Slashdot Mirror


Re-Pet a Reality

tigerdarklord writes "The Sci-Fi concept of pet cloning has become a commercial venture. Genetic Savings & Clone now not only offers genebanking for your pet (alive or recently dead), but a full service cloning shop. Although they started by producing two clones of the CEO's cat, they have now produced their first commercial clone for a woman from Texas. GSC has modified their cloning procedure to overcome the resemblance issues demonstrated when the College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M, created CopyCat. The technology looks promising but the $50,000 price tag will prove to place the service out of the reach of most pet owners."

47 of 482 comments (clear)

  1. I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Welcome our furry overlords!

    1. Re:I for one by mausmalone · · Score: 3, Funny

      /me shoots you. twice.

      --
      -=-=-=-=-=
      I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
    2. Re:I for one by Thangodin · · Score: 5, Funny

      $50,000 to clone my cat? Christ, I paid $250 to have the sucker put down, and I thought that was a lot...

  2. Looking forward to it! by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    In all of Ruffy's 14 years, I never could teach her not to piddle on the rug. Now I have a second chance to housetrain her once and for all.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Looking forward to it! by magellen · · Score: 2, Funny

      for $50,000 I could pay a Penthous Pet to piss on the the carpet for me, I'd take pictures and open up a water games website :)

    2. Re:Looking forward to it! by ikkonoishi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The interesting thing is unless they fixed it age degradation transfers over.

      So if your pet died of old age then the clone will die soon as well because it's DNA is a copy of the old dna with the shortened protein buffers around the edges.

      Sexual reproduction solves this by using the redundancy of the two sets of DNA while simpler creatures such as bacteria don't need the hugely complex dna chains of animals and plants.

      Link for more info.

  3. I wonder by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if they can clone my pet bee so I can have a whole Eric-the-bee instead of my Eric-the-half-bee due to his 'accident'.

    --
    Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
    1. Re:I wonder by dsheeks · · Score: 2, Funny

      Great idea. We just need a "Whole Cat/Dog/Bee/etc. Life Insurance Policy". Based on the life expectancy of the cat, (12 years for indoor cat, 6 months for outdoor cat near the Interstate, etc.), they save a few cat cells and collect between $350 and $8333 per month. If the cat dies early, they replace it with an exact replica (minus wear), or if the cat outlives the policy you get to collect dividend payments until the cat kicks off. You could even have a cash payout clause in case it turns out you don't really like the insured cat afterall. Petropolitan Life anyone (sorry for the bad pub).

  4. I tawt I taw a puddy cat... by andreMA · · Score: 3, Funny

    again...

  5. More money than brains I guess by grub · · Score: 5, Insightful


    The technology looks promising but the $50,000 price tag will prove to place the service out of the reach of most pet owners.

    ... and they get a pet that looks like their deceased pet yet isn't. "Mittens 2.0 scratches my furniture, Mittens 1.0 didn't."
    If these people really loved animals and would quit trying to relive the past with a facsimile-pet the $50K (or less) would be better used if donated to a pet shelter for food and sterilization programs. And while they're there they could take home an animal currently on death row.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:More money than brains I guess by grub · · Score: 2, Insightful


      It seems to me that it's just a way to stop the grieving process to some extent

      Sure, it's natural to want to end personal suffering but the wait for the new animal and the eventual letdown of it not being identical to the clonee can't be healthy either. Grief is a natural part of being human. Yes, it sucks and that's why we have so many people medicated now (Feel Good Forever!)

      When my cat (Baby, 13 year old silver tabby I found as a wee kitten) dies, I know I'll be devastated. But having a Baby 2.0 running around isn't the same. I'd pick up another cat once I'm over grieving for her.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:More money than brains I guess by rjstanford · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If these people really loved animals and would quit trying to relive the past with a facsimile-pet the $50K (or less) would be better used if donated to a pet shelter for food and sterilization programs.

      Yeah, they could. Of course, people who loved animals could take the $3000 they spent on a new computer to replace their barely-a-year-old computer and donate it to a pet shelter as well. People spend money. The vast majority of it goes to things that other people think are "wasteful," at least in this country. The only thing that changes is the perspective.

      As to the wisdom of spending $50k on a cat - any cat - I'd say that it depends a lot on your overall financial picture.

      And as for cloning, well, that's another debate entirely. Two debates actually, one on the ethics of it and another one on the effectiveness. Ah, joy.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    3. Re:More money than brains I guess by Richie1984 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure, it's natural to want to end personal suffering but the wait for the new animal and the eventual letdown of it not being identical to the clonee can't be healthy either.

      Exactly. Having Pet Dog V2 running around would just be a constant reminder of V1. Your pet dies, you deal with it. I have lots of pet dogs and it never ever ever gets easier, but death is an important part of life.

      --
      I'm not stressed. I'm just terribly, terribly alert.
    4. Re:More money than brains I guess by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...the $50K (or less) would be better used...

      The odd thing about money is that it follows a conservation principle... it's never destroyed, it just changes form.

      $50k was just liberated from somebody who didn't need it. Half of it went into taxes (on the operation, the materials for the operation, the salaries for the employees etc), the other half was distributed among those who performed the operation.

      You could argue that it was a $50k investment towards the practitioners of vetrenary science, which I'm sure bennefits the rest of society somehow.

      I have no problem with wealthy people spending money on frivilous things. It does bug me though when they spend it on things which hurt everyone else... like gas-guzzling cars, old growth wood, clothes made from slave labour, stuff like that.

      IMHO, the greater harm was done just by creating another cat rather than saving one from a shelter... the $50k is better liberated regardless of how or why... and the harm done isn't that big a deal.

    5. Re:More money than brains I guess by nwbvt · · Score: 2, Informative
      "... and they get a pet that looks like their deceased pet yet isn't. "

      It actually may not even look like their pet. Often appearance is not identical even with clones, such as in calico cats.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    6. Re:More money than brains I guess by FictionPimp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So your saying I need to work at walmart?

    7. Re:More money than brains I guess by Jim+Starx · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That line of logic can be applied to every convenience that we have beyond the basic necessities.

      Do you own a microwave?

      --
      The darkness... controls the music. The music... controls the soul.
  6. Is the RIAA ok with this? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M, created CopyCat"

    Someone better check with the RIAA to make sure that this does not violate the DMCA.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Is the RIAA ok with this? by museumpeace · · Score: 2, Insightful

      its fair to mod this funny but do keep in mind that your PTO grants patents on plants. In particular, plant species newly discovered or produced for the first time by some form of hybridization...so what, other than religous dogma, would keep them from granting patents on strains of cat or dog? The notion of proprietary interest in a particular compliment of genes is established in law and the way breeders try to make money off dogs, cats, goldfish and, of course, race horses pretty well establishes the monitary motivation for those proprietary interests in genetic "Intellectual Property"...go ahead and laugh...That's what many do when they should be scared.

      --
      SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  7. This should solve a dilemma by BJZQ8 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This whole experiment should solve the nature-vs-nurture controversy. The client claims that the cloned cat has the same personality as its donor...but then again, how closely was this one raised to its predecessor?

    1. Re:This should solve a dilemma by jm92956n · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This whole experiment should solve the nature-vs-nurture controversy.

      Identical twins have existed throughout history, and yet the controversy still persists. This is hardly likely to provide any conclusive evidence.

      --
      An effective signature identifies a particular user amongst a base of thousands.
    2. Re:This should solve a dilemma by Bearpaw · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The client claims that the cloned cat has the same personality as its donor...but then again, how closely was this one raised to its predecessor?

      A better question to ask is how delusional the client is.

      Look, my partner I have a cat (or maybe vice-versa). We're damned fond of her, and we like to pretend we understand her, but we're both smart enough to know that our perception of her personality is massively garbled by the fact that we're human and she's not. There is no friggin' way that this woman's claim that Little Nicky's personality is "identical" to Nicky's is anything other than wishful thinking.

      Our cat is dying. When she's dead, we'll miss her, but she will be dead. Even if $50,000 was pocket change to us, we wouldn't clone her because it'd be a really shallow way to treat our memories of her.

  8. $50,000.... by Tebriel · · Score: 3, Funny

    is a lot of money for the "same" pet to piss all over the carpet.

    I'll just go down to the pound and get a pet for $20 to piss all over the carpet, thanks.

    --
    The Blaster Master Fighting for Truth, Justice, and Evil Pie since 1979
  9. Yes, but... by Cutting_Crew · · Score: 2, Insightful

    didnt the lady say that everything about this cat is exactly alike? i imagine as time goes on and as the kitten grows to an adult(assuming the kitten lives that long) then some things will start happening that didnt happen before. i agree with one of the comments that for $50,000 she could have saved a lot of cats from being put to death, but rather found loving caring homes.

  10. Not getting what they pay for - your cat is DEAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    These people are not and never will be ressurecting their loved dead pets. The pet that you loved is DEAD. Go save some pet that is actually still alive and save it from being gassed.

  11. Prosecution by maxchaote · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if this cloning business would eventually result in DNA evidence being inadmissable in court.

  12. Genetic Savings & Clone by Otter · · Score: 5, Funny
    Whatever you think of the business model, that name freaking rocks.

    I mean, it would be stupid in a science fiction story, but to actually operate under that name has to earn some points.

  13. I'm going to enter the equine cloning market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let's see if CopyCat can keep up with PlagiarAss technology.

  14. Inevitably the same by wombatmobile · · Score: 5, Funny

    It'll be the same cat. For the same reason that your girlfriend is turning into her mother.

  15. Mortality by plover · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It's weird that people have become so "undisciplined" that they can't accept death at the end of life. It lives, it breathes, it loves, but eventually it dies. All pets do, all people do. Does it hurt? Of course it does, I've cried so hard at the loss of a pet that I thought I'd never want another out of fear of the pain of the loss in the future. But it hasn't stopped me from getting other pets.

    Anyway, this is still a clone -- it's a different "instance" of the original animal (even if it's made via a copy constructor.) It won't have "genetic memory" of its new owner, it will be a completely different pet. Why spend $50,000? Why not spend $100 at the pound, or a few hundred from a quality breeder, or even a "FREE KITTYS" from a farm?

    I see this as only catering to the clinically insane. The rich, clinically insane, but insane nonetheless. Oh, well, I suppose if there's cash to be made, why not make it? ...

    --
    John
    1. Re:Mortality by scribblej · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think if you look through the history of humankind, you'll find that we haven't "become undisciplined" -- fear and denial of death is something that has existed since the very beginning of recorded history.

      Witness religion, countless billions of men who are so bent on not-dying they've invented fairy tales about how death really isn't.

      As for cloning, I couldn't agree with you more. What you are getting is at best the equivalent of a twin of your old animal. Twins, even identical twins, can be very different people.

    2. Re:Mortality by XPisthenewNT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed! Afterlife is the carrot they dangle to get you to accept religion.

    3. Re:Mortality by yndrd1984 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I see this as only catering to the clinically insane. The rich, clinically insane, but insane nonetheless.

      Yeah, people that buy weird things must be insane. /sarcasm

      Oh, well, I suppose if there's cash to be made, why not make it?

      "Why not indeed!?!" -Bender /humorous quotes

      1. Is this stupider than feeding the original cat caviar three meals a day? It's their money.
      2. "Diciplined" people accept death? I never thought of 'diciplined' and 'wussy' as synonyms.
      3. When vets/genetic researchers/Jurassic Park people use this type of technology to do something good/useful (OK, scratch the JP people), and it's easier/cheaper to do since the businesses already exist, what will you say then?

      Also, this may not be perfect, but why not annoy the Grim Reaper a little, right? :)

      Yndrd1984

    4. Re:Mortality by incom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I had the money, I'd be interested in this FOR the genetic reasons, not some mystical notion of it copying the brain state/ experiences of the animal. Not to mention this funds the advancement of the entire science of cloning, which I find to be a very good thing.

      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
  16. Re:Unethical by KrancHammer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wasn't talking about the wasteful spending. That's none of my business. I am talking about bringing another cat with so much fuss and expense into the world when there are so many unwanted pets in shelters. That's wasteful and a damn shame.

    --
    Trolls: The high-tech version of those morons that scrawl obscenities in public bathrooms.
  17. Re:A hot girl's DNA by plover · · Score: 4, Funny
    and I used this service, would the clone be "owned" by me? Could I force it to have sex with me whenever I wanted?

    Why do you think the first thing the Scottish scientist cloned was a sheep?

    A girrrrllllll sheep...

    This is going to be the best prom EVER!

    --
    John
  18. Re:Looking forward to the spinoff technologies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The customers of these guys are funding our future. Before criticizing them, consider, they're giving us
    • safe and affordable organ transplants from our own cloned tissue
    • endangered species returning.
    • extinct species returning.
    • opportunities for better cheap foods
    • ultimately contributing to our immortality
    Getting cloning out of the hands of a few drug companies who want to profit from the rest of the world's ignorance will create industries and opportunities we can't even imagine today.

    Once the price falls from $50000 to $50, and they clone organs of humans, medicine will never be the same.

  19. But how long will it live? by TrevorB · · Score: 5, Interesting

    OK, cloned cat, nice, but how long will it live?

    People who read about cloning don't realize that the cloned cells have shortened telomeres. The Telomere acts as a cap to protect DNA as its copied. As cells reproduce, the telomere gets shorter and shorter until the DNA isn't protected anymore and you start seeing aging diseases.

    Sure, this cat looks like a kitten, but at a cellular level, it's still an aged cat. It may not have much longer to live than its twin did if it lived out the rest of its natural life.

    This is exactly what happened to Dolly the sheep. Dolly lived to be 6, about half the age of an average sheep.

  20. Symbol of our society by rmpotter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Looks promising", eh?

    No, just another example flagrant consumption -- commodity fetishism at its worst. Even life has a price for those who can afford it. As other have pointed out, $50,000 could have helped relieve a lot of suffering for people and animals alike.

    Looked at another way, its just another example of our society's pathological fear of death. The Egyptians also had an major death fear/fetish and they even mumified their pet cats once in a while -- but at least they buried them!

    And American soldiers are dying by the score to help preserve that way of life. Another sad day for the planet.

    --
    Is this sig nificant?
  21. to all the nay-sayers out there... by dAzED1 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    My wife worked for Dr Westhusian and Dr Kraemer at Texas A&M for the Missyplicity Project. They founded Genetics Savings and Clones with a couple others, but have since split with them. She has played with CC (Carbon Copy...NOT "CopyCat"). Dr Kraemer is the one that has CC, and named her, so...its his call. Argue with him.

    My wife actually cultured the cells that they used for CC. All very cool, and all as a 485 class she was doing for her senior honors thesis (in undergrad!).

    ok, now that that is out of the way...

    My wife is interested in conservation medicine (which she will be studying after finishing her DVM). When she began the actual work that yielded CC, I can tell you she wasn't doing it as a horrible person. When we got the cat we have, we picked one that had been taken back to the pound 3 times, and was going to be killed. However...for the proceedure/technology to be perfected, it needs to be *used*. For us to figure out how to mitigate the cloning problems for the purposes of endangered species, we have to have a large test pool - like people's pets. And if people pay for it, helping offset the research cost - all the better. There just isn't enough real money out there available in grants without commericializing it for supplimental income.

    Just a little background for the teeming masses. Not everyone involved in this stuff are terribly people that ignore the rights of cats and dogs in pounds to have happy homes. Quite contrary, really - my wife could have taken her undergrad degrees and made more with them in human applications than she will after she gets her 2 graduate degrees (DVM and PhD). There's no money in it, for the most part. Most of these people (no, not all) have at least some degree of conservation background.

  22. Not just telomeres, but DNA methylation states by scotay · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Many epigenetic states are also not reproduced because the cloned DNA doesn't go through the normal sexual process. Genetic imprinting (which parent does the expressed gene come from) is believed to be controlled through DNA methylation. Methylation in cloned cells is seen to be different. There are probably other differences we don't even know about. Limited lifespan is only one problem. Abnormally large offspring (possibly due to over-expression of genes) is one of a number of problems seen in clones. We have much to learn and the quest for cloning will help teach, but clones to date have genetic/epigentic states that have never existed in nature and do not go through the normal checks and balances that sexual selection provides.

  23. You're getting confused... by lxt · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Why do you think the first thing the Scottish scientist cloned was a sheep?" ...look, it's the Welsh, not the Scots...the Welsh! :)

    Go on! Mod me flamebait!

  24. Dolly problems by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Informative
    Dolly the cloned sheep was much celebrated, but developed arthritis early ask Google for "dolly arthritis". There is some speculation about this, but one is that the DNA slowly fall apart due to aging and therefore the cloned animal is "pre-aged".

    If this is the case then that kitten you had cloned from your aging cat will start costing a lot in vet bills and will die at an early age.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  25. Re:More ammo for Osama by Moofie · · Score: 3, Funny

    Discrete means that there are separate ones. Discreet means that they keep their mouths shut.

    If they are discreet, you wouldn't know about them, would you?

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  26. Re:Immortality? by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't they say in that movie "Death becomes her" that at the very end of the movie at Dr. Ernest Menville's death, the narrator that he lives on through his progeny?

    I hate that sentement. It's given rise to uncountable generations of children being forced into attempts to live out their parents dreams. I'd find it great if we did live on through our children, but we don't. It'd be even more correct from both a biological, and psychological standpoint to say we live on in surviving siblings. We share much more geneticly with them, and were raised in exactly the same environment. If I took a bullet to the head, it wouldn't give me much comfort to know I had a brother as 'backup' though. Ideas of religious afterlife aside, when you're dead I don't see one living on as anything. You're only living on in the sense that the easter bunny is living on.

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
  27. Re:Immortality? by Bronster · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I took a bullet to the head, it wouldn't give me much comfort to know I had a brother as 'backup' though

    No, but it might give some comfort to your wife ;p

  28. Telomeres by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 2, Informative
    There is a kind of "buffer" at the end of your genetic sequence that slowly decays over your life
    They're called "telomeres".
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana