More Money by unlinear · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If Brooks really wants to do a good satire, he'll open SpaceBalls II with a flashback to the Yogurt scene 'SpaceBalls II' and then re-dub the dialogue to have a different title for SpaceBalls. Preferably by one of those bad-asian-flick re-dub voice actors, clearly re-dubbed and badly synched.

    It'd be the perfect jab at Lucas's revisional approach to Star Wars...

  18. Re:History of the World Part 2 by Jacco+de+Leeuw · · Score: 4, Funny

    Obligatory Simpsons quote:

    "You mean Mel Brooks is Jewish??!"

    --
    -------
    Warning: Slashdot may contain traces of nuts.
  19. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by SlashdotLemming · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yet another classic ruined by an unnecessary sequel.

    They didn't even make the movie yet and you're already pissing on it.

    Honestly, I hope it blows, and I hope Brooks makes a ton of money, and I hope he makes a third which blows even more, and I want Lucas and Brooks to make a Seinfeldesque bizarro world Christmas special featuring Anakin and Dark Helmet and all their friends that look alike, and I want Kenner to release the special edition "Ruining geek childhood memories" action figure line. I just like seeing all you cranks bitch and moan over pointless things that you have no control over. It's great that you take this all so personally.

  20. SPACE BALLS I REMASTERED DVD! by Anubis333 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Amazon has a new remastered Spaceballs DVD soon to be released. Aparently it has a lot of new scenes, here's a blurb from Mel Brooks:

    "When we created the original SpaceBalls, we really didn't have enough money or the ability to fulfill my full artistic vision, but thanks to the dawn of computer graphics, the remastered SpaceBalls I DVD will finally allow the public to see my full, unhindered, artistic vision."

    New features include:
    - A CG sidekick Jin Dar Jinx, who beguiles audiences with his slapstick 'off-the-hook' hijinx!
    - A 2 hour space battle.
    - Set extensions created with 3D computer graphics modeled after miniature sets, which were used as matte backdrops in the original film!
    - Computer Generated spacecraft copies of original model spacecraft, now allowing for motion blur!
    - New, more realistic, contemporary, engine sounds for galatic space ships.

  21. Re:Comb the desert, do you hear me... by s_mencer · · Score: 4, Funny

    We aint found SHIT!

  22. CGI Madness by Slendro · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope that Brooks pokes a little fun at Lucas
    by showing a scene from the first Spaceballs with
    tons of excessive CGI characters inserted...

    --
    God is my Palm Pilot.
  23. Revisionist Spaceballs I on TV by YankeeInExile · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Recently, I came across Spaceballs on TV here, with subtitles, and the subtitling sometimes takes liberty with the script - for example to translate idiomatically.

    When it came to the scene where they went to get the video of the movie to see what happened later, the subtitles diverged FAR from the original dialog in a much funnier way. Instead of "home video" the source of the film was....
    Pirates.
    Pirates?
    Yes, Pirates. Piracy has become so rampant, that you can now get a copy of the movie before it is even finished!

    Which is especially funny here, because often you can get pirated VCDs or VHS copies of movies before they're even released locally. The quality is horrendous, and the subtitling is

    WRTN LK PPL TALK IN CHAT ROOMS
    .

    Just for a price-check: A VHS copy of a film is about a dollar eighty, and a VCD is two dollars fifty. DVDs are sometimes burned, and they sell for four or five bucks. Bit-copies of commercial DVDs sell for as much as ten bucks.

    --
    How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
  24. That guy from MadTV by The+Queen · · Score: 4, Informative

    Will Sasso

    He was a brilliant retard in "Drop Dead Gorgeous" and I think he'd make a wonderful Barfolomew Jr. :-)

    --

    The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
  25. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by sgant · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I actually worked on the original Space Balls. I was a production assistant at the now defunct Apogee which did the effects for the film.

    Apogee was the original ILM near Van Nuys airport, but John Dykstra kept it after ILM moved north. It was cool working there seeing some of the original models of the X-wing in the lobby of Apogee.

    But this was way before CGI came to the scene.

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
  26. Re:goody by Wireless+Joe · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Mel's great but he jumped the shark after Young Frankenstein, Blazing Sadles and the Producers.

    That's quite a long jump, 1974 (Fankenstein) to 2001 (Producers).

    Isn't it more fair to say that he's had his hits and misses over his 65+ year career?
  27. Re:goody by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'm not sure if you realize this, but Mel Brooks recently turned his old Producers movie into the most financially successful (and one of the funniest) Broadway shows ever. I paid an ungodly sum for two Orchestra seats, not once but twice, during the recent "revival" of the Nathan Lane/Matthew Broadrick casting, once to bring my mother and once a lady friend.


    Anyway, the point is that while much of his work in the 90s was pure crap, his career can now officially be considered back off life support.

  28. Spaceballs: Episode -1 by hollismb · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of course, it has to be a prequel, about how Rick Moranis becomes Darth Helmet, possibly revealing more backstory about his father's sister's uncle's brother's cousin's roomate.

  29. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by Nexzus · · Score: 5, Funny
    They didn't even make the movie yet and you're already pissing on it.

    Must be that instant cassette feature.

    --
    Karma: Can only be portioned out by the Cosmos.
  30. Mel Brooks needs Gene Wilder by Odd+John · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Mel Brooks was brilliant when he was teamed up with Gene Wilder. That's why Blazing Saddles and Young Frankenstein were wonderful.

    Mel Brooks without Gene Wilder is mediocre at best.

  31. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Funny
    Honestly, I hope it blows, and I hope Brooks makes a ton of money, and I hope he makes a third which blows even more,
    Remember:
    Lonestar: "we're not doing it for the money, Barf"
    Barf: "We're not?"
    Lonestar: "No, we're doing it for a SHITLOAD of money!"
    Gotta love it :-)
  32. Re:goody by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ' Maybe this will be as good as Robin Hood: Men in Tights. Oh wait, that sucked."

    Newsflash buddy, there's a LOT of people out there who loved Men in Tights.

    Yet another ignorant person who assumes that their opinion is fact...

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  33. Re:Mel Brooks, like George Lucas, is vastly overra by neurojab · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >The jokes - like in most Mel Brooks movies - are racial, sexual and excretory. Blazing Saddles was not popular because it was an incisive parody of the western genre, it was popular because it was packed with crass and/or puerile humor. There's no difference between Mel Brooks and the Zuckers, or the Farrellys.

    You ought to give "Young Frankenstien" a try. Sure, it contains a bit of low-brow humor, and some of it is over the top, but overall it is a very incisive parody of a monster movie.

    Of course, It might not be that way if Gene Wilder didn't have his hand in it, but that's beside the point.

  34. Krusty retires by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I dont think the shift in comedy has anything to do with "attention spans," which is at best a ham-fisted word used as a generic complaint about modern times.

    I think the best commentary on modern humor I've seen was the Simpsons episode in which Krusty retires. Krusty's old-school brand of Brooks-like comedy simply grew old and hackneyed. The comedians in this episode were of the typical genx-stock irreverant kind, but also the kind who would look down upon the old Brooks/Don Rickles ethnic-type jokes.

    This commentary is even more interesting as its a Simpsons episode, a show which pretty much defines post-modern humor. Things simply grow old and change. I don't see how the attention span complaint applies here. Its not like Don Rickles was ever known for his long drawn out monologues or anything and a lot of Brooks' gags and movies are pretty far from sophistication. If anything Brroks is a versatile performer/writer/director who can do anything from vaudville-esque comedy to today's postmodern stuff. Although his attempts at the latter do seem to suffer and his best work tends to lean on the "silly, simple gags" side.

  35. Re:goody by pi_rules · · Score: 5, Funny
    Newsflash buddy, there's a LOT of people out there who loved Men in Tights.

    In the future you may want to slide the words "the movie" in there somewhere.