Slashdot Mirror


Cybernetic Prosthetics for Amputees

A. J. Perkins writes "Returning amputees from Iraq are getting computer-driven artifical limbs allowing greater balance and mobility. These futuristic limbs have hydraulic pumps visible through its clear plastic shell. They are loaded with an on-board CPU and rechargable batteries. The Utah3 Arm, which allows simultaneous motion in the elbow, hand and wrist, offering movement old prosthetics could not. These are coupled with the SensorSpeedHand, which has electronic sensors in the fingertips that make it easier to grip objects. The C-Leg monitors motion 50 times per second to assist with balance."

252 comments

  1. Hm... by Fjornir · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will this come in time to save us from the terrible secret of space?

    --
    I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    1. Re:Hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Only if you can install linux on it, and thus harnessing the power of the prostetic component for SETI @ home calculations. Imagine all the prostetics CPU power to be used in the 70% idle time they provide.

      Im not going to mention convergance and beowulf clusters as an application for this. Even if...

    2. Re:Hm... by Irashtar · · Score: 0

      if you don't install linux, you will turn blue twice a day, if you do, only geeks will want them.

    3. Re:Hm... by rincebrain · · Score: 1

      Nothing can save us from the terrible secret of space.

      Unless we have protection.

      --
      It's only an insult if it's not true.
    4. Re:Hm... by Fjornir · · Score: 1

      Do you have stairs in your house?

      Pushing is the answer.
      Humans must be pushed.

      Pushing will protect you.
      Pushing will protect you from the terrible secret of space.

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    5. Re:Hm... by Fjornir · · Score: 1

      You do not understand. Space holds a terrible power. Please stand by the stairs so we can protect you.

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
  2. And I want a laser beam put in my glass eye! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. all cyborg like!

  3. I, for one.. by modifried · · Score: 0, Troll

    .. welcome our new amputee overlords.

    1. Re:I, for one.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In WAR, overlords amputate YOU!

    2. Re:I, for one.. by Copley · · Score: 1

      Man, this joke is just SO lame!

      I know this is /. and we have some traditions to respect, but...

      With all these talented /. contributers around, you'd have thought this crappy joke would have died an unpleasant death by now and been replaced by something slightly more witty!

      Likewise 'In Soviet Russia...'!

      --
      I am bald
    3. Re:I, for one.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, the joke is fine. The problem is just idiots who use it when it's not funny...

  4. Boring by smart_ass · · Score: 2, Informative

    For people in the industry this is OLD news ... the CLeg has been around for ages.

    http://www.ottobockus.com/about/press_room_view_it em.asp?id=140

    Many alternatives from different companies exist for the CLeg.

    The myoelectric stuff is at least cool, but the CLeg?

    Come on ... news should be new.

    --
    Ouch ... did I just say that.
    1. Re:Boring by kschawel · · Score: 1

      Not only is it old, it doesn't seem to have very much technical information in it. Am I wrong? I actually did RTFA.

    2. Re:Boring by not-quite-rite · · Score: 1

      amen

      i swear the advances in prosthetics are evolutionary, and far from revolutionary these days.

      i guess the comparison would be moving from the body powered egg-beater to an electric egg beater. same thing but with a motor. :)

  5. What would be nice... by dosius · · Score: 1

    I admit it would prolly be considered poor form, but it would be nice if I could replace my four limbs with prosthetics, then they wouldn't be so pisspoor excuses for arms and legs and wouldn't be so sore so often, my legs especially. Besides, my feet are shot to shit. Please don't ask me to explain.

    Moll.

    --
    What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    1. Re:What would be nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please explain.

    2. Re:What would be nice... by bburton · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually that is an interesting comment. I have often wondered about that same topic. Will people, in the distant (or maybe even near?) future volunteer to swap their human body parts for machine replacements?

      If technology keeps developing at the rate it has been, how long will it be before prosthetic limbs become superior to the ones we are born with? Imagine super stong mechanical arms or legs, which are controlled through your nervous system. Imagine replacement livers and hearts and maybe even brains that are immune to disease...

      Hmmm, excuse me, I think I'm going to go watch Ghost in the Shell now.

      --
      Slashdot = ((Technology + Politics) / Trolls) % Grammar Nazis
    3. Re:What would be nice... by TWX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Will people, in the distant (or maybe even near?) future volunteer to swap their human body parts for machine replacements?"

      I wouldn't. My body is relatively self-healing, so if I mess something up it has a pretty decent chance of fixing itself to at least a functional state without outside intervention. It's a system that has functioned in billions of units for tens, if not hundreds of thousands of years.

      Machines break. Electronics suffer from bad programming. Technicians might not be easily found, and if my arms stopped working I'd have a hard time fixing them myself. My arms are also submersible to fairly extreme depths, able to withstand hot and cold to a significant degree, and capable of extremely fine motor control and motion.

      Body part replacements for me would be a last resort if my stock ones were failing.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    4. Re:What would be nice... by krautcanman · · Score: 1

      For the obligatory cliche humor: Might as well. It's going to cost you an arm and a leg, anyway.

    5. Re:What would be nice... by wertarbyte · · Score: 1

      Will people, in the distant (or maybe even near?) future volunteer to swap their human body parts for machine replacements?

      Every playes "Syndicate"? "Volunteer" is relative :-) .oO(Cooper Team)

      --
      Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
    6. Re:What would be nice... by burdalane · · Score: 1

      The best option would probably be body part enhancements. Prosthetics may not be self-healing or as versatile as natural body parts, but if there were a way to make the natural parts super-strong and tough (i.e. increased resistance to temperature and impact) without completely replacing them, I would gladly volunteer.

    7. Re:What would be nice... by clifyt · · Score: 5, Informative

      Its going to be a *LONG* time before this happens.

      Regardless of how superior they get, its still going to be a pain in the ass just to attach them, let alone all the other biologicals problems that have little to do with the machine.

      I have a degenerative disease that is killing a few joints and I've been told I'll probably have to have my knee replaced if I don't stop abusing it (at this point, abusing it means riding my biked 20 - 30 miles a week in the summer -- and thats down from the 100 I had been doing, and I'm *STILL* a light weight compared to most of the folks I know who bike on a regular occasion).

      Anywho, a good friend works at the VA and draws my blood for me regularly and while I'm there, I occasionally get to talk with some of the veterans...over the last year, they have increasingly been younger guys my age and now a days, I almost look clean cut enough to fit in without one of the administrators getting upset that she's doing this (even though its always on her break, lest someone accuses me of helping steal from the US Gov).

      But after talking with one amputee, I'll never want to even joke about the prostesises again. For the CLeg, ya have to have your leg blown off from above the knee (actually I learned that from Doonsbury), but they also say that there is a nasty bone graft you have to go through to attach it. it always gets infected because even though its titanium, its still wearing against the bone in a way that can't be stopped. Secondly, you will always have an open wound -- the skin in this area is not meant to simply pucker up around something sticking out of it. Think of any naturally occuring holes in youy body and think of how it goes from regular skin to something that is a little more sealable. Ya don't have that with this. So, expect infections in this all the time too.

      I was joking with the one guy I met that it would make my life much easier but was given a reality check quickly. Given the rate of decay on my knee, I'll probably have to have something replaced in the next 5 to 10 years (maybe longer if I felt like sitting at home and wasting my life), but I think I'll skip the prostesis for the moment and just see if they can replace the bones and joints -- something simple. I have no doubt that replacement arms or legs will be superior to the parts coming off, but until we get the rest of the parts they have to connect with upgraded (maybe just the brain in a jar), I think I'm only going to look at this as technology to be used in unavoidable circumstances.

    8. Re:What would be nice... by djward · · Score: 1

      its still going to be a pain in the ass just to attach them

      In the case of prosthetic legs, quite literally...

    9. Re:What would be nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you looked into therapeutic yoga, possibly iyengar. I had knee problems where the joint was wearing away. They suggested knee surgery, but i've seen what it's done to people.
      After doing yoga, i found i was holding my leg improperly. It's amazing how much your body can heal a joint (which it does every single moment of your life) when you're not constantly wearing it away by incorrect movements.
      No more knee pain for me now :)

    10. Re:What would be nice... by clifyt · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it is a genetic defect related to psorasis -- which is generally a skin disorder. It attacks for no reason other than my body is confused as to what is a foreign body or not. Or something like that (too complicated to go into in a /. comment).

      But yeah, proper balance and otherwise will extend the life, but it won't prevent it.

  6. The C-Legs.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    So the C-Leg helps with balance 50 times per second, eh?

    Sounds like the C-Leg might be a good replacement for someone who already lost their sea legs.

    Thank you, thank you, I'll be here all night...

    1. Re:The C-Legs.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll C-your-Leg and raise you my arm.

    2. Re:The C-Legs.... by Charcharodon · · Score: 1

      Would someone who had to many to drink still fall down if he had two of these legs?

  7. Good news by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is good news, but you know, it doesn't put a smile on my face. If there were a story here entitled "Thousands of kids didn't lose their leg in the first place" that would make me smile.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    1. Re:Good news by Zakabog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can't report something that didn't happen, how are you supposed to know if it was going ot happen if it didn't? Otherwise the news might be a lot better "Millions of people didn't die today, as a nuclear weapon was not launched at NY." I'm sure thousands of kids DIDN'T lose their legs, I'm sure it was millions even, all because of some thing that may of happened recently that made some other thing much safer. But like I said, you'd never know about it because it is something that didn't happen.

    2. Re: Good news by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Informative


      Supposedly the "average wound" in this war is worse than in any previous war, partly because most of it is done by explosives rather than bullets, partly because of improvements in body armor for the head and torso, and partly because improved medical technology is saving a lot of people who would have just died in any previous war.

      BTW, you can see the overall casualty counts (wounds and deaths separately) at globalsecurity.org. (Notice the running-average plots at the bottom, which show the trends.)

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:Good news by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Insightful
      While I agree to some extent, I also feel there is no point in posting about it. I mean, this is akin to yelling at people who buy expensive toys that "they should be donating their money to starving children".

      The reality is people lost limbs, the good news is they are getting replacements that are much more advanced than they used to be. Lets be happy and leave it at that.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    4. Re:Good news by SsShane · · Score: 1

      There are some posts where I wish I could see (Score:10, Insightful).

    5. Re:Good news by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      People in difficult situations have to make difficult decisions.
      In hospitals around the tsunami hit area, survivors are having to make an almost unthinkable choice:

      Life or limb.

      I know which I would choose.

      from http://uk.news.yahoo.com/050106/325/f9qmg.html

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    6. Re:Good news by Vicsun · · Score: 1

      I do think you missed the point of your parent. The last sentance in his post was quite obviously tongue-in-cheek.

      But thanks for pointing out the obvious anyway

    7. Re:Good news by Irashtar · · Score: 0

      au contrare! *wished was headline* DUBYA wasn't re-elected; Kerry didn't lose; Gay marriage not outlawed; need I go on?

    8. Re:Good news by nick-less · · Score: 1

      This is good news, but you know, it doesn't put a smile on my face. If there were a story here entitled "Thousands of kids didn't lose their leg in the first place" that would make me smile.


      The first step to get a headline like this would be to stop the production of anti person land mines.
      This has already happend, many major countries have agreed to to stop production and distribution of this mines, but there is one major country left whos military can't guaranty the national security without anti person mines, and so they are still using them...

    9. Re: Good news by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      I wish they would make the distinction between serious injuries (going back home) and minor injuries (will be back on front line within a month or less).

      The injury counts are always misleading, and usually worthless, unless you have some way of qaulifying them. After all, getting a tiny piece of shrapnel in your arm still counts as an injury, but hardly means it's life altering. In fact, minor wounds such as that, usually means the man is back in service in the next day (or les).

    10. Re: Good news by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 1
      Supposedly the "average wound" in this war is worse than in any previous war

      You're kidding, right? I wish I could find an online version of the picture of the German Major who got his frickin face blown off in WWI. No upper jaw, no nose, his eyes were gone. He survived and lived to 80 years or something like that. Most injuries in WWI were like that - parts of people got blown off. That's the effect of massive artillery against infantry.

      I don't think that WWI will ever be matched again (short of a nuclear holocaust). During the Somme offensive alone, which lasted about 6 months, over one million soldiers died. Compared to almost any other war in history, Iraq is a joke - 1500 dead American soldiers? More probably died in the first hour of most wars in the past. It just makes me wonder how today's media would deal with casualty numbers like the ones in WWI.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    11. Re: Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're stupid, right? In WWI, millions of soldiers did die, and some survived horrific injuries. This means that the AVERAGE injury wasn't very big.

      In the Iraq case, it means that more soldiers will return with more injuries than ever before! Christ, I can't believe I have to explain this to someone who can use a computer.

  8. Boisvert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This really puts it in perspective:
    He related experiences few 21-year-olds can fathom. "I think I killed over 20 people," he said. "You could see them, through your scope, 40 meters away, get hit by your bullet. Later in the day you thought, wow, I just killed someone. But it's not like they're innocent."
  9. The Question is... by Wingie · · Score: 0, Troll

    Would the US army send the newly "enhanced" soldiers back to Iraq?

    1. Re:The Question is... by MmmmAqua · · Score: 1

      If the soldier wants to remain in active service, and can physically perform to Army standards, and can pass a medical review board, then yes.

      But only if the soldier wants to stay in.

      --
      Arr! The laws of physics be a harsh mistress!
    2. Re:The Question is... by kschawel · · Score: 1

      These improvements allow amputees improved mobility over the Vietnam era, with many limbless veterans already contemplating running, skiing, and even a return to combat, according to veterans officials.

      Apparently some want to go back, I would guess the US would send them back.

    3. Re:The Question is... by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      The real question is, if you get shot in the same leg you already got replace with an artificial one, would you get another purple heart and be listed as a casualty or would it be a battle damage issue?

      Battle damage only happens to equipment ;)

    4. Re:The Question is... by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      "You scratched the paintwork! That was new last month!"

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  10. Civilian Application by drivinghighway61 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As with many military innovations, it will be interesting to see the future of computerized limbs when they reach the civilian population. I've met a few people with prosthetics, and devices like this would certainly help them. Despite views on war, this can only help.

    1. Re:Civilian Application by smart_ass · · Score: 1

      I've met many civilians with this leg, it is arleady out ... and has been for many years. There are already similar devices from other companies. IIRC the US is one of the largest markets for the C-Leg due to teh medical insurance being better than in many other places.

      The C-Leg is made by Ottobock (a German company), the largest supplier in the P&O (Prosthetic and Orthotic) market. Another company (Proteor, of France) makes many knee joints as well.

      --
      Ouch ... did I just say that.
    2. Re:Civilian Application by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with a Utah3 Arm.

    3. Re:Civilian Application by eln · · Score: 1

      Anyone who's seen the "Terminator" series of documentaries knows that World War IV will be fought between humans and machines using a variety of futuristic weapons in a post-acpocalyptic hellscape.

    4. Re:Civilian Application by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are, at leasr in India. Pres. Abdul Kalam asked for the carbon composites used in missile tech. to be used for low weight prosthetics. Better than all this new fangled stuff about electronics, motors,batteries et all, look up the 'Jaipur foot' tch. done in India.

  11. How many... by CPM+User · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    How many Iraqi's are getting replacements like these ?

    1. Re:How many... by RobinH · · Score: 1

      Forty two? :)

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    2. Re:How many... by Indy+Media+Watch · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, were you talking about the accidental civilian casualties of the Coalition? Or the very deliberate amputation victims of Saddam Hussein, mercifully no longer a problem.

      Video of Saddam's limb-choppers

      But let's not turn a technical discussion of prosthetics into cheap political pointscoring eh?

      --

      Indy Media Watch-Proctologist of the Internet

    3. Re:How many... by CPM+User · · Score: 1

      The civilian casualties... and I'll stop if you will.

  12. Limb and reenlistment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With these artificial limbs they should be able to complete another tour of duty in Iraq.

  13. Wrist-Action by Indy+Media+Watch · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Utah3 Arm, which allows simultaneous motion in the elbow, hand and wrist, offering movement old prosthetics could not

    Woohoo! Now I won't need that other battery operated prosthetic device.

    I wonder if these things also make that ch-ch-ch-ch-ch noise when I bend things or jump over stuff...

    --

    Indy Media Watch-Proctologist of the Internet

    1. Re:Wrist-Action by CPM+User · · Score: 2, Funny
      Which other prosthetic ?

      This one ?

    2. Re:Wrist-Action by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "I wonder if these things also make that ch-ch-ch-ch-ch noise when I bend things or jump over stuff..."

      Heh. Imagine it as a marital aid.

      "Hey baby, wanna role play? Ch-ch-ch-ch-ch-ch-ch..."

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  14. And who said war wasn't productive?! by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 0

    The leading reason behind amputation is diabetes, a wholly preventable disease brought about by sedentary lifestyle and excessive intake of insulin-promoting foods.

    The second is the current war in Iraq. Personally, I'd rather see those boys come home in one piece, and not just because they couldn't find the other pieces.

    But back to Diabetes, I was actually borderline diabetic. While I experienced some numbness in my extremities, I was able to control it with my diet. I am (as the nick suggests) very overweight and finally, a year ago, did something about it. I went on the Atkins diet and have literally become the opposite of what I was back then. My diabetes has cleared up, my waistline is becoming a respectable 36 inches, and I can see my toes again for the first time in years.

    Now the Holidays did a number on me (all those cookies and milk! oof) and I had to climb back on the Atkins wagon again, but my doctors say that I am not in any danger of becoming diabetic again while I am on this diet. Also, with the weight off, Mrs. Claus is a happy lady again (wink wink).

  15. i watched an interview from one of these guys, by thesonicboom · · Score: 2, Informative

    hegot 2 prosthetics, a manual version and this computer version. he is using the simple clamp prosthetic 'cause the computerized version breaks too often and the batteries dont last long. The one he actually uses just has a cord that goes to his shoulder, when he wants the clamp to open, he just flexes his arm a certain way. He put his computerized arm in the closet after it keept running down..

  16. Love the sense of normalcy by fuzzy12345 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now that miscellaneous events have succeeded in pushing the war to the back pages, with the occasional unfortunate flare-up, it's good to see stories about all the good things that war is bringing us. Freedom is on the hobble!

    --

    Everybody's a libertarian 'till their neighbour's becomes a crack house.
    1. Re: Love the sense of normalcy by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > Now that miscellaneous events have succeeded in pushing the war to the back pages

      Unfortunately, between tsunami fatigue, upcoming elections, and predictions of escalated violence intended to disrupt those elections, I suspect Iraq is going to start dominating the news again in a week or two.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re: Love the sense of normalcy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "Unfortunately, between tsunami fatigue, upcoming elections, and predictions of escalated violence intended to disrupt those elections, I suspect Iraq is going to start dominating the news again in a week or two."

      I'm still waiting for the first significant battle to come out of Iraq. Do you know how many men died at Ypres? Or in the first hour on Iwo Jima? The media wants us to get upset about 3 or 5 soldiers killed in a car bomb. Until we start hearing about tens of thousands dead in a single firefight, it's not really a war, by the standards that history gives us.

      Yes, I just counted the few casualties of Iraq as insignificant. Call me names, or ship me to Cuba for saying it, but it's the truth. Real war casualties would not sit well with the people who are already conditioned to get upset about single-digit body counts.

  17. Microsoft or Linux? by qualico · · Score: 1

    Do the limbs run Linux?
    If so...can you imagine a cluster of those!?

    Not sure I'd want Microsoft controlling my body parts though.
    People could mistake you for having epilepsy due to its constant rebooting. :->

    1. Re:Microsoft or Linux? by smart_ass · · Score: 1

      I know you are kidding, but the programming software for the C-Leg runs on Windoze and uses serial communication to program it to the individual user's gait (the way that they walk).

      Don't know what kinda of embedded OS is onboard though.

      --
      Ouch ... did I just say that.
    2. Re:Microsoft or Linux? by DrEasy · · Score: 1

      Whatever it is running, hopefully it can't be hacked!

      --
      "In our tactical decisions, we are operating contrary to our strategic interest."
    3. Re:Microsoft or Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully they'll port MAME to it :-)

    4. Re:Microsoft or Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think ghost in the shell =)

    5. Re:Microsoft or Linux? by qualico · · Score: 1

      Not sure what is onboard.
      If they go WiFi for the communication that could get interesting with war drivers taking control of your body. :->

      Otherwise, it would be interesting to use a PDA to program the leg with different modes, like sports use, hiking...etc.

      In fact, it could get to the point where people actually have limbs removed to sport an improved performance part.

    6. Re:Microsoft or Linux? by qualico · · Score: 1

      Gives new meaning to catching a virus.

    7. Re:Microsoft or Linux? by qualico · · Score: 1

      lol!

  18. Silly names by DarkRecluse · · Score: 1


    I can see that the technology of prosthetics is slowly catching up to 80's cartoon terminology.

    --
    --"It's Bradford Company, slash your last name, dot your first name"
  19. Way to go by adeydas · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Way to go, this is going to help those brave soldiers a lot.

  20. Starship troopers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Mobile infantry made me the man I am today !"

    1. Re:Starship Troopers by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      Err no? Exactly what proportion are you talking about? The number of Americans dying on the roads every month still out numbers the total dead of Iraq and Afganastan put together?

      We're talking women and children here not volunteer soldiers. It could be anyone you know anywhere any time. It could be you.

      Some how we seem to be managing pretty well, so how does Iraq suddenly become "scary" when it's smaller by a factor of 50?

      Really people get a clue and some sense of perspective.

      And for the record we are not killing everybody that disagrees with us, just most of them.

    2. Re:Starship Troopers by Izeickl · · Score: 1

      "The Americans will always do the right thing... after they've exhausted all the alternatives." Winston Churchill

    3. Re:Starship Troopers by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

      Your comment regarding road deaths is entirely appropriate, and in fact an argument I tend to use myself in other contexts (such as when people whine about "oh, the terrorists!" or the "terrible danger" of flying.).

      In other words, good point.

      I guess my point was merely that the war has become surprisingly big and is having an impact on the US, at least as I see it from an outside perspective, that looks quite significant. I've heard comments from folks over there to the effect of "it's no longer just 'some other bugger', it's the guy you /know/ getting his face shot off."

      As for killing people, in fairness the US is mostly only killing people who disagree with them by shooting them and blowing them up, not just those that dissent. The number of people getting killed on the sidelines over in Iraq is scary though... when bombing buildings and fighting for control of cities, a lot of folks are going to get killed who were just in the wrong place.

      I am worried by the way the US does seem to be getting well into torturing people who disagree with them or were just in the wrong place at the wrong time, though.

      For the record, I'm Australian, so my country is following along with what the US is doing like a puppy. I can hardly stand aside and claim it's not my fault or my problem (much as I wish our PM had not taken the side he did).

    4. Re:Starship Troopers by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      You have to understand that our media in the US is pretty much full of shit. They ramble on about anything. For example the other day. We're training the Iraqi's to form their own paramilitary special forces/police force to actively hunt down and deal with terrorists, since terrorists tend not to go quietly or willingly most likely it would result in deaths.

      So what does the news report? Not that we are finally devoting the resourses to help these people fight their own fight, but that the CIA and the US Military are creating Iragi death squads to kill dissidents. Which is totally off in left field.

      More or less the news in the US is not much better than entertainment. Their target audience is pretty much the same waste of human space that pull over at major traffic accidents to take picutes or in hopes of seeing a dead body.

      The actual impact in most people's lives is negligable, maybe not for those in the Army and their families, but they represent a very tiny portion of the population. Other than what news flashes up once in a while it's pretty much a dead topic and most people don't even pay much attention to it anymore. Though of course if you believe the hype on the news you'd think 49% of the population wants the President's head on a stake and are out in the streets daily screaming for it. That's so far from the truth that it's pathetic. Right now most of the media is getting it's ass run through the grinder publicly for all the false articles and stories they ran during the election. They have very little credibility at the moment.

      The torture thing well yeah we dropped the ball on that one, but if it's any consolation, people do not have fun in military prison and those that will be convicted for their cruelty and stupidity will be enjoying some hard labor for the next decade or two.

      The casualty count in Iraq is very sad, but at the same time it's a war there is no such thing as non-combatants when area effect weapons come into play and the insurgents know this, so they tend to hide amongst the general population. At the same time we could go back to the tactics we used in WW II. There has been somewhere over 100,000 casualties including both military and civilian in Iraq, in one fire bombing raid of Tokyo alone killed over 200,000 civilians. The target was not military facilities but was specifically the civilian population of Tokyo. That's even more than both the atomic bomb casualies put together. Pretty much our ultimatum to the Japanese people was surrender or face extermination.

      Again as I stated earlier people have very skewed perspective when it comes to the past. If they had the proper one then they'd realize exactly how cautious and gently (I'm not saying the best way) we are treating the situation in the Middle East.

      Because if it came down to it, if we really wanted to we could end the conflict in Iraq in the span of 45 minutes. Don't believe me? Then just ask the Japanese what we are capable of...

  21. Oblig. Red vs. Blue by interactive_civilian · · Score: 1
    dosius said:
    Besides, my feet are shot to shit.
    heh...reminds me of this exchange:

    Sarge: Son did you just shoot yourself in the foot?

    Simmons: Yeah...I do that now sometimes. I don't really know why.

    Sarge: I'm sure it's user error.

    - Red vs. Blue Season 2, Episode 38.

    --
    "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
  22. Re:Yay! by MmmmAqua · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yeah, parent was a troll, and yeah, this is off topic, but seeing as how I'm sitting here in Baghdad, I just want to point something out:

    Nobody here who actually picks up a rifle and goes out looking for bad guys is doing it for anything other than the guys fighting beside him. Don't get yourself all worked up about how we've been duped, and lied to, etc. etc.

    We know the score. We know what the real reasons for the war are. There isn't much blind flag-waving Bush-terbation here. But we don't have a choice about when and where we fight; we just have a job to do, and lives to save and take in doing it.

    We don't want your pity, and we don't want you using us as martyrs in your protests against the government. We want you to leave us alone to do our jobs, and have some respect for those poor bastards who come home minus an arm or a leg or a hand.

    --
    Arr! The laws of physics be a harsh mistress!
  23. You are ignorant by gregm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are 2 types of diabetes Type 1 which is sometimes also refered to as juvenile diabetes and usually strikes children. My step-son came down with it when he was 3 and it's not because he was fat slob who sat on his ass all day eating candy. Translated it wasn't preventable.

    I get so sick and tired if ignorant people whining about their wimpy little Type 2 diabetes and worrying about the possibility of having to give themselves injections. My step son has been doing that for years (actually he's on an insulin pump now which is a wonderful thing). Plus the type 2 people like to try to swap war stories with my stepson (he's now 19). His body produces 0 insulin and was a real treat to deal with through puberty.

    I also have an Uncle who was one of te most fit and active people I know... he came down with Type 2 diabetes when he was 60.

    So let's not be spreading this "wholly preventable" FUD as it's not true in all cases.

  24. Join the Army and Win a Chance to Become a Cyborg! by acz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Join the Army and Win a Chance to Become a Cyborg!

    How long do you think it will it take before they run an advert like that?

    They already do their best to recruit Counter-Strike players
    on Gamespy! (I am not kidding!)

    Anthony
    --
    Bellua Cyber Security Asia 2005
    21-22 March - The Workshops - 23-24 March - The Conference

  25. Oh good, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since I have a friend of a friend who just had his hand blown off while in Iraq.

  26. Good and Bad by atlasheavy · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It's good to hear that returning veterans are being treated better and more rapidly than in the past, and that technological improvements are going to improve their quality of life. Nonetheless, if it wasn't for the failed war policies of this administration, kids our age (and yes, at 22 I definitely consider myself a kid) wouldn't be put into this sort of horribly traumatic situation in the first place.

    Mod me down as flamebait or a troll if you want, so be it, slashdot karma isn't worth glorifying the mess our great nation has ended up in due to the arrogance of a small group of people in Washington.

    --

    iRooster, the Mac OS X a
    1. Re:Good and Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "due to the arrogance of a small group of people in Washington."

      Unfortunately that small group of people won by an (ill-gotten, assuredly) majority.. so at least to a majority of the world, it's not just a small group of people in DC. It's a large group of people who want that small group of people in power.

      The current US leaders are a symptom of a problem. They are not the problem. The problem is the basic culture of the United States. As a country we have forgotten what the american dream means, what freedom means, and what innovation means. We are content, as a country, to wallow in our Jerry Springer, Maury, and Wal-Mart, whislt the world advances around us in education systems and tolerance.

    2. Re:Good and Bad by CMRichar · · Score: 2, Insightful
      due to the arrogance of a small group of people in Washington.

      Now, now, I'm sure that the 'small group of people' had very worth-wile reasons for doing what they did such as ... OH MY GOD!!!! LOOK AT THE SIZE OF THAT DISTRACTION!!!!

      carrier lost....

      --
      "Good night, good work, sleep well, I'll most likely kill you in the morning." - Dread Pirate Roberts
    3. Re:Good and Bad by Charcharodon · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I hate to tell but all wars are the result of "failed" policies and this particular one has been brewing for the last 50 years not just the last 5.

      As for the small group of the arrogant Washington I think you are being to selective. It would be more like a large group of arrogant gits around the globe are why we are in one of these messes every decade or two.

    4. Re:Good and Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod me down as flamebait or a troll if you want, so be it, slashdot karma isn't worth glorifying the mess our great nation has ended up in due to [blah].

      Refraining from posting entirely off-topic, inflammatory and arguably inane US political commentary as a response to an article about advances in prosthetics does not equal "glorifying the mess...".

      Damn, I get so tired of some of you Americans some times. The rest of the world doesn't really care all that much about your two party bickering and point scoring.

    5. Re:Good and Bad by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1
      Refraining from posting entirely off-topic, inflammatory and arguably inane US political commentary as a response to an article about advances in prosthetics does not equal "glorifying the mess...". Damn, I get so tired of some of you Americans some times. The rest of the world doesn't really care all that much about your two party bickering and point scoring.

      Real wars beget flamewars. Being Americans, and this being a site of American manufacture, any topic that can possibly be tied in the most tertiary way to our war du jour will wind up becoming a forum for the discussion of said war. It occupies our consciousness because it's big, and we disagree vehemently among ourselves as to whether it is or was worthwhile to commence. Personally, I think the Iraq war rates as one of history's all-time dumbest fiascos, and that should have been obvious to everyone from the start, but Christ, do you have any idea what 12 years of American public school does to your higher brain functions? America is Homer Simpson. America is a big, happy Golden Retriever that ambles around insouciantly smashing delicate things with it's madly wagging tail. Sorry.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    6. Re:Good and Bad by mangu · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Mod me down as flamebait or a troll


      Sorry, I'm out of mod points right now.


      slashdot karma isn't worth glorifying the mess our great nation has ended up in due to the arrogance of a small group of people in Washington


      Arrogance, yes, small group of people, yes, but not in Washington. The current mess in the Middle East began a long time ago, in 1919, when the British and French diplomats divided the Ottoman Empire, which had been in the losing side in World War I. If they had done their homework, they would have known they were creating a nation, Iraq, composed of three different regions, with three different groups: shiites, sunnites, and kurds. An inviable country, whose most probable form of government is a dictatorship.


      Now, what is the right thing for the POTUS to do? Should he be an isolationist? If Woodrow Wilson hadn't been one in 1914, WWI would have lasted less, with less victims, and probably none of the great convulsions of the 20th century. A short war might not have caused the birth of nazism. Possibly even Russia wouldn't have gone through communism.


      And even if nazism did happen, if FDR had gone to war in 1939 instead of waiting two years for the inevitable, WWII would have been less traumatic. Or better, if FDR, Chamberlain, and Daladier had stood up to Hitler in 1938 there would have been no war. If Bush senior had done the right thing and invaded Iraq in 1991 you wouldn't have all this mess today.


      Looking back over the last hundred years, I get the impression that arrogance isn't what starts wars. Wars start because of indecision. When a dictator feels that other leaders fear him, he thinks he can get away with anything. The best way to avoid wars is to make it clear to all the Saddams and Hitlers that tyranny isn't an accepted form of government, anywhere. Such rulers should be removed from power, using the necessary force. When this becomes the usual procedure we may say goodbye to all wars.

    7. Re:Good and Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Looking back over the last hundred years, I get the impression that arrogance isn't what starts wars. Wars start because of indecision. When a dictator feels that other leaders fear him, he thinks he can get away with anything. The best way to avoid wars is to make it clear to all the Saddams and Hitlers that tyranny isn't an accepted form of government, anywhere. Such rulers should be removed from power, using the necessary force. When this becomes the usual procedure we may say goodbye to all wars.

      I hope we one day can do this to George W. Bush.

    8. Re:Good and Bad by Ztream · · Score: 1

      I'll be impressed when they put these prosthetics on wounded Iraqi civilians.

    9. Re:Good and Bad by nagora · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The best way to avoid wars is to make it clear to all the Saddams and Hitlers that tyranny isn't an accepted form of government, anywhere. Such rulers should be removed from power, using the necessary force.

      Perhaps, then, America shouldn't hire people like Saddam to assassinate leaders, and put them in place once the old leader is dead. Perhaps, then, Donald Rumsfeld shouldn't sell people like Saddam biological weapons of mass destruction and perhaps, then, people like George Bush shouldn't send "experts" in to help with the "calibration" of those weapons. Perhaps, in fact, tracing the history of Iraq back to 1919 is simply a handy way of ignoring the actual and immediate fact that these soldiers are dying for a government which caused the problem in Iraq and who decided to attack it on the feeble pretext of the War on Terror in order to, as Wolfowitz's said, secure America's economic future (ie, oil).

      A little less pointing the finger at long dead people and their wars and a little more pointing it at the people in power today who are sacrificing their people for money today might help fix this mess.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    10. Re:Good and Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "I'll be impressed when they put these prosthetics on wounded Iraqi civilians."

      I'll be more impressed when we STOP WOUNDING Iraqi civilians.

    11. Re:Good and Bad by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      It's nice to see that some of us have the luxury to consider themselves to be kids at the age of 22.

      Good for you.

    12. Re:Good and Bad by snorklewacker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And even if nazism did happen, if FDR had gone to war in 1939 instead of waiting two years for the inevitable, WWII would have been less traumatic.

      Perhaps. But we were at war in all but title by then anyway. Maybe we would have ratched up a fearsome enough war production that it would have convinced Japan to leave us alone, and they would have kept much of their conquests.

      Maybe if Chamberlain had declared war back then, Hitler would have gone after a much weaker England sooner and convinced its populace through an even longer and worse air campaign to stay out of mainland Europe's own affairs.

      Rewriting history is a tricky thing.

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
    13. Re:Good and Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not, Bush's "youthful indiscresions" took place when he was 40.

    14. Re:Good and Bad by atlasheavy · · Score: 1

      This isn't to say that I live in my parents' basement, or anything else along those lines. I finished up my B.S. degree over a year ago, and I work full-time for a large corporation doing software development. But still, attempting to label myself as an adult in comparison to some of the people I work with (especially those with kids) is just a joke.

      --

      iRooster, the Mac OS X a
    15. Re:Good and Bad by atlasheavy · · Score: 1

      amen.

      --

      iRooster, the Mac OS X a
  27. Thank goodness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I don't have to worry about losing a hand in a lightsabre duel.

  28. Soldiers and human warfare ... time for a change? by HellYeahAutomaton · · Score: 1

    I know there are a lot of people out there into the whole preservation-of-life thing, so I'm going to pitch an idea here.

    For the longest time we've had unmanned air vehicles, and airplanes autonomously taking off and landing.

    Instead of having our own soldiers getting blown up themselves up in Humvees and on foot with mindfields and heralding better prosthetics, why not retrofit some Asimos with killing capabilities and send them instead of human soldiers?

  29. Re:What would be nice... regarding GiTS by acz · · Score: 1

    Make sure you watch Ghost in the Shell Stand Alone Complex Series 1st gig (26 episodes) and 2nd gig (17 episodes and still running)

    You can grab them using bittorrent. The subtitles made by the Laughing Man are excellent (the licensed versions of most Japanese anime suck.)

    Same thing for GiTS 2, Innocense... even if you bought the DVD you should try to find the fansubs (subtitles).

    --
    Bellua Cyber Security Asia 2005
    21-22 March - The Workshops - 23-24 March - The Conference

  30. As cool as the tech is... by SealBeater · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I bet that he would rather have his leg back.

    SealBeater

    --
    -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
    1. Re:As cool as the tech is... by dbIII · · Score: 1
      I bet that he would rather have his leg back.
      Reminds me of a classic sports interview question by a clueless journo to a guy in a wheelchair - "Have you alway wanted to be a paralympian?" Reply - "No, I used to have legs."

      So long as a few countries continue to deploy land mines we will see a lot more of this - war is going to happen somewhere or another, but it's a good idea to follow international treaties on land mines, biological weapons and treatment of prisoners or it will come back and bite you in the bum some day. Those land mines in Iraq are probably made in the USA.

  31. Return to Combat by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 4, Informative
    From the article: These improvements allow amputees improved mobility over the Vietnam era, with many limbless veterans already contemplating running, skiing, and even a return to combat, according to veterans officials.

    You get your leg amputated after your second tour, get an artifical leg, do rehab, then...get sent back to Iraq for tour #3?

    Hopefully soldiers returning to combat after amputation have volunteered to do so. Imagine getting sent back again involunarily after losing a leg.

    These soldiers deserve the best gear and care we can give them. Tragically they're not getting it, especially critical after-care, follow-ups, meds, counseling, etc. Clinics and a few hospitals are closing, and new soliders are having many medical benefits phased out because their incomes are judged to be "too high." We're not talking Generals here, we're talking folks that make under $40k a year.

    Take a look at the unclassified stats for WIAs (pdf).

    1. Re:Return to Combat by zors · · Score: 1

      The limbless veterans are the ones doing the contemplating, not the brass.

      Its been done before, with pilots who lost legs, and there was that diver from Men of Honor* who got a replacement limb, then went back to duty. Believe it or not, some people actually think they are doing the right thing being over there, and could feasibly want to continue doing it with a fake leg.

      http://imdb.com/title/tt0203019/?fr=c2l0ZT1kZnxteD 0yMHxzZz0xfGxtPTIwMHx0dD1vbnxwbj0wfHE9TWVuIG9mIEhv bm9yfGh0bWw9MXxubT1vbg__;fc=1;ft=20 Too lazy to do the right formatting sorry.

    2. Re:Return to Combat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe it or not, some people actually think they are doing the right thing being over there, and could feasibly want to continue doing it with a fake leg.

      That's what makes the whole thing even scarier: fanatic soldiers fighting a war for bogus reasons.

    3. Re:Return to Combat by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 1
      The limbless veterans are the ones doing the contemplating, not the brass.

      A soldier usually has the option; however, given the shortage and stop loss situation I wouldn't be surprised to see amputees being involuntarily put back in the mix, perhaps in a support role rather than combat arms. It wouldn't be the most f***ed up thing the Army has ever done, but it would be close.

      Believe it or not, some people actually think they are doing the right thing being over there, and could feasibly want to continue doing it with a fake leg.

      I never said otherwise. Some troops feel it's the right thing, some troops feel that the whole thing is FUBAR. Most soliders I know fall into the second category. Regardless of that, you want to be with your unit and your buddies. You do your duty. Even though you'd rather everyone be home.

      As the saying goes: opinions are like a**holes, everybody's got one. I think this whole Iraq mess was FUBAR from the get go.

      Even so, if I could I would go so my brother or some other guy with kids wouldn't have to do another tour. But I can't - my knees and hips are screwed up and I was bounced out twice on a medical. The day I turned in my TA-50 and finished outprocessing was one of the most disappointing days of my life.

      That's nothing compared to what these guys are going through - I can walk and I have all my limbs. BTW, getting banged up was a combination of bad luck compounded by my own stupidity and wasn't the Army's fault.

  32. Cheaper in India (as usual) by thewalled · · Score: 1

    India has developed cheaper alternatives years back..

    http://www.jaipurfoot.org/

    - dhawal

    1. Re:Cheaper in India (as usual) by proudlyindian · · Score: 1

      yeah and its free as in everysense

  33. Wow by aztektum · · Score: 1
    This is so much better than having their actual limb intact still almost 2 years ago.

    Sorry for the outburst. Please moderate offtopic.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  34. Re:Join the Army and Win a Chance Torture People by BrianMarshall · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ... or perhaps just the possibility of getting to beat people. Or chain them in painful positions for hours on end.

    The problem with decent people joining the Army is the possibiltiy that they will be given jobs that a decent person would find extremely disturbing to perform.

    Although this certainly isn't the first time that has been true.

    --
    "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" -- HST
  35. Damned lucky amputees... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where are the cybernetic prostitutes for the rest of us??

    Oh... wait...

  36. Re: Soldiers and human warfare ... time for a chan by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny


    > Instead of having our own soldiers getting blown up themselves up in Humvees and on foot with mindfields and heralding better prosthetics, why not retrofit some Asimos with killing capabilities and send them instead of human soldiers?

    Or <StarTrek>just simulate the war on a computer and have the designated casualties report to the disintegration center.</StarTrek>

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  37. Thought-provoking Big Lebowski quotes by nudnikmeow · · Score: 0

    The Dude: F*** sympathy! I don't need your f***in' sympathy, man, I need my f***ing johnson!

    Donny: What do you need that for, Dude?

    Maybe The Dude was wrong and Donnie was actually right, with prosthetic limbs on the way and all...

    Sell your soul to the devil for a free ipod. Who wouldn't?

  38. Oh great.. by ebob9 · · Score: 1

    Last time the military provided artifical limbs, we all know what happened.

  39. Enhancing Cybernetics? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    Its great that these limbs can come so close to bringing back function to the missing limbs. However, when will we start seeing limbs that can perform BETTER than the old limb?

    I mean, obviously there are some sensory and control issues to be worked out, but why shouldn't someone who lost their arm be able to get one that is 5 times stronger? Or that has other enhancements like a computer interface (or an mp3 player/camera! JOKING!!!)?

    What I'm basically asking about is, why simply settle for replacement when we have the technology for IMPROVEMENT?

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Enhancing Cybernetics? by TLLOTS · · Score: 1

      The present issue I would think is battery power. Certainly there's still a way to go to get a prosthetic limb that perfectly replicates the old one (even in appearance). But a big issue is really just the battery technologies. It's no good if you've got an arm that has the strength of ten men if it goes limp after one go (insert humerous joke here about sex and follow up with joke about slashdotters not having girlfriends and therefore not having sex and therefore not knowing about the truth of afformentioned joke :P).

      There are a few battery technologies that provide some promise over old battery technologies, such as batteries using radioactive materials that can last for very long times, the only issue is they don't create a vast amount of power. Additionally there is research underway of generating electricity using heat generated by the human body via implants. However, just like the battery noted above they produce very little power. Perhaps future prosthetics may use a combination of these technologies?

      Whatever the case, batteries still have a long way to go when it comes to these applications.

    2. Re:Enhancing Cybernetics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't have the technology for improvement. Strength, versatility, dexterity, speed, self-repair, tactility, weight and other functions (hollow bones that carry marrow inside for producing blood cells and stuff), and probably most impressive, power requirements, are pretty wild. Add to that many, many joints and degrees of freedom.

      Do you think you'll ever get a violin player with arm prosthetics? How do you do vibrato without a surplus of joints and tendons?

    3. Re:Enhancing Cybernetics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the dead-flies-eating ecobot. Maybe we get dog-poo-eating cyborg legs.

    4. Re:Enhancing Cybernetics? by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 1

      Even if it's five times stronger, it still has to attach to the body. That attachment would have to be significantly stronger than it naturally would be for it to work. This device (the C-Leg) obviously has a long way to go despite being top of the line: all it does is swing more naturally than a 'dead' prosthetic.

      --
      Error 404 - Sig Not Found
  40. I would like to order... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ten cybernetic prostitutes for immediate rush delivery. Now we'll see who runs this block - Big T ain't got nothin' on this shit.

  41. Cybernetic Prostitutes for Amputees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's just late here, but that particular misreading strikes me as terribly funny.

    And hey, I'm all for it.

    1. Re:Cybernetic Prostitutes for Amputees by Wizarth · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it. So I'll just say: Me too!

    2. Re:Cybernetic Prostitutes for Amputees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys are bastards, I thought I was clever.

      (Just posting A/C as I haven't bothered to make an account yet)

  42. Starship Troopers by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

    Anybody else thinking "starship troopers" here?

    On a more serious note, the proportion of the US population that must've been affected by this war by now is scary. I wonder when it'll end - will we get Vietnam 2.0, or will they manage to resolve things (hopefully NOT by killing everybody who disagrees with them) before it gets to that?

  43. Cybernetic Prostitutes for Amputees by Reez · · Score: 1

    That's what I read at first.

  44. Cybernetic Prostitutes for Amputees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cybernetic Prostitutes... that's awesome!

  45. They must be expensive by cgenman · · Score: 1

    I bet they cost an arm and a leg.

  46. "Balls of steel" by nudnikmeow · · Score: 0

    Gives a whole new meaning to the phrase "Balls of Steel"

    --
    free ipods

  47. Just a thought... by PornMaster · · Score: 1

    It might be cool to have, instead of a wheelchair or prosthetic legs, a Segway-like 2-wheel thing.

    1. Re:Just a thought... by Infinityis · · Score: 1

      Unless of course, you forget to recharge it or the battery runs out for some reason.

      Actually, on second thought, that wouldn't be so bad. I mean, if you have to use your arms to move around, it seems to make a lot of sense to cart the weight of your body around on wheels.

  48. cyberpunk by gnarlin · · Score: 1

    How many sanity points do those amputees have left ?

    --
    A bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver.
  49. What Architecture? by Makenai · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know what type of architecture these prosthetic limbs run on? Is it ARM?
    Yeah.. I couldn't help myself.

  50. C-pecker? by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    Perhaps next?

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  51. Let me guess... by philovivero · · Score: 1
    Returning amputees from Iraq are getting computer-driven artifical limbs allowing greater balance and mobility.
    Let me guess... the returning amputees from Afghanistan, who aren't getting these artificial limbs, are compensated instead with compilers for the self-same computers, hence allowing them to make the amputees from Iraq go dancing around like Natalie Portman with hot grits down her britches?

    Just conjecturing about why only the Iraqi amputees get this cool stuff.
  52. I can put my arm back on... by themoodykid · · Score: 1

    But you can't, so play safe!

  53. Stop the nonsense by Syncdata · · Score: 1

    Yes, it is bad that soldiers are being wounded at all. That is the nature of war however, and it is a mark of Americas worth that we are at least outfitting those unfortunate recipients of major battle wounds with the best limb replacements available.

    We have the technology. We can make them better, at least compared to a peg leg.

    I know you didn't support the war, but I'm sure you at least endorse outfitting these cats with the best limb replacements possible. Please stop confusing administrative policy with effective re-couperative therapy for those carrying out said policy.

    --
    "Inattention makes clowns of us all" -Bean
    1. Re:Stop the nonsense by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      Solidarity goes to the soldiers, that's out of question. Some may torture, coldly execute unarmed & wounded locals but the average soldier is not to blame.

      It's human nature where perfectly sane, even humane, people get sucked up in a savage frenzy. Bump into an averagely educated, perhaps sub-average income, guy in a normal situation and he behaves as normally expected from a citizen. Throw them in the midst of a hooligan riot, or meet them outside a disco club before his male pals and a bunch of hot chicks and you'd be in deep trouble.

      When I saw Farenheit 9/11 I wasn't particularly shocked by the 18 year old kid driving bad ass tanks while listening to death metal. It's war, it happens when you put a machine gun in a stupid kid's hand. He won't have the intellectual tools to handle situations with reason. I know, at that age I was an asshole myself.

      That's why I'm sorry for them when once bitten in the ass, they take the time to think it over and realize they've been screwed. By whom? Those assholes that didn't keep an eye on them, that only trained them for the kill rate and didn't give a fuck about strategy. Command is always responsible for the troops. Go for the brass; it's them that drilled the guys, dehumanized the enemy to justify it's destruction, turned a blind eye to earn the troops' respect.

      Ah, by the way... wasn't it Bush Jr. that reduced spending for the veterans and their medical assistance?

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    2. Re:Stop the nonsense by kerrle · · Score: 1

      You have a very twisted view of the average soldier.

  54. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If you know you've been lied to and still continue, you're pretty much a criminal.

  55. rhetorical police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For crying out loud, I think he's just saying that it's fucked up about Iraq.

  56. Battery life might also be longer... by PornMaster · · Score: 1

    Well, if it doesn't lift the torso up too high to full-body standing height (after all, wheelchairs don't), the center of gravity would be lower than a typical person on a standard Segway (less leverage to counterbalance, etc).

    Without legs, a person's mass would be substantially reduced.

    If the person is lifted above where the feet would go on a standard Segway, there would be more space for batteries as well...

  57. you would think this would have been said already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what no jokes about ARM processors????
    what about the new intel arm with DRM preventing you from doing copyrighted arm movements..

    No arms alerting the RIAA the next time you pull out the guitar and play your favorite tunes?

    but does it RUN linux?

    if they built in a mp3 player in to the leg would it skip free?

    would it have a jog dial???

    SS

  58. "Just doing your jobs"? by ites · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So... war is a job?

    I'm struggling for an answer here. The death of Iraqi civilians in this war roughly equals the deaths brought by the Indian Ocean tsunami. Any serious analysis of the "real reasons" for this war inevitably comes back to oil and money.

    And people who find this war looking remarkably like a war of conquest and colonialisation, who find that loss of life and limb is better prevented at source rather than with gee-whiz technologies... we're told to shut up and let the soldiers get on with their "jobs"?

    I'm full of respect for professional soldiers who risk their lives to protect civilian populations from the tyranny of oppression.

    But you, sir, you are part of the oppression, and job or not, you are responsible for your acts.

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    1. Re:"Just doing your jobs"? by MmmmAqua · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The death of Iraqi civilians in this war roughly equals the deaths brought by the Indian Ocean tsunami. Any serious analysis of the "real reasons" for this war inevitably comes back to oil and money.
      Well, if you want to make it a numbers game, we're still far behind Hussein's total count of Turks and Kurds. And when did I say it didn't amount to a war for corporate profit? It is.
      we're told to shut up and let the soldiers get on with their "jobs"?
      I didn't tell you to shut up. I stated our preference that you not use us as examples or martyrs. Regardless of our individual political opinions (I'm a Democrat), the circumstance of our employment - which is contractual, subject to both USC and UCMJ, and difficult to get out of - make it inappropriate for us to become involved, as a body, in politics. The armed forces exist to defend the United States, and, when given lawful orders by Congress or (in certain circumstances) the President, to make aggressive war on foreign nations. We do not exist to participate in the political processes which carry us to the point of armed conflict. Which means it's inappropriate to drag us into it.

      But you, sir, you are part of the oppression, and job or not, you are responsible for your acts.

      I love it when people say "sir" in an attempt to dignify baseless, crass, and cowardly slander. I'd probably insult you right back, but I'm having a hard enough time keeping a straight face right now.
      --
      Arr! The laws of physics be a harsh mistress!
    2. Re:"Just doing your jobs"? by sgtrock · · Score: 1

      LOL! Preach on, mah brutha!

      Best putdown of a misguided and uninformed civilian that I've seen in 30 years!

    3. Re:"Just doing your jobs"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even Saddam didn't slaughter that much in that short of a time. God, I hope you lose a leg or an arm and have to think about what asshole you are for the rest of your miserable live.

      I guess we should pay respect to those guys who put jews in gas chambers too, right? They only did their job after all.

    4. Re:"Just doing your jobs"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My head asplode! You understand that this war is about robbing the poor to fatten the rich, you voluntarily accepted to take up a gun to enforce this action, and yet you deny that you're in politics?

      The parent poster is not baseless, crass, cowardly, or slanderous. He's just pointing out that you're a immoral hired killer trying to glorify himself with fancy words.

      "Yes, I murdered people who's only crime was to defend their homeland against the thugs of corporate US agression. But I had no choice: my contract told me to!"

      Bull. Shiat.

    5. Re:"Just doing your jobs"? by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      Hope I dont come across as insulting but the bottom line is it is a class war. The example of Saddam Hussein killing Turks and Kurds was the same thing, those with power and money wanting to put down Iran. They used Saddam, gave him the horrible weapons he used against both Irani soldiers and Iraqi civilians. It doesnt matter if the perps were solely from the Reagan administration or the Thatcher administration or the French or Russian. The bottom line is and was that human beings (western ppl like you and eastern ppl like the poor iraqi and irani saps) are considered expendable and unless we the people stop allowing those in power to use us we (regardless of which nation state we belong to) will continue to be killed to further someone elses agenda. I hope I didnt sound patronizing but from where I stand, Bush Blair Saddam the Saudi leaders Ariel Sharon , the late Arafat are all equally culpable and all equally evil. Please read the following if/when you have some spare time.
      Mesopotamia. Babylon. The Tigris and Euphrates by Arundhati Roy
      Instant-Mix Imperial Democracy (Buy One, Get One Free) by Arundhati Roy

    6. Re:"Just doing your jobs"? by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      Another interesting bit about churchill
      I am strongly in favor of using poisoned gas against uncivilized tribes - Churchill

    7. Re:"Just doing your jobs"? by OverkillTASF · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow... Good God almighty.... You make it sound as if American soldiers have killed all those civilians... Ummm... no. Most of the insurgents are not even from Iraq... The insurgents blowing up 40 Iraqis at a time are the ones increasing the death toll, not the U.S. or any other army. How the hell can you sick twisted people ignore that? If I blow up your entire family while trying to kill you, did YOU kill them, or did I?

      You've got MY support, U.S. soldiers. Hell, you might even be in the unit one of my forums sent a big ol' Christmas box to.

      Stay safe.

    8. Re:"Just doing your jobs"? by FussionMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only ones responsible for this war are the American people who elected this administration twice.

    9. Re:"Just doing your jobs"? by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The only ones responsible for this war are the American people who elected this administration twice.

      That's a little unfair on the American people; they voted for the other guy the first time around. However, they did decide, having got this idiot without asking for him, and having seen what he then went and did, to endorse him for four more years, so yes... the American people are now in fact to blame for the idiocy of their administration.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    10. Re:"Just doing your jobs"? by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      So... war is a job?
      It's called duty, and along with words like honor, integrity, and commitment they're used by men better than you and I in a life spent defending something.

      "The death of Iraqi civilians in this war roughly equals the deaths brought by the Indian Ocean tsunami."

      Sure, if you make up numbers. The one study that said the count was up to 100,000 was discredited as using a statistical method in the worst, most innaccurate way possible. You bother to quote me a study that says 100k, and I'll show it's crap really fast.

      But you, sir, you are part of the oppression, and job or not, you are responsible for your acts.

      I find it hard to beleive there are people out there who can say this with a straight face. The people out there our soldiers are putting down are the type who murder iraqi election workers in broad daylight. They're the type that are stepping up the violence every day we move closer to letting iraqis vote for their own future. They're the type that capture truck drivers and aid workers and execute them on videotape for all of us to see.

      You sick fuck. How dare you call our soldiers the oppressors, when all that fights them obviosly wants a return to the brutal baathism or worse of Saddam's time?

      I'm full of respect for professional soldiers who risk their lives to protect civilian populations from the tyranny of oppression.

      You're so full of shit. You've grown up in some nice little suburb insulated from the true evil that exists in the world. Never in your life have you had to face real evil, or even a reflection of it, and you've let it's abscence skew your idea of what evil is.

      You're like some kid who grew up with a hyper-clean mom disinfecting everything in sight, playing video games all day, and never had their body exposed to any actual virusses, diseases or bacteria. You've developed asthma and hay fever, because your immune system mistakes innoculous particles for dangerous ones, having never actually fought a malicious microbe.

      And your sneezing is ending up all over slashdot. The hallmark of modern liberalism is the inability to acknowledge, much less confront, actual evil.

      This is why you're fucking silent when UN troops go raping every child in sight that they're supposed to protect. This is why you're silent when a muslim woman who is raped is later executed for having sex outside of marriage. This is why you were fucking quiet when saddam gassed the kurds.

      Oh, but the US kills someone who was too fucking near a hideout of scum when it was bombed, and you and your buddies make up the signs and dumb little chants and go protest in front of the Washington momument.

      Fuck you, and everything you stand for. If the world was left for the likes of you to run, we'd be overrun by 7th centurary barbarians in no time.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    11. Re:"Just doing your jobs"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I in a life spent defending something.

      Yup, the wealth of a few fatasses. Great job, tool.

      You've grown up in some nice little suburb insulated from the true evil that exists in the world. Never in your life have you had to face real evil

      LOL... you're a little kid who was brainwashed from his early childhood. You'd probably even go to war for a concept as ridiculous as "God" if your masters told you so.

      And your sneezing is ending up all over slashdot. The hallmark of modern liberalism is the inability to acknowledge, much less confront, actual evil.

      See, by looking at the targets our government picks for going to war with (if those pathetic military campaigns against third world nations can even be called real wars), we can easily deduct that "confronting evil" isn't their #1 goal. Only a total moron would think otherwise.

      PS: If you want to be a hero, do something else besides joining the military and killing inhabitants of defenseless desert shitholes. Sorry, it's not as easy as that anymore and bringing back photos of yourself shoving objects up Arabs' asses won't impress anyone besides your trailer trash buddies.

    12. Re:"Just doing your jobs"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      insurgents

      You sure like buzzwords, don't you?

    13. Re:"Just doing your jobs"? by GFono · · Score: 1

      A lot of people who voted for bush didn't support the war, but voted because of "moral issues". Basically, it is a religious thing, and as we know, religion is responsible for half the problems in the world today

    14. Re:"Just doing your jobs"? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Spoken like a well trained military man. So following that logic if your job was doorman to a gas chamber we should all leave you alone to get on with it, right? It is a fallacy to say that only the Nazi's would do that, alot of ordinary citizens in Germany were also just letting them get on with it. When it is over you will become a lot more bitter as the Govt. will leave you high and dry like they always do to veterans.

      What civilians need to ask is why do we allow jobs such as this to exist, let alone actively create them. The sad fact is any government without a military force is treated as a joke. Until the human race has some kind of grand enlightenment, mercenaries will be in high demand by those who seek power and wealth.

      "Gump! Why are you here?"
      "To do as you say. Sir!"
      "Gump! Your a goddam genius!".

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  59. As a prosthetist... by soulee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All I can say, is shame on this administration.

    Now please, don't get me wrong. We in the field are enjoying the publicy and the chance to show off the advancements of the past fews years. And yes, the advancements in prosthetics technology are slow due to funding and lack of research. But what I'm more concerned about is the need for people like me in this war.

    Honestly, when this war began many of us in the industry recieved notices about new patients arriving in as new amputees and we were being asked to write manuals for surgery procedures that are archaic! And endorse the use of out-dated concepts.

    It's appauling the way these troops are being handled. They are not recieving optimal surgeries such as the ERTL procedure. Nor are they all recieving C-legs and Utah-arms. Do you have any idea how much these costs?! No. Not every solider will be getting one and if they did, watch your insurance rates skyrocket. It's just not realistic.

    All I'm saying is that, thank you for the publicity but you are being lied to. This is not what is honestly happening at clinics. This is a poster pin up to make you feel better about the war and the injuries.

    1. Re:As a prosthetist... by loucura! · · Score: 1, Informative

      [I]f they did, watch your insurance rates skyrocket.

      The United States Military provides health-care to its members. So, if they were providing C-legs and the like, then it wouldn't affect any civilian's insurance rates because they are wholly seperate entities. This is much like regular insurance, if you have insurance through company A, and I have insurance through company B, my getting expensive surgery doesn't affect your insurance rates.

      --
      Black and grey are both shades of white.
    2. Re:As a prosthetist... by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      Not quite. Insurance companies buy insurance against the rare huge claims from other insurance companies (though I'm not an expert, I worked for one indirectly writing budgeting software). Your insurance company will most likely take small risks and cover the small claims, but buy insurance from other companies against the large claims so they don't get caught with their pants down when the s**t hits the fan.
      Increases in large claims ripple across the industry as the bigger underwriters are forced to raise their premiums.
      In Australia a couple of years ago one of the large insurers (HIH) went belly up, and it caused a huge increase in premiums across the board. Lots of insurers made heavy losses. The company I was working for had to layoff quite a few people and tighten their belts.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    3. Re:As a prosthetist... by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      wow, what a bunch of useless people have replied to you so far. This is my worst insult to those, who replied to you - they are useless people.

    4. Re:As a prosthetist... by Ikester8 · · Score: 1
      The United States Military provides health-care to its members. So, if they were providing C-legs and the like, then it wouldn't affect any civilian's insurance rates because they are wholly seperate entities.

      Er, who do you think pays for government-granted insurance, salaries, buidlings, weapons, etc.? A government does not produce anything: for it to grant benefits, it must steal from the productive first.

      --
      That's the last time I run code posted in somebody's sig...
    5. Re:As a prosthetist... by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      I am not a medico, but the article says his leg was removed because it had basically died from lack of blood. Does this mean nothing effective was done, his leg turned gangrenous and the they had to cut it off.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  60. Re:Soldiers and human warfare ... time for a chang by Hellasboy · · Score: 1

    humanoid mechs can't navigate terrain, recognize threats, and move as fast as human soldiers *yet*. the best most cost efficient mech that can be made with todays technology would be something similar to those 1st generation terminators in T3. not too wide, can take lots of shots before failure, can carry bigass guns to inflict crazy damage. those things, if made right, would be nearly perfect for urban warfare. send it in, have a human controller view what it's seeing, if an enemy shows up, rotate and angle the miniguns to clear out an area.

    --

    "Tread softly because you tread on my dreams"
  61. The Future by gremlins · · Score: 1

    I bet it is only a matter of time before these things are as good or better then the real thing. Do you think we will ever reach a time where the only way they will let you out of the army is if you die or finish your time? So that a loss of limb might only mean a quick stay at an army hospital and right back to combat.

    --
    just because your a schizophrenic doesn't mean people arn't really out to get you
    1. Re:The Future by Charcharodon · · Score: 2, Informative
      Err that's how it is now. You only get relieved from duty is when you can no longer do it. You get wounded you goto the hospital you get patched up, you go back to duty. When you're time is up you either re-up or go home.

      Now get yourself injured badly enough then you get medical discharge if the military cannot find some sort of lighter duty for you to do to finish out your time.

    2. Re:The Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "I bet it is only a matter of time before these things are as good or better then the real thing."

      When a violinist voluntarily has his arms cut off to be replaced with superior prosthetics, call me.

    3. Re:The Future by gremlins · · Score: 1

      So if you loose your leg they still make you stay in? If that is true I am suprised it isn't reported more.

      --
      just because your a schizophrenic doesn't mean people arn't really out to get you
    4. Re:The Future by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      No that's not how it is. You loose your leg most likely you're done.

      You have to understand alot of these people don't want to go home and a surprising large number try to stay in but can't.

      Various reasons:

      sense of duty - good vs evil God and Country etc
      like to blow stuff up - Cool toys, exciting life, and global living
      probably the most important friends and an unwilliness to abandon them.

      The US armed forces are not conscription based, there is no requirment to serve. People are there because they want to be or because they choose to be there. Don't get me wrong not everyone is happy with their choice or may be surprised to join the guard and end up fighting in a war, but at least some small part of that decission mulled over that risk.

      Now back to the whole loose your leg get a fake one and back to the line you go.

      The other thing most people don't understand, is in bad situations getting wounded in combat, criminal, medical, legal, financial, and reprimand situations the military will gladely help you pack your bags and show you the door, but if you decide to stay know a few people, have the right attitude and skills, and a strong desire to fight a discharge they will do there best to keep you, and yes if you are able, return to combat even minus a limb.

  62. Sweet by digitalmonkey2k1 · · Score: 1

    Now if i loose a limb during year two of Iraq (lets hope not). I can at least mod the shit out of it w/ some LEDs and maybe even OC the chip and add a liquid cooling system... [cries] I could look like my pc.

    --
    My sausage tree didn't grow, does that make me a bad mommy?
  63. job opportunities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and then they can get a job in a Japanese factory!

  64. I wonder how much it costs? by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

    Maybe around 6 million dollars?

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  65. Lister says... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

    "Hand, pick up the ball! Pick up the ball!" *WHACK*

    And of course, the question, do they give out prosthetic foreheads?

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  66. Re:Soldiers and human warfare ... time for a chang by dbIII · · Score: 1
    why not retrofit some Asimos with killing capabilities
    Under rigorously controlled conditions the device will do what it damn well pleases.
  67. Re:What would be nice... regarding GiTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Japanese anime suck.

    Hear hear!

  68. Its all low tech crap! LACKS oseointegration,nerve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are countless advances being made OUTSIDE the fields of orthopedia.

    This includes oseointegration encaps for external attachment (nothing to wear)

    This also includes direct grid taps into nervebundles (currently 100 control points have been inserted into a researcher (himself)).

    Soon thousands of points.

    all these FDA approved devices are all pathetically obsolete already

    MILLIONS of dollars is being spent on direct interface taps into arm nerve bundles.... and yet even famous teen amputees with money such as bethany hamilton are ignorant of the research. Some of them half way into 5 year grant plans.

    MOST... yes MOST amputees discard these 50,000 dollar useless appendages and use their tactile limited bare stumps. MOST!

    with oseointegration, eliminating harnesses and straps and bulk, people would actually WEAR them... but there is less money for the coprporate grab in exotic surgeries.

  69. Re:Join the Army and Win a Chance Torture People by acz · · Score: 1

    We should start a contest for the best spoof
    of those Army flash adverts on Game Spy.

    It would be really interesting... I am ready to buy an Ipod mini
    for the winner and host the web site.

  70. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Respect? I hope you lose a leg, asshole. You murdered over 150.000 people. *You* are the bad guys. Good riddance.

  71. Go Go Gadget Arms! by L.Bob.Rife · · Score: 1

    Why is that poor form? How else can you fight against Dr Claw?

  72. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I didn't care about politics, I was just doing my job."

    Worked great for the Nazis.

    So you're basically saying that you enjoy killing people just for the sake of killing people and don't care why wars are being fought? Don't expect any respect from me, you dumb piece of shit. Enjoy your life as a tool. And if you get some limbs blown off, you deserve it.

  73. Re:Its all low tech crap! LACKS oseointegration,ne by soulee · · Score: 1

    You sir are ignorant.

    First off, the research like that is so far off and uneralistic at the moment. So let's deal in reality shall we? We can not use items that do not exist and are still in experimental stages. We must deal in what is available and practical.

    Secondly, most of these prostheses are not discarded. Where did you pull that from? It is a known fact that most people who BECOME amputees use their artifical devices EXCEPT for upper extremity users. Upper extremity users are unique and advancements have not met up to their standards. The ones who don't usually use limbs are congenital patients who find it easier to function with what they have had since BIRTH!

    Thirdly, these "disgarded" limbs are often send to Limbs For Life who helps supply prosthetics internationally to people who can not afford devices.

    And lastly, straps and buckles are a majority, a thing of the past. Suspension sleeves and silicone fitted sockets have eliminated the need for them, except as I said previously, with upper extremity patients, amateur athletes and geriatrics.

    Next time you talk about something, please educate yourself first.

  74. Re:Yay! by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1

    Whoa. That's rather unfair, I think. The rank-and-file are, by international law, protected from any criminal charges unless implicated in specific criminal acts. While the Iraq war is, like most wars, a grotesque criminal enterprise, soldiers fight out of a sense of self-preservation and loyalty to their friends, regardless of nationality. And rest assured that the people who orchestrated this debacle will never be brought to justice before any earthly court.

    --
    "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
  75. sloow technology by etherelithic · · Score: 1

    Just doing a little ranting here but to be honest with myself, I'm just plain dissapointed at the slow progress of technology when there isn't a major (i.e. WWII) conflict that threatens the livelihood of every individual on the planet. Seems like there's so much red tape, PC, and over-zealous religious figures to go through these days to get enough things done. I'm dissapointed at how seemingly little progress artificial limbs have made in the past 40 years. Is going from a wooden arm to a plastic arm with an electronic clamp such a great leap in 40 years time? Oh just blowing off some steam on slow technological progress, thats all.

  76. Me 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wanna be a Cyborg too! Now it's possible.I just hope Microsoft Skynet can't hack into my robo-arms and legs in the future.

  77. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you people always want respect? You even admit that you're not out there to defend anyone's freedom but rather because of a criminal gang of politicians and still want respect? For what? Face it, you're basically doing a glorified blue collar job. Killing badly armed and trained people in a third world country is not a great accomplishment by any means. Just get over it.

    Get a real job and actually do something useful. Then I'll respect you.

  78. I'd prefer biological replacements... by moz25 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While these developments are quite good, I think the best would be biological replacements. Is there any development in that area?

    On the other hand, I wonder if these replacements have any use in making the wearer of it stronger than with the (original) biological component.

    1. Re:I'd prefer biological replacements... by theufo · · Score: 1

      Actually the Medical Physiology intitute at my univerity is working on growing organs from stem cells in vitro. Extremities will probably be possible as well, but all this won't be practical for at least half a century.

  79. can you imagine a cluster of those!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it would kick ass!

    1. Re:can you imagine a cluster of those!? by qualico · · Score: 1

      especially if you have a cluster of legs.
      It'd be like something of Spriderman's "Doc" character.

  80. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do the "real" reason's for the war have to be the President's? Can't a soldier in Iraq be fighting for his own reasons? As far as I'm concerned, anyone would have been justified overthrowing Saddam and then fighting to stabilize the country afterward. Private enterprise, international do-gooders, whomever. Bush may have the wrong motivations, but that doesn't mean that there are no acceptable motivations for the current war.

  81. So... by JonLatane · · Score: 1
    Would a Beowulf cluster of these be, like... a person?

    Oh yes, I went there. :P

  82. Cybernetic hand w/ strength upgrade! by ChuyMatt · · Score: 0

    "Groovy"

  83. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, riiiight... So stabilizing a country means dropping 1000 lb bombs in residential areas and leveling a whole city in 3 weeks, killing a few thousand? Dream on, dude...

  84. A whole new ballpark for computers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Epilepsy? No, Windows CE.

    Dyslexia? No, DRM. My hand won't write copyrighted material in the original spelling.

  85. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who are the "bad guys" ?

    Seems to me you have the typical black/white, good/bad simplistic world view that characterises the ignorant american cannon fodder sent to do their rich masters bidding.

    Good guys, bad guys, cowboys and indians...... Fox News sure did a good job on you huh?

    You're just a patsy, maybe you can't change that, maybe there's not a lot you could do about it but it doesn't change the fact you're a patsy.

    And you wonder why the Iraqi freedom fighters want to kill you........

    The real rub is, you get sent there and end up killed or maimed and your own government doesn't even appear to give a shit as long as you deliver to them the oil and war profits.

    How many funerals has Bush attended?

    Patsy.

  86. well by Kanasta · · Score: 0, Redundant

    will they be given movement the same as a real limb, or will they for example be able to rotate their wrists 360

  87. Just hadda say it by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    These futuristic limbs have hydraulic pumps visible through its clear plastic shell.

    Kinda gives new meaning to the word skinning, doesn't it?

    Thanks, I'll be here all week...

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  88. Humanity at its best... by tchernobog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From TFA: "I think I killed over 20 people," he said. "You could see them, through your scope, 40 meters away, get hit by your bullet. Later in the day you thought, wow, I just killed someone. But it's not like they're innocent."

    Instead of an artificial leg, they should have given him a new brain.

    Yes, call me a troll, or say I'm OT. But I can't stand these abused sentences any more. You killed somebody, for heaven's sake! It's not like YOU are innocent at all. And you thought "wow"?

    World isn't UT2004, ya' know.

    --
    42.
    1. Re:Humanity at its best... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's appalling and repulsive.

      You could easily swap "When you shoot a Muslim" for "When you shoot a NeoCon" and have the *exact* same argument from the Muslim side.

      Why is _your_ moral scale superior to someone else's? What makes it so? Pathetic moral relativism - nice phrase, but do you really know what you mean?

      I am not a Muslim, but your apparent lack of sympathy, compassion, empathy and understanding make you as bad as the "Evil Muslims" that are so *dirty*.

  89. what if someone lost the middle leg? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    Do they have computer driven strap-on's yet?

    (didn't RTFA)
    (also, spell "strap on" backwards)

  90. Just one question by sammyo · · Score: 1

    What do the children in Iraq get for their missing limbs?

  91. Re:Yay! by MmmmAqua · · Score: 1

    I'd love to have taken over Iraq with bouquets of flowers and heart-shaped greeting cards, but they just lack real stopping power.

    --
    Arr! The laws of physics be a harsh mistress!
  92. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many funerals has Bush attended?

    Bush is busy man. What good would a dead soldier do to his family's businesses? He needs to concentrate on the issues that are still alive and profitable.

  93. eBooty by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Can't we strap all these things to a notebook computer, mount some fake tits, insert a copy of _In the Zone_, and each have our own eBritney to shake for us?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  94. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about a *fair* fight? Or how about not engaging in an illegal war of aggression at all?

    You piece of shit defend slaughtering thousands and thousands of completely innocent civilans *for fun*. You are no better than Saddam. Stop talking about good and bad guys, you're clearly as evil as it can get. A murderer, nothing else.

  95. Which amputees ... by mikewhittaker · · Score: 1
    Not that I wish anything but the best for them, but I presume the poster meant to say "returning US civilian and military amputees".

    I just hope to whichever god you subscribe to that the people who are supposed to benefit from all this, the Iraqis, come out better in the next few months, despite the best efforts of their misguided and murderous "insurgents".

  96. Well close enough.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn, I was worried there for a while. I thought it read "Cybernetic Prostitutes" for Amputees". I was just thinking why should just the amputees get something we all need?

  97. F That by SpookyJim · · Score: 1

    I'm supposed to be heading over there in a few months. I'm not too excited, but oh well. I don't care how good prostetics get, if it has to come down to it, they better just kill my ass.

  98. The Big Picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one that is disturbed by the increased market for these devices? Advances in body armor have made for an extremely large number of amputees coming out of Iraq (in the thousands). Yet, for all of this tragedy, a post like this still results in posts like "does it run linux?".

    Given the current problems that surround the reserves and recruitment in the US Military, these issues will be close to home sooner than some of the posters realize. For us to continue waging the war, we will need more soldiers. Conscription is around the corner. Changes have already taken place in selective service registration. This is something that directly impacts many of the slashdot.org readers.

    Unfortunately, we aren't keeping track of an slashdotters deployed in Iraq. By numbers, we probably have already lost a few readers and posters.

    Have fun. Play Counter-Strike, Americas Army, but just remember that respawn time in real-life blows.

  99. Noise Resistance ? by fygment · · Score: 1

    Several years ago, an acquaintance with an electric wheel chair sought my help in 'noise hardening' his chair. In areas with lots of A/C line noise, generators, motors, etc., his chair would go beserk. We never had any success. The manufacturer refused to acknowledge any problem. Do these prosthetic limbs have the same potential problem?

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  100. A Better Solution: +10, Patriotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    "Returning amputees from Iraq are getting computer-driven artifical limbs allowing greater balance and mobility."

    Stop the War For Oil

    Thanks in advance,
    Kilgore Trout, CTO

  101. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You obviously know all about it.

    I'm not for the war, but you're a real asshole.

  102. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    clarification: directed at the guy asking for a 'fair fight'

  103. Link to Utah Arm 3 Information by RustNeverSleeps · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's a link to the website of the company that makes the Utah Arm 3: http://www.utaharm.com/products.htm.

  104. non events, or, let's focus on the negative! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    This is good news, but you know, it doesn't put a smile on my face. If there were a story here entitled "Thousands of kids didn't lose their leg in the first place" that would make me smile.

    Boy do I have news for you!

    Cheer up: Billions of kids didn't loose ANY limbs at all!
    In the united states alone, hundreds of millions of kids didn't loose their legs during the 20th century! Hazzah!

    But for those that did, this is reason to smile.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:non events, or, let's focus on the negative! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Here's a diagram of the relative positions:

      Point

      Your head

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  105. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    > Yeah, parent was a troll, and yeah, this is off topic, but seeing as how I'm sitting here in Baghdad, I just want to point something out:

    1) It ain't off topic.

    2) Thanks. Not for doing the kind of things we civvies don't understand. But for the fact that because of what you're doing, we civvies will never need to fully understand what you're doing.

  106. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."

    Article I, Section 8, Clause 11:
    The Congress shall have Power to declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water.

    Why Won't Congress Declare War?

    Since you have sworn to uphold the Constitution against all enemies, the Constitution makes it clear that only Congress is allowed to declare war, and Congress did not authorize this war, you (and everyone else) have broken your oath by going along with it.

    Granted, I wouldn't want to go to military jail either if I were you, but the responsibility is clear. You took on that responsibility the day you joined.

    It's a bit cliched by now, but military and police personnel on trial at Nuremberg were found to be responsible for the atrocities of the Nazis by way of not questioning orders. For more on this problem, go read Obedience to Authority by Stanley Milgram.

  107. Re:Soldiers and human warfare ... time for a chang by kerrle · · Score: 1
    There's a very simple reason.

    When you've removed the loss associated with war from the equation, what's to stop a country from going to war as a first response, instead of when all other responses are exhausted? (and please, no political commentary on the current situation, I'm speaking generally)

    Trust me, if we didn't have the superior forces and technology that allow us to fight as we do, we'd be far less likely to be in Iraq at all - no American wants us to go through the trench warfare of WWI or the jungle combat of Vietnam again. When war hurts, it's far less likely to take place. As is - we've been at war for over a year, and I don't know a single casualty personally. I'm not being callous, I'm just pointing out that a nation accepts war more easily if the perceived loss is smaller.

  108. Re:Join the Army and Win a Chance to Become a Cybo by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

    They already do their best to recruit Counter-Strike players on Gamespy! (I am not kidding!)

    So we'll have an army of guys trying to bunny hop across the battlefield, and getting shot up because they ran out into the middle of an open area to retrieve an RPG dropped by the enemy? Johnny's dying words? "See you in three minutes, sarge".

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  109. Nice To Know... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


    that the rest of the ten or twenty or fifty thousand casualties to be coming from Iraq (and Iran, and Syria, and Saudi Arabia, and North Korea) will all be able to look like Arnold...

    Wonder if any of these devices are available to the hundred thousand Iraqi civilian casualties...or the million more to come...

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  110. let's focus on the negative! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1
    Here's a diagram of the relative positions:

    Point

    Your head


    Oh yeah?

    Your point was that there could be a technological devellopment that would prevent amputations?
    Not in our lifetimes I'm affraid.

    That no technological advancements are worthy of attention bar those that are full-on miracles?
    Go live in a cave.

    Since YOU missed my point:

    Mice dont go away, so we build better mouse traps.
    Or:
    Stop raining on the enhanced prosthesis parade; it's a step up. We shouldn't hold out for the giant leap.

    P.S. trying not to sound too harsh, failing.
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:let's focus on the negative! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 0, Troll

      Your point was that there could be a technological devellopment that would prevent amputations?

      Exactly, you didn't understand my point AT ALL. I'm saying that there could be a political development that would prevent people from losing their legs: abandon an immoral war in Iraq. That's not technical, unless GW Bush is actually a robot, which would be very cool and also explain a great deal.

      Since YOU missed my point:

      Oh really? If your point is based on your misunderstanding of my point, I don't really care what that would be. Thus, I didn't miss your point; I ignored your point.

      P.S. trying not to sound too harsh, failing.

      No problem. I can dish it out, and I can take it too. Don't waste energy being polite.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    2. Re:let's focus on the negative! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I'm saying that there could be a political development that would prevent people from losing their legs: abandon an immoral war in Iraq.

      Oh, I couldn't possibly expect that you meant THAT.

      That's just stupid.

      Car accidents? Cancer? You know...
      Ah well, go back to making cryptic political jabs.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:let's focus on the negative! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 0, Troll

      Stupid? You know what's stupid? You, particularly when my cock is bouncing on your forehead.

      You call it a cryptic politcal jab, but you're such an obtuse cock licker that you didn't get what everyone else easily saw. You might think you're the brightest bulb in the room, but that's only because you're too stupid to realize that everyone else is smarter than you.

      You're jumping around yelling that you can eat more cum than anyone else, but you don't realize that the game isn't to see who can eat the most cum. It's like golf. You try to eat *less*. In the meantime, you keep guzzling that spunk!

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  111. Re:Prosthetic limbs superior organics ones. by ArcticCelt · · Score: 1
    If technology keeps developing at the rate it has been, how long will it be before prosthetic limbs become superior to the ones we are born with?

    Genetic discovery is also evolving very fast and I wont be surprise that it will be easier to inject ourselves a DNA enhancer that will augment our muscular performances, boost our immunization and healing capacities, give us some "bath like" radar vision and really enlarge some part of the human body by some 3 to 6 inches. Of course you all understood I was talking about the brain. ;)

    Even if still scary, I think those kind of tweaking are better than to turn people into "Borgs/Robocops/Inspectors Gadgets". Still, I think you point is valid for some enhancement. In my opinion hardware tweaking that could be useful is maybe a brain data port ala Matrix so we can comunicate and learn almost instantly.

    //And also now that I think about it, maybe also a "frickin laser beam on the forehead."

    --

    Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove
  112. OT: casualty count by jonbrewer · · Score: 1

    BTW, you can see the overall casualty counts (wounds and deaths separately) at globalsecurity.org. (Notice the running-average plots at the bottom, which show the trends.)

    Anyone know where to get an RSS feed or similar machine readable counts of this? How about Iraqi casualties? I would like to see such statistics as widely published as possible.

  113. -1, can't read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    parent isn't in the military

  114. ARM Jokes by Anti_Climax · · Score: 1

    9 hours and no jokes about ARM processors?

    I'm suprised and disappointed...

    --
    Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
  115. Did Anyone Else... by Stephen+Maturin · · Score: 1

    Read this as 'Cybernetic Prostitutes for Amputees"?

    --
    Non tam praeclarum est scire Latine, quam turpe nescire
    -- Cicero
  116. The leg is not really new by Benoa · · Score: 1

    I'v already seen this kind of things months ago. There's a video http://www.victhom.com/en/jambe.htm of Victhom's leg using, I think, the same kind of techs and which is quite impressive. It looks like some sci-fi movie clip but hey, it's real!

  117. Evil. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    Note: I am not the original poster, just someone who thinks you have really screwed up morals backed up by little else other than convienient stereotypes.

    "You've grown up in some nice little suburb insulated from the true evil that exists in the world. Never in your life have you had to face real evil, or even a reflection of it, and you've let it's abscence skew your idea of what evil is....Oh, but the US kills someone who was too fucking near a hideout of scum when it was bombed

    An Afgan refugee when asked her opinion about the N.A. taking over from the Taliban said "The Taliban shoot first then ask questions. The N.A. ask questions then drop bombs. Nothing will change."

    No matter how many "terrorist acts" someone has performed. Why is it anything but "evil" to drop a 500lb bomb on a house/cafe, or shoot a hellfire missile into an apartment building that is the suspected hideout of an accused evil-dooer? If by those standards you find it justifiable, then it is also justifiable to drop a similar bomb on Timothy McVeigh's house or the farm at Waco or the nut with the sniper rifle or the local crack house or...get the idea. I suppose if YOU happened to live next door (and survived the blast) you would stoicaly burry the recognisable bits of your family without complaint. Because of your special knowlage of "evil", you do nothing (even if you could). The suspected scum were vapourised so you can take pride that your family died honorably (and very messily) in service of your country, god, democracy, whatever -ism you belive is worth the lives and limbs of people who were "too fucking near a hideout of scum ", ie: your family become instant martyrs and you are proud but saddened by it. War itself is evil (be it for your favorite God/Country or simple theft) and many who participate in it (or happen to be too fucking close) are both victims and instruments of the evil.

    "the type" - Three times in one paragraph. Exactly how do you spot "the type"? Do they have 666 on thier foreheads?

    "hyper-clean mom's", "malicious microbes"-Sounds like an LSD trip,or is it just the demon voices in your head.

    "Fuck you, and everything you stand for. If the world was left for the likes of you to run, we'd be overrun by 7th centurary barbarians in no time. "

    Fuck you and all your tin-soldiers, your moral system is nothing more than zenophobic parinoia, it has had millenia to run the planet and has produced nothing but destruction and misery for the vast majority of humanity. Apart from ideological details, how is your attitude less "barbaric" than a 7th Century warrior pillaging villages, a 20th Century German fighting the "plague of jews", a 21st Century Zionist sniper picking off schoolkids, a group of religious zealots with a jumbo, anyone else who wants to change the world by blowing it up. These people (yourself included) only have respect for thier self-serving ideologies and they judge and execute others based on thier ever morphing morals of conveniance.

    "The hallmark of modern liberalism is the inability to acknowledge, much less confront, actual evil."

    I've heard that line before...hmm, lets do a google search. Well, surrrprise, surrrprise, it's GWB himself. At least give him credit for the hate he has been spreading, rather than stealing it for yourself.

    Since I won't swallow your neo-con dogma, you probably consider me a "liberal". If I am indeed a "liberal", then this post demonstrates that an old-fat-white-athiest-liberal-tree-hugging-fancy-p ants-book-learning-immigrant can also learn to recognise, confront and unmask "evil". As for silence against acts of "evil" that do not involve the US (that leaves out Saddam and the gas), you will have to do better than name calling and projection to stop me pointing out the "log in YOUR eye".

    Bad shit happens, it turns into "evil" shit when people with integrity are taught to accept it as a commitment to honorable duty.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:Evil. by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      We seem to have a fundamental disagreement, as far as I can tell, as to wether war is ever a necessary evil. I believe that from time to time it is.

      Unless we can agree on that, there's no point in discussing anything further.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
  118. 3 stupid, 1 cock, 1 cum, 1 spunk? lol! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    Stupid? You know what's stupid? You, particularly when my cock is bouncing on your forehead.

    Wow, it must take a GENIUS to come up with some reparte like that! lol!

    you're such an obtuse cock licker
    you're too stupid
    you can eat more cum than anyone else
    you keep guzzling that spunk


    Hahaha, oh how your words sting!

    Ah... it's good to laugh on a monday morning.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:3 stupid, 1 cock, 1 cum, 1 spunk? lol! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 0, Troll

      The only one laughing is your wife. Strange, I didn't know you could laugh and gargle cum at the same time!

      anyway, it's true. You think you're smart, but EVERYONE else knew what I was talking about but you.

      You're laughing at me? Well, I'm fucking your mother!

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    2. Re:3 stupid, 1 cock, 1 cum, 1 spunk? lol! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      You're laughing at me?

      A lot!

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:3 stupid, 1 cock, 1 cum, 1 spunk? lol! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      I like you. You've got a lot of spunk. And it's cute how you gargle with it.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  119. Re:Join the Army and Win a Chance to Become a Cybo by acz · · Score: 1

    ahahah :) good one.