Slashdot Mirror


Best Buy: 20% Of Customers Are Wrong

Mr Show writes "Ars Technica has an article up discussing Best Buy's strategies to drive off the deal hunters. It's a good follow up to the Slashdot story from back in July, and offers some details on what they're actually trying to do."

35 of 1,234 comments (clear)

  1. Best Buy is not that evil... by lothar97 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't buy anything from them, but hear me out. Best Buy is a for-profit company (pubicly traded), and legally a corporation's loyalty (at least in theory) is ultimately to the shareholders (Enron et al made a mockery of this). This duty means that the corporation has to increase the value to shareholders, either through dividends, profits, increase share price, etc. I'm not saying I agree with it, but that's the idea. So, Best Buy has some "devil" customers, and they're losing money off of these devils. From TFA:

    The devils are its worst customers. They buy products, apply for rebates, return the purchases, then buy them back at returned-merchandise discounts.

    Kudos to the people who figured this out, but clearly it is costing Best Buy money. These are customers that should be weeded out. It's Best Buy's fault for allowing this scenario to happen.

    Once someone discovers something that is "too good to be true" like the returning scenario, many people start doing it, and the company catches on. Since they're losing money, they stop it.

    The other things in TFA, like profiling customers and selling them what their profile dictates is just common sales practice. Sure they might be forcing people to get things they might not want/need, but then again, when was the last time a sales person tried to sell you something you don't need (car options, clothes, dinner specials, etc). It's the nature of capitalism to increase the profits.

    --

    1. Re:Best Buy is not that evil... by div_B · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Kudos to the people who figured this out, but clearly it is costing Best Buy money. These are customers that should be weeded out. It's Best Buy's fault for allowing this scenario to happen.

      Frankly, if they're not being evil, they're atleast being a bit cheeky. From TFA:

      They ["devils"] slap down rock-bottom price quotes from Web sites and demand that Best Buy make good on its lowest-price pledge.

      If they don't want to sell things at the lowest-price, then they shouldn't pledge to. Problem solved. But of course, that's no good, because what they really want is to give people the perception that they can get things for the lowest prices, without actually following through on it. My heart bleeds for them.

    2. Re:Best Buy is not that evil... by mdfst13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "These are customers that should be weeded out."

      Or Best Buy could just stop trying to fool their customers into thinking that they are getting a deal when they are really being screwed over. If Best Buy did not have crazy rebates, then they wouldn't be having people abuse them.

      It's like how Microsoft claims to lose money on each XBox sold. If people buying XBoxes to use as MythTV frontends costs Microsoft money, then maybe Microsoft should quit subsidizing the XBox. Problem solved.

      Personally, I think that customers buying Best Buy products purely for the rebates is great. It helps make up for the fact that 80+% of all rebates go unredeemed. Note that even if you subtract out the returned products from the sales and still include those rebates as redeemed, they still make up a redemption rate of less than 50%. Perhaps Best Buy will eventually drop rebates and just lower their ridiculous prices! Or they will just go out of business and I will continue to buy from Circuit City and the web. Either way works for me.

  2. Re:Not an upsatanding policy by rev0102 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, but I think they've made it clear they don't want your business anyway :)

  3. I love the letter that announced that change by joeflies · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I don't remember it word for word, but in essence, it said "Based on customer feedback, you'll now earn rewards for every $125 of purchases".

    I wonder to myself ... what customer gave feedback that they wanted to the program to be more difficult to earn rewards?

    1. Re:I love the letter that announced that change by Speare · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All I can say is, "The chocolate ration will be increased to 20 grams."

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    2. Re:I love the letter that announced that change by telstar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My favorite line from the cable rate hike letter is:

      "We promise you that you will not get another rate hike for another year."

      Actually they're promising that they'll raise my rates again exactly one year from now!

    3. Re:I love the letter that announced that change by Kombat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What is wrong with the world we live in when "Customers" actaully want to get a fair price and good product for their moeny. Shame on them.

      You're over-simplifying. Define "fair price." How do you know that the current prices are not "fair?" If they are able to produce increased profits year-over-year, instead of just continually breaking-even, does that mean they're "ripping you off?" Should a company be content with simply breaking-even, or holding steady at 5% profit every year?

      Now the big question: Should the shareholders be happy? You want to retire someday, don't you? Presumeably, you'll invest in stocks, bonds, and mutual funds. You'll demand what you consider a "reasonable" rate of return on those stocks and mutual funds, right? What's "reasonable?" It has to be better than savings bonds or GICs, so we're talking at least 6-8%. How is a privately held company supposed to increase its stock price continually by 8% annually? Answer: By continually increasing profits.

      See, people like you fail to see the big picture. You want to have your cake and eat it too. You don't want companies you BUY from to make any profit at all, yet you want companies you will INVEST in to beat the market and allow you to retire in comfort. I'm guessing you're presently not too involved in investing? Perhaps you're unaware that these evil, faceless "shareholders" that everyone is always villainizing are mostly just ordinary folks like you, me, and our parents, trying to make enough money to survive in retirement.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  4. Those who know most issue recommendations by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sure everybody who reads Slashdot has been in the position of being asked by their non-geek friends and family about potential purchases... so the customers that Best Buy sees as losers may have a bunch of profitable customers behind them that they could very easily send to Circuit City instead. I wonder if Best Buy's models take that into account.

    1. Re:Those who know most issue recommendations by plover · · Score: 3, Insightful
      True, but I'd pick a different example than Circuit Shitty. I have been so disappointed every single time I've walked through their doors that I may never bother returning.

      I've gotten in the habit of going to the local stores first, then Best Buy as a second choice (only if I need to.) I'm spending more money in some cases, and less money in others, but my overall satisfaction with my purchases is much higher.

      And while some people seem to enjoy the game of shopping in a store with a knowledgable staff, then purchasing the product online at a steep discount, I'm not one of them. I know that when I went to National Camera to purchase my Canon G2 that the salesman helped me for over an hour (even while the store was packed with customers.) He showed me the details of each camera, options, discussed battery life, etc. I know I received at least $60 worth of advice from him that day, and purchasing the camera from him at their retail price was very much worth it to me.

      The same experience has been true for me at other stores as well. I'm willing to pay for service, and I give out my recommendations commesurate with my experiences. As the family's "Tech Guru" my recommendations do carry some financial weight. Best Buy simply isn't my first choice for anything other than a simple "just get a little 13" TV at Best Buy" type recommendation.

      --
      John
  5. well of course they are by gnu-sucks · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Any retailer with a brain, so to speak, has people working in loss prevention. And of course, they want to eliminate fraud. The first level of defence is, of course, with employees. Then, its with customer policy, and finally, with best buy, its with the actuall customer base.

    This is probably a very intelligent scheme, and certainly the first of many from America's electonic retailers.

  6. "Pigeonholing Customers" by kjones692 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The thing that worries me the most about this policy is the concept of quickly "pigeonholing" customers and treating them a certain way depending on how you have categorized them.

    As a young adult, I run into plenty of prejudice among employees and managers (though most of it is annoying rather than seriously detrimental). Would they look at me, and decide, "Here is a young person. He doesn't have a lot of money, so we're not going to waste time helping him find what he wants, since he probably couldn't afford it anyway."

    What if they do the same thing based on ethnicity? or noticable disability? or a myriad of other potential factors that go into stereotyping?

    All I can do is hope that the free market will sort things out, and prove to Best Buy that this policy is hurtful to customers.

    --

    Love the Third Amendment?
  7. Not upstanding? by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They buy products, apply for rebates, return the purchases, then buy them back at returned-merchandise discounts.

    I wouldn't even stretch to call people who would do this shoppers. Thats not looking for the best deal, thats borderline robbery. If you engage in that sort of activity, I'm sure you promising to never shop there again is exactly what they want. Win/win.

    1. Re:Not upstanding? by ravenspear · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They buy products, apply for rebates, return the purchases, then buy them back at returned-merchandise discounts.

      I wouldn't even stretch to call people who would do this shoppers. Thats not looking for the best deal, thats borderline robbery. If you engage in that sort of activity, I'm sure you promising to never shop there again is exactly what they want.

      No I don't do that kind of stuff. I was referring more to the other parts.

      They load up on "loss leaders," severely discounted merchandise designed to boost store traffic, then flip the goods at a profit on eBay.

      That's not robbery. It's called commerce. Buy low, sell high. Nothing illegal or shady about it at all. Is Best Buy saying they don't want any of their customers to be able to sell any of the things they purchase?

      And then this:
      They slap down rock-bottom price quotes from Web sites and demand that Best Buy make good on its lowest-price pledge.

      Why even have a lowest price pledge if you aren't going to honor it?

      Sorry but Best Buy is not the injured party here. They are simply bitching because selling to consumers who exercise some initiative makes it slightly less easy for them to earn maximum profit.

    2. Re:Not upstanding? by Southpaw018 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why even have a lowest price pledge if you aren't going to honor it?

      The purpose of a "low price guarantee" like that is ensuring that your prices are competitive. The problem comes in when someone can find a quote at a particularly shady outfit on Pricewatch or Pricegrabber, favorites of companies who deal in subpar and even stolen goods. The linked company was just the first in the list on a quick search for "lowest ratings" on Pricegrabber; there are pages upon pages more.

      Anyhow, as I was saying: the problem comes in when I can get a price quote from some guy selling stolen goods out of his room in the basement of his Mom's house, then take that to Best Buy and demand they give me the same price. That's just unfair. Best Buy may be a buy-low-sell-high retailer out to make money, but they're following the letter of the law. Taking advantage of that seems like a devil to me.

      --
      ACs are modded -6. I don't read you, I don't mod you, I don't see you. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
    3. Re:Not upstanding? by Hobadee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When I bought the WarCraftIII battle chest, I first looked online for pricing. I found a website that was selling it for $30. I went to Best Buy. They wouldn't give me a discount, so I went to CompUSA. CompUSA first said "We don't honor on-line ads.", but then the guy went and asked his manager, and I got it for $30! Moral of this story? I'm going to CompUSA from now on! If you're nice to your customers, they will come back, and in the end, you will turn a profit, because although they are buying discounted, they keep returning to you instead of someone else!

      --
      ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
    4. Re:Not upstanding? by expro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I used an ad to get a price match at a retailer that I will not name. The competitor was local, and they DID have the item in stock. The salesdrone asked me "Well, why didn't you buy it there?" as if I were annoying him just by trying to spend my money there.

      So, why didn't you buy it there? Reward the retailer who was willing to discount without any prodding.

      Often, if you take advantage of price matching, the retailer then goes back to his supplier and puts pressure on the supplier to stop supplying the usually-smaller business that is undercutting him. This happens all the time.

      I believe there is an ethical problem with taking advantage of price matching. Just go buy it at the better price. If you doon't want to deal with the person making the lower price, pay the higher price. Don't punish the person competing and thus keeping prices low.

    5. Re:Not upstanding? by leonbev · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No offense man, but companies like Best Buy and CompUSA don't WANT people like you as a customer. That was the whole point of the article! They aren't making much of a profit selling you that copy of WC3 for only $30 to begin with, and they probably LOST money on the sale once you factored in the time that you spent nagging the sales clerk and manager for your discount.

      CompUSA and Best Buy cater to rich gadget freaks and clueless newbies because THEY are the kinds of people who will pay retail price and leave the store without thinking twice about it. The math is simple here... Higher product profit margins plus lower sales staffing costs equals MORE MONEY FOR THEM. By ignoring savvy shoppers like you, they're actually increasing their profits in the long run.

  8. Who needs the training? by thundergeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They said they are putting their employees through hours of training on how to interview us customers.

    Shouldn't they be training them on the stuff they sell?

    Everytime I go in there to buy a camera, I'm usually faced with a deer-in-headlights sales man who only know how to say, "I'm sure it's in the manual." And I end up helping the poor helpless chap next to me who thinks a 9 mega pixel still camera will produce wide screen movies!!

    Get real Best Buy!

  9. Extended Warranties by LiquidHAL · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Another trick Best Buy has is the extended warranty. It sounds like a great idea, and it is. Extended two year warranty, no questions asked, for a few extra dollars. However, you need the warranty receipt. Most people lose it after a few months, usually sooner, or totally forget about it. Two years is a long time. Only a small percentage of those who get the warranty actually cash it in so to speak. That's where a lot of their profits are coming from.

  10. Re:Words to Best Buy: Suck it up by fpga_guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People scamming the rebate schemes is a valid response to what is, in essence, a totally anti-consumer practice. I'm amazed that it's even legal to offer these false discounts, and artificially inflated prices.

  11. Play Acting by Moby+Cock · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The next time I go into Best Buys (or Future Shop in Canada; they are the same company) I am going to try an act like a Barry or a Buzz and see what kind of interest I get.

    It seems that the publishing of this info is going to hurt Best Buy the most. If they were to target their *devil* customers and kept it on the lo-down, maybe nobody would have noticed. Having it on /. has got to be a bad deal for them.

    Thanks for the idea about getting a rebate (although I still hate them) and then returning the product. That's a great plan. I'll be sure to try it out this weekend.

  12. Best Buy may want to be careful by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I fit the profile of a "bad" customer: I watch the rebates and advertised prices and make sure I'm not paying more than I have to. They probably want to be rid of me. But, when it comes to computer parts and systems, a lot of my friends who fit the "good" BB profile come to me for a recommendation. If BestBuy's been pushing me out, you can bet I'm not going to recommend going to them. End result: annoying me, the "bad" customer, causes "good" customers to end up somewhere else.

  13. Re:Words to Best Buy: Suck it up by teromajusa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People are abusing those benefits Best Buy provides.

    Using every loophole available isn't abuse. Its business. Do you think Best Buy's accountants look at some obscure tax regulation and say "well, this would save us alot of money, but it really wasn't meant to be used this way"? I don't think people owe corparations any more moral consideration than corporations typically excersize towards people.

  14. Re:Words to Best Buy: Suck it up by dhakbar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I totally agree.

    Why is it acceptable for a business to play the government's rules, but it is not acceptable for the consumers to play the business' rules?

    Self-interest is what drives capitalism. Best Buy can suck it.

  15. The only fair price is the lowest price by shoemakc · · Score: 3, Insightful


    I knew this would make them come out of the woodwork.....that certain demographic of people who somehow think that the only fair price, is the :::lowest::: price.

    There's more to shopping then just price folks, and that attitude is exactly what led us to the situation we find outselves into today. There used to be a large number, of helpfull, friendly, local audio / tv / computer stores....but over time people passed them up to go to a larger box store...then an even larger box store and now these.

    What motivation does a business have to provide good service when they know their "clients" would abandon them in a heartbeat just to save a few pennies on the dollar? Then.. .then....have the nerve to claim they're being ripped off?

    Hmm...hadn't meant to turn this into a rant...but I guess it just kinda headed that way.

    -Chris

    --
    --an unbreakable toy is useful for breaking other toys--
  16. Re:Why not just drop rebates by Zathras26 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What they're hoping for is that you'll buy the item at the in-store price, then not bother to go thru all the yadda-yadda that you have to go thru and wait six to eight weeks to get the rebate. A rebate is a way that a retailer can make an item look as though it costs less than it actually does; they don't actually want to sell you the item at the lower price. If they did, they would, as you say, simply mark the price down.

  17. Re:Profiling 101 by frohike · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's pretty funny (and probably true, your post even puts a picture in my head... *shudder* :)

    But there are actually legitimate reasons why people would want those sorts of components. Namely if you are a hardware experimenter. I bought a good number of pieces of "throwaway" equipment at Goodwill Computers in Austin because I wanted to rip a rare component off of it, take its connectors, or even just have a piece of test equipment (one of my projects involved building an ISA bus).

    It had nothing to do with the price, I probably would have been willing to pay more than the going rate for an equivalent piece of modern equipment in some cases. Finding a store that actually stocks that stuff is pretty hard these days. After I moved away from Austin I ended up having to wait until I took a visit back there to get some stuff like that!

  18. Re:Wear a Name tag! by ergo98 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you are hostile towards your customers (like the ??AA) your revenues will shrink, and you will find yourself in a viscious cycle fighting with your customers and losing money in the process!

    Several years back, when the Diamond was a big name in the video card market, and 3dfx was the king of the hill, I frequented comp.hardware.ibm.pc.video -- many of the forum regulars made no bones about the fact that they were devil customers: They purposefully would "buy" a video card, hold it for just under the return period, and then return it. They'd get a full refund of their original purchase price which they'd use to buy whatever was new (again starting the return clock anew). These customers are hugely costly for retailers -- it would be better not to have them as customers (in fact you wish them on your competitors). This sort of person will rationalize their behaviour (much like the cable modem user who rationalizes saturating their connection 24 hours a day) under the guise of "if they let me, let them suck it!", but the end result is naturally restrictive policies that hurt everyone because of the abuses of a few. Simliarly it isn't cost effective to have customers who'll bogart your salespeople's time for hours while they ruminate over a trivial decision -- one which they'll likely recant on, reappearing in your returns line. These people do exist.

  19. Re:Wear a Name tag! by humblecoder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What Best Buy has done is change their practices to cut down on the amount of outright abuse. Personally, mail in rebates tick me off, so I am not about to spend my money at Best Buy, but I can understand why they would change their policy. I would also bet that most people won't even notice the difference. The only people that care are the Devil Customers that were abusing Best Buys' policies.


    Instead of instituting things like "restocking fees" and draconian return policies which effect ALL customers, both angels and devils, why doesn't Best Buy actually institute policies to address the core problem.

    If people are buying items, collecting rebates, and returning them, why doesn't Best Buy just deduct the amount of the rebate from the credit? Simply match up an ID number on the return receipt with an ID number from the submitted rebate receipt. If the rebate has been submitted but not processed, simply flag the rebate in the system as denied, so the person doesn't receive the rebate after the fact.

    Those are just two ideas off the top of my head that will solve the problem without alienating your "good" customers.

  20. Re:Best Buy's Reward Zone now ignores rebates by guarddonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The best way to combat the new policies I've found is to use their 'double points' offer for using the Best Buy CC.

    The best example is when buying a video game. I go in to pick up GTA:SA, get the game, and get one of their 'Gamer Giftcards' (a coupon on the back of the case gives you 5 dollars off a game price $20 dollars or more). You go up to the register and make a pile for the gift card, and then leave the out of reach of the clerk. You buy the gift card using your Best Buy CC, putting fifty bucks on the card. This gives you $100 dollars towards the new minimum. You then take the gift card and the aforementioned coupon from the gift card case and proceed to check out with the game. The coupon from the back of the gift card takes care of tax (effectively) and you use your reward zone card with the gift card to buy the game, giving you $150 towards the new minimum and earning you $5 in Best Buy bucks for a $50 dollar purchase.

    The decent clerks just get pissed about having to do two transactions and send you on your way, but the extra time this takes is more than made up for by the joy in watching someone who takes clerkin' at Best Buy way too seriously scan your cards over and over again trying to figure out a way to prevent you from doing this. I love leaving their checkout and looking back at the line that has formed behind me while I give them the old lady with a coupon act.

    Just out of spite, any purchase over 20 bucks now results in a gift card purchase first.

  21. after tax rebat? by iplayfast · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hate mail in rebates. It's just a way of giving the government more money. Let's say you buy something for $100 on "sale" for $75. Only trick is you've got to pay tax on $100 in order to buy it, for $75!?!

    In Canada that's 15%. So instead of paying $11.25 in tax you are paying $15. So your sale prices of $75 is actually $78.75. I know it's only three dollars, but dammit I'm cheap!^H^H^H^H^H^it's the principle of the thing!

    Not only that, in order to get the mail in rebate it costs you postage. There's another 50 cents. And my time. (That's gotta be worth at least $20 per hour flippen burgers, so it takes me 5 minutes to fill in the stuff. 5 minutes to find a stamp. 15 minutes to walk down to the mailbox, 15 minutes to walk back.)

    Hey this rebate is COSTING ME MONEY!

    Hey Best Buy/Future Shop! Why not just put it on sale if you want to put it on sale. Why give your consumers more problems. One of the reasons I perfer to buy from the small independants. (No I'm not a devil customer. I'm not a customer at all!)

  22. Check your controls/variables by Apotsy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Leave out the "ratty old clothes" next time and see what effect that has.

  23. Re:shopping cart cost... by zakezuke · · Score: 3, Insightful

    shopping carts cost $100???

    Have a look at your neighborhood shopping cart. Those chrome plated wire mesh suckers with a weld at every joint. Take the time to sit in one and roll around. I don't know what they are rated for but they can support the weight of two adults easily (don't ask). These suckers are not cheap, think $500/$1000 a unit easily. They don't look like much but alot of work goes into that shopping cart.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  24. Re:Shopping cart madness by apt142 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Have you ever been to an Aldi's? It's an ultra cheap grocery store chain in the US. They don't have baggers and often only have 1 or 2 cashiers on duty. Staff is a minimal. Here's the kicker: I've never seen a discarded Aldi's shopping cart. They are always nicely and neatly put away. Even with no baggers to round them up.

    ALWAYS!

    Do you know why? In order to get a cart you have to put a quarter into the lock to get them out. When you are done, you can get that quarter back if you put your cart back. Only if you put the cart back.

    What does that tell you about humans and their values?