Slashdot Mirror


Blogging Sweeps China

An anonymous reader writes "Dissident astro-physicist, Xiao Qiang, director of the China Internet Project at UC Berkeley, interviews Isaac Mao, founder of CNBlog for New Scientist. Asked what is his strategy to expand blogging under China's censorship regime, Mao's response is typically Taoist: 'What is our strategy? We do not have a strategy. But the information flow in the blogosphere has its own Way. The Way is our strategy: personal, fast, connected and networked.'"

122 comments

  1. Garbage no in, but garbage out by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    China is one of those funny places where they really crack down on the incoming news. Taking a look at some of their latest news, it's hard to reconcile the rosy glow that they have in regards to their country with the actual happenings of their military overseas (submarine in Japanese waters) and communist neighbors (not a word about the imminent overthrow of Kim Jong Illmatic).

    On the other hand, unlike many Western countries *cough cough* that send the secret police to "visit" people who wish to express an unpopular opinion, China allows its dissidents a full voice. They of course drown out the voices with their own party-led voices proclaiming the benefits of the Komintang. But as far as stifling free speech, China has one of the best records in that area.

    1. Re:Garbage no in, but garbage out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      news.google.com went dark last week.

    2. Re:Garbage no in, but garbage out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Taking a look at some of their latest news, it's hard to reconcile the rosy glow that they have in regards to their country with the actual happenings of their military overseas

      Yes, people in the United States would NEVER be fed a totally unrealistic and rosy view of what their military is doing overseas!

    3. Re:Garbage no in, but garbage out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think you're getting it mixed up

      Komintang = Taiwan

      Communists (if you can still call them that) = China = Gong Zharn Dong (rough translation)

    4. Re:Garbage no in, but garbage out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liberating, damnit! :)

    5. Re:Garbage no in, but garbage out by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Those pictures from Abu Ghraib weren't rosy. NBC's footage of a marine point-blank executing a wounded, unarmed Iraqi weren't rosy.

      It's hard to know how much of the full picture we are getting, but honestly, yes, I think we're getting more than most people in other times and other places.

    6. Re:Garbage no in, but garbage out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You haven't been to Europe, have you? The difference in coverage is drastic.

      You don't see any Americans killed or wounded (the latter only after they're safe, cleaned up and "wanting to go back there, sir" even without their legs).

      You don't see many Iraqis killed or wounded, save the occasional wounded child from an insurgent bomb.

      Usually either of these happens only if the story is 'big' like the one time a helicopter fired on civilians and got on tape (or the torture). Those films, too, are edited.

    7. Re:Garbage no in, but garbage out by king-manic · · Score: 1

      From several first hand accounts, the media rarly gets any of the details right even in local news stories. They simply sensationalize the few facts they have to make it seem like they know. I'm sure anyone who has had a friend/family member in the news will understands how wrong the stories are. Journalists are Attention whore arts majors.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    8. Re:Garbage no in, but garbage out by dwm · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, unlike many Western countries *cough cough* that send the secret police to "visit" people who wish to express an unpopular opinion,...

      Er, examples?

      I'm not calling BS, but it would be nice to know if you've got examples of "many" Western countries sending "secret police" to "visit" those who only "wish" to express unpopular opinions.

    9. Re:Garbage no in, but garbage out by nyekulturniy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are those of us who have military training who have an idea what's going on over there. The combat is messy, but having taken Fallujah in street fighting, the Coalition has denied the insurgents a major base city.

      One thing I've noticed that is significant: al-Jazeera has quieted down. They aren't able to get the communiques from the insurgents as well as they did in the past.

      Overall, it looks as if the fighting is going well for the Coalition, and the Tet offensive of THIS war was done BY the Marines, not TO the Marines.

      --
      Nyekulturniy... Proudly confusing readers and editors since 1981!
    10. Re:Garbage no in, but garbage out by hunterx11 · · Score: 1
      They of course drown out the voices with their own party-led voices proclaiming the benefits of the Komintang .

      You're thinking of China(1), not China(2).

      1. China, Republic of
      2. China, People's Republic of

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    11. Re:Garbage no in, but garbage out by burns210 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You have to be fucking kidding. Unless you ARE the chinese government-run news agency(who must have recently recruited the Iraqi Information Minister), you have been living under a rock for a couple decades...

      Free speech? Bullshit. It isn't even that they have transparent censorship. They have downright oppression. Everyone breathing should know this by now.

      Isn't this the same government that ran over students protesting with a tank. A TANK.

      America has, in my opinion, a rediculously poor record for our free speech record. But even the 60's protest issues don't hold a candle to the crap Chinese dissidents and citizens have to deal with.

      If that was a joke, you failed miserably.

    12. Re:Garbage no in, but garbage out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is pretty uncultured to ignore the dead civilians.

  2. Blogs by Claire-plus-plus · · Score: 4, Funny

    The sound of one hand blogging

    --
    99 bottles of beer in 175 characte
    1. Re:Blogs by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      isn't the appropriate response to thrust your hand forwards, thereby breaking the blogger's nose?

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  3. Reminds me.. by modifried · · Score: 5, Funny

    .. of a Douglas Adams quote:

    He believed in a door. He must find that door. The door was the way to... to...
    The Door was The Way.
    Good.
    Capital letters were always the best way of dealing with things you didn't have a good answer to.

  4. Pajamahadeen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But are the bloggers as accurate and trustworthy as the mainstream media?

    1. Re:Pajamahadeen by geeksgirl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Shouldn't you be asking if mainstream media is accurate and trustworthy, assuming you're being sincere and not sarcastic of course?.

      To answer your sincere question then, bloggers as a whole may not be accurate and trustworthy - can you really trust someone you barely know, except through the thoughts they choose to post online?

      However, Bloggers do tell you about their lives, as they live it, about the things that happen in their country and how it affects them. So while blogs may lack decent grammar and spelling, it is at least, to me, a more realistic view of the average person's situation. (Note: this does not apply to the ravings of bored teenage girls with smiley addictions! - of which there are way too many in the blogosphere)

      --
      "I'm going to worry like hell and that's not an easy job, believe me" - Lu-Tze "Thief of Time"
  5. What the hell? by downbad · · Score: 3, Insightful
    What is our strategy? We do not have a strategy.
    ...
    The Way is our strategy: personal, fast, connected and networked.
    Right.
    1. Re:What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey don't criticize! if yu do, you must be anti-freedom, think of the children!

    2. Re:What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put down the C++ manual and try learning about some different cultures and philosophies, genius.

    3. Re:What the hell? by aussie_a · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I have. I've learnt structured (functional? traditional? It seems to change from teacher to teacher) programming as well as object oriented.

  6. Re:Too bad I firewalled the entire country... by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 2

    More spam comes from the US than from China or South Korea. It just happens that there are more servers that allow spam in China.

    So how would you like to write an apology to 1billion+ people? Perhaps a mass email?

  7. Sounds by fozzmeister · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sounds like an IBM ad!

  8. Excellent... by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 4, Funny

    Tomorrows news.

    China blocks all blog sites.

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:Excellent... by SPBesui · · Score: 1

      RTFA. It was yesterday's news.

  9. Re:Too bad I firewalled the entire country... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It just happens that there are more servers that allow spam in China.

    s/servers/Windows zombies/

  10. Astounding by nagora · · Score: 4, Funny
    China's bloggers look like they may actually be even more pretentious and boring than their western counterparts. I didn't think it possible.

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    1. Re:Astounding by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that Tao quote is as pretentious as it gets. Of course there are plans and strategies, but speaking like a character out of an RPG game makes for much better media soundbites.

    2. Re:Astounding by burns210 · · Score: 1

      Hey, now. Give us a chance. This whole interweb is still catching on in some of our best parts like the deep south and the plain states. Couple more months, and we'll show YOU who is the most arrogant, pretentious, ill-informed isolationists on the planet. We can do better, we PROMISE. Maybe more websites about our pet cats?

      Sincerererely,
      America's Web Commubity

    3. Re:Astounding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I've talked to Isaac. He's the pretentious one. Blogging is good for china. Isaac is riding the wave for his own ego boost.

  11. Re:Too bad I firewalled the entire country... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong, there was more spam hitting our servers from APNIC blocks and since we don't have dealings with that region...

  12. *Cough* bullshit *cough* by cartzworth · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The Way is our strategy: personal, fast, connected and networked.'"

    I think they forgot "...and censored, too."

  13. Sex by Claire-plus-plus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is interesting that once again sex became the big reason many people have jumped on to a new technology. As that article said, blogging got a big boost from a sex blog, the sex increased visibility for the blog server and introduced many new users to blogging. It just seems to be a pity to me that people can't find something better than sex to get people to assert their collective voice.

    --
    99 bottles of beer in 175 characte
    1. Re:Sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why?

      Sex is THE fundamental drive of all life on earth. Why would it surprise you to find it at the top of most human agendas?

    2. Re:Sex by SPBesui · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've heard that Godiva Chocolate is better than sex. Maybe you could try that.

    3. Re:Sex by bagel2ooo · · Score: 1

      While I also wish there were more intellectual pursuits that brought people together in this manner, I think that it's more a means. The manner they are gratifying their carnal desires seem to at least not be destructive and hopefully once they are taking part in this communication medium, they will be able to pursue avenues of deeper thought. :)

      --
      ( o ) one could say I'm rather baked
    4. Re:Sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, if that doesn't work, you can always go with blue-berry-topped pancakes.

    5. Re:Sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is the anti-sex

    6. Re:Sex by pgilman · · Score: 1

      "It just seems to be a pity to me that people can't find something better than sex to get people to assert their collective voice."

      uh... better than sex? *scratches head*

      --
      if i'm a grammar nazi, you're an illiteracy nazi.
  14. Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering that our only real drive while alive is to procreate, what would be "better than sex"?

    Despite the cries of the so-called "intelligentsia", sex is still the prime incentive of ALL human interaction. Whether it be indirect challenging of hierarchy or straightforward appeals to the opposite gender, sex is the real reason behind any action.

    1. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      sex is the real reason behind any action
      So very true...
      • I got up this morning and took a shit SEX!
      • Took the dog out SEX!
      • Made blueberry muffins SEX!
      • Checked my email V1AGRA!
      • Updated some DNS zones SEX!
      • Had a coffee SEX!
      • Brush teeth SEX!
      • Check forum I moderate SEX!
      • Spend rest of day idling on IRC and browsing /. SEX!
    2. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Haha. but seriously...

      I got up this morning and took a shit so that I could survive until the next time I had sex.

      I took the dog out because owning another creature raises the possibility of having sex with another interested human.

      I made blueberry muffins because eating is fundamental to survival, and attracting the opposite sex with a special skill like cooking is important to having sex.

      I checked my email in order to 1) answer emails from friends who may introduce me to future sex partners, and 2) make money which increases the chances that I have sex.

      I updates some DNS zones because it increases the possibility of having sex with women who may understand what that is.

      I had coffee because I like coffee and what I like is reflected in my outlook of the day, and if I look happy and content my possibility to havce sex increases.

      I brushed my teeth because it increases my chances of having sex.

      I checked the forum that I moderate because there might be a female posting which I can attract with moderation points. I may also be able to increase my sexual attractiveness by making myself more well-rounded.

      I spent the day idling on IRC and browsing because there might be a chance that a female may log onto IRC, and there is always the possibility of rubbing one out to some internet porn (not quite sex, but a reasonable approximation).

      Yes. All about sex.

    3. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Having pursued two relationships with vigo(u)r and passion, and been betrayed both times, I reviewed my priorities and decided that there were many more fulfilling things than appealing to base desires. I've never been interested in "sex without love" (I'm male, so that might sound weird, but I'm not particularly masculine either (no trolls, that doesn't mean I'm gay)), and having decided upon goals other than partnerships, an inevitable result is that I have decided to remain celibate for the remainder of my life.

      Would you like to rationalise my existence in this light? Or am I a figment of my imagination?

    4. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      I got up this morning and took a shit so that I could survive until the next time I had sex.

      Rubbish, I took a shit because bowell problems are painful.

      I took the dog out because owning another creature raises the possibility of having sex with another interested human.

      Some people hate animals!

      I made blueberry muffins because eating is fundamental to survival, and attracting the opposite sex with a special skill like cooking is important to having sex.

      What garbage. I made muffin because I like it, generally I don't cook.

      I checked my email in order to 1) answer emails from friends who may introduce me to future sex partners, and 2) make money which increases the chances that I have sex.

      because, faceless automation and system log files are a great way of meeting new sexual partners?

      I updates some DNS zones because it increases the possibility of having sex with women who may understand what that is.

      I don't think so

      I had coffee because I like coffee and what I like is reflected in my outlook of the day, and if I look happy and content my possibility to havce sex increases.

      Wrong, I drink coffee beause I'm heavily addicted to caffine. Shaking, twitching and having foul coffee breath doesn't increase the possibility of me having sex at all.

      I brushed my teeth because it increases my chances of having sex.

      I brush my teeth because tooth decay is painful

      I checked the forum that I moderate because there might be a female posting which I can attract with moderation points. I may also be able to increase my sexual attractiveness by making myself more well-rounded.

      No, I checked the forum, hosted on my server, because it's me that gets to deal with the legal threats and complaints if I don't.

      I spent the day idling on IRC and browsing because there might be a chance that a female may log onto IRC, and there is always the possibility of rubbing one out to some internet porn (not quite sex, but a reasonable approximation).

      Why the fuck would I be looking for sexual partners on IRC where it's impossible to determine gender?

      Yes. All about sex.

      No it isn't.

    5. Re:Um... by The+Snowman · · Score: 1
      sex is the real reason behind any action

      So very true...

      • I got up this morning and took a shit SEX!
      • Took the dog out SEX!
      • Made blueberry muffins SEX!
      • Checked my email V1AGRA!
      • Updated some DNS zones SEX!
      • Had a coffee SEX!
      • Brush teeth SEX!
      • Check forum I moderate SEX!
      • Spend rest of day idling on IRC and browsing /. SEX!

      I think most things can be linked to sex, but maybe not directly. How about my schedule this morning:

      • Woke up: have to be awake to procreate, because I am male.
      • Brushed teeth: my wife hates kissing me when I have yucky teeth.
      • Cooked breakfast: I have to survive until the next time we have sex.
      • Reading Slashdot: because my wife is 600 miles away visiting family.

      Anyway, there are a three things we need to survive: food, shelter, clothing. Food so we don't starve, shelter and clothing so we don't get sick and die from the weather. We survive to procreate. So yes, stuff like making muffins and drinking coffee mean food to survive so you can have sex eventually.

      I think the root issue here is not only that we need to have sex to keep the species alive, but sex is fun (as long as the other person is hot). We have sex and sexual innuendos in TV shows, movies, newspaper ads, interpersonal communicates (e.g. jokes around the office), the bedroom, everywhere. Why? It is one of our primal instincts, and we like it.

      I am not surprised that sex would start something in China, be it a revolution or just blogging, because they are so repressed there. I am still skeptical of this story and several of the posts here, but the general idea seems natural to me.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    6. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I checked the forum that I moderate because there might be a female posting which I can attract with moderation points.

      You really sound like a chick magnet.

    7. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I took the dog out because owning another creature raises the possibility of having sex with another interested human.

      I took the dog out because owning another creature raises the possibility of having sex with another creature.

    8. Re:Um... by Sinner · · Score: 1
      I think I see a new Slashdot meme brewing...

      1. Take a shit
      2. ...
      3. SEX!

      Or maybe not.

      --
      fish and pipes
    9. Re:Um... by Sinner · · Score: 1
      sex is the real reason behind any action.
      I'm guessing you don't have a girlfriend.
      --
      fish and pipes
  15. Oh, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    You say: China allows its dissidents a full voice.

    http://www.asianews.it/view.php?l=en&art=1964

    Tiananmen dissident tortured to the point of becoming psychotic. He splattered paint on Mao Zedong's portrait.

    Beijing (AsiaNews/SCMP) - An imprisoned Chinese dissident has become psychotic as a result of the torture inflicted upon him, one of the man's friend told Free Asia after fleeing China.

    Yu Dongyue is a former newspaper editor who was arrested during the Tiananmen protests and sentenced to life for "counter-revolutionary propaganda": he had defaced Mao's portrait by splattering it with paint.

    In 2001 Lu Decheng, another dissident, who was jailed for years but released early, saw Yu in Hunan No1 Prison. "He was almost unrecognisable," Mr Lu said who recently escaped the mainland in a perilous three-month journey. "He had a totally dull look in his eyes, and he kept repeating words over and over again as if he were chanting a mantra. He didn't recognise anyone."

    "There was a big scar on the right side of his head. I asked his mother if Yu had ever received a head injury, but she said he never had."

    Mr Lu said that another inmate at the prison told him that Yu had been tied to a power pole and left in the sun for several days.

    "After that, they locked him in solitary confinement for two years and that's when he got like that," Mr Lu stressed. "He has been tortured to the point of psychosis."

    Officials at the Hunan No1 Prison were not available for comment.

    Yu Dongyue, Lu Decheng and Yu Zhijian were school friends from Hunan province and had been active in the pro-democracy movement before travelling to Beijing in May 1989 to join thousands of demonstrators on Tiananmen Square.

    As a result of his involvement, Mr Lu said, his house was demolished, his wife threatened to the point that the authorities forced her to divorce him, and his minibus confiscated, depriving him of the means to earn a living.

    Phone tapping, mail interception and surveillance became a regular part of his life, he added.

    Speaking from an undisclosed location, he said he fled so that he could tell Yu's story. He did not reveal any details about his escape.

    1. Re:Oh, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "He had a totally dull look in his eyes, and he kept repeating words over and over again as if he were chanting a mantra. He didn't recognise anyone."

      Sounds like the average Falun Gong practitioner.

    2. Re:Oh, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds more like he was lobotomized than tortured.

    3. Re:Oh, really? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Your subject is written as if you disagree with the grandparent post, but the actual post agrees.

  16. Where are the Iraqi blogs by aggles · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Good for the Chinese. Courage to communicate in spite of government's attitude is a positive sign from a country coming out of the dark ages. Now, how about some Iraqi blogs? For all the funds being pumped in there, one would think the Iraqis would have something to say. I'm tired of hearing everything about what is really happening there, third hand. Just so they use a language that can be translated by services such as http://www.worldlingo.com/

    1. Re:Where are the Iraqi blogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm .. a low end computer is about 2 years salary of an iraqi.

      That means to acquire a computer, for two years, the average iraqi must not spend his money on essentials such as food, toilet paper, and AK-47s.

      So maybe in 2 years we'll start seeing the first real iraqi blogs.

      That said, the elitists probably have computers now. But who wants to know what the elitists say?

    2. Re:Where are the Iraqi blogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Regarding the Iraqis, I think they're a little too busy keeping themselves from dying of starvation, thirst and heatstroke (You do know that their electrical system still isn't stable?)

      Once the citizen's life in Iraq becomes relatively stable, and they are able to find jobs, and they can get their kids back in school again, I'm sure there will be some people who will blog. But right now, the place is a veritable hellhole, and we're not going to be seeing anything on the web anytime soon.

      BTW There was a film directly from the populous, Voices of Iraq. Apparently pretty graphic and biased, it is still a good documentary of what Iraq is like right now.

    3. Re:Where are the Iraqi blogs by G-Man · · Score: 4, Informative

      How about just Googling 'Iraqi blogs'? Too general for you? Try 'Healing Iraq', 'Iraq the Model', 'Riverbend', 'Salam Pax'.

      No, I'm not giving you the URLs. Do at least a little work. Sheesh. These people have been blogging for over a year and a half - Salam Pax was blogging when Saddam was still in power. Sorry if I come across as caustic, but your question and the response by the ACs above show that people haven't made the merest attempt to find out for themselves. Anyone who really cared could find Iraqi blogs over a year ago.

    4. Re:Where are the Iraqi blogs by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Informative
      Don't blame him; there's just not enough information about these blogs in mainstream media sources -- and in spite of how long the internet has been available, most of us still get most of our information from mainstream sources. I was at a panel about blogging and the war on terrorism at an academic conference and there was one panelist writing about the "dear_raed" blog. He had interesting things to say about it, but he basically seemed to think that Pax was the only Iraqi blogger and that he stopped in 2003. He had never heard of raedinthemiddle, afamilyinbaghdad, healing iraq, or even riverbend. He didn't know there were Iranian blogs either. I was stunned.

      Of course, you're right, a simple google search will uncover many of them.

    5. Re:Where are the Iraqi blogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:Where are the Iraqi blogs by ErikZ · · Score: 1


      You think?

      You mean...you're not sure? This is the freaking information age. Go find out already.

      As for Iraqi blogs. Did you try typing "Iraqi blogs" into google yet?

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  17. Great by BabyJaysus · · Score: 0

    Just what the Internet needs, another 1.3 billion bloggers letting us be privy to their inane thoughts.

  18. chinese blogging.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is our strategy? We do not have a strategy.

    Erm.. Yeah, because doing something without a plan is the best way of going about things.

    1) No idea how to approach your goal
    2) Create problems rather than solving them
    3) ???
    4) Profit!

    At least we know if he decides to open up shop in America, he will be gainfully employed.

  19. Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your situation is only limited by your own interpretation of the events that you've experienced. You had bad experiences which turned you off to relationships with women. Since, as you claim, you are not gay, this limits you to celibacy.

    The problem only lies in your inability to accurately predict the future. Your current outlook presumes that you are through with sex. Unless you are hideously deformed or incredibly old, this is a bad bet. Your current attitude is temporary like most any decision we make is. At some point you will realize that sex without love is one of the greatest gifts to mankind and gladly take part in it again.

    That will open the door to the possibility of impregnation and the spreading of your genetic material. And we arrive at the place where my original post left off again.

    Just because you think you are "through" with women doesn't mean that Nature is done with you.

    1. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your current outlook presumes that you are through with sex. Unless you are hideously deformed or incredibly old
      (I am the OP.) This is a red herring. I never claimed, "I will never be able to get sex again", whether true or not, nor would I even agree that for the woman physical appearance stands high on the list of factors when choosing a partner.
      At some point you will realize that sex without love is one of the greatest gifts to mankind and gladly take part in it again.
      I've never taken part in "sex without love". I've never wanted to. And while I'm not so stubborn as to believe that all my most deeply held feelings will remain with me throughout my life, it takes more than "you will realize that..." to sway me.
      possibility of impregnation and the spreading of your genetic material
      I've always been vehemently opposed to my procreating - before I even lost my virginity, at 15 or so. I could write long, boring essays on the philosophies that led me to this, but suffice is to say that it has never stopped me enoying my life.

      As I studied my motivations more carefully, I learnt that sex without the intention to procreate is no different to eating a hearty meal when one is already overweight - perhaps enjoyable, but certainly unnecessary, costly, and perfectly resistable.

  20. Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    shouldn't that be "brogging"?

  21. Re:Falun Gong by mordors9 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    it's about protecting citizens from illegal scams.
    So Tianneman Square was just about protecting Chinese from spammers and scammers? Alrighty then.
  22. Asexuality according to wikipedia: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asexuality is a designation or self-designation for people who lack sexual attraction. There is debate as to whether this is a sexual dysfunction or an actual sexual orientation. The term is also sometimes used as a gender identity by those who perceive their lack of sexual attraction places them outside the standard definitions of gender. There has been little research done on asexuality, but those studies that have been conducted suggest that, if it is a sexual orientation, it is the least commonly occurring one.

    There is disagreement over whether or not asexuality is a legitimate sexual orientation. Some argue that it falls under the heading of hypoactive sexual disorder or sexual aversion disorder. Among those who do not believe it to be an orientation, suggested causes include past sexual abuse, sexual repression (of homosexuality or otherwise), hormonal problems, delayed development of attraction, and not having met the right person. Many self-identified asexuals, meanwhile, say that these things are not true of them, or that because their asexuality does not cause them distress, it should not be labeled a disorder. Others argue that, in the past, similar things were said about homosexuality, despite the fact that many people now consider it a legitimate orientation.

    Because of the lack of research on the subject, there is little evidence in favor of either side of the debate.

    A study done on rams found that about 2% to 3% of the individuals being studied had no apparent interest in mating with either sex. Another study was done on rats and gerbils, in which up to 12% of the males showed no interest in females. Their interactions with other males were not measured, however, so the study is of limited use when it comes to asexuality.

    A UK survey of sexuality included a question on sexual attraction, and 1% of respondents replied that they had "never felt sexually attracted to anyone at all." The Kinsey Institute conducted a small survey on the topic, which concluded that "asexuals appear to be better characterized by low sexual desire and sexual excitation than by low levels of sexual behavior or high sexual inhibition." That study also mentions a conflict regarding the definition of "asexual": the researchers found four different definitions in the literature, and stated that it was unclear whether those identifying as asexual were referring to an actual orientation.

    There are differences among people that identify as asexual, chief among them the presence or absence of a sex drive and romantic attraction. Among asexuals, some only experience one or the other, while some possess both, and others neither.

    The sex drive of those asexuals who have one is not directed at anything: it is only an urge for sexual stimulation or release. It can range from weak to strong. Some asexuals experience sexual feelings but have no desire to act on them.

    For those asexuals with romantic attraction, it is often directed specifically towards one or more genders. These asexuals desire romantic relationships (ranging from casual liaisons to marriage) with their preferred gender or genders, but often do not want these relationships to include sexual activity. Because of their romantic orientation, some asexuals describe themselves as gay, bisexual, or straight asexuals; this is related to the concept of affectional orientation.

    Those who do want romantic relationships are in a difficult position, as the majority of people are not asexual. Asexuals able to tolerate sex can pair up with non-asexuals, but even then their lack of attraction can be psychologically distressing to their partner, making a long-term romance difficult. Asexuals who cannot tolerate sex must either compromise with their partners and have a certain amount anyway, have sexless relationships with those few who are willing, only date other asexuals, or decide to stay single.

    Some asexuals use a classification system developed (and then retired) by the founder of the Asexual Visibility and Education

    1. Re:Asexuality according to wikipedia: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wouldn't really describe myself as asexual in the sense clinically defined here. I can find someone sexually attractive in the same way that I enjoy the smell of roasting meat - but it doesn't lead me to pursue, or even want to pursue, sex with that person, any more than I suddenly want to start eating meat (as a vege) because I happen to like the smell.

      I recognise my base urges but my higher (in the sense of "learned/controlled" rather than "better"; I make no judgement here) reasoning always seems to dominate without causing me bother. I can certainly relate to asexuals being adamant that they have no disorder.

      I think the wikipedia article needs to differentiate between sexuality in males and females. For the female, especially (and not only in homo sapiens), it's not just about "how many times I can be impregnated" but "what about the quality of our combined genes?" and "will my partner provide protection?" What causes sexual attraction is then far more convoluted - and while for men, it's considered "unusual" to only want sex as part of a wider protocol in the relationship, in women it's almost exclusively so (that's why you have desperate geeks crying out for sex and few women who just open their legs and welcome you in).

    2. Re:Asexuality according to wikipedia: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that most of those geeks are actualy crying out for a relationship, at least that's the case with me.

    3. Re:Asexuality according to wikipedia: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Make time for and friendships with women, then. It doesn't matter if they're single, married, older, younger (not too young :-), childless, or mother hen to a family of 20. I have found it a lot more interesting for me, as a male, to hang out with women - primarily because (1) social instincts mean they're not competing with me, and (2) because I never present to them the things which might make me an attractive mate (I'm *not* an attractive mate, so that's not hard to do :-), they're certainly not competing for me either.

      You experience the character of the opposite sex, and many of the characteristics of a traditional relationship might develop with some of these people - women are more tactile (hugs etc.), you can have open conversation without worrying about seeming "too sensitive", you get a new perspective on solving problems, etc. It is said that from a woman to a man, "Let's just be good friends," is an insult, but from a man to a woman, it's the best compliment.

      What are you missing? Snuggling up, cuddling, and sex. Which brings us right back to the original topic, and is to be avoided anyway ;-).

  23. Re:Falun Gong by Avial · · Score: 1

    What you never heard on the news at any point is that these people who practice Falun Gong/Dafa were primarily peasants and farmers in the country side. These people became so enamored with it that they made their kids do it too, and then everyone became so enamored with the promise of Falun Gong that the kids stopped going to school. Now whats better for poor peasant kids? Hoping to find a spinning wheel in your stomach so you can ascend to heaven, or going to school to learn some skills so they can join the world economy? You decide. This wasn't happening to people in the big cities. It was happening to poor peasants who have little to hope for, and for them, Falun Gong is a cult just like the Branch Davidians, Heaven's Gate, etc. While peasants aren't stupid necessarily, they don't realize the value of education in the same way that people in western/modern cities/nations do. These idiotic Falun Gong cultists find solace in the western idea of ideological freedom, because it's the easy way to cover up their true beliefs. I have no problem with people wanting to perform exercises to maintain health of mind and body - I do have problems when people want to start a cult with little kids in it.

    --
    help a poor college grad get a free Mac Mini
  24. The Tao of business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    I wish I could get away with that philosophy in business ...

    Venture Capitalists: So, tell us, why should we give you seed money? What's your detailed corporate strategy?
    Me: We don't have a strategy. The company has its own Way. The Way is our strategy.
    Venture Capitalists: Well, fair enough. Sounds good to us! Here's $300 million.

    Somehow I'm a little skeptical of the "meh, it'll all work out by itself in the end" style of planning ...
    1. Re:The Tao of business by rhakka · · Score: 1

      because you haven't been raised to see that when you do not put your own expectations on things, and just do them, you see the best ways to do things easier. Their strategy is to do and adapt to what is instead of planning for what they expect and having it fall to shit when things happen they didn't expect, like you often see in day to day life here in the West.

      There are ups and downs to both approaches. But they do both work, in their way.

    2. Re:The Tao of business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'd like to see what would have happened if they tried that during the Apollo program. Give me a break. Making plans doesn't mean being inflexibly wedded to them when things change.

    3. Re:The Tao of business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, you think that planning is somehow a Western idea? Tell that to, say, Yi Kai Jan as he was designing the fortress of Jiayuguan. Do you have any idea of the meticulous planning that was required to build the fortifications of the Great Wall? Yeah, plans screw up sometimes, but they're better than just slapping things together haphazardly with no eye to the future.

    4. Re:The Tao of business by rhakka · · Score: 1

      Wow, you picked up that there are pluses and minuses, just like I said, congratulations genius.

      sometimes you have to sit down and plan things out. sometimes you don't. If you're just trying to connect people or start a "scene", you may not have to make as many plans as you might have to in order to launch tons of metal and explosive fuel into space, no?

      Sometimes the very act of planning limits your ability to react. When was the last time you got mad at someone who didn't deserve it? Those are the times that your expectations blind you to the reality of the situation you are in. Go ahead, tell me you've never done that.

      Anyway, Taoism isn't about complete inaction. It's about pure action that flows without relying entirely on concious, logical thought. And it can be quite powerful. Not when you have to plan a huge undertaking on a timeframe, but for simpler things, in which a particular timeframe is not required, you are free to make mistakes and explore to arrive at the best solution. Taoism simply says that most things can be done in such a manner. You could probably say it's more about not being in a rush (and thus not having the pressure) then it is about not doing anything.

    5. Re:The Tao of business by rhakka · · Score: 1

      Like there is nothing in between?

      Don't bother getting anecdotal. We could sit here for a lifetime tossing out counter examples.

      Planning is better than slapping things together, if you have to do something now, or by next monday. If you have all the time you need to do something, you can dispense with pressure and rigid thinking and simply explore your subject calmly, peacefully, and powerfully.

      If you don't know what I'm talking about, then fine, it may not make sense to you.

    6. Re:The Tao of business by version5 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Art of War was huge in 80s on Wall Street for business and investment strategy.

      Somehow I'm a little skeptical of the "meh, it'll all work out by itself in the end" style of planning ...

      That's what happens when you make straw men. One of the metaphors that is used in the book to describe the method is "rolling a boulder down a hill." What this means is employing a minimum of effort by making use of the natural features of your environment. Designing strategies that ignore or flaunt those features is destined to fail. Another metaphor is floating down a river in a boat. The Way of the river is to go downstream, so your strategy should be to follow the river, letting it do most of the work, while you provide small adjustments and navigation. Getting in a boat in a fast moving current and trying to paddle upstream is extremely difficult and unlikely to succeed. An unwise strategist sees this as an obstacle, so he proceeds to build a bigger boat and add more rowers, which usually leads to even more problems: added weight, risk of running aground, etc. But still, the unwise blame the river when they themselves are the obstacle.

      In the context of your venture capital example, the market has its own Way. If your business strategy carefully aligns itself with the natural market forces and uses them to advantage, you will likely suceed. If you proceed in ignorance of the market, you will fail.

      Likewise, Isaac Mao's strategy is to make use of the natural (viral, memetic) Way that blogs catch on and expand.

      --

      "It's Dot Com!"

    7. Re:The Tao of business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I've read the Art of War. Slinging around vague analogies to rivers does not a convincing argument make. (Let's throw in a few buzzwords too, like "viral" amd "memetic".) You're the one constructing strawmen here. Nobody said anything about "proceeding in ignorance of the market". Understanding the market, and adapting to it, is the whole basis of a smart business plan. That doesn't obviate the need for having a plan. Why is it that everyone seems to equate carefully planning ahead with idiotically trying to force the environment to conform to your will? That's the exact opposite of what a good plan is -- something that provides goal, direction, the means to estimate and accomodate future needs, without sacrificing flexibility or the ability to adapt to the unknown future.

    8. Re:The Tao of business by version5 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've read the Art of War. Slinging around vague analogies to rivers does not a convincing argument make.

      They aren't really my analogies, but I apologize that they aren't convincing to you. But may I add that your disdainful dismissal of my comments is made evident by your yawning? I find this inappropriate for reasoned discussion.

      Understanding the market, and adapting to it, is the whole basis of a smart business plan.

      But now, you seem to be agreeing with me.

      Nobody said anything about "proceeding in ignorance of the market".

      I wasn't intending to quote you, only to illuminate the Taoist way by illustrating common mistakes that are made when it is ignored.

      That doesn't obviate the need for having a plan.

      The original poster (was it you, AC?) supposed that Mao's plan meant no plan. I corrected this notion, and once again, we are in agreement.

      Why is it that everyone seems to equate carefully planning ahead with idiotically trying to force the environment to conform to your will? That's the exact opposite of what a good plan is.

      Yet another point of agreement! From my experience, many people believe that planning ahead does mean bringing the world under control. Certain people cannot find peace until their environment is meticulously arranged to head-off any possible unplanned eventuality. A moment's introspection will often reveal this tendency more than you care to admit. Other people fool themselves into thinking that they are filled with the power to control the world. Both of these are common, foolhardy mistakes, yet often believed to be "planning ahead."

      Your description of good planning seems completely harmonious with mine, so I must assume that you are a Taoist!

      --

      "It's Dot Com!"

  25. Great! by JanneM · · Score: 2, Funny

    Blogging Sweeps China

    Great that those bloggers are lending a hand! With the economic expansion and lack of time and all, the dust has really been piling up in the corners lately.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  26. Tibet: Counterpoint to Parent Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
    Even today, the Chinese routinely rape and kill Tibetan women and children. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have repeatedly identified Chinese brutality and condemned it.

    The failure of Chinese society is the failure of its culture. Look at Taiwan and Singapore, both being Chinese states. In the latter, the Chinese practice eugenics and have repeatedly banned or censored journals like "The Economist". In the former, the Chinese actually support all the geopolitical objectives of Beijing, including the integration of Tibet into "One China".

  27. Looks like by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 0

    date and time stamps won't be the only things forged.

  28. Re:Tibet: Counterpoint to Parent Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was wondering when you would show up. You're like my favorite troll.

  29. This is the begining of the end... by spikexyz · · Score: 1

    ...of the current government in China. It'll one day, not to long from now, end with political protest, but the government will be virtually dead by then due to the internet.

    1. Re:This is the begining of the end... by westlake · · Score: 1
      ...of the current government in China. It'll one day, not to long from now, end with political protest, but the government will be virtually dead by then due to the internet.

      and John Dean will be sworn in as President come January.

    2. Re:This is the begining of the end... by pjones · · Score: 1

      You mean of course, HOWARD DEAN (yes I'm shouting intentionally ;->).

      --
      Certified Black Helicopter Pilot *** Unwitting Dupe of One World Gov'ment
  30. Coming Soon.... by inkdesign · · Score: 2, Funny

    Chinese Blogger Executed After Testicle Electrocution.

  31. Makes sense... by toupsie · · Score: 1

    There are a lot of cats in China.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  32. Re:Falun Gong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Schools are usually feminist indoctrination centers (atleast in the US). I would never send children to those places.

  33. FEMINISM is what Betrayed You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You were betrayed because your women were worthless women's-rights loving bitches... as are just about all women today. Women band together against men... and men defend them.

    You know it's defacto legal for a woman to chop a man's penis off now in the US and Canada... the women never get any substantial sentances for that capital crime.

    1. Re:FEMINISM is what Betrayed You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I agree that de facto positive discrimination exists in favo(u)r of women thanks to western society's current attitudes, with a bit of de jure thrown in by the more fascist liberals (they caused the contradiction in terms, not me :-).

      I have always spoken out against that wave of feminism, though I do not think the extent to which my relationships were influenced by it was significant.

      Far more relevant, I think, is the extent to which nature makes partnering being about male impressing female - in particular quite specific ways - where best guy wins. Superimpose this upon an otherwise equal playing field and, as long as men want "it" (for varying definitions of "it") more than women, the trusty rules of supply and demand make it clear who profits from the relationship game.

      Still, some enjoy gambling even when the odds are stacked against you. Just don't be fooled that you need to sit at the table and play, no matter how much pressure is applied from every entity from your mother to your television. If you believe you have good qualities and those qualities don't appeal to a woman looking for a (romantic/sexual) partnership, no need to change - you're a good person as you are, and you don't have to shoehorn yourself to ensure you experience everything arbitrarily expected of you. If we all adjusted our characters to what "nature" appears to demand from us, I'd shudder to think how boring and stagnant we'd be...

    2. Re:FEMINISM is what Betrayed You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be wonderfull if men stopped pandering to women. The progression went from chilvary -> feminism very natrually. 2000 years ago men did not pander to women, men were in control and the females were somewhat better. Now men BEG women and worship them and fight for them needlessly. Don't ever beg, she is not above you.

      Also remeber that things that directly benifit you are good for you. Having a chauvinist society where women are '2nd class citizens' and are expected to act nicely is accually good for men obviously... but men support women in there derision of such societies... thus we have this one that hates men.

      What did 'they' think they would get with a women/goddess orented society for the past 200 years?

    3. Re:FEMINISM is what Betrayed You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A chauvinist society doesn't give you (as a man) women who love you, but women who think they need you - and I'm not interested in that. Similarly, a feminist society doesn't give you (as a woman) men who love you, but men who think they need you.

      In each case, when you are superior, you have the opportunity to abuse your position, and, of course, the more generous your vassal, the more you can obtain without anyone around you chastising you.

      But it would also be wonderful if newbie politicians didn't suck up to the cabinet, if middle managers didn't brown nose the boss to the detriment of the engineers, etc. etc. The powerful always become more powerful because it appears that the best way to curry favo(u)r is to give them what they want - and in the short term, it does work; and if you are the biggest/strongest/most profitable, you will get your reward. Otherwise, you lose. Badly.

      Such is the silly fight, and such I avoid with delight.

  34. Re:What's a blog. by 320mb · · Score: 0

    I don't read blogs anyway.......who cares what some script kiddie had for breakfast.........

    --
    === 'Kernel Panic' no sig found:
  35. Re:Falun Gong by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

    Now whats better for poor peasant kids? Hoping to find a spinning wheel in your stomach so you can ascend to heaven, or going to school to learn some skills so they can join the world economy?


    Better for poor peasant kids? How about growing up in a society where one can believe in or do whatever one wants so long as it doesn't harm someone else?

  36. Komintang? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm.. don't you mean proclaiming the benefits of the CCP (or now CPC as they call themselves)? The Komintang/Guomindong is the Nationalist Party which is in Taiwan.

  37. Holy Communist Bullshit Batman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the other hand, unlike many Western countries *cough cough* that send the secret police to "visit" people who wish to express an unpopular opinion, China allows its dissidents a full voice. They of course drown out the voices with their own party-led voices proclaiming the benefits of the Komintang. But as far as stifling free speech, China has one of the best records in that area.

    Robin: Holy communist propaganda Batman! The Slashbots are at it again, attacking the US and making the Communists look like the good guys!

    Batman: Don't worry Robin, the American people don't buy this kind of idiotic communist propaganda that has no basis in reality. Look at who won the 2004 election.

    Robin: Gee Batman, you are right but why does it seem like the world hates us?

    Batman: Yes, Robin, sometimes it seems the world is against America, and rooting for the bad guys.

    Robin: That is ok Batman! It's the World against the United States...The odds are still in our favor!

  38. Re:Falun Gong by tloh · · Score: 1
    Moderation on parent is unfair. The source of the Falun Gong movement is a crackpot by any definition. According to a bbc article:

    "Some of Mr Li's pronouncements are certainly unconventional, some would say just plain strange. He believes aliens walk the Earth and he has reportedly said he can walk through walls and make himself invisible. Mr Li says that he is a being from from a higher level who has come to help humankind from the destruction it could face as the result of rampant evil. "

    Similar characterization from articles in magazines like Newsweek and Times I've read in the past paint him as just another charlatan using a bogus mixture of old traditions and modern fads to spread his own crazy ideas. The tragedy is, China is just begining to open up and so is ripe for reception of this kind of crap. We in the US have had more than our share of lunatics like David Koresh and Marshall Applewhite. By now, we are jaded by bizzare ideas like this. But most chinese are still relatively naive about such things, and so they get caught up in the frenzy. To be fair, you can characterize this thing any way you like. But it is important to keep in mind most slashdotters can't really understand either the Beijing Government or Falun Gong from the perspective of an average Chinese citizen. At the end of the day, most of these political comments from tech enthusiasts are just hot air.
    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
  39. Re:Falun Gong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...So then what d'you do? Sell them to the circus? Send them to a coal mine?

  40. Re:Falun Gong by tloh · · Score: 1
    How about growing up in a society where one can believe in or do whatever one wants so long as it doesn't harm someone else?

    Be careful my friend. One is just as free to choose ignorance and self limitation as one is of choosing happiness and prosperity. The thing about Falun Gong is that it takes obsolete ideas that are often detramental to one's well-being and guilding it over with a thin layer of spirituality and metaphysics. As a health regiment, practitioners have more often than not forgone legitimate medical treatment for serious conditions. You can say such tragedies do not harm anyone else, but that is only in the physical sense. Consider the case when out of 70 million practitioners, true medical health care is devoted to treating the late stages and serious consequences of neglected illnesses. The burden to the national health care system would be huge. It would be like Christian Science being revived in America on a massive scale. Everyone begins to engage in medicinal prayers for health. Meanwhile, doctors in hospitals all over the nation are being forced to deal with the expensive and often fatal late stages of easily treatable ailment. Would *you* be willing to subsidize such religious freedom?

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
  41. Re:Too bad I firewalled the entire country... by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

    So how would you like to write an apology to 1billion+ people? Perhaps a mass email?

    They deserve nothing. As compared to administrators in the US and Canada that i've had to deal with, admin types in China/Korea/Taiwan have been useless when dealing with spam.

    In fact, I don't think i've ever recieved a single piece of return communication when trying to resolve an unsolicited-mail problem with someone in those areas - the crap mail just keeps coming, and I finally had to go ahead and summarily reject or delete any mail I recieved from the aforementioned countries.

    The fact that the idiots send a lot of it in a language I can't even read makes it a lot easier to filter, too.

  42. American TV is different. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You haven't been to Europe, have you? The difference in coverage is drastic.

    But that difference has more to do European TV vs American TV. If you just watch any program there are drastic differences. A nipple on non-cable TV in America causes an uproar, in Europe it's commonplace.

    You don't see any Americans killed or wounded (the latter only after they're safe, cleaned up and "wanting to go back there, sir" even without their legs).

    Nor do they show any Iraqi's killed or wounded, nor do they ever show any graphical violence in a newscast or on network television.

    You don't see many Iraqis killed or wounded, save the occasional wounded child from an insurgent bomb.

    Uhhh,proof please? You would not see a mangled childs body from an insurgents bomb on American Television. You are merely making this up due to your own bias. I guess the mods find your bias 'interesting'.

    Usually either of these happens only if the story is 'big' like the one time a helicopter fired on civilians and got on tape (or the torture). Those films, too, are edited.

    American press is strange in that regard, they will show a helicopter going down, or a car accident but they will never show a murder caused by a gunshot or a beheading. Look at 9/11, the news networks saw people jumping off the WTC and then STOPPED showing it because they were told it wasn't 'tasteful'. The American press isn't being censored, they are simply self-regulating. They fear the backlash they would encounter for showing graphical violence.

    Personally, I have seen plenty of the beheadings, American soldiers and Iraqi's being killed via the internet. I think the American news channels that are on cable should show these, the American people have a right to know what they are up against. If you think Americans were pissed off post-9/11...if half of them had seen the beheading videos on Ogrish.com you would have them calling for a stronger effort on the war on terror.

  43. Re:Falun Gong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...So then what d'you do? Sell them to the circus? Send them to a coal mine?

    It's called home schooling. If you don't want your child to become a feminazi commnist you have to educate them yourself.

  44. That is why national Health Care is a Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consider the case when out of 70 million practitioners, true medical health care is devoted to treating the late stages and serious consequences of neglected illnesses. The burden to the national health care system would be huge.

    You can say this about just about any lifestyle choice. Smokers burdon the national health care system, should smoking be illegal? Gay Men are more likely to catch aids than straight men, which would ruin a national health care system. Should anal sex be illegal then? Moreover, homosexual women are less likely to catch aids than hetrosexual women. Maybe women should only be allowed to be gay, and men should not be allowed to have sex at all. Lesbian women can just mine their sperm. After all, that is what would cost a national health care system the least amount of money.

    While we are on that subject, gay marriage in America would mean that gays would be able to collect social security pensions upon their partners death. This will burdon an already stressed social security system. Is this a good enough reason to deny marrage to homosexuals? Or are personal freedoms more important than socialist programs?

    1. Re:That is why national Health Care is a Failure by tloh · · Score: 1
      This is hardly a black and white issue. I never refered to it as one. Note the question: " would *you* be willing to subsidize such religious freedom?" Your personal convictions are obvious through your tone, but you didn't bite the bullet. For what it's worth, here is where I stand in the shade of grey.

      Yes, smoking should be illegal. Tobacco products have no redeeming value and in the light of all it's negative effects, there is no reason at all for anyone to be consuming this product.

      Aids and other STDs are not an intrinsic part of human sexuality. People don't get sick just by virtue of being gay or male or female. Anyone is capable of choosing to practicing safe sex. Being of one gender or one orientation does not give a person free reigns to engage in risky behaviour. And that should be good enough for any health care system.

      I believe a person does not choose his/her sexuality, and so should not be held responsible for the consequences of ones gender or orientation. This is something society needs to accept and integrate into existing institutions. As far as sexuality is concerned, I don't believe there is any personal freedom at all. You are what you are. The rest of the world just has to learn to deal with it.

      But religion is different. Religion is not who you are. It is something you're taught and choose to accept. Certainly one should have the freedom to choose. But morality dictates that you must choose within the confines of ethics acceptable to your religion. If your religion condones prosperng at the expense of others, it is an idea you choose to accept.

      I believe one should have the wisdom to distinguish between a good idea and a bad one and be rational enough to understand cause and effect. But the very nature of freedom dictates that one should be also free to choose harm. But why should anyone what to choose harm? The only reasons I can concieve of are that you are either too stupid to know any better or you are plain malicious. Since neither are of benefit to anyone, it makes sense to nip both in the bud. As far as I'm concerned, when you excercise the personal freedom to be evil or idiotic, you don't deserve to be a part of any program be it socialist or otherwise.

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
  45. Re:Falun Gong by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile, doctors in hospitals all over the nation are being forced to deal with the expensive and often fatal late stages of easily treatable ailment. Would *you* be willing to subsidize such religious freedom?


    In that case I'd propose those individuals be denied care unless they can pay for it themselves. I'd have no problem with tax money being spent on educating people about the possible consequenses of their actions (just like anti-smoking commercials). People should be free to live their lives as they see fit, even if they are harming themselves, but they must also take responsibility for their actions. Freedom and responsibility go hand in hand. I'd rather have both than neither.

  46. Re:Falun Gong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you teach your daughter anything other than how to embroider, or would that reek of feminism?

  47. Re:Falun Gong by Kphrak · · Score: 1

    By now, we are jaded by bizzare ideas like this. But most chinese are still relatively naive about such things, and so they get caught up in the frenzy.

    China had groups that got into these "bizarre ideas" long before Western cynicism. A recent example (by Chinese standards) that Westerners might remember was the Boxer Rebellion, very similar to the Falun Gong, which occured about a hundred years ago.

    I wouldn't write the Falun Gongs off as unsophisticated rubes just yet. There's a reason why the Beijing government wants to get rid of them, and it's not because they care how superstitous their people are; China is filled with superstitions. It's because when lots of people in China (and perhaps, to a lesser extent, other countries) start joining a religious society, it's generally because they're tired of their political society. Those guys may sound like they're talking daft superstition, but what they're really talking about is a change in the government, and I'm quite sure that Beijing knows this.

    --

    There's no sig like this sig anywhere near this sig, so this must be the sig.
  48. Re:Falun Gong by tloh · · Score: 1

    The Boxers were *nothing* like the Falun Gong of today. The boxers, right from the beginning, had political motives. Primarily though, they were anti-foreigners rather than anti-government and were not rebel in the strictest sense of the world. But that is besides the point. It seems to me such a pairing compares apples to oranges. The Boxers incident may be recent relative to the entire history of Chinese culture, but in terms of direct influence (and by this I mean the continuity of cultural consciousness) it was a lifetime ago. The Chinese society of today bares little resemblence to the one of the early 1900s. For the culture of the period, the ideas that sustained the boxers were not strange at all. A more appropriate analogy of the Boxers would be with the Native American "Ghost Dancers" of wounded knee. My personal opinion is that both groups had legitimate grips and were confronting them more or less directly within the expressive limits of their beliefs. Falun Gong, on the other hand, is a cult that spews wishy-washy political criticism under the veil of religious activities. As a religion, it is too inconsistant and immature to be taken seriously. The only thing it has going for it is really the same kind of momentum generated by a good advertising campaign in a large consumer population hungry for a new fad. In spiritual beliefs, I think they're closer to Christian Science. (For a good expose of Christian Science, consult Mark Twain or Martin Gardner.)

    But you are right on several points. Falun Gong is blatantly political in private motives if not public expression. And they are not unsophisticated at all. More than any conventional dissident political movement, they have mastered the use of the Internet (instant messaging, usenet, etc.) to effectively coordinate activity and communicate among organizers. The sordidness lies in the fact that ordinary practitioners are being unwittingly manipulated into being foot soldiers for political oposition against the central government. Think about it, if you practice any religion properly within the privacy of your own home, who really cares? Falun Gong, on the other hand, has organized huge crowds of practitioners who perform in public places as publicity stunts to intentionally piss off critics. The Falun Gong movement is a tool for political motives with no real regard for what little spirituality it embodies. I think you're right Beijing knows Falun Gong has ill intentions toward the current regime, but the sad thing is most Falun Gong followers don't.

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
  49. Re:Falun Gong by tloh · · Score: 1

    I think that is a very good private attitude to adopt. In fact, I'm inclined to endorse such an action for public implimentation out of personal conviction. But I feel such a thing is not practical or realistic. The ACLU (or it's equivalent, should there be one) would be up in arms over religious discrimination. Comparing it to anti-smoking commercials just illustrates how silly the whole thing really is. I mean, why do we even bother to continue allowing tobacco products to be produced and sold given it's negative effects? Is there anything of tangible value in cigarettes? The idea of freedom is concieved with the goal of removing obstacles and barriers to growth and development. In contrast, the american attitude of "just because I can" is just an idiotic notion with no redeeming value.

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
  50. Re:Falun Gong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, of course! Proper fallatio techniques are essential skills for any young woman.