Slashdot Mirror


WinAmp's Death Greatly Exaggerated

robyannetta writes "In a previous story, we heard that WinAmp was down for the count. Apparently, this is not the case. Here is a note by Eric Caoili that says "No we weren't axed. We haven't even seen anyone with an axe. There was this one guy who came up to us to axe us a question, but that's about it.""

40 of 410 comments (clear)

  1. Right place, wrong time for this joke by seanadams.com · · Score: 3, Funny

    There was this one guy who came up to us to axe us a question, but that's about it.

    Did you hear OJ's son confessed to the murder?

    He wanted to see a movie, and OJ said I dunno - go axe your mom.

  2. Can I axe you a question? by mfh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why didn't you guys plan an exit event when AOL bought you? Why stick around in a new corporate culture anyway?

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  3. I would be curious to know... by JessLeah · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...who of the original lineup of Nullsoft/Winamp coders are still there.... and how many people are working on it now vs. when it was in the Winamp 1.0/2.0 stages...

    1. Re:I would be curious to know... by Snork+Asaurus · · Score: 4, Funny
      who of the original lineup of Nullsoft/Winamp coders are still there

      Just the llama, who always carried most of the load anyway.

      --
      Sigs are bad for your health.
  4. netcraft, anyone? by khrtt · · Score: 4, Funny

    What, an "early demise" article, and no mention of netcraft?

  5. What's not a joke... by AlexTheBeast · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's not a joke is that any news is good news.

    For one brief instant we all figured winamp was dead. The internet news sites picked it up, people were downloading every version known to man for archive, and we were all focused on winamp once again.

    Welcome to the world of the rumor-feeding news cycle.

    We have been played.

    1. Re:What's not a joke... by xenobyte · · Score: 3, Informative

      For one brief instant we all figured winamp was dead. The internet news sites picked it up, people were downloading every version known to man for archive, and we were all focused on winamp once again.

      Welcome to the world of the rumor-feeding news cycle.

      We have been played.


      Actually, if it was a scheme by the WinAmp people to get attention, it backfired on my behalf... I went looking for a replacement and found Quintessential Player. It offers what I need, including Ogg-support and my favorite skin, so I switched and it'll take some serious incentive before I switch back.

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
  6. Great News. by ween14 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It is great to hear that Winamp isn't dead. I have been using it for 5 years now and haven't found a better media player yet. It is both small and quick, Windows Media Player is neither. Not to mention that I have yet to find a sound file that I couldn't get it to play, where many of my files just refuse to play in iTunes or WMP.

    --
    Java has no friends.
    1. Re:Great News. by calculadoru · · Score: 5, Funny

      Winamp is a nice piece of software indeed, but I take it you have never tried this.
      Much, much better. Uses less memory, plays anything you throw at it, great community, it's free - anything else I'm missing?
      Also, please stop mentioning WMP. This is Slashdot, after all.

      --
      The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. -- G.B. Shaw
    2. Re:Great News. by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 4, Interesting

      To be fair, there is/was a version of winamp for linux. A really bad version, but a version nonetheless.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
  7. Funky Street Jive by BRock97 · · Score: 4, Funny

    There was this one guy who came up to us to axe us a question...

    Ah, nothing like computer nerds using slang..... It's so cute yet so disturbing.

    --

    Bryan R.
    The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, or $12.50 as seen on eBay.....
    1. Re:Funky Street Jive by Goner · · Score: 4, Interesting

      yeah, it's no jive, the word is metathesis, the most shining example being the word wednesday. google it.

  8. Winamp = dead in my book by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Winamp stopped adding useful features / improvements (for me) after version 3.0... iTunes and WMP10 are much better, with song rating / automatic playlists (song I didn't heard in the past week I like, yes thank you).

    Why anyone would pay for Winamp is beyond me. The free version does the job... like a bunch of programs out there. Of course, brand recognition, nostalgy and all...

    1. Re:Winamp = dead in my book by jsrlepage · · Score: 3, Informative

      Rating System? Winamp5... Check.

      Automatic playlists? Make lists with search queries... Check.

      iPod management plugin? ummm... Check.

      What were you saying again?

      --
      This is my opinion. Everyone has a right to my opinion.
    2. Re:Winamp = dead in my book by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 4, Informative

      Winamp still has one advantage--the huge collection of plugins. I'm a video game music junkie, and the only reason I still run winamp is to play SPCs, NSFs, PSFs--the dumps from the audio processing of emulated games. If iTunes could use winamp input plugins, I'd use it all the time.

    3. Re:Winamp = dead in my book by Thaelon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Winamp stopped adding useful features / improvements (for me) after version 3.0... iTunes and WMP10 are much better, with song rating / automatic playlists (song I didn't heard in the past week I like, yes thank you).

      Why anyone would pay for Winamp is beyond me. The free version does the job... like a bunch of programs out there. Of course, brand recognition, nostalgy and all...


      Yes, they never added any wonderful features like WM & iTunes, such as DRM. I love winamp, I've used it since early 2.xx. It's small, works well, is minimilistic, tastefully designed, has responded to multimedia keyboard actions for a long time, it has great visualizations. I have a 20GB iPod, and the playlists I make in Winamp are usable by Ephpod to load onto my iPod. I don't use iTunes because it only allows you to synchronize your iPod with ONE computer. Ephod doesn't care if you plug your iPod into 9 different computers and get songs from all of them. If you tried that with iTunes it would replace everything on the iPod with what was on that particular computer.

      Sure I kinda liked the rating thing, but iTunes' playlist support sucks ass.

      Most succinctly put: WM, iTunes, Real Whateverthefuckthey'recallingitnow, and especially Musicmatch PieceOfShitBox are all bloated pieces of crap. Not to mention you can get a virtually limitless supply of plugins for winamp to do damn near anything. Some people want to be able to burn playlists from Winamp. The free version is plenty for me personally.

      --

      Question everything

    4. Re:Winamp = dead in my book by jettoblack · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've tried several versions of iTunes now, and I just don't like it. Where are the customization options? I'm not just talking about skins and interface and such... everything just seems very inflexible. If you use iTunes and only iTunes for all of your ripping/downloads, then I'm sure its great. But if you're using other programs to aquire and manage music, it sucks.

      For example, if I download/rip some songs outside of iTunes, how do you make iTunes rescan your music folder? You can't... you have to manually add all the new tracks or folders. You can add the whole music folder again, but it takes forever, and then all of your tracks will be listed twice and there's no easy way to delete them. (You can list them with the duplicate tracks tool, but I find it to be FAR too loose with its rules, for example, it thinks "Intro Theme (3:20)" and "Intro Theme (TV version) (0:30)" are the same track.) Meanwhile, Winamp 5 can very quickly and automatically rescan my music folder for new songs or changed tags.

      Also, after using iTunes to edit some ID3 tags, my database ended up corrupted and I had to delete it. Fortunately I had only been using iTunes for a few hours, or I would have lost all of my song play counts, playlists, etc. Go to Apple's support forums and you'll see database corruption is a frequently occurring and very annoying issue.

      I can understand the iPod not being able to play WMA/OGG/FLAC/etc. for now due to limited CPU power (even though lots of other MP3 players can do it just fine), but I don't see any reason why iTunes shouldn't be able to play them.

      For me, Winamp 5 is the only tool that gets the job done, and I'm relieved to see it will be sticking around!

    5. Re:Winamp = dead in my book by medeii · · Score: 3, Informative

      Doesn't sound like you've really tried iTunes at all, actually. Let's look at this paragraph:

      For example, if I download/rip some songs outside of iTunes, how do you make iTunes rescan your music folder? You can't... you have to manually add all the new tracks or folders.

      Simple solution: drag-and-drop the files from the folder into iTunes. It's a song database, not a filesystem with automatic indexing, and it's never been touted as such.

      You can add the whole music folder again, but it takes forever, and then all of your tracks will be listed twice and there's no easy way to delete them.

      Or you can add the specific songs you just ripped or downloaded, instead of dropping the entire music folder again. And of course it takes forever, if you're telling iTunes to make duplicate entries.

      (You can list them with the duplicate tracks tool, but I find it to be FAR too loose with its rules, for example, it thinks "Intro Theme (3:20)" and "Intro Theme (TV version) (0:30)" are the same track.)

      So now you're whining because you told it to create duplicates but it's not identifying them as precisely as you'd like so you can remove them after the fact?

      Meanwhile, Winamp 5 can very quickly and automatically rescan my music folder for new songs or changed tags.

      Meanwhile, Winamp can't rip and burn CDs unless you pay for the functionality, doesn't provide an easy way to share songs across a network (no, shoutcast is neither easy nor simple), and you have to use third-party tools with limited features to sync with your iPod. I agree that Winamp has some advantages over iTunes, like a smaller memory footprint, but your problems with iTunes all seem to originate between the chair and your input device.

      --
      got standards? --- http://www.w3.org/
    6. Re:Winamp = dead in my book by damiam · · Score: 3, Informative
      Yes, they never added any wonderful features like WM & iTunes, such as DRM.

      Actually, they did. WinAMP will play FairPlay'd AAC using the Quicktime libs, the exact same way iTunes does (you might need a plugin, can't remember).

      If you tried that with iTunes it would replace everything on the iPod with what was on that particular computer.

      You can select manual control and copy whatever songs you want from however many iTunes libraries you want.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    7. Re:Winamp = dead in my book by bigberk · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Most succinctly put: WM, iTunes, Real Whateverthefuckthey'recallingitnow, and especially Musicmatch PieceOfShitBox are all bloated pieces of crap.
      Yup, that's it right there. Winamp 3.x scared some of us because it started to feel like a bloated piece of crap, but the developers were wise enough to restore the Winamp 2 look and feel into Winamp 5. Here is one piece of software where the latest version leaves me wanting nothing, and regretting nothing as far as upgrading! This is absolutely incredible because almost every other application I have stuck with over several years has become bloated, slowed down, and more confusing.

      Winamp, OTOH, has stayed nimble, acquired more features (like streaming video and media library) but without any detrimental effect on performance or stability. This is why Winamp is amazing and the developers are amazing. WinAmp is more stable than a llama suffering rigor mortis. I'm not impressed with iTunes because of its sluggishness and overcomplicated interface for doing something damn simple - playing an audio file or stream. Plus, iTunes and WM friends of mine aren't able to play my ogg vorbis streaming icecast station so I'm not too impressed by that either.
    8. Re:Winamp = dead in my book by mankey+wanker · · Score: 3, Informative

      I am a longtime WinAmp user also AND I still use it. I have tried other players and nothing comes close for all the reasons stated by others previously.

      I just wanted to "ditto" the comment above on the issue of bloatware. All too true.

      I run winamp 5 on a POS server that would have you gamer types just weeping with what a POS it is. I'm keeping it because it has ISA slots on the board and hell - it does the job. Winamp has no problems on that old POS system.

      Seriously, does it have to do more than just do it's intended job and be stable?

      I don't really get this talk about playlists and so on. Make your freaking playlist and save it for future use. Create a directory named M3U in your MP3 directory and then save your playlists there. What's the problem? Don't tell me you want automated playlists - get into your music, make your own freaking playlists just like a real music lover does.

  9. Winamp Unlimited by lotsofno · · Score: 5, Informative

    .

    Eric's site, Winamp Unlimited, expands a little on the Winamp situation, and also has comments on most of the news articles that've been published regarding the topic.

    If you missed it in the last discussion, he also has written a past article on what some of the ex-Nullsoft kids have been up to.

    It's weird talking about myself in the third person.

    .

  10. WinampTV... by euxneks · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just recently saw this on my dad's computer.. He was watching anime.. My dad was watching anime on WinampTV.. That was pretty cool..

    I just wish they had a version for Linux...

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  11. Its not your fathers winamp by maestro^ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been using winamp since .92 and ever since Justin left, maybe even when he sold out to AOL, it started to go downhill. Winamp is still the best player out there, but the passion, attention to detail and overall quality seems to have declined.

  12. Re:Axe you a question..hehehehe by lotsofno · · Score: 3, Interesting
    That is hilarious... Axe you a question.. that's making fun of black people right? Sweet racial slur. Right on. Right?
    Actually, I stole if from an episode of Home Movies. I think Jason said it.
  13. Re:Commodity software by Smidge204 · · Score: 4, Informative

    You are correct that it's a media player, and that there are lots of media players out there. But IMO, WinAMP is the ideal choice for music. WMP doesn't have the functionality and extendability that WinAMP has, and many other free media players are clogged up with overly fancy interfaces and/or just don't perform as well.

    WinAMP always was free. There's a "pro" version with extended capabilities, but at no point was there NOT a free version that did everything any other media player did (and often more).

    And I do not recall WinAMP ever being open source. There is an extensive SDK available, but the program itself is not available in source form... at least not through any legit channels that I could find.
    =Smidge=

  14. From their press release... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful



    to everyone who came out to show their support for us and who defended us when everyone was calling us gay.


    That is a nice little bit of homophobia from their press release. Real professional guys. Sheesh.

  15. Re:WinAmp has been dead for years by arodland · · Score: 4, Informative

    Perhaps you didn't notice because 3 scared you away, but 5 is far more closely related to 2 than 3. They realized how bad 3 sucked, and then skipped a whole digit just to tell you how cool 5 was. And it really is pretty nice. Better than what else is out there, anyway.

    All of the major security holes for Winamp that I recall had to do with the fact that it has a component that embeds Internet Explorer. And I've never seen a case of winamp-related "spyware" that doesn't involve either use of IE or other blatant stupidity.

    So back off :)

  16. Actually... by nwbvt · · Score: 3, Informative
    Those of us who actually RTFA last time know nowhere did it say Winamp was "down for the count", merely that the staff had been reduced. Which in the end is what happened in reality. Good job editors.

    Even in its corrections /. acts like a tabloid...

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  17. Re:It's funny. Laugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    to everyone who came out to show their support for us and who defended us when everyone was calling us niggers.

    Still think it is funny?

  18. Winamp hasn't stopped moving by Magickcat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It is dead, it's just hasn't stopped moving yet.

    Winamp is rapidly gaining the same level of "features" that Netscape did when it died - it's bloated and tries to sneakily add AOL icons to your desktop. Oh and let's not forget the spyware aspect to the commisions they get on sales - nice touch. The fact that the interface hasn't been made any easier to use, and only gets more fiddly and complicated confirms it. Winamp is the great golden flamingo God of bad user/interface design.

    All they need to do now is package AOL instant messenger with it, and it will be truly dead for ever more.

    Nobody knows how to fuck up a once perfectly good piece of software through bad decisions like AOL. You really know your software sucks with 100% full vacuum when your old version is actually better in every way over the latest release. Even Macromedia would be impressed with the sheer - "I wonder if the whole thing is running in some sort of emulator""-ness of it all.

    --

    Si tacuisses philosophus mansisses. If you had kept quiet, you would have remained a philosopher.

  19. Re:What's not a joke...Prophesy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is NOT the time or place for that joke--I'm still in mourning for the Lone Coder.

  20. Re:Axe you a question..hehehehe by NoTheory · · Score: 3, Informative

    Using a dialect to make a joke isn't a racial slur. It's an appeal to stereotype. And while linguistic stereotypes are often tied in the lay public to other sorts of stereotypes, such links are not an inherent part of language, and imo (and in the opinion of other linguists) linguistic stereotypes shouldn't be confused with racial or discriminatory stereotyping. Language use doesn't confine itself to racial borders.

    And besides, you could just as easily say he's just making fun of any number of groups who play up talking like that, like rappers (some of whom you'll note are white).

    --
    There are lives at stake here!
  21. I used to be a winamp junkie by myc · · Score: 3, Informative

    winamp used to rock. Then for some unfathomable reason someone decided that winamp needed a built-in webbrowser. A WEB BROWSER FOR CHRIST'S SAKE! As soon as I learned about foobar2000 I ditched winamp for good. foobar2000 is also Unicode compliant; winamp won't do unicode without really ugly kludges. That makes foobar2000 perfect for mp3 files with east asian language file names/ID3 tags.

    --
    NO CARRIER
  22. OT:Reasons I like Lists by jtev · · Score: 3, Informative
    What you've just done is a perfect example of why we have ordered lists. For example if I wanted to state why I like ordered lists I could type:
    <ol>
    <li>because HTML doens't render linebreaks
    <li>because I'm to damned lazy to keep track of the numbers in my list
    <li>because it makes me look super 1337 even though it's so simple
    </ol>
    and that would look like this:
    1. because HTML doens't render linebreaks
    2. because I'm to damned lazy to keep track of the numbers in my list
    3. because it makes me look super 1337 even though it's so simple
    Remember, it's spiffier when you use it!
    --
    That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
  23. Re:Winamp sucks by whiteranger99x · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why would you want to use something that's named "F***ed Up Beyond Repair 2000"?

    I dunno, but apparently that doesn't stop people from using Windows!! :P HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR!!!! *ducks and hides now*

    --
    Join the TWIT army now!
  24. Spelling is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's official; Netcraft confirms: Spelling is dying

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Spelling Nazi community when IDC confirmed that proper spelling market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all Web users. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that proper spelling has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. Proper spelling is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive writing test.

    You don't don't need to be a Kreskin to predict the future of proper spelling. The misspelled hand writing is on the wall: Spelling faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for spelling because spell-checking is dying. Things are looking very bad for the Spelling Nazis. As many of us are already aware, spelling continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.

    Microsoft Word spell checker is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time Word developers Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: Spell checking in Microsoft Word is dying.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    Oxford English Dictionary publishers Oxford University state that there are 7000 users of the OED. How many users of Merriam-Webster are there? Let's see. The number of OED versus Merriam-Webster posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 Merriam-Webster users. Wiktionary posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of Merriam-Webster posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of the Wiktionary. A recent article put Microsoft Word Spell Checker at about 80 percent of the electronic dictionary market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 Word spell-check users. This is consistent with the number of poorly-spelled Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles of Microsoft, abysmal sales and so on, Word went out of business and was taken over by Microsoft Office who sell another troubled spell-checker. Now Microsoft Office is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that proper spelling has steadily declined in market share. Spelling is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If spelling is to survive at all it will be among linguist dilettante dabblers. Spelling continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, spelling is dead.

    Fact: Spelling is dying

  25. Re:Could someone please tell me... by Artifakt · · Score: 3, Informative

    Winamp 5 can just be set to search for the latest version, or it can be checking for info on the music you are playing.

    If it's checking for updates, try this:
    1. Rightclick some blank area of the skin.
    2. Click "options" on the resulting menu, then click "preferences".
    3, On the "winamp preferences" window that results, go to "general preferences". Find the checkbox labeled, "Check for new versions of winamp at startup" and uncheck it.
    Also, the "jump to file" subsection under "general preferences" may have another box that says "check for new version when winamp starts" Just in case, you may want to see if you need to uncheck this one too.

    If winamp seems to be getting information on the current file, even when you don't have the media library open, go to that same window, and where it reads "Select your internet connection type", try telling it the computer is "not connected to the internet".

    --
    Who is John Cabal?
  26. Re:foobar2000 by mkeroppi · · Score: 3, Informative

    To the casual listener probably not, Winamp is still much "sleeker" graphically. Of course music player should be more about the sound (Tell that to cell phone companies). That's where foobar comes in, although its not open source, you basically know how the entire "signal path" goes from the music file out to whereever you go. You can't really say the same thing for any other players (well you can tell, but it's much more difficult). For example, bet you didn't know most mp3 *clips*, it's just how mp3s encoding do (some samples will go beyond the range of the bitstream "wav" output, thus clip). Foobar lets user deal with the (hard) clipping, either through limiter (soft clips) or something like Replaygain. Another thing is the common sample rate conversion (44.1k->48k) problem with bad resamplers from AC97 soundcards (AC97 does everything is 48k, most music [CDs] are 44.1k), custom SRC was one of the first things in foobar. They also got things like kernel streaming (as oppose to DirectSound) if your a stickler on bitwise perfect output. Of course now it's grown into so much more. Most of these stuff most users won't care, or won't know enough to care, but the point is, foobar lets you control the signal path. Any critical listener would tell you the cleanest signal path is the best you can hope for, unless your equipment has known flaws which need major fixups. Check out hydrogenaudio's forum it's hosted on, these guys are major hardcore audio geeks (the "technical, scientific audiophiles").

  27. Winamp will never replace... by Ingolfke · · Score: 3, Funny

    emacs as my OS of choice.