Slashdot Mirror


LotR: RotK Extended Edition Preview Available

Topoimagery writes "After months of speculation and a few low-quality bootleg video clips, we finally get some official video from New Line. The Official Lord of the Rings Site has a preview of the upcoming Return of the King EE in Quicktime format. Here are direct links to the small version (4 MB) and large version (9 MB). Highlights include Voice of Saruman, Mouth of Sauron, Houses of Healing, and Aragorn confronting Sauron. Released date is December 14, and you can pre-order now. (For those of you who can't get enough spoilers, here's a site describing all anticipated new scenes on the DVD)."

56 of 148 comments (clear)

  1. Super Box Set? by TheAntiCrust · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Does this mean soon we get to buy the super box set with all three of the extended editions?? I hope so =)

    1. Re:Super Box Set? by GrAfFiT · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe they should put the DVDs in a spindle, or it just won't fit in the box..

    2. Re:Super Box Set? by Karzz1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know, it is funny, when they announced the latest extended version it would have a list price of ~$40.00 rather than the previous two extended versions list price of ~$30.00. My first thought was "Is that how they are going to justify $100 for the boxed set?". Seriously though, why the price hike for this one?

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.
    3. Re:Super Box Set? by Quixotic · · Score: 2, Informative

      yup, you can order the entire extended edition trilogy from amazon.com. it should be released at the same time as the standalone extended edition rotk.

      --
      --
  2. Endings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    How many more endings does it have?

    1. Re:Endings? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did you see the credits run? What was that? Once? Then it had one ending.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    2. Re:Endings? by hsa · · Score: 3, Funny

      I personally would like to see the ending where they attack Shire and do some killing.

      That ending was probably removed, so they could have half an hour of that cheesy stuff..

  3. Re:How many times more? by BeeRockxs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The director intended the movie to be seen two ways. One version is for the cinema, one is for the home theater, because sitting through a 4 hour movie in the cinema just is not feasible for the average guy, while that is possible in a Home Theater setting.

  4. Pete Said... by Kid+Zero · · Score: 3, Informative

    There won't be a boxed set of all the Ext Editions until the next High Def DVD format is finalized. I guess it means you won't be buying it on a spindle. :)

    1. Re:Pete Said... by geighaus · · Score: 4, Informative

      How come Amazon.com have got it listed then? Will be released on December 14th according to them.

  5. Scouring of the Shire by Xpilot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm sorry Peter Jackson didn't film The Scouring of the Shire. It would have made a nice addition to the Extended DVD, even if it didn't "work" for a box-office feature. The Voice of Saruman, and Shelob's attack are both in The Two Towers, and personally I think Jackson should have filmed it that way, removing the unnecessary Arwen scenes to compensate. But that's just me.

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    1. Re:Scouring of the Shire by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'm sorry Peter Jackson didn't film The Scouring of the Shire.
      Same here... it would also have made for a better winding down of the story. As it stands now, many people complain about the way the movie seems to end 3 times or so. Although personally, I would have hated this movie to end with a bang, say, with the celebration and coronation thingy on top of Minas Tirith.
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:Scouring of the Shire by gustgr · · Score: 2, Informative

      I belive he didn't film The Scouring of the Shire because if he did the movie would have two climax. The first would be The Battle at the Pelennor fields, and the second would be the Hobbits' battle at the Shire. The audience would get [even more] tired IMHO.

      Tough it would be very interesting to see that scenes screenplayed.

    3. Re:Scouring of the Shire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The book (which the movie is supposed to be based on, remember) was NOT an 'action flick'. It was the story of a group of people (the Hobbits) who... grew up. They went from a carefree life to participating in a year-long adventure (even if the movies only seem to cover a few weeks). They went from never leaving their local town to crossing the better part of the known world.

      And, they went from being children, to being adults.

      The Scouring of the Shire IS the climax of the books. It shows that they have, in effect, grown up and are able to stand on their own two feet and take care of themselves. (I'll stop now before the cliche police bust my door down.)

      BTW- did you know the entire battle at Pellenor Fields took only ONE chapter in the book, but almost an hour in the movie?

    4. Re:Scouring of the Shire by gustgr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know how many chapters the battle at the pellenor fields takes at the book, I have read it.

      The point is that the movie needs to make money. If the audience don't like it or gets bored with it, the movie will not be profitable. That's all about Hollywood.

      I don't agree with the movie in several aspects, but I will not mourn or cry because the movie is crap compared with the book. I am just glad I had the chance to read the book before the movies were released, so my visions and imagination were not interfered or messed up by Jackson's point of view.

    5. Re:Scouring of the Shire by UpnAtom · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Arwen story provides a lot of relief from the endless stuggle and angst about Sauron destroying Middle Earth. It also explains the Elves' (lack of) involvement and the Last Ship scene.

      I'd also suggest it adds a subtle magical side to the film, which would otherwise be restricted to Galadriel's mirror, The Ring effects & Gandalf's charge at Helm's Deep.

      Oh yeah, Arwen is also stunning...

      I'd have cut the Aragorn nearly drowning scenes, although they say Viggo nearly did drown. They are utterly useless to the plot.

    6. Re:Scouring of the Shire by jdbo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, the Aragorn almost drowning scenes fo accomplish several things relevant to the plot:

      1. by separating Aragorn from the larger refugees party, he is able to encounter the Uruk-Hai army before Theoden does - this sets up the conflict between him and Theoden, as Aragorn (apparently) sees a greater threat than Theoden does.

      2. Eowyn's belief in his death dramatizes her feelings for Aragorn (something that's much harder to accomplish in cinema than in text).

      3. provides an opportunity to shift away from the Rohan story and reflect on what happening with the elves (otherwise the appearance of the elves would not have made as much sense/had as dramatic an impact.

      While it's certainly acceptable to state that these elements are uncessary changes to the book, they are all set-up and supported by the Aragorn-nearly-drowning "twist". Despite the obviousness to the audience that Aragorn will survive, this plot device actually sets up the second half of the Helm's Deep storyline very well.

    7. Re:Scouring of the Shire by danila · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd have cut the Aragorn nearly drowning scenes

      Check out the Purist Edit. They (and other useless scenes) are cut there.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    8. Re:Scouring of the Shire by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Scouring of the Shire IS the climax of the books. It shows that they have, in effect, grown up and are able to stand on their own two feet and take care of themselves.

      Hear hear!

      My gripe is that one of the points of Tolkien's book is that evil was pervasive and had to be rooted out everywhere. The perversion of the Shire was what brought it all home, and the Scouring is where it was set right through great effort.

      Without the Scouring, the movie makes it look like the hobbits came back from their tremendous struggle to a shire that had sat out the whole war without a blade of grass touched.

      The Switzerland of Middle Earth? Even Switzerland didn't fare that well in WW II. (And they got off as lightly as they did because every last one of them was trained, armed, and prepared to ambush and repell anybody who tried to come through THEIR mountains - quite unlike the carefree fuzzy-footed little villagers portrayed in both the book and the movie.) "Switzerland doesn't HAVE an army - it IS an army."

      By omitting the Scouring but showing the companions drinking together at a pub in an apparently undamaged and uncaring homeland, the movie commits extreme revisionism on the original work.

      Which is not to say it's trash. It's AMAZING that so much of Tolkein's work made it so well to the silver screen. But even if it made the movie "impossible" for the theaters I really think at least some tiny bit of The Scouring should have been filmed and included in the extended edition. (Isn't that what extended editions are for?)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    9. Re:Scouring of the Shire by Lethyos · · Score: 4, Funny
      removing the unnecessary Arwen scenes to compensate

      Yes, how perfectly Slashdot-nerdesque: remove the hot, busty chick with the sheer top so that we can see a bunch of short, fat, hairy hobbits run around and beat up on old wizzards. Sheesh man, get your priorities straight! ;)

      --
      Why bother.
  6. Re:How many times more? by EvilFrog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the movie as the director intended it.

    There have only ever been two versions of each of the Lord of the Rings movie- the theatrical release and the extended release. The extended release reincorporates scenes that were cut out due to time constraints. This has always been the plan, and they've been pretty upfront about it. We all knew this release is coming, and I've specifically held off of buying the theatrical release because of it.

    I'm sure that if Peter Jackson were able to get away with releasing the extended editions in the theatre he would have, but even the theatrical releases clock in at about three hours each. Theatres like to get as many showings in as possible, so there's an (unwritten yet present) time limit as to how long a theatrical release can be.

    I myself enjoy the extended editions- the first two added scenes that I think added to the film. But I can understand that not everyone wants to commit four hours to watching a movie, and thus those people would prefer the theatrical release.

  7. oh boy oh boy oh boy! by ilovelinux · · Score: 4, Funny

    oh man, I can't wait! I'm so exited I think I just pissed myself! Extended edition 3 movie marathon coming up!

    This is going to be awesome!

    1. Re:oh boy oh boy oh boy! by piquadratCH · · Score: 5, Funny
      I'm so exited I think I just pissed myself! Extended edition 3 movie marathon coming up!

      I bet you'll piss yourself a few more times if you watch all three EEs nonstop ;)

    2. Re:oh boy oh boy oh boy! by malex23 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't sweat it... The Ultra Extruded Warchest edition comes with a pair of Depends adult undergarments.

  8. Re:wtf by tajmorton · · Score: 4, Informative

    See the OpenQuicktime Project. They have a bunch of codecs. Or, use CrossOver office.

    --
    Tell the truth and you won't have so much to remember.
  9. Re:They are really milking it with all these DVDs by The+Snowman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems like every other friggin' month they're releasing another special edition of one of these flicks. The movie studio is playing you all for fools, and treating you like mindless sheep who happen to have money.

    Actually, they release a new special edition each year, not every month. Just one per film, no more.

    Any 'Rings' fan who was stupid enough to buy each and every DVD that was put out for this trilogy is too dumb to be allowed to reproduce. Fortunately, anyone who is that rabid a fan of this stuff probably wasn't going to be reproducing anyway, so the universe balances out.

    I bought the first two special editions and plan on buying the final one too, but not any of the "normal" editions. I do not know of anyone who bought all of the versions, that is a stupid waste of money. Some of my friends bought the regular editions, some like me only buy the special editions. That is not stupid. Oh, I did reproduce, sorry universe.

    --
    24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
  10. Re:How many times more? by vondo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Exactly. And, the added scenes are usually intended for the readers of the book more than for the general public. Maybe the best example of this is Galadriel's gift giving scene in the first movie. It was abbreviated in the theatrical release since the whole "Gimli hates elves and turns around to almost worship Galadriel" sub-plot adds nothing to the real plot. But, any fan of the books would be really upset to see this left out.

  11. Re:Super Box Set? YES by hype7 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's the proof

    These guys won't ship outside of Australia, but the "super box set" exists.

    -- james

  12. yes but... by m0RpHeus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, but does it include the very important character and scenes?

    --
    Take-off every .sig! For Great Justice!
  13. Re:wtf by gaj · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The audio codec doesn't like mplayer or totem.
    Works for me with MPlayer 1.0pre5-3.3.4. Perhaps you either need to build a newer version of mplayer, or you need to dload updated codecs?
    God I hate proprietary BS.
    Can't argue with that.
  14. Extended Trilogy Boxed set... by kikensei · · Score: 2, Informative

    has been available for pre-order for weeks.
    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000 654ZK0/qid=1098030658/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/103-701367 5-2021468?v=glance&s=dvd/
    Not a very savvy group of LoTR geeks on Slashdot... ;)

  15. 50 more minutes! by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Funny
    Note to self:
    1)Clear out 1 day to watch LOTR:RTK extended edition
    2)Get those adult diapers that I used last year for LOTR:RTK movie edition out of storage.

    I knew those would come in handy again.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  16. Re:They are really milking it with all these DVDs by gaj · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I don't normally feed the trolls, but since you already did, I'll reply to you, thus maintaining plausable deniability. ;P

    I mostly agree with your response to the troll, but have to differ with you on the stupidity of buying both sets of DVDs. For the record, I've only purchased the extended versions. However, I can certainly understand why someone might wish to own both. If, for instance, they enjoy having friends over to watch movies, but not many of their friends are big enough fans of the trilogy to sit through the extended cut, it'd be nice to have the theatrical release to show instead.

    As for the whole reproducing thing, I am rabid enough a fan to have read the trilogy more than 15 times (I've lost count), to have compiled an pair of Elvish dictionarys back in my early teens by pouring over the text and appendixes of The Hobbit, The LOTR and Silmarillion, I spent a day of PTO to see the theatrical releases on their first day (not quite rabid enough to do the midnight thing, I suppose) ... and yet I have a son. Go figure.

  17. Novel quote from Sauraman: by Tandoori+Haggis · · Score: 4, Funny

    "You are all going to.."

    buffering 1%

    Where is buffering? :-)

    --
    My hyperlinks aren't worth the paper they're printed on.
  18. Looks like someone has side-tracked him then.. by tolan-b · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.ezydvd.com.au/item.zml/229861

  19. Cannot be destroyed? by apocamok · · Score: 3, Funny
    From the linked site http://www.rotk-see.de.vu/ :
    If www.rotk-see.de.vu one day suddenly does not work, try http://home.datacomm.ch/betaversion/index.html . If this site is can not be visited, try alternatively the following URL (this is an other server and can not be destroyed): http://www.hdr-see.de/ - Webmaster Indrid Cold E-Mail

    Cannot be destroyed? Never underestimate the Slashdot Effect...
    1. Re:Cannot be destroyed? by jolyonr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe this 'other server' server needs to be dumped into Mount Doom?

      --


      Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    2. Re:Cannot be destroyed? by malex23 · · Score: 4, Funny

      This URL cannot be destroyed, Apocamok, son of Armageddaman, by any craft that we here possess. The URL was made in the servers of Mount Doom. Only there can it be unmade. It must be taken deep into Mordor, and cast back into the fiery WYSIWYG from whence it came. One of you must do this.

  20. Re:Coming soon by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1) It was specifically said AHEAD OF TIME (though I cannot find the link offhand) that there would be two versions, regular and extended.

    2) The LOTR extended editions have so far proved to be worth the money. I could care less about the behind-the-scenes stuff, but the added scenes are long (50 additional minutes for Return of the King!) and add to the story immeasurably. I particularly liked the extended edition of the Two Towers. The scenes like the flashback with Faromir and his father and the ents at Helm's Deep are so good/important you'll wonder how they ever got cut in the first place.

  21. Not /.'ed ? by gustgr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Before I click on the link to the .mov I tought: "The site will be down for sure, after all, it is LOTR, it is a movie, and it is a DVD preview. The nerds will not forgive". For my surprise the site is still up.

    Are the nerds losing their power to slashdot sites?

    1. Re:Not /.'ed ? by Aero+Leviathan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did you not see 'AOL.com' in the URL? They will handle your pitiful 'Slashdot effect'.

      Oh, I'm afraid the web site will be quite operational, young Skywalker... heh heh he--oh, er, wrong movie.

      --
      ~ Aero
  22. Re:How many times more? by ALeavitt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it just me, or does this argument/rebuttal happen every single time there is a story posted about one of the LOTR movies. Seriously, go back to the beginning, since Fellowship of the Ring Extended Edition was announced, and go back through those posts... I guarantee these will be there, word for word.

    --
    This sig has been stolen. Return it to its original user for a reward.
  23. Zen by chill · · Score: 3, Funny

    What is the sound of ten thousand geeks updating the Amazon.com wish list all at once?

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  24. Re:Super Box Set? YES by yofan · · Score: 5, Informative

    Amazon is taking pre-orders... http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000 654ZK0/qid=1098032871/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/102-014815 8-6872921?v=glance&s=dvd $78 USD. Which is low all things considered. You get 13 DVDs.

  25. Re:They are really milking it with all these DVDs by TomHandy · · Score: 2, Informative

    I agree. I also only bought the extended versions, but I can understand some valid reasons for buying the normal releases too. First off, with various coupons and deals, they could be had very cheap. Secondly, for people who wanted to also have the theatrical cut, it's the only way to get it. And I believe that the regular editions had their own unique extras, etc. - so a real completist might want them for that reason. Again, given how cheap it was/is possible to get the regular versions, I don't think it is totally nuts for someone to go that far. I'm personally more than happy with the Extended Editions though.

  26. Re:They are really milking it with all these DVDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    You compiled your own elvish dictionary, you have a 4-digit UID, and you've gotten laid? You sir, have the life.

  27. So if this is a preview by Laebshade · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does that mean this preview is the original theatre release of LOTR:ROTK? ;)

  28. Re:They are really milking it with all these DVDs by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I bought the first two special editions and plan on buying the final one too, but not any of the "normal" editions. I do not know of anyone who bought all of the versions, that is a stupid waste of money.

    I bought both editions of the first two and am planning to complete the extended set in December (already have the theatrical ROTK of course). Call me stupid if you must but I am willing to shell out the cash for one simple reason: I belive in sponsoring the things that I particularly like. Hollywood doesn't send me a ballot to let them know that I want more LOTR quality stuff, so I vote with my wallet. I don't buy many DVDs, but I felt this series was worthy of an exception. YMMV.

    Oh, and BTW (from grandparent post):

    Any 'Rings' fan who was stupid enough to buy each and every DVD that was put out for this trilogy is too dumb to be allowed to reproduce. Fortunately, anyone who is that rabid a fan of this stuff probably wasn't going to be reproducing anyway, so the universe balances out.

    My wife of five years and I are happily expecting our first child in January and we both have enjoyed the trilogy thoroughly. So, I guess that's just one more moronic theory out the window -- or else the universe is about the end -- I leave it to the reader to judge.
  29. Re:NO GODDAMN SPOILERS GODDAMMIT! by mrscorpio · · Score: 4, Informative

    All the spoilers you need are right in the book, and have been available for over a half-century....

  30. Come not between the Slashdot and his prey... by mav[LAG] · · Score: 4, Funny

    If this site is can not be visited, try alternatively the following URL (this is an other server and can not be destroyed): http://www.hdr-see.de/

    Or he will not slay thee in thy turn. He will bare thy server away to the Houses of Lamentation, beyond all darkness, where thy processes shall be devoured and thy shriviled configs be left naked to the lidless eye."

    --
    --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
  31. Not good enough by ballpoint · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm waiting for the extended edition box set in WMVHD 1080p.

    Please don't mod me Funny: I mean it.

    --
    Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
  32. Two boxed sets by thellamaman · · Score: 2, Informative

    We're talking about two different things here. The link you posted contains just the EEs you can buy individually, plus a box. Nothing extra. Whereas Peter is talking about a "super" EE set, possibly with bloopers and other cut scenes. This will likely come come out on the new HD format in several years.

  33. Re:They are really milking it with all these DVDs by jdbo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I always find it interesting that there's so much fuss about the Star Wars changes (i.e. the unavailability of the original/last versions's footage w/ each new edition); meanwhile, people complain about LOTR's production company making both the theatrical (i.e. original) and EE versions available.

    Somehow, I doubt that the /. population of SW complainers (lack of choices) includes none of the LOTR complainers (too many choices)...

    For those who feel "tricked" into buying the theatrical cut when they could've bought the EE, you're frankly in the wrong. This is one of the few cases where the film producers have been entirely upfront w/ the public about the differences between editions, including pre-announcing release dates for the different releases so that customers could plan ahead. So, if a few people buy the movie twice by mistake - too bad for them. And if you "couldn't wait" for the EE, then clearly the theatrical cut was worth the twenty bucks and there's nothing to really complain about.

    As for those fools (myself included) who deliberately seek out both versions, we're a particular strain of film enthusiast that enjoys watching different versions of the same movie; this can be incredibly educational about the editing process (for example, the studio re-cut of "Brazil" entirely belies the plot and meaning of the original cut of the film, though it uses no different footage; the special edition DVD includes both these cuts plus an alternative European cut).

    Furtheremore, we get a kick from being able to view the movie "the way that audiences first saw it" - at the least this makes later viewing the most updated/remastered/restored/extended version of the film a fresh and more interesting experience.

    So there is a reason to own/view multiple versions of a movie; it may not appeal to some, but there's enough of "us" out here that the DVD market will often cater to this irrational and unnatural desire. ;)

  34. As Terry Pratchett said by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 2, Funny

    I won't reveal the working title of my next book since otherwise amazon will be taking pre-orders for it by tommorrow...

  35. How to connect up with the previous EEs? by Flyboy+Connor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am very interested to see how Jackson manages to connect up with the previous EEs. There are scenes added to the previous two EEs, which are not in the theatrical releases, which will have an impact on scenes already shown in the cinemas. I am thinking, for instance, of the scene where Merry and Pippin drink the Ent's stuff that makes them grow. At the crowning, the four hobbits are standing next to each other. In the theatrical release, the hobbits are of equal length. In the EE, Merry and Pippin need to be at least a head taller than Frodo and Sam! Will new special effects do the trick here?

  36. What About Critical Scenes Cut From TTT? by Lethyos · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm very disappointed that Peter Jackson has decided not to include a very important scene in The Two Towers. One day I hope that future generations will get to see these movies with the badger scenes fully restored...

    --
    Why bother.