Slashdot Mirror


DVB-T STB/MPEG2 Player That Can Access SMB Shares

feanor writes "Siemens is realeasing beginning of November the Gigaset M740 AV (German text). This is a DVB-T set-top-box that can access SMB shares either via ethernet or WLAN and store its MPEG2 compliant streams. Alternatively it can be used as an MPEG2 streaming client. Other cool features include the ability to hook-up standard USB hard-drives as storage, a dual tuner architecture and a very cool design."

149 comments

  1. Not in the US by DaHat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    DVB you say? Shame that's not going to be compatible with the ATSC standard here in the states.

    Maybe, one day such a device will be available here... after the Induce act fails again and is lost forever... after pigs fly, hell freezes over and the {MP|RI}AA and bit torrent get along as friends.

    1. Re:Not in the US by tokenhillbilly · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's really not a question of ATSC in this case. Since the GigaSet is a IP based set top box, it would only be useful for TVoIP applications such as those offered by broadband providers such as the Telco's. Alternately, it could be connected to a cable modem.
      If this becomes popular, somebody will build an ATSC receiver that has and IP output. The issue of course is the CCI (copy protection flag). A decoder would pass this flag to the set top box, but the box would be required by US law to respect the flag and prevent it from offering clear digital signal at it's outputs.
      Since it is DVB, I assume that it supports SimulCrypt, so operating it in a telco environment should be no problem.

    2. Re:Not in the US by Silvrmane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Enough with the acronyms. Messages like this are unreadable to people who don't know what the heck DVB or ATSC mean.

    3. Re:Not in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      hmm, my understanding is that dish network is using DVB devices for its satellite service. so dvb is available in the US. Actually, lots of satellite users are using it.

    4. Re:Not in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    5. Re:Not in the US by jrmann1999 · · Score: 1

      The problem is Encryption of said satellite signals, until this device is authorized by Dish/Echostar it'll receive nothing but FTA(Free To Air) television which is all crap in the USA.

    6. Re:Not in the US by DaHat · · Score: 1

      You think that's bad? You should listen to the people where I work, common acronums include (but of course not limited to: PCR, TS, PTS, DTS, PAT, PMT, ADF, and SD, HD and many many more.

      Bonus points if you can identify each of the above.

    7. Re:Not in the US by crownrai · · Score: 1

      I have found this site to be a good place to lookup acronyms. CrownRai

    8. Re:Not in the US by BeeRockxs · · Score: 1

      It's not only useful for TVoIP, it has 2 DVD-T tuners built in it, you just need to hook up an antenna. DVD-T is the digital terrestrial TV over here.

    9. Re:Not in the US by sokoban · · Score: 1, Redundant

      If you don't know the acronyms, then this probably doesn't pertain to you. DVB-T is the Euopean Digital terrestrial Television standard. It's pretty neat really and allows for digital pay TV over the air. ATSC refers to the american standard

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    10. Re:Not in the US by TheSync · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, they use different modulation techniques. DVB-T uses COFDM modulation, ASTC uses 8 VSB modulation. DVB-S (satellite) uses QPSK modulation (generally).

      My impression, though, is that these formats all use MPEG-2 transport streams. So if you can demodulate them, and deliver them over coax using ASI (asynchronous interface), they would all mostly work with an MPEG-2 TS demux/decoder.

    11. Re:Not in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The DVB standard is designed with modular encryption. A quick trip to GoogleGroups tells me that the Dish Network uses Nagravision encryption, for which there are CAMs (conditional access module). At least theoretically you should be able to watch the Dish Network with a CI (common interface) equipped DVB-S receiver, a Nagravision CA module and of course a subscriber card.

    12. Re:Not in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bonus points if you STFU.

    13. Re:Not in the US by Jagasian · · Score: 2

      It is called "Google". Learn how to use it. Now, what boggles my mind is how your post got rated as "+5 Insightful".

    14. Re:Not in the US by HBPiper · · Score: 1

      Being as I work for a company that supplies products that multiplex, demultiplex, and transform MPEG-2 Transport Streams from one format to another, I can unequivocally answer YES! to your question. We also make/sell products that analyze Streams and do other equally cool but unmentionable things to them.

      --
      "I went on a diet, swore off drinking and heavy eating. And in fourteen days, I had lost exactly two weeks. Joe E. Lewis
    15. Re:Not in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same way that all your comments are getting upped to 2 -> Slashdot's moderation system is crap, and morons like you get heard the loudest.

    16. Re:Not in the US by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 1

      Polymerase Chain Reaction, and I'm just going to guess the rest are also biochem related because I'm a lazy ass.

    17. Re:Not in the US by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Not in this case, I was refering to the meaning as defined in ISO/IEC 13818-1 which is 'Program Clock Reference'

    18. Re:Not in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be guest at a TV studio :) Its all I say...

      "Are you sure you plugged BNC passover of to TBC? I see colour artifacts from DVC Pro feed from Iraq .Also missing vsync"

      heard just yesterday...

      Won't flood here with acronyms but the guy who got flamed about asking what the heck DVB is right.
      I don't think 99% of Slashdotters are TV professionals so, explanation is needed.

    19. Re:Not in the US by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      In fact DVB is never used alone for 'pay tv', its always cryptoworks (Philips) and OpenTV (http://www.opentv.org) involved.

  2. possibly the first on topic reply by InfoHighwayRoadkill · · Score: 1

    This looks pretty cool to me. I was thinking about knocking something together to do something simillar but this seems to make life easier and definately looks better

    --
    another Roadkill on the Information Superhighway
    1. Re:possibly the first on topic reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On topic but, sadly, boring.

  3. And four thousand linux users cry ... by SpooForBrains · · Score: 3, Funny

    SMB?? We want NFS or nothing!

    --
    "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    1. Re:And four thousand linux users cry ... by DaHat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cry all you want, but SMB users still out numbers NFS users.

      I don't intend this to be a flame, just a simple fact of life currently.

      At least with some Samba you can have NFS support, unlike Windows people who hear NFS and are clueless.

    2. Re:And four thousand linux users cry ... by SpooForBrains · · Score: 1

      Yes. It was a joke. Haha, haha, thud.

      --
      "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    3. Re:And four thousand linux users cry ... by sxpert · · Score: 1

      as the thing probably has some version of Linux inside, it's a shame it doesn't *also* do NFS shares...

    4. Re:And four thousand linux users cry ... by operagost · · Score: 1
      At least with some Samba you can have NFS support,
      Samba does not provide NFS support, only CIFS (SMB).
      unlike Windows people who hear NFS and are clueless.
      For your review. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/sfu/
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  4. What SMB? by leomekenkamp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The interesting question is: does it use some sort of windows, or does it use samba to access those shares?

    --
    Wenn ist das Nunstueck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.
    1. Re:What SMB? by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      SMB is how windows computers share files and printers with each other. The OSS version called Samba is an implementation of this that allows *nix computers to do the same. So you can have a windows network and hook up a computer with linux and run samba and get the same access to the files and printers and be able to share your files and printers.

      A little off topic, but I feel windows smb is easy to set up, but it craps out a lot where as Samba can be a pain to set up when communicating to say windows xp machines, but once you get it configured properly it always works.

  5. MPEG2 in the LBC by mwheeler01 · · Score: 5, Funny

    DSB-T STB that plays MPEG2 over SMB and with so much trauam in the LBC it's kinda hard bein snoop D O Double G with my BLT. I'll be hangin over here with my WLAN wearin SPF 30 cause of the UV...

    Am I the only one that had to read the title and description like 4 times to get the gist of this? I know acronyms are a fact of life but I think my brain is starting to overload on them.

    --
    Pretty widgets? What pretty widgets?
    1. Re:MPEG2 in the LBC by awtbfb · · Score: 4, Funny


      I know acronyms are a fact of life but I think my brain is starting to overload on them.

      I guess you're SOL.

    2. Re:MPEG2 in the LBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DOOH...WTF?

    3. Re:MPEG2 in the LBC by nizo · · Score: 1

      Firefox needs a browser plugin that automatically links acronyms to a "big ol' acrynym" website or something, because yes I agree there are way too many out there.

    4. Re:MPEG2 in the LBC by ceeam · · Score: 1

      Be grateful or The Dupe will be titled: "DVB-T STB/MPEG2 PTCA SMBS"

    5. Re:MPEG2 in the LBC by kybosh · · Score: 1

      Isn't that what MS SmartTags were intended to do?

    6. Re:MPEG2 in the LBC by theridersofrohan · · Score: 1
      PCMCIA f00l


      (People Can't Memorise Computer Industry Acronyms)

    7. Re:MPEG2 in the LBC by ajlitt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Frankly, I'm scared poopless that I parsed that title in one shot.

    8. Re:MPEG2 in the LBC by operagost · · Score: 1

      Now where's my gin and juice, homey?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    9. Re:MPEG2 in the LBC by dave1g · · Score: 1

      mod Parent up, this is a great idea.

    10. Re:MPEG2 in the LBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about content authors actually using the damn and html elements?

  6. For Now, Useless In The U.S. by aredubya74 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Every cable company is (or has been) rolling out digital cable packages to subscribers, touting the enormous number of extra channels, insta-PPV ordering, "digital quality sound" etc. The big catch is that you're shackled to their box - all the years of cable-ready TV sets go out the window. As such, since I'm not aware of any cable companies that will let you bring your own box, cool set tops are useless to us.

    --

    RW

    1. Re:For Now, Useless In The U.S. by DaHat · · Score: 1

      I'd have to do a little digging to find it, but the FCC a number of years ago ruled that home consumers can own their own equipment, that is why you are not required to rent or buy anything from the cable company and can instead bring your own.

      That's also why cable descramblers are in the grey area. Yea, they let you have more channels then you are paying for and enter the realm of signal theft (but the signal is trespassing on my property!), they are compatible with the cable network, which is the requirement to be able to own your own equipment.

      Most 'digital' cable (ie true digital cable) uses the QAM standard, and it is not too hard to buy your own QAM hardware... you're just going to end up paying for it. Hell, I've got a QAM module for a DTV receiver sitting my work desk right now and am in the process of updating it so I can take it home, QAM, 8VSB and ASI all in one box, awe yea!

    2. Re:For Now, Useless In The U.S. by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. Theres always free to air satellite TV in the US, which is a DVB satellite broadcast. Though can't see any specifics here of whether or not this box is able to receive satellite signals. (also not to mention that free to air channels are free for a reason :D )

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    3. Re:For Now, Useless In The U.S. by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      but the signal is trespassing on my property

      No it isn't.

    4. Re:For Now, Useless In The U.S. by DaHat · · Score: 1

      You realize that statement was sarcasm don't you?

    5. Re:For Now, Useless In The U.S. by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Heh - sorry, I've just seen that said in all seriousness here and elsewhere too many times :-)

    6. Re:For Now, Useless In The U.S. by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      There's tons of open-source, free, and moderately priced (three different categories) software for this out there. And they all get around the issue you describe by supporting an IR transmitter, letting it control the digital cable / sattelite receiver.

      There's even plans for building your own transmitter homebrew for about $10

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    7. Re:For Now, Useless In The U.S. by llefler · · Score: 1

      Having recently been coaxed into digital cable (it's cheaper than the standard tier because I'm in a "competition area"), I was thinking how annoying it was to need a cable box for each TV/DVR. That, and the US HDTV requirements that are going to make all of our older TVs enormous paperweights. Maybe it's time for TV manufacturers to start selling TVs without any tuner at all. If you have cable or satellite you don't need it. If you want HD broadcast, you buy a tuner that suits your needs. If the cable boxes and tuners had a DVI port, you could hook up anything to it.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
    8. Re:For Now, Useless In The U.S. by SenorCitizen · · Score: 1
      If this device is indeed DVB-T (as is probable), then no, no satellite receiver included. You'd need a box confirming to the DVB-S standard for that.

      Really. Why didn't they just make one spec to rule them all instead of DVB-T, -C, and -S??

    9. Re:For Now, Useless In The U.S. by bearwayne · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that you have the pleasure of paying rent for each box. If you're going to do that, you might as well go with satellite.

    10. Re:For Now, Useless In The U.S. by nvrrobx · · Score: 1

      They do sell TVs like that. :)

      I have a Samsung HLN567W. It has a regular VHF tuner, but no ATSC/QAM tuner. I have a Samsung SIR-TS360 plugged into it to get my HD off DirecTV or OTA. Lots of plasma screens are just monitors without tuners also.

      Anyhow, I'm guessing the regular VHF tuners are so incredibly cheap to manufacture today, they might as well keep including them. 2006 is when the HDTV mandate kicks in - in the meantime, don't buy a non-HDTV! The screens are getting as cheap as their SD counterparts were 3-4 years ago, so there's no compelling reason not to buy a digital set if you're going to replace yours.

    11. Re:For Now, Useless In The U.S. by radish · · Score: 1

      My Panasonic has no tuner, or speakers. Why pay money for stuff I'll never use?

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    12. Re:For Now, Useless In The U.S. by davidsyes · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      coaxed, coaxed, co-axed... That's an interesting word, in one context... and all 3 could happen at once:

      coaxed- teased, goaded, prodded along, persuaded

      coaxed- (forced verb of a noun, coax-, coaxial cable)

      co-axed- axed/hacked along with another (heheheh)

      Spurious word mangling at work...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    13. Re:For Now, Useless In The U.S. by CityZen · · Score: 1

      Actually, the FCC recently approved the "cablecard" modular encryption standard, allowing you to use your own cablecard-compatible TV without having to use the cable-company's box. Cable companies are required to support it.

      It's a shame something similar hasn't been done to require satellite broadcasters to support standardized receiver technology.

    14. Re:For Now, Useless In The U.S. by farnz · · Score: 1
      Because each transmission medium has different signal requirements; once you demodulate a DVB signal, the original transmission type is irrelevant, as it's all DVB.

      Satellite receivers have a limited noise budget, and the need to control an LNB; they need a mechanism that's robust in the face of low SNR, and LNB control allowed.

      Cable receivers live on a known stretch of wire; they need to be cheap, but capable of exploiting much higher SNRs than satellite ever has. Cable boxes don't need to worry about LNBs, varying SNRs, polarity, or anything other than a known SNR and known frequency.

      Terrestrial receivers need to cope with ghosts, varying SNRs, CCI and ACI, and a whole variety of problems that satellite and cable avoid. They therefore use the most complex demodulators, which cost more than satellite or cable demodulators.

    15. Re:For Now, Useless In The U.S. by llefler · · Score: 1

      have a Samsung HLN567W. It has a regular VHF tuner, but no ATSC/QAM tuner.

      It still has a tuner. It still requires the components and the labor, and you can bet that even though they are cheap, it's still figured into the cost of the TV.

      Maybe my circle of family & Friends isn't large enough, but I don't know anyone that doesn't have cable or satellite.

      Tomorrow, all of the auto manufacturers are going to start putting 'free' infant car seats into all the vehicles they manufacture. After all, they are so cheap (compared to a $25k car), they might as well go ahead and include them.

      Lots of plasma screens are just monitors without tuners also.

      Maybe so, but before I posted that I checked Circuit City's website, and out of the half a dozen I checked, all had either a simple NTSC tuner or NTSC/ATSC/QAM tuner.

      2006 is when the HDTV mandate kicks in - in the meantime, don't buy a non-HDTV!

      With a modular (preferably) external tuner, it wouldn't make any difference. If I wanted HD, I'd upgrade to an HD feed from my cable provider anyway. But I could choose whether I wanted a direct feed from a cable satellite box, an everyday NTSC tuner, or a HD tuner. With a DVI port, you'd just tell the tuner/cable box what resolution your display could support.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
  7. Thats all nice.......but by nighty5 · · Score: 1

    how much does it cost??

    1. Re:Thats all nice.......but by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      According to the article, 299 EUR.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Thats all nice.......but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      About 250,- EUR street price. Its actually quite cheap if you compare it to 140,- EUR disk-only PVRs on ebay (without disks).

    3. Re:Thats all nice.......but by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1
      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  8. RTFA euummm... Tried... by SHiVa0 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Hmmmm what if I don't read german? I have no idea what that thing is actually able to do beside having read the slashdot memo. SMB, DVB what? ... Anyone got something with more meat?

    1. Re:RTFA euummm... Tried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      English Translation


      DVB (this text to bypass lameless filter)


      SMB (this text to bypass lameless filter)

      HTH

    2. Re:RTFA euummm... Tried... by !the!bad!fish! · · Score: 1
      Anyone got something with more meat?
      Here you go then.
      --
      Kids today are tyrants. They contradict their parent, gobble their food, and tyrannize their teachers. - Socrates 400 BC
    3. Re:RTFA euummm... Tried... by Denuvo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here's a simple summary. DVB is the digital broadcasting standard used in Europe (and some other places, like Australia). DVB-T is the variant used for "T"errestrial broadcasts; DVB is also used for digital satellite (DVB-S) and cable (DVB-C). Many European countries have started doing DVB-T broadcasts, with the intention of eventually eliminating analogue transmission. There are many DVB-T set-top boxes on the market, as well as televisions with built-in DVB-T tuners. DVB-T PVRs have also started to appear. This box is sort of half-of-a-PVR. Instead of using its own internal storage, it uses an SMB share or a USB hard drive. Clever - this should reduce the price. The point of using MPEG-2 is that this is DVB's native video format. This box is not doing any encoding whatever; it's just saving a copy of the stream as it comes in from the aerial. The box only needs to be able to decode - this, too, should keep the price down.

    4. Re:RTFA euummm... Tried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Accredited Wholesaler Of Country Killed Meat"

      Is that British English for "Road Kill"?

    5. Re:RTFA euummm... Tried... by hhawk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not just "and some other places, like Australia" it's EVERYWHERE else but the US and maybe South Korea. It's the world standard.

      It's also used in the US by TV stations who are transmitting feeds back to their station "houses."

      --
      http://www.hawknest.com/
    6. Re:RTFA euummm... Tried... by Denuvo · · Score: 1
      According to the DVB Project (official stewards of the DVB standards), one country outside of Europe (Australia) has fully launched DVB-T service and trials are being performed in a handful of Asian countries. So, where is DVB-T being used? Europe and some other places (like Australia).

      ATSC is being used in the United States, Canada and South Korea. ISDB is being used in Japan.

      The rest of the world is using.. squat! Nobody else is doing terrestrial digital broadcasting. Yet.

      So... EVERYWHERE?

      A number of countries have notionally adopted DVB-T as their digital broadcasting standard, and the number of DVB-T systems will surely grow more rapidly than ATSC. (Only a couple of countries have prospectively adopted ATSC.) But DVB-T is no more "the" world standard than is GSM. Oh well.

    7. Re:RTFA euummm... Tried... by Denuvo · · Score: 1

      Oops. Just realized I've been conflating DVB and DVB-T. I should have originally said that "DVB-T is used in Europe and some other places". DVB in general has become much more widespread, particularly DVB-S which really [b]is[/b] practically a global standard.

    8. Re:RTFA euummm... Tried... by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

      Anyone got something with more meat?

      ...Must ....not ....make the obvious comment.

    9. Re:RTFA euummm... Tried... by hhawk · · Score: 1

      If not used, adopted and planned for roll out...

      Even South Korea is rumored to be leaning towards it..

      --
      http://www.hawknest.com/
    10. Re:RTFA euummm... Tried... by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Canada and Mexico will probably use ATSC. Japan has their own standard that they are developing. China may select a home-grown standard. It isn't as monolithic as you think. Many countries will stick with analog until there is a reason to switch to digital.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  9. how is this a cool design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My PC is a plain putty box.
    This device is a plain silver box.

    This is a cool design? I beg to differ...

    To be cool, it must have open clear windows showing the guts, lots 'o LED lights, preferably spinning in fans housings.

  10. English translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
  11. Half backed... by OlivierB · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They could have delivered a killer box if it supported Mpeg4.
    There's no way I am going to re-encode all my DivX to Mpeg-2. And I don't want to run VideoLan on my PC to encode on the fly and stream to this thing.

    --
    Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
    1. Re:Half backed... by Denuvo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      DVB broadcasts are MPEG-2 encoded. This device surely simply stores the received MPEG-2 stream unchanged. It's the obvious thing to do (and the same thing done by, for example, the DirecTV TiVo and Windows XP Media Center Edition).

    2. Re:Half backed... by zentigger · · Score: 1

      Perhaps transcoding your pr0n would be necessary in soviet russia, but elsewhere the box streams video to you.

      --

      the above is my personal opinion and does not necessarily reflect that of the little voices in my head

  12. Compliance by dampjam · · Score: 1

    Please, only mpeg2? What about the divx device feartured yesterday.

    1. Re:Compliance by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      They were aiming for a Dupe story, but misread the timelines slightly and ended up looking at the 1994 headlines.

      Sorry.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Compliance by julesh · · Score: 2, Informative

      MPEG2 is the format that DVB uses for transmitting its videos. I don't see the relevance of DivX here; this device is obviously intended for use as a digital video recorder and MPEG2 is the obvious format for it to use for this.

    3. Re:Compliance by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

      Maybe because the DVB standard is based on MPEG2?
      Using MPEG4 wouldn't make much of a difference for the high datarates that are used for these streams.
      MPEG4 is aimed more for bitrates lower than 2mbit. (Sort of a successor to MPEG1)

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    4. Re:Compliance by nbert · · Score: 1
      MPEG4 is aimed more for bitrates lower than 2mbit. (Sort of a successor to MPEG1)
      Since you mention it (and since this sounds like DVB would require much more bandwith):

      At least over here 4 channels share one slot, which has a bandwith of 14 MBit/s. On average you get about 3.5 MBit per channel.

      It's also possible to use less channels per slot or to give one of them more bandwith (while taking it from the others). But I guess that this won't be used too often.

    5. Re:Compliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks that (firmware upgradable) boxes will have H264 instead of Mpeg 4 in future.

      If Steve Jobs is right (didn't check specs), H264 will offer HDTV rate in mpeg2 levels of data. Also will be scalable... What comes to mind is, will digital TV finally fix the bug? I mean, if you lose satellite signal, like to 60% to your average signal, it will freeze. H264 packed with all features have half bandwidth, 1/4 to 1/24 on same file.

      Just like analogue system, maybe it will be more reliable than?

  13. Nothing new here by edwardd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Dreambox is a set top box that has supported DVB for years, and it supports DVB-T (Broadcast), DVB-S (Satalite) as well as DVB-C (Cable).

    http://www.dream-multimedia-tv.de/Bereiche/Produkt e/DM7000_featurelist.php/

    VDR has aslo been available for years to support the same standards under Linux. It is a full featured PVR with a robust plugin interface.

    http://cadsoft.de/vdr/

    North American viewers on the East Coast can take advantage of DVB-S & pick up a number of satalites that cover the Atlantic region. There is a wide variety of FTA programming available. My dad used to be a ham operator, I guess this is the new `ham` hobby.

    1. Re:Nothing new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is also quite cool, however last time I checked the dreambox did not have DVB-T. Do you have any experience with DVB-T and the dreambox ?

    2. Re:Nothing new here by cardpuncher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Despite having a 2.6 kernel (which in theory includes the DVB drivers) and a weekend to spare, I still failed to get anywhere close to getting vdr running. It does *not* support receving and replaying DVB-T with any readily-available DVB-T card. It will fully support DVB-T with such cards *only* if a DVB-S card with MPEG decoder is also present *or* at the cost of some considerable further complication and reduced functionality if you also have an old DXR-3 card or a Hauppauge MediaMVP.

      I suspect the Siemens box will have a lower total cost than the vdr solution and will have the considerable advantage of being installed by simply plugging in the power.

  14. Re:Xbox. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No it can't you dumbass. This box has DVB-T hardware for digital TV and also PVR features for time-shiftinf etc. Try doing that with your XBOX.

  15. Awesome! by shplorb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This looks cool. Hopefully it can view aussie DTV... I understand that our standard is a weird blend of DVB-T and ATSC in that we use DVB for everything but the audio, which is in AC-3.

    Whilst that made STB's initially expensive, I think it'll be a good decision as we move to the future - it's nice to be able to receive a HD signal on my PC with my DVB-T tuner card and pipe the AC-3 out the fibre to my receiver.

    So yeah, umm... this is cool and perhaps if this or something even better comes out down here that'll be another nail in the coffin of my currently-stalled DVR project.

    1. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a blend but you have one of the few DVB-HD networks in the world, it's still DVB but just with High Definition pictures instead of SD in many cases.

    2. Re:Awesome! by prometheus.au · · Score: 1

      The other major difference over the EU and UK spec DVB-T specifications is the bandwidth of digital channels broadcasted on VHF (maybe UHF too)in Australia. Australia's channel bandwidth is 7MHz whilst the UK and EU (I believe, correct me if I am wrong) is 8 MHz. Which means they can fit more content per channel.

      --
      signature placeholder for rent.
  16. BUT.,. by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

    I betcha cant put linux on it!

  17. Re:Xbox. by matthew.thompson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oooh where did you get the X-Box with a DVB-T dual tuner then?

    --
    Matt Thompson - Actuality - Insert product here.
  18. D-Link DSM-320 by Pedrito · · Score: 3, Informative

    I recently bought the D-Link DSM-320, which isn't a tuner, but allows you to play movies and music as well as view images from your computer, onto your TV via ethernet or 802.11b/g.

    It doesn't use SMB shares, however. You run a server app on your Windows machine and tell it the directories you want to share.

    I have to say I'm a bit disappointed with it so far. The biggest problem is that using the wireless, a lot of movies don't have sound. From what I have read, this is a bandwidth issue and should go away if I go with wired ethernet, but I haven't tried that yet.

    It also has a number of small usability issues. It doesn't respond to the remote control very well and you need pretty direct aim and also need to sometimes press a button multiple times. It sometimes hangs and responds late to button presses, so you end up hitting a button over and over again thinking it's not getting it, only to get all the button hits several seconds later.

    On the other hand, the system allows for automatic firmware upgrades (which it did the first time I connected) and it appears to have improved significantly from earlier versions, so I'm hoping it will continue to improve. I considered taking it back, but I'm going to hold onto it and just hope that the firmware upgrades will eventually remedy most of these problems.

    It's nice to see more of these types of devices coming out. My real goal is to build a MythTV box because I think that's going to be more of what I'm looking for. I have a DirectTV receiver with TiVo and the TiVo is great with the exception that I can't store the movies offline and I can't access my substantial collection of TV shows from my computer with it. So I think at this point MythTV is the only way to go.

    1. Re:D-Link DSM-320 by hhawk · · Score: 1

      I also have a DSM-320 and I offer this more detailed review...

      In terms of Wi-Fi it supports B and G.

      It supports a variety of video formats, AVI, DIVX, MPEG 1-4. With the latest upgrades it can do video forward and backwards (in FF or Fast reverse). Downloaded video file look good when played via the DSM-320 on my 20 inch TV set.

      It plays MP3 and you can create play lists on your PC. I think this is a great feature as many have some type of high end "home theater system" and this let's you turn that into an MP3 player. There some MP3 Only competitors to the DSM-320, if that is all you need.

      It also supports viewing photos (jpg) on the TV screen which makes for a nice post vacation slide show.

      It also works with some online content from AOL, NAPSTER and others if you want paid digital music.

      --
      http://www.hawknest.com/
    2. Re:D-Link DSM-320 by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      It doesn't use SMB, It's probably a uPnP AV Device (Specs). Intel have a reference implementation of a server and client (can't find the link ATM).
      The server will be listening on a port (it may or may not be a standard port, wither way I'm not sure what that port is) that you can point a web browser to, it should then return an xml file with other details about the content being served.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  19. Re:Xbox. by Jaruzel · · Score: 1

    That, is just a matter of time. A decent modded Xbox ($99+$25) with the free non-MS Media Center, can stream all the popular media formats. There are also 3rd party drivers (and linux drivers) that support the in built USB ports, so I'm sure if someone hunted hard enough, a USB DVB capture dongle could be used.

    Personally, I don't Record off-air, as it's all shite.

    --
    Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
  20. Re:Good, but... by 1qa2ws3ed · · Score: 1

    i'm going to see how you can put a 15mbit 1080i mpeg2+ac3 dvb stream on a 12mbit usb connection.

  21. OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've slashdotted the biggest electronics company in the Fourth Reich!

  22. Re:Good, but... by Jaruzel · · Score: 0

    You have a point there ;) I'll shut up.

    --
    Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
  23. GPL violation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously they're using the Samba client, so where's the source?

    1. Re:GPL violation? by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

      Show them the written offer they supplied with the binaries. (You did buy the product or have the binaries do you?)

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    2. Re:GPL violation? by julesh · · Score: 1

      Why obviously? Samba is _not_ the only implemention of SMB, a protocol for which the specs are publically available.

  24. why usb and not firewire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Three or four years ago, in 2000-2001, firewire was the only choice for external hard disks, USB 1.1 was too slow.

    Even now firewire 1 is faster than high speed USB and firewire 1.5 is way much better. Right now high speed usb and firewire 1 adapters have about the same prices and most external boxes are combos. Why use USB and not firewire?

    1. Re:why usb and not firewire? by julesh · · Score: 1

      Because USB is good enough for their application, and is compatible with a wider range of existing hardware, I suspect.

    2. Re:why usb and not firewire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Netgem DvB box has a USB port. Allows neat stuff like plugging in digital cameras and card readers to view photos, USB memory sticks for file storage for the email and CLI functions (a picture of the caller pops up onscreen) and so on. I run a network adaptor for video streaming, others use USB drives on it.

      Its also a lot cheaper and easier to add a external USB hub than multiple firewire ports.

    3. Re:why usb and not firewire? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Its also a lot cheaper and easier to add a external USB hub than multiple firewire ports.

      There are Firewire hubs, you know.

    4. Re:why usb and not firewire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I understand it, if your product uses firewire, you have to pay a fee to apple for its use. The licensing issue could play a role, and would be my first guess. Follow the money trail. :)

    5. Re:why usb and not firewire? by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1
      There are Firewire hubs, you know.

      You can daisychain FireWire, you know.

    6. Re:why usb and not firewire? by tepples · · Score: 1

      True, but if you daisychain FireWire, you break the chain whenever you unplug a device.

  25. DVB-T by hhawk · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's worth noting that DVB-T, T for Terrestrial, is the standard for over the air digital broadcasts everywhere in the world except the US, and possibly South Korea.

    DVB-C, the standard for digital cable, and DVB-S is the standard for Satellite TV.

    The US claims that DVB-T doesn't work well in more rural areas, which maybe true.

    --
    http://www.hawknest.com/
    1. Re:DVB-T by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "The US claims that DVB-T doesn't work well in more rural areas, which maybe true."

      It has to do with the modulation. DVB uses CODFM, which is excellent at avoiding multipath issues but requires at least twice as much power to go the same distance as an 8VSB system (like the US ATSC standard) under clear conditions.

      Translation: If you live in an area where multipath is the primary concern, CODFM is better. Otherwise, 8VSB is better.

      Sinclair, the developers of CODFM, attempted to get the FCC to switch to CODFM. Extensive studies were conducted and it was determined that, at current power levels and transmitter locations, less US households would recieve a viewable signal with CODFM than with 8VSB.

      8VSB has gotten a lot better, too - 4th generation recievers can approach CODFM for their multipath-handling ability. CODFM has improved as well, but the difference is less dramatic.

  26. English description & more pictures by 3se · · Score: 1
    Got this via email:

    Gigaset M740 AV: The entertainment box from Cordless Products

    The new Gigaset M740 AV Digital Video Broadcasting Receiver marks Cordless Products’ entry into the entertainment market – and has already won its first customer: Carrefour Spain has ordered 50,000 of them.

    The versatile Gigaset M740 AV brings the future of home entertainment to the living room. It’s a set-top box for receiving digital aerial television programs, a television projector and an MP3 player for the home HiFi system all in one. The set-top box allows users to decide what they want to see and when they want to see it. Because in combination with a hard disk drive, the Gigaset M740 AV affords time-shift television. This intelligent form of TV program recording is a highly practical option if the viewer happens to be called away during an on-air program, for example, but would later like to see what was missed. While the on-air program is still being recorded, the viewer can look at earlier portions of the program that were missed (time-shift function). Moreover, the Gigaset M740 AV is equipped with two tuners to enable one program to be recorded while another is being viewed live. This finally puts an end to one annoying problem with most commercial set-top boxes. In contrast to the Gigaset M740 AV, they’re unable to record one decoder-received program while watching another live on the screen.

    The hard disk that’s used to record the program can be attached directly to the set-top box, or the device can interface with a hard disk in a PC via either a cable or cordless link and be integrated into a Wireless LAN. The device can also be used for listening to MP3 music files over a HiFi system and for viewing digital photos and films on a television set. The Gigaset M740 AV will be launched on the German market in October, in time for Christmas business.

    Beginning in October, this smart box will additionally be on the shelves of the Carrefour retail chain in Spain. With a contract for over 50,000 devices, Carrefour intends to play a pioneering role in the introduction of digital terrestrial television: In Spain, 90 percent of the population views terrestrial-based television. Carrefour wants to use the device to gain a direct presence on its customers’ TV screens to offer value-added services like product and marketing information or for downloading mobile phone ringer tunes.

    Cordless Products is using this universal set-top box as the kickoff for a bevy of innovations relating to digitized multimedia content, such as voice, photos, films and music: “We’re working on an extensive product portfolio that we’ll be gradually debuting over the course of the coming months,” says CP chief Clemens J. Joos.

    Connection to an antenna for terrestrial reception.

    More Pictures:

    http://www.siemens.com/index.jsp?sdc_rh=null&sdc_f lags=null&sdc_sectionid=0&sdc_secnavid=0&sdc_3dnvl stid=&sdc_countryid=0&sdc_mpid=0&sdc_unitid=999&sd c_conttype=2&sdc_contentid=1213888&sdc_langid= 0

    http://www.siemens.com/index.jsp?sdc_rh=null&sdc_f lags=null&sdc_sectionid=0&sdc_secnavid=0&sdc_3dnvl stid=&sdc_countryid=0&sdc_mpid=0&sdc_unitid=999&sd c_conttype=2&sdc_contentid=12138

  27. Hauppage Media MVP by Cwaig · · Score: 1
    This sounds like another variant using the IBM STBx25xx chip, as used in the Hauppage Media MVP.

    It's probably derived from the same IBM sourced reference design as the MVP (bolting on a DVB tuner is a doddle). If it's anything like the MVP, it'll even be running linux as well....

    --
    +++ BASELINE REALITY FAILURE+++ +++ PLEASE REBOOT UNIVERSE +++
  28. Re:VOTE FOR BUSCH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ah, the Beer Party ticket. Good choice.

  29. Good decision for the future? by SenorCitizen · · Score: 1
    This looks cool. Hopefully it can view aussie DTV... I understand that our standard is a weird blend of DVB-T and ATSC in that we use DVB for everything but the audio, which is in AC-3. Whilst that made STB's initially expensive, I think it'll be a good decision as we move to the future - it's nice to be able to receive a HD signal on my PC with my DVB-T tuner card and pipe the AC-3 out the fibre to my receiver.
    And AC-3 is soo much better than MPEG2 multichannel -- why? Many receivers in Europe support MPEG2 just as well, since it was part of the DVD format recommendation for Region 2.
    1. Re:Good decision for the future? by shplorb · · Score: 1

      I don't know why/if AC-3 audio is better than MPEG audio. I just remember their being a big stink about our DTV standard being "unique" and it causing high prices because of the small size of the aussie market when it was all introduced back in 2000 or so. On further investigation I found that the uniqueness is that we use AC-3 audio. There could be other different things, but that's as much info as I could find at the time. I just presume it's better because pretty much every DVD has an AC-3 soundtrack and every receiver can accept and and decode it. I'm not a digital audio geek so I don't know exactly all the specifics of what exactly AC-3 is and how it's different to DTS and MPEG audio. Hell, they could all be the same thing for all I know!

    2. Re:Good decision for the future? by farnz · · Score: 2, Informative
      Australia has DVB-T, with MP@HL video (high definition), and AC-3 audio (Dolby Digital). Europe, which is the other big DVB-T market, uses MP@ML (standard definition), and MPEG-2 audio.

      If Australian DVB-T boxes support MPEG-2 audio as well as AC-3 audio, then they'll work unchanged in Europe; European boxes require simpler video streams than Australia offers, but if they have an AC-3 decoder, they'll handle the audio out there.

  30. Re:Good morning star shine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ROTFL! So Mike Bouma finally made it in the movie business!

  31. SMB shares? WTF? by ChipMonk · · Score: 1

    First floppies, then the Internet, then email within the 'net. Now your video player. Why would you want to turn your video device into yet another... erm... channel for spreading Windows viri?

  32. USB? Try 100BASE-TX by tepples · · Score: 1

    i'm going to see how you can put a 15mbit 1080i mpeg2+ac3 dvb stream on a 12mbit usb connection.

    Screw USB. I'm going to see how they can put such a stream on 100mbit ethernet connection.

    1. Re:USB? Try 100BASE-TX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean 100Mbit? I don't think millibits are possible on a digital computer..

    2. Re:USB? Try 100BASE-TX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You knew what he meant.

  33. Wow! by Not_Wiggins · · Score: 1

    With that many acronyms in the summary, this MUST be really cool technology I should rush out and buy!!!

    So, uh... what does it do? ;)

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying, "Nice doggie!" until you can find a rock.
  34. by law, you don't have to use their box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By law, digital cable companies are required to support CableCARD. It started a few months ago. This means if you have a CableCARD ready TV or decoder box, you can use it with a rented card to receive the shows you want.

    All HDTVs are now required to come with digital tuners in them. Within the last month, a friend got one of these, hooked his cable to it, and is receiving digital cable channels without a cable box. It seemed like a miracle to me, which sucks since back in the 70s, anyone could do this (when cable was analog).

    But anyway, it is here. Try to keep up.

  35. Unfortunately by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    While the modulation for DVB-S is standardized, the encryption setups for DVB-S are not quite so standard. There ARE standard interfaces between most DVB-S receivers and encryption devices, but the encryption scheme used by Echostar (Dish) is not implemented in any of the dongles supported by PCI DVB-S tuners such as those made by Hauppauge for the European market.

    DVB-C and DVB-T (Cable and Terrestrial DVB, they do use different modulation schemes, etc.) are not used in the U.S. at all.

    OTA Broadcast streams use ATSC, which does have decent hardware support (including *linux-only* tuner boards), but cable streams use a proprietary transmission format that uses QAM modulation and is almost always encrypted, even for "local" channels that are available unencrypted in the same area if you've got an antenna. Very few PCI tuners support QAM modulation schemes, and NONE will decrypt encrypted cable streams.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Unfortunately by CityZen · · Score: 1

      Actually, Dish sort-of uses a standard encryption scheme, Nagravision (and now Nagra2).

      However, they will not allow anyone to subscribe with anything other than their receivers, so it really doesn't matter if you have the standardized equipment; you have to use their proprietary boxes.

      (What this allows Dish to do is to continually change the boxes' firmware for "increased" security and bugginess.)

      In Europe, broadcasters are required to work with standardized hardware. In the US, we promote monopolies.

      Fortunately, the FCC appears to be requiring the cable industry to support the "cablecard" modular encryption scheme, allowing you to use your own cardcard-compatible TV set without a proprietary cable box. Wish they'd do something similar for satellite broadcasters.

    2. Re:Unfortunately by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Nagra was too much cracked so especially digital package companies (like Digiturk etc) turned to Philips Cryptoworks even ordering their own box. Smartcard+Modem combination makes it evil to crack. :)

  36. Re:Unfortunately-Stream this:Sleepless in Seattle? by davidsyes · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=57 2&ncid=572&e=1&u=/nm/20041018/lf_nm/life_parakeets _dc

    This would NoT be the "mlife" that ms would like to live down... if all these birds began "cussin' up a storm", making late wakers "sleepless in Seattle", HOOO!!!!

    Maybe those streams can carry this to the dishes and STBs and on to the TV sets, except, maybe the birds will give uncle bill the bird... "Blank you, bill gates, Bendover, bill gates..."

    I guess a schload of megaphones can teach the birds in short order...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  37. Anybody know how do this? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    I've got $20 for somebody who can get me a parts list that'll do this for under $200. There ought not be any expensive encoders needed - it's MPEG-2 already.

    All I want to do is to be able to use MythTV with the digital signal I've paid for, with my authorized smart card - no shenanigans here. Some kind of USB or PCI hardware that I can slide my smartcard into would be fine.

    I already have the Dish DVR and it's very light on the features and pretty heavy on the bugs.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  38. D-Link MediaLounge by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Maybe the D-Link MediaLounge is more what you're looking for.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  39. Chaining firewire devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firewire devices can be chained without a hub and thus no multiple ports on the adapter are necessary. This is not possible for USB devices, if you are out of sockets you need a hub. For old boxes, manufactured in 2000-2001, it is better to use a firewire hub, otherwise variable currents may damage the box or the adapter. This is not a problem for the new boxes, manufactured in 2003-2004.

  40. I thought Intel charges a fee for USB too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does Intel olffer USB for free?

  41. Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those who are wondering about the price: 299 EUR (~374 $)

    But I suppose you'll get in much cheaper on ebay (like most of the Siemens products)

    1. Re:Price by Hank+Chinaski · · Score: 1

      it's less than 250 dollars on german amazon.de

      --
      IAAL
  42. Funny by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    DVB you say? Shame that's not going to be compatible with the ATSC standard here in the states.

    DVB = Digital Video Broadcast
    ATSC = Advanced Television Systems Committee

    I was sure that was a typo and we were talking about DVD and NTSC. Seriously. I guess I must read too much of mispelled texts and my brain is trying to correct all the typos subconciously without my consent and knowledge. Thanks for the hint.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  43. Badnarik is a dumb fuck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you some kind of moron advocating that dumb crap in your sig?

  44. My BLT drive caused a BSOD by Darth23 · · Score: 1

    and now I'm SOL

    --

    -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

  45. AC-3 only for HD by ghostgum · · Score: 1

    Austalia uses standard MPEG Layer 2 stereo audio for Standard Definition (same as Europe), but uses AC-3 for HD so that surround audio can be sent to a Dolby Digital capable receiver. Most receivers on the market here don't have Layer 2 decode, so the DVD player or DTV set top box just sends it as stereo PCM.

    Many stations actually transmit both layer 2 and AC-3 stereo audio for SDTV. Occasionally there will be 5.1 AC-3 audio on the SD broadcast for special events (e.g. ABC rock music concert).

    DVB-T for SDTV in Australia uses a different channel spacing (7 not 8MHz) uses VHF as well as UHF bands.

  46. DVB-T by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1

    +5 Insightful my ass. The box is not meant for cable. The T in DVB-T stands for "terrestrial". So this is meant for the new TV standard that's replacing the traditional air wave TV.

  47. Re: your sig by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
    Your sig:
    -- regards, jon
    (penname Lee Garbutt)

    Want to contact me?
    AIM: PCMANJON
    pcmanjon@swbell.net
    Dear Mr. pcmanjon:
    Your sig contains too many lines.
    Please eliminate three.
    I am not a crackpot.
    -- Abraham Simpson
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana