Slashdot Mirror


Is Microsoft Crawling Google?

triplecoil writes "Jason Dowdell over at WebProNews has written a piece questioning a tactic Microsoft might be using to beef up its new search engine. He thinks they might be dipping into Google's results to supplement its own. Dowdell likens it to leaving your garbage on the curb--anyone could conceivably go through it and take whatever is there for their own."

30 of 480 comments (clear)

  1. You don't say! by xerocube · · Score: 1, Funny

    You mean M$ is searching through somebody else's stuff? Well... I'll be damned...

    1. Re:You don't say! by Ryan+Stortz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wasn't that the "plot" to the movie Anti-Trust?

      --
      Bugs are just features that have been fixed.
    2. Re:You don't say! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      They're not searching Google's porn links fast enough.

    3. Re:You don't say! by cortana · · Score: 4, Funny

      Movie? I thought that thing was a documentary!

  2. Yea, and by BrianGa · · Score: 5, Funny

    The new search engine's name will be Mooglesoft.

    1. Re:Yea, and by MooseByte · · Score: 4, Funny

      "The new search engine's name will be Mooglesoft."

      Which will subsequently be sued by SCOogle, the latest startup from The Canopy Group, after announcing they purchased the rights to the Internet in a complex transaction which is documented in a briefcase somewhere in Germany.

    2. Re:Yea, and by meabolex · · Score: 3, Funny

      Initiating a Mooglesoft search:

      Instead of clicking a button named Google Search, it simply says "KupoKupo!"

      You are then returned a page where 100% of the text is the word "Kupo"

      This is slightly less optimized than a Marklar search (which at least has some words other than 'Marklar').

      --
      FORTUNE FAVORS IRONY
  3. But will this mean Google can crawl back? by biffnix · · Score: 5, Funny

    Couldn't Google just crawl Microsoft in return? Then they'd be stuck in an endless loop, and William Shatner can then swoop in, crack some skulls, and save the day.

    Or something like that.

    biffnix

    --
    Don't Die Wondering
  4. Microsoft stealing someone elses technology??? by Shant3030 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nah, never happens....

    --
    100% Insightful
  5. Try this term on MSN search by bbzzdd · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:Try this term on MSN search by JohnnyKlunk · · Score: 5, Funny

      OK. This is really freaky. Try

      more evil than god and you get FIREFOX as the first result (then google, of course)

    2. Re:Try this term on MSN search by finkployd · · Score: 4, Funny

      That they put google up there as the number one search result is not that surprising. What gets me is they have themselves at number four.

    3. Re:Try this term on MSN search by }InFuZeD{ · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not sure if it's funnier that Google is #1, or that Microsoft lists itself as #4.

    4. Re:Try this term on MSN search by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Realize it takes into account popularity of the site, and occurence of the words, and I believe thw word types are ranked too, nouns before verbs before adjectives before adverbs.

      The Firefox page is fairly popular, and the words "more" and "than" appear over and over, as with Google. (Uh, googles motto "do no evil" wouldn't hit another word, hmmmmmmmmm)

      Try this one (seriously): more gay than slashdot

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    5. Re:Try this term on MSN search by mormop · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not so much so much the result that scares me as the thought processes that led you to try it ;)

      --
      Hmmmmmm..... Deep fried and look like Squirrel.
  6. They wouldn't... by Wrathie · · Score: 4, Funny

    Such trouble. Just buy the damned company.

    1. Re:They wouldn't... by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Funny

      Such trouble. Just buy the damned company.

      Come on, be serious. Google doesn't plan to buy Microsoft until *after* they reach the one-year post-IPO mark, silly.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  7. Shocked I tell you by finkployd · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, that kind of business practice would be completely out of character for Microsoft.

    This is a non-story. A good Slashdot headline will be when they get caught actually NOT doing something like this.

    Microsoft Has Original Idea and Implements it By Themselves
    From the 70%-of-slashdot-editors-suffered-heart-attacks -reading-this-submission Dept.

    1. Re:Shocked I tell you by oGMo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Microsoft releases "Bob"
      From the laugh-it's-funny Dept.

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

  8. Re:Difficult to do if Google doesn't want them to by carpe_noctem · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why stop there? Google should just ban all of Microsoft's netblocks to prevent their employees from gathering useful information from them...

    "Begun, this war of the corporations has!"

    --
    "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
  9. Google is Catholic? by TheAmazingBob · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Google happily changed its habbits..."

    Google is Catholic?

  10. Re:Difficult to do if Google doesn't want them to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft could create a new distributed crawler that comes bundled with Windows! Every Windows user could crawl Google for them, and then Google's only option would be to block everyone using an MS product.

    Remember, helping Microsoft is like helping yourself.

  11. In other news... by dfj225 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft's beta search engine's index doubled in size to over 8 billion pages.

    --
    SIGFAULT
  12. Hey Google, please don't make us... by potus98 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey Google, please don't make us read those wacky JPG/GIF letter scrambles with criss-cross lines and input the random characters into a field before submitting a search.

    "Hold on a sec while I Goog- Huh? Grrrr.... H... P... 7... O... wait no, 7... zero... ummm...

    --
    This one gang kept wanting me to join cause I'm pretty good with a bo staff.
  13. Re:Don't concern yourself with this crap... by gUmbi · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you don't want people (or bots) viewing it then password protect it or take it off the public interweb.

    Interweb? Is that the same as the 'Information superhighway'?

  14. Re:Don't concern yourself with this crap... by Thumpnugget · · Score: 3, Funny

    Interweb? Is that the same as the 'Information superhighway'?

    They're very similar. One notable difference is that the Information Superhighway was invented by Al Gore.

    --
    Free yourself. Everything else will follow.
  15. Re:Don't concern yourself with this crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    In the early days of MSN Bot, it ate up about 4 GB of my bandwidth on ONE html page, requesting it constantly, every few seconds for days! I emailed Microsoft and they replied with a 'oops, we found the problem'. That doesn't pay my bandwidth overage changes, does it?

  16. Re:Don't concern yourself with this crap... by nofx_3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, but I invented the "Information Historic Old Country Road" its not fast, and there ain't much information, but its so durn quaint you gotta love it.

    -kaplanfx

    --
    Visualize Whirled Peas
  17. Re:Don't block them! by NuclearDog · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or just return a bunch of fake links:

    "Madame X's House of Leather"
    "Hot slutty teens!"
    "Wet & Wild College Girls!"

    Etc.

    Microsoft would stop leeching REAL quick.

    --
    This statement is forty-five characters long.
  18. what ridiculous logic... by the-build-chicken · · Score: 4, Funny


    microsoft is looking at old pages, google uses a cache...ergo microsoft must be using google.

    if we're going to use that kind of logic, I could just as easily come up with "afghanistan is in the middle east and supports terrorist, iraq is in the middle east...ergo, iraq must support terrorists", and use it to make a case for invading iraq...but you don't see......oh wait