Slashdot Mirror


Interview with the Frag Dolls

Staci writes "KillerBetties.com, a site with a focus on the female gamer, is running a interview with three of the ladies that comprise the UbiSoft sponsored FragDolls FPS Team. Rhoulette, Jinx and Katscratch sat down with Nicole of KillerBetties to talk about the controversy surrounding their existence and connection with UbiSoft, how they feel about representing female gamers and a few other personal tidbits." From the article: "We wouldn't be the Frag Dolls if it weren't for Ubisoft, so promoting games is certainly a distinct part of what we do. However, all of us have our dreams for where we would like to see girl gamers a year from now. And as girl gamers ourselves, we can't really help but represent some of their interests and desires."

93 comments

  1. Thanks for this interview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Good that they managed to pin down these 3. If they had managed to get a hold of Morgan Webb, they'd have managed to score an interview with every single girl gamer in existence!

  2. I read this ias by ValuJet · · Score: 1, Funny
    Interview with the Fag Dolls

    I thought someone had created a new subdomain porn.slasdot.org.

  3. Dreaming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "However, all of us have our dreams for where we would like to see girl gamers a year from now."

    Wearing bikinis in my living room while playing with big joysticks?

  4. Cute and good at video games? by pnice · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is great and all but the first thing I wanted to do was see pictures off all the girls to see how good looking they are. Wouldn't you know it, they are all very attractive. I know plenty of girls that enjoy playing video games and being cute is not the norm....at least in my experience. The level of expertise a female has in a video game is usually higher the uglier they get. Maybe it's just my limited experience in the area but you won't see me challenging the 275 pound female coworker in a game of Quake. She would destroy me. Now, the cute girl in accounting.....I'll take her on any day.

    1. Re:Cute and good at video games? by pnice · · Score: 1

      .....ok, the point I was making is that all of these girls are good looking....and this was obviously for a reason. Not trying to be a troll or anything.

    2. Re:Cute and good at video games? by Squatchman · · Score: 1

      There are things you say and things better left unsaid.


      More advice on these matters in my book, "Herding Deuces"

    3. Re:Cute and good at video games? by astrokid · · Score: 1

      uh oh, you're '275 pound female coworker' has mod points today.

      --

      Chewie does not get a medal. Come on, George. Can a Wookie get a medal?
    4. Re:Cute and good at video games? by Pluvius · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, you see the same phenomenon in male gamers.

      Rob (By "oddly," I mean "totally expectedly")

    5. Re:Cute and good at video games? by mknewman · · Score: 1

      In regards to playing the cute girl in accounting, the idea is not to beat her. Let her win.

    6. Re:Cute and good at video games? by neonstz · · Score: 1

      She's a wookie?

    7. Re:Cute and good at video games? by Tooxs · · Score: 1

      Bring a razor.

    8. Re:Cute and good at video games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're '275 pound female coworker'

      "your".

  5. Heh... Nice choice of ads... by _xeno_ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't know if anyone else got this ad, but when I pulled up the interview about woman gamers, I got a nice long banner ad for Anarchy Online next to it that read "I Got Implants Baby!", complete with an ingame female character in underwear. Another ad in the corner features the same ingame model, with the text "Play Me!"

    Really goes well with a site "focused on girl gamers." Apparently their advertisers are focused on a certain subset of girl gamers...

    (I'm assuming "I Got Implants Baby!" is a reference to something ingame that I don't get because I don't play the game, but still - it's kind of crude. It's the Internet, I've got other things available to satisfy the "oggling at women" need, that an MMORPG just isn't going to be able to offer. I always wonder about games that try to sell themselves using a hot ingame character - it's like they're trying to distract you with that, to get you to overlook something else, like the fact that the game sucks or something. Makes me wary.)

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    1. Re:Heh... Nice choice of ads... by Mooga · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yes I got the same ad. Freaky as hell...

      --
      ~ Mooga
    2. Re:Heh... Nice choice of ads... by JNighthawk · · Score: 1

      Me too.

      --
      Wheel in the sky keeps on turnin'.
    3. Re:Heh... Nice choice of ads... by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the whole thing is focused on MALE gamers.

      if they wanted to focus on girls they'd get brad pitt or someone... though, it's all about PR and adverts, just think what 'clan' games they could play from bugisoft...

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Heh... Nice choice of ads... by RosethornKB · · Score: 1

      The ads are placeholders -- we aren't in any position yet to sell ads since we just technically launched yesterday. We thought the ads were cute -- a little sexy and very tongue in cheek -- just like me and Nicole. It's supposed to be a fun site. Most women, despite the common opinion, are not offended by scantily clad women.

      --
      Killer Betties - www.killerbetties.com
    5. Re:Heh... Nice choice of ads... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Most women, despite the common opinion, are not offended by scantily clad women.

      There's nothing offensive about scantily clad women.

      But promoting women as simple, sexual objects with unrealistic body proportions to sell a product to stupid men is offensive.

      Many young men are so warped by the fake silicone and false stereotypes they have no idea what a real women is like. Hopefully these men won't breed.

      It's offensive to most women that I know, and it's offensive to me as a man, because the coropations are trying to use sex to manipulate me. Sex is very primal, it is hard to ignore.

    6. Re:Heh... Nice choice of ads... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      but wouldn't women like more of the "brad pitt swinging a sword" look?-)

      they may be not be offended, but they don't usually get aroused either(the bikini girls are damn well focused on male audience)... not to mention that if boobs are the only thing in it, whats the point? it's the internet for christsakes! there's boobs everywhere.

      btw, add some ultra sarcastic black humour...

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:Heh... Nice choice of ads... by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      You have to understand, that every single ad for Anarchy Online I have every seen online was basically "scantily clad woman with Anarchy Online logo" with absolutely nothing to really sell me to the game except the scantily clad woman.

      In fact, I can only guess that it's based on some sort of sci-fi setting soley because there appears to be a spaceship in the background, I actually don't know. The ads have told me nothing about what Anarchy Online is. (I suppose, on looking closer now, that the text "the future in your hands" might also suggest a sci-fi theme, but it's so tiny and under the AO logo, I never actually saw it until now.)

      One of the ads says "The Best Online Game", which means nothing. What genre is it? I happen to know it's an MMORPG because I've heard about it before, but other than that, I might as well have assumed it was a first person shooter.

      There's a difference between "cute" and "gratuitous." The AO ads have struck me as "gratuitous" since, I would assume, scantily clad women are not the main focus of the game. AO seems to use that as a cruch, rather than selling me on, oh, say, the game itself. It really appears that instead of advertising the game, they decided to advertise the character model.

      Having been totally bombarded with those ads on certain websites for completely different MMORPGs, I've gotten really sick of them. It's kind of like this: if your only selling point is scantily clad women, and you're not Hugh Hefner, you need to offer something more. (I'd search for the correct spelling, but I'm at work, and don't want to explain why I'm trying to spell Hugh Hefner correctly.)

      It just seems kind of ironic that on an interview involving women gamers who've been in a controversy where they've been accused of being nothing but booth babes, who are using sex to try and attract people to Ubisoft, that there would be ads that involve a campaign that is actively using a "game babe," if you will, to try and attract people to an online game.

      Besides, everyone knows that the girls in FFXI were cuter. :P

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    8. Re:Heh... Nice choice of ads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no because I use PithHelmet for Safari, and all that remains are those flash ads on /.
      There are thousands and thousands of ads that I have not seen, according to the logs.

    9. Re:Heh... Nice choice of ads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry you have such a guilt complex. Who cares if people have unrealistic expectations? Big deal. It means those men who ARE nice guys will get the women who ARE nice chicks, leaving the superficial fucks to rot in one another's arms. Big deal. So sex sells, so enjoy it. Jeez.

    10. Re:Heh... Nice choice of ads... by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      I think the offense comes because it's a rather crude form of "bait and switch." Presumably most ads using scantily clad women aren't actually selling scantily clad women, they're selling some form of product that isn't a scantily clad woman. It's kind of like "ignore all rational thought about our product, and just follow the bouncing boobs."

      There's nothing wrong with scantily clad women. There's nothing wrong with scantily clad women in games. There's something wrong with the many advertising campaigns that appear to be "watch the dancing lady!" instead of trying to appeal to some form of rational thought, like "you'll enjoy playing the game." (Or, "you'll enjoy watching a show about a talking meatball, milkshake, and fries" instead of "watch this lady dance in the background while some old guy says the words to the opening song.")

      I mean, I don't mind when Leasure Suit Larry advertises with lots of pictures of scantily clad women and little else, because that's a fair representation of the game, but presumably there's something else to do in Anarchy Online than stare at a female character model...

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    11. Re:Heh... Nice choice of ads... by RosethornKB · · Score: 1

      You are right. Unfortunately -- ads that are sexual in nature have a better performance and get more attention than your normal run of the mill ad. It may not be the the moral route, but it gets results and that is why a lot of companies use them. They do what works and its a statement about our society that ads that are sexual in nature work not about the nature of the companies using the ads. The average gaming site (say like Warcry or IGN) has about 10% of its viewing audience as female. That means 90% male. With an audience so male skewed, ads of a sexual nature work really well. Of the 10% audience that is female, most will click on an ad of sexual nature as well, since women who game tend to be a little different from your average woman. There may be some men who claim they would be offended and not click on ads of a sexual nature, but experience and statistics says that these men are the extreme minority unfortunately. Until ads like this stop working, I don't expect them to go away. I'm not bothered by them as a female either, so *shrug* Hey, they get my attention and I'm straight as an arrow.

      --
      Killer Betties - www.killerbetties.com
    12. Re:Heh... Nice choice of ads... by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      No Brad Pitt here, but the 6'+ tall scotsmen (the maestro and I) swinging swords tended to get a lot of people interested in joining. Most of them were female. go figure =]

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    13. Re:Heh... Nice choice of ads... by patternjuggler · · Score: 1

      It's the Internet, I've got other things available to satisfy the "oggling at women" need

      This is a recurring argument of the form "If I wanted X then I would do Y, which contains X in a very concentrated form, why would anyone want Z which has much less?" The answer is some people like X, but will get in trouble with their parents or wives or their own sense of self-respect so they want it at a low concentration in another format that may have other redeeming qualities.

    14. Re:Heh... Nice choice of ads... by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      It's the Internet. I'm sure you can find something out there to satisfy the need that isn't an ad for an MMORPG. Besides, as I mentioned in another post, other MMORPGs have cuter character models to oggle at anyway. :P

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    15. Re:Heh... Nice choice of ads... by Riddlefox · · Score: 1
      This is nothing new. Do you remember the ads for the game Forsaken? There was absolutely nothing about the game in the ads. Was it a FPS? An RPG? A RTS? Who knows?! (As it turns out, the game was a Descent clone).

      All the ads showed was a very pretty lady with a tattoo that said "Forsaken" in front of a desolate background. Various ads would show various parts of her body (face, tummy, and so on). I'm sure you could google the ads if you felt like it. IIRC, even the box for the game showed the Forsaken girl.

    16. Re:Heh... Nice choice of ads... by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      And this might be a reason why, even after finding images of the game on Amazon.com and remembering the ads, I could not have told you anything about it. Those type of marketing campaigns don't work if you don't also provide information about what the product is. It might draw attention to the ad, but that's about it.

      Sex alone doesn't sell anything... A sexy girl playing the game might help sell the game (which is probably Ubisoft's hope), but just a sexy girl and nothing else but the title doesn't quite cut it.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  6. What a coincidence by gmhowell · · Score: 2

    What a coincidence. All of them have good skin, large boobs, and fairly trim wastes. Am I the only one who thinks there is at least a bit of Milli Vanilli or Backstreet Boys to this group? Do they have anything to do with girls in gaming, or just to get pimply nerds even more hot and bothered than Lara or DOA?

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    1. Re:What a coincidence by Squatchman · · Score: 1

      It's probably all the low-impact aerobics.

    2. Re:What a coincidence by Fr05t · · Score: 1

      Since when does being attractive or not affect gaming skills? First off they have been doing very well (90%+ win rate), and second if you actually took the time to read the interview you'd see they aren't a bunch of airheads. Shesh no wonder so many female gamers pretend to be male online when there are people with your great insight around.

    3. Re:What a coincidence by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Again, reading comprehension skills lacking on slashdot.

      Why are there *only* attractive females in the group? Surely there's some trollish females out there with mad 733+ gaming skillz.

      Then again, you probably think drinking Bud Light will get you all the women as well...

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    4. Re:What a coincidence by Fr05t · · Score: 1

      No I read it just fine.

      "What a coincidence. All of them have good skin, large boobs, and fairly trim wastes. Am I the only one who thinks there is at least a bit of Milli Vanilli or Backstreet Boys to this group?"

      You said they are attractive, then implied their skills are fake. Although you didn't outright say "they are attractive so they obviously aren't real gamers" it was pretty clear it was what you were getting at. This is just plain ignorance about their group.

      "Do they have anything to do with girls in gaming, or just to get pimply nerds even more hot and bothered than Lara or DOA?"

      Of course they have something to do with girls in gaming. They are a) girls and b) gamers. Seems like a no brainer.

      On the second poin - I don't think too many pimply nerds (yet another stereotype, you are just full of them) get hot and bothered over a girl kicking their ass in a FPS.

      If your point was that not all female gamers are hot, you didn't clearly state it until this reply and I don't think it was your intention from the start anyhow. What it comes down to is yes they are sponsored sooo they are going to be nice to look at. No different from any other marketing in the world, but as I said that's not what you were saying in your original post.

      When I drink Bud Light my girlfriend keeps a close eye on me so she can fend off all of the beer girls.

    5. Re:What a coincidence by vhold · · Score: 1

      No, I think he read it quite correctly.

      "Am I the only one who thinks there is at least a bit of Milli Vanilli or Backstreet Boys to this group? Do they have anything to do with girls in gaming, ... "

      You are implying that they aren't really playing their own games are you not? Because Milli Vanilli and the Backstreet Boys lipsync their performances? What other analogy could there be there? Heck, that doesn't even matter, if you question whether or not they have anything to do with girls in gaming, you are directly saying they aren't gamers at all.

      Your new, more valid, point of there being no unattractive females in the group is -entirely- seperate from your original point that these girls are probably not real gamers. This is the debate equivalent of a bait and switch with a bonus serving of two personal attacks.

    6. Re:What a coincidence by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No different from any other marketing in the world,

      But this is very different from most other clans and other FPS teams. Most clans and FPS teams aren't a marketing campaign ...

      It really seems like this is a Marketing Campaign-- a "New Kids on the Block" kind of clan.

      Ubisoft wanted a guerilla advertising campaign targeted at young male gamers, so they hired 8 pretty girls to form a clan. It's not very authentic. Using sex to advertise a product is all too common.

    7. Re:What a coincidence by Fr05t · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but you just sound intimidated. Any sponsored team of any kind (gaming or none) is marketing. It's not like they just show up at the events and look pretty. They are there to compete just like any other team. Just because they don't 'look like the others' doesn't mean crap. Part of the reason this is a good thing is to show other girls that they can play games and compete even though fucktards with more ego than skill will claim they are just a PR stunt and have no talent. Seriously though it's not like they are faking it! I bet any one of them would clean your clock in Halo or Splinter Cell.

    8. Re:What a coincidence by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't play FPS very often, and I don't actually play many computer games on my 1997-era PC. I'm too cheap to buy a gaming computer.

      I'm sure these women can play games and that they are pretty decent, but it's pretty obvious that the concept of the 'Frag Dolls' is a PR campaign first, and a gaming clan second.

      It's about attracting male gamers to the Ubisoft product line. They are booth babes who are good at video games. It's manufactured group, just like the Bud girls and Britany Spears. They are using sex to manipulate you.

      If the FragDolls were about Gaming first, and marketing second. then you might see more pictures of the ladies playing games, instead of sitting there looking pretty. Do you even see a video game in this lady's profile? What does her eye and hair color have to do with her gaming ability?

    9. Re:What a coincidence by Pluvius · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are implying that they aren't really playing their own games are you not? Because Milli Vanilli and the Backstreet Boys lipsync their performances? What other analogy could there be there?

      While Milli Vanilli was indeed fake, the Backstreet Boys is a group of five talented singers (even if you don't like their music, you have to admit this) who were artifically brought together by corporate interests to appeal to the teeniebopper market. I think that was the main point that he was trying to make.

      BTW, I have to wonder how much of their impressive win rate has to do with the unwashed nerds that they're playing against hyperventilating and screaming "OMG GURLZ!!!" How many games do they play where the opponents can't see each other?

      Heck, that doesn't even matter, if you question whether or not they have anything to do with girls in gaming, you are directly saying they aren't gamers at all.

      Not necessarily. I think it would be valid to suggest that the media (as well as the aforementioned corporate interests) isn't interested in this group because it's an example of girls in gaming, but because it's an example of hot girls in gaming. In other words, this doesn't really have anything to do with gamer girls in general.

      Rob

    10. Re:What a coincidence by Mooga · · Score: 1
      I don't know if your computer is having problems or if they edited it but I see:

      Favorite Game Genres: MMORPG, RPG, and Action

      Favorite Games: Shadowbane, EverQuest, Splinter Cell, Final Fantasy VII, Baldur's Gate II, KOTOR

      --
      ~ Mooga
    11. Re:What a coincidence by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry, I was unclear. I meant to say "In her gallery, do you see any pictures of her playing video games"...

      My bad.

      I'm sure she plays video games, but the focus is on her good looks and curly red hair. If this is truely about video games, then where are the action shots of her playing video games?

    12. Re:What a coincidence by Fr05t · · Score: 1

      If you look under the gallery section there are some pics of them playing with linked Gameboys.

    13. Re:What a coincidence by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      If you look at Gap's advertisement, you'll see Sarah Jessica Parker wearing Gap clothing. But that doesn't mean that she really wears Gap clothing in real life.

      It's advertising.

    14. Re:What a coincidence by Fr05t · · Score: 1

      the sponsor isn't nintendo.

    15. Re:What a coincidence by Kargan · · Score: 1

      Right here:

      http://www.fragdolls.com/profile.php?doll=katscr at ch

      Well, there's one, anyway.

      --
      Palaces, barricades, threats, meet promises
    16. Re:What a coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh right I forgot, I play video games therefore I'm a dork with no life and zits. These girls are good looking so they must not be able to frag the side of a barn. Please. Video games are mainstream now not so much of a fringe hobby. Lots of different people play video games and enjoy them. Pretty people, ugly people, fat or thin- you name it. If teams like these girls are a big hit, it's possible that someday you or I could earn some scratch for fragging.

    17. Re:What a coincidence by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I play games, but:

      it's possible that someday you or I could earn some scratch for fragging.

      The only way I'd earn money fragging is the same way William Hung won money singing.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  7. Actually... by Kumorigoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...my wife is a far better gamer on some genres than I, and I've been gaming for a while. She can't play Gran Turismo to save her life, but put her in a CS match and watch the frags pile up. I think that a lot of girl gamers are just afraid to come out and say that they like games, because it might attract guys like us.

    --
    "What I cary in this box is your utter subjugation."
    1. Re:Actually... by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      I find it genetically impossible that girls are created to NOT like video games. No way in hell, any genes can be responsible for that. They are just not coming out. Which is ashame.

    2. Re:Actually... by vhold · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I really don't see how you can so easily disregard the possibility that genes, or at least in someway, gender, has something to do with liking video games.

      My mom used to believe that all behavior was nurture, and not nature, until she became a preschool teacher. 10 years of 3 and 4 year old boys turning absolutely everything into a gun and girls turning everything into a doll house kinda wears down those lofty notions. Even if it is still is nurture based on some really complex societal stuff, the practical upshot remains, an obvious behavior difference tied to gender.

      I admit this is a totally subjective observation, but boys seem more drawn to clear cut competition with well defined winners and losers whereas while girls can be very competitive, it tends to be much more subtle and indirect. To me that's the most obvious reason video games seem so much more likely to appeal to men. "YOU LOSE" "YOU WIN" It just seems to be attached to an emotional hair trigger in the male pysche. Games that purposely defy that rigid convention are more likely to appeal to women in my opinion, The Sims being a fairly obvious example.

  8. Corporate shills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you're sponsored by Ubisoft and you tell the interviewer that your favorite game of all time is Splinter Cell, you lose any credibility as a serious gamer. These girls are like Duffman; they're paid to raise awareness of Ubisoft by playing Ubisoft games at Ubisoft-sponsored events. They may be living the "pro gamer" life now, but in 2 years when we all decide we don't give a shit about competitive gaming any more, they'll be out on their asses and Ubisoft will go back to advertising in magazines.

    Besides... Console FPS games? Puh-lease.

    Now the all-girl Quake clans that started up without corporate guidance, on the other hand... hot-cha-cha.

    1. Re:Corporate shills by Squatchman · · Score: 1

      So it's beyond consideration that there exists a person who thinks that Splinter Cell is a great game?(It is)

      What's wrong with First-person Shooters on consoles?

    2. Re:Corporate shills by hollismb · · Score: 1

      Oh crap, here comes the keyboard/mouse debate again. Yes, yes, we all know. Please spare us.

    3. Re:Corporate shills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      So it's beyond consideration that there exists a person who thinks that Splinter Cell is a great game?(It is)

      Splinter Cell may be good (subjective) but there's no fucking way it should ever be anybody's favorite game of all time. Shit, it doesn't even make the top 100 lists. Ever. Making that claim is spurious enough without adding the fact that these people are being subsidized by Ubisoft to play games. If the check was big enough, I'm sure they'd say the Dukes of Hazzard game was their favorite game of all time.

      What's wrong with First-person Shooters on consoles?

      The horrid controller, the limited maps, the limited number of players, the crappy framerate on a tv set... all this has been covered on /. about a thousand times by now.

    4. Re:Corporate shills by limekiller4 · · Score: 1

      An AC (aren't they all?) writes:
      When you're sponsored by Ubisoft and you tell the interviewer that your favorite game of all time is Splinter Cell, you lose any credibility as a serious gamer.

      What you say may very well be true but I also rank Splinter Cell as one of the best titles I've ever played.

      Just 'cuz someone likes a title you don't doesn't necessarily make them a shill.

      --
      My .02,
      Limekiller
    5. Re:Corporate shills by Squatchman · · Score: 1

      Yay for opinions!!

    6. Re:Corporate shills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An AC (aren't they all?) writes:

      And the AC wrote in complete sentences, spelled everything correctly, and didn't call anybody a cocksucker. Your point?

      "When you're sponsored by Ubisoft and you tell the interviewer that your favorite game of all time is Splinter Cell, you lose any credibility as a serious gamer."

      What you say may very well be true but I also rank Splinter Cell as one of the best titles I've ever played.


      How many have you played? What are some of your other favorite games of all time? How many hours a day/week/month do you play games?

      Just 'cuz someone likes a title you don't doesn't necessarily make them a shill.

      Where did I say that? They're shills because they WORK FOR UBISOFT. What's so hard to understand about that?

    7. Re:Corporate shills by vhold · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some people think Scary Movie 2 is the greatest movie of all time. You realize that calling a game your favorite is -entirely- subjective right? No top 100 list neccesarily has anything to do with that.

      Having said that, I agree that it's pretty obvious that particular choice would seem rather heavily affected by their status as being sponsored by Ubisoft. But at least Splinter Cell is indeed actually a very good game, the true total shill would have promoted their most underperforming game. Heck, who's to say that the cause and effect relationship isn't actually in reverse? Wouldn't being a preexisting Ubisoft fangirl make her more likely to end up becoming sponsored by them?

    8. Re:Corporate shills by limekiller4 · · Score: 1

      An AC -- likely the same one -- writes:
      "And the AC wrote in complete sentences, spelled everything correctly, and didn't call anybody a cocksucker. Your point?"

      Uh oh. A grammar nazi.

      I wrote:
      "What you say may very well be true but I also rank Splinter Cell as one of the best titles I've ever played."

      The AC replied:
      "How many have you played? What are some of your other favorite games of all time? How many hours a day/week/month do you play games?"

      Not only a grammar nazi but working the ad hominem simultaneously. Nice!

      How many: Since the late 80's on a PC, I'd guess I average about five to eight games a year, so maybe a hundred, give or take thirty. I find one I like and then I stick with it until I get bored.

      Favorites: Planetside, Siphon Filter, America's Army, Rogue Spear. Max Payne 2. Deux Ex. Those were all good, IMO. Some had colossal flaws, but I enjoyed them.

      How often: Ranging anywhere from 12-14 hour streches to going days without touching. Depends on what other committments I have.

      But, of course, this has nothing at all to do with the issue at hand and your misdirection is noted.

      Maybe you've heard of an arcade game called "The Outfoxies." I consider it to be the most entertaining fighters ever made. Remember "Baseball Stars" for the NES? I love that one too, but the critics generally considered it just-above-average. In fact I'm in the middle of a season now.

      Most people would not think very much of these two games. According to your logic, if I was employed by the companies that produced this software and I made the same statement, my credibility would be lost as a gamer.

      Huh?

      I wrote:
      "Just 'cuz someone likes a title you don't doesn't necessarily make them a shill."

      The AC replied:
      "Where did I say that?"

      Wait. Earlier you wrote "the AC wrote" (implying someone other than you) and here you ask "Where did I say that?"

      Wups. You wanted to sound like some random Joe coming to the defense of the AC. Ever hear of "astroturfing?"

      The AC ends with:
      "They're shills because they WORK FOR UBISOFT. What's so hard to understand about that?"

      You called them shills (which they are) but that's not all you said.

      What you -- yes, you -- originally wrote is:
      "When you're sponsored by Ubisoft and you tell the interviewer that your favorite game of all time is Splinter Cell, you lose any credibility as a serious gamer."

      The implication being that if they weren't employed by Ubi, they wouldn't have this opinion. In other words, you're calling them liars.

      Maybe, but maybe not, and you generally want to have some evidence that someone is intentially lying before you call them one. It's possible someone thinks quite highly of a game you don't have much regard for. Calling them a liar based on that fact alone is silly.

      --
      My .02,
      Limekiller
    9. Re:Corporate shills by Squatchman · · Score: 1

      Anyone who works and in turn supports the company they work for is now considered to be less credible than the next. All the hardcore people are talking trash about the companies they work for anyway.

      Enjoy living out of some relative's garage/basement.

      As well, the value of anyone's opinion is the same as the next. I'm free to state my belief that Mavis Beacon Teaches Typing is a better title than whatever your favourite first person shooter is, and you have no place in telling me that I'm wrong. (Imagine that) The minute I try to state it as fact is when you can blow your imaginary whistle.

    10. Re:Corporate shills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An AC -- likely the same one -- writes:
      "And the AC wrote in complete sentences, spelled everything correctly, and didn't call anybody a cocksucker. Your point?"

      Uh oh. A grammar nazi.


      Yes, I'm the same AC throughout. My point was that you're blithely dismissing anything anybody says if they haven't bothered to create an account. It's precisely this attitude that prevents me from bothering to create an account.

      Also, that would be one ad hominem comment from YOU. I wasn't being a grammar nazi, just pointing out that not every AC is trolling for the GNAA.

      I wrote:
      "What you say may very well be true but I also rank Splinter Cell as one of the best titles I've ever played."

      The AC replied:
      "How many have you played? What are some of your other favorite games of all time? How many hours a day/week/month do you play games?"

      Not only a grammar nazi but working the ad hominem simultaneously. Nice!


      Actually, I was simply calling for clarification. For all I knew, you played exactly 2 games in your life and Splinter Cell happened to be the better one. But don't let that stop you from jumping to conclusions.

      How many: Since the late 80's on a PC, I'd guess I average about five to eight games a year, so maybe a hundred, give or take thirty. I find one I like and then I stick with it until I get bored.

      So, not many at all, really. What you play in a year, I play in a week.

      Favorites: Planetside, Siphon Filter, America's Army, Rogue Spear. Max Payne 2. Deux Ex. Those were all good, IMO. Some had colossal flaws, but I enjoyed them.

      Sounds like you've picked a favorite genre.

      But, of course, this has nothing at all to do with the issue at hand and your misdirection is noted.

      Uh-huh. I don't know you but I'm betting you've never let facts interfere with a good argument.

      Maybe you've heard of an arcade game called "The Outfoxies." I consider it to be the most entertaining fighters ever made. Remember "Baseball Stars" for the NES? I love that one too, but the critics generally considered it just-above-average. In fact I'm in the middle of a season now.

      What were you saying about misdirection?

      Most people would not think very much of these two games. According to your logic, if I was employed by the companies that produced this software and I made the same statement, my credibility would be lost as a gamer.

      A more apt comparison would be if you were hired by a company because you were cute and perky, and your responsibilities included showing up at trade shows to demonstrate the company's products, your credibility (particularly your objectivity) would be in question. But please, feel free to put more words in my mouth. You seem very practiced at it.

      I wrote:
      "Just 'cuz someone likes a title you don't doesn't necessarily make them a shill."

      The AC replied:
      "Where did I say that?"

      Wait. Earlier you wrote "the AC wrote" (implying someone other than you) and here you ask "Where did I say that?"

      Wups. You wanted to sound like some random Joe coming to the defense of the AC. Ever hear of "astroturfing?"


      Funny you should mention astroturfing, because that is EXACTLY what these Ubisoft employees are doing.

      As for the other part; your accusation rests solely on the assumption that I was attempting to trick you. I was not. My intention, again, was to show this contempt people have for anonymous posting for what it is; prejudice.

      The AC ends with:
      "They're shills because they WORK FOR UBISOFT. What's so hard to understand about that?"

      You called them shills (which they are) but that's not all you said.

      What you -- yes, you -- originally wrote is:
      "When you're sponsored by Ubisoft and you tell the interviewer that your favorite game of all time is Splinter Cell, you lose any credibility as a serious gamer."

      The implication being tha

    11. Re:Corporate shills by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      First: He didn't correct your grammar. How was the AC a grammar nazi?

      Second: I found it convenient that Splinter Cell showed up on nearly all of their 'Favorite Game' lists. Apparently they all love their Sam Fisher!

      I have a very accurate and sensitive bullshit meter. The stuff that these girls write doesn't come off as bullshit. However, I just can't believe that that many gamers who supposedly have a variety of tastes would list Splinter Cell as one of their all-time favorites. Splinter cell just *isn't* that good. It's like grabbing a group of 10 random people and having 8 of them say that Armageddon was their favorite movie.

      Third: Your quoting style is entirely unnecessary. The parent/grandparent posts are back there for anyone who wants to read them. We don't need a play-by-play.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    12. Re:Corporate shills by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Wrong. The true total shill would promote whatever big hit Ubi had out, thus adding to its marketplace dominance and guaranteeing a future of sequels. Remember, thats where the real money is at. Nobody wastes their time trying to prop up the losers.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    13. Re:Corporate shills by vhold · · Score: 1

      I suppose from a practical perspective that's how you'd use star power, but when I think of the word shill I guess I'm picturing somebody who is -totally- lying. I see Splinter Cell as being a good enough of a game that I can imagine it being a person's favorite game, I mean, it was my favorite game while I was playing it, otherwise I'd have been playing a different game instead most of the time.

      When I think shill, I'm picturing the guy who is in coherts with the shell game guy on the street, basically a total dupe. I picture Krusty the Clown eating a Krusty burger for an ad and then spitting it out after the camera turns off. Just to me anyways, the word shill is such an extreme categorization that it should be reserved for instances of total deceit.

    14. Re:Corporate shills by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      you have no place telling me that I'm wrong... Did you just preemptively tell everybody, that they are wrong? Or are you saying that having an opinion about someone else's opinion is wrong? Oh, the irony of it all just kills me

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    15. Re:Corporate shills by Squatchman · · Score: 1

      excellent!

      I suppose if you state your opinion about my opinion as an opinion and not as a fact. Then you are, in fact, using my own logic against me.

      I think I'm safe against that in this thread though.

  9. But do they have skill? by theclam159 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I heard someone saying that they really aren't very good at FPS at all. They really don't deserve the title "FragDolls" unless they can go into the average CS/UT2003/BF1942/whatever server and rack up the kills.

    1. Re:But do they have skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      I heard someone say that you're stupid. You really shouldn't be allowed to post to Slashdot unless you can show that you have some intelligence.

      Compelling argument, isn't it?

  10. It's Anarchy Online... by madgeorge · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You are wise to be wary. BTW, "I've got implants" refers to the in-game ability to increase your stats and abilities with mods that can be crafted, bought or that drop off various baddies in the universe. And AO has been using the same crass advertising ever since they lost a million subscribers after launch because they overhyped and WAY under-delivered. I was one they lost, and I never went back. I've heard it's better, but I don't really care.

  11. A friend made this point by Pluvius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Mentioning the 95% win rate doesn't mean anything unless you also mention who they play against. Does anyone know if these girls play against people who aren't chumps?

    Rob

    1. Re:A friend made this point by Mooga · · Score: 1
      Who says they even play often? We know that they practice often (or atleast they say they do). Can it be that they've only played a few games, say 5 and happened to win 4 because everyone else were n00bs?

      There are lots of games out there who enjoy it but suck... could they have been lucky or am I just giving them a hard time because they're woman?

      ... Probably the last :-X

      --
      ~ Mooga
    2. Re:A friend made this point by Twister002 · · Score: 1

      They were at the Penny Arcade Expo and won every game they played there. I can't imagine a bunch of chumps showing up at a Penny Arcade expo and playing against girls in public.

      --
      "For a successful technology, honesty must take precedence over public relations for nature cannot be fooled." -Feynman
    3. Re:A friend made this point by ll1234 · · Score: 1

      I hear the guys at Bungie aren't too shabby at this here Halo 2 game. Bungie came out 3-0 against the Frag Dolls but it was a close 3-0 (50-26, 50-49, 50-45) and not a total whomping.

      Halo Humpday Challenge

  12. Fancy Website by Mooga · · Score: 1

    that is quite a fancy website for a brand new clan. It's obveus that Ubi made the site and paid for it. A few random female games don't pull a site like that out of nowhere. Heck, me being a guy I couldn't pull that site out if you gave me 6 months.

    --
    ~ Mooga
    1. Re:Fancy Website by ChrisReid · · Score: 1

      To be fair, this isn't the first time they've appeared. I saw them hyping Rainbow Six BA and Ghost Recon 2 at the Penny Arcade Expo back in August.

    2. Re:Fancy Website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm - yeah, of course Ubi made thier website. Afterall, we all know that they are sponsored. BTW - these sorts of things don't generally go so long on the main page without a tiny bit of dirt digging - so here it is:

      # nslookup fragdolls.com
      Name: fragdolls.com
      Address: 216.98.48.7

      # nslookup ubisoft.com
      Name: ubisoft.com
      Address: 216.98.48.7

      Need any more proof than that?

  13. PR by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    This is pretty disgusting as a PR move. I hope everybody takes the time to contact these girls and let them know how they feel about being manipulated like that.

    Frankly, I think its pretty telling that there ARE NO UGLY FRAG DOLLS. Real game girls run the gamut from 3-10 in terms of looks, and the fact that these are all near model hotness girls says a lot.

    If anybody from Ubisoft is reading this, I will be taking this PR move into consideration next time I am in the market for a video game, or when a friend asks for a recommendation.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  14. These girls as role models? by Fricka · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Awenyddion: From a woman's standpoint, being so visible in the gaming industry, you are being viewed as role models for women gamers everywhere."

    This makes me sad. Why? Let's take them at their word that they are great gamers and are "so visible". Then I'll take it on the other /. posters' words that they are all good looking (I didn't see any pics).

    Where does that leave us girl gamers? I'll tell you where -- in yet another area of interest where you have to not only be good at what you do but you also have to look like models as well. If these girls are supposed to be role models than what their sponsors are saying is that it's not enough to be good at games, but you have to look like "Booth Babes" as well. Only then will you be allowed on our team.

    Geekland was the last hold out where a guy might actually like you for your brains as much as for your beauty. I'd like to see it stay that way.

    --
    ~Fricka
    OffLineTshirts.com
    1. Re:These girls as role models? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. Some (most?) geeks are still very attracted to brainy girls, but I'll admit that beauty still plays a big part.

      Personally, I like intelligent, chess-playing, beer-drinking girls, and I've found that I am very, very attracted by 'quirky'-looking females. A cute face with a playful gleam in the eye, perhaps a few freckles and a cute smile is infinitely more attractive than the IMO boring standard "look at me, I'm a model" look.

      I'm sure I share this preference with many, many other geeks.

      Don't worry about it. Really. You're intelligent. You're a geek girl. You rock by definition. The odds are in your favour.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    2. Re:These girls as role models? by Fricka · · Score: 1

      You Sir, have given me hope.

      Hail to the Geeks!

      --
      ~Fricka
      OffLineTshirts.com
    3. Re:These girls as role models? by RosethornKB · · Score: 1

      As a geeky, relatively plain looking woman myself -- I'm as threatened by the Frag Dolls as I am by the Booth Babes at E3. Which means not at all. Perhaps I'm more secure in myself than others (and maybe its because I'm off the market?) but they don't bother me on that level. Course, were I on the market, I know I would have no shortage of bidders.

      --
      Killer Betties - www.killerbetties.com
    4. Re:These girls as role models? by Fricka · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean to imply that I personally felt threatened, nor that other geek girls should feel that way.

      My "sadness" was for for the state of affairs: Gaming companies feeling that to sponsor a female team the members of said team would have to be good gamers AND be of Booth Babe looks. If anyone should be "role models" it should be females like yourself.

      --
      ~Fricka
      OffLineTshirts.com
    5. Re:These girls as role models? by RosethornKB · · Score: 1

      Well UbiSoft brought together these girls to be more than just a clan. They are supposed to help market UbiSoft's games and, as such, are spokesmodels as much as gamers. They just happen to be able to kiss ass. It's an interesting marketing attempt and it's doing pretty well for them, although maybe not for what they had hoped. I was told that UbiSoft already has the male audience -- this was to try to bring in the female audience. Maybe thats what is being said now to justify them, I don't know. If that was their purpose, they haven't gone the right way with it, though. Unfortunately -- bringing in the female audience would be better done with a group of good looking guys women could beat, if the marketing were done correctly. But this goes again to the predominantly male dominated market not truly understanding women -- and the few women in the market are perhaps too out of touch with the average woman to be useful. I often wonder if sometimes, no matter how I might try, it would be impossible for me because of the way I am to truly represent females.

      --
      Killer Betties - www.killerbetties.com
    6. Re:These girls as role models? by RosethornKB · · Score: 1

      kick ass i meant, not kiss ass /me sighs

      --
      Killer Betties - www.killerbetties.com
    7. Re:These girls as role models? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      You're welcome.

      Now, if only I could find a geeky, funky, chess-playin', beer-drinkin' girlfriend for myself...

      She's got to be out there somewhere, waiting. I hope.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  15. amateurs by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

    Awenyddion: How often do you practice together?

    Katscratch: depends on if we are in competition mode or not. Now we are practicing 3-5 times a week together

    Rhoulette: It depends, but we try to get up to 10 hours of team practice in a week.


    3-5 times a week, for a total of 10 hours? and they are supposedly competitve gamers? weaksauce. i play games pretty much daily, and on a slow saturday i can put in 10 hours on that day alone.

    hmm, looks like all i need is a bra, a box of tissues, a blonde wig and a shave and i'm set. oh yeah, and a list of recent Ubisoft releases so i know what games to put in my 'favourite games' list. GHOST RECON 2 ROOLS!!! IT'S IMPROVED ON THE PC ORIGINAL IN EVERY WAY!!!1!

    1. Re:amateurs by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      They said that's how long they practice as a team. It says nothing about how long they play by themselves. As far as recent releases goes, Jinx lists American McGee's Alice as one of her favorites (and that's several years old).

      The amusing thing is what caught my attention about her. She lists Perl as one of her obsessions (that and her music and movies lists. It's pretty safe to say that she actually is a geek).

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
  16. dateing by crazy_pikachu · · Score: 1

    so do you think it would be a good thing to date one of these chicks beacause if you do your house will be a mess and both of us will never get anything done. I want to be the one playing the games and I will have her bethe one that does the dishes. man I hope they can cook too

  17. Hmmm by GweiLeong · · Score: 1

    We have the Fragdolls, an obviously corporate tossed together group of women who seem to be decent gamers (and of course, eye candy).

    They're in the 18 - under 30 age range, probably have student loans, etc to pay off, know their looks won't last forever and have been tossed together into a corporate sponsored clan.

    It's easy for people to post (Corporate whore!1!!!111) and say they wouldn't take the money to be Ubisoft's marketing eye candy (something akin to BoothBabe+).

    Let's face it, marketing has done the "corporate" formula before to great success (Morning Musume in Japan, New Kids On The Block, etc). Should anyone really be surprised that they used this in gaming?

    Are there non-photoshopped non 38D girl gaming clans who deserve a lot more attention than the FDs? Of course. Are these girls role models? Mmmm, it depends on what the girls viewing this want. The fact is, the majority of gamers are male and if you happen to be both a gamer and female (and hot) you could likely find 20 companies willing to toss you the same type of deal the Fragdolls got.

    There's nothing saying girls can't be successful at gaming. At the first LAN party I ever got taken to I went to take a break from BF1942 (snack machine trip) and passing by the CS room there was a girl (bout 16) in there PWNING the guys at CS.

    To wrap up I guess what I'm trying to say is that while I support women standing up for themselves and saying "hey dammit, we've got as much game as you guys do!", I would rather see the attention pointed at your average gaming girl (maybe not the hottest woman on the planet, but lots of skill) than corporate sellouts. And yes, I'll probably get flamed, and yes I likely would have taken the money too had I been in the same situation (free games + professional website + money + etc etc etc). That doesn't mean I have to respect it.