Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Source Engine SDK Released

Posted by Zonk on from the make-your-own-black-mesa dept.

wolrahnaes writes "It's finally available to the public. According to a post on The Valve ERC Collective, the tools needed to create maps and mods for Half-Life 2, Counter-Strike: Source, and other Source engine based titles are now available on Steam. Some documentation is available here."

54 comments

  1. Natural Selection... by dhakbar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Oh my!

    I sure hope to see creative mods such as Natural Selection ported from HL to HL2. That would be a dream come true.

    1. Re:Natural Selection... by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 0

      Wasn't natural selection licensed for a Single Player game under the HL2 engine code?

      --
      Business Voyeur
    2. Re:Natural Selection... by Techen · · Score: 1

      That would certainly be cool. It certainly make things different. Imagine a skulk that pushes a barrel in front of him to block gun fire or an Onos that smashes threw a unfortified wall.

      Unfortunatly with all the work being done to Natural Selection on the old Half-Life engine it may be some time before a port is even considered.

    3. Re:Natural Selection... by Flayra · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hey guys,

      I'm glad there's interest here. :) The 'SDK' that was released doesn't have any actual code or coding information. It seems to be the new model viewer and updated version of Hammer (the map editor). So we still can't experiment with it, to see how much work it would be to move the code-base over.

      If and when we do move NS over, we'll likely keep the gameplay exactly the same (at least for now) and then stop supporting the original NS. Trying to balance and support two versions would be a lot of unnecessary work.

      Also, I've started design (and funding) work on a next-gen game in the Natural Selection universe, but there are no details available there yet (unless you want to help fund it).

      Cheers,

      -Charlie

      --
      Game Director
      Unknown Worlds Entertainment
      http://www.unknownworlds.com
      http://www.charliecleveland.com
    4. Re:Natural Selection... by Nos. · · Score: 1

      Cool, a post by Flayra!
      As a huge fan of NS (constellation member, and OldF member) I'm glad to see future work on Natural Selection is being scoped. While I'd love to see NS ported to Source, wherever NS goes, lots will follow.
      We've been seeing a lot of new players recently. Just last night there were three or four newbies playing which was great to see, though made for some different style games since the servers are usually packed with regulars.
      NS is truly one of the more innovative games I've seen in a long time. Of course, like others, I'd love to see a larger tech tree and the ability to play MvM or AvA, or even three or four team games, but regardless, I'll keep playing.
      Keep of the good work!

    5. Re:Natural Selection... by F34nor · · Score: 1

      I'd just like to say that I honestly think NS is the most enjoyable, interesting and challenging multiplayer game I have ever seen. Well... discounting Starcontrol 2 of course.

      I would love to see a Source NS. Is Valve offering any help to large 3rd party Mods for HL? It seems like the CS Source was a major push, is there any weight left for you guys?

      Oh yeah, when I get swallowed by an Onos and I happen to have my knife out, I'd like to be able to stab that beast as I die.

      Thanks.

  2. ...AND VALVE BREATH A SIGH OF RELIEF by hine_uk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    because all those people who can make good games are going to save their asses again. Dont get me wrong, Half life kicked ass and I am sure that half life 2 will kick ass too but the only reason half life is so fondly remembered is due to the number of world class mods that came out. Valve made a good game, amateur coders made their engine a phenomenon.

    1. Re:...AND VALVE BREATH A SIGH OF RELIEF by Cassius105 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I disagree

      the original Half Life was amazing and would of been remembered as a classic without mods

      what mods have done is made it stay popular to this day rather than just being remembered

    2. Re:...AND VALVE BREATH A SIGH OF RELIEF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Half Life was so amazing that I only played through a couple levels and then stuck it back in the closet. SO AMAZING.

    3. Re:...AND VALVE BREATH A SIGH OF RELIEF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Half-Life? Levels?

      Are you sure it was half-life?

    4. Re:...AND VALVE BREATH A SIGH OF RELIEF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      would of been remembered

      "would have".

  3. Learning Curve by Phatboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For people that will use this:
    How does the increasing complexity of producing artwork/maps for a game affect the amateur scene?
    Do you think the steeper learning curve makes the mods that finally come out better, or does it just make the whole process more demanding and less fun?

    1. Re:Learning Curve by Propagandhi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Tough question..

      In Doom 3's case the new lighting methods along with the shear level of level geometry expected of a mapper/modder has certainly slowed the rate of release for new levels and mods. It also takes quite a beast of a machine to run Doom3ed stabily and that eliminates a lot of the community from contributing.

      From what we've seen HL 2 isn't quite so extreme. The basic geometry of cbble (its source is included with Hammer, so it serves as a good example) is a lot simpler than Doom 3's multiplayer maps (which were simpler than many of Doom 3's single player maps). The lighting is also more traditional in HL 2 (it's not all real time) so mappers don't have anything new to get used to there.

      The prop system is much more powerful than the old pre-fab way of doing things, and not having to make any kind of serious detail with Hammer will speed things up, IMO. Instead of carefully modeling your APC out of brushes, you just import an APC model that (hopefully) someone else has already made. There's a lot of prop's included already, too, and when HL 2 is actually released it's assumed that all the models used in game will be released to the community. That's a lot of content (not just models, textures too) to sort through, though, and can definately impeed someone trying to find what they need.

      The texture browser included with Hammer is pretty decent, though. It allows users to search for textures by keyword and Valve did a good job of appropriately naming each one.

      Ultimately, noone can deny that creating more geometry takes more time, but the workflow of the mod tools themselves is increasing, as is the experience level of the user base. It takes more time to create a modern, good looking map, but not THAT much more...

      I kind of rambled there, hopfully it all makes sense.

  4. Forget Mods by superpulpsicle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The reason why original HalfLife was such a success is because it ran fluidly on every video card. HalfLife 2 with or without mods have quite a steep requirement to climb. If it's anything like Doom III, I'll wait for double-digit patches.

    1. Re:Forget Mods by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      Like any quake based engine, HL2 will scale down pretty well if you know your way around the console.

      Its still far more of a memory whore than its worth, though. By that I mean the ratio of resources required to the ratio of fun just makes it not worth the $50-$80 + cost of hardware if you dont want to run the game in a mode so ugly most will consider you cheating.

      Personally, I say long live QuakeWorld
      Anything faster than a P1 can run it (and I'm not just talking x86), and its been upgraded far beyond HL1 as far as graphics-- MD3 models, Particle explosions (instead of seeing the same 3 sprites in a row on every explosion), RELIABLE NETCODE (counterstrike players know what I'm talking about), and most importantly, It's fun.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    2. Re:Forget Mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like any quake based engine, HL2 will scale down pretty well...

      HL 2 is not quake based. It does scale down well though...

    3. Re:Forget Mods by Edgewize · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um ... HL2 is not quake-based. It's based on "Source", a homebrew engine that has separate rendering paths for DX7, DX8.0, DX8.1, and DX9.

      That means that the game is enjoyable on anything as low as a Radeon 7500 or Geforce2 MX. Low-end systems still get all the main content, while skipping the eye candy (like refractive water) that they can't draw.

      And FYI, the new netcode in the Source engine (as seen in CS: Source) feels much more robust than what we previously had with CS 1.6.

    4. Re:Forget Mods by Magnakai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I disagree. When Half Life was released, it ran poorly on my fairly recent machine. Remember, this was back before everyone had solid graphics cards and surplus memory. I'm sure that if you're playing HL2 on a contemporaray machine in 2009, it'll run like a dream.

    5. Re:Forget Mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      The reason why original HalfLife was such a success is because it ran fluidly on every video card. HalfLife 2 with or without mods have quite a steep requirement to climb. If it's anything like Doom III, I'll wait for double-digit patches.

      Half-life was released in November of 1998, and it did not run well on the typical gamer system then. I had a P2 400 and 128MB RAM with a TNT2 graphics card and got about 25 FPS in 640x480 after much tweaking. There were also many serious problems with the engine. For instance, in the original netcode, your ping and framerate were directly tied to each other. Also, WON was so broken it was turned off "quietly" for a while.

      Once mods like Counter-Strike came around, you really needed a GF3 class graphics card to get a proper FPS experience. This was due to the DX8 code it used and higher polygon counts for the models.

      When I say "proper FPS experience", I mean the right framerate for a first person shooter. I play my best if I'm getting 60-70+ frames/sec. Sure, your eyes can't put that rate together any different, but it is a whole world of difference when "the world" is in 70 fps as opposed to 20-30 fps.

    6. Re:Forget Mods by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, it is.

      Quake1 -> Hl1 -> Hl2.

      You still see plenty of error references refering to the .qc game(mod) source, which is QuakeC.

      HL2 is just a sequential engine update, they didnt rewrite it from the ground up, so it still has its origin in quake.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    7. Re:Forget Mods by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 5, Informative

      " Um ... HL2 is not quake-based. It's based on "Source", a homebrew engine that has separate rendering paths for DX7, DX8.0, DX8.1, and DX9."

      Source is just the working name for the engine. Its not written from scratch, its based on HL1. If it wernt for the legalitys, you could easil run jwz's code comparison on the hl2 source leak and the quake1 source dir and find a ton of similarities.

      I've played with the engine for a while now, and even with a DX9 card (fx5600), you're still better off using the dx7 renderer just for the fps boost, but the visual difference is huge.

      As for the netcode, CS1.6 was(and is) horrible. Even on a large lan the netcode screwups were apparnt, I saw plenty of people teleporting and shots not registering at CPL Summer 04.

      Then CS:S came out, and its even worse because noone has the cpu required to update with the server at a timely frequency. Its like playing against people on dialup, even when theyre only 20ms away from the server.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    8. Re:Forget Mods by space_jake · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I dont know half-life 1 ran pretty well on a 166 Mhz AMD K6, with 64 mb ram and a voodoo2 upon release.

    9. Re:Forget Mods by Taulin · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actaully, it was stated that Source is built from scratch.

    10. Re:Forget Mods by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Which, according to those who saw the sourcecode, is a blatant lie.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    11. Re:Forget Mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember reading this article http://www.gamatomic.net/ga/news.aspx?nws_id=4384& nws_sn=1&nws_sd=1 some year ago, which compared some of the Quake2 to HalfLife2 source files. This was short after the HL2 source code leak.
      Too bad the screenshots doesn't work any more. You saw Q2 code on the one side compared to HL2 on the other.

      HL2 is basically just an enhacement of Q1/Q2 engine, which means Valve still need to pay license fees to id software if they want to use the code in non GPL/closed source games.

    12. Re:Forget Mods by Taulin · · Score: 1
      Those who develop engines know that reuse is common in large systems, especially when material that manipulates values. Crap, even I am still using some of my matrix and object management functions from the software rendering days. They are highly optimized and there is no reason to throw them away. Networking is pretty much the same no matter how you look at it. All that is different from game to game is optimization of what is sent over the wire which is dependent on the game. While the core networking might be the same, the classes that manage the data will be different.

      Saying an engine is built apon an old one simply by re-use of code is ignorant.

    13. Re:Forget Mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example: blah blah blah

    14. Re:Forget Mods by Cap'n+Steve · · Score: 1

      If (hypothetically) one were to (accidentally) look through the stolen source code, they might notice many comments mentioning Quake.

    15. Re:Forget Mods by Bollie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Half-life was released in November of 1998, and it did not run well on the typical gamer system then. I had a P2 400 and 128MB RAM with a TNT2 graphics card and got about 25 FPS in 640x480 after much tweaking.

      I'm sorry, I had a P2 266 with a Permedia 2 chipset graphics card (Creative Labs Graphics Blaster Exxtreme if I recall correctly). 640x480 netted me 25 fps and when I upgraded to a TNT (NOT TNT2) I had 1024x768 at a very decent framerate (probably more than 30, it never jerked). BTW, both were at full detail.

      Maybe you were thinking of a P2 200 and a Riva128?
    16. Re:Forget Mods by Ben+Brighton · · Score: 1

      I had a p2 400 with 320 megs of ram and a Voodoo2 paired with a Riva 128 (I think).

      After an insane amount of tweaking, I ended up getting an average of 50-60 fps at 800x600 without any serious loss of visual quality in CS1.3. Thats better fps average than I got when I upgraded to a p4 1.8 with a gf3ti500 (in the beginning, fixed it eventually).

      --
      Just back up one song from the album, and a text file that says "more shit like this". Think of the space you save -Mant
    17. Re:Forget Mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > I've played with the engine for a while now, and even with a DX9 card (fx5600), you're still better off using the dx7 renderer just for the fps boost, but the visual difference is huge.

      You are telling me that something that requires more time to process to make it look significantly better, is slower than the uglier, slower-computer-friendly version? How long did it take to do the PhD work behind this? There was NOTHING informative about this post, not even the experience at the CPL on the LAN (or in his basement with some friends, whatever he calls CPL is up to him). Not to mention that the code similarities would likely be there. Even if the engine is "all new," they will still reuse some code. Not everyone likes to reinvent the wheel everyday.

      - If I were not at work, I would be logged in, but hell if I remember my password for this site (I just reset it on Slashdot as necessary).

    18. Re:Forget Mods by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      "You are telling me that something that requires more time to process to make it look significantly better, is slower than the uglier, slower-computer-friendly version? How long did it take to do the PhD work behind this?"

      No, asshat, I'm saying the DX9 renderer is slow even on a decent card, and that you're better off forcing the game to use a renderer it doesnt want to.

      "whatever he calls CPL is up to him"
      No, asshat, The CPL is the biggest CS lan in the world. 4500 was the number of people in the byoc last year. want my byoc pub demos?

      "Not to mention that the code similarities would likely be there. Even if the engine is "all new," they will still reuse some code. Not everyone likes to reinvent the wheel everyday."

      No shit, asshat, thats what I said. The parent poster was saying HL2 wasn't based on quake, and I was saying otherwise. And incase anyone feels like arguing with me..

      Core.dll from CS:Source ->
      1002B2F4 pushmsec....tfstate.weaponanim..fov.physinfo....m_ flNextAttack..
      1002B334 ammo_rockets....ammo_cells..ammo_shells.ammo_nails ..maxspeed....
      1002B374 waterjumptime...flSwimTime..flDuckTime..flTimeStep Sound.weapons.

      Funny, Niether CS nor HL even uses cells or nails, yet those are the exact 4 names of the ammo variables that are used in quake (and still exist in HL1CS.. do a delta_stats in console and you'll see all the variables attached to the player struct)

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    19. Re:Forget Mods by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      Are you kidding? You obviously didn't play Half Life at launch. It had a steep requirement at the time. I spent about $1600 to get a computer and it could barely run it. I also have to chuckle at your "fluidly" comment. Getting the video to work was frustating as all hell since you had to wait for a driver/patch release from both the game and the card manufacture before the game would even run in the various graphics modes. There where no plug in play drivers at the time so if you didn't have an IT/computer enthusist buddy you weren't going to be playing it in much beyond software mode and you were certainly not going to be playing on a LAN or online.

      It's just at the time the game was written it would run on a PII 233 32mb ram and a 1-4mb video card in 1998. It's little wonder that the game came into it's own when you could get it to absolutely scream with a $25 video card 64mb of ram and a 500mhz processor that and of course Team Fortress and Counter Strike mods.

      Half Life was obviously well into the double-digit patches by the time you began to play it if all you remember is happy happy thoughts.

    20. Re:Forget Mods by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      When did you start playing HL? Obviously it wasn't at launch in 1998.

      The game was an absolute pain in the ass. It took a beast of a computer to run it. My $1600 computer at the time couldn't run it very well. P2 233 32mb ram, no 3d card, you get the idea. After upgrading to 64mb of ram a 333mhz and a vodoo 1 card did I finally enjoy the HL gaming experience.

      No plug and play drivers existed and you had to wait for a patch from both the video card manufacture and valve before it would support the various video modes. DirectX what the hell was that?!

      Forget about it if you didn't have an IT/computer guru buddy if you wanted to play it online/LAN

      It's amazing how popular a game can become when just a few short years later that it can absolutely scream on the most minimal of inexpensive hardware along with some good content (MODS TEAM FORTRESS and later Counter Strike) and newbee friendly driver support.

      Let's not forget the game was well into the double-digit patches by then and was about as bug free as a game could get.

    21. Re:Forget Mods by Charcharodon · · Score: 1

      oops double posted

    22. Re:Forget Mods by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      D3D and OpenGL video modes reduced your framerate to sub-30. I had p233's at work in 1998 (and I remember the day Halflife came out) with VooDoo 1 cards. The machines with 128M RAM performed at 45 fps in software mode.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
  5. Semi-Available to the public by Propagandhi · · Score: 5, Informative

    You need to have pre-order HL 2 on Steam to have access to the SDK, right now.

    Also, it isn't the "full" SDK. You cannot compile new binaries (IE, new mods) but you can start creating maps (Hammer is included, along with a model viewer) and I'm fairly certain you can compile models (made with XSI, a light version of which can be downloaded for free here).

    If you've worked with Hammer or Worldcraft before (or any brush based editor before) you should be in familiar territory. The Snark Pit and The VERC boards can provide some resources for newbies (as well as other sites, I'm sure). The included documentation is actually quite good, though.

    Some content of note: There are some models in a directory labeled "C17" (which I assume is City 17) that can be viewed in the model viewer/placed into maps with hammer. Interesting content, though I haven't seen any huge spoilers yet (just things like stoves and cupboards in the directory).

    1. Re:Semi-Available to the public by wolrahnaes · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "You need to have pre-order HL 2 on Steam to have access to the SDK, right now.

      Well that makes sense, because it's kinda hard to test your levels without having the game. Those who preordered have CS:S to test with. Those who haven't preordered either don't have the game, and thus have no reason to make a map for it, or they have a pirated copy of CS:S and Valve shouldn't give a shit about them anyways.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    2. Re:Semi-Available to the public by dr_d_19 · · Score: 1

      Some content of note: There are some models in a directory labeled "C17" (which I assume is City 17) that can be viewed in the model viewer/placed into maps with hammer. Interesting content, though I haven't seen any huge spoilers yet (just things like stoves and cupboards in the directory).

      Argh! Everyone knows that last missing piece of the previously leaked HL2 stories - the last detail before we uncover the true ending - was the matter of the cupboard and the stove! Now it's obvious that Gorden choses "nay" instead of "'neal" at the end!

      THANKS ALOT MATE!

    3. Re:Semi-Available to the public by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Well....I could be making a map for someone who does have the game.

      This is the problem that I'm having right now.

    4. Re:Semi-Available to the public by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      So you're trying to tell me that you will be making a map for a game which you do not posess?

      How will you debug and test the map? Obviously you would need to go to your friend's computer, at which point you're almost better off just developing it straight on their rig.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    5. Re:Semi-Available to the public by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      And when the full SDK comes out? I can't debug it, but I can write some of the code.

  6. No code... yet by Wheaty18 · · Score: -1, Redundant

    As someone mentioned above, only the map and modelling tools are available with this precursor to the "full" SDK, which should become available soon after Nov 16.

  7. WOOT! by SF9067 · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    http://tinyurl.com/5bwrf Hey- Check out this great site that is giving away totally free photo iPods! I've joined and I think you should as well. It's a completely legitimate offer, and this company has already given away $4 million in free stuff! All you have to do is join, complete and online offer, and refer friends to do the same. That's it! Here is my referral link. To help me get my photo iPod, click this exact link to join, or copy and paste it into a browser: http://tinyurl.com/5bwrf

  8. mod down parent, spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sick of free iPods

  9. Where is the SDK? by GR1NCH · · Score: 1

    It says the SDK is out on steam but I can't seem to find it anywhere on steam. Does anyone know how to get to it?

    1. Re:Where is the SDK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Plug your kettle in and turn it on.

    2. Re:Where is the SDK? by Magnakai · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you've pre-ordered HL2, it'll be at the bottom of the Play Games list, next to the dedicated servers.

  10. Sorry Valve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice try, but still not getting me to install Steam.
    *joins queue waiting for craxX0red version*

  11. Ugh, moderators? The guy's name is even TROLL. by Kelmenson · · Score: 1

    Wonderful for the moderators to mod him "informative" even though everything he's saying is garbage.

  12. FAQ by patternjuggler · · Score: 1

    Having installed steam, how do I get the SDK?

    1. Re:FAQ by patternjuggler · · Score: 1

      Oh, I have to pre-order HL2. Never mind...

  13. This is Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone know when Duke Nukem 4 will be released?

  14. Source runs fine; better than D3 by slagish666 · · Score: 1
    It's not like D3. On the CS:S video stress test, I get near 80fps on my 2500+ ATI 9800 (128MB) 1GB RAM system. In D3 timedemo, I can barely squeak out 40. I know the D3 timedemo is more complex, but still, CS:Source is as smooth as a baby's bottom, but D3 is rough like my own ass.

    --
    "Consider the lillies of the goddamn field."