Slashdot Mirror


NYC's Educational Dark Fiber Network

An anonymous reader submits "A group of educational leaders in New York City has created a new fiber backbone network off previously layed but unused fiber. Connecting many city NYSERNet members (the Museum of Natural History, CUNY, Mt. Sinai-NYU Medical, Cornell Med., Columbia Med., and Columbia's primary campus), the newly activated backbone connects to Internet2 and commodity Internet and intends to be largely used for video streaming. Original plan info here."

101 comments

  1. Say No More by CleverNickedName · · Score: 5, Funny

    intends to be largely used for video streaming.

    *Wink wink*

    --


    Unfortunately, I am not Wil Wheaton
    1. Re:Say No More by sjrstory · · Score: 0

      I'm sure there will be plenty of videos transferred, but with the help of

    2. Re:Say No More by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Look, if he was dying, he wouldn't bother to post 'Aaaaaaah'. He'd just say it!

    3. Re:Say No More by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Perhaps he was dictating

    4. Re:Say No More by n2ygk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, mostly high-end music lessons: http://www.columbia.edu/acis/networks/advanced/

    5. Re:Say No More by Darth23 · · Score: 1

      So I guess that asking if pr0n is considered 'educational' is a little obvious.

      --

      -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

  2. ffs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    "and intends to be largely used for video streaming"

    is intended to be

    bloody yanks

    1. Re:ffs... by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 1, Insightful
      bloody yanks
      I'm sorry, but I fail to connect the grammatical error with the statement 'bloody yanks'. Mangling the language occurs on both sides of the pond, you know.
      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    2. Re:ffs... by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      ...and yet a new fiber backbone network off previously layed fibre sailed straight past.

      s/off/from/

      Perhaps the terrible command of English is why the story poster wished to remain anonymous.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    3. Re:ffs... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      ...and yet a new fiber backbone network off previously layed fibre

      s/off/from/


      s/layed/laid/

    4. Re:ffs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vietnam was not a war for America. Nor was Korea, for that matter. Both were UN police actions for which the US supplied troops.

      But congrats on the outcome of the US revolution. And the War of 1812. Oh, and keeping the Empire. Yeah, congrats.

    5. Re:ffs... by DrSkwid · · Score: 1


      lol, how did I type that, idiot.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    6. Re:ffs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

    7. Re:ffs... by TheEnigma · · Score: 1

      This goes far beyond Americanization of English. Note the imaginary word "layed" in place of "lain". Just because a person reads slashdot doesn't mean that they can write worth a damn.

      If only the slashdot editors had any kind of real claim to that title, then they might actual edit stories, instead of just filtering them.

      --

      Stand back. I've got a brain and I'm not afraid to use it.

    8. Re:ffs... by Skevin · · Score: 1

      > s/layed/laid/

      Leave it to slashdotters to mispell "laid". It must not come up in conversation much...

      Solomon Chang

      --
      "Twice half-assed makes an ass whole." --Solomon K. Chang
    9. Re:ffs... by DrSkwid · · Score: 1


      those who can, do

      those who can't, talk about it

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  3. A lot of this? by StevenHenderson · · Score: 3, Funny
    A group of educational leaders in New York City has created a new fiber backbone network off previously layed but unused fiber.

    How many instances of this are there across the US/world? Unused fiber? Find some for me!

    1. Re:A lot of this? by Jouser · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, there is a lot. During the dot-com boom lots of companies/startups were running and laying fiber. Since the dot-com bust, all the fiber became unlit and hence dark fiber.

      In Ohio we've recently completed our Third Frontier Network which was largely built from dark fiber.

    2. Re:A lot of this? by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      At times during the bubble, for every used fibre there were 100 dark ones.
      The material of the fibre isnt the cost factor, its the electronics driving them. So its easy to just dump a whole bunch instead a single one into the ground and buy the trancievers years later...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    3. Re:A lot of this? by kenelbow · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The main reason for a glut of dark fiber is not actually the dot-com bust, contrary to popular belief. The main reason is the use of Dense Wave Division Multiplexing (DWDM). This allows A LOT more data to be sent over the same pipe as before, thus rendering the majority of that fiber useless. Don't get me wrong, the dot-com bust had a MAJOR impact on the use of fiber, but it wasn't the main factor in the dark fiber glut.

      --
      What witty sig? I can't be witty, I'm a Methodist.
    4. Re:A lot of this? by tohlan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think it is more likely that DWDM equipment allows fiber someone already owns to be used more efficiently. I don't know of any company that gets rid of fiber they have because they put DWDM on a couple of strands. Its like saying that there are more video games on the market because we all have more free time now days. Sure, DWDM lets you cram more data down a particular strand of fiber, but the need for capacity is increasing too, and laying new fiber is very expensive (especially transoceanic fiber).

    5. Re:A lot of this? by kenelbow · · Score: 1

      I didn't say that they got rid of fiber, or maybe I didn't make myself clear. DWDM didn't cause anyone to get rid of fiber, it just means that there is a lot of UNUSED fiber. There is an enormous potential for bandwidth that was brought about by DWDM, but the expense is whats holding it back. The problem is that there will always be limited fund, thus limited bandwidth.

      --
      What witty sig? I can't be witty, I'm a Methodist.
    6. Re:A lot of this? by b00le · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here in Rome (that's in Italy for any Republicans who might be reading /. ...) there a lots of little blue corrugated plastic tubes sticking out of the pavement of my district with plastic bath plugs and bits of string closing them off. Of course most of these plugs have been pulled off, so you can see that the tubes are empty. I have been told - but cannot confirm - that these were intended to carry fibre optic cables in some abandoned enterprise. Since the hard work has been done it seems a pity not to use them.

    7. Re:A lot of this? by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 5, Informative
      Since the dot-com bust, all the fiber became unlit and hence dark fiber.

      This isn't the only source of unused fiber - The majority of the fiber in the ground has never been lit. It costs almost as much to lay one strand as a hundred, so everybody laid a hundred, plus empty conduit it could be blown through later. The stuff on the ends however, is expensive, so they don't light it till they need it.

      --
      Why?
    8. Re:A lot of this? by mr.+methane · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, most of the huge chunks of unlit fibers are business fiascos. An example was Enron Broadband; they had HUGE chunks of fiber, but between city pairs which were almost useless.

      Dark, uncommited fiber between useful places is more scarce. While there was a big surplus back in late 2000, a lot of that has been eaten up by increased demand. Cable and telcos have a lot of metro fiber which got laid (stop smirking) in the late 90's and is starting to get lit up for things like video on demand - all those patch panels which were blank for years are starting to look busy.

    9. Re:A lot of this? by bazily · · Score: 1
      I'm sure they're all over, but nobody is going to share the secret.

      Sharing video must be a threat to national security too!

      --
      Why cut IT when your office space costs $3/sf? gibso
    10. Re:A lot of this? by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      First dark matter...
      Then came dark energy...
      Now, the third and final installment...DUNH DUNH DUNH...

      DARK FIBER!!!

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
  4. Space, bandwidth, and digging holes. by RealProgrammer · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From TFPDF:
    • Our (and Cornell's) affiliated hospital, NewYork-Presbyterian, has a significantly larger leased ATM infrastructure at DS-3 and OC-3 rates interconnecting about a dozen buildings. We were separately and collectively paying a lot for bandwidth in Manhattan.
      • In rural Illinois we just run cable up the Interstate or build another series of attractive microwave towers when bandwidth gets short.

        The problems of running a network, and a university for that matter, in a metropolis such as New York or Chicago are completely different. We have lots of cheap space but very little infrastructure, while they have too much infrastructure and hardly any space.

        We just dig a hole and lay cable; in NYC all the holes have already been taken.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:Space, bandwidth, and digging holes. by geoffspear · · Score: 1, Funny
      We just dig a hole and lay cable; in NYC all the holes have already been taken.

      And you wouldn't believe the rent you've got to pay to live in one of them.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  5. wit the summary by dq5+studios · · Score: 4, Funny

    intends to be largely used for video streaming.
    You misspelled sharing.

    1. Re:wit the summary by magarity · · Score: 0

      That one was obvious. What wasn't so obvious was what the heck they meant by 'layed'. I had to look at that one a few beats before figuring it out.

  6. CUNY? by wackysootroom · · Score: 2, Funny

    I misread that one at first. The first thoughts that come running through me are that first /. puts the word scrotum on the front page and now this?

    1. Re:CUNY? by zephmode · · Score: 1

      CUNY = City University of New York

      There are tons of these colleges under the CUNY system. My brother is currently attending one of them, La Guardia Community College.

  7. an AWFUL lot of this by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    most of the cost of running fiber anywhere is backhoe. once you've dug a trench, the cost implications for adding double the amount of fiber/cable you actually need is negligible - so you put loads in to allow for future expansion. this extra fiber just sits there until it's needed, or until other fiber breaks and is swapped over to the spare capacity...

  8. bandwidth issues by millahtime · · Score: 1

    Ya know... in the US we have slower bandwidth than most of the other tech countries of the world. It's not for lack of the fiber being there. It's more controls on the speeds so when they increase it a little we compare it to ourselves not what else is out there.

    Glad to see someone using some of it for somethign productive.

    1. Re:bandwidth issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We may have slower HOME BROADBAND bandwidth, but that doesn't directly relate to this. If you want to buy bandwidth, you can buy as much (or more) here as anywhere else on Earth. The only people left in the cold are the people wanting 100 megabit $40/month connections.

    2. Re:bandwidth issues by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      It's all political BS. If US really gave a damn, we'd have 20x the speed of Korea's and Japan's network. But nope... we measure our country by the size of our guns.

  9. can anyone explain by spectrokid · · Score: 3, Funny

    what kind of video gets streamed from a natural history museum to a hospital? More seriously, here in Denmark, the electricity companies want to get in on the game, but nobady really knows where all that fiber got dumped during the bubble. One company ordered fiber along a road, and then found out there was already dark fiber: the company they asked to dig the trenches had also dug the previous ones. If it was me, I would have kept my mouth shut, but then again...

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

    1. Re:can anyone explain by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Maybe the hospital and the museum shouldn't be connected by the Internet, either? They're connected because they both generate and consume bandwidth, and they're people - they will communicate with each other if they can. We build networks for people, not data - and these people are researchers, inventing the future. In five years, look back at what video they did stream, and learn - that's this community's specialty.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    2. Re:can anyone explain by PastaLover · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the museum but I do know that hospitals sometimes stream live feeds from operations. That's one possible use. Since this is in some way connected to education a network like this could probably be used to give classes by streaming them to the students. A sufficiently high resolution image would be needed (how else would they make out what their professor is cutting in) so a big pipe would probably come in handy.

  10. The speed of dark by Matey-O · · Score: 5, Informative

    Having dark capacity isn't surprising when you look at the economics.

    1. Cost of laying a single strand of fiber: $12,000,000 NewYenRubles

    2. Cost of laying 24 strands of fiber:
    $12,000,001 NewYenRubles

    At the time I worked for the local DOT, they laid 22 odd strands of fiber down the major highways in town, and used the revenue generated from selling off fiber to halp fund the project. It's good for the DOT as it lowers costs, and it's good for Telco/ISP/whoever because they don't have to dig a seonc trench, obtain permission, rip up roads again, etc.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  11. Re:Say No More, know what I mean by RealProgrammer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nudge, nudge, know what I mean, say no more!

    Man: Well, I mean like,... you've SLEPT, with a lady...

    Squire: Yes...

    Man: What's it like?

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
  12. In other news... by FJ · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Accoring to news.com, a small town in Louisiana is waiting for telephone service to be installed.

    Yep. Life is fair.

    1. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not too hard to believe. Up until 1998 the only telephone service available in my area was party lines. Having to share a phone line w/ neighbors = 73h 5u>0rz. Recently DSL became available. W00t for DSL!

    2. Re:In other news... by pklong · · Score: 0

      It's not uncommon for people in Britain to not have a telephone (students in student houses, broke people in bedsits and those who can't / won't pay the bill).

      Of course a solution (albeit a nasty laggy one) for these residents would be satellite internet and VOIP.

      --

      Philip

      Signatures are broken

    3. Re:In other news... by EvilStein · · Score: 0

      "John Ray, who shoots deer and squirrels from his front porch and cooks up batches of fragrant gumbo"

      You never know, they might have whacked a Bellsouth technician or two and not realized it. There could be a damn good reason that they don't have phone service out there. :P

    4. Re:In other news... by Inda · · Score: 1

      Come off it dude. It is uncommon not to have a telephone in the UK.

      There have been telephones in all the bedsits and student accommodation I've lived in over the last fifteen years. Telephones with slots for coinage, but still telephones all the same.

      Maybe it was 'not uncommon' twenty years ago but not now.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    5. Re:In other news... by smacktits · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One must also into account the massive popularity of mobile phones. I know plenty people who eschew landlines in favour of mobile devices. Not because they are poor, but because they prefer the convenience. Myself included. Having to remember one number is better than two or three different ones.

    6. Re:In other news... by sgtrock · · Score: 1
      You never know, they might have whacked a Bellsouth technician or two and not realized it.


      Spoken like someone who has (a) never been outside a city's beltway and (b) never even held a gun (let alone shot one) in his life. Maybe you should do a little quiet research before you start throwing around such ignorant statements about other people's lives.
    7. Re:In other news... by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      Kevin F. Curtin, a spokesman for BellSouth, said that Mink had been unclaimed territory but that the utility was complying with a state order to annex Mink into its service area, at a cost of $700,000--or about $46,000 per customer. The communications industry contributes to a national Universal Service Fund that underwrites uneconomical service in sparsely populated areas, but it has yet to be activated in Louisiana, said Curtin, leaving BellSouth stuck with the tab. But the Louisiana Public Service Commission said it expected to reimburse BellSouth out of a new state service fund next year.

      Can that be right? $700,000 to run phone line (and polls?) to a rural town? I would imagine there are utility polls already there, and there is probably even telephone signaling within a few tens of miles. It can't possibly cost more than a couple hundred grand. Less than 1/3 what the article quotes. BellSouth is just being assinine about it.

      I see other good options too - like VOIP and link via long range wireless signal. Put the antenna up on some tall structures. Surely you could construct the whole rig for under $50K.

      Geek challenge anyone?

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    8. Re:In other news... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      It can't possibly cost more than a couple hundred grand. Less than 1/3 what the article quotes. BellSouth is just being assinine about it.

      Why do you think it would be cheaper? You sound like the kind of jackass I sometimes have to work for who complains that "all you did was hook up some wires" when I bill him for 3 hours work at $85/hr. Have you ever strung cabling? Set up a CO? Installed any utilities through public rights-of-way? There's more to it than you think, and skilled labor isn't cheap.

      I see other good options too - like VOIP and link via long range wireless signal. Put the antenna up on some tall structures. Surely you could construct the whole rig for under $50K.

      Seeing how they don't even have phone service, I'd like to know how you're going to get the internet connectivity out to them to start up this wonderful VOIP solution. The whole rig for $50K? Yer nuts, man. The transmitter for your "long range wireless signal" will likely cost that much by itself. And each residence will require a transceiver. And all this will have to be installed, not by uninsured nerds working for free, but by actual skilled technicians covered by liability insurance. And this whole wireless system will need to be maintained. Are those free nerds going to hang around troubleshooting forever? I doubt it.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    9. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He 1) lives in The City, and 2) used the verb "whacked". That means he's Cosa Nostra and probably has held a gun before, just not a hunting rifle.

      Er... or did I just make an ignorant statement about other people's lives.

    10. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      {applause}

      Precisely what I was thinking. Far too many people comment on things they have no idea about.

    11. Re:In other news... by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      Why do you think it would be cheaper? You sound like the kind of jackass I sometimes have to work for who complains that "all you did was hook up some wires" when I bill him for 3 hours work at $85/hr. Have you ever strung cabling? Set up a CO? Installed any utilities through public rights-of-way? There's more to it than you think, and skilled labor isn't cheap.

      Seeing how they don't even have phone service, I'd like to know how you're going to get the internet connectivity out to them to start up this wonderful VOIP solution. The whole rig for $50K? Yer nuts, man. The transmitter for your "long range wireless signal" will likely cost that much by itself. And each residence will require a transceiver. And all this will have to be installed, not by uninsured nerds working for free, but by actual skilled technicians covered by liability insurance. And this whole wireless system will need to be maintained. Are those free nerds going to hang around troubleshooting forever? I doubt it.


      You're a telco monkey? Congratulations on screwing people out of $85 an hour - you should be proud.

      And you've bassackwards what I said, and then just cocked it all up. There would be one wireless connection to a neighboring town. The antenna on the local end would feed into a switch and distribute telephone over normal means. Perhaps that's not "VOIP", but rather a T1 through the air. Ditch the whole VOIP thing - I misspoke. Just replace a copper T1 that apparently would cost $700,000 with a wireless one instead.

      For crap's sake, you could move the entire town for $700,000.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    12. Re:In other news... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      You're a telco monkey? Congratulations on screwing people out of $85 an hour - you should be proud.

      Work costs money, and that's the prevailing rate for telecom work. You think that $85 goes straight into my pocket? After insurance, taxes, payroll, etc., I'm doing well if I see $20 of that.

      And you've bassackwards what I said, and then just cocked it all up. There would be one wireless connection to a neighboring town. The antenna on the local end would feed into a switch and distribute telephone over normal means.

      You clearly have no clue what is involved in wiring a town for phone service. The expense isn't in getting the bandwidth to handle calls into the town-- that can be a couple strands of fiber and takes maybe a week-- it's getting a fucking copper pair into each and every house from the central point where the fiber comes in. Your ingenious plan is the same as their plan, only with the unnecessary complexity of a wireless link instead of fiber.

      Just replace a copper T1 that apparently would cost $700,000 with a wireless one instead.

      So everyone just walks to the center of town where this T1 terminates and plugs their phone in there? I don't think so. Think it through. You have to string copper lines to each and every god damned customer. You think the town is pre-wired and just never could convince anyone to run a fiber line along the road to hook them up? Cripes, you're dense.

      For crap's sake, you could move the entire town for $700,000.

      Hyperbole and ignorance. What a wonderful debate technique!

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  13. Re:Language question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be the latter.

  14. Five Colleges Network (was Re:A lot of this?) by Ristretto · · Score: 1

    The same thing is happening in western Massachusetts to connect The Five Colleges (Amherst College, Hampshire College, Mount Holyoke, Smith, and the University of Massachusetts, Amherst).

  15. Same thing here! by Sfing_ter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Monterey County CA, the maintenance guys were looking in some "unmarked" panels in the basement in the Salinas offices, and "found" about 200 strands of dark fiber. Apparently during the reign of one of the iterations of our local cable service (TCI/AT&T/Comcast, AT&T did it I know it :), they "knew" that fiber was the future and laid fiber all over the place, then they sold out to comcast without hooking any of it up.

    Montery started by connecting to schools and cities down the 101 highway, when MCOE lost antenna space for their educational television feed, they ran it down the fiber backbone, without causing any lag in any of the connections. So now places that were running 56k frame relays are now flying with 45mb to their router. They actually have a bigger connection than my isp :)

    I just need a small space, near the router, I will stand, I don't need a chair, I just want to FEEL the bandwidth, please?

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
    1. Re:Same thing here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasted "dark" fiber eh... that's just sad. Especially when the U.S. doesn't have (for the most part) real broad band. I live in Tokyo, and I have a 100Mbps fiber line in my apartment. Not a measily 45Mbps. Most people want to know what the real-life speed is. I usually get a real-life thruput of approx. 65Mbps to sites in Japan. I transfered a 550Mb file to a friend's server (who uses a different ISP and fiber provider for that matter!) in under 7 minutes, at peak hours. Now that's impressive.

      Since I'm a geek, and the bandwidth is affordable (this is NOT industrial stuff, it's your average Joe's "broad band" connection) I also have a 24Mbps ADSL line. 1.5Mbps up, 24Mbps down. And it feels slooooooooow.

    2. Re:Same thing here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      less than 45mbps is pretty pathetic for an ISP; at the totally small time, super rural ISP I work for, we have a 155mbps cannection to an one telco, and a 45mbps link to another. This is with less than 20k customers.

      If you want to FEEL the bandwidth, walk into a Telco CO sometime. They rarely bug you if you act like you should be there, and even tiny ones usualy run OC-48, at least internally.

  16. VPNet Anyone? by CyberDave · · Score: 2, Informative
    VPNet, Spokane, WA: The Virtual Possibilities Network.

    Built from dark fiber once owned by Avista Utilities before they spun off the telecom stuff and, specifically, the fiber to Columbia Fiber Solutions. (Also includes a couple of leased OC-3 lines.) Been in planning for a couple of years and back in September had the ceremonial launch and press event. It's all gigabit networking between the core routers in each node (except for the aforementioned OC-3 lines). Connects all the major educational institutions in the area as well as several research and commercial firms. As of right now, all the fiber is lit and the core routers are connected. Some sites (like the one I work at) are still waiting for network drops to be made from the router to the computer labs (red tape...). Should have an Internet2 connection as soon as another project (something Gigapop, my memory's a bit fuzzy on that) is completed in the next year or so.

    Eastern Washington University, Cheney

    Eastern Washington University, Spokane at Riverpoint

    Gonzaga University

    Inland Northwest Health Services (INHS)

    Intercollegiate College of Nursing, WSU College of Nursing

    North Idaho College

    Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)

    Community Colleges of Spokane (Spokane Community College)

    Spokane Intercollegiate Research and Technology Institute (SIRTI)

    Spokane Public Schools

    University of Idaho

    University of Idaho, Research Park, Post Falls

    Washington State University, Pullman

    Washington State University, Spokane

    Whitworth College

    Website: http://www.vpnet.org (a little bland at the moment, but still good info).

    1. Re:VPNet Anyone? by CyberDave · · Score: 1

      BTW, if any of you can't figure that out, that list of links is the list of current members of the VPnet project.

      Shameless plug, if anyone cares: I'm a grad student in Computer Science at Eastern Washington University, where, among other things, I work on the Inland Northwest Collaborative E-Learning Project (INCEP).

      CyberDave

    2. Re:VPNet Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it wasn't just CFS that got the old Avista fiber. XO comm (CLEC) got some, but mostly Avista had defaulted on the loans to pay for the fiber, and the counties were left holding the bag.

      Thus, many PUDs ended up with a big fat lot of dark fiber. The Grant county PUD actually turned it into a FTTH project, and several companies provide v/d/v over that "ZIPP fiber" network.

      Whitman county PUD, however, has turned it into a private little commisioners fiefdom, and has lit less than 1/10 of 1% of it.

  17. Dark Fiber Maps? by Mr.Sharpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does anybody know of any resources or maps concerning the location and availability of dark fiber? I am sure there is a great deal of it laying out there along the roadside, in the sewers, and under the sidewalks just waiting for an application. Unfortunately, it's a pain in the ass to find out who owns what, and who to contact in your area. Some maps or perhaps a dark fiber market would be nice. Any suggestions?

  18. It's stuff like this by Corellon+Larethian · · Score: 2, Informative

    that makes the MPAA and RIAA wet themselves.

    WH00T!

  19. It's not previously-laid fiber -- it's brand new by n2ygk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Despite the fact that several bidders offered to lease us their unused installed fiber we got a better price, better engineering, and better quality of fiber (SMF28e low water peak) by having brand new fiber installed. I have a map that shows me exactly where my fiber goes. (No, I can't share it with you.)

  20. Hell yeah! by Hyperkinetic · · Score: 0

    I work for Columbia as a sys admin and have been anticipating this for months. It's sure gonna beat our unreliable microwave link from the main campus. As it is, the current connection is pretty fast. I can download a full 700Meg .iso in under 10 minutes. I have a feeling after becoming jaded on the i2, the 3Mb/s cable modem at home is going to feel like 2400 baud!

  21. Re:It's not previously-laid fiber -- it's brand ne by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    So "dark fiber" is not really the correct word here. BTW, I have NEVER seen the article's definition for dark fiber used before, I have always seen it used to describe the excess unlit fiber that is always installed when someone runs fiber. As many earlier posters pointed out, in most situations (especially long-haul ones that involve digging), the cost of running 100 fibers instead of one is insignificant compared to the cost of digging a hole to install the fiber in.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  22. dark fiber by cygnus · · Score: 2, Funny

    is there any indication that the discovery of this so-called 'dark fiber' could change our understanding of if the universe will end in a singularity or endless expansion?

    --
    Just raise the taxes on crack.
    1. Re:dark fiber by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
      'dark fiber' could change our understanding of if the universe will end in a singularity

      Because we all know we need plenty of dark fiber for re^D^Dsingularity.

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  23. Re:It's not previously-laid fiber -- it's brand ne by n2ygk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes "dark" is the right term. It means no telco is lighting it with their SONET or whatever equipment and then selling me a managed service. We have 20-year rights to several strands of actual glass end-to-end which we can light with whatever we want. We could send morse code by flashlight (torch for the bloody UK poster:-) but instead we chose to start with 10 gigabit Ethernet. I think the term you are looking for describing previsouly laid and unproductive fiber is "distressed assets." ;-)

  24. NYSERnet by molo · · Score: 1

    NYSERnet (New York State Educaction and Research network) was the only provider for my school in Rochester, NY. Our packets ended up routed through some awful Sprintlink drop in Washington DC before they went anywhere. That sprintlink drop had all kinds of problems, high latency, bad routing to pretty much everywhere, and would occasionally just stop forwarding packets.

    NYSERnet may be fine for those organizations in NYC, but for upstate, it really sucked.

    They went through some upgrades in the past couple years, so hopefully things have gotten better. But NYSERnet really is a sore subject for me. It ruined many a Quake game. :(

    -molo

    --
    Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
    1. Re:NYSERnet by owens · · Score: 1

      NYSERNet used to resell Sprintlink service, but that hasn't been the case for a rather long time. At present, the schools in Rochester have connections to multiple commercial ISPs, as well as connections to the NYSERNet research and education backbone. The NYSERNet network connects them to the global R&E infrastructure via Abilene, CA*net 4 and other similar backbones. The NYC dark fiber project is also a NYSERNet activity, but a separate one.

      It is perhaps worth pointing out that NYSERNet never actually ran the Sprintlink network nor the Pennsauken NAP, and that providing bandwidth for Quake games probably wasn't at the top of the priority list for your school's network administrators. . .

    2. Re:NYSERnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *shrugs* I goto Webster (A school in Rochester)

      Our packets all seem to go though roadrunner.

      I wonder if there's any kinda dark fiber to be found around my neighborhood? Anythign faster than RR.. anythign!!

  25. Commodity Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is the "commodity Internet" ??!

  26. Join Me, on the Dark Fiber! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Feel the power of the Dark Fiber,

    Luke I am your father...

  27. Better colours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  28. Re:It's stuff like this - Heck, they're likely pay by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    the newly activated backbone connects to Internet2

    Heck, they're probably paying for this as their own backdoor into I2. They've been trying to get in hard enough otherwise.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  29. Columbia's Connection sounds surprisingly wimpy by billstewart · · Score: 2, Informative
    Columbia's announcement says they've increased their internet connectivity to ~300 Mbps, from their previous 150 Mbps. Seems kind of wimpy - I'd have expected an announcement that says they're running at least gigabit connections to the other participants in the study. Maybe they're doing that and the press release just doesn't mention it? Or did they just start cheap and reuse their existing OC3 cards, while maybe some of the other players have fast connections to each other?

    If you wade through the piles of documentation, it looks like they've got dark fiber routes from each of the participants to racks at a couple of hub locations where they can meet with each other and Nysernet and also crossconnect to other carriers at a carrier-neutral facility. That means they could be running whatever combination they want of DWDM or CWDM, 10 Gig Ether, 1 Gig Ether, or traditional SONET (155 Mbps x 1,4,16,64) depending on how much they want to spend on CPE. I couldn't tell how many fiber pairs they were deploying per customer, but they're using fairly new high-end fiber that supports almost anything. The cheapest way to light up the stuff is with GigE fiber connections, since you can get by with a pretty small router, and cheap cards for short-distance hops, but CWDM is coming down in price (Coarse Wavelength Division Multiplexing doesn't get as many channels per fiber as Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing, but the hardware's a lot cheaper) so you should be able to run multiple GigEs or whatever else you feel like. It looks like hardware costs for the CWDM versions are on the order of $5-10K per FDX GigE channel.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Columbia's Connection sounds surprisingly wimpy by CowbertPrime · · Score: 1

      If their infrastructure compares anything to the CT Edu. Network, they probably are using OC3 interfaces on their edge routers to the POP but internal GigE within NYSERNET. (CEN uses gigE between routers, and ATM/OC-3 to the actual Internets), so if Columbia is merely talking about capacity out of their ISP, then they may have faster intranet links.

  30. The Internet 2 by ErikZ · · Score: 1


    I don't understand. What kind of experments are they doing on "The Internet 2"? The design is already set in stone right? So what they have now is a faster network...and?

    From here it just looks like a big toy.

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  31. Breakfast by Dynamic1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I like a little dark fiber and milk in the morning. Helps me poop.